Alta Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre
9020 Garfield Street, Riverside, CA 92503 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (951) 688-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.75 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.3%CMS range 37.2–65.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.7%CMS range 5.5–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 78.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 84.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 4.6–13.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.50 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation and monitoring parameters for the antipsychotic medication Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat psychiatric conditions) for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to delay identification of adverse side effects associated with antipsychotic medication use, including changes in condition, excessive sedation, abnormal movements, and falls.Findings: On April 2, 2026, Resident 1's record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included psychosis (a condition or symptom in which a person has difficulty distinguishing what is real from what is not real) and bipolar disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by significant changes in mood, energy, activity level, and ability to function). A review of Resident 1's physician record dated August 14, 2025, indicated the following: - QUEtiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 25 MG…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect new physician recommendations and resident's worsening skin condition for one of one resident reviewed for skin condition (Resident 4).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4's skin rash worsening and not being appropriately addressed. Findings:On August 4, 2025 at 10:05 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 4, Resident 4 stated, he had multiple rashes that were being treated without relief. Resident 4 was observed scratching crusted areas all over the body including the abdomen, both upper and lower extremities, and the facial area.A review of Resident 4's admission Record, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included failure to thrive (a condition characterized by a significant decline in physical and functional status), dementia (forgetfulness), and eczematoid dermatitis (chronic or chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 4) when the facility did not clarify the physician's order for behavior monitoring during the use of an antipsychotic medication (drugs that affect brain chemicals to stabilize mood and thoughts), Vraylar (an antipsychotic medication used to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia). These failures had the potential for Resident 4 to receive Vraylar without adequate target behavior monitoring to assess the effectiveness of the medication. A review of Resident 4's admission Record, dated August 7, 2025, indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels). A review of the Physicians Orders indicated the following antipsychotic medication and behavior monitoring orders for Resident 4:- On May 13, 2025, Vraylor capsule 1.5 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain intravenous (the administration of fluids, medications directly into a vein) access for two of eight residents (Resident 6 and 68) when: 1.Resident 6's PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) dressing was changed in a timely manner.2.Resident 68's peripheral dressing (a transparent covering placed over a peripheral intravenous insertion site) was labeled with the date, time and nurse's initials. These failures had the potential to delay the identification of intravenous catheter-related complications and result in infection, placing the residents at risk for worsened health conditions. Findings:1. On August 4, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., Resident 6 was observed sitting up in bed with a PICC line on the left forearm with a transparent dressing dated July 23, 2025. Resident 6 stated he had been receiving IV antibiotic medications for five weeks. A review of the admission record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of one sampled resident reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 9) the licensed staff document before and after nebulizer assessments as ordered by the physician and evaluate the effectiveness of treatment. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 9 not to receive effective treatment and relief during episodes of respiratory distress. Findings:On August 4, 2025, at 11:11 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 9. Resident 9 was observed coughing and stated she had shortness of breath. Resident 9 stated she had to asked for her breathing treatment and nobody checked her to see if it helped. A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included COPD (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and asthma (chronic respiratory condition characterized by inflamed and narrowed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain assessment and management were performed, for two of four residents reviewed (Resident's 12 and 7). This failure had the potential for Resident's 12 and 7 to experience pain and discomfort which could negatively impact mental and physical well-being. Findings: 1a. On August 5, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 12. Resident 12 was alert, resting in bed, and reported that her pain medication was not as effective as she hoped. Resident 12 stated, she recently had surgery and was receiving pain management interventions with medication and positional changes. On August 6, 2025, A review of Resident 12's record was conducted. Resident 12 was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis which included, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (broken portion of the right leg bone). The History and Physical (H&P), dated December 27, 2024, indicated Resident 12 had the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate intervention was provided after a dialysis (the process of removing excess water and cleaning the blood in people whose kidneys no longer work) treatment for one of three residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident 42) when a post dialysis evaluation was not completed on August 7, 2025.This failure to assess and document Resident 42's health status after dialysis had the potential to result in unrecognized complications and delayed interventions. Findings:A review of Resident 42's Dialysis Communication Record, dated August 7, 2025, indicated the post (after) hemodialysis assessment section was left blank and did not contain documentation that Resident 42 was assessed and monitored after returning to the facility. On August 7, 2025, at 2:24 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse, LVN 1. LVN 1 stated the post hemodialysis assessment was not completed by the dialysis facility and/or assessed by the assigned nurse.On August 7, 2025, at 3:34…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when: 1a. Medication Room in Nursing Station 1 contained one (1) refrigerated medication vial opened without an open date label; and 1b. Medication Cart in Nursing Station 3 contained three (3) medications opened without an open date label.The deficient practices had a potential for residents to receive unsafe and ineffective medications (reduced potency) from being used past their discard (expiration) date and not being removed from active stock.1a. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:09 p.m. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), an inspection of the Medication Room in Nursing Station 1 identified one opened refrigerated multi-dose vial (MDV) of Tuberculin PPD (test agent used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis) 5 TU (test unit) per 0.1 ml (milliliter; unit of measurement) did not have an open date label. The ADON stated nursing staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to hold the medication Furosemide (water pill) for blood pressure less than 110, for one out of three sampled residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in hypotension, placing Resident 1 at risk for medical emergency. Findings. A review of Resident 1's admission recorded indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included localized edema (swelling) and pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries of the lungs). A review of Resident 1's physician order dated January 26, 2025, indicated .Furosemide Oral Tablet 40 MG .Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for edema hold if SBP (systolic blood pressure - measures the pressure in the arteries when the heart beats and pumps blood) is < (less than) 110. A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2025, indicated, Furosemide was administered on February 9,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) user's manual, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) to reflect a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II for 4 (Residents #14, #55, #62, and #80) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings included: During an interview on 05/22/2024 at 9:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the facility did not have a policy on MDS accuracy and stated they followed the RAI manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, revealed All individuals who are admitted to a Medicaid certified nursing facility, regardless of the individual's payment source, must have a Level I PASRR completed to screen for possible mental illness (MI), intellectual disability (ID), developmental disability (DD), or related conditions.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care of a peripheral intravenous (IV) access site was provided and documented in accordance with accepted standards of nursing practice and facility policy for 1 (Resident #55) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for IV site care. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for IV flushes and dressing changes, failed to conduct and document assessments of the IV site, and failed to ensure the IV site was discontinued promptly when not needed for IV therapy. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Organizational Aspects of IV Therapy, effective 07/2013, specified, General Rules of IV Documentation 1. Document per facility policy - usually every shift if resident has an infusion catheter in place, or whenever and infusion treatment is given and 5. The shift note should include the following information: a. Date, time; signature and title of Nurse. b. Location and objective description of insertion site. The policy also indicated Nursing Responsibilities in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure splints were applied as ordered for 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #46) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Program Guidelines, revised 09/19/2019, indicated the restorative nursing program may include, G. Splinting and brace application. The policy also indicated, VII. The RNA [restorative nurse aide] carries out the restorative program according on [sic] the Care Plan. The RNA documents the frequency of the program, the amount of time the resident spent in the activity and their tolerance to the program. In addition, the RNA completes a written weekly summary for all residents on a Restorative Nursing Program. The Restorative Nursing Program Coordinator co-signs the weekly progress note. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility most recently admitted Resident #18 on 02/18/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication order was limited to 14 days unless there was documented rationale for the extended use and a specific duration of the order. This affected 1 (Resident #27) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #27 had a PRN order for Ativan (a benzodiazepine) with no stop date or documented rationale for the continued use. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Behavior/Psychoactive Drug Management, revised 11/2018, specified, Any Psychoactive Medication ordered on a prn basis, must be ordered not to exceed 14 days. If the physician feels the medication needs to be continued, he/she must document the reason(s) for the continued usage and write the order for the medication; not to exceed the 14-day time frame. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #27 on 05/01/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a glucometer (device used to check blood glucose levels) was cleaned and disinfected between use to prevent the potential spread of infection for 2 (Resident #7 and Resident #26) of 4 residents observed receiving blood glucose checks. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Cleaning & [and] Disinfection of Resident Care Equipment, revised 01/01/2012, specified, Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment is cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA [Occupational Safety and Health Administration] Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. The policy also indicated the following: - II. Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents. - VI. Reusable resident care equipment is decontaminated and/or sterilized between residents according to manufacturer's instructions. Observations on 05/22/2024 at 4:12 PM revealed Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents, (Resident 3), was assisted with his meal in a dignified manner when the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2), stood over the resident. This failure caused Resident 3 to feel rushed and had the potential for compromised dignity. Findings: On November 29, 2023, at 11:48 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on a complaint investigation was initiated. On November 29, 2023, at 1:15 p.m., observed Resident 3 sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 3's lunch tray was on the over-bed table in front of Resident 3. CNA 2 was standing beside Resident 3 as he was feeding Resident 3. On November 29, 2023, at 1:34 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated he needed assistance with eating his lunch. Resident 3 stated he felt rushed while CNA 2 was assisting him with lunch. On November 29, 2023, at 1:58 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated that he should have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure basic accommodations of needs were met when one of three residents, (Resident 1) ' s call light was not within reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have unmet needs and unable to call for assistance. Findings: On November 29, 2023, at 11:48 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility on a complaint investigation was initiated. On November 29, 2023, at 12:54 p.m., observed Resident 1 sitting on the right side of his bed in a wheelchair. His over-bed table was in front of him, and his call light was on the left side of the bed on the floor, outside of Resident 1 ' s reach. On November 29, 2023, at 12:54 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated he used his call light to call for assistance. Resident 1 stated he would not be able to reach his call light and was concerned that he could not call for assistance. On November 29, 2023, at 1:19 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the need for duplicated medication (Depakote-medication for seizure and mood stabilizer for behavior management) to manage behavior for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had resulted for Resident 1 to receive two different forms of Depakote for 11 days which could potentially cause drug adverse reaction, complication, and hospitalization. Findings: On August 7, 2023, at 10:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate quality care issues. On August 7, 2023, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. The Physician ' s Order by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, dated 06/27/2023, at 4:54 p.m., indicated an order for, Depakote ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 500 MG (Divalproex Sodium) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER (D/O) BIPOLAR TYPE (mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) MANIFESTED BY (M/B) MOOD SWINGS INFORMED CONSENT (I/C) OBTAINED BY MEDICAL DOCTOR (M/D). The resident ' s record further indicated another order from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent administration of unnecessary medication to one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was administered with Depakote (medication used to treat seizures and bipolar disorder)DR (delayed released -delayed release of drugs in the body) and Depakote ER (extended released-drug is released slowly to provide a prolonged therapeutic effect), at bedtime without adequate indication for duplicated use. The facility failure had resulted in Resident 1 receiving unnecessary medication for 11 days which could potentially cause drug adverse reaction, complications, and unnecessary hospitalization. Findings: On August 7, 2023, at 10:25 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate quality care issues. On August 7, 2023, Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. The Physician ' s Order by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, dated 06/27/2023, at 4:54 