University Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the Speech Therapist's ST - a speech language pathologist who assess and treat people who have speech, language, voice and swallowing disorders) recommendation was followed for 1 (one) of 9 (nine) residents (Resident 22), since June 27, 2025.This failure had the potential to place Resident 22's health at risk and to miss identifying any undetected disease.During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated, Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), moderate protein calorie malnutrition (poor intake leading to weight loss or weakness) and dementia (a group of diseases and illnesses that affect thinking, memory, reasoning, personality, mood and behavior). During a concurrent observation and interview on November 17, 2025, at 9:42 AM, with Resident 22, inside her room, Resident 22 was awake. Resident 22 reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for RNA (Restorative Nursing Assistant, staff trained to help residents maintain or improve function) to perform AAROM ( active - assisted range of motion) was implemented for one (1) of nine (9) sampled residents (Resident 4) when there was no documented evidence that the AAROM was provided to Resident 4, since October 17, 2025.This failure placed Resident 4 at risk for functional decline due to the inability to verify that restorative nursing services were implemented as ordered.During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated, Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of dementia (a group of diseases and illnesses that affect thinking, memory, reasoning, personality, mood and behavior), fracture of the lower end right radius (broken wrist bone that is healing but still requires exercises to restore movement and prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to its safety and supervision of resident ' s policy when one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1) left the facility without the staff ' s knowledge. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping for a duration of approximately 6 hours and traveling a distance of about 17 miles away from the facility, posing a potential safety risk to the clinically compromised resident (Resident 1). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included unspecified dementia (a general term for a group of symptoms that affect a person ' s ability to think, remember, and reason, and can interfere with their daily life), Alzheimer ' s disease (a general term for memory loss and other cognitive abilities serious enough to interfere with daily life). During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1 ' s…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (Resident 41 and Resident #45) of 13 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to code Resident #41 received hospice care and Resident #45 received an antidepressant medication. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, indicated, 2. Any person who completes any portion of the MDS assessment, tracking form, or correction request form is required to sign the assessment certifying the accuracy of that portion of that assessment. 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #41 on 12/10/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. Resident #41's Order Summary Report, for active orders as of 07/01/2024, indicated an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) evaluation was completed when a resident received a new mental diagnosis for 1 (Resident #18) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASARRs. Findings included: A typed document from the California Department of Health Care Services, dated 09/09/2023, specified Per Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations sections 483.100 through 483.138, individuals identified with a SMI [serious mental illness] and/or ID/DD/RD [intellectual disability/developmentally disability/related condition] must be screened and evaluated to determine whether SNF [skilled nursing facility] level of care and specialized services in the least restrictive setting that best meets their needs are required. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #18 on 03/18/2022. According to the admission Record, on 04/06/2022, the resident received diagnoses of anxiety disorder, depression, and schizoaffective disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) evaluation was completed for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for PASARRs. Findings included: A typed document from the California Department of Health Care Services, dated 09/09/2023, specified Per Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations sections 483.100 through 483.138, individuals identified with a SMI [serious mental illness] and/or ID/DD/RD [intellectual disability/developmentally disability/related condition] must be screened and evaluated to determine whether SNF [skilled nursing facility] level of care and specialized services in the least restrictive setting that best meets their needs are required. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 10/18/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified psychosis, and suicidal ideation. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen, when there where dead insects and cobwebs under the shelves in the dry storage and behind the stove. This had the potential to contaminate the food and food contact surfaces in a highly susceptible population of 43 residents. Findings: During an observation and interview on January 18, 2022, at 8:05 AM, under the shelf in the dry storage room on the east wall, there was cobwebs. Under the shelf on the west wall, there were dead insects on the floor under the shelf. The Dietary Supervisor stated the floors should be clean. During an observation on January 18, 2022, at 8:16 AM, there were cobwebs behind the stove and some debris on the floor under the stove. During a review of the FDA Federal Food Code 2017, 6-501.111 Controlling Pests, states: Insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. Effective measures must be taken to eliminate their presence in food establishments. And 6-501.112 Removing Dead or Trapped…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-24 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - facility assessment tool), for three of three residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident 5, 18, and 27) when: 1. One of Resident 5's active diagnoses was not coded. 2. Resident 18's Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet (medication that prevents blood cells from sticking together forming a clot) was coded as an anticoagulant (medication that prevents the formation of blood clots) in Resident 18's MDS, dated [DATE]. 3. Resident 27's Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet was coded as anticoagulant in Resident 27's MDS, dated [DATE]. These failures had the potential to result in unmet care needs for Resident 5, 18, and 27 which can negatively affect their health and safety. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-01-24 · tag F0646 — pattern
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal requirement to help ensure individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were re-evaluated after a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA- a comprehensive Minimum Data Set [MDS- a facility assessment tool] assessment done for resident that must be completed when a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either improvement or decline), for three of three residents reviewed for PASRR (Residents 9, 18, and 33). These failures had the potential for Residents 9, 18, and 33 not to receive the care and services most appropriate for their needs. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 9's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized comprehensive care plan (specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) was initiated, for one resident reviewed for mood/behavior (Resident 5) when a care plan was not initiated for Resident 5's diagnosis of depression and use of anti-depressant medication in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to cause inadequate management of Resident 5's medical condition, affecting Resident 5's health and safety. Findings: A review of Resident 5's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A review of Resident 5's Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROCKWELL HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $322K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA