Bayside Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 329 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 149 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 93.1 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.22 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) The dry food storage room had proper ventilation and temperature control. This failure had the potential to lead to the spoilage of the stored food items thereby increasing the risk of contracting foodborne illness (caused by eating or drinking something that is contaminated with germs or chemicals) among the residents. 2) Kitchen staff consistently followed proper hand hygiene and sanitary practices when handling clean dishes and trays. This failure could facilitate the spread of harmful microorganisms, increasing the risk of contracting foodborne illness among the residents. Findings:1) During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/2/25 at 11:15 a.m. with the dietary supervisor (DS), inside the kitchen's dry food storage room, the temperature inside the room felt warm. The installed home analog thermometer had a temperature reading of 75 F (degrees Fahrenheit). DS agreed that the room felt warmer than usual and stated that staff checked the storage room temperature twice a day.During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a potentially contaminated tube of medication was not stored in the medication room.This facility failure had the potential for ineffective treatment for residents.During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/2025 at 3:07 p.m. with the assistant director of nursing (ADON), in the medication room, a tube of clotrimazole 1% (a topical antifungal) stored in the medication room was observed to be opened. The ADON was unable to determine if the tube of clotrimazole 1% was used or not due to the absence of labeling. The ADON acknowledged that the medication might be contaminated and indicated it should have been disposed of. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Label/Store Drugs & Biologicals, [undated], the P&P indicated Drugs and biological used in the facility will be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instruction as well as the expiration date when applicable.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), rights for a fair and proper discharge when the facility failed to do an accurate assessment of the resident's mental capacity to understand the meaning of leaving the facility against medical advice (AMA) and denied the resident an appropriate assessment to determine return to the facility after being cleared by the emergency department (ED) physician. This facility failure resulted in an extended hospital stay and transfer from the ED to a facility more than two hours away limiting the resident's only nearby advocate's ability to visit and provide support. Findings: During a review of the medical record (MR) for Resident 2, the Face Sheet (FS), indicated a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Resident 2 had multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction ([stroke] decreased oxygen supply causing brain damage), encephalopathy (brain dysfunction that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) had Ativan (lorazepam -antianxiety medication): 1) administered as ordered by the physician and 2) reported to the physician when the Ativan was not effective. These failures resulted in Resident 2 receiving more Ativan than prescribed, and to a delay in notifying the physician when medication did not appear effective. Findings: Review of [NAME] and [NAME], Tenth Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 607-608 in the section titled, Medication Administration, indicated, To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some ways to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights: 1. The right medication 2. The right dose 3. The right patient 4. The right route 5. The right time 6. The right documentation 7. The right indication. During a review of Resident 2's Physician Order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure food and ice were stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Facial hair coverings were not worn during food preparation; 2. One ice machine contained a brownish pink substance on the censor on the metal grate where ice is formed; and 3. There was lack of an air gap for one of the ice machines located in central supply room. This failure has the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness to residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 11/12/2024 at 12:28 p.m. in the kitchen, Diet Aid (DA) 2 was seen putting cold items from the reach in refrigerator onto lunch trays. DA2 was wearing a blue surgical mask. Facial hair was seen outside of the surgical mask on both sides of the face that was uncovered. During an observation on 11/12/2024 at 3:54 p.m. in the kitchen, DA2 was preparing dinner trays. DA2 was placing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure language assistance services were provided for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 36), whose primary language is Farsi. This failure had the potential to violate Resident 36's right to be fully informed, in a language he could understand, and make decisions about his medical condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) the MDS Section A dated 8/20/24 indicated Language, Farsi. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 10:33 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, LN 2 acknowledged Resident 36's primary language is Farsi. LN 2 indicated the facility does not have language assistance services for staff to use to communicate with Resident 36. During a review of Resident 36's care plan (CP- a document that summarizes how a patient's needs will be met, and their care will be managed)) titled Communication dated 8/13/24, the CP indicated Sometimes understood in ability to express ideas and wants. Farsi is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 39 and Resident 40) had their call light within reach. These failures had the potential to result in residents not being assisted timely and had the potential to affect their psychosocial and personal hygiene needs. Findings: During an observation on 11/12/24 at 11:19 a.m. in Resident 39's room, Resident 39's call light was found on the floor. Resident 39 was not able to reach or see the call light. During an observation on 11/12/24 at 2:10 p.m. in Resident 40's room, Resident 40's call light was not placed within reach and was observed over the nightstand. During an observation on 11/12/24 at 3:30 p.m. Resident 40's call light was still over the nightstand and not placed within Resident 40's reach. During an observation on 11/13/24 at 10:04 a.m. in Resident 39's room, Resident 39's call light was found dangling from Residents 39's bed and was not within reach. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/13/24 at 10:10 a.m. with a Certified Nursing Assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored and available for use. This failure had the potential for unsafe and ineffective medication administration to residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Licensed Nurse (LN1) on 11/12/24 at 11:15 a.m., in the B-Hall Nurse Station 1 there was a meedication storage room refrigerator. A box containing five vials of Engerix-B® Hepatitis B (a liver infection) Vaccine (safe and effective way to protecting people from harmful diseases) (protects against hepatitis B, a liver infection caused by the hepatitis B virus), 20 mcg/mL (microgram/milliliter - unit of measure) with was observed with an expiration date of 8/24/24. LN 1 acknowledged the expiration date and stated, It should be discarded. During an interview on 11/12/24 at 12:15 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON confirmed the five vials of Engerix-B® Hepatitis B Vaccine were expired and should be discarded. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Disposal of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value, flavor, and was palatable. This failure resulted in lack of flavor and palatability in pureed foods and has the potential for the eight residents on a pureed diet to have a decreased food intake which can further compromise the nutrition and medical status. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/13/2024 at 10:13 a.m. in the kitchen, [NAME] (CK) 1 was observed making pureed chicken for eight residents. CK 1 stated that chicken had been cooked with tarragon and paprika. CK1 was observed placing approximately 5 cups of cooked chicken into a blender then added hot water to the fill the contents to the top of the blender to total 8 cups. CK1 then blended the chicken and poured contents into a large bowl. CK1 added an unmeasured amount of thickener three times to reach a mashed potato like consistency. CK1 then placed pureed food into oven to keep warm until tray line. During an observation on 11/13/2024 at 10:31 a.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were accommodated on meal trays for three of 18 sampled residents (Resident 18, 27, and 63). This failure has the potential to result in residents not having their food preferences met. Findings: During a lunch meal observation and a concurrent review of Resident 18's lunch meal tray ticket, and concurrent interview with a Dietary Aide (DA3) on 11/12/24 at 12:21 p.m. in the kitchen, the try ticket showed, NO SOUP SPOONS ON TRAY*. Upon observation one soup spoon and one regular tablespoon were located on Resident 18's meal tray. When the cart was ready to leave the kitchen, DA3 was asked about the spoon and stated, Oh no and took it off the tray. During a lunch meal observation on 11/12/24 at 12:35 p.m. in the kitchen, the lunch tray ticket showed Resident 63 had requeseted a Peanut Butter (Packet)*. There was no peanut butter packet on the lunch tray. During a lunch meal observation on 11/12/24 at 12:37 p.m. in the kitchen, Resident 27's lunch meal tray ticket showed a request…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPASS HEALTH, INC. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA