Barnes Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 72% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 48.3 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 93 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the vent-a-hood in the kitchen was kept free of a buildup of grease, grime and debris which could result in improper functioning and/or fire resulting in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. This failed practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which caused or could have caused serious harm, injury, or death to all 51 residents who resided in the facility. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/06/23 at 05:02 PM. The facility also failed to ensure potentially hazardous items were stored in a secure location to prevent potential access by cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents for 1 (Resident #19/31) of 1 sampled resident; the mattress fit the bed for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 resident to prevent the potential for harm; and oxygen cylinders containing oxygen were stored and secured in an oxygen holder to prevent the potential for accidents/hazards. The findings are: 1. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean condition to minimize the risk of food borne illness; food products were used or removed prior to their expiration dates/viability; hands were washed between clean and dirty tasks and prior to applying gloves; dishes and utensils were cleaned prior to being used for residents during meal service; and food was stored in a manner that was free of exposure/contamination due to the presence of insects or rodents. This failed practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy, which caused or could have caused serious harm, injury, or death to all 51 residents who resided in the facility. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/06/23 at 05:02 PM. The facility also failed to ensure orange was stored in the refrigerator and hand washing was practiced when feeding residents snacks. The findings are: On 12/05/23 at 02:05 PM Surveyors observed initial kitchen rounds with Dietary Aide #1. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure essential equipment in the kitchen was maintained in safe, operational order to ensure food was kept at a safe temperature to minimize the risk of food borne illness. This failed practice resulted in Immediate Jeopardy which caused or could have caused serious harm, injury, or death to all 51 residents who resided in the facility due to the potential risk for food borne illness The Administrator was notified on 12/6/23 at 5:02 PM. The findings are: On 12/5/23 at 2:51 PM, in the first two door freezer there was a thick layer of ice observed in the bottom underneath multiple boxes of food items. The ice was covered in a variety of debris including food stuff. The ledge and bottom of the freezer contained dust and debris which extended to the vent and grate in the front of the freezer. The right side of the freezer contained a layer of ice 2 to 3 inches thick. Adhered to the bottom of the freezer was a bag containing a bright red food product that had been liquid at one time. The Dietary Aide was unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 7 (Residents #5, # 25, #16, #27, #41, #14, #22) of 11 sample mix residents. The findings are: Review of Resident #5's admission Record noted the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (slow and progressive disorder of the blood vessels), cerebral infarction(stroke) and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #5's Order Summary Report dated 1/8/2024 noted [anti-platelet medication name] Tablet 75 milligrams (MG) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for blood clot prevention; [nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) medication name] enteric coated (EC) tablet delayed release 81 MG give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for prophylactic. Review of Resident #5's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/23/2024 noted in section N0415. High Risk Drug Classes: Use and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed prior to admission to ensure the resident received the needed care and services in the most appropriate setting for 3 (Residents #16, #22,#32) of 4 sampled residents whose records were reviewed for PASRR screening information. The findings are: Review of Resident #16's [company name] letter, submitted by another facility, dated 5/14/2018, for a Level I application and the resident was considered a change of condition. Review of Resident #16's Division of Medical Services (DMS) 787 dated 6/11/2018 noted in Section II the resident had a diagnosis of Mental Retardation (MR)/ Intellectual Development disorder (IDD). Mental Retardation developed before the resident reached age [AGE], and the resident had a Developmental Disability before reaching the age of 22. Mental Illness section noted Resident #16 has a diagnosis of schizophrenia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to document and complete a person-centered care plan to facilitate the ability to plan and provide necessary care and services for 6 (Residents #32, 22, 27, 3, 7, 14) of 19 sampled residents whose Care Plans were reviewed. The findings include: A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #32 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, vascular dementia with behavior disturbance, psychosis, mood disorder, convulsions, anxiety disorder, and abnormal weight loss. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/19/2024, revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #32 was marked as having 2 or more falls since admit or prior assessment. A review of Resident #32's Care Plan, initiated on 06/22/2023, revealed the resident had a high potential for fall and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents who smoke have a smoking assessment for 2 (Resident #14, #41) of 2 sample mix residents reviewed for smoking and to ensure hand rolls were used for residents with contractures for 1 (Resident #27) of 1 sample mix residents reviewed for contractures and to ensure specialized shampoo was used during showers as ordered by physician instead of regular body wash for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 resident reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents. The finding are: During an interview with Resident #14 on 1/7/2025 9:11 AM, the resident stated there are smoking times and confirmed staff keep cigarettes and lighters. Resident #14 confirmed that they don't wear an apron when smoking. Review of Resident #14's admission Record noted the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of Resident #14's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure adequate nutrition and hydration was provided for dependent residents for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition and hydration status and weight loss. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Assistance with Meals, revised in September 2013, indicated that residents would receive assistance with meals to meet the individual needs of the resident and that resident who could not feed themselves would be fed with attention to safety, comfort, and dignity. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 with diagnoses that included down syndrome, seizures, abnormal weight loss, and dysphagia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/2024, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 and no staff assessment for mental status (SAMS) had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the freezer were covered, sealed, dated; manufacturer specification was followed; kitchen ceiling tiles were replaced, cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation; floors, dish washer, kitchen walls, were free of chipped and stains and dietary staff washed their hands before they handled clean equipment or food for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 1/6/25 at 10:01 AM, the following observations were made on a rack above the food preparation counter: a. An opened bag of cornmeal. The bag was not sealed. b. An opened box of baking soda. c. An opened bottle of dill weed. 2. On 1/06/25 at 10:11 AM, the following observations were made on a shelf in the 2-door freezer: a. An opened box of hamburger patties. The bag was not covered or sealed. b. An opened box of catfish. The box was not covered or sealed. c. An opened box of cod fish. The box was not covered or sealed. d. An opened box of veggie sausage. The box was not sealed or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy the facility failed to ensure bed linens were maintained in clean condition for two (Resident #28 and #36) of seven residents sampled for safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment. The findings are: A review of Resident #28 ' s admission report showed Resident #28 had diagnoses of bipolar, depressive episodes, stroke, and psychosis. A review of Resident #36 ' s admission report showed Resident #36 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and schizophrenia. During observations on 1/6/2025 at 10:37AM and 2:45PM, Resident #36 ' s bed on the right side of the room was covered with a blue bed spread that had white unknown substance scattered on top of the cover. The folded blue blanket at the head of the bed had an unknown dried smeared white stain on the top right corner. The side of the bed cover that hung towards the floor had unknown brownish stains along the middle third of the linen. During observations on 1/6/2025 at 10:38AM and 2:46PM, on the left side of Resident #36 ' s room, a second bed contained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) was completed for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed for preadmission screening due to diagnosis. Findings include: On 01/08/2025 at 9:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON), stated the facility did not have a policy for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #32 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia, vascular dementia, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and psychosis. Resident #32's actual admission date to the facility was 07/13/2020. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/19/2024, revealed Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Active diagnoses were marked for mood disorder, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia. The admission 5-day MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure family/responsible party and resident were included in the care plan process for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 resident reviewed for care plan meetings. The findings include: A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 with diagnoses that included down syndrome, abnormal weight loss, seizures, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/2024, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS was marked resident and family participation in assessment and goal setting. A review of Resident #47's Care Plan, initiated on 07/03/2023, revealed the resident/family or physician had determined the resident had a need for long term care. Interventions included: educate resident/family of benefits of nursing home care. A review of Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure treatment was provided for the left foot for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 resident reviewed for skin and wound treatments and care. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Policy, revised in April 2007 stated, all the resident's clinical record must have an order for over-the-counter medications and if ordered will be supported by the appropriate care processes and practices. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #47 with diagnoses that included down syndrome, seizures, abnormal weight loss and dysphagia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/2024, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 0 and no staff assessment for mental status had been completed. No area was marked for issues with the feet. A review of Resident #47's Care Plan, revised on 10/09/2023, revealed the resident had a slight risk for impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$34,623 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $34,623 — penalty dated 2023-12-28
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-27 for 48 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARSH POINTE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $188K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR