No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Desert Springs Healthcare & Wellness Centre

82262 Valencia Avenue, Indio, CA 92201 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 68 certified beds · (760) 347-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 347-6000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)3 actual-harm citations$66,151 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $66,151 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-13)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
82420 Miles Ave · (760) 342-3336 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
82422 Miles Ave · (760) 347-3429 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
82266 CA-111 · (760) 342-0214 · Call to confirm hours
Park
44700 Palm St · (760) 347-3429 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
44550 Monroe St · (760) 347-0604

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.7%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.0%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.542.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.781.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
87.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.30hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 87.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.1%CMS range 40.6–59.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.7–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge87.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.0–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.521.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.28
RN hours/ resident / day
1.25
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 60.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-18)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-09-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident A), the facility failed to ensure effective pain management was provided when the pain medications were not administered as ordered by the physician after spine surgery. This failure resulted in Resident A to experience severe pain which affected her quality of life and psychosocial well-being. Resident A was eventually transferred to acute hospital for pain management. Findings: On August 16, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint of quality of care. On August 16, 2024, at 9:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after 3 p.m. The DON stated Resident A had a spinal compression surgery (a procedure that treats compressed nerves in the spine), and was taking pain medications. The DON stated Resident A started asking for her pain medications by 5 p.m. on the day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident A), was free from physical abuse when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) grabbed both Resident A's arms and hands and continued with care while the resident was being combative during provision of care. This failure resulted in Resident A to have discolorations on both arms, hands, left side of the cheek, and neck area. In addition, Resident A was not able to tell the CNA to stop as she was afraid and felt threatened by CNA 1. Findings: On August 7, 2023, at 9:40 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On August 7, 2023, at 9:46 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 noted Resident A with some discolorations on her upper extremities and left side of the face on July 23, 2023, at around 9 a.m. The DON stated LVN 1 indicated the discolorations were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two person-assist during incontinent care (cleaning the resident while in bed after periods of urination or bowel elimination) in accordance with the plan of care, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's fall from the bed and was sent out to the acute care hospital for further management. Resident 1 sustained a fracture (broken bone) to the right arm and required to have surgical repair of the fracture. Findings: On April 10, 2023, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a facility reported incident. On April 10, 2023, at 9:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated Resident 1 fell from the bed on March 26, 2023, at 3:46 a.m. She stated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was providing incontinent care to Resident 1 and CNA 1 turned the resident away from her towards Resident 1's left side and Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound care and management were implemented according to the facility's policy and procedure and national guidelines, for two of three residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 2), when:1.For Resident 1, the pressure injury (PI - a localized damage to the skin and underlying tissue caused by constant pressure, usually over a bony prominence) on the sacrococcyx (tail bone) area was not properly assessed. In addition, the treatment for Resident 2's PI on bilateral buttocks was not appropriate according to the facility's treatment protocol; and2.For Resident 2, infection control measures were not implemented while providing wound care. These failures had the potential for delayed wound healing and placed the resident at risk for further complications such as infection and worsening of the wound.Findings:On April 13,2026, at 9;15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a quality-of-care issue.1.On April 13,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated medications and biologicals were stored at temperatures in accordance with facility policy and manufacturer's specifications, when one of two medication refrigerators was identified with documented temperature readings below the normal range on multiple days in September 2025. This failure had the potential for residents to receive ineffective medications which could result in the residents not receiving the full benefit of the medications, leading to further health complications.Findings:On September 15, 2025, at 11:28 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview at nursing station 1 with Registered Nurse (RN), a medication refrigerator was inspected. The refrigerator temperature was observed on the thermometer to be 28 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a temperature measurement) and contained the following medications:- Afluria (influenza vaccine) injectable suspension;- Tuberculin PPD (test agent used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis [a respiratory disease]) vial; and- various types of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean linens (pillows) were handled and stored in a manner that prevented the spread of infection, when clean pillows were observed improperly stored in an area designated for soiled materials.This deficiency had the potential to cause harm by placing residents at risk for contamination from microorganisms.FindingsOn September 18, 2025, at 12:25 p.m., during a tour of the laundry area, multiple clean pillows wrapped in a clear plastic bag, were found stacked in the soiled area of the laundry. The plastic bag of clean pillows were observed tied in one knot but with open areas to escape in and out of the bag.On September 18, 2025, at 12:27 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Laundry Director (LD). The LD stated they did not have room to store the clean pillows. The LD acknowledged that keeping pillows in the soiled area of the laundry room could pose an infection control issue. On September 18, 2025, at 12:29 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Plant Manager (PM). The PM stated the pillows…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure, for one out of one resident reviewed in the care planning process (Resident 7), was involved in the care planning process when Resident 7 was not notified of the gradual dose reduction (GDR - stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose of if the dose or medication can be discontinued) for the medication Depakote (medication used to treat bipolar disorder [ mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings]).This failure resulted in Resident 7 feeling suppressed when changes were made to her plan of care without her knowledge, involvement, or consent. As a result, this violated Resident 7's right to be involved in her care and provide informed consent. Findings:On September 16, 2025, at 11:25 a.m., Resident 7 was interviewed. Resident 7 that her Depakote dosage was reduced from twice a day to once a day two weeks ago. Resident 7 stated she feels different and more suppressed since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a copy of the Advance Directive (AD - written instruction for the provision of care and services when unable to make decisions for oneself) was readily available in the chart, for one of 13 residents reviewed for Advance Directives (Resident 4). This failure had the potential for Resident 4's wishes for health care services not to be honored.Findings: On September 17, 2025, Resident 4's record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included rhabdomyolysis (a serious medical condition that occurs when muscle tissue breaks down, releasing harmful substances into the bloodstream).A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a clinical assessment tool), dated July 2, 2025, indicated Resident 4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 (mild cognitive impairment).A review of Resident 4's Social Services Assessment, dated June 26, 2025, indicated Resident 4 had an AD but was not on file, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for two of five residents (Resident 5 and 10) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when:1. Resident 10 was administered Aripiprazole (medication to treat mental illness) without potential adverse effect monitoring documented during use of risperidone; and2. Resident 5 was given quetiapine (medication to treat mental illness) without following the manufacturer's monitoring guidelines.These failures could have led to unnecessary medications for Residents 5 and 10, increasing the risk of medication interactions, adverse reactions, and side effects such as dyslipidemia (an abnormal balance of lipids or fats in the bloodstream), sedation, respiratory depression, constipation, anxiety, agitation, and memory loss.Findings:1. On September 17, 2025, Resident 10's record was reviewed. A review of Resident 10's admission Record, indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a clinical assessment tool) was accurately coded, for one of three residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 41).This failure resulted in an inaccurate MDS assessment to be submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).Findings: On September 18, 2025, Resident 41's record was reviewed. Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included senile degeneration of the brain (progressive decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life), Alzheimer's dementia (memory loss), and palliative care (comfort care).A review of Resident 41's Weights and Vitals Summary, indicated the following weights:-155 lbs. (pounds - unit of measurement); June 2, 2025; and-139 lbs.; July 2, 2025; weight loss of 12.58% in a month (significant weight loss is 5% or more).A review of Resident 41's MDS, dated [DATE], Section K for nutrition assessment, indicated no weight loss in the last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR), for two of five sampled residents (Resident 5 and 10) when: 1. Resident 10 was administered aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication for mental illness) without potential adverse effect monitoring documented during use of aripiprazole; and 2. Resident 5 was given quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication for mental illness, depression, and schizophrenia) without following the manufacturer's monitoring guidelines. These failures had the potential for medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome, and increased risk for adverse effects for Resident 5 and 10.Findings:1. On September 17, 2025, Resident 10's record was reviewed. A review of Resident 10's admission Record, indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizoaffective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the personal funds of a deceased resident was provided to the resident's legal representative with the required timeframe, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). In addition, the facility failed to provide the final financial statement and invoices of the breakdown of personal funds after multiple requests from Resident 1's legal representative.This deficient practice had the potential for loss and misuse of Resident 1's personal funds.Findings:On [DATE], at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a complaint. On [DATE], Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], and expired on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss). Resident 1's legal representative was her family member (FM)A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was severely impaired in cognition. On [DATE], at 11 a.m., during an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an alternative option was offered when a bed bath was refused, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive proper hygiene, feel unclean, and may result to skin irritation and/or skin breakdown. Finding: On April 17, 2025, at 8:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint on quality of care. On April 17, 2025, at 9:10 a.m., an observation with a concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was in his room, alert and conversant. Resident 1 stated he gets a shower every Monday and Thursday and due to a recent plumbing issue in the shower room, regular showers were not provided to the residents as scheduled. Resident 1 stated he was offered a bed bath as an alternative to a complete shower. Resident 1 stated he tried the bed bath at first and then he refused the second time it was offered. Resident 1 further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate orthostatic (standing upright) blood pressure (BP - measurement of the force of blood pushing against the blood walls) monitoring were conducted, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 6). This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to experience complications related to orthostatic blood pressure. Findings: On March 6, 2025, at 8:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a quality care issue. On March 6, 2025, Resident 6's record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer ' s disease (memory loss) and osteoporosis (bone disease). A review of Resident 6 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a tool for assessment), dated January 18, 2025, indicated Resident 6 had a moderately impaired and poor decisions regarding tasks of daily life. A review of Resident 6 ' s care plan goal, dated February 3, 2025, indicated Resident 6 will be free of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the interventions for revisions to address multiple incidents of falls for two of three sampled residents (Residents 7 and 8). This failure had the potential to result in unmet needs and a potential for falls with possible injury. Findings: On December 26, 2024, at 9:13 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate nursing services and accidents issue. A review of Resident 7's admission record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 7 was admitted with diagnoses which included cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of left lower limb, hypertension (force of blood against the artery walls is too high), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder of worry, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), difficultly walking and dementia (a group of conditions with impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgement). A review of Resident 7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' mail or packages were not opened without prior consent from the resident, for two of five residents sampled (Residents B and C). This failure resulted in Resident B and C's rights not being respected. Findings: On August 16, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., an announced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint of quality of care. On August 16, 2024, Resident B's medical record was reviewed. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure and prostate (a male reproductive gland) cancer. A review of Resident B's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated April 24, 2024, indicated Resident B had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 13 (cognitively intact). On August 20, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., during an interview with Resident B, Resident B stated he did not like when the staff opened his packages, he thought it was a violation of his rights, and he did not give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of a resident, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident A), when medications (pain medications and Nictoine patch [medication for smoking cessation]) were not acquired by the facility timely. This failure resulted in a delay in the care and treatment of Resident A's overall health condition. In addition, this failure had the potential for other residents to have a delay in the care and treatment. Findings: On Augsut 16, 2024, at 8:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an allegation of quality of care. On August 16, 2024, at 9:15 a.