p.m., indicated an order for, Depakote ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 500 MG (Divalproex Sodium) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for SCHIZOAFFECTIVE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-23 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for three of five residents reviewed for PASRR (a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care): a. The evaluation for PASRR level II (identifies the specialized services required by the resident) was cooordinated with State-Designated Authority (SDA), for Resident 75. This failure may result to the facility's inability to incorporate PASRR Level II evaluation in the resident's care plan. In addition, Resident 75 specialized services were not met, and b. PASRR level I assessment was coded accurately for Residents 51 and 67. This failure had the potential to result in admitting residents that were not appropriate in the facility and for Residents 51 and 67 not to receive the appropriate services. Findings: a. A review of Resident 75's record, indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 67 and 88) when: 1a. The licensed nurse did not clarify the dose of the medication Roxanol (Morphine: opioid medicine used to treat moderate to severe pain) with the physician for Resident 88. This failure had the potential for Resident 88 to receive the wrong dose of Roxanol; 1b. The intake and output was not monitored as ordered by the physician for Resident 88. This failure had the potential to result in fluid overload. 2. Turning and repositioning was not implemented in accordance to the schedule for Resident 67. This failure had the potential to result in skin breakdown for Resident 67. Findings: 1a. Resident 88's record was reviewed. Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included old cerebrovascular accidents (stroke), ESRD ( End stage renal disease - long standing disease of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services (nursing interventions that promote quality of life by increasing the resident level of strength and mobility and maintain his or her maximum functional capacity) as ordered by the physician for three of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM-the full movement potential of joint) (Residents 19, 52, and 67). This failure had the potential to result in the resident's decline in ROM and deterioration in their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Findings: 1. On July 19, 2021, a review of Resident 19's record indicated that Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), personal history of traumatic fracture (broken bone), and abnormal posture. A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated April 14, 2021, indicated .Section G .Functional Limitation in Range of Motion .Hip, Knee, Ankle, Foot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe food handling practices when: 1. The food products located in the resident's refrigerator were not labeled. 2a. The interior of the microwave oven was observed with dark yellowish substance; and 2b. The convection oven was observed with dust particles and dark brownish material. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses in the highly susceptible resident population. Findings. 1. On July 23, 2021 at 11:12 a.m., during the inspection of the resident's refrigerator in the Yellow zone with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the following were observed: a. One bag filled with multiple sandwiches was found not labeled with names and date; b. One white plastic bag containing food was not labeled with name and date; c. One brown paper bag with a glass container with food inside, was not labeled with name and date. A concurrent interview was conducted with the IP. The IP stated all food in the resident's refrigerator should be labeled with a name and date. The IP stated the bag of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two of eight residents reviewed: 1. An Advance Directive (written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare, recognized under State Law, relating to the provision of healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) was discussed with their responsible party, for Resident 43; and This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive their preplanned treatment and services in the event they were incapacitated and/or unable to speak for themselves. 2. The Advance Directive was in the medical chart and easily accessible to the staff for Resident 51. This failure had the potential for Resident 51's Advance Directive to not be readily retrievable by the staff, by the physician, not knowing the wishes of the resident regarding medical treatment. Findings: 1. Resident 43's record was reviewed. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included cerebrovascular disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse notified the physician of the resident's change of condition for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 88). This failure had the potential for Resident 88 not to receive the appropriate treatment to address his medical needs. Findings: Resident 88's record was reviewed. Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included old cerebrovascular accidents (stroke), ESRD ( End stage renal disease - long standing disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) on hemodialysis (medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the blood), Hepatitis C (infection caused by a virus that attacks the liver and leads to inflammation). Resident 88's record titled, Physician Order, indicated, DNR (instructs health care providers not to do cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] if a patient's breathing stops or if the patient's heart stops beating). SELECTIVE TREATMENT, HOSPITAL TRANSFER ONLY IF COMFORT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address a concern on room temperature during mealtime, for one of sixteen residents observed (Resident 25). This failure had the potential to result in resident not having the quality of life she deserved. Findings: On July 19, 2021, at 12:02 p.m., during dining observation, Resident 25 while waiting for her lunch tray, the resident complained to the staff that she was freezing cold. There was no response from the staff. On July 19, 2021, at 12:18 p.m., Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 3 was observed beside Resident 25. Resident 25 informed RNA 3, the room was cold. On July 19, 2021, at 12:29 p.m., Resident 25 complained to RNA 3, the room was cold. RNA 3 stated this is the coldest room in the facility. On July 19, 2021, at 12:47 p.m., Resident 25 was observed beside Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4. Resident 25 stated it's always this cold. LVN 4 stated the room was cold. On July 19, 2021, at 12:50 p.m., Resident 25 stated she did not like it when the room was cold. LVN 4 stated the cold air was directly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan to address impairment in communication was implemented, when the language communication board was not accessible for the staff to use when providing care for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 62). This failure has the potential for the resident not to be able to effectively communicate his needs to the staff which could result in unmet needs. Findings: On July 19, 2021, at 11 a.m., Resident 62 was observed in the room, with eyes closed, not responsive, to greetings. On July 19, 2021, at 1:08 p.m., in an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, she stated Resident 62 understands only Spanish. She stated the resident responds with gestures. On July 19, 2021, at 3:25 p.m., CNA 1 was observed talking in Spanish to Resident 62. Resident 62 was observed staring at her, with no response. In a review of Resident 62's record, the record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed in accordance with the professional standards of practice, for one of five residents (Resident 2), when Zinc (supplement) was not transcribed correctly and was not administered according to the physicians order for Resident 2. These failures had the potential for residents to experience unmet healthcare needs . Findings: 1. On July 21, 2021, at 10:20 a.m., an observation of medication administration (med pass) was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 for Resident 2. LVN 5 confirmed the order on the medication administration record (MAR) was for Resident 2. LVN 5 administered Zinc 220 mg (a unit of measure) one tab PO (by mouth). On July 21, 2021, at 3:30 p.m., in a concurrent interview and record review with LVN 2, she confirmed the telephone order (TO). LVN 2 stated the over the counter zinc supplement is only stocked in 220 mg. LVN 2 stated the licensed nurses should have called the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazard, when a floor mat on the right side of the bed was not provided in accordance to the plan of care for one of four residents reviewed (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for Resident 19 to sustain injuries from a fall. Findings: On July 19, 2021, at 10:38 a.m., and on July 20, 2021, at 11:35 a.m., Resident 19 was observed lying in bed,with one floor mat on the left side of the bed. There was no floor mat observed on the right side of the bed. A review of Resident 19 record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), personal history of traumatic fracture (broken bone), impulse disorder (condition in which a person has trouble controlling emotions or behaviors). The facility document titled, Morse Fall Risk Assessment, dated April 16, 2021, indicated, .Resident is High Risk. Implement high risk fall prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed address the pharmacy recommendation on Ativan (lorazepam- used to treat anxiety) use, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 4). This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to receive Ativan unnecessarily. In addition, Resident 4 was not reevaluated by the physician prior to continuing the use of Ativan. Findings: A review of Resident 4's record indicated, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included depression, and anxiety disorder (feeling of worry, nervousness). Resident 4's history and physical examination, dated January 2, 2021, indicated she has the capacity to understand and make decisions. Resident 4s Pharmacist recommendation April 5, 2021, indicated Ativan (Lorazepam) 0.5 mg Daily PRN (date ordered- 3/16/2021) Suggest discontinue the current order for PRN anxiolytic (anti-anxiety drugs). PRN anxiolytics should be initially ordered up to 14 days only. After 14 days, the order should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired and outdated medications were not stored and readily available for use. This failure could expose residents to expired medications with questionable potency and efficacy. Findings. On July 21, 2021, at 11:15 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, during a medication storage inspection in the designated yellow zone. One unopened box labeled; Geri-care Ear drops (carbamide peroxide 6.5% Ear wax removal solution) with expiration date of June 21, 2021, was observed stored in the top shelf of the medication storage cabinet. On July 21, 2021, at 11:20 a.m., LVN 2 stated the Geri-care Ear drops for ear wax removal should not have been in the cabinet past the expiration date. LVN 2 stated the medication was expired and should be disposed of according to the standards of the facility. On July 22, 2021, at 4:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated if any medication is noticed to be expired it would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for two of 18 residents reviewed (Residents 49 and 79), the following: a. The routine A1C (blood test that measures blood sugar level over the past three months), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel blood test often used to evaluate liver function, kidney function, and nutrient levels) and lipid panel (the amount of specific fat molecules called lipids in the blood) was obtained, as ordered by the physician for Resident 49. This failure resulted for the routine laboratory to not be completed as ordered which could result in the delay in Resident 49's care and treatment; and b. The urine analysis was reported to the physician promptly for Resident 79. This failure had the potential to result in the delay of care and treatment for Resident 79 medical condition. Findings: a. A review of Resident 49's record indicated Resident 49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (condition that affects…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide specialized rehabilitative (rehab) services, as ordered by the physician, for one of two residents reviewed for rehab (Resident 59), when PT and OT did not evaluate and treat Resident 59. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 59's difficulty in attaining and maintaining her highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being. Findings: On July 19, 2021, at 4:17 p.m., Resident 59 was observed in bed. In a concurrent interview, Resident 59 stated she was admitted to the facility for neuropathy (a disease that causes weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet), and was supposed to get rehab services (PT and OT). Resident 59 stated she did not receive PT and OT evaluation and treatment. Resident 59's record was reviewed. Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: dry beriberi (a disease that causes neuropathy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of 18 residents reviewed (Resident 79), an adequate indication for the use of Macrobid (antibiotic to treat urinary tract infection ) . This failure had the potential to result in emergence of antibiotic resistant organisms. Findings: Resident 79's record was reviewed. Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar level). Resident 79's document titled, Laboratory Report, dated July 14, 2021, indicated .UA (urine analysis) C.S (culture sensitivity) IF IND (if indicated) .CULTURE, URINE .Final .<10,000 cfu/ml (colony forming unit per milliliter) . No sensitivities required .Abnormal Summary .CHARACTER .slightly-Cloudy .PROTEIN .100 .GLUCOSE .>=500 .LEUKOESTERASE (presence of white blood cells in the urine) .Trace .WBC (white blood cells) .8 .BACTERIA .Small .MUCUS .Few . Resident 79's progress notes dated July 19, 2021, indicated, Received U/A result…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for two of five residents reviewed: a. Education was provided to Resident 65 when the resident refused the influenza vaccine. This failure did not honor the resident right to be notified in order to make an informed choice for Resident 65 regarding the vaccine. b. Education was provided to the resident's responsible party about pneumococcal vaccine (prevents infection by Streptococcus [bacterium that causes one of the most common and severe forms of pneumonia] [pneumonia-lung inflammation]), benefits and potential side effects. This failure did not honor the responsible party's right to be notified in order to make an informed choice for Resident 75 regarding the vaccine. Findings: a. A review of Resident 65's record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (ESRD- inability of the kidney to make urine and remove waste from the blood) and heart failure (chronic, progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-23 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the request for COVID 19 (Corona virus disease 2019- a respiratory disease caused by a virus that can be transmitted from person to person) vaccine for one of five residents reviewed for immunization for COVID 19 (Resident 78). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 78 not getting the protection from the virus. Findings: On July 19, 2021, at 8:56 a.m., during an interview with Resident 78, she stated she had a flu like symptom in the past that is why she requested to have the vaccine in the facility. Resident 78 requested the COVID 19 vaccine from the facility a month ago and she did not received it yet. During a review of Resident 78's record, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, fracture of the right tibia (larger bone of the leg) and post motor vehicular accident. Resident 78's history and physical exam dated June 19, 2021, indicated she was alert, and cooperative. On July 19, 2021, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CITRUS WELLNESS CENTRE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 72% | since 10/01/2009 |
| BR OCEANGATE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2009 |
| KATZ KINDRED HEALTHCARE PARTNERSHIP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2009 |
| KINDRED REALTY PARTNERSHIP | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2009 |
| MAJER, SOL | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2009 |
| WEISS, JONATHAN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2009 |
| ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/17/2025 |
| RECHNITZ, SHLOMO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SCOTT, ANDREW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/04/2020 |
| SHAROBIEM, ANDRO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| ERETZ ALTA VISTA PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2009 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055042. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.