Driftwood Healthcare Center
4109 Emerald St, Torrance, CA 90503 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (310) 371-4628 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $22,601 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-19)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 75.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.94 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.04 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 30.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.3%CMS range 44.9–59.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.3–12.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 30.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 24.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.5–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 93.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were on dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing) minced and moist (mechanical-soft texture modified diet for difficulty chewing and swallowing) diet received food consistent with diet order and according to the minced and moist diet menu recipe for seven of eight sampled resident (Resident 10, 11, 50, 53, 62, 81, and 83). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Dietary Supervisor (DS), who was overseeing meal preparation, [NAME] (CK 1) who was preparing the residents' meals, and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4), who was validating the meal on residents' trays for diet appropriateness and food texture before meal was served to the residents, ensured Resident 10, 11, 50, 53, 62, 81, and 83 received correct food consistency per their prescribed diet. 2. Ensure Resident 10, 11, 50, 53, 62, 81, and 83 did not receive a ground pimento cheese salad sandwich (sandwich included two slices of regular [not minced] white…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Responsible Party (RP), who was a Conservator (a person appointed by a court to manage the financial or personal affairs of someone who is unable to do so themselves due to illness, disability, or other incapacitation), appointed by the Los Angeles County Office of the Public Guardian, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was informed of the risks and benefits of psychoactive medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness or behavior) and allowed to give their consent for Resident 1 to continue use of the medication, versus providing this information to Resident 1's FM and allowing her to give consent for Resident 1's use of the medication. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's Conservator being unaware of medications Resident 1 was prescribed and the inability to make decisions regarding Resident 1's care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Responsible Party (RP), who was a Conservator (a person appointed by a court to manage the financial or personal affairs of someone who is unable to do so themselves due to illness, disability, or other incapacitation), appointed by the Los Angeles County Office of the Public Guardian, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was involved in the development of Resident 1's a discharge plan to reflect Resident 1's discharge needs, goals, and treatment preferences. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being inappropriately discharged from the facility with a Family Member (FM), who was not Resident 1's Conservator and placed Resident 1 at risk for decline in health and non-continuity of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the spread of infection for 91 of 91 residents in the facility by failing to: 1. Ensure the hot water temperature logs of the washing machines were accurate and monitored daily.2. Implement policies and procedures (P&P) of proper washing machine temperatures and accurate documentation logs. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infection to all 91 residents in the facility.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/7/2025 at 4:15 p.m. with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS), the HS stated the staff should record the temperatures of the washing machine daily on the Washer Water Temperature Log. The HS stated he did not actually take the temperatures of the hot water and stated the previous managers told him to write 160 degrees (unit of measurement) on the temperature log daily. During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/8/2025 at 9:00 a.m. with the Laundry Assistant (LA), the LA stated the correct temperature of the washing machines should be 160 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage according to requirements indicated on the pharmacy label and labelling medications when: 1.One vial of unopened Humulin R [type of insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication)] was not stored inside the refrigerator. 2.One bottle of unopened latanoprost eye drops (medication used to manage elevated pressure in the eye) was not stored inside the refrigerator. 3.One bottle of artificial tears (lubricating eye drops used to help relieve dry and irritated eyes) was not labeled with resident's full name, bottle showed room number, had a broken seal, and no open date. 4. One bottle of omeprazole sodium liquid (medication used to reduce stomach acid) was not removed from use after the label discard date of 8/6/2025. 5. One bottle of AZO Cranberry (used to aid in maintaining urinary tract health) was not labeled with an open date.6.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food, pathogenic bacteria, viruses, or parasites that contaminate food, as well as toxins) for 85 out of 91 total residents in the facility by failing to:A. Ensure food items were labelled, dated, and sealed properly.B. Discard expired thickened water and kiwi strawberry flavored syrup for juice dispenser.C. Follow a meal ticket/tray card during tray line (Resident's trays are assembled and check for accuracy before food is delivered to them).D. Ensure [NAME] (CK) 2 did not wear jewelry while serving food during tray line.E. Ensure Dietary Aid (DA)1 performed hand hygiene and wear gloves while placing residents' utensils on tray during tray line.These failures had the potential to affect residents and to result in pathogen (germ) exposure and placed residents at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 15) by failing to:a. Ensure Resident 6, who had a diagnosis of depression (a serious mood disorder that affects how you think, feel, and handle daily activities) and taking an antidepressant medication (medications used to treat depression and other conditions) was documented on the medical diagnosis list.b. Ensure Resident 15's Medication Administration Record for the month of August 2025 was accurate when it indicated Resident 15 received Naloxone (a medicine that rapidly reverses an opioid [strong pain medication] overdose) on 8/1/2025, when Resident 15 did not receive Naloxone.These deficient practices resulted in Resident 15 having a documented medication error in the MAR, had the potential to negatively impact the provision of necessary care and services and portray an inaccurate reflection of Resident 6 diagnosis list in the facility. Findings: a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to ensure the call light device was in reach for one out of three residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay of care and the Resident 1 needs not being met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/6/2025 at 4:00 p.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 was in bed with the call light next to his lower right hip. Resident 1 stated he would like to call for help but is not able to call his nurse. Resident 1 stated when he needs help, he usually yells to his roommate to call a nurse when he needs assistance. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including functional quadriplegic ( a complete inability to move due to severe physical disability or frailty without any physical injury), hypotension (low blood pressure) and contracture of muscles multiple sites…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate a claim of missing belongings for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 8).This deficient practice resulted in Resident 8 missing her blanket for three months.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (face sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility 10/26/2018 with diagnoses including muscle weakness and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life).During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/19/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 8 had severe cognitive impairment (inability to plan and carry out regular tasks and apply judgment).During a review of Resident 8's Inventory of Personal Effects dated 4/24/2024 and updated on 7/28/2025, the Inventory of Personal Effects section under lost, and stolen was updated to include four blankets missing per family member (FM) 1.During a review of Resident 8's Theft/ Loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) were not used unnecessarily for one of five sampled residents (Resident 66) by failing to define and monitor resident specific, measurable target behaviors related to the use of Seroquel [an atypical antipsychotic used to improve mood, thoughts, and behaviors] for people with schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and bipolar disorder (mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs)] for Resident 66.These deficient practices increased the risk of Resident 66 experiencing adverse effects (unwanted or dangerous medication-related side effects) such as drowsiness, dizziness, constipation, or increased risk of fall, and possibly leading to impairment or decline in their mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status.Findings:During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled residents (Resident 6) had their Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR], a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) completed accurately.This deficient practice had the potential to delay care for Resident 6 and had the potential of not receiving the proper level of care or services required.Findings:During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance or illness elsewhere in the body that disrupts the brain's normal functioning, leading to various brain symptoms), rhabdomyolysis (a serious condition where damaged muscle tissue breaks down, releasing its contents into the bloodstream that can lead to kidney damage), post-traumatic stress disorder ([PTSD], a mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 54 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for two of the three sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 6) by failing to:A. Ensure Resident 52 had a care plan for impaired hearing. B. Ensure Resident 6 who had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder ([PTSD], a mental health condition that's caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event, either being part of it or witnessing it), had a care plan and included the use of psychotropic medications for mood disorders. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the quality of life and wellbeing for Resident 6 and Resident 52 and could result in preventing them from achieving their highest practical well-being or needs not being met. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 52’s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) and major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication listed on the oral medications' Emergency kit (Ekit) index (list) matched the medication found inside the Ekit.This failure had the potential to result in a delay in the administration of emergency medication and medication error.Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 at Nurses' Station 1 of the Ekit on 8/7/2025 at 11:27 a.m., the medication listed on slot number 25 in the Ekit medication list indicated potassium chloride 20 milliequivalents (mEq, unit of weight). The medication observed in slot 25 was four tablets of nitrofurantoin 50 milligrams (mg, unit of weight). Registered Nurse (RN ) 1 stated the pharmacist verifies the Ekit contents when delivered to the facility. RN 1 stated if a medication was not in the Ekit, there was a risk for medication error, or delay in administration of the needed medication.During a telephone interview on 8/7/2025 at 11:47 a.m., the dispensing pharmacist (Pharmacist) stated Ekits were re-filled when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to document monitoring on the medication administration record (MAR) for signs and symptoms of bleeding for one out of three residents (Resident 63) who is on Apixaban (a medication that thins the blood, prevents clots). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 63 having blood in the stool or urine, bruising or severe headaches. Findings:During a review of Resident 63's admission Record (face sheet) dated 8/8/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypotension (low blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) and atrial flutter (a heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers of the heart beat very rapidly, typically between 250 and 350 times per minute).During a review of Resident 63's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 63 was dependent (resident does none of the effort to complete the activity or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the health, welfare, and rights for 94 of 94 residents by failing to implement the facility's written abuse policy and procedure (P&P) to suspend Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 2 who were involved in the alleged abuse allegation. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk of abuse and had the potential for Resident 1 to feel unprotected and unsafe in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and cerebral infarction (when part of your brain dies its blood supply is cut off). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 5/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was intact and was dependent (helper does all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the personal belongs for one of two sampled resident's (Resident 1), who was discharged from the facility on 1/17/2025, were made available to Resident 1 and/or Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) and/or Family Member (FM). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's being discharged to a Board and Care ([B&C] a type of small, residential facility that provides housing and personal care services to individuals who need assistance with ADLs) facility without her personal belongings and had the potential for Resident 1 to feel detached in her new environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 12/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was unable to make decisions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who was diagnosed with dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and who lacked the capacity to understand and make decisions was discharged appropriately from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being discharged to a Board and Care ([B&C] (a type of small, residential facility that provides housing and personal care services to individuals who need assistance with ADLs) facility on [DATE] without an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT] a team comprised of healthcare professionals from different discipline collaborating to develop and coordinate the residents' care plans such as a discharge plan with a goal to optimize the resident outcomes) discharge meeting, prior discharge planning, Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) and/or Family Member (FM) provided with a Notice of Proposed Discharge/Transfer 30 days prior to the resident's transfer, assessment of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who was observed with a discoloration on her forehead, black eye and eye swelling was reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure resulted in CDPH being unable to investigate Resident 1's injury of unknown origin in a timely manner Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (a long term condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood), abnormalities of gait and mobility, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/26/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) who was observed with discoloration on her forehead, black eye and eye swelling on 3/20/2025 was investigated into the history of her injury and to rule out abuse and neglect. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified abuse and/or neglect in the facility and the failure to protect residents from abuse and neglect. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney disease (a long term condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood), abnormalities of gait and mobility, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from sexual abuse. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 entering Resident 1's room unbeknownst to staff on 3/17/2025 at approximately 11 p.m., unfastening her (Resident 1's) incontinent brief and touching her private area, causing Resident 1 to feel scared and helpless. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer emotional consequences and for other residents in the facility to be subject to the same abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H/P), dated 3/8/2025, the H/P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when they did not interview other residents in the facility, following an allegation made by Resident 1 that Resident 2 came to her room, which was confirmed by the facility's video surveillance, and touched her private parts. This deficient practice resulted in the inability of the facility to determine if Resident 2 had a behavior of entering other resident's rooms and touching them. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/8/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool), dated 3/14/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled resident's (Resident 1) discharge planning and discharge procedures were implemented and documented prior to and when was Resident 1 was discharged from the facility (2/27/2025). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 being discharged from the facility without prior discharge planning or documentation that he received discharge instructions when he left the faciity on 2/27/2025. This deficient practice had the for Resident 1 to be unaware of his care needs and follow up appointments. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 2/3/2025 with diagnosis including paraplegia (when a person is unable to move their lower body), anxiety disorder (a condition that involves persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), major depressive disorder ([MDD] a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), cannabis (marijuana) dependence and psychoactive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) was supervised by the facility staff while smoking. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 5 smoking unsupervised on/near the facility's parking lot with the use of a cigarette lighter, without wearing a smoking apron, or having a receptacle to safely dispose of his used cigarette(s). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 5 to sustain burn injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cerebrovascular disease ([stroke] a condition that affects the blood flow to the brain), right side hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body), and glaucoma (an eye condition that damages the optic nerve that can lead to vision loss or blindness). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Occupational Therapist (OT- a healthcare provider who helps a person meet goals to develop, recover, improve, and maintain skills needed for daily living and working) 1 accurately documented on the OT Discharge Summary Note the discharge goals for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). OT 1 documented on 9/13/2024, Resident 3 tolerated thin hand rolled washcloth for four hours in her left hand without irritation or skin breakdown, when it should have been the documented for the right hand. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate documentation of Resident 3's OT Discharge Summary Note and had the potential to affect Resident 3's plan of care and treatment. Findings: During a review of the Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 3) who had a designated Advocate (AD 1) was invited to participate in the Interdisciplinary Team Meeting ([IDT] a team of health care professionals from different disciplines who work together to provide care for a resident) to discuss and participate in the revision of the care plan (a document that summarizes a resident ' s health conditions, care needs, current treatments, goals, and action plan) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 ' s AD 1 not attending the IDT meeting and had the potential to result in a care plan that was not person-centered (designed specifically around the individual needs, preferences and goals of the resident receiving care) and would not meet Resident 3 ' s needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of five sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4), who were high-risk for falls, had wheelchairs that locked. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident ' s 3 and Resident 4 to sustain falls and injuries resulting from the fall such as a hematoma (a collection of blood outside of a blood vessel caused by a broken blood vessel), fractures (broken bones), hospitalization, and possible death resulting from complications of the fall. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular and often rapid heartbeat in the upper chambers of the heart), thrombophilia (a condition which the body has a high probability of creating blood clots), functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of medical records upon written request from an authorized legal representative ([LR] a person who is legally authorized to act on behalf of another) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) within two working days. This deficient practice violated Resident 2 ' s right to obtain a copy of their medical record and delayed their appeal to Health Insurance Provider (HIP) ' s decision to deny Resident 2 covered (paid for by insurance) stay at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities with gait (a person ' s manner of walking) and mobility (the ability to move freely or lack thereof), and Charcot ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to retain, accurately document, systematically organize, and have readily accessible medical records for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Documentation Retention. This deficient practice had the potential Resident 2 to have unnecessary stress and fear of being kicked out of the facility due to Health Insurance Provider (HIP) not being given the clinical documents needed to support her continued insurance coverage to stay at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities with gait (a person ' s manner of walking) and mobility (the ability to move freely or lack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was able to return to her room upon readmission from a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing frustration and sadness after being placed in a new room upon return from the GACH. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record (Face Sheet), dated 9/27/2024, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition in which the blood doesn ' t have enough oxygen) and embolism (blood clot) of right femoral vein (a large blood vessel in the thigh). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/14/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had the ability to understand and be understood by others. During a review of Resident 1's Transfer Form, dated 9/25/2024, the Transfer Form indicated Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility ice machine was cleaned and maintain per manufacturer guidelines for 83 out of 85 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms (an organism that can be seen only through a microscope) and could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage of contaminated food) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization for all residents, staff, and visitors consuming the ice from the ice machine. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 8/14/2024 at 2:41 p.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS opened the ice machine door and wiped the soft black durometer trim (helps silence the ice bin door) attached to the ice storage bin using a clean white tissue paper. Observed the white tissue paper with brown in color after passing over the soft durometer trim. The MS stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-19 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide annual documentation including the Quality Assessment Assurance Committee([QAA] to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] designated to bring about constant and measurable improvement in the services provided at the facility for continual improvement of quality care) team signatures to verify reviewing of their dietary department policies. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility staff to perform outdated practices. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/16/2024 at 3:22 p.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the Manual Signature/Approval Form dated 1/3/23 was reviewed. The DS stated the Manual Signature/Approval Form dated 1/3/23 did not have a title to indicate which policies were being reviewed and stated this is the most recent review completed. The DS stated the policies are reviewed when the company tells them there are new policies coming. The DS was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Quality Assessment Assurance Committee([QAA] to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] designated to bring about constant and measurable improvement in the services provided at the facility for continual improvement of quality care) failed to identify skills competencies of the dietary staff and assessments of the residents meal trays to ensure therapeutic diets were served as prescribed by the physician. This failure resulted in placing the residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate meal tray based on their diet orders and potentially choking on their food. Findings: During an interview on 8/19/2024, at 12:37 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Dietary Supervisor (DS) should have noticed the wrong diets were being provided to the residents and brought it to the Administrators (ADM) attention. DON states QAA meetings are held to identify issues that are or potentially effecting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff including licensed vocational nurses (LVNs) and certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were competent on food textures including physician prescribed diet of dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing) minced and moist diet (mechanical-soft texture modified diet for difficulty chewing and swallowing) to ensure correct food consistency were distributed to seven of eight sampled residents (Resident 10, 11, 50, 53, 62, 81, and 83). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 10, 11, 50, 53, 62, 81, and 83 received a lunch tray on 8/14/2024 that contained a ground pimento cheese salad sandwich (sandwich included 2 slices of white bread, including the crust, with a scoop of ground pimento cheese in between the bread, sliced in half) while on a dysphagia minced and moist (ground) diet. This deficient practice placed Resident 10, 11, 50, 53, 62, 81, and 83 at risk for aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. ensure follow up appointment for dental pain evaluation/ referral was completed for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 51). b. ensure follow up appointment for routine foot care podiatry (study of feet) evaluation/ referral was completed for one out of two sampled residents, Resident 56. These deficient practices resulted in a delay of necessary foot care and dental services. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission record ([Face sheet] a document that provides brief patient information), dated 8/16/2024, the face sheet indicated, Resident 51 was originally admitted on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (chronic condition that affects how the body processes sugar) with chronic kidney disease ([CKD] a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function over time), unspecified severe protein- calorie malnutrition (insufficient intake or absorption of food), legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff including the registered dietician (RD), dietary supervisor (DS), the cook (CK 1), and dietary aide (DA 1) were competent about preparing and serving a physician prescribed diet for dysphagia (difficulty chewing and swallowing) minced and moist diet (mechanical-soft texture modified diet for difficulty chewing and swallowing). As a result of this deficient practice, 7 out of 8 sampled residents (Resident 10, resident 11, Resident 50, Resident 53, Resident 62, Resident 81, and Resident 83) on a dysphagia minced and moist (ground) diet received a lunch tray on 8/14/2024 that contained a ground pimento cheese salad sandwich (sandwich included 2 slices of white bread, including the crust, with a scoop of ground pimento cheese in between the bread, sliced in half). This deficient practice placed Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 50, Resident 53, Resident 62, Resident 81, and Resident 83 at risk for aspiration (breathing in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records were updated to show documentation that an advance directive (legal document that states your wishes for medical care if you are unable to communicate with them due to illness or injury) was discussed and written information was provided to the resident or responsible party for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 72). This failure resulted in a violation of the residents' and/or residents representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directive and had the potential to cause conflict with the resident's wishes regarding health care. Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record, Resident 72 was admitted [DATE], with a diagnosis of encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), intracerebral hemorrhage (a type of stroke that causes bleeding in your head) and heart failure (heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess mental capacity (ability to make decisions) and provide information to one of three sampled residents (Resident 83) before signing the arbitration agreement (AA- a way of resolving a dispute without filing a lawsuit and going to court). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 83 not fully understanding their right to limit opportunities to initiate judicial proceedings that challenge unfavorable decisions. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS- a condition in a child that results from alcohol exposure during the mother's pregnancy) and autistic disorder (developmental disability that affects how the brain processes information and how people communicate and interact with the world). During a review of Resident 83's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary team meeting (conference discussing the residents care plan comprised of different members of the healthcare team from different specialties]), including one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) and Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP1), convened to discuss the status of Resident 1's hearing loss, pending audiologist (specialists who evaluate, diagnose, treat, and manage hearing loss) appointment, and status of the requested hearing aids (sound amplifying device used to assist people with hearing loss). These deficient practices violated Resident 1's rights and resulted in Resident 1 and RP 1 feeling frustrated leading to a potential decline in Resident 1's psychosocial health. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified hearing loss and major depressive disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had hearing loss and requested hearing aids (sound amplifying device used to assist people with hearing loss) had an appointment with the audiologist (specialists who evaluate, diagnose, treat, and manage hearing loss) to perform an audiogram (hearing test) after the Otolaryngologist (specialist who treats conditions of the ears, nose and throat) ordered for the resident to see the audiologist on 1/5/2024. These deficient practices resulted in a delay in the process for Resident 1 to acquire hearing aids leading to a potential decline in Resident 1's psychosocial health. As of 5/8/2024, four months after the order was made, Resident 1 has not had the audiogram. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease (high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure records were provided within 48 hours following a request by Responsible Party 1(RP 1) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in the inability of Resident 1 and/or Resident 1's RP to access requested records and violated Resident 1's rights to have access to his records. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission records (Face sheet), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including spondylosis (a small crack between two back bones in your spine) without myelopathy (an injury to the back bones caused by severe compression), cervical region (neck region of your back bone), chronic diastolic (the pause between heart beats) heart failure (heart's capacity to pump blood cannot keep up with the body's need), and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before applying new gloves when cleaning the gastrostomy tube ([G- tube]-a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach) and applying a dry dressing for one out three sampled residents, Resident 2. This deficient practice had the potential to cause cross contamination (transfer of germs from one object to another) and cause a serious skin infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 admission record (face sheet), dated 3/20/24, the face sheet indicated, Resident 2 was originally admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis including adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that is multifactorial may be caused by chronic concurrent diseases and functional impairments), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), encounter for attention to gastrostomy (an artificial entrance to the stomach attended to), cellulitis of abdominal wall (a common potentially serious bacterial sin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility a. Failed to develop individualized interventions for one of three resident's (Resident 1's) care plan to prevent falls, and b. Failed to develop a care plan for one of three resident's (Resident 1) noncompliance with the use of call lights and noncompliance with ambulating without assistance. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at higher risk for falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, dated 9/21/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis including generalized muscle weakness, anemia (a condition in which there are too few red blood cells to carry oxygen to the body ' s tissues), other abnormalities of gait and mobility (an unusual walking pattern that may be caused by underlying health conditions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s H&P, dated 8/28/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 presented to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) emergency room (ER) for generalized weakness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one resident's( Resident 1) fall risk evaluation, dated 8/19/2023, was accurate. The deficient practice resulted in an incorrect depiction of Resident 1's fall risk and potentially impacted the care rendered and received by Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, dated 9/21/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis including generalized muscle weakness, anemia (a condition in which there are too few red blood cells to carry oxygen to the body ' s tissues), other abnormalities of gait and mobility (an unusual walking pattern that may be caused by underlying health conditions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s history and physical (H&P), dated 8/28/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 presented to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) emergency room (ER) for generalized weakness and a fall at home. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ( MDS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by not addressing the noise of a low air loss mattress ([LAL] mattress powered by a pump or blower system used to reduce pressure in the skin) in resident ' s room. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for discomfort and ringing of ears. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s face sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (common infection of the body ' s drainage system for removing urine) During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 2 ' s cognition (thought process) and Resident 2 required limited assistance with eating, required extensive assistance with dressing, and was totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toilet use. personal hygiene and dressing. During an observation on 8/1/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a functioning call light (alerting device used by patients to signal assistance from staff members) of one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had a potential to place Resident 3 at risk for accidents and a delay in meeting the resident ' s needs for assistance. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included morbid obesity (overweight), muscle weakness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] group of lung diseases that block the airflow and make it difficult to breathe). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 7/31/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 3 was able to make independent decisions that were reasonable and consistent. The MDS indicated Resident 3 required two persons assist with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program which prevents the spread of infection and COVID-19 (a respiratory disease caused by a coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2) when: a. Staff failed to complete a self-screen for temperature and symptoms of COVID-19 prior to starting their shift. b. Staff failed to [NAME] and Doff before entering a contact precaution room (Resident 23). This deficient practice could potentially spread and expose residents and staff to COVID-19. Findings: During an interview on 12/4/2021, at 9:00 am, with Screener/Restorative Nurse Assistant (Scr/RNA) 2 stated the process for screening staff upon entering the facility was self-screening and logging of temperature on the screening log. Staff members proceed to perform hand hygiene after self-screening for temperature and symptoms of COVID-19. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/4/2021 at 9:20 am, with the Scr/RNA 2 the daily visitors, vendors and medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sample residents' (15, 25, 59) call lights were within reach. For residents 15, 25, and 59, their call lights were lying on the floor underneath the residents' beds. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Residents 15, 25, and 59 from maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being to the extent possible in accordance with the resident's own needs and preferences. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 15's diagnoses included: history of a stroke, vascular dementia (a progressive loss of brain function affecting memory, thinking, and behavior that interferes with daily functioning, caused by a stroke) and diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three randomly selected residents (Residents 28) reviewed for changes in Medicare coverage were provided with the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) appeal process in a timely manner. This deficient practice had the potential to result in responsible parties not being able to exercise their right to file an appeal. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form indicated the resident last covered day for Medicare Part A Skilled Services was 11/14/2021. SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form indicated Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form was not given. During an interview on 12/6/2021, at 9:09 a.m., with Social Services Director ( SSD), SSD stated, that NOMNC form needs to be given to resident 72 hours prior to last day covered Medicare. SSD stated that resident and/or resident representative should receive NOMNC appeal process information. SSD stated that she did not give Resident 28 NOMNC for prior to discharge. During an interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide one of one residents (34) privacy during wound care. Resident 34's privacy curtain would not pull completely to the end of the track, exposing Resident 34 to the hallway. This deficient practice did not allow Resident 34 the right to privacy during care. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 34's diagnoses included: pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure) in the sacral region (near buttocks), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), functional quadriplegia (a loss of sensation, function, or movement in arms and/or legs). During a review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident 41's lost prescription reading glasses was resolved in a timely manner. This deficient practice resulted in the resident having decreased vision and negatively affected the resident's quality of life. Findings: On 12/02/21 at 10:06 a.m. during an interview with Resident 41, the resident stated she lost her eye glasses, and had reported the loss to her nurse. Resident 41 stated the facility staff do not attempt to find her belongings or reimburse her when she reportsed her items lost. The resident stated she does not feel good about not seeing clearly without her eye glasses. On 12/06/21 at 8:44 a.m. during an interview with the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 11), the CNA stated when a resident reports a lost item, she would look for the item in the closet, check the laundry and talk to the charge nurse if she could not find the item. On 12/06/21 at 8:50 a.m. during an interview with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) the LVN stated when a resident reports a lost item, she would look in the laundry and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan for two of two residents (Resident 41 and 75). a. Resident 41 had impaired vision and did not have a care plan to address the impaired vision. b. Resident 75 had an intravenous (IV) site and was receiving IV iron (Venofer) for anemia, however, there was no care plan for the IV site and no care plan for receiving iron with a diagnosis of anemia. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for harm and injury and impact the residents' quality of care. Findings: a. On 12/02/2021 at 10:06 a.m. during an interview with Resident 41, the resident stated her vision was terrible, she saw double and does not feel good about not seeing clearly. On 12/06/2021 at 10:00 a.m. during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated when a resident had impaired vision the process was to call the medical doctor (MD) to get an order to be seen by the eyes, ears, nose and throat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the correct volume of oxygen ordered by the physician for one (1) out of the two (2) sampled residents (Resident 42). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 42 receiving incorrect oxygen than required and can negatively impact the resident's health and well-being. During a review of the Resident's 42 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 42 diagnoses included acute kidney failure (kidneys are not working well), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), partial intestinal obstruction (food is prevented from passing normally through the bowel). During a review of Resident 42 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 11/30/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 42 had severe impairment in cognitive (ability to learn, remember, understand, and make decision)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care for one of one residents (75). The toe nails on Resident 75's two big toes were long and curved. The facility did not know the last time Resident 75 had seen a podiatrist. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 75 to experience discomfort and complications with mobility and foot health. Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 75's diagnoses included: history of a stroke, blood clots in the legs, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a progressive lung disease that causes coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath and makes it difficult to breath), heart failure and diabetes mellitus (disease in which blood glucose/blood sugar levels are too high). During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately record fluid intake for one of one sampled resident (Resident 11) with fluid restrictions. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fluid overload or swelling for Resident 11. Findings: During a review of the Resident's 11 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 11 diagnoses included acute on chronic congestive heart failure ([CHF] heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), chronic kidney disease Stage 3 (kidneys are not working well), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood). During a review of Resident 11 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/16/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 11 had moderate impairment in cognitive (ability to learn, remember, understand, and make decision) skills for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date/label a peripheral intravenous (IV) site dressing for one of one residents (75), per facility policy and staff were unsure how often the dressing should be changed. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 75 to experience medication leaking around the IV insertion site, redness, swelling, and infection at the IV site. Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 75's diagnoses included: history of a stroke, blood clots in the legs, heart failure, diabetes mellitus (disease in which blood glucose/blood sugar levels are too high) and anemia (low number of red blood cells). During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 11/11/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 75's cognition (mental capacity to make decisions, ability to remember, learn,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to a. ensure oxygen tubing was labelled with a change date for one of one resident (Resident 42). This deficient practice had the potential for complications associated with oxygen therapy for the resident. b. follows their policy and procedure for displaying a No smoking on the door for two of two sample residents (Resident 42 and 62) who was receiving oxygen therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of injury due to a fire hazard. Findings: a. During a review of the Resident's 42 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 42 diagnoses included acute kidney failure (kidneys are not working well), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), partial intestinal obstruction (food is prevented from passing normally through the bowel). During a review of Resident 42 's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the staff failed to reassess the pain level (intensity) to determine if one of one resident (Resident 177) could benefit from an as needed pain medication in between the routine pain medications to ensure the breakthrough pain was relieved. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 's 177 experiencing pain during dressing changes. Findings: During a review of the Resident's admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident diagnoses included acute kidney failure (kidneys are not working well), cellulitis (skin infection) of right and left lower limb, Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body fails to metabolize (process) glucose (sugar) correctly), pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of the sacral region (tailbone). During a review of Resident 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted and in a visible and prominent place on a daily basis. As a result, the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by staff was not readily accessible to residents and visitors. Findings: During an observation on 12/3/21 at 1: 50 p.m., no visible nursing staffing posting was present at Nursing Station. During an observation 12/6/21 at 10:26 a.m., nursing staffing was posted on a white stand in a clear covered plastic protector at one side of the nursing station. During an interview with DON on 12/6/21 at 10:26 a.m. regarding posted staffing, DON replied, Usually HR posts daily staffing numbers; HR calculates everything for how many nursing hours and posts it every day. HR is also responsible for keeping track of previous postings. During the interview, DON stated, The purpose of posting the staffing is so we will know how many hours for nursing. It is near the nursing station on this white stand covered with the plastic at the side of nursing station. DON states,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that it is free of a medication error rate of less than five percent as evidenced by the identification of two out of two medication errors based on 27 medication opportunities, that yield a facility medication error rate of 7.41percent during medication administration. The following two medication errors occurred for: 1. The facility failed to administer scheduled blood pressure medications for Resident 16 as ordered. 2. The facility failed to administer full dose of medication for Resident 69 as ordered. This deficient practice had a potential to place two out of two resident's at risk for causing the resident discomfort and/or jeopardizes his or her health and safety. Findings: a. During a review of the admission record dated December 6, 2021, Resident 69 (R69) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for intestinal obstruction/partial ileus (a painful obstruction of the intestine) and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three out of three residents were free from significant medication error by failing to: 1. To administer scheduled blood pressure medications as ordered. 2. To administer full dose of medication as ordered. 3. Ensure medications at resident bedside had a physician order. This deficient practice had a potential to place four out of four residents' at risk for causing the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his or her health and safety. Findings: a. During a review of the admission record dated December 6, 2021, Resident 69 (R69) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for intestinal obstruction/partial ileus (a painful obstruction of the intestine) and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). During a review of the Minimum Date Sheet (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care-planning tool) dated November 1, 2021 indicated Resident 69 memory is intact and is alert and oriented. During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with current accepted professional standards in the medication storage room by failing to dispose of two of two expired oral (given by mouth) medications in station 3 medication storage room and insulin being opened past 28 days. These deficient practice resulted in unsafe storage of the medication, the potential to administer altered medication potency and strength to residents and could have resulted in medication errors. Findings: a. During an observation 12/2/21 at 10:30 a.m.in the medication storage room in station 3, it was observed that two medications were expired. The medications were Meclizine and Oyster shell calcium. The dates were 6/21/21 for the Oyster shell vitamin supplement and 7/21/21 for the Meclizine tablets. During an interview on 12/2/21 at 10:55 a.m. with Central Supply (CS) it was stated that CS orders office and medication supplies. CS stated, I order from Twin Med pharmacy on Monday's and they deliver on Tuesday. CS stated, I put the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain dish washer temperature 120 degrees Fahrenheit as outline in the facility policy. This deficient act placed residents at increased risk for food borne illness related to improper sanitation dishes. Findings: During an observation of the kitchen dish washer on 12/3/21 on 08:32am, it was noted that during the wash cycle water temperatures did not exceed 118 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on 12/06/21 at 12:12pm the Dietary Supervisor (DSS) stated that he was unaware why the water temperature did not exceed 118 degrees Fahrenheit as it is checked daily by kitchen staff. DSS stated the dish wash temperature should reach between 120-130 degrees Fahrenheit or higher for proper sanitation. DSS continued, stating that he will alert the maintenance department to repair the issue immediately. A review of facility policy revised October 01, 2014 titled, Dish Machine Temperature Recording, indicated that low temperature washers must maintain a temperature between 120-150 degrees Fahrenheit during both the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a process to identify, track, and evaluate effectiveness of antibiotic administration for four of four residents (Residents 69, 237, 238, and 239) from April 2021 through November 2021. This deficient practice has the potential to increase antibiotic resistance and provide antibiotics without justification in violation of the standard of care. Findings: During an interview on 12/2/21 at 8:00 a.m., the facility RN. Sup1 stated that the forms in the Infection Control binder were all of the tracking that the facility had but were not the forms used by facility Medical Director and DON during their meetings for facility infection surveillance. RN. Sup1 asked the DSD to obtain the computerized summation forms used by the Medical Director and DON for facility antibiotic tracking. DSD printed the Monthly Analysis of Infections Forms from the computer. The section of the Infections Form labeled, number of infections by organism was not completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection control program which prevents the spread of COVID-19 (a respiratory disease caused by a coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2) when Resident 42 were not tested with COVID 19 when he had symptoms consistent with COVID 19. This deficient practice could potentially spread and expose resident and staff with COVID-19. Findings: During a review of the Resident's 42 admission record (Face Sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 42 diagnoses included acute kidney failure (kidneys are not working well), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (not enough oxygen in the blood), partial intestinal obstruction (food is prevented from passing normally through the bowel). During a review of Resident 42 's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 11/30/2021, the MDS indicated Resident 42 had severe impairment in cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that freezer thermometer was working. This deficient practice place residents at increased risk for food borne illness related to improper temperature control of frozen food. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 12/02/21 at 07:57am it was noted that the thermometer in freezer number 5 read 30 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview on 12/02/21 at 08:07am the Dietary Supervisor (DSS) stated that the thermometer was broken and would be removed and replaced immediately. DSS admits the staff utilize the thermometer daily to monitor freezer temperature. DSS stated that staff should have checked and removed thermometer to ensure the integrity of the frozen foods to prevent possible health complication secondary to ingesting food not maintained at appropriate temperatures. A review of facility policy revised November 1, 2014, titled, Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Records indicated Note on the temperature forms the plan of action taken when temperatures are not in acceptable range.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$22,601 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $22,601 — penalty dated 2024-08-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 44% | since 06/01/2010 |
| PINSON, DEVORA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 44% | since 06/28/2012 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| BUTLIG, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/28/2010 |
| WEISS, JONATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555114. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.