No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Creekside Post Acute

35253 Avenue H, Yucaipa, CA 92399 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (909) 795-2476 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (909) 795-2476 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 32 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13391 California St # 1 · (909) 795-9747 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12350 California St · (909) 797-9193 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
34078 County Line Rd · (909) 795-9208 · Call to confirm hours
Park
960 4th St · (909) 795-9801 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
34968 Avenue H · (909) 795-2558

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.4%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers13.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.4%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.9%93.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.6%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%11.2%12.0%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.32hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
2.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
6.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
55.6%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.55 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-18)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 fell out of bed during wound care treatment. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling off the bed, placing his safety at risk.During a review of Resident 1's admission Records (general demographics information), the admission Records indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (partial or total loss of sensory or motor function), respiratory failure (lungs cannot supply oxygen), type 2 diabetes mellitus (body has trouble controlling blood sugar) and pressure ulcer on the left hip (wound to hip).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Seta (MDS - clinical assessment tool used in nursing homes that serves as a comprehensive summary of a resident's functional capabilities, health conditions, and care needs.) Section GG Functional Abilities, dated March 25, 2026, the MDS Section GG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their Medication Administration policy and procedure for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's scheduled dose for 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM medications were not recorded as administered on Resident 1's Medical Administration Record (MAR) on December 31, 2025. This failure has the potential for Resident 1 to be at risk of overdose or missed doses.Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF- a serious lung disease where the lungs scar and stiffen, making it hard to breathe), and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lungs aren't doing their job well enough to keep your body supplied with oxygen and clear out waster (Carbon dioxide)). A review of Resident 1's MAR for the month of December 2025 indicated multiple scheduled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not receive his medication, Pirfenidone (a medication for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF- a serious lung disease where the lungs scar and stiffen, making it hard to breathe), on three occasions, December 26, 2025 at 2:00 PM, December 27, 2025, at 2:00 PM, and December 28, 2025, at 10:00 PM. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for adverse effect such as a return or worsening of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) symptoms, which includes shortness of breath, extreme tiredness, and dry hacking cough.Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included IPF, and chronic respiratory failure (long-term condition where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff who had appropriate competencies and skill set completed the resident's Quarterly Nutrition Assessment (a detailed evaluation of eating habits, weight and overall health related to food, done every 3 months). This failure had the potential to place 52 highly vulnerable residents' health at risk due to not receiving an adequate nutritional assessment.During a review of Residents 5, 8, 25 and 26's Quarterly Nutrition Assessments (comprehensive evaluation of an individual's nutritional status, aiming to identify any nutritional deficiencies or risks, and guide personalized interventions) between November 2024, through June 2025, it indicated the assessments were completed and signed by the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS 1).During a review of Resident 8, 25 and 26's Quarterly Nutrition Assessments between November 2024, through June 2025, it indicated the assessments were completed and signed by DSS 2.During an interview on July 17, 2025, at 10:00 AM with DSS 1, DSS 1 verified that the completion of the quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store resident food safely when:1.The resident refrigerator had multiple food items that were not labeled or dated. 2. The temperature of the refrigerator had not been monitored in June 2025 and July 2025. These failures had the potential for food borne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) in 25 medically compromised residents who were able to store food in this refrigerator.During a concurrent observation and interview on July 16, 2025, at 9:57 AM, with the Social Worker (SW), in the dining room, the resident refrigerator was found to have multiple food items that were not labeled or dated. Two thermometers were located outside of the fridge. The SW stated the food items stored in the refrigerator should be dated and labeled with the resident's name.During a concurrent interview and record review on July 16, 2025, at 11:00 AM, with the SW, the temperature logs for the resident refrigerator were reviewed. The SW stated there were no temperatures logged for the months of June…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the acceptable parameters of nutritional status (factors that reflect that an individual's nutritional status is adequate, relative to his/her overall condition and prognosis, such as weight, food/fluid intake, and pertinent laboratory values), recognize, evaluate, and address the nutritional needs of one of three residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 26) when: 1. Resident 26's tube feeding (method of providing nutrition directly into the stomach or small intestine when a person is unable to eat enough or at all by mouth) formula was administered as ordered by the physician on July 15, 2025, and July 16, 2025. Resident 26's had an order to receive 95 ml (milliliters, a unit of volume) per hour. On July 15, 2025, at 3:52pm Resident 26 only received 500 ml of formula for 9 hours, but should have received 855 ml (a difference of 355 ml). On July 16, 2025, at 3:32 PM, Resident 26 received 380 ml for 8 hours, of feeding but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used were labeled in accordance with professional standards, and storage of medications were properly secured for two of 11 medication carts (Med Cart - used to transport medication to resident's rooms) when: 1. Two bubble packs (small package enclosing goods in transparent dome-shaped plastic on a flat cardboard backing) containing Resident 18's Eliquis (a medication used for blood thinner) were found without expiration dates. This failure had the potential to cause the medication to lose its potential effects and be used for Resident 18. 2. Eight tubes of Santyl (a medication used for wounds) ointment were found without resident's identification labels. This failure had the potential to be accessed and administered in error. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) left Med Cart 4-1 unlocked and unattended for ten minutes. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of unauthorized access, misuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence staff discussed with two of seven residents (Resident 7 and 54) whether the residents had an existing advance directive (a legal document that explains how an individual wants medical decisions to be made if the individual is incapable of making their own decisions) and were educated on their rights to establish a new advance directive if desired.This failure had the potential for Residents 7 and 54 to receive end of life care not in accordance with their wishes and for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the residents (or their representatives) wanted.1. A review of Resident 7’s “admission Record” (contains medical and demographic information) indicated Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood, leading to dangerously low levels of oxygen in the body), cirrhosis of liver (a condition where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Assessment was accurately completed to reflect the resident's status, care, and services for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for MDS, when Resident 2's schizophrenia diagnosis (a chronic and severe mental health disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) was not accurately coded on Resident 2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (a standardized, federally mandated evaluation of nursing home residents' health status, conducted every three months or more frequently if there's a significant change in condition) assessment. This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Resident 2's care and support needs.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was re-submitted for one of five sampled residents reviewed for PASARR Assessment (Resident 2).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 not being accurately assessed regarding supplemental treatment and services to better meet the needs of the resident.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), it indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia, respiratory failure (when the lungs cannot adequately oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide, leading to hypoxia (low oxygen) and/or hypercapnia (high carbon dioxide), and hypothyroidism (when the thyroid gland doesn't make and release enough hormone into your bloodstream). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue resulting from pressure on the skin) received care for skin breakdown as specified in the resident's care plan (an individualized plan for the medical care of a resident) and physician's orders when there was no documented evidence to indicate Resident 4 received physician ordered wound care treatment for multiple days in May, June, and July 2025.This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to experience worsening pressure ulcer wounds and delayed wound healing.A review of Resident 4's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), indicated Resident 4 was initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy (a neurological disorder that affects movement, posture, and muscle tone), multiple sclerosis (a condition that affects your brain and spinal cord [central nervous system]), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 43) reviewed for environment/accidents was free from accident hazards when Resident 43 fell from bed while receiving care from a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on April 22, 2025.This failure may have contributed to Resident 43 to experience uncontrolled pain in the resident's coccyx area (often referred to as the tailbone, a small bone at the base of the spine) which resulted in the resident needing treatment and evaluation at a hospital.A review of Resident 43's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis of vertebra (infection of the spine), dependence on respirator [ventilator] (ventilator- a machine which helps a person to breathe) status (refers to a patience reliance on a mechanical ventilator to breathe due to impaired lung function).During a review of Resident 43's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their manual resuscitation (process of assisting or taking over a patient's breathing using a handheld device) policy was implemented for one of three residents (Resident 4) reviewed for respiratory care, when Resident 4 did not have an Artificial Manual Breathing Unit bag (AMBU bag - a hand-held medical device used to provide respiratory support to patients who are not breathing or are having difficulty breathing. Also known as a bag-valve-mask (BVM) or a manual resuscitator) at the bedside.This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to receive delayed emergency resuscitative