Betty Ann Nursing Center
1400 South Main Street, Grove, OK 74344 · For profit - Individual · 60 certified beds · (918) 786-2275 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $44,429 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.0% | 13.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 3.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 4.9% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.9% | 2.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.4% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.5% | 4.7% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.6% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 35.9% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 94.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.2% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 60.8% | 17.5% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.4% | 27.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.6% | 16.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.56 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.33 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 5.7–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 25.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 47.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 05/08/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to protect residents from abuse. The failure resulted in nine physical assaults by Res #2 on eight other residents between 01/03/25 and 05/01/25. On 05/08/25 at 5:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 05/08/25 at 6:04 p.m., the administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided the IJ template. On 05/09/25 at 9:06 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, 1. Resident # [2] is currently in inpatient psychiatric facility, [name withheld]. [NAME] Nursing Center is working with [name withheld] to find alternate placement for resident other than this facility. If alternative placement cannot be arranged prior to discharge, resident will return to [NAME] nursing center where [they] will remain under supervision of staff until other placement is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the health department within the required 2-hour timeframe for 1 (#1) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The DON reported the facility census was 53.Findings:An admission record, dated 08/06/25, showed Res #1 had diagnoses which included aphasia and weakness.A social service note, dated 08/20/25 at 11:44 a.m., showed Res #1 had signed the room change agreement form and moved from room [ROOM NUMBER]-A to room [ROOM NUMBER]-B.An Incident Report Form, dated 08/20/25, showed Res #1 reported they had been sexually abused by another resident. The inbound notification notation on the report showed it had been received by the health department on 08/20/25 at 5:23 p.m. The report showed local law enforcement was notified of the allegation on 08/20/25 at 1:40 p.m., and the facility began an investigation. The incident report showed that Res #1 had been moved to a different room on another hall for safety. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan for 1 (#2) of 9 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, read in part, Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the residents' conditions change. An admission record, dated 12/29/22, showed Res #2 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, depression, restlessness and agitation. A care plan, initiated 01/11/23, showed Res #2 had hit other residents on 01/03/25 and 04/10/25. No interventions have been added to this care plan since 01/11/23. An ODH form 283, dated 01/03/25, showed Res #9 yelled at Res #2 and Res #2 hit Res #9 in the side of the head. The form also showed the residents were separated and assessed for injuries and staff would monitor and intervene if behaviors were noted. An ODH form 283, dated 01/08/25, showed Res #2 was observed with one hand on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one (#1) of five sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The DON reported the census was 51. Findings: An Abuse and Neglect policy, dated 03/01/14, read in part, The facility will thoroughly investigate any and all allegations of abuse .The facility administrator will be designated as the abuse coordinator and will conduct and/or facilitate interviews of the direct resident(s) involved in the allegation, any interviewable residents, any staff associated with the allegation, and any visitors that have knowledge of or witnessed the allegation .A written report or statement will be gathered and maintained on all interviews. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia and anxiety disorder. A quarterly assessment, dated 10/10/24, documented Resident #1 was severely impaired for daily decision making. An OSDH Incident Report Form, dated 12/15/24, documented an allegation of abuse involving Resident #1 and an LPN in the resident's room. The investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure survey results were posted and accessible for residents and visitors. The DON identified 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An undated Survey Results policy, read in parts, .survey results are in the front lobby of the facility. The location of the facility survey results is identified with a sign posted on the cabinet. Any resident and or visitor will have access to the results if desired . On 10/01/24 at 2:57 p.m., four residents in the resident council meeting stated they did not know where survey results were located. On 10/01/24 at 3:15 p.m., survey results, or signage on where survey results were located, was not observed in the facility. On 10/01/24 at 3:17 p.m., the activities director stated they did not know where survey results were located. On 10/01/24 at 3:18 p.m., the administrator stated the survey results were located in the lobby, which was a locked area, away from resident rooms and common areas. On 10/01/24 at 3:20 p.m., the administrator stated some survey results were in the DONs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were completed for one (#150) and failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided a summary of the baseline care plan for one (#29) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Plans-Baseline policy, dated December 2016, read in part, .A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission .The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan . 1. Resident #150 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and pressure ulcer. On 09/30/24 at 11:23 a.m., Resident #150 stated they had recently admitted to the facility. Resident #150 stated they had not had a care plan meeting or received a summary of their baseline/initial plan of care. Review of the clinical record did not reveal a baseline care plan had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure holding temperatures were obtained for one (noon meal) of one meal observed for meal service. The DON identified 47 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. Findings: The undated Food Temperatures policy, read in part, .The temperatures of the food items will be taken and properly recorded for each meal . On 10/01/24 at 11:20 a.m., the noon meal service was observed. The Daily Food Temperature Log, dated 10/01/24 at 11:30 a.m., documented the noon meal food temperatures had been obtained. On 10/01/24 at 11:49 a.m., cook #1 was observed to plate the noon meal. Holding temperatures were not observed to be obtained by dietary staff from 11:20 a.m. through 11:49 a.m. [NAME] #1 stated they had obtained the temperature of the foods when they removed the food from the oven. [NAME] #1 stated they did not obtain holding temperatures before serving foods. On 10/01/24 at 12:11 p.m., the dietary manager stated food temperatures were to be obtained before they served every meal and they were to document…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were a smooth consistency for one (noon meal) of one meal observed for pureed foods. The DON identified two residents who received pureed diets. Findings: On 10/01/24 at 11:20 a.m., cook #1 was observed to puree the noon meal which consisted of turkey with gravy, dressing, mixed vegetables, bread, and lemon pudding. On 10/01/24 at 11:22 a.m., cook #1 was observed to place turkey and gravy into a food processor. The turkey and gravy was observed to contain visible pieces of food. The turkey with gravy was not observed to be a smooth consistency. [NAME] #1 stated, This is how I will serve it. On 10/01/24 at 11:28 a.m., cook #1 was observed to place dressing with gravy into a food processor. The dressing was observed to contain visible pieces of food, some the size of a pencil eraser. The dressing was not observed to be a smooth consistency. [NAME] #1 placed the dressing onto the steam table. On 10/01/24 at 11:32 a.m., cook #1 was observed to place mixed vegetables (which consisted of green beans, carrots,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. foods were covered and dated in the refrigerator for one of three refrigerators observed in the kitchen; b. infection control was maintained during meal service for one (the noon meal) of one meal observed during meal service; c. infection control was maintained when meals were delivered to residents who ate in their rooms for one of two meals observed during dining; and d. the ice machine was maintained in a sanitary manner for one of one ice machines observed. The DON identified 47 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. Findings: The undated Food Storage policy, read in parts, .Refrigeration .All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated . The undated, Cleaning Instructions Cleaning Ice Machine and Scoop policy, read in part, .The ice machine and equipment [scoops] will be cleaned on a regular basis to maintain a clean, sanitary condition . The Assisting the Resident with In-Room Meals policy, dated December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control protocols for enhanced barrier precautions were maintained during medication administration and wound care. The DON identified nine residents who were on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 10/01/24 at 12:02 p.m., LPN #2 and LPN #3 were observed during medication administration for insulin and blood sugar monitoring. LPN #2 donned PPE for room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident A, who was on EBP. LPN #2 was given the supplies to check the blood sugar for Resident B. After LPN #2 obtained the blood sugar results, they handed the used supplies to LPN #3 who discarded them, donned new gloves, and provided LPN #2 with the supplies needed for checking the blood sugar for Resident A. LPN #2 did not remove their gloves, or sanitize their hands prior to checking the blood sugar of Resident A. The used supplies were then handed back to LPN #3. LPN #3 then provided supplies and drew up the insulin for LPN #2, who observed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident mobility was included in the resident assessment and the plan of care for one (#29) of one sampled residents who was reviewed for mobility and positioning. The DON identified seven residents with limited range of motion. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included cerebral vascular accident, osteoarthritis, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis. An admission assessment, dated 08/02/24, did not document the impairment to the left upper extremity. Review of the clinical record revealed the comprehensive care plan had not been developed. On 08/03/24 at 2:00 a.m., a Health Status Note, documented Resident #29 admitted to the facility with a noted weak left hand and did not have a grasp due to a CVA. A Functional Abilities and Goals Assessment, dated 08/03/24, documented Resident #29 had no impairment to the upper or lower body. A Functional Abilities and Goals Assessment, dated 09/23/24, documented Resident #29 had impairment to the upper and lower left side. On 09/30/24 at 10:32 a.m., the left hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for one (#29) of 23 sampled residents who were reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The administrator identified 47 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included cerebral vascular accident, osteoarthritis, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis. A Care Plan, initiated 08/02/24, documented focus for DNR status and indwelling catheter. No other concerns were documented on the comprehensive care plan. An admission assessment for Resident #29, dated 08/15/24, documented ten areas of concern for care planning as follows: cognitive loss/dementia, ADL functional/rehabilitation potential, urinary incontinence and indwelling catheter, behavioral symptoms, falls, nutritional status, dehydration fluid maintenance, dental care, pressure ulcer, and psychotropic drug use. Only one of the concerns were included in the comprehensive care plan. On 10/03/24 at 8:47 a.m., the DON stated a comprehensive care plan should have been developed and did not know the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised and updated for one (#14) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 47 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #14 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer of left heel and diabetes type II. The care plan for Resident #14 documented a wound to the left heel was initiated 02/21/24 and resolved 04/24/24. The care plan did not document any further updates for pressure ulcers or deep tissue injuries. A Physician's Order, dated 09/06/24, documented to cleanse the wound with wound cleanser, pat dry then apply Santyl External Ointment 250 UNIT/GM (Collagenase) to the right heel topically one time a day for wound care, and cover with silicone border dressing daily until resolved. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/24/24, documented Resident #14 had no deep tissue injuries or pressure wounds. On 10/02/24 at 9:53 a.m., wound care was observed for Resident #14. The left heel wound was observed to be a closed wound, dark in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent reduction in range of motion/mobility for one (#29) of one sampled residents who were reviewed for range of motion/mobility. The DON identified seven residents who had limited range of motion. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction. The admission assessment, dated 08/02/24, documented no impairments to the upper or lower body. A Progress Note, dated 08/03/24 at 2:00 a.m., documented Resident #29 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with noted left hand weakness and without grasp due to a cerebral vascular accident. On 10/02/24 at 8:30 a.m., CNA #1 stated Resident #29 did not allow them to do anything with their hand. They stated they had not seen anything in their room for the left hand. On 10/02/24 at 8:35 a.m., LPN #1 stated Resident #29 was new to them. They stated the resident had no limitation in range of motion and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure supplements were offered/documented for one (#29) of one sampled residents who was reviewed for nutrition. The dietary manager identified 14 residents who was ordered supplements in the facility. Findings: Resident #29 had diagnoses which included moderate protein calorie malnutrition. The Dietician's Recommendation for Primary Care Providers form, dated 08/17/24, documented the resident was 26% below ideal body weight, had a diagnosis of protein calorie malnutrition, and recommended a supplement twice daily between meals. The physician agreed with the dietician recommendation. The electronic clinical record, dated 08/02/24, documented the resident's weight was 145 pounds. A Physician's Order, dated 08/20/24, documented the resident was ordered a dietary supplement between meals. A Physician's Order, dated 08/23/24, documented the resident was ordered Ensure three times per day. The electronic clinical record, dated 09/05/24, documented the resident's weight was 135.2 pounds, which indicated a 6.76 % weight loss in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered by the physician for one (#36) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #36 had diagnoses which included dementia, mood disorder, and unspecified psychosis. The Physician's Order, dated 04/23/24, documented to obtain a lipid panel and PSA for annual labs. The Progress Note, dated 04/26/24, documented the resident had refused lab for three days. Review of the clinical record revealed the resident had complied with obtaining labs twice in June 2024 and three times in July 2024. The labs obtained did not include a PSA for annual labs per the physician's order. On 10/01/24 at 9:35 a.m., the