Yucaipa Hills Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 21.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY An immediate jeopardy (IJ- a situation that has threatened or is likely to threaten the health and safety of a resident) was called under F689 §483.25(d)(2) Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents on October 16, 2024, at 4:53 PM, regarding the elopement of Resident 27 from the facility on October 16, 2024. An IJ was called in the presence of the Administrator. A corrective action plan was requested on October 16, 2024, at 4:53 PM. The immediate Jeopardy was removed after the corrective action plan was verified to be implemented through observations interviews, and record reviews on October 17, 2024, at 2:46 PM in the presence of the Administrator. Free of Accident Hazards / Supervision/Devices CFR (s): 483.25(d)(2)(2) §483.25 (d) Accidents. The facility must ensure that. §483.25(d)(1) The resident environment remains as free of accidents hazards as is possible; and §483.25(d)(2) Each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one on one (1:1) supervision (direct one on one monitoring of a resident by a staff member) was implemented for one of 80 residents (Resident 1) as ordered by a physician on April 13, 2023 when Resident 1 was found on the floor of his room with his door closed and unaccompanied by staff with a laceration (a cut or skin wound) injury to his head after he sustained an unwitnessed fall. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a head injury which required treatment and evaluation in a hospital. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diffuse traumatic brain injury (head injury), dementia (a brain disease that causes memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning), unsteadiness on feet, epilepsy (a brain disorder that causes recurring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two crash carts (a wheeled cart carrying emergency equipment and medications for use in case of emergency) were checked and documented daily by staff as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Emergency Medical supplies and equipment when the crash cart in the upper unit (CCUU) was not checked and documented. This failure had the potential to cause delay in availability and functionality of emergency equipment and medications in case of an emergency which will impact the health and safety of all residents in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on January 7,2026, at 11:00 AM, with Infection Preventionist nurse (IP), the facility's crash cart in the upper unit (CCUU) was checked and observed to have missing signatures for the following dates:July 1, 2025, through July 31, 2025 (31 days on night shift were missing signatures)August 6, 2025, and August 7, 2025 (2 days on night shift were missing signatures)August 15, 2025 (PM shift was missing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for Foods brought by family/visitors when one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 47) reviewed for nutrition received food from a visitor of another resident. This failure had the potential to compromise dietary compliance and risk Resident 47's health and nutritional needsFindings:During an observation on January 7, 2026, at 12:45 PM, in activity/dining room, Resident 47 was sitting on table one with other residents . One of the resident's (Resident 19) wife (not a resident in the facility/visitor) brought snacks including potato chips, marshmallows, a packet of hot [NAME] powder (a package of powder which contains chocolate and sugar and can be mixed with water or milk to make hot chocolate) were handed by the visitor to Resident 47. Resident 47 opened the packet and put some powder on his desert, and swallowed the remaining powder directly. It was also observed that the visitor was offering potato…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Oxygen Administration, for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 7) when oxygen was not administered according to the physician's order. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 7's respiratory status which would risk resident 7's health and well-being.Findings:During a concurrent observation, and interview, on January 6, 2026,at 10:26 AM, with Infection Preventionist Nurse(IP) in Resident 7's room, Resident 7 was lying on bed with eyes closed. Resident 7 had nasal canula (a clear plastic tube through which the oxygen is delivered to the nostrils) which was connected to oxygen on her face but the nose piece (the opening where the oxygen is delivered to the patient) was away from Resident 7's nostrils. The IP stated, the oxygen was not on Resident 7's nose and she might have pulled that out. The IP acknowledged that nurses are responsible for checking the placement and delivery of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when there was visible accumulation of grime and debris within an actively used oven and the continued presence of a non-functional refrigerator in the food preparation area. This failure had the potential to result in accumulating pathogenic microorganisms (germs or infectious agents that can cause disease) and to attract insects or rodents, which could place the health and safety of 81 highly vulnerable residents who receive food from the kitchen at risk.Findings:During a concurrent observation on January 5, 2026, at 7:57 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. A non-functional refrigerator, labeled out of order was observed in the kitchen food preparation area. The DS stated, the refrigerator had been non-operational for approximately two weeks and was not being used. The refrigerator continued to take up space in the kitchen and had not been relocated to another area.During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control practices for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 6) when an indwelling urinary catheter (Foley-a tube that stays inside the bladder to drain the urine into a bag) drainage bag was observed resting on the floor.This failure had the potential to promote the transmission of infection by allowing contamination of the urinary catheter drainage system and increasing the risk of urinary tract infection. Findings: A review of Resident 6's face sheet (FS- a document with resident demographics, brief medical history, and emergency contacts), the FS indicated, Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in the bladder or urinary system that can cause pain, burning, frequent urination, fever or confusion), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the nerves and muscles that control the bladder do not work properly, making it difficult to urinate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prevention of avoidable accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1, a resident who was at high risk for falls and fully dependent upon staff for mobility while in bed, fell from his bed while being changed by Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 to sustain a head injury which included a bleeding laceration to his right eyebrow and a subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between your brain and the thin tissues that cover and protect it). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (neurological disorder that causes permanent problems with movement, balance, and posture), parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), disorders of bone density and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a facility assessment tool that consists of the resident assessment instrument (RAI) and the care area assessment (CAA) was conducted and submitted to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in accordance with federal submission timeframes, for thirteen of thirteen residents (Residents 54, 55, 15, 27, 35, 40, 47, 49, 51, 62, 63, 66, and 76) reviewed for residents' assessment. These failures resulted in inadequate monitoring of progress or decline for Residents 54, 55, 15, 27, 35, 40, 47, 49, 51, 62, 63, 66, and 76 and the lack of resident specific information to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), psychosis (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eighteen residents (Resident 36) reviewed for advanced directives had a Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - written medical orders that addresses a limited number of critical medical decisions) accurately completed when there was conflicting information documented regarding medical interventions. This failure had the potential for Resident 36 to receive end of life care not in accordance with their wishes and for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the resident wanted. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record indicated Resident 36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) affecting left non-dominant side, heart failure, chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that prevents the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse to the required parties and in the timelines specified by the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and as required by federal regulations. This failure resulted in an allegation of abuse to not be reported and subsequently investigated which had the potential to place Residents 36 at risk for ongoing abuse or mistreatment due to a delay in the reporting and investigation of the alleged incident. Findings: A review of Resident 36's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), indicated Resident 36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) affecting left non-dominant side, heart failure, major depressive disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and anxiety disorder (a condition that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents 14 and 11) received care and services as specified In their care plans (individualized plans for the medical care of a resident) when: 1) For Resident 14, the facility did not ensure staff kept the resident's smoking materials. This failure had the potential to result in in accident or injury to Resident 14 and other residents residing in the facility as a result of increased fire hazard. 2) For Resident 11, the facility did not ensure staff checked the residents blood sugar before meals. This failure has the potential to affect Resident 11's blood sugar management and could lead to inaccurate blood sugar readings, which may result improper insulin administration (medication use in the treatment and management of diabetes) and increased risk of hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar). Findings: 1) During a review of Resident 14's clinical record, the admission Record (contains medical and demographic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,899 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $22,932 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
• $8,967 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-15 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROCKWELL HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $687K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA