Maple Springs Of Palmer

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.58 to 1.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Establish safety measures for proper cigarette disposal and the use of required adaptive devices, identified during smoking safety assessments, for residents who smoke tobacco on the facility's campus for 5 residents (#'s 9, 10, 21, 32, and 47), out of 7 total residents who smoked; 2) Complete annual smoking safety screening assessments for 4 residents (#'s 9, 21, 32, and 47), out of 7 total residents who smoked; 3) Complete smoking safety screening assessments for 3 residents (#'s 12, 25, and 54), out of 3 total residents who used electronic cigarettes (known as vapes); and 4) Secure lighters within the facility for 6 residents (#'s 9, 10, 21, 32, 47, and 53), out of 7 total residents who smoked. These failed practices placed all 9 residents at immediate risk of injury and/or death and placed all residents (based on a census of 60) at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency in accordance with CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) S483.12 (b)(5) for 1 resident (#2), out of 4 sampled residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the State Survey Agency of alleged violations involving abuse no later than two hours after allegation was made. This failed practice had the potential for continued abuse and placed vulnerable residents at risk of harm .Record review on 8/4-5/25 revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that affects movement and causes tremors, stiffness and slowness), anxiety disorder (a mental disorder characterized by uncontrollable feeling of anxiety and fear), post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health condition that is caused by extremely stressful or terrifying event) and depression.Review of the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] Care Conference 1.0 note, dated 7/17/25 at 2:01 PM, revealed: [Resident #2] has also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to respond to an allegation of verbal abuse for 1 resident (2), out of 4 sampled residents reviewed, in accordance with CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) S483.12(c). Specifically, the facility failed to:1) thoroughly investigate allegations of verbal abuse;2) prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress; and3) report results of an investigation to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident to include verification of allegations and corrective actions taken.This failed practice resulted in Resident #2's unhappiness in the facility and fear of retaliation. This failed practice also placed Resident #2 at risk of continued abuse and receiving care in a less-than-optimal setting .Record review on 8/4-5/25 revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that affects movement and causes tremors, stiffness and slowness), anxiety disorder (a mental disorder characterized by uncontrollable feeling of anxiety and fear),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the manufacturer's manual, the facility failed to conduct monthly inspections of seven of seven facility owned Hoyer (mechanical) lifts and of lifts owned by two of two (Resident (R) 2 and R6) residents with personal mechanical lifts. This failure increased the risks of accidents due to mechanical failure. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Specialized Medical Equipment, dated 04/04/24, revealed, . Maple Springs will ensure that all specialized medical equipment is identified and assessed for safety and necessity . Review of the undated MedLine Battery Operated Patient Lift manual, provided by the Maintenance Director (MD), revealed, . At least once a month, the patient lift should be thoroughly inspected to recognize any signs of wear, and/or looseness of bolts or parts. Replace any worn parts immediately . Always follow the maintenance and cleaning schedule closely and fully while including any specific…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report injuries of unknown origin and allegations of abuse and neglect immediately to the Resident Advocate (RA) and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for three of three residents (Resident (R) 3, R1, and R5) reviewed for abuse and neglect out of a total sample of six. Failure to report injuries of unknown origin and allegations of abuse and neglect places residents at risk for continued potential abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Policies, dated 12/2023, revealed, . All allegations of abuse and/or neglect will be reported to the Administrator and/or designee, including incidents involving injured resident's where the origin of the injury in [sic] unknown . Facility will report immediately, but not later than two hours after forming the suspicion or allegation, if the events that cause the suspicion or allegation result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse and bruising of unknown origin for two of five residents (Resident (R) 3 and R1) reviewed for abuse and neglect out of a total sample of six. Failure to thoroughly investigate allegations of neglect and injuries of unknown origin places residents at risk for potential continued abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Policies, dated 12/2023, revealed, . All allegations of abuse and/or neglect will be reported to the Administrator and/or designee, including incidents involving injured resident's where the origin of the injury in [sic] unknown . All pertinent information will be reviewed during the investigation . A list of witnesses and other persons knowledgeable about the event will be compiled . Interviews will be conducted with the following individuals: a. The individual(s) making the report. B. The individual(s) alleged to be involved with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete skin assessments for one of six sampled residents (Resident (R) 1) whose records were reviewed. Failure to complete routine skin assessments placed residents at increased risk of alterations in skin integrity. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment, revised 02/2024, revealed, . Head-to-toe assessments will be performed by nursing staff at least weekly on all residents . Physical Exam: . Skin: a. intactness; b. moisture; c. color; d. texture; e. presence of bruises . The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record . All assessment data obtained during the procedure . Review of R1's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, nondisplaced fracture of the sacrum, hallucinations, and unspecified fracture of the thoracic vertebrae. Review of R1's Care Plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) reviewed for the use of mechanical lifts out of a total sample of six was transferred in a safe manner, using two people as per facility policy. Failure to transfer residents in a safe manner placed R2 at risk for injury. Following the incident, the facility identified and implemented a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) to ensure staff followed the facility's policy requiring two staff members when using a mechanical lift. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, dated 07/2017, revealed, . At least two (2) nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift . Review of R2's Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate skill sets to administer medications accurately for 1 resident (#8), out of 9 residents observed for medication administration. Specifically, the Licensed Nurse (LN) removed and administered a medication from a blister pack (a 30-day supply of medications in a card with bubbled packaging for individual doses of the medication) that was not labeled for the intended recipient. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for potential adverse outcomes of medication errors, or the possibility of running out of medications that were borrowed. Findings: Resident #8 Record review on 3/23-27/25 revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included unspecified injury at C1 level of cervical spinal cord, sequela (past injury at the top of the spinal cord in the neck that has resulted in long term or residual effects, such as weakness, paralysis, or other neurological impairments) and quadriplegia, unspecified (partial or complete paralysis of all four limbs, often…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1) concentrations of kitchen sanitizing solutions were maintained within acceptable parameters to ensure it adequately cleaned kitchen surfaces; and 2) concentrations of fruit and vegetable cleaning solution was maintained within acceptable parameters to ensure produce was appropriately cleaned prior to being served to residents. These failed practices created a potential for food borne illness and/or cross contamination for 57 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: Sink & Surface Cleaner Sanitizer An observation on 3/25/25 at 11:15 AM, revealed three red buckets that were labeled on the front that stated, Ecolab Sanitizing Solution Only. One bucket was located on the bottom shelf of the food preparation line table used by the cooks while plating meals, one was located by the dishwashing station, and one bucket was located by the food preparation sinks. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 11:25 AM, [NAME] #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a produce wash solution dispenser was in operating condition. This failed practice placed 57 residents that received food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illnesses and communicable diseases from subquality cleaning of fresh produce. Findings: An observation on 3/25/25 at 11:18 AM, revealed a produce wash solution dispenser labeled, Ecolab Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment to the right side of the food preparation sinks. It was also observed that there were test strips on top of the dispenser, and it was noted that a blue water pipe was on the right side of the dispenser with a water line connecting to the dispenser. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 11:25 AM, [NAME] #1 stated this solution was used to wash produce prior to being prepared and served to the residents. Review on 3/26/25 of the Ecolab Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment Test Strip, used by the facility, with an expiration date of February 2026 and November 2026, revealed the following instructions: .Immerse the strip…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,594 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $38,691 — penalty dated 2025-03-27
• $7,903 — penalty dated 2024-02-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAPLE SPRINGS LIVING — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 90% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AK