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after 3 p.m., after a spine surgery. The DON stated Resident A was prescribed pain medications such as Fentanly (narcotic pain medication), Methadone (narcotic pain medication), and Percocet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of five residents sampled (Resident A) had equipment to use was being maintained in a safe and operable condition when the left brakes of the wheelchair was not working. This failure had the potential to cause injury to Resident A when she was using a wheelchair. Findings: On August 16, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., an announced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint of quality of care. On August 16, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident A. Resident A was lying in bed on her right side facing the wall. Resident A stated she was not doing okay and wants out of the facility. Resident A stated when she wants to get up and go to the bathroom, she presses her call light, but the staff do not show up, and she had to try to take herself to the bathroom. Resident A stated the wheelchair was broken, and it was difficult for her to transfer herself to the wheelchair to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient licensed nurses with the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary to care for one (Resident A) of six sampled residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. This failure has the potential to affect the provision of care for Resident A and other residents at the facility. Findings: On September 11, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., an announced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint for quality of care. On September 16, 2024, at 11 a.m., Resident A ' s admission Record was reviewed. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke-loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cells in the brain are disturbed, causing seizures), and aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak). A review of Resident A ' s Order Summary Report indicated: - July 15, 2024, Observe for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident A) of six sampled residents was consistently assessed and was provided treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice, when Resident A had a fall and her vital signs became abnormal after the fall incident. These failures increased the risk for the current health condition of the resident to worsen due to delayed assessment and delayed provision of appropriate care. Findings: On September 11, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., an announced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint for quality of care. On September 16, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., Resident A ' s admission Record was reviewed. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (stroke-loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cells in the brain are disturbed, causing seizures), and aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was provided, for one of three resients reviewed (Resident 1), when the otuside patio had an open sunken area of dirt, approximately 2 inches below the level of surrounding concrete pavement. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being stuck in the dirt between a tree and the edge of the concrete pavement. Findings: On August 7, 2024, at 1:37 p.m. an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate two complaints. A request for facility policies and procedures, including those regarding Accidents and/or Accident Prevention was made. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated per her consultant, the facility did not have any, unless it pertained to a specific incident or condition that involved an accident. Resident 1' s record was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included right femur fracture, history of falling, high blood pressure, and muscle wasting and atrophy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure information regarding formulating an Advance Directives (AD- a written document that indicates a resident's medical wishes,) was provided to the resident or resident representative (RR), for three of six residents reviewed for AD, (Residents 6, 29, and 52). This failure had the potential for the resident/resident representative's current wishes for medical care not to be honored. Findings: 1. On July 15, 2024, Resident 29's record was reviewed. Resident 29 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal failure (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids), cognitive communications deficit (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions), and dementia (condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking). A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan (specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) was initiated for the use of apixaban (brand name Eliquis, an anti-coagulant, or blood thinning medication), for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to result in the delay in the care and treatment for Resident 6. Findings: On July 17, 2024, Resident 6's record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). A review of the Resident 6's telephone order, dated June 25, 2024, indicated, .Apixaban Oral Tablet 2.5 mg (mg - milligram, a unit of measurement) Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth two times a day for atrial fibrillation. In further review of Resident 6's record, there was no documented evidence a care plan was developed to address Resident 6's risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during monthly medication regimen review (MRR), four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 9, 6, 40, and 52), when: and three residents (Resident 6, 40, 52) on anticoagulation (medications also referred to as blood thinners) did not have monitoring for signs of bleeding: 1. Resident 9 was administered aripiprazole (an anti-psychotic medication for schizophrenia and bipolar depression) without adequate behavioral monitoring documented during use of aripiprazole; and 2. Residents 6, 40, and 52 were not monitored for signs and symptoms of adverse effects related to the use of anti-coagulants (blood thinners). These failures had the potential for medications not being optimized for the best possible health outcome, and unnecessary or prolonged use of medications which could lead to medication adverse effects for the residents. Findings 1. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Residents 6, 40 and 52) were free from unnecessary medications when: 1. Resident 6 received apixaban (brand name Eliquis, an anti-coagulant, or blood thinning medication) without monitoring for signs and symptoms of adverse effects related to the use of apixaban; 2. Resident 40 received apixaban without monitoring for signs and symptoms of adverse effects related to the use of apixaban; and 3. Resident 52 received enoxaparin (brand name Lovenox, an anti-coagulant, or blood thinning medication) without monitoring for signs and symptoms of adverse effects related to the use of enoxaparin. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medications for Residents 6, 40 and 52 and had the potential for side effects of this medication (such as bleeding, excessive bruising, etc.) to go undetected or recognized for timely intervention. Findings 1. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu during tray line (food preparation and assembly at the steam table) observation on July 17, 2024, for three of 68 residents who consumed food in the facility (Residents 9, 45 and 35). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' nutritional status and further compromise the residents' medical status. Findings: On July 17, 2024, at 9:15 a.m., the facility's Summer Menu for Week 3, Wednesday, was reviewed. The document indicated the lunch menu for the day included: - Taco Casserole - Seasoned Fresh Zucchini - Fiesta Salad; and - Tangy Glazed Fresh Fruit. On July 17, 2024, beginning at 11:35 a.m., a tray line observation was conducted. The following were observed: a. Resident 9's tray was assembled first due to a dialysis (removal of waste products and excess body fluids from the body via the blood due to kidney failure) appointment after lunch. Resident 9's diet, as written on the Order Listing Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control practices were properly implemented when: 1. The direct care staff were not aware which patients were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- a type of infection prevention measure requiring the use of gowns and gloves during high contact resident care); 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 observed EBP while feeding Resident 40. Resident 40 was not on the list for EBP; 3. Cohorting (placing residents in the same room) guidelines for EBP were not observed for Residents 6 and 117. These failures had the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings: 1. On July 16, 2024, at 10:22 a.m., signs for EBP were observed posted on the door of room [ROOM NUMBER], where Residents 117 and 6 were roomed. On July 16, 2024, at 10:32 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was interviewed and stated the EBP was for Resident 117 when she had her IV (intravenous- access through the vein for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat two of four sampled residents, with dignity and respect when the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) did not sit at eye level while feeding the residents (Residents 40 and 43). This failure did not promote resident's dignity, did not allow social interaction, and had the potential promote more serious negative outcomes. Findings: On July 15, 2024, at 12:16 p.m., CNA 1 was observed wearing gloves, gown, and mask, and feeding Resident 40 while standing up. In a concurrent interview, CNA 1 stated he should be sitting down while feeding Resident 40. On July 15, 2024, at 12:23 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated the CNA should been sitting down while feeding the resident. On July 15, 2024, at 12:34 p.m., the Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) was observed wearing a gown and gloves, and feeding Resident 43 while standing up. In a concurrent interview, the RNA stated she should be sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure were provided the necessary level of assistance to meet their activities of daily living needs, for two of two sampled residents (Residents 30 and 29), when: 1. Resident 30 was observed with lunch meal tray set up incomplete, with plastic covering/seal on food items and the milk carton was left unopened. Resident 30 was unable to remove the plastic covering nor able to open the milk carton; and 2. Resident 29 was observed with lunch meal tray set up incomplete, with plastic covering/seal on plated food items. Resident 29 was unable to remove the plastic covering on the plated food or reach her drinking cup. These failures resulted in the residents not receiving direct necessary care and services needed at mealtime and had the potential to compromise the health and wellbeing of the residents. Findings: 1. On July 15, 2024, at 12:14 p.m., Resident 30 was observed with lunch meal tray set up incomplete, with plastic covering/seal on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the abnormal results of the chest x-ray (radiology procedure of the chest) was addressed by the physician timely, for one of three closed record reviewed (Resident 22). In addition, the physician's order for antibiotic to treat the abnormal chest x-ray was not administered timely. These failures resulted in a delay in the care and treatment for Resident 22. Findings: On July 17, 2024, Resident 22's record was reviewed. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included aftercare for right femur (hip) fracture (broken bone) and malnutrition. A review of Resident 22's Progress Notes, indicated the following: - May 10,2024, at 3:34 p.m., indicated, .reported to (name of physician) pt (patient) VS (vital signs) 132/70 (blood pressure) 99.8 (temperature) .102HR (heart rate) 40resp (respiratory rate) a minute .refusing to open her eyes and moans to painful stimuli .waiting for advice .; - May 10, 2024, at 4:38 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent falls were implemented, for one of two residents (Resident 40) when 1:1 sitter was not provided to address impulsive behavior and falls. This failure had a potential to result in Resident 40 to have falls and sustain injury. Findings: On July 15, 2024, at 11:42 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 40. Resident 40 was observed lying in bed awake. Two bumps were observed on Resident 40's forehead. The right side of her forehead had a nickel-size bump with a dark scab and the left side had a quarter size bump with red bruising. The Resident 40 stated she fell a couple of days ago and could not remember how. Resident 40 stated staff helped her to eat as she was blind. On July 15, 2024, at 3:42 p.m., observed Resident 40 in her room alone, sitting at the edge of her wheelchair trying to get up, Resident 40 almost slipped out of the chair. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) for one of four residents (Resident 62) when a random controlled medication audit did not reconcile. The controlled medication was signed out of the Individual Narcotic Record (a controlled drug record, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Records (MAR) to indicate it was administered to Resident 62. This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled medications, which had the potential for misuse or diversion. Findings: The Individual Narcotic Record for controlled medications for four random residents receiving controlled medications were requested for review during the survey and indicated the following: A review of Resident 62's facility medical record indicated Resident 62 had a physician's order, dated June 19, 2024, for .Norco (hydrocodone-acetaminophen, a potent controlled medication for pain) 5/325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 9), when Resident 9 was administered aripiprazole (brand name Abilify, an anti-psychotic medication for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) without adequate behavioral monitoring documented during use of aripiprazole. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medications for Resident 9, which increased the potential for medication interactions, adverse reactions, and unidentified risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications that included but not limited to sedation, respiratory depression, constipation, anxiety, agitation, and memory loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated, Resident 9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotics were prescribed and administered to the residents under the guidance of their antibiotic stewardship program, for one of three residents reviewed for closed record (Resident 22), when: - Resident 22's condition did not meet the McGeer's criteria (a set of specific definitions to identify true infections in long term nursing facilities) for the use of antibiotic for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection); and - The physician's order to discontinue Macrobid (a medication to treat UTI) was not carried out as ordered. These failures had the potential for antibiotics to be used when it was not indicated and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Findings: On July 17, 2024, Resident 22's record was reviewed. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included aftercare for right femur (hip) fracture (broken bone) and malnutrition. A review of Resident 22's Progress Notes, indicated the following: - May…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate administration of treatments, as ordered by the physician for Residents 1 & 2. This failure had the potential to delay Resident 1 & 2 ' s wound healing. Findings: On November 20, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., and unannounce visit was made to the facility to investigate a Quality-of-Care issue. 1) Review of Resident 1 ' s admission records, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and fatty tissue, cutaneous abcess (collection of puss in the skin) of the abdominal wall. Further review indicated Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 (Moderate cognitive impairment). Review of Resident 1 ' s Physician ' s (Dr ' s) orders, indicated the following: A) October 24, 2023, . Cleanse abdominal wound with normal saline, pat dry apply Cacium alginate with silver to wound bed, apply zinc oxide ointment to peri wound cover . secure .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from verbal abuse, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was heard threatening Resident 1 that she was going to be thrown on the floor during Resident 1's shower if she would not stop yelling. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to verbal abuse, which could result in emotional and psychological distress. Findings: On November 2, 2023, at 10:57 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an allegation of abuse. On November 2, 2023, at 11:02 a.m., the Administrator (ADM) was interviewed. The ADM stated an allegation of verbal abuse was reported from the student CNAs and their instructor who witnessed the incident. He stated the student CNAs and the instructor heard CNA 1 telling Resident 1 that she was going to be thrown to the floor during her shower if she would not stop yelling. On November 2, 2023, at 11:12 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered care plan for dementia (memory loss) was developed, for one of three residents (Resident A) reviewed for dementia care. This failure had the potential for Resident A not to receive the appropriate interventions to manage symptoms of dementia. Findings: On August 7, 2023, at 9:40 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On August 7, 2023, at 9:46 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated Resident A was observed to have discolorations on her body on July 23, 2023, at around 9 a.m. The DON stated Resident A claimed that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) from the previous night was rough during care. The DON stated Resident A was screaming and scratching at the CNA while care was being provided. She stated the CNA then grabbed Resident A's both arms and hands to prevent the resident from scratching her. The DON stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the physician for one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) episode of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential for delayed treatment of hypoglycemia for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (inability to regulate blood sugar) and hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal). The document indicated the resident was her own representative. A review of Resident 1's physician orders indicated the following: a.HumaLOG Kwikpen subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 100 unit/ml (milliliter- a unit of measure) (insulin Lispro) inject as per sliding scale: if 61-150=0 units; 151-200=0 units; 201-250=2 units; 251-300=4 units; 301-350=8 units; 351-400=10 units; > (greater than) 400 md/dl notify MD (Medical Doctor), subcutaneously two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the trash containers were not overfilled and the lids kept securely closed to prevent the potential attraction of pests and vermin (nuisance animals that could spread diseases). This facility failure increased the potential for attracting insects and vermin, which could result in food-borne illnesses in a highly susceptible population of 68 residents. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on December 4, 2022, at 11:34 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). There were three garbage bins located outside the kitchen approximately 40 feet away in the alley, by the iron fence in front of the back yard. One extra large white metal bin, identified by the DS as the recycle bin, was uncovered and contained multiple boxes that overfilled the bin. In addition, one of the two lids intended to cover the trash bin, was missing. Approximately 6 feet to the side of the recycle bin was one extra large dark gray Burrtec metal bin, identified by the DS as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional care and services were provided, for four of 14 residents reviewed (Residents 3, 5, 27, and 48) for nutrition, when: 1. For Resident 3, there was no follow up evaluations and interventions to address the resident's nutritional status after she had a 3.3% weight loss in a week on September 1, 2022, and continued to refuse to be weighed. In addition, Resident 3's low albumin and Vitamin D level were not referred to the Registered Dietitian (RD) for further evaluation and recommendation. This failure resulted in Resident 3's weight loss of 30 lbs. (pounds)/10% from September 1, 2022 to December 7, 2022 (three months). 2. For Resident 5, there was no follow up evaluation and recommendation by the RD to address Resident 5's weight loss of 14 lbs/7.3% in a month (August 18, 2022 to September 20, 2022). In addition, the RD's recommendation on November 10, 2022, to refer to the physician Resident 5's significant weight loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The intravenous (IV - given through a vein) medication cart was locked when not in use. This failure had the potential for the IV medication cart to be accessible to residents, unlicensed staff, and visitors; 2. Expired IV medication were removed from the medication cart. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive expired medications with less potency and/or experience serious adverse outcomes; and 3. Three (3) bags of IV medications were removed from the medication cart after the order was completed. This failure had the potential for the medication to be available for use to other residents. Findings: On December 4, 2022, at 9:20 a.m., an unlocked IV medication cart was observed in station one hallway. In a concurrent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, she stated the IV medication cart was left unlocked. She stated it should always be locked when not in use. The IV medication cart was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when several food items were undated or stored beyond their use by dates, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings: On December 4, 2022, beginning at 10:14 a.m., a concurrent kitchen inspection and interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS - [NAME]). The following were found in the dry storage area, readily available for use: - Three packs (12 pieces per pack = 36 pieces) and seven pieces of hotdog rolls labeled with a use by date of November 12, 2022. The DS stated bread can be on the shelves for seven days from the delivery date and to be discarded after the use by date. The DS acknowledged the hotdog rolls had been on the shelf more than two weeks beyond the use by date and should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct and implement a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to address the residents' weight loss. This failure had the potential for the facility to not take preventative measures for weight loss. Findings: On December 8, 2022, at 4:03 p.m., the Administrator (ADM) was interviewed. He stated the QAPI programs were initiated and discussed by the QAPI committee monthly. The QAPI committee included but not limited to the ADM, the Director of Nursing (DON), the Medical Director (MD), and the department directors and supervisors. The ADM stated weight management was not included in their monthly QAPI meetings. He stated the QAPI committee was not able to identify resident care issues such as weight loss. Therefore, the QAPI committee was not able to initiate measures to improve weight loss. He stated the facility initiated a QAPI program to address the weight loss on December 8, 2022, after the survey team identified the weight loss at the start of the survey on December 4, 2022. The ADM presented the QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, three Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) failed to implement appropriate hand hygiene during passing of meal trays and feeding the residents. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of communicable diseases and infections to residents and other staff members. Findings: On December 4, 2022, at 12:32 p.m., CNA 1 was observed placing a lunch meal tray in front of Resident 6, in room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 1 was observed to set up resident's meal tray, removed the lid on the plate, and opened other items for resident to eat and drink. CNA 1 left the resident's room and did not perform hand hygiene. Then CNA 1 proceeded to pour two (2) cups of coffee from the coffee cart and brought them to the resident in another room. On December 4, 2022, at 12:35 p.m., CNA 2 was observed to have picked up meal tray from a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER], after feeding the resident. CNA 2 left the room and placed meal tray onto the meal cart in the hallway. Then CNA 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-12 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written notification regarding the facility's bed hold policy (holding a bed for up to seven [7] days if a resident is transferred to a general acute hospital or goes on therapeutic leave), was provided to the resident or resident representative, for one of three residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident 37) when Resident 37 was transferred to the acute care hospital on September 9, 2022, September 16, 2022, and September 27, 2022. This failure had the potential to result in the resident or resident representative losing the opportunity to secure the right to reside in the facility past the bed hold duration policy time frame. Findings: On December 5, 2022, at 12:03 p.m., Resident 37 was interviewed. She stated her recent readmission was her third time back to the facility after she was sent to the acute care hospital. On December 12, 2022, Resident 37's record was reviewed. Resident 37 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was completed accurately, for one of one resident reviewed for smoking (Resident 12). This failure had the potential for not identifying the resident as a safety risk to self and other residents in the facility and implement appropriate interventions. Findings: On December 4, 2022, at 3:19 p.m., Resident 12 was observed lying in bed. During a concurrent interview, Resident 12 stated she would smoke once a day at around 1:30 p.m. She stated she was the only smoker at the facility. On December 7, 2022, Resident 12's record was reviewed. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar). The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated August 22, 2022, indicated Resident 12 did not use tobacco. On December 7, 2022, at 3:50 p.m., Resident 12's record was reviewed with the MDS Coordinator. She stated she made a mistake by not indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment regarding a resident's change of condition, for one of three residents reviewed for closed record (Resident 167). In addition, the facility failed to implement the physician's order for IV (intravenous - through the vein) hydration. This failure resulted in a rapid decline in Resident 167's condition and may have potentially contributed to Resident 167's demise. Findings: On [DATE], at 3:56 p.m., Resident 167's record was reviewed. Resident 167 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of the sacrum (triangular bone in the lower back), falls, anemias (lack of healthy red blood cells), and high blood pressure. The History and Physical, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 167 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. The Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a document honoring a resident's wishes for care and treatment), dated [DATE], indicated, .Attempt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a referral to an eye specialist was scheduled, for one of one resident reviewed for vision/hearing (Resident 24). This failure resulted in Resident 24 not receiving the proper evaluation to determine other contributing factors for her vision loss, and had the potential to have a delay in receiving the proper treatment to maintain and/or preserve her remaining vision. Findings: On December 5, 2022, at 10:35 a.m., Resident 24's Significant Other (SO) was interviewed via telephone. The SO stated he was aware that Resident 24 had vision loss but was not sure if the facility addressed the problem with her eyesight. On December 5, 2022, Resident 24's record was reviewed. Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and legal blindness (occurs when a person has vision that allows them to see straight ahead of them of 20/200 [a person can see at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$66,151 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $66,151 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-13 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST97%since 04/28/2010
WEISS, JONATHANIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2010
CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2025
LIN, SAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/28/2010
THOMAS, DILLONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/17/2025
INDIO-LET LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$258K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 24%Other / private 27%

This home reported $258K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$420per resident / day
operating cost
$12,774per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$462per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555084. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next