ADON stated the lipid panel was completed in June 2024, but they would need to look for the lab results for the PSA. The ADON stated the resident would initially refuse labs, but after they talked to the resident and explained the lab to them they were compliant and agreeable to obtaining labs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hot foods were served at palatable temperatures for one (#29) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for food. The DON identified 47 residents who received nourishment from the kitchen. Findings: The undated Food Temperatures policy, read in part, .Temperatures should be taken periodically to ensure hot foods stay above 140 [degrees] F and cold foods stay below 40 [degrees] F during the portioning, transporting and serving process until received by the resident . On 09/30/24 at 10:35 a.m., Resident #29 stated hot foods were served cold all the time. The resident stated they ate their meals in their room. On 10/02/24 at 11:51 a.m., the hall trays were observed to be prepared and ready for service on a metal cart with a plastic zippered cover. A test tray was placed on the hall cart. The noon meal consisted of penne pasta with chicken and alfredo sauce, green beans, bread, and spiced apples. On 10/02/24 at 12:04 p.m., CNA #2 was observed to obtain the hall cart from the dining room and begin delivering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure code status orders were accurately documented for two (#23 and #51) of three residents sampled for advance directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated [DATE], documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #23 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and hypertension. A facility Advance Directive policy, dated [DATE], documented in part .Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominent in the medical record .The director of nursing or designee will notify the attending physician of advance directives so that the appropriate orders can be documented in the resident's medical record and plan of care . A facility Do Not Resuscitate Order policy, dated [DATE], documented in part, .Do not resuscitate orders must be signed by the resident's Attending Physician on the physician's orders sheet maintained in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of vital signs out of parameter per physician orders for two (#41 and #46) of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/24/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #41 had diagnoses which included hypertension. A physician order, dated 06/29/23, documented to administer amlodipine 5 mg two times per day for hypertension. The order documented to hold the medication for systolic blood pressure less then 100 or diastolic blood pressure less than 60 and notify the primary care physician. A physician order, dated 06/29/23, documented to administer losartan 50 mg two times per day for hypertension. The order documented to hold the medication for systolic blood pressure less then 100 or diastolic blood pressure less than 60 and notify the primary care physician. The July 2023 MAR documented the amlodipine and losartan were held eight out of 50 opportunities for blood pressure parameters. A record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physical environment of the facility was kept clean and maintained in good repair. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/24/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/24/23 at 10:36 a.m., upon entrance to the facility the wood laminate floor was observed to be missing and buckled. On 07/25/23 at 9:11 a.m., a tour of the front shower room was conducted. The following observations were made: a. the base board was missing on the wall adjacent to the hand sink. There was an accumulation of black residue on the wall, b. material was peeling off of the hand sink cabinet and the cabinet was warped, and c. there was an accumulation of black residue on the floor around the hand sink cabinet. On 07/25/23 at 9:16 a.m., a tour of the shower room on the back hall was conducted. The following observations were made: a. material was peeling off of the floor, b. base board tiles were missing, and c. there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update care plans for changes in treatment for two (#23 and #27) of 13 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/24/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #23 had diagnoses which included hypertension and localized edema. A physician order, dated 04/18/23, documented to discontinue Lasix (a diuretic). A care plan, revised 05/11/23, documented the resident was at risk for alteration in cardiac function related to hypertension and use of diuretics. The care plan documented to administer medications for localized edema and to monitor for side effects of Lasix. On 07/25/23 at 12:37 p.m., the DON stated she had not noticed the diuretic was discontinued on the care plan review. 2. Res #27 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, C-diff, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A physician order, dated 07/18/23, documented to administer Vancomycin 125 mg by mouth every six hours for C-diff (contagious infection of the large…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. change a resident's catheter as ordered by the physician, b. obtain an order to change a resident's catheter, catheter bag, and tubing, and c. provide catheter care every shift for one (#39) of one sampled resident reviewed for catheters. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/24/23, documented five residents who had internal or external catheters. Findings: The Catheter Care, Urinary policy, revised 09/2014, read in parts, .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .The date and time that catheter care was given .The name and title of the individual(s) giving the catheter care . Res #39 had diagnoses which included urinary retention. A physician order, dated 04/11/23, documented to change Foley catheter 16 Fr/10 cc bulb one time a day every 30 days. A care plan, dated 04/11/23, documented the resident had an urinary catheter. It documented to provide catheter care every shift per policy. There was no documentation catheter care was provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. The Catheter Care, Urinary policy, revised 09/2014, read in parts, .Infection Control .Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor . Res #39 had diagnoses which included urinary retention. A physician order, dated 04/11/23, documented to change Foley catheter 16 Fr/10 cc bulb one time a day every 30 days. On 07/24/23 at 12:16 p.m., Res #39 was observed in their wheelchair in the dining room. Their catheter bag below their wheelchair and was resting on the floor. On 07/24/23 at 12:47 p.m., Res #39 was observed propelling themselves in their wheelchair down the hall from the dining room to their room. Their catheter bag below their wheelchair was dragging the floor. On 07/25/23 at 9:19 a.m., Res #39 was in their bed. Their catheter bag was observed resting on the floor on the side of their bed. On 07/25/23 at 9:25 a.m., CNA #1 was asked how residents' catheter bags were to be stored. They stated they should be stored off of the floor. They were asked if Res #39's catheter was off of the floor. CNA #1 looked at the resident's catheter and stated they forgot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure transfers were performed safely for one (#46) of three residents sampled for accidents. Findings 1. Res #46 had diagnoses which included cerebral palsy and physical debility. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was totally dependent on two staff for transfers. On 07/24/23 at 11:53 a.m., Res #46 was observed during a transfer from their bed to their wheelchair. The resident was observed being transferred via a full body lift. The staff were observed lifting the resident from the bed and moving the lift to rest above the resident's wheelchair. CNA #2 was observed tilting the empty wheelchair onto its back wheels and moving it under the lift. CNA #1 was observed lowering the resident into the wheelchair with the front wheels held off of the ground. CNA #2 lowered the wheelchair as the resident's weight shifted the front wheels to the ground. On 07/24/23 at 12:03 p.m., CNA #2 was asked about the procedure for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders for one (#16) of four residents sampled for medication pass. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/24/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #16 had diagnoses which included dementia, stroke, benign brain tumor, and communication disorder. A physician order, dated 06/05/20, documented to administer tamsulosin 0.4 mg tablet daily for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A physician order, dated 06/05/20, documented to administer magnesium oxide 400 mg tablet twice daily for replacement. A physician order, dated 06/06/20, documented to administer clopidogrel 75 mg tablet daily for stroke. A physician order, dated 06/06/20, documented to administer finasteride 5 mg tablet daily for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A physician order, dated 06/06/20, documented to administer folic acid 1 mg tablet daily for anemia. A physician order, dated 06/06/20, documented to administer multivitamin tab daily for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate below five percent. A total of 41 opportunities were observed with 16 errors. Total medication error rate was 39.02%. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/24/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #16 had diagnoses which included dementia, stroke, benign brain tumor, and communication disorder. A physician order, dated 06/05/2020, documented to administer tamsulosin 0.4 mg tablet daily for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A physician order, dated 06/05/2020, documented to administer magnesium oxide 400 mg tablet twice daily for replacement. A physician order, dated 06/06/2020, documented to administer clopidogrel 75 mg tablet daily for stroke. A physician order, dated 06/06/2020, documented to administer finasteride 5 mg tablet daily for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A physician order, dated 06/06/2020, documented to administer folic acid 1 mg tablet daily for anemia. A physician order, dated 06/06/2020, documented to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain labs as ordered by the physician for one (#39) of five sampled residents reviewed for lab services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/24/23, documented 51 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #39 had diagnoses which included mood disorder. A physician order, dated 04/25/23, documented VPA level every two weeks, then monthly for therapeutic medication monitoring. There was no documentation the VPA level was obtained every two weeks. On 07/25/23 at 1:53 p.m., the DON was asked to locate documentation where the VPA level was collected every two weeks after the physician ordered the labs. On 07/25/23 at 4:58 p.m., the ADON stated they did not find documentation the labs were collected.
