Mission View Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 385 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 248 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.36 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.43 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were kept safe, in good quality, free of contaminants and properly labeled with received and within expiration dates. This failure has the potential for food borne illnesses for the residents. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/16/25 at 7:30 a.m., the following items were observed: A box of strawberries had mold at the bottom of the box; an opened bag of cucumbers, an open bag of carrots and a bag of salad had no label with open and use by dates. During an Interview on 12/16/25 at 7:30 a.m. with Dietary Assistant (DA), the DA validated the findings and verbalized that the staff should have inspected the produce and have labeled the items with the opened and use by dates of the produce. During an observation on 12/16/25 10:00 a.m. at station 1, the resident refrigerator was inspected. The following were identified: 3 soup cups with the use by date of 12/14, 2 soup cups with a use by date of 12/15; 2 sandwiches with a use by date of 12/13; 6 sandwiches with use by date of 12/15.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses (LNs) demonstrated competency in providing quality care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), as evidenced by: 1. LN1 failed to document on the medication administration record (MAR) during the medication pass.2. Medication was found at the bedside for Resident 1. These failures had the potential to result in negative resident outcomes, jeopardizing the quality and safety of resident care.1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/23/25, at 1:25 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON), the clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed and the MAR indicated, Lisinopril 10 mg tablet (medication for high blood pressure) was scheduled to be administered on 7/13/25 at 8:00 p.m. there was no documentation that the medication was administered, held, or that Resident 1 refused medication administration. The DON stated the expectation is that LN1 would document on the MAR during the medication pass that the medication was administered, held, or that Resident 1 refused. DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore eye protection when they entered the room who was on droplet precaution for 1 (Resident #43) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control for Residents with Suspected or Confirmed SARS-COV-2 [severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2], with a copyright date of 2021, revealed Personal Protective Equipment 13. Staff who enter the room of a resident with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection will adhere to standard precautions and use a NIOSH [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health]-approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher, gown, gloves, and eye protection (i.e. [id est, that is], goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face). A Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #43 on 10/22/2019. According to the Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of epilepsy, type 2 diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-12-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility documents the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in safe operating condition when the reach in refrigerator door contained a torn gasket and there was no air gap on the food preparation sink when the pipe was directly plummed into the wall. These failures have the potential for the refrigerator to not maintain a safe temperature for food as a torn gasket can allow warm air to get into the refrigerator and lack of an air gap can lead to a backflow of sewage into the food preparation sink. The facility census was 93. Findings: 1. During the inital kitchen tour on 11/19/21 starting at 9:16 AM, an observation of the reach-in refrigerator was 42 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and on the center refrigerator door the gasket was torn. During an observation and concurrent interview with the Maintanence Director (MD) on 11/29/21 at 3:19 PM, the reach-in refrigerator door with torn gasket was shown to the MD. MD stated once a month he cleans the condensing coils however not routine to check gaskets on the doors. MD stated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure documentation on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment tool used to identify and manage resident health status and needs every three months and annually) accurately reflected a weight loss of 15 pounds (10.9%) in 6 months in one resident (Resident 68). This facility failure resulted to Resident 68 from receiving an accurate reflection of a decline in health and had the potential to prevent the provision of needed health interventions. Findings: During a lunch dining observation on 11/29 at 1:10 pm, and concurrent review of Resident 68's lunch tray ticket showed the resident was on SB6 Fort (Small & bite sized fortified) diet and a house supplement. Resident 68 stated she did not like the food provided however had not informed any staff at the facility. Surveyor observed Resident 68 ate 50% of the lunch meal. During an interview with Registered Dietitians (RD 1, RD 2 and RD 3) on 12/01/21 at 11:10 AM, RD 1 and RD 2 stated they fill out section K and L of the MDS for residents. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of clinical records and facility documents, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 68) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status when the facility did not carry out the recommendations from the IDT meeting. This failure had the potential to result in the resident not maintaining her weight which can further compromise her nutritional and medical status. Findings: Weight loss in nursing home residents is linked to poor out comes, including higher rates of hospitalization and death (American Journal of Nursing, 2008). Centers for Medicare/Medicaid (CMS) suggest the following parameters for evaluating undesired weight loss. A loss of 5% (percent) after 1 month; 7.5% within 3 months and 10% within 6 months is considered significant. Weight loss greater than the described parameters are suggestive of severe weight loss (Centers for Medicaid/Medicare (CMS), Appendix PP, 2017). Additionally, insidious weight loss is defined as a gradual, unintended,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 6), documentation on the informed consent for psychotropic medication included the specific medication name, dosage, route, and diagnosis/reason for use. For Resident 6, this facility failure resulted in their representative consenting to an unspecified treatment on their behalf. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, [Facility name] Verification of Informed Consent for Psychotherapeutic Medication or Physical Restraint, (undated), the P&P indicated, .the facility has verified that the following material information has been reviewed with the resident and/or the resident's responsible party or legal representative .medication name, dosage, route and diagnosis/reason for use . During a review of Resident 6's Physician Order Sheet (Orders), dated November 2021, the Orders indicated, Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) 50 mg (milligram) tablet (50mg) TABLET Oral (by mouth) .One time daily . During a concurrent interview and record review on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored and available for staff use, in one of four medication carts inspected. These failures had the potential for unsafe and ineffective medication administration that can cause harm to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview, and inspection of the facility's medication carts, on 11/30/2021 at 3:30 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director in Training (DIT), the following items were observed: 1. Fiber therapy, dietary fiber supplement, 52 teaspoon doses, net weight (wt) 13 ounces (oz), 368 grams (g), with an expiration date of 10/21. 2. Geri-Lanta, regular strength antacid, anti-gas, 12 fluid (FL) ounces (oz), 355 milliliters (ml), with an expiration date of 9/21. 3. Hydroco/apap (medication to treat pain) tablets 5-325 milligrams(mg) pack, with an expiration date of 11/4/2021. During the concurrent interview with the DIT, the expired items were shown to him. The DIT stated, Yes they are expired. The items were then shown to the DON. The DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPASS HEALTH, INC. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA