Maple Springs Senior Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 242 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 34.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 113 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 37.0 residents a day — about 38% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.49 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.04 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.70 to 0.98 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 5 sampled residents, that the facility failed to provide each resident with a safe diet that met the special dietary needs of each resident. Specifically, a resident had a diet order for moist and minced texture and was given a cheese stick and pretzels for a snack which resulted in the resident choking and passing away. Resident identifier: 1It was determined the provider's noncompliance with this rule caused harm. However, based on the facility's corrective actions and a review of its current compliance, the deficiency was determined to be past noncompliance. The facility developed and implemented a corrective action plan before the survey start date. The facility's corrective action plan, which was developed and implemented by December 3, 2025, included the following measures. The Director of Nursing (DON) added a column on the Nurse report sheet to identify textures and diets for all current residents. The DON audited diets and textures to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the refrigerator and freezer were undated, and sanitizer buckets did not meet the required sanitation testing levels. Findings included: 1. On 2/23/26 at 8:25 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. The Dietary Manager (DM) was behind the preparation table and was not wearing a hairnet. b. An opened and undated bag of whipped topping was in the refrigerator. c. A pan of meatballs was undated in the refrigerator. d. A bag of frozen rolls were opened and undated in the freezer. e. The sanitation bucket at the preparation table was tested by the DM and resulted at 150 parts per million (PPM). The DM stated that the level should be at 200 PPM. The DM stated that she needed to pour out the water from the bucket and start again. The DM stated that the sani buckets were changed at least three times a day after every meal service. 2. On 2/24/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 39 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, a resident was not provided crushed medications as ordered by the physician. Resident identifier: 64. Findings include: Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/5/26 with diagnoses which included fractures of right pubis and left pubis, sacrum fracture, dysphagia, and age-related osteoporosis. Resident 64's medical record was reviewed 2/23/26 through 2/25/26. The facility reported to the SSA on 12/30/25, that resident 64's family reported resident 64 was receiving whole pills instead of crushed medications. The investigation revealed that resident 64 had 3 medications that were not able to be crushed. Resident 64's Discharge Summary from the hospital dated 12/20/25, revealed resident 64 was observed to have an episode of choking on toast while eating breakfast. There were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had supervision to prevent accidents. Specifically, for 2 out of 39 sampled residents, a resident was not secured in the facility van and tipped backwards sustaining a closed head injury. This example was cited at a harm level. Resident identifier: 73. Findings included: Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 6/21/25 with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diastolic heart failure, and anxiety. The facility reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) on 5/29/25, that resident 73 was transported to an appointment when her wheelchair tipped backwards and she bumped her head on the ramp that was folded up behind her. The transport driver asked resident 73 if she was okay, tipped the wheelchair upright, and strapped the front of the chair in, and took her to instacare where her appointment was and ensured that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, under proper temperature controls and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, for 1 out of 39 sampled residents, a controlled drug was stored in a manner that failed to prevent potential drug diversion and ensure safe medication administration. Resident Identifier: 21. Findings included: On 2/25/26 at 10:38 AM, during a review of the facility's medication carts, an observation was made of a blister pack containing Percocet 10-325 milligram tablets. The blister pack had 1 tablet taped into an opened blister cell. The Percocet, a Schedule II narcotic, was prescribed for resident 21. At the time of the observation an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated medication tablets should not be taped back into blister cells to prevent the incorrect medication from being replaced in the blister cell. Additionally, RN 2 stated if a narcotic tablet was removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Specifically, for 2 out of 39 sampled residents, one resident had a urinary catheter bag observed on the floor, and for a second resident receiving wound care, hand hygiene and glove changes were not performed. Resident identifiers: 2 and 9. Findings included: 1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, retention of urine, and obstructive and reflexive uropathy.Resident 9's medical record was reviewed.A physician's order with a start date of 1/28/26, documented, Catheter cares: Clean foley site with soap and water, check foley for kinks and that foley bag is being kept below the bladder and off the floor in privacy bag. every morning and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0622 — pattern
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 3 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that when the facility transferred or discharged a resident that the information provided to the receiving provided included: contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident; resident representative information including contact information; Advanced Directive information; all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care; all other necessary information, including a copy of the resident's discharge summary; and any other documentation to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Specifically, residents were transferred to the hospital and no documentation could be found of the information that was provided to the receiving provider. Resident identifier 32, 39 and 93. Findings included: 1. Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of fracture of lower end of left humerus. On 11/15/23, resident 39's medical records were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food in the refrigerator was not dated and labeled. In addition, there were soiled areas in the kitchen. Findings included: 1. On 11/13/23 at 11:07 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made: a. The floor in the bistro area under the cappuccino machine had black build up and debris in the corners. b. The doors and handles on the refrigerator in the bistro area were soiled. c. There was a container labeled Cream Cheese Frosting with no open date or expiration date in the walk in refrigerator. d. There was thawed Whipped Topping in the walk in refrigerator with no date when it was pulled from the freezer. The label revealed to use thawed Whipped Topping within 2 weeks. e. There was black substance in the corners of the kitchen, around table legs and under shelves throughout the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not consult with the resident's physician; and notify when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. Specifically, a resident expressed feelings of suicidal ideation and the physician was not notified. Resident identifier 39. Findings included: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of fracture of lower end of left humerus. On 11/15/23, resident 39's medical records were reviewed. On 9/7/23, resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00/15, which would indicate that the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. Review of resident 39's physician orders revealed the following: a. Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 milligram (mg) (Quetiapine Fumarate), give 12.5 mg by mouth every morning and at bedtime for Anxiety/Delusions. The order was initiated and discontinued on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the the allegation was made to the administrator, State Survey Agency (SSA), and Adult Protective Services. Specifically, a resident eloped from the facility and the State Survey Agency was not notified. Resident identifier 39. Findings included: Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of fracture of lower end of left humerus. On 11/15/23, resident 39's medical records were reviewed. On 9/7/23, resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00/15, which would indicate that the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment documented that resident 39 was a one-person limited assist for ambulation. On 9/10/2023 at 6:08 PM, the resident 39's progress note documented, Pt's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 23 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable. Specifically, a resident developed a new pressure ulcer after admission to the facility and interventions were not implemented specific to the prevention of its development. Resident identifier: 23. Findings included: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included displaced fracture of left humerus, syncope and collapse, chronic kidney disease, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, prediabetes, history of venous thrombosis, and long term use of anticoagulants. On 11/14/23 at 9:43 AM, an observation was made of resident 23. Resident 23 right lower extremity was positioned in a podus boot with a stocking over the top of the foot.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-12-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAPLE SPRINGS LIVING — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $454K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in UT