- Potential for harm · F2020-01-14 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the surety bond was at an amount to cover the total amount of monies in the trust account for 53 of 53 residents who were identified as having a personal funds account with the facility. Findings: The daily balance for resident funds was reviewed for 11/2019, 12/2019, and 01/2020. The highest balance documented was $58,100. The bank statements documented the facility trust account was more than the surety bond every day from 11/15/19 to present. On 01/14/20 at 12:07 p.m., the business office manager (BOM) was asked for documentation of a surety bond. The BOM provided a copy of a surety bond dated 05/04/16 with no documented expiration date. The attached surety rider documented the bond was decreased to $30,000. The BOM asked how much money was in the account at this time. She stated $38,000. She was asked if it should cover the entire amount in the account. She stated yes. She was asked if the $30,000 covered the monies in the trust account. She stated no. She stated she checked the balance amounts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean ice machine. The facility identified 53 residents who obtained ice from the ice machine. Findings: On 01/08/20 at 3:45 p.m., the dietary manager was asked to open the top portion of the ice machine. She stated maintenance was responsible for cleaning the top. She was asked to have maintenance open the top. At 4:00 p.m., maintenance #1 opened the top of the ice machine. Upon inspection a white cloth was used to wipe the inside of the water reservoir. A slimy substance of black, yellow, and brown colors were observed on the water reservoir wall. He was shown the cloth. He stated that it was soiled and he would clean it. On 01/08/20 at 4:15 p.m., maintenance #1 was asked how he cleaned the machine. He stated he followed the manufacturer's recommendation. He stated the only thing he cleaned it with was water and a de-scaler. He was asked if he used the de-scaler that time. He provided no response. He began cleaning the ice machine again. The maintenance log for monthly ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide care and services according to the resident's plan of care for one (#39) of ten residents sampled for care provision. The facility failed to notify a resident's physician of results of low finger stick blood sugars (FSBS). The facility identified 12 residents who had orders for FSBS. Findings: Resident #39 had a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus and vascular dementia. A physician's order, dated 11/20/19, documented the resident was to have his finger stick blood sugar obtained before meals and at bedtime. The order documented to notify the physician if the resident's FSBS was below 70. The resident's 12/2019 injection administration records documented the resident's FSBSs were below 70 three times that month. There was no documentation in the resident's clinical record the resident's physician was notified of the FSBS results. The resident's 01/2020 injection administration records documented the resident's FSBSs were below 70 four times that month. There was no documentation in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement an infection control program to prevent potential infections for eight (#8, #27, #36, #48, #50, #53, #54, and #106) of 22 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to: a. provide treatment of a pressure ulcer in a manner to prevent infection for resident (#36), b. failed to perform hand hygiene in a manner to prevent cross contamination during the medication pass for seven (#8, #27, #48, #50, #53, #54, and #106). The facility identified 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #36 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer to the right inner ankle and idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy. A physician's order, dated 01/05/20, documented, .Clean right inner ankle with SNS [sterile normal saline] and pat dry with gauze sponges. Using a sterile cotton tipped applicator apply thin layer of gentamicin ointment into wound bed, then using a sterile cotton tipped applicator apply nickel sized about [sic] of santyl into wound bed, cover with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-01-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights in resident rooms and bathrooms were functional for six (#2, #18, #25, #32, #42, and #51) of the 24 residents whose call lights were checked. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 01/08/20 at 10:44 a.m., the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] for resident #32 was observed. The call light in the room was not in working order. The resident was asked about the call light. She stated it had stopped working the night before. She was asked what she would do if she needed help. She stated she could get up and she would yell for help. At 11:03 a.m., the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] for resident #2 was observed. The call light in both the room and bathroom were not working. The resident was asked what she would do if she needed help. She stated she would yell for help. At 11:20 a.m., the call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] for resident #25 was observed. The call light in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$44,429 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $44,429 — penalty dated 2025-05-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARSH POINTE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 3.8 | -2.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OKLAHOMA FINANCIAL LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 35% | since 07/30/2020 |
| OKLAHOMA OPERATING LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 65% | since 07/30/2020 |
| BROGDON, CONNIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 65% | since 07/30/2020 |
| BROGDON, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/29/2011 |
| NICHOLS, CHERYL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2016 |
| MARSH POINTE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2014 |
| SLAYTON, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/29/2011 |
| TIDWELL, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $206K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375457. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.