measures during an emergency as a result of not having the required medical equipment immediately available.A review of Resident 4's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information) indicated Resident 4 was initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the lungs cannot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the documentation in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) was accurate for one of four residents (Resident 4) reviewed for advance directives (a legal document that outlines a person's healthcare wishes in the event that they become unable to make medical decisions for themselves due to illness, injury, or incapacity) when Resident 4's code status (refers to a patient's preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] and other life-sustaining measures in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) contradictorily indicated Resident 4 was both Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - a medical order that instructs healthcare providers not to perform CPR if a patient's heart stops or breathing ceases) and Full-Code (indicates a patient's wish to receive all possible medical interventions, including CPR in the event the heart stops or breathing ceases).This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to receive end of life care not in accordance with their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff follow the Infection Control Policies and Procedure 's standards for Transmission-Based Precautions (actions implemented in addition to standard precautions that are based upon the means of transmission in order to prevent or control infections) when a staff member was observed entering a Contact Precaution (measures that are intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment) room without wearing the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE- protective items or garments worn to protect the body or clothing from hazards that can cause injury and to protect residents from cross-transmission.). This failure had the potential to place all residents, visitors, and staff at risk of being exposed to a contagious disease (illness caused by the spread of germs) that could compromise their health.Findings: During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and management of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube- tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach that delivers nutrition, hydration, and medications) was implemented in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for three of six residents (Residents 18, 19, and 6) reviewed for g-tube when a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) did not check Residents 18, 19, and 6's G-tube placement (listening to gurgling sound when flushing air through the g-tube to confirm for correct position) before administering medications. These failures had the potential to place Residents 18, 19, and 6 at increased risk of aspiration (when food or liquids enter the lungs). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications being received by the residents were explained prior to administration to three of eight residents (Residents 18, 19, and 6) reviewed for medication administration. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 18, 19, and 6 being denied their right to know what medication is being given and breaking one of the seven rights of medication administration. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where there is not enough oxygen in the body), other seizures (sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in brain), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that obstructs airflow). An observation of medication administration for Resident 18 by LVN 2 was June 4,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure storage of medications was secure for one of one medication room, when the medication refrigerator inside the medication room was found unlocked. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, and/or harm to highly vulnerable population of 49 residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on June 3, 2024, at 10:24 AM, with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the medication room was inspected. The medication refrigerator was unlocked. The IP acknowledged the finding and stated the refrigerator needs to be locked when not in use. During a concurrent interview and record review, on June 4, 2024, at 9:24 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON reviewed and acknowledged the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P), titled Policy and Procedure for Med Pass, and stated that based on the P&P for medication storage the medication refrigerator should also always be locked. During a review of the facility's undated policy and procedure (P&P),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the Restorative Nursing [nursing interventions that promote the residents' ability to adapt and adjust] Weekly Summary for one of six residents (Resident 6) reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint.). This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate progress or regression in range of motion exercises which could negatively impact the range of motion for Resident 6. Findings: During an observation on June 3, 2024, at 11:16 AM, in Resident 6's room, Resident 6 was laying down in bed with a stuffed plush carrot toy in his right hand and splint (strip of rigid material used for supporting a bone) on the left hand. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information, it indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of anoxic brain damage (complete lack of oxygen to the brain causing death of brain cells), cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 2) call light remained within reach and accessible for a distressed resident (Resident 2) while in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 2 ' s needs not being met in a timely manner and deprived this mentally compromised resident of assistance when needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Anxiety, Depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder (mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood, and behavior) and palliative care (relieving the symptoms of an incurable medical condition using comfort measures). During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 2, on February 15, 2024, at 12:07 PM, Resident 2 is observed shaking, crying, and wearing a sweatshirt with sweatpants. Resident 2 states, I need to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three medications were administered to the appropriate resident for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's respiratory function and overall health and safety. Finding: An abbreviated survey was conducted on August 4, 2023, at 11:20 AM to investigate a complaint related to quality of care. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses, which included Myocardial Infarction (Heart attack), Cerebral Vascular Accident (an interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain). During review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the Incident Note dated July 30, 2023, at 2:08 pm by the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated, Notified by RN regarding administering another residents' medications (Hydromorphone 4mg (a powerful pain killer), Cymbalta 60mg (used for treatment of depression and anxiety), and baclofen 20mg (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent entry of outside contaminants into the bulk container of thickener (a starch added to liquids and foods to make it firmer). This failure had the potential to cause contamination of food prepared with thickener, and possible foodborne illness in 47 of 48 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 14, 2022, at 8:26 AM, with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), in the kitchen, the bulk container of thickener had multiple dark crumbs mixed in with the white thickener. The DSS stated that the thickener should not be like that. During a review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Federal Food Code 2017, 3-701.11 indicates A food that is unsafe, adulterated, or not honestly presented . shall be discarded or reconditioned according to an approved procedure. In addition, 3-201.11 indicates, it is also critical to monitor food products to ensure that, after harvesting and processing, they do not fall victim…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-03-17 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not properly dispose of trash when the outside garbage bin for trash was overflowing, and the lid was not closed for one of one dumpster. This failure had the potential to attract vermin (pests or nuisance animals that spread diseases) in a facility that cares for 48 medically compromised residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 14, 2022, at 10:43 AM, with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), in the outdoor garbage storage area, the trash dumpster was overflowing with garbage, and the lids were not closed. The DSS stated that the trash should not be overflowing, and the lids should be closed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Sanitation: Garbage and Trash, dated 2018, indicated, Garbage and trash cans must be inspected daily that no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their daily menu for lunch on March 15, 2022, by substituting the penne pasta with mashed potatoes for three of three puree (food is blended until it is a thick, smooth, lump-free consistency) lunch trays. Puree mashed potatoes were also served according to the menu on March 14, 2022. This failure had the potential for residents to lose their appetite because they were served the same starch two times in a row, which could compromise the nutritional status of three of three residents (Residents 6, 11, and 28) who are medically compromised. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 15, 2022, at 1:10 PM, with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), in the hallway directly outside of the kitchen, the lunch test trays for the regular and puree diet were observed to have two different food items. The regular lunch tray had penne pasta and the puree tray had mashed potatoes. The DSS stated the cook should follow the menu and the spreadsheet for the regular and puree diet. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper consistency of the spinach served on the puree (food is blended until it is a thick, smooth, lump-free consistency) lunch trays for three of three residents (Residents 6, 11, 28). This failure had the potential to cause difficulties in swallowing and possible aspiration (when something swallowed enters the airway or lungs) in these medically compromised residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on March 15, 2022, at 10:55 AM, with Kitchen Aide (KA), in the kitchen, the KA was observed preparing pureed meatballs for lunch. She stated the pureed should be the consistency of ice cream or mashed potatoes. During a concurrent observation and interview on March 15, 2022, at 1:10 PM, with the Dietetic Services Supervisor (DSS), in the hallway directly outside the kitchen, the spinach on the puree lunch test tray was watery in consistency and spread out on the plate. The DSS stated that it should not be like that, it should be thicker. During a review of a facility document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of a Coronavirus, COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory infection) when, three nursing staff were observed not following proper personal protective equipment, PPE (equipment and cloths for protection against infectious diseases) guidelines when entering rooms in yellow zone (Residents under isolation observation for suspected COVID-19). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection to 48 medically compromised residents. Findings: During an observation on March 14, 2022, at 10:35 AM, in room102, an isolation room, a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) was entering a room without wearing an N-95 respirator. During an observation on March 14, 2022, at 11:00 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], a resident in the yellow zone,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program (an effort to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by physicians and used by residents) when Resident 29 was prescribed antibiotics and there were no criteria used to ensure that they had been prescribed appropriately. This failure had a potential to ineffectively treat infections, protect patients from harm caused by unnecessary antibiotic use and combat antibiotic resistance, for one resident reviewed for antibiotics. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's medication orders, it was noted that he had been prescribed Keflex (a medication used for infections) 500 mg (mg-unit of measurement) twice a day. There was no evidence that he had been screened and met criteria for antibiotic use per the facility policy. During an interview on March 16, 2022, at 9:47 AM, with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), she stated the physician orders antibiotics, but I don't know what an antibiotic stewardship program is. During an interview on March 17, 2022, at 1:20 PM, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the rights and dignity of one resident (Resident 15) reviewed for urinary catheter, when Resident 15's urinary catheter bag (a hollow, flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) was not covered with a dignity bag and was visible to public view. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 15's dignity and violate his right to privacy. Findings: During an observation in Resident 15's room, on March 15, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Resident 15 was lying in bed in a semi upright position. Resident 15's urinary catheter bag was hanging on the right side of the bed. It was not covered with a dignity bag and was visible to public view. During a follow up observation and concurrent interview with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), on March 16, 2022, at 1:46 PM, in Resident 15's room, Resident 15's urinary catheter bag was hanging on the right side of the bed, uncovered and was visible to public…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident care assessment tool) for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 17 and 42). These failures had the potential to result in unmet care needs for Residents 17 and 42, which could adversely affect their safety and health. Findings: 1. During an observation on March 16, 2022, at 6:51 AM, at Resident 17's room, Resident 17 was lying in bed in an upright position, watching television. During a review of Resident 17's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included liver cirrhosis (late-stage liver disease in which healthy liver tissue is replaced with scar tissue and the liver is permanently damaged), and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interferes with one's daily activities).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations for one of four residents sampled (Resident 11) when she lost 5 pounds each month since her admission date of December 29, 2021. The RD recommended that nursing document how many milliliters (mL) of a nutritional supplement (Resource 2.0) the resident consumed and for Resident 11 to be seen by a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) for evaluation. This failure had the potential to cause further impaired nutrition and weight loss in Resident 11 who is medically compromised. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, it indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia following cerebral infarction (difficulty swallowing after suffering an illness in which part of the brain loses its blood supply). During a review of Resident 11's Weights and Vitals Summary, dated March 16, 2022, indicated Resident 11 weighed: 155 pounds on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotics (government controlled medication due to its addictive nature) used to relieve pain was signed on the resident's electronic medication administration record (E-MAR) as given for one of eighteen sampled resident (Resident 33). This failure had the potential for drug diversion, theft, and loss of the controlled medication that could affect the health and safety of Resident 33. Findings: During the review of Resident 33's Face Sheet, (which contains resident demographic and medical information) indicated, the resident was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of Paraplegia (the loss of ability to move parts of the body), anxiety (mental health disorder, feelings of worrying), and muscle spasm. During a review of Resident 33's physician orders, dated, March 2022, indicated Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10/325 mg (narcotic pain medication), give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for severe pain. During a review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication was secured to be administered per the facility policy, when Silvadene Cream® (a topical medication used commonly on wounds to prevent and treat infections) was left unattended on the bedside table of one out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 12). This had the potential to cause harm due to medication being accessible to staff and residents who lacked knowledge, training, and the necessary qualifications to administer medication. Findings: During an observation on March 14, 2022, at 9:10 AM, in the resident's room, it was noted that Silvadene cream® had been left unattended on the bedside table next to Resident 12. During an interview on March 14, 2022, at 9:12 AM, with Resident 12, he stated, That's [name of Registered Nurse] (RN1), she left the cream. she's too lazy to put it on me herself, so she leaves it there for the CNA (certified nursing assistant) to apply it. During an interview on March 14, 2022, at 9:18 AM, with a certified nursing assistant (CNA 1), she stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ROCKWELL HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROCKWELL HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 01/05/2021
PETERSON, TANNERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/11/2023
VILLANUEVA, RICKYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/18/2023
POWELL, EVANGELINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$572K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 14%Other / private 39%

This home reported $572K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$514per resident / day
operating cost
$15,611per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$595per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055557. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next