San Luis Post Acute Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 273 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 88.2 residents a day — about 54% occupied, or roughly 74 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.59 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan with resident-specific interventions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) related to non-compliance with care and refusal to wear protective foam boots (designed to protect patient's feet-heels, ankles).This failure resulted in the development of maggots in the dorsal (upper side) wound of Resident 1's left foot and was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 9/24/25, at 11:24 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, The resident (Resident 1) was admitted on [DATE] with 10 plus wounds. All were pre-existing wounds upon admission. Resident 1's History and Physical dated 9/3/25, revealed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included PAD (Peripheral Artery Disease [a condition where arteries that carry blood to the arms, legs, and feet become narrow or blocked]) with associated chronic venous stasis (condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT- a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their clients) failed to conduct an assessment of self-administration of medications, obtain a doctor's order, and ensure a care plan was developed for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 30). This failure had the potential to increase the risk for medication errors which could compromise the safety and well-being of Resident 30. Findings: Resident 30 is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified asthma with acute exacerbation (a sudden worsening of asthma symptoms, where the specific type of asthma is not specified, requiring immediate medical attention). On 3/10/25 at 10:15 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 30 was observed holding in her hand, an inhaler medication. Resident 30 stated that she was a retired physician and aware of how to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The nourishment refrigerator that contained multiple food items had a temperature of 46 degrees 2. A boxed food item that was stored in the freezer had an expired date. This failure had the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms that can cause foodborne illness to 66 residents admitted to the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation of the Station 1 nourishment room refrigerator on 3/12/25 at 1:59 p.m., there were two thermometers located inside the refrigerator that showed the temperature was 42 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The refrigerator contained sandwiches, yogurts and milk. The yogurt dated 3/10/25, temperature was 46 degrees F. The low-fat milk was 46.2 degrees F. At 2:00 p.m. a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD), confirmed and validated the temperature of the milk. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/12/25 at 2:01 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper hand hygiene during direct resident contact for one of 18 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infectious disease throughout the facility. Findings: During an observation on 3/12/25 at 10:05 a.m., in resident room, Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 was observed performing a brief change for Resident 18. LN2 cleaned stool from Resident 18's buttocks and rolled Resident 18 onto the right side while wearing the same soiled gloves. LN2 did not perform hand hygiene or change gloves prior to touching resident. During an interview on 3/12/25 at 10:40 a.m., with LN2, LN2 stated, I know I should have changed my gloves. I wiped her poop. During an interview on 3/13/25 at 9:45 a.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), both were informed that during an interview with LN2, LN2 stated she was aware that she should have changed her soiled glove after she completed the brief change but she did not. DSD stated LN2 will complete…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, nd record review the facility failed to ensure the walk-in freezer was maintained in a safe operating condition. There was excessive ice buildup in the freezer. This failure had the potential to result in reduced efficiency and temperature fluctuations that can lead to improper food preservation. The facility census was 66. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour that started on 3/10/25 at 10:17 a.m., the following were observed: ice buildup on different areas and surfaces including the freezer pipes (approximately 6 inches by 3 inches and 2-inch-deep of ice), the plastic air curtains hanging in the doorway contained ice buildup approximately half to three quarters of the way down the curtain flaps. On the shelf under the fans, two different areas with ice on the shelf below approximately two inches in length. The second area was approximately eight inches in length. Around the door and gasket, there was ice buildup with the width of the doorway. The freezer door on the outside at bottom there was also ice buildup. During an interview on 3/11/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, facility policy review, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure all potential sources of water-borne illness were identified and monitored. This deficient practice affected all 65 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Legionella Water Management and Risk Reduction and Prevention Program, revealed, Our facility is committed to the prevention, detections and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella. The policy specified, 3. The purposes of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria could grow and spread, and to reduce the risks of Legionnaire's disease [a type of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria]. A review of the facility Legionella Prevention Program Maintenance Log, revealed no evidence to indicate the facility monitored the bathtubs in the facility, the water fountains, the laundry area, or the kitchen dishwasher. During an interview on 01/18/2024 at 11:01 AM, the Maintenance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to notify the state designated authority when a significant change in status assessment was completed for 1 (Resident #7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR). Findings included: A review of Resident #7's Face Sheet, revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/01/2009, with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of colon, anxiety, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, and major depressive disorder. A review of a document addressed to Resident #7 from the State of California - Health and Human Services Agency Department of Health Care Services, dated 01/28/2019, revealed Resident #7's Level II PASARR evaluation suggested the resident was best served in a skilled nursing facility bed with access to services. A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/19/2023, was signed as being completed on 12/26/2023. A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-05-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain informed consent for an increased dose of a psychotropic medication (Seroquel) prior to administration for one out of 24 sampled residents, (Resident 31). This failure had the potential for the responsible party to be uninformed of the risks and benefits of the medication. Findings: Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Right To Be Informed/Make Treatment Decisions dated 3/18/2018 indicated the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional of the risk and benefits of proposed care, of treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or options he or she prefers. During a concurrent record review and interview on 5/14/2021 at 10:45 a.m., with the assistant director of nursing (ADON), the document titled Physician Orders dated 5/7/21, indicated in part . Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) increased to 75mg . for Resident 31. Further review of Resident 31's electronic health record (EHR) did not contain a signed informed consent for this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-05-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a care directive during life threatening situations) matched the electronic medical record (EMR) in one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 16), This facility failure had the potential to cause a delay in receiving or incorrectly administering life-sustaining treatments. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/12/21, at 12:11 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON), Resident 16's POLST was reviewed. The POLST indicated do not attempt resuscitation (DNR), selective treatment IV (in the vein) fluids, IV antibiotics, do not intubate and a trial period of artificial nutrition including feeding tubes. Resident 16's Physician Orders in the EMR were reviewed. The physician orders indicated DNR and comfort measures only. The physician orders did not indicate a trial period of artificial nutrition. The DON agreed the records did not match. The DON indicated the physician order in the EMR was changed on 11/11/19 discontinuing the trial period of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-05-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS-Resident Assessment and Care Screening tool used to guide care) was accurate for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 17) when: 1. The dental assessment of Resident 14's broken and missing teeth was not reflected on the MDS. 2. Resident 17's neurological status of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) was left blank. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 14's and 17's identified care needs to go unmet. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/11/21, at 11:55 a.m., with Resident 14, Resident 14 indicated having right upper tooth pain. The tooth was observed to be yellow/brown in color and also noted were several missing teeth. Resident 14 further indicated x-rays of teeth was performed ,the tooth needed to be extracted and causes pain when eating. During a review of Resident 14's Dental Care evaluation form dated 3/2/20, the evaluation indicated, Resident 14 had multiple missing teeth and many cavities that are not restorable.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMPASS HEALTH, INC. — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA