Care And Rehab - Cumberland

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.08 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (PI) (R32) received care consistently with professional standards of practice to prevent further deterioration and promote healing of an existing PI. R32 was at risk for PI development. The facility failed to provide adequate and consistent wound care treatments, did not complete comprehensive weekly assessment, and did not notify provider of new PI.Findings include: R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic aortic insufficiency, hypertensive heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, unilateral osteoarthritis left ankle and foot, hypertension, weakness, and presence of right artificial hip joint.R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/25, identified R32 required substantial maximal assistance for bed mobility, taking on and off footwear, rolling left to right, sit to lying, chair to bed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility must ensure each resident is free from unnecessary medications as evidenced by completing adequate behavioral monitoring for 2 of 5 residents (R7 and R16) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings:Facility policy titled, PSYCHOTOPIC MEDICATIONS, revised 1/26, stated in part: 6. The specific targeted behaviors for which the drug is being administered will be entered by the nurse on the behavior monitoring record. The effectiveness of the psychotropic drug will be documented on the behavior sheet each shift. Total occurrences may be based on the personal observation or the observation of other staff members 8. The effectiveness of the psychotropic drug on the targeted behavior will be addressed at least monthly in the interdisciplinary notes .10. The behavior monitoring record will be reviewed quarterly . Example 1R7 was admitted on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 which indicated R7 was cognitively intact. R7 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide the proper discharge documentation for 2 of 2 residents (R44 and R4) reviewed for discharge.Facility did not have bed hold or notice of transfer documentation for R44.Facility did not have Ombudsman notification and notice of transfer documentation for R4.Findings:Example 1R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13/15, which indicated R44 was cognitively intact. R44 had Minimum Data Set (MDS) stating 'Discharge Return Anticipated' dated on 01/14/26 and 12/21/25.On 02/18/26 at 9:13 AM, Surveyor was unable to find a bed hold for discharge date of 01/14/26 and a notice of transfer form. Surveyor asked Director of Nursing (DON) B for these documents.On 02/18/26 at 9:43 AM, DON B came into the conference room asking Surveyor what needs to be on the 'Notice of Transfer.' Surveyor informed DON B, The Notice of Transfer needs to have 1) in writing, 2) in language they understand, 3) the reason for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not conduct a Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) Level II screen for R1, who has a serious mental disorder and is taking psychotropic medication to treat symptoms of major mental disorder to ensure he received care and services to meet his needs. The facility practice affected 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed (R1).Findings include:Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. PASRR requires that Medicaid-certified nursing facilities:Evaluate all applicants for serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability (ID)Offered all applicants the most appropriate setting for their needs (in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care settings)Provide all applicants the services they need in those settingsPASRR screenings determine whether applicants might have an intellectual/developmental disability (ID/DD) and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not develop and implement a person-centered care plan for a resident consistent with resident rights including services to attain or maintain the resident's highest or practicable physical, mental or psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents (R5). R5 did not have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for the use of a high-risk medications of Apixaban, which is an anticoagulant, Furosemide, which is a diuretic, and Lantus subcutaneous solution, which is an insulin. Findings include:Facility policy titled, Care Planning, revised 12/25, states in part, See AMDA guidelines. American Medical Directors Association (AMDA) guidelines states in part, Care Plan .Interventions: Specific, actionable steps for nursing staff, including monitoring, non-pharmacological interventions, and pharmacological management.R5 was admitted on [DATE]. R5's diagnosis included diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, obstructive and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure care plan was revised to reflect resident's current needs and direct staff in providing necessary care and services. The facility practice affected 1 of 15 residents' care plans reviewed (R5).R5 had changes in mood and increased depression. R5's care plan was not updated to reflect changes identified, interventions, and monitoring of R5. Findings include:According to the Resident Assessment Instrument, The comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool. It must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The care plan should be revised on an ongoing basis to reflect changes in the resident and the care that the resident is receiving.R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney diseases, prostate cancer,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R32) of 1 resident reviewed receiving physical therapy received the care necessary to meet professional standards.Facility did not obtain a Cam boot for R32's transfers as ordered from Orthopedic Surgeon I.Findings include:R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, atrial fibrillation, nonrheumatic aortic insufficiency, hypertensive heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, unilateral osteoarthritis left ankle and foot, hypertension, weakness, and presence of right artificial hip joint.R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/25, identified R32 required substantial maximal assistance for bed mobility, taking on and off footwear, rolling left to right, sitting to lying, chair to bed, toileting, and for transfers.Surveyor reviewed R32's ortho notes, which stated in part, .-On 02/10/26, Left tibia/fibula fractureMay remove temp splint and transition to tall Cam walking boot. May remove…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were safe in their environment to prevent the risk of falling. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for falls, (R16). The facility staff did not ensure R16 had dycem pad while R16 was sitting in recliner as care planned.Findings include: R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including in part, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, hypertensive kidney disease stage 1-4, Alzheimer's disease, benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges, nonrheumatic aortic stenosis, dementia, personal history of MRSA, and muscle weakness. R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/06/25, identified R16 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10/15 that identified R16 with moderate cognitive impairment. R16's fall risk care plan stated, R16 is at risk for falls r/t disease process, dementia initiated on 09/26/2023: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection, for 2 out of 13 residents (R) (R2 and R4) reviewed. R2 and R4 have indwelling medical devices and were not on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H did not perform hand hygiene during water flush for R4's peg tube. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Manual Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP)reads in part, .The purpose of Enhanced Barrier Precautions is to prevent opportunities for transfer of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms (MDROs) to employee's hands and clothing during cares, beyond situations in which staff anticipate exposure to blood or body fluids. High-contact resident care activities include Dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) which must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program with a system to monitor antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect 1 of 5 residents (R7) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Hospice placed R7 on Cephalexin 500mg oral to be given two times a day for a UTI, which was not diagnosed with a urinalysis (U/A) and a culture and sensitivity (C & S). Facility did not ensure the antibiotic stewardship program was followed and that the criteria used to identify infection, McGeer's, was followed.Findings:Facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship Policy, copy with permission dated 2023 stated in part: .Procedure: .2. The Nurse will utilize the (insert facility identified/approved standardized criteria tools: i.e. Loeb Minimum Criteria, McGeer Constitutional Criteria, AHRQ-UTI SBAR, etc.) infection criteria protocol to assess/evaluate resident to determine if it is necessary to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure a thorough investigation for 1 of 1 (R1) resident reviewed for safety concerns.R1 fell during an assist of 1 transfer with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C without proper safety measures in place. Facility did not complete a thorough investigation when they did not interview or investigate for potential risk to other residents throughout the facility.This is evidenced by:The facility's policy and procedure for Abuse Prevention, last reviewed 05/2025, includes, in part: .The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. The purpose of the policy is to use a systematic approach to the creating of a climate which encourages the protection of the right to be free from abuse. This will be done by:* 6. A thorough investigation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-19 for 76 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARE & REHAB — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $160K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI