The Canyons Post-Acute
1350 Reche Canyon Rd, Colton, CA 92324 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 160 certified beds · (909) 370-4411 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $66,158 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-12)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.9% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 15.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.30 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.51 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 20.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.7%CMS range 34.9–76.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 20.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 15.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 134.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.47 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one of three residents (Resident 1), when the Registered Nurses failed to perform a comprehensive nursing assessment (a detailed physical examination of the patient's entire body, to gather information about the patient's status) on Resident 1 upon his initial admission to the facility on July 3, 2024, and his readmission from the hospital on July 9, 2024,after Resident 1 was sent out due to being unresponsive. This failure resulted in Registered Nurse 6 (RN 6) being unaware of Resident 1's paracentesis drainage tube (a catheter to remove fluid from the abdominal cavity) and connecting the enteral feeding formula (liquid food designed to provide nutrition directly into the stomach) to the paracentesis drainage tube, instead of the gastrostomy tube feeding (G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdominal wall that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). The administration of the enteral feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were provided training to demonstrate competencies with paracentesis drainage tube (a catheter to remove fluid from the abdominal cavity) and gastrostomy tube feeding (G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdominal wall that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Registered Nurse 6 (RN 6) connected and infused the enteral feeding formula (liquid food designed to provide nutrition directly into the stomach) to the paracentesis drainage tube, instead of the gastrostomy tube feeding, on July 9, 2024. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to experience unnecessary abdominal pain, retained enteral feeding formula into the peritoneal cavity (space within the abdomen that is lined by the peritoneum, a thin, smooth membrane) and Resident 1 was transferred to a general acute care hospital (GACH) in the intensive care unit (ICU), where he died. Findings: During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their infection control program was followed when: 1. Three dialysis caregivers (Caregiver 1, 2 and 3) from [Name of dialysis center] accessed the Central Venous Catheter (CVC, a flexible thin tube that is inserted to the vein to the large artery of the heart used for hemodialysis, (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys no longer work, a life sustaining procedure) and practiced poor infection control for two of three (Residents 216, and 220) of 3 hemodialysis sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to promote development and spread of communicable diseases and infections to Resident 216 and Resident 220, who are vulnerable and immunocompromised (when one's immune system's defenses are low, affecting its ability to fight off infections and diseases) residents who are receiving hemodialysis. 2. One Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) entered a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for maintenance service when a sink faucet in room [ROOM NUMBER] was unattached to the sink and without accessible to hot water. This failure resulted in residents and staff to perform handwashing in room [ROOM NUMBER] and had the potential for increased risk of infection for patients and staff. Findings: During an observation on June 15, 2026, at 10:30 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] , the sink faucet was observed to not be fully secured to the sink. A further observation revealed the sink was without hot water. During an interview on June 15, 2026, at 10:33 AM, with Housekeeping Manager (HM), the HM stated, the sink faucet is not supposed to be unattached to the sink and there should be access to hot water. The HM further stated she was unaware of the issue in room [ROOM NUMBER] During an interview on June 15, 2026, at 10:54 AM, with Maintenance Director ([NAME]), [NAME] stated, the sink faucet should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff implemented appropriate interventions for one (1) of 29 sampled residents (Resident 17) when, nursing staff did not document the restraint (an item used to stop a patient from removing medical equipment or hurting themselves) repositioning every two hours or initiate a restraint care plan as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to result in resident care needs not being met, inappropriate use of restraints, and failure to identify complications associated with the use of restraints which could jeopardize the health and safety for for Resident 17 Findings:During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anoxic brain damage (Brain injury caused when the brain gets no oxygen for too long, killing brain cells),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- federal requirement ensuring that anyone with a serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or a related condition isn't placed in a nursing home without proper assessment and support) was completed for one (1) of 29 residents (Resident 14) when the facility did not complete a required PASRR level 1 screening (a quick check to spot potential mental illness or intellectual disability when someone is about to enter a nursing home) after Resident 14 remained in the facility for more than 30 days under exempted hospital discharge status (EHDS- allows an individual to enter a nursing facility without full PASRR, if a physician certifies before discharge that the resident is likely to need less than 30 days of skilled nursing care). This failure had the potential to delay the identification of mental health needs, the determination of whether a PASRR Level II evaluation (detailed follow-up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter care was provided and documented for one (1) of 29 sampled residents (Resident 8) with an indwelling urinary catheter (foley- a tube inserted into the bladder to continuously drain urine) when staff did not document routine cleansing of the foley catheter as required by the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential to increase the risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI- a urinary tract infection caused by or associated with urinary catheter), skin irritation, and other catheter-related complications for Resident 8.Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included kidney transplant (received a donated kidney to replace a failed kidney), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (loss of normal bladder control cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nutritional interventions and monitoring for 2 (two) of 29 sampled residents (Resident 17 and 104) when: 1. For Resident 17, the facility failed to communicate Registered Dietitian's recommendations to the physician after the Resident 17 experienced weight loss, including recommendations for weekly weights and modification of the tube feeding regimen, resulting in no updated medical orders. 2. For Resident 104, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained as ordered by the physician. These failures resulted in delayed identification and treatment of nutritional concerns, contributed to continued weight loss, inadequate nutritional intake, and decline in overall health status for Residents 17 and 104. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 29 sampled residents (Resident 29) received enteral feeding (method of delivering liquid nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract using a tube placed into the stomach or small intestine) as ordered by the the physician when the ordered daily total of 918 mL (milliliter-unit of measurement ) was not administered. This failure had the potential to result in malnutrition, weight loss, and electrolyte imbalance for Resident 29.Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a temporary or permanent brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance, illness, or organ failure elsewhere in the body, rather than a direct head injury), injury of left foot, and major depressive disorder (severe health condition where a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices for one (1) of 29 sampled residents (Resident 60) when a humidifier bottle (a device that adds moisture to the air) attached to a tracheostomy (trach- a small tube placed into a surgically created opening in the neck to help a person breathe) oxygen delivery system was observed resting on the floor while in use. This failure resulted in improper handling and positioning of respiratory equipment, which had the potential to introduce germs (tiny organism that can cause an infection) into the humidification system and directly into Resident 60 airway (the breathing passage that carries air from nose and mouth to your lungs), increasing the risk for infections for Resident 60.Findings: During a review of Resident 60's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately maintain its equipment when:#1. Three (3) of three exhaust fans (removes moisture and odors) in the shower rooms were not operational. This failure had the potential to pose a risk of mold (type of fungus that grows on damp organic matter, appearing as fuzzy, colorful patches and spreading via airborne spores) growth which may compromise the health and well-being of the 124 residents. #2. A faucet in one (1) of five (5) residents' (Resident 1) room was continuously leaking, which is creating a continuous noise disturbance. This failure resulted in disruption for Resident 1, particularly impacting on her ability to fall asleep during the night.Findings: #1. During a concurrent observation and interview, on May 7, 2026, at 2:50 PM, with the Maintenance Supervisor (Supervisor), shower rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were inspected. It was noted that the exhaust fans in the three shower rooms were not operational. The Supervisor acknowledged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper oral care (refers to the maintenance of a healthy mouth, which includes not only teeth, but the lips, gums, and supporting tissues) was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was found to have larvae (baby form of insects) inside his mouth.This failure could worsen Resident 1's oral health, particularly as he is being treated for periodontitis (bacterial infection that destroys the gums, ligaments, and bone supporting teeth caused by poor oral health and untreated gingivitis)Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic data) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting left non-dominant side following cerebral infarction (stroke), encephalopathy (a syndrome caused by changed in mental status such as confusion, memory loss,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), who was on contact precaution isolation (measures applied when caring for patients with infections known or suspected to spread via touch or contact with contaminated item), when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) failed to wear gloves while picking up the call light of Resident 1 from the floor.This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi or parasites) to Resident 1, other residents, and staff in the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot properly move oxygen into the blood or remove carbon dioxide), and Klebsiella Pneumoniae (a type of bacterium that can cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2), when Resident 1's call light was located on the floor, and Resident 2's call light was wrapped around the bed rail. In both instances, the call lights were out of reach of Resident 1 and Resident 2.These failures had the potential to delay Residents 1 and 2's ability to request assistance when needed, increasing the risk of unmet care needs, and possible injury.Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the lungs cannot properly move oxygen into the blood or remove carbon dioxide), and Klebsiella Pneumoniae (a type of bacterium that can cause severe, hard-to-treat infections if it spreads to lungs or blood).During a concurrent observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Bed-Holds (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization) and Returns policy and procedure was implemented for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's responsible party (Resident 1's daughter) was not provided any verbal or written information regarding Resident 1's right to exercise the bed hold provision (legal requirement, often lasting 7 days, that allows nursing home or skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents to reserve their specific bed while temporarily hospitalized ) when he was transferred to the general acute care hospital (GACH) on January 4, 2026.This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 1's representative not being able to exercise their right for the bed hold provision.Findings:A review of Resident's 1 admission Record (a document containing clinical and demographic information data) indicated Resident 1 was initially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that call light was within reach for two of four sample residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed, when Resident 1's call light was observed wrapped around the left bed rail with the cord hanging down towards the floor, while the bedside table was placed against the left bed rail, obstructing access to the call light. Resident 2's call light was observed clipped to the top portion of the bed with the cord oriented away from Resident 2, placing it out of Resident 2's reach.This failure had the potential to delay Resident 1 and 2's ability to request assistance when needed, increasing the risk of unmet care needs, and exacerbating the confusion of Resident 1 and 2, leading to possible Injury.During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 3B (moderate to severe kidney function…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory therapists were available for 41 residents when there was no respiratory therapist on duty for approximately seven (7) hours during the night shift of October 12, 2025.This failure had the potential to place clinically compromised residents' health and safety at risk by not having a respiratory therapist available to provide appropriate care when necessary.Findings:During an interview on 10/14/2025, at 3:00 PM, with one of the residents (Resident 1), Resident 1 stated, two nights ago, there was no RT (Respiratory Therapist) at all. The nurses do not know how to operate the machine; I just stayed off the machine. I was suctioned before the RT left.During an interview on 10/14/2025, at 3:50 PM, with Respiratory Therapist (RT 1), RT 1 stated, I came early Monday [10/13/2025] at 5:00 AM, I clocked in before 5:00 AM, there was no RT on duty. RT 1 indicated that the scheduled RT called off, and another RT, who lacks work permit, did not report to work. To address the situation, an RT from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate dialysis (the process of removing excess water and cleaning the blood) treatment was acquired for one of three residents (Resident 1) for 2 days.This failure resulted in a clinically compromised resident Resident 1 not receiving dialysis as ordered by the physician and was sent out to acute hospital for treatment and placing health and safety at risk. Findings:During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics information), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include End Stage Renal Disease (kidneys have severe damage) dependent on Renal Dialysis, acute respiratory failure (fluid prevents lungs filling with air), hypertension (high blood pressure).During a record review on October 23, 2025, at 11:30AM, Resident 1's medical records, reviewed and verified the following:1. History and Physical dated October 22, 2025: Patient is not able to make own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy in providing Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) when showers/bed bath were not provide as scheduled for 17 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12,13,14,15,16, and 17).This failure had the potential to result in skin irritation, odor, and decreased quality of life for the residents.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review of the Shower Schedule Station 2 with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2), on July 9, 2025, at 2:36 PM, CNA 2 stated they have residents who complained about not receiving showers on Saturdays. Review of the Shower Schedule Station 2 document indicated the following schedule for Wednesday's and Saturday's:a. Hallway 1, AM shift: 201B, 202B, 207B, 208B, 209A, 210Ab. Hallway 2, AM shift: 215A, 216A, 220B, 222A, 225Cc. Hallway 3, AM shift: 227B, 228B, 233A, 236Ad. Hallway 1, PM shift: 203A, 209B, 211C, 212Ae. Hallway 2, PM shift: 215B, 214A, 218Bf. Hallway 3, PM shift:228A, 230B, 236BDuring a review of the electronic medical record for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performed hand hygiene after doffing (removing) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) upon leaving the isolation (to keep patients with contagious diseases separate from others) room for two of 25 (Resident 18 and 19).This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi or parasites) to other residents and staff in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on July 08, 2025, at 1:54 PM, with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 3), CNA 3 was observed to enter the isolation room for Resident 18 wearing gloves and isolation gown. CNA 3 exited the room and doffed (removed) her (PPE). CNA 3 did not perform hand hygiene after doffing her PPE. CNA 3 stated she did not touch the resident or anything in the room, that is why she did not do hand hygiene.During a review of Resident 18's clinical record, the isolation list indicated Resident 18 was placed on contact precautions on July 08, 2025, due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform timely maintenance on the ventilators (a breathing machine or breathing device that helps a resident breath when they cannot do it on their own) for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents (Residents 1 & 2). This failure has the potential to cause malfunctions of the ventilators, which may place the health of clinically compromised Residents 1 and 2 at risk. Findings: During an observation on 5/22/2025, at 12:43 p.m. in the Subacute Unit, with the respiratory therapist (RT 1) and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), it was noted that the two ventilators currently in use for Resident 1 and Resident 2 were overdue for service maintenance. The maintenance sticker observed for both ventilators indicated the following: a. For Resident 1 - preventative maintenance was due on June 17, 2023. b. For Resident 2 - preventative maintenance was due on September 20, 2024. The ADON and RT 1 acknowledged that preventive maintenance for both ventilators is already past due. During a concurrent interview and review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its Activities of Daily Living ADLs policy and procedure for 3 of 3 sampled Residents (Resident ' s 1,2 and 3) when: Resident ' s 1, 2 and 3 were left soiled and wet on observation April 30, 2025. This failure had the potential to cause (Resident 1,2, and 3) health and safety to be at risk for skin breakdown when their care needs were not met. Findings: 1. During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: encephalopathy (brain disease altering function, causes: infection tumor or stroke), respiratory failure, tracheostomy status (trach tube assisting with breathing). Hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent observation and interview on April 30, 2025, at 11:30AM, with License Vocational Nurse (LVN1) at bedside assisting during observation. Resident 1 brief is completely drenching wet, linen sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed no more than 13 days after the admission date for 1 (Resident #333) of 27 sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings included: On 03/06/2025 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy that addressed MDS assessments, but the facility went by the RAI Manual. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.19.1, October 2024, revealed section 5.2 Timeliness Criteria, specified, - For the admission assessment, the MDS Completion Date (Z0500B) must be no later than 13 days after the Entry Date (A1600). An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #333 on 02/11/2025. Resident #333's admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/18/2025, revealed A1600.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the location to which a resident was discharged for 1 (Resident #128) of 27 sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings included: On 03/06/2025 at 12:50 PM, the Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy that addressed MDS assessments, but the facility went by the RAI Manual. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.19.1, October 2024, revealed section A2105: Discharge Status specified, Code 09, Hospice (home/non-institutional): if the resident was discharged to a community-based program for terminally ill persons. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #128 on 11/19/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #104) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications was monitored for the presence of adverse drug reactions or other side effects related to the use of a prescribed antipsychotic medication. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised in 01/2020, indicated, 9. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report adverse consequences of antipsychotic medications to the Attending Physician. Resident #104's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 09/22/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of depression. Resident #104's Order Summary Report contained an order dated 12/26/2024 for Zyprexa Zydis (olanzapine orally disintegrating tablets, an atypical antipsychotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg), one-half tablet by mouth one time a day for hyperactive delirium, end of life. The Order Summary Report did not include orders to monitor for adverse drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff cleaned and disinfected supplies between resident uses for 2 (Resident #72 and Resident #38) of 7 residents observed during medication administration observations. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, revised 10/2018, revealed, 1. The following categories are used to distinguish the levels of sterilization/disinfection necessary for items used in resident care, including, c. Non-critical items are those that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes. (1) Non-critical resident-care items include bedpans, blood pressure cuffs, crutches, and computers. (2) Most non-critical reusable items can be decontaminated where they are used (as opposed to being transported to a central processing location). d. Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], stethoscopes, durable medication equipment). The policy specified, 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its Activities of Daily Living ADLs policy and procedure for 3 of 4 sampled Residents (Resident's 1,2 and 3) when: 1. Resident 1 used call light to get staff attention for help, waiting over an hour. 2. Resident 2 used call light to get assistance, then is turned off by staff failing to return or returning after an hour wait. 3. Resident 3 used call light along with roommates to help get assistance, staff states I'm not the assigned staff will look for assigned staff, this prolonged already long wait times. This failure had the potential to cause (Resident 1,2, and 3) health and safety to be at risk for skin break down when their care needs were not met. Findings: During interview and Records Reviewed with (Resident 1,2, and 3) indicates as followed: 1. During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment, when the shower room used by two of three sample residents (Resident 1 and 2) had uneven flooring, fractured tiles, and permanent residue on the wall. This failure had the potential to affect the health and wellness of Resident 1 and 2. Findings: During a telephone interview on October 21, 2024, at 8:45 AM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated shower room was dirty there was gloves on the floor, shower stall wasn ' t working there was no hot water at that time, the floor has mold that need to be scrubbed more. During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical records, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Osteomyelitis (bone infection), type 2 diabetes (Type 2 DM – a chronic disease that occurs when the body doesn ' t produce enough insulin or doesn ' t used insulin properly resulting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to its safety and supervision of resident ' s policy when one of the four sampled residents (Resident 1) was left unattended during patient care. This failure had the potential to put a clinically compromised resident (Resident 1) at risk for serious injury, resulting in Resident 1 falling and requiring transfer to an acute general hospital for evaluation and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included persistent vegetative state (someone with brain damage appears to be awake but does not respond to their surroundings or perform purposeful actions). During an interview on 9/24/2024 at 2:07 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN)1, LVN 1 stated the certified nursing assistant (CNA) was in the process of changing Resident 1. The CNA went to gather supplies, and upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide care and services for residents and ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner for all three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of three clinically compromised Residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when their requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly. Findings: During an interview on October 11, 2024, at 9:30 AM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 in bed, is alert and oriented. Resident 1 stated it took a while for the staff to answer the call light, at night it takes more than 20 minutes. During review of Resident 1 ' s admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), was provided proper wound care treatments and assessment. This failure placed a clinically compromised Resident (Resident 1) health and safety at risk. When skin integrity was not being treated and assessed by nursing staff that resulted in infection and hospital stay. Findings: During review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: acute kidney failure (kidneys lose ability to remove waste), heart failure (heart doesn't pump blood as well), osteomyelitis to left ankle and foot (inflammation of bone caused by infection), diabetes type II (body does not produce enough insulin, or resist insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1's Medical Record with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) reviewed and verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide care and services for residents and ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for two out of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1 & Resident 2) when their requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly. Findings: During the review of Resident 1's admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included unspecified hyperlipidemia (increase levels of lipids - like cholesterol [waxy substance found in the blood] with high cholesterol increases the chance of heart problem). During an interview and observation with Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure for prevention of pressure ulcers/injuries when one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was not repositioned in a timely manner. This failure resulted in the development of pressure ulcer of clinically compromised resident (Resident 1). Findings: During the review of Resident 1's admission record (It contains important information about the patient such as their personal details, the reason for their admission, and their medical history), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included unspecified hyperlipidemia (increase levels of lipids - like cholesterol [waxy substance found in the blood] with high cholesterol increases the chance of heart problem). During an interview and observation with Resident 1 on July 3, 2024, at 11:20 AM, the resident stated that staff responses to call lights are typically delayed, taking an hour or two during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow Its policy and procedure to provide Activities of Daily Living Services (ADLS) and ensure call lights are answered in timely manner for two of three sampled residents. (Resident's 2 and 3). This failure had the potential to place clinically compromised Residents (Resident 2 and 3) health and safety at risk. When residents were left soiled, and their hygiene needs were not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's (R2) admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include: cardiac arrest (loss of heart function), chronic respiratory failure (lungs cannot get enough oxygen, dependent on ventilator, machine to provided oxygen), type2 diabetes (body doesn't produce enough insulin, or resist insulin), anoxic brain damage (complete lack of oxygen to the brain). During a concurrent observation and interview on March 28, 2024, with Resident 2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide activities of daily living services (ADLS) and ensure two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) received care with changing when needed. This failure had the potential to place two clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1 and 2) health and safety at risk. When residents were left soiled, and their hygiene needs were not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which include acute cholecystitis (a condition with redness and swelling of the small organ under the liver), lack of coordination (a condition which causes jerky movements), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), osteoarthritis right knee (a condition in which the joint break down overtime) and, hypertension (high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their abuse policy and procedure was implemented, when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) and a Registered Nurse (RN) did not report an allegation of rape to the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) immediately, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), on December 24, 2023. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet (contains demographic data), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, chronic respiratory failure (shortness of breath), encounter for attention to tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening from outside the neck), quadriplegia (paralysis that affects limbs and body from the neck down), major depressive disorder (a serious medical illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an injury of unknown origin was promptly reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) in accordance with the facility's policy, for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for an injury of unknown origin to go uninvestigated and unreported thereby increasing the chances of harm to Resident 1. Finding: An abbreviated survey was conducted on November 22, 2023, at 2:50 PM to investigate a complaint related to accidents. A review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included: Encephalopathy (disturbance in the way the brain functions), Alzheimer's disease (gradual decline in memory, thinking, behavior and social skills) and muscle weakness. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the admission Assessment titled, Wandering Risk Scale dated November 12, 2023, indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an elopement (unsupervised wandering that leads to the resident leaving the facility) by Resident 1 when he left the facility unnoticed and was found unsupervised in the parking lot. This failure resulted in a mentally compromised resident (Resident 1) sustaining a fall with injuries and placed this residents' safety at risk. Findings: An abbreviated survey was conducted on November 22, 2023, at 2:50 PM to investigate a complaint related to accidents. A review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included: Encephalopathy (disturbance in the way the brain functions), Alzheimer's disease (gradual decline in memory, thinking, behavior and social skills) and muscle weakness. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the admission Assessment titled, Wandering Risk Scale dated November 12, 2023, indicated Resident 1 was a high risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a comprehensive care plan for one of three Residents (Resident 1). This failure contributed to the decline and development of Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcers. Findings: An abbreviated survey was conducted on August 2, 2023, at 2:20 PM to investigate a complaint regarding Quality of Care. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Dysphagia and central cord syndrome of cervical spine cord sequela (injury to the spinal cord causing weakness in the arms and legs.) During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the change in condition note, dated May 9, 2023, indicated wound to the sacrum, deep tissue injury, 3 cm (centimeters, unit of measure) by 3 cm with scant amount of drainage noted. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the Care Plans, undated indicated, Resident 1 did have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a one of three residents (Resident 1) did not develop a pressure ulcer when staff did not reposition and turn Resident 1 frequently or every two hours as per their policy. This failure contributed to the development of a pressure ulcer to Resident 1 ' s sacrum (bone located on the bottom of the spine). Findings: An abbreviated survey was conducted on August 2, 2023, at 2:20 PM to investigate a complaint regarding Quality of Care. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Dysphagia and central cord syndrome of cervical spine cord sequela (injury to the spinal cord causing weakness in the arms and legs.) During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with redness to the cervical neck incision, redness to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow policy and procedure to ensure call lights were answered in timely manner to provide care and services for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1,2, 3). This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1,2, 3) health and safety at risk. When residents were left soiled, and their activities of daily living were not met in timely manner. Findings: During review of Residents 1's (R1) admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness/paralysis on one side of body), myasthenia Gravis ( a condition causing abnormal weakness of certain muscles), Chronic Respiratory Failure ( difficult to breath ), tracheostomy dependence ( people who have breathing problems with tracheostomy and may also need breathing support from a mechanical ventilator ). During interview with R1 on July 25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen environment when: 1. The walk-in freezer that provided storage of food for 83 out of 120 residents, had a red colored dry spillage and crumbs under where the meat and chicken trays were stored. This had the potential for microorganism (small organisms which have the potential to cause disease) growth and to attract pests. 2. The floor under the oven and stove had food crumbs, trash and grime, and there were streaks of residue and grime on the sides of the oven and stove. This had the potential to promote bacterial growth within this area as well as attract microorganisms. The facility failures to ensure a safe and sanitary food preparation could result in the increased risk of resident harm related to disease-causing microorganisms contaminating the residents' food which could cause food-borne illness to a population of immunocompromised (residents who can easily get sick due to their inability to fight infection) residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when one of three sampled residents (Resident 420) pressed the call light for help because she felt like she could not breathe, and waited 20 minutes for assistance, despite multiple staff members passing her room as the resident loudly pleaded for help. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 420's needs go unmet, resulting in fear, anxiety, and frustration. Findings: During an observation on April 6, 2023, at 5:42 AM, the call light was on outside of Resident 420's room. Resident 420 was heard saying she could not breathe. A staff member walked past the resident's room and did not acknowledge the call light was on or the resident stating she could not breathe. Another staff, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) also walked past the resident's room without acknowledging the call light as the resident repeatedly stated she could not breathe. During an observation on April 6,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents could exercise their rights within the facility when one of three sampled residetns (Resident 83) requested for her foley catheter (a flexible tube used to drain urine) to be discontinued but was not carried out as ordered by the attending physician. This failure had the potential for a negative psychosocial outcome for one of three sampled residents (Resident 83) related to her right to make decisions about her care and treatment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on April 4, 2023, at 9:47 AM, Resident 83 was observed with an in-dwelling foley catheter. Resident 83 stated she told her doctor that she wanted her foley catheter be discontinued. She further stated, she did not have a foley catheter when she was at home. During record review of Resident 73's face sheet (a document containing basic information, demographics, and diagnoses), indicated Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document resident's current health status for the use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner) during Minimum Data Set (MDS, (a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status), assessment. This failure had the potential for care and services to remain unmet for one (Resident 10) of six sampled residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on April 4, 2023, at 11:09 AM, Resident 10 was observed with skin discoloration on her right knee due to a fall that occurred at her home. Resident 10 also stated she currently takes Pradaxa as anticoagulant (a substance that is used to prevent and treat blood clots in blood vessels and the heart, also called blood thinner.) A review of Resident 10's face sheet (a document containing resident's basic information and diagnoses) indicated Resident 10 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oversight and ensure that only Dialysis (a life sustaining procedure of removing excess water and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally) Registered Nurses were allowed to access residents' central venous catheters (CVC), (CVC- a plastic flexible tube that's located in the neck, upper chest, or groin. The CVC is connected to the bloodlines during dialysis, allowing for the transfer of blood to and from the body to the dialysis machine and back) during the provision of resident's dialysis care, according to professional standards of practices when: 1) Dialysis Caregiver 1 (DC 1) accessed (to initiate use) Resident 216's CVC 2) Dialysis Caregiver 2 (DC 2) accessed Resident 220's CVC 3) Dialysis Caregiver 3 (DC 3) accessed Resident 6's CVC These failures had the potential for resident harm and/or death, the risk of the residents acquiring blood borne infections (infection caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely prepared for six out of six residents (Resident 418, 115, 416, 417, 420, and 69) when one Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN 1) prepared medications for the six residents at the same time and more than three hours in advance of when the medications were ordered for administration. This failure had the potential for these vulnerable residents to receive the wrong medications, which could lead to adverse health outcomes and/or death. Findings: During an observation and interview on April 6, 2023, at 5:44 AM, with LVN 1, outside of Resident 417's room, six clear medication cups were lined up at the back of LVN 1's medication cart (used to transport resident medications). The medication cups were labeled with resident room numbers and in the medication cups were various pills, an alcohol wipe, a lancet (sharp needle used to obtain blood for testing glucose), and test strips (small piece of plastic used to measure blood sugar) for the glucometer (medical device used to monitor glucose in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were secured, when one (med cart 1) of four medication carts (used to transport resident medications) were found unlocked and unattended by a licensed nurse, with the keys to unlock the narcotics (prescription pain medications) drawer placed on top of the medication cart. This failure had the potential to compromise the security of the medications and potentially allow unauthorized staff and residents to access these medications. Findings: During an observation on April 6, 2023, at 5:30 AM, a medication cart 1 was unlocked and unattended. On top of the medication cart 1 was a yellow coil wristband with a key ring and three keys attached to it, and one key was labeled NARC. During a concurrent observation and interview on April 6, 2023, at 5:35 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), LVN 2 opened a drawer in the medication cart without using a key to unlock it. The medication drawer stored bubble packs (medications dispensed in sealed compartments) of resident medications. LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$66,158 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $66,158 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-10 for 27 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ARK POST ACUTE NETWORK — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 3 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEST COAST COMMONWEALTH LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2011 |
| VINSON, ALISHA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| BRIDGES, ROY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| JUSTINIANO, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/01/2020 |
| ARK POST ACUTE NETWORK LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2021 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555435. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.