No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maple Springs Of Wasilla

3265 E Meridian Loop, Wasilla, AK 99654 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 67 certified beds · (907) 841-1217 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (907) 841-1217 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3719 E Meridian Loop · (907) 373-5940 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3190 E Meridian Park Loop Ste 110 · (907) 376-5700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
One Shop1.7 mi
1830 E Parks Hwy
Park
2472 N Seward Meridian Pkwy · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.0%16.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.8%1.4%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection9.7%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.9%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.7%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.6%19.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.1%14.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers18.7%6.9%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.0%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.8%18.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%0.5%1.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%85.5%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.271.001.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.731.361.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 275 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

70.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 114 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF70.9%CMS range 64.2–76.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.3%CMS range 5.4–11.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting81.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge83.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.5–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.54
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.14
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 65.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.30 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.79 to 1.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-03)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for 1 resident (#49), out of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, a staff failed to ensure the resident correctly applied non-skid socks as outlined in the care plan. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for a fall and/or injuries.Findings:Resident #49 Record review on 6/29/25-7/3/25 revealed, Resident #49 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included traumatic ischemia of muscle related to a fall (decrease in the blood supply to a muscle due to a traumatic injury), Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia (degenerative brain condition that affects muscle control and movement), and lumbosacral radiculopathy (pain in the lower back and hip that radiates down the back of the thigh into a leg caused by compressed nerve roots). Review of Resident #49's, Care Plan Report, initiated on 2/11/25, revealed: . [Resident #49] has an ADL [activities of daily living] self-care performance deficit. Interventions. DRESSING: The resident requires limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to administer a medication through the route ordered for 1 resident (#34), out of 16 sampled residents. This failed practice created a medication error and placed the resident at risk of adverse reactions.Findings:Resident #34Record review on 6/29/25-7/3/25 revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included intracranial (brain) injury, gastrostomy (a surgical procedure where a feeding tube called a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or PEG tube, is inserted through the abdominal wall to provide direct access into the stomach), and post-traumatic seizures.Review of Resident #34's eMAR (electronic medication administration record) revealed: .levETIRAcetam [an anti-seizure medication] Oral Solution 100 MG [milligram]/ML [milliliter] . Give 10 ml via PEG-Tube two times a day for seizure .-Start Date- .05/19/2025 0900 [9:00 AM] .An observation on 6/30/25 at 2:37 PM, revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) #1 prepared Levetiracetam oral solution in a medication cup. LN #1 asked the resident if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control procedures were properly implemented in the facility for 3 residents (#s 4, 54, and 58) out of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) used required personal protective equipment (PPE) while caring for residents (#'s 4 and 54) who were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP-the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities); and 2) ensure a clean environment during Resident #58's wound care. These failed practices placed the residents at risk of infection which could have affected their overall health and wellbeing.Findings:Use of PPEResident #4Record review on 6/29/25-7/3/25 revealed Resident #4 was placed on EBP due to the presence of an indwelling catheter (a medical device that drains urine from the bladder leading to a drainage bag).An observation on 6/30/25 at 3:42 PM, revealed a sign posted on the door outside of Resident #4's room. The sign read: STOP Enhanced Barrier Precautions Everyone Must:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0552 — widespread
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents right to be informed, in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment recommendations were upheld. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent [and] Risk/Benefit Statement forms, used for education and consent for psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), were completed accurately, timely, and by health care providers with an original signature for 9 sampled residents (#'s 6; 8; 15; 16; 18; 28; 33; 35; and 204) and 8 unsampled residents (#'s 2; 7; 19; 25; 31; 37; 41; and 105), out of 25 residents on psychotropic medications. This failed practice violated the resident's right to be informed and afforded the opportunity to ask questions of their health care provider and placed them at risk for unnecessary medication and/or adverse reactions. Findings: Record review on 6/16-21/24 revealed the facility used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-21 · tag F0711 — widespread
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure: 1) physicians completed the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - Physician orders that clarify life sustaining measures if needed, to include cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], initial treatment orders, and medically assisted nutrition) physician order forms with residents; and 2) were signed and dated with an original signature for 9 sampled residents (#'s 3; 6; 8; 17; 28; 33; 35; 38; and 204), out of 14 sampled residents reviewed; and 35 unsampled residents (#'s 2; 4; 5; 7; 11; 14; 21; 22; 24; 25; 26; 30; 31; 32; 34; 36; 37; 39; 40; 41; 42; 45; 46; 48; 49; 103; 104; 105; 203; 205; 206; 253; 254; 303; and 304), out of 39 unsampled residents reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to deny these residents to be offered life sustaining options by an authorized health care provider, placing them at risk for not understanding the risk and benefits of those options which could affect their overall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurately completed in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) The Psychotropic Medication Informed Consent [and] Risk/Benefit Statement forms, used for education and consent for psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), were completed accurately, timely, and by authorized health care providers with an original signature for 9 sampled residents (#'s 6; 8; 15; 16; 18; 28; 33; 35; and 204) and 8 unsampled residents (#'s 2; 7; 19; 25; 31; 37; 41; and 105), out of 25 residents on psychotropic medications in the facility. 2) The nursing staff accurately documented the removal of a medication patch for one resident (#41) out of 25 medication administrations reviewed. These failed practices created incomplete medical records and/or inaccurate documentation, which placed these residents at risk for inconsistencies in care and treatment provided. Findings: 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three residents' (#6; and #28) transfer notices were sent to the Alaska Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO). This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents, based on a census of 53, by: 1) denying residents the added protection from being inappropriately discharged ; 2) providing the residents with access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights; and 3) ensuring the Office of the State (LTCO) was aware of facility practices and activities related to transfers and discharges. Findings: Record review from 6/17-21/24 revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sepsis (an infection of the bloodstream), and quadriplegia (complete paralysis of the body from the neck down). Further review revealed the resident suffered from uncontrolled pain in the right hip. The staff observed Resident #6's right leg was abnormally shorter than the left leg. The provider ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented with smoking care needs for two residents (#'s 11, and 33), out of 14 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to address risk factors and include specific information concerning the residents' smoking in their care plans. This failed practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for harm. Findings: Resident #11 Record review on 6/17-21/24, revealed Resident #11 was admitted with diagnoses that included a right ankle fracture which was surgically fused making the joint immobile, diabetes, high blood pressure, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (below normal oxygen levels in the blood). An observation on 6/19/24 at 4:28 PM, revealed Resident #11 was outside by the dumpster listening to music and smoking. Review of the handwritten facility provided list of smokers, revealed Resident #11 was included on this list. Review of Resident #11's MDS (Minimum Data Set - A Federally required nursing assessment) admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised to meet the changing needs of 2 residents (#'s 10 and 18), out of 14 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to revise care plans to reflect: 1) the level of support needed during appointments for 1 resident (#10); 2) the interventions added for fall prevention for 1 resident (#18); and 3) the interventions trained to address behavioral/emotional needs for 1 resident (#18). These failed practices placed the residents at risk for less than the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident #10 - Level of Support Needed Record review on 6/17-21/24 revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included locked-in state (virtual total paralysis with retained consciousness), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident #10 was also not able to communicate verbally. Further review revealed Resident #10 was totally dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) to include bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two nursing staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] #3 and Licensed Nurse [LN] #7), out of 15 personnel records reviewed, had valid Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) certificates. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for not receiving timely CPR or emergency care when needed. Findings: CNA#3 Review of the personnel records on [DATE] at 3:16 PM, revealed CNA #3 was hired on [DATE] with an expired CPR certificate, dated 10/2023. Review of CNA #3's work schedule, revealed the CNA worked on the following dates: 5/15-16/24, [DATE], 5/21-24/24, [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], 6/4-6/24, and 6/10-12/24, with a total of 17 days worked without a valid CPR certificate. During an interview with the Human Resources Director (HRD) on [DATE] at 9:53 AM, the HRD stated CNA #3 was a new employee, but the HRD was not aware that CNA #3's CPR certificate was expired. The HRD stated she received CNA #3's CPR card that morning with a valid date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards and/or received adequate supervision. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) Ensure the care plan was followed regarding the total number of staff needed for safe bed mobility for 1 Resident (#6), out of 14 sampled residents; 2) Ensure neurological assessments, after unwitnessed falls, were conducted accurately for 1 Resident (#18), out of 14 sampled residents; and 3) Ensure 3 residents (#'s 11; 16; and 33), out of 3 residents reviewed for smoking, were assessed for safe storage of smoking paraphernalia (cigarettes and lighter or matches). These failed practices created a potential for accidents and injury to the residents. Findings: 1) Care Plan - Bed Mobility Resident #6 Record review on 6/17-21/24 revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition involving insulin resistance), osteomyelitis (bone infection), stage 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to complete a comprehensive admission assessment using the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally required nursing assessment for long term care residents) for one resident (#204), out of 14 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to cause inaccurate health and functional status for the resident, of which placed the resident at risk for inconsistent care. Findings: Record review on 6/17-21/24, revealed Resident #204 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Parkinsons disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and causes movement problems, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a form of dementia where abnormal amounts of protein deposits are located in the nerve cells of the brain affecting cognitive functioning). Review of Resident #204's MDS Summary, dated 6/11/24, revealed sections A (Identification), B (Hearing, Speech, and Vision), C (Cognitive Patterns),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive reassessment within 14 days after the Resident was diagnosed with dementia for one resident (#28) out of 14 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to decrease the resident's quality of life and jeopardized potential for maintaining functional independence at the highest possible level. Findings: Resident #28 Record review from 6/17-21/24 revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses that included cardiac arrest, and hypertensive heart disease (prolonged unmanaged high blood pressure) with heart failure. Further review revealed on 5/13/24, an additional diagnosis was added by the facility's provider of severe vascular dementia with psychotic disturbance (a condition caused by restricted blood flow to parts of the brain characterized by impaired reasoning, planning, judgement, and memory). Behaviors: Record review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) exercises were provided to 1 resident (#6), out of 14 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to place the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary care and therapy to maintain his/her level of mobility. Findings: Review on 6/17-21/24, revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included sepsis (an infection of the bloodstream) and quadriplegia (complete paralysis of the body from the neck down). During an interview on 6/17/24 at 2:19 PM, Resident #6 stated he/she had difficulty moving his/her arms. When asked if he/she had therapy, Resident #6 stated No. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally required nursing assessment) admission Assessment, dated 4/22/24, revealed: Section GG. Functional Limitation in Range of Motion A. Upper extremity 2=impairment on both sides, B. Lower extremity 2=impairment on both sides. Review of Resident #6's Care Plan, dated 4/15/24, revealed: Focus: . [Resident #6] has limited physical mobility related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review the drug regimen for 1 resident (#18), out of 14 sampled residents, for adequate parameters of a medication dose range order (orders in which there are dosing amount options over a prescribed range). This failed practice had the potential to expose the resident to unnecessary medications. Findings: Review on 6/17-21/24 revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility under hospice care for diagnoses that included dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation. Resident #18 had a history of stroke which had contributed to the decline of his/her dementia. Review of Resident #18's electronic medication administration record (eMAR), dated 6/2024, revealed the following pain medication: Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) Solution [liquid form of morphine, a narcotic used to treat moderate to severe pain] 20 milligrams [mg] / [per] milliliter [ml] - Give 0.25ml [or 5mg] by mouth every 2 hours as needed for moderate to severe pain/shortness of breath. Further review of this order revealed the following instructions that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food under proper sanitation and food handling practices in the central kitchen. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 55) at risk for foodborne illnesses and communicable disease. Findings: An observation of the central kitchen on 3/20/23 at 9:26 AM, revealed: 1) Walk in refrigerator: - Soiled whipped cream can 13 oz.; - Opened sour cream container, unlabeled with no used by date; - Opened 10-pound box of breakfast sausage with inner bag opened. The sausages were exposed to air; - Dried brown substance dripping down outer container of 1 gallon Lea and [NAME] Worcestershire sauce; - Dried brown substance dripping down outer container of 1 gallon Kikkoman soy container; - Dried brown substance dripping down outer container of 169 oz [NAME] balsamic vinegar; - Carton of Dr Pepper labeled Em taped to the carton. - Plastic container labeled Em taped to the container, contained two Fast Twitch energy drink…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-24 · tag F0836 — widespread
