No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Springs Health And Rehabilitation Center

25924 Jackson Ave, Murrieta, CA 92563 · For profit - Partnership · 170 certified beds · (951) 417-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (951) 417-8200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$26,918 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,918 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-08)
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
40461 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
Pharmacy
40500 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd · (951) 696-4513 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
40250 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd · (951) 366-9936 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.2%7.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.1%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.912.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.271.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 722 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.83U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.42hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.37hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 278 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.83 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.9%CMS range 55.4–62.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 9.0–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.9–8.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
41.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 160.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-15)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and treatment services to prevent recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system which include the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra) to a resident with an indwelling catheter (IC - a flexible tube passed into the bladder to allow urine to drain), for one of three residents reviewed (Resident A). This failure resulted in Resident A to have recurrent episodes of UTIs on April 15, May 18, June 2, August 4, and August 25, 2023. In addition, Resident A was transferred to the acute hospital on August 26, 2023, due to a change of condition secondary to UTI and Resident A expired after three days at the acute hospital due to sepsis (bacteria spread through blood). Findings: On October 5, 2023, at 10:05 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint related to quality of care. On October 5, 2023, Resident A's record was reviewed. Resident A was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety and sanitation were observed in he kitchen when:1. Multiple ham and cheese sandwiches found undated in the kitchen and at Station 2 Clean utility room refrigerators;2. A plastic container of ketchup was found in the kitchen refrigerator with the corner of the lid open to air;3. Two packages of meat were found in the freezer undated;4. Multiple food items were found in the Clean Utility Room of Station 3 refrigerator not labeled and undated;5. A small amount of orange colored residue was found on a plastic piece of the ice machine in the Clean Utility Room of Station 2; 6. A large tomato sauce can was placed on a tray with parchment paper that was going to be used to cook the lunchtime garlic bread and;7. A Dietary Aide (DA) left the kitchen and returned to work with food products without washing hands.These failures had the potential to result in the spread of foodborne illness to the vulnerable residents who consumed meals in the facility kitchen.Findings:On December 8, 2025, at 10 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided, for two of 32 sampled residents (Residents 163 and 8) when: 1. For Resident 163, hydralazine (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was not administered according to the physician's order; and 2. For Resident 8, blood sugar was not closely monitored related to use of long-acting insulin. These failures had the potential for a delay in care and treatment and could cause a decline in the residents' overall health condition. Findings: 1. On December 11, 2025, a review of Resident 163's admission Record, indicated Resident 163 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure and hypertensive (high blood pressure) chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident 163's medical records indicated the following physician's orders: - hydralazine HCl tablet 25 mg (milligram - unit of measurement). Give 1 (one) tablet by mouth every 12 (twelve) hours as needed for HTN (hypertension -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement required infection control interventions, use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE - specialized gear like gloves, gowns, masks, and goggles used by healthcare workers to create a physical barrier against infectious agents, protecting them from blood, body fluids, and germs, ensuring safety during patient care by preventing transmission pathways) and follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, for two of 78 sampled residents when: 1. The Treatment Nurse (TN) did not use PPEs while providing wound care to Resident 33, who was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control measures, primarily in nursing homes, requiring staff to wear gowns and gloves for all high-contact care activities for residents with wounds, indwelling devices, or known colonization/infection with multidrug-resistant organisms);2. A Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) was observed transporting a large soiled linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 16) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when Resident 16 was administered lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) without adequate behavioral monitoring during the use of lorazepam. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medications for Resident 16 which increased the potential for medication interactions, adverse reactions, and unidentified risks associated with the use of lorazepam that included but not limited to sedation, dizziness, unsteadiness, and difficulty concentrating. Findings:On December 10, 2025, at 10:39 a.m., a group interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 1 regarding the facility's psychotropic medication management process. The DON and ADON 1 stated all psychotropic medication orders were expected to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of two IV (intravenous, into the vein) Medication Emergency Kits (E-kit; a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) was replaced timely after being opened in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure resulted in the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions.Findings:On December 8, 2025, at 11 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 1 in the medication storage room at nursing station 1. One IV Medication E-kit was identified sealed with a yellow lock. ADON 1 stated the yellow lock indicated the IV Medication E-kit had been opened by nursing staff and needed to be replaced by the pharmacy. ADON 1 stated the following regarding the e-kit process and the expectation from the nursing staff after the e-kit was opened: -Should fill out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendation were acted upon, for two of seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 7 and 8) when:1.For Resident 7, the duration of heparin (an anticoagulant [blood thinner] solution used to prevent and treat blood clots in various medical conditions and procedures) therapy was not indicated. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to be exposed to unnecessary medication and placed the resident at risk for adverse effects; and2.For Resident 8, episodes of blood sugar levels above 300 mg/dl (milligram/deciliter - unit of measurement)was not evaluated by the physician. This failure had the potential for the medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome for Resident 8. Findings:1.On December 11, 2025, at 11:36 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 7 was conducted. Resident 7 was observed sitting on a wheelchair in the dining room in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from unnecessary medications, for one of seven residents (Resident 7), when the use of heparin (an anticoagulant [blood thinner] solution used to prevent and treat blood clots in various medical conditions and procedures) was not evaluated for the continued use.This failure has the potential to cause Resident 7 to develop adverse reactions from unnecessary medications.Findings:On December 11, 2025, at 11:36 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 7 was conducted. Resident 7 was observed sitting on a wheelchair in the dining room in front of the dining table waiting for lunch to be served. In a concurrent interview with Resident 7, he stated he is able to propel his wheelchair inside the facility.On December 11, 2025, at 11:40 a.m., Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 2 was interviewed. RNA 2 stated she had been RNA for more than four years and have provided RNA exercises to Resident 7. RNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-23 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the notice of transfer/discharge was provided to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (assists with conflict resolution and protection of resident rights) prior to the planned discharge, for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3). This failure had the potential to violate the resident's rights to appeal their discharge. Findings: On June 2, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint on discharges. 1. A review of the admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction (muscle weakness or paralysis to one side of the body), metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder), and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and thinking abilities). A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated May 13, 2025, at 11:21 a.m., indicated, .spoke with (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), of the following: 1. Behavior of anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness); 2. Psychotic behavior (refers to the observable actions, thoughts, and expression of a person experiencing psychosis [mental state or condition itself, describing a range of symptoms including those that manifest as psychotic behavior]); and 3. Side effects for use of psychotropic medications (drugs that affect the brain and nervous system, primarily used to treat mental health conditions). This failure had the potential for unnecessary medication use. Findings: On April 4, 2025, at 9:10 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], under general in-patient hospice (a short-term, crisis-like level of care for hospice patients who need more intensive symptom management) care with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Resident 3 ' s Responsible Person (RP- person designated as being responsible for another person's medical and/or financial decisions) as well as other emergency contacts, of Resident 3 ' s change of condition (COC) and subsequent transfer to the general acute care hospital (GACH) on January 17, 2025. This resulted in the RP and emergency contacts being uninformed and unaware of Resident 3 ' s COC and transfer to the GACH. Findings: On January 29, 2025, at 9:37 a.m., Resident 3's RP was interviewed via telephone. The RP stated in the morning of January 17, 2025, family member (FM) 1 visited Resident 3 but did not stay long since Resident 3 had a cough. The RP stated in the afternoon of January 17, 2025, the facility called and notified her that Resident 3 ' s blood pressure (BP) was low and they were going to start intravenous (IV- into the vein) fluid hydration, and may possibly do an X-ray, after which the RP were to receive another update.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the Responsible Person (RP) notification of one of three residents' (Resident 3) transfer to the general acute care hospital (GACH) on January 17, 2025. This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation of events in relation to Resident 3 ' s transfer process. Findings: On January 29, 2025, at 9:37 a.m., the RP was interviewed via telephone. The RP stated in the morning of January 17, 2025, family member (FM) 1 visited Resident 3 but did not stay long since Resident 3 had a cough. The RP stated in the afternoon of January 17, 2025, the facility called and notified her that Resident 3's blood pressure (BP) was low and that they were going to start intravenous (IV- into the vein) fluid hydration, and may possibly do an X-ray, after which they were to receive another update. The RP stated neither she nor her family members (FMs) received any notification from the facility thereafter. The RP stated the following morning (Saturday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered as ordered by the physician, for one of three residents (Resident A). This failure had the potential for Resident A's pain not be managed and affect overall health condition. Findings: On January 2, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On January 2, 2025, a review of Resident A's medical record was conducted. Resident A was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included atherosclerotic (a buildup of fats, cholesterol, and other substances in and on the artery walls) heart disease and polyneuropathy (a condition where multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body become damaged or malfunction). A review of Resident A's care plan, dated June 26, 2023, indicated, .Resident is at risk for pain r/t (related to) risk factors .Interventions .Administer medications as ordered . A review of Resident A's Order Summary Report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident receive the necessary care and treatment to prevent and treat allergic reactions, for one of four residents reviewed (Resident A) when: 1. Resident A's allergy to aspirin (medication to treat pain, fever, headache, and inflammation. It can also reduce the risk of heart attack) was not listed in the allergy list. Aspirin was administered to Resident A from June 3 to 17, 2024, and June 19 to 22, 2024 (total of 19 days); and 2. Resident A did not receive medication to treat signs and symptoms of allergic reaction. These failures resulted in Resident A to be transferred to the general acute hospital and acquired toxic epidermal necrolysis (a rare, life-threatening skin reaction, usually caused by a medication. It's a severe form of [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome [SJS- a rare, serious disorder of the skin and mucous membranes usually a reaction to medication that starts with flu-like symptoms, followed by a painful rash that spreads and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the status of 1 (Resident #91) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition and 1 (Resident #101) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dementia care. Specifically, the MDS assessments inaccurately indicated Resident #91's weight-loss was due to a physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen and did not reflect Resident #101's use of bed and wander/elopement alarms. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment, revised in 03/2023, revealed, 1. The facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, standardized reproducible assessment of each resident's functional capacity. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #91 on 10/21/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of liver cancer and encounter for palliative care. Resident #91's Care Plan included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff properly donned personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering the room of 1 (Resident #268) of 4 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Isolation-Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, revised on 09/01/2023, revealed, III. A. Contact precautions are implemented for residents known or suspected to be infected or colonized with microorganisms that are transmitted by direct contact with the resident or indirect contact with environmental surfaces or resident-care items in the resident's environment. i. Examples of infections requiring Contact Precautions include, but are not limited to: a. Gastrointestinal, respiratory, skin, or wound infections or colonization with multi-drug resistant organisms (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], MRSA [Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus]. The policy further revealed, gloves (clean, nonsterile) are worn when entering the room, and gown is worn for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one three residents (Resident A