Vi At Silverstone, A Vi And Plaza Companies Commun

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 148 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 24 beds and averages 19.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.32 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.32 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.13 to 1.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 2 Number of residents cited: 2 Based on observation, staff interviews, clinical record review, review of facility's documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was not greater than 5 percent. Observed 2 medication errors out of 25 which resulted in an 8 percent error rate. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving medications inappropriately and could place the residents at risk for health illnesses. Findings include: -Regarding Resident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate), dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. The Resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3.0, indicating that the Resident was severely impaired. The assessment also revealed that the Resident did not have a swallowing disorder. A review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
  Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: facility staffNumber of residents cited: facility staff Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that 3-staff members (#44, #168, #182) received training on emergency preparedness. The deficient practice could result in staff inappropriately trained regarding emergency preparedness and could place the residents and other individuals at risk for their health and safety.Findings include:On 5/28/2026, the training on emergency preparedness was requested for 3- staff members.-Regarding the Dietary Server (Staff #44):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #44 was hired on 12/16/2024.The transcript history document for the year 2025 for Staff #44 revealed that the training on emergency preparedness was not listed. Per the document, it is not known when Staff #44 took his emergency preparedness annual training.-Regarding the Physical Therapy Assistant (Staff #168):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #168 was hired on 08/01/2024.The transcript document for Staff #168…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0942 — pattern
  Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that 3-staff members (#44, #168, #182) received annual training on resident rights. The deficient practice could result in staff inappropriately trained regarding resident rights and could place the residents at risk for their safety.Findings include:On 5/28/2026, the training on resident rights was requested for 3- staff members.-Regarding the Dietary Server (Staff #44):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #44 was hired on 12/16/2024.The transcript history document for the year 2025 for Staff #44 revealed that the training on resident rights was not listed. Per the document, it is not known when Staff #44 took his resident rights annual training.-Regarding the Physical Therapy Assistant (Staff #168):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #168 was hired on 08/01/2024.The transcript document for Staff #168 revealed that the training on resident rights was not listed. Per the document, it is not known when Staff #168 took the resident rights annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0943 — pattern
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that 2-staff members (#44, #182) received annual training on abuse, neglect and exploitation. The deficient practice could result in staff inappropriately trained regarding abuse, neglect and exploitation and could place the residents at risk for their safety.Findings include:On 5/28/2026, the training on abuse, neglect and exploitation was requested for 2- staff members.-Regarding the Dietary Server (Staff #44):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #44 was hired on 12/16/2024.The transcript history document for the year 2025 for Staff #44 revealed that the training on abuse, neglect and exploitation was not listed. Per the document, it is not known when Staff #44 took his abuse, neglect and exploitation annual training.-Regarding the Speech Therapist (Staff #182):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #182 was hired on 01/05/2026.The transcript document for Staff #182 revealed that the training on abuse, neglect and exploitation was not listed. Per the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
  Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that 4-staff members (#44, #92, #168, #182) received annual training on infection control. The deficient practice could result in staff inappropriately trained and could place the residents at risk for infection.Findings include:On 5/28/2026, the training on infection control was requested for 4- staff members.-Regarding the Dietary Server (Staff #44):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #44 was hired on 12/16/2024.The transcript history document for the year 2025 for Staff #44 revealed that the training on infection control was not listed. Per the document, it is not known when Staff #44 took his infection control annual training.-Regarding the Lifestyle Manager (Staff #92):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #92 was hired on 03/23/2022.The transcript history document for the year 2024 for Staff #92 revealed that her training on infection control was completed on 12/31/2024. Further, Staff #92's 2025 transcript revealed that her training on infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-28 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — pattern
  Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of facility documentation and policy, the facility failed to ensure that 3-staff members (#44, #168, #182) received annual training on behavioral health training related to dementia care. The deficient practice could result in staff inappropriately trained regarding behavioral health training related to dementia care and could place the residents at risk for their health and safety.Findings include:On 5/28/2026, the training on behavioral health training related to dementia care was requested for 3- staff members.-Regarding the Dietary Server (Staff #44):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #44 was hired on 12/16/2024.The transcript history document for the year 2025 for Staff #44 revealed that the training on behavioral health training related to dementia care was not listed. Per the document, it is not known when Staff #44 took his behavioral health training related to dementia care annual training.-Regarding the Physical Therapy Assistant (Staff #168):A review of the staffing list revealed that Staff #168 was hired on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, facility documentation, and policies and procedures, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for one resident (#5) regarding rehabilitation services. The deficient practice could result in the residents' care and services not being met according to their assessed needs so that the resident can attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The universe was 18 and the sample size was 1.Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of mobility and gait. A physician order with a start date for February 5, 2026 revealed a Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) order to evaluate and treat. No frequency or end date were included in the order.A care plan dated March 30, 2026 identified a problem area for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care deficit related to impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, resident and staff interviews, observations, facility documentation, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan for one resident (#5) was reviewed and revised to meet the resident's needs regarding occupational therapy services. The deficient practice could result in care or services that do not meet residents' needs. The universe was 18 and the sample size was 1. Findings include:Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, muscle weakness, and abnormalities in mobility and gait. A physician's order dated February 05, 2026 revealed a physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) order to evaluate and treat. The order did not specify the frequency of therapy services. A care plan dated March 30th, 2026 revealed a problem area for activities of daily living (ADLs) due to impaired mobility and left sided weakness. Approaches included physical assistance as needed and PT and OT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews and observations, the facility failed ensure proper nail care was provided for one resident (5). The deficient practice could result in grooming and hygiene needs not being met. The universe was 18, and the sample size was 1.Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, muscle weakness, abnormalities of mobility and gait.Review of care plan dated March 30, 2026 revealed activities of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to impaired independence of functional mobility, and requires assistance with ADLs. Interventions include physical assist as needed.A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed impairment for the resident's upper and lower extremities on one side, dependent for bathing and showers, and required substantial or maximal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#5) was provided with occupational therapy treatment and services per physician orders in accordance with professional standards of practice. The deficient practice could result in care or services resulting in an actual or potential decline in residents' physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well being. The universe was 18 and the sample size was 1. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and polyneuropathy.A physician order start date for February 5, 2026 revealed a Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) order to evaluate and treat. No frequency or end date were included in the order.A care plan dated March 30, 2026 identified a problem area for restorative passive range of motion (PROM) to maintain joint function, prevent stiffness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VI LIVING — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $431K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