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure State Laws were followed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure individuals employed by the facility had a valid criminal history background check for 4 employees: 1) Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4; 2) Neighborhood Helper (NH) #1; 3) [NAME] #2; and 4) Housekeeper #1. This failed practice violated State background check Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) and placed all residents (based on a census of 55) at risk for receiving care and services from individuals with barrier crimes and no valid variance. Findings: Review of the facility's State of Alaska license revealed an effective date of 7/1/22 through 6/30/24. Review of the Alaska Department of Health Division of Health Care Services website, accessed at https://dhss.alaska.gov/health/dhcs/Pages/hflc/Background-Check.aspx, revealed: Background checks are required for all individuals associated with the facilities overseen by the Health Facilities Licensing & Certification Program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 5 residents (#'s 1; 24; 50; 155; and 305), out of 16 sampled residents, were assessed to determine safety prior to self-administration of medications. This failed practice placed the residents at risk of medication errors, and potential drug interactions. Findings: Review on 3/24/23 of the facility's policy Self-Administration of Medications, dated 12/2022, revealed: As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medication is clinically appropriate for the resident .In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment including (but not limited to) the resident's: a. Ability to read and understand medication labels; b. Comprehension for the purpose and proper dosage and administration time for his or her medications; c. Ability to remove medication from a container and to ingest and swallow (or otherwise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set- A federally required nursing assessment) accurately reflected the resident's status at the time of assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) complete a discharge assessment for 1 unsampled resident (#3), out of 1 reviewed for resident assessment; 2) assess for hearing aids for 2 residents (#'s 2 and 37), out of 16 sampled residents; 3) ensure oxygen therapy and/or CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) use were identified for 2 residents (#'s 37 and 50), out of 16 sampled residents; and 4) ensure a broken denture was identified for 1 resident (#304), out of 16 sampled residents. These failed practices placed the residents at risk for receiving an inaccurate care plan, interventions, and recieving less than optimal care. Findings: Resident #3 Record review on 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included heart failure. Review of the Interdisciplinary Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure care plans were individualized to meet the medical and psychosocial needs for 6 residents (#'s 2; 13; 34; 37; 50; and 304) out of 16 sampled residents. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for not receiving necessary services to address their individual needs. Findings: Resident #2 Record review on 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy and seizure disorder. During an interview on 3/21/23 at 1:11 PM, Resident #2 stated he/she had hearing aids, but they needed to be cleaned (of ear wax). Review of Admission/readmission Evaluation-V 5, dated 1/18/23 at 3:27 PM, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with hearing aids for both ears. Review of Resident #2's current care plan revealed no documentation of hearing deficit or hearing aids. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 2:14 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated the Resident's care plan should have included hearing and tasks with hearing aids so that staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed ensure respiratory care was consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 residents (#'s 37; 50; and 304), out of 16 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for inconsistent care, and potential respiratory complications. Findings: Resident #37 Record review on 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included pulmonary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure that affects arteries in the lungs and heart), saddle embolus of pulmonary artery with acute cor pulmonale (a large blood clot gets stuck where the main pulmonary artery branches off into a Y-shape to go into each lung causing the right side of the heart to fail), and diabetes. An observation on 3/20/23 at 2:54 PM, revealed a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine (a machine to help with obstructive sleep apnea, to ensure a person continues breathing while asleep) placed on Resident #37's bedside cabinet. The CPAP's mask was connected to an oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure patient care equipment was monitored to ensure it was in a safe operating condition. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) complete daily maintenance checks on 2 emergency code carts (emergency cart/equipment used for resuscitation); and 2) maintain and monitor a unit freezer. This failed practice: 1) placed residents residing in the facility, that were a full code, at risk for adverse outcomes in the event of malfunctioning emergency equipment, and 2) placed residents at risk for receiving food not stored at appropriate temperatures which increased the chance of food borne illnesses. Findings: Emergency Code Cart: Observations conducted 3/20-24/23 revealed incomplete daily code cart maintenance logs on 2 code carts (Hatchers code cart and Main code cart). - Hatchers code cart log for the month of March revealed it was checked 14 out of 23 days total. - Main code cart log for the month of March revealed it was checked 9 out of 23 days total. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 5:18 PM, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for psychotropic medications (medications in the class of either antipsychotics, antianxiety, or antidepressants that would have affected behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) prior to use for 1 resident (#1), out of 5 sampled residents for unnecessary medications. This failed practice denied the resident the right to consent to medications and be informed of the risk and benefits for medication use. Findings: Record review from 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, recurrent moderate and schizoaffective disorder (a combination of schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), depressive type. Review of Resident #1's current Physician Orders revealed an order for Duloxetine HCI Capsule [antidepressant] Delayed Release Particles 60 MG [;] Give 60 mg by mouth at bedtime related to MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, RECURRENT, MODERATE . with a start date of 10/22/22. Further review revealed no psychotropic medication informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights to self-determination were honored. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a method for storing perishable food brought in by family or visitors. This failed practice denied the residents the right to store perishable food brought into the facility. Findings: During a collaborative group meeting on 3/22/23 at 1:30 PM, residents of the facility voiced their concern that there was no way to store perishable food brought into the facility by family or visitors. The residents stated there was no refrigerator to store their food. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 2:06 PM, the Kitchen Manager stated that when residents asked for food to be stored/refrigerated it was a hard no and that no resident-owned food was kept in the kitchen. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 3:41 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was not a specific resident refrigerator maintained for resident food, as this would have required recording of temperatures and everyone having access. Review of the facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to resolve a grievance for 1 resident (#24) out of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, the resident's complaint was not fully resolved, and the resident did not receive a written grievance decision which included the steps taken to investigate the grievance and a summary of pertinent finding or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns. This failed practice denied the resident information regarding a resolution of the grievance. Findings: Record review from 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and seizure disorder. Further review revealed the Resident had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15, indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 3/21/23 at 8:40 AM, Resident #24 stated he/she had $800.00 (eight hundred dollars) go missing out of his/her wallet last month. When asked who he/she reported the missing money to, the Resident stated he/she reported this to the front desk and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure safety equipment was checked per manufacturer's instructions for 1 resident (#36) out of 1 resident sampled for wandering. Specifically, the wanderguard tag device (worn by the resident to alert the facility if the resident eloped) was checked monthly instead of weekly. This failed practice had the potential to cause harm if the resident wandered outside during a time the equipment was not functioning. Record review from 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, depression, and diabetes. During an interview on 3/20/23 at 2:47 PM, Resident #36's POA (power of attorney) stated he/she was called by the facility in the past because the Resident had wandered outside. The POA stated the Resident now has a wanderguard device in place. An observation on 3/22/23 at 9:30 AM revealed Resident #36 seated at the dining room table upstairs, wearing a wanderguard tag device on his/her ankle. During an interview on 3/23/23 at 11:43 AM, Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (#8) out of 2 residents sampled with a foley catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was assessed timely for discontinuation of the catheter. This failed practice had the potential to keep the device in place for longer than clinically necessary and increased the potential for the resident to develop a urinary tract infection. Findings: Record review from 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of the lower end of the right tibia (shinbone), diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Further review revealed the resident admitted to the facility with a foley catheter in place. During an observation on 3/20/23 at 3:14 PM, Resident #8 was observed lying in bed with a foley catheter hanging from the lower frame of his/her bed. During an interview on 3/20/23 at 3:17 PM, Resident #8 stated he/she was admitted to the long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure administration of enteral nutrition (a liquid diet delivered by way of tube feeding) was free of possible complications for 1 resident (#29), out of 2 residents observed for enteral nutrition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident's head of the bed was positioned no lower than 30 degrees in elevation during enteral feedings. This failed practice had the potential to cause aspiration (liquid entering the lungs). Findings: Record review from 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #29 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis or weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (lack of blood flow to the brain) affecting right dominant side and severe protein-calorie malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition). An observation on 3/20/23 at 10:02 AM, revealed Resident #29 lying in bed with an enteral feeding being administered at 80 milliliters per hour. Further observation revealed the head of the bed to be almost flat in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure reconciliation of a controlled drug (narcotic medication for pain) was accurate. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure liquid narcotic medication volume was accurately reconciled for 1 resident out of 8 residents sampled during medication cart review. This failed practice had the potential for inaccurate narcotic reconciliation. Findings: Narcotic Medication Reconciliation During an interview on 3/22/23 at 11:02 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the narcotics (controlled drugs) were kept in the medication cart on each unit. The DON further stated the nurses would have reconciled the controlled drugs at shift change. The DON stated the oncoming nurse and the outgoing nurse would have reconciled (counted) the amount of medication in the blister pack (a type of packaging in which a product is sealed in plastic, often with a cardboard backing) and the data was entered into the narcotic log book. During an interview on 3/22/23 at 1:30 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) # 1 stated the controlled drugs were kept in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure duplicative medications ordered for constipation, were written with adequate indications for use for 1 resident (#37), out of 16 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1) clear guidance on when to use Senna (medication used for constipation) in the bowel protocol; and 2) the as needed bowel medication orders included sequence for use. These failed practices had the potential to inadequately medicate the resident. Findings: Record review on 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and diabetes. During an interview on 3/20/23 at 2:56 PM, Resident #37 stated he/she received a stool softener every day, however he/she still struggled with constipation. Resident #37 described his/her bowel movements as hard stool and difficult to pass. Review of the facility's Bowel Protocol, undated, revealed the purpose of the protocol was To provide timely interventions to assist with prevention of constipation and other complications. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs used in the facility were labeled in accordance with accepted professional practices. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the label on the Melatonin (a supplement used for insomnia) blister pack for 1 discharged resident was not re-labeled as stock medication and put into use within 1 medication cart out of 3 medication carts observed. This failed practice placed all residents that received this medication from this cart at risk of misuse of prescribed medication. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 3/22/23 at 12:15 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN #2) showed the contents of the medication cart on his/her unit. Further observation revealed a bubble pack for Melatonin 1 MG tabs had a resident's name crossed out. Further observation revealed a handwritten note on the pack which read stock. When asked about the melatonin bubble pack label, LN #2 stated that resident was discharged , and the left-over medication was used as floor stock for other residents. During an interview on 3/24/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were accurate for 2 residents (#s 37 and 304), out of 16 sampled residents. This failed practice caused the residents to receive an incorrect diet which could have affected their overall health and wellbeing. Findings: Resident #37 Record review on 3/20-24/23 revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included pulmonary hypertension (a type of high blood pressure that affects arteries in the lungs and heart), saddle embolus of pulmonary artery (a large blood clot), and diabetes. Review of Resident #37's dietary card, dated 3/22/23, revealed: Diet: 2 Gm Na (low sodium). Review of Resident #37's electronic diet order, dated 3/16/23, revealed: NAS (No Added Salt) diet. Review of Resident #37's Order and Communication forms, dated 2/28/23, 3/4/23, and 3/7/23, all revealed a No Added Salt diet was checked as the diet order. Resident #304 Record review on 3/20 -24/23 revealed Resident #304 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart (heart conditions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-06-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was in a safe operating condition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer door's gasket (a flexible rubber strip that runs along the edge of the door to create an airtight seal) was without compromise. This failed practice placed all residents (based on a census of 53) at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings: Review on 6/17-21/24 revealed the facility's walk-in freezer was inside the facility's walk-in refrigerator. An observation, during initial kitchen tour, on 6/17/24 at 8:30 AM, revealed a puddle of free-standing water approximately 18 inches x 12 inches in the walk-in refrigerator, on the floor directly in front of the walk-in freezer door. Further observation revealed two dark gray strings of like-rubber pieces of material hanging off the bottom of the door, one approximately 1/4 inch by 6 inches long and the other approximately 1/4 inch by 3 inches long. During an observation on 6/18/24 at 8:45 AM, revealed the same puddle of free-standing water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-21 for 25 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAPLE SPRINGS LIVING — 3 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 2 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BRONSHIELD LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF9%since 03/01/2025
LARMED, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF8%since 03/01/2025
MAPLE SPRINGS OF MATSU HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST65%since 08/17/2017
MORPHEUS UNIVERSEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF9%since 03/01/2025
PISTIS MERCURYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF9%since 03/01/2025
DUNN, ELIZABETHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
DUNN, MARCIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/17/2017
LARSEN, GREGORYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/17/2017
LARSEN, LAURELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
LARSEN, RYANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/01/2025
DAHL, NATHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
LARSEN, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
MAPLE SPRINGS MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2019
JACHIMIEC, JESSICAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
PATH ACCOUNTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-60.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.9M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 42%Medicare 50%Other / private 8%

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,064per resident / day
operating cost
$32,335per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$662per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Alaska Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Alaska
$27,831/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)*
$9,882/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 025038. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next