Vi At La Jolla Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 293 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.26 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.42 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtained written consent for the use of a bed/chair sensor alarm (a device that detects movement or pressure changes to alert staff for residents at risk of falling) [Resident 51] and for the use of an antipsychotropic medication (treats mental health illnesses such psychosis and schizophrenia) [Resident 1] for two of seven residents reviewed for Resident Rights. This failure had the potential for residents and their responsible parties (RP-a designated person chosen by the resident to represent them in medical and financial decisions), to be uninformed of the risk versus the benefits, for the recommended treatment.1. Resident 51 was admitted to the facility 7/25/2025, after multiple falls at home per the facility's admission Record. Resident 51 had an RP listed on the admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 51 in her room on 8/25/25 at 11:06 A.M. Two staff were in the room, assisting the resident to a wheelchair. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) were done related to the use of an antidepressant (medication used to treat depression) for one of five residents (Resident 1) reviewed for unnecessary medications.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive unnecessary medications, or more medication than necessary to treat depression (feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities).Findings:A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (also known as depression). A review of Resident 1's physician's orders indicated the following psychotropic medications:-bupropion hydrochloride tablet extended release 24 hr. (hour); (generic for Wellbutrin XL, a medication to treat depression) 150 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth, once a day: Special Instructions: dx:(diagnosis) depression AEB (as evidenced by) decreased motivation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an activity program to meet the interests of one of one residents reviewed for activities (Resident 3). As a result, Resident 3 was at risk for psychosocial isolation and boredom. Findings:Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities), per the Resident Face Sheet.An observation and interview was conducted on 8/25/25 at 9:49 A.M. with Resident 3 and his private duty caregiver (PCG 1). Resident 3 was in bed, asleep. PCG 1 stated he was with the Resident 3 five days a week to ensure he was safe and getting good care from the facility. PCG 1 stated Resident 3 was from the Memory Care unit due to his dementia, and he normally was very engaged in activities there. PCG 1 stated since Resident 3 had been on the skilled nursing unit, the Life Enrichment staff dropped off a paper with a list of activities for the day, but they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure medications were documented according to professional standards of practice for two of five Resident (8,36) sampled residents reviewed for pharmacy services when:1. Documentation of controlled medication (drugs with high abuse potential) was not documented the same time as it was administered to Resident 36.2. Controlled medication prescribed to Resident 8 could not be accounted for when a controlled medication was wasted without a second nurse signature.Findings:1. A review of Resident 36's clinical record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE].On 8/26/25 at 11:08 A.M., an interview and review of Resident 36's clinical record with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 was conducted. A review of Resident 36's physician order for Tramadol (controlled medication used to alleviate pain) 50 mg, take half a tablet by mouth every eight hours as needed for pain. A review of July 2025 CDR (controlled drug record, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled resident (Resident 31) were free of unnecessary medications when Resident 31 received anticoagulant (blood thinner) medications without monitoring for signs and symptoms of side effects.This deficiency had the potential to cause harm due to lack of monitoring for negative side effects of anticoagulant therapy, including excessive bleeding or bruising.Findings: A review of Resident 31's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic condition where the heart muscle cannot pump blood effectively) and atrial fibrillation (A-Fib, condition where the heart beats out of rhythm).A review of Resident 31's physician's order, dated 7/30/25, for Eliquis (apixaban, an anticoagulant) 5 milligrams (mg) take 1 tablet by mouth BID (twice a day) for A-Fib.A review or Resident 31's care plan dated 8/8/25, indicated, Approach: Observe for signs of active bleeding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure medication storage cabinet was free from an expired medication.This failure had the potential for medication to have reduced effectiveness and/or medication misuse.Findings: On 8/25/25 at 2:44 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with a Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 during a medication storage room tour on the third floor. An expired medication bottle labeled Sodium Chloride (salt) Tablets with an expiration date 6/2025 was stored with unexpired medications in the same cabinet. LN 1 acknowledged the medication expired on 6/2025 and should have been discarded. On 8/25/25 at 2:53 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) during a medication storage room tour on the third floor. The ADON acknowledged Sodium Chloride bottle was expired on 6/2025. The ADON stated medication cabinet should be checked monthly for expired medications. The ADON stated she would discard the medication. The ADON stated her expectation was for all expired medication to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect one (Resident 1) of four Residents' PHI (protected health information) when Resident 1 was sent out to the emergency room with wrong resident information and documents.As a result, HIPPA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act- a U.S. federal law protecting sensitive patient health information from disclosure without the patient's consent or knowledge) was violated and allowed unconsented disclosure of another resident's PHI. Findings:Review of complaint intake indicated .[Name of SNF] sent a patient to .emergency department with the paperwork of another resident. The correct patient was Resident 1 and he arrived with another patient's chart and medical information, this patient whose chart was brought in with the wrong patient was Resident 2 .Review of facility's Face Sheet for Resident 1indicated that he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Metabolic Encephalopathy (a condition where brain dysfunction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications to the correct resident for one of two sampled residents (1). This failure placed Resident 1 at an increased risk of low blood pressure. Findings: Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). On 5/7/25 at 9:40 A.M., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, on 4/25/25 Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 administered propranolol (a medication to treat heart problems and high blood pressure) and losartan (a medication to treat high blood pressure) to the wrong resident (Resident 1). The DON further stated, the error occurred because LN 2 thought Resident 1 was a different resident, and gave him the other resident's medications by mistake. LN 2 was not available for interview. Per the facility's Physician Order Report, dated 5/7/25, Resident 1 did not have any orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect (a type of abuse that involves failing to provide care and services to a resident) for one of one resident (Resident 1) within the 24-hour timeframe to the State Survey Agency (SA, where the state law provides for jurisdiction in long term care facilities) of the reported incident. This failure resulted in the delay of facility's abuse investigation and potentially expose Resident 1 and other residents for further neglect. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of multiple fractures (broken bones) of the pelvis (a bone that connects the upper body to the lower body) and dementia (a condition characterized by loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities) per facility's admission record. On 10/5/23 at 1:52 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADMIN). The ADMIN stated two certified nursing assistant students (SCNA 1 and SCNA 2) reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care plans were developed for six residents when: 1. Four residents had symptoms of vomiting and/or diarrhea (Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4 and Resident 5); 2. Two residents had fall incidents (Resident 1 and Resident 6); 3. A resident ' s bladder incontinence was not addressed (Resident 1) These failures could potentially affect these residents in the care areas that were not care planned. These included proper attention and assessment for dehydration and infection control for Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4 and Resident 5; avoiding further falls for Resident 6; preventing injury from further falls for Resident 1; and interventions to address bladder incontinence for Resident 1. Findings: 1. Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (too much sugar circulating in the blood) with diabetic kidney disease (a complication of diabetes causing damage to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VI LIVING — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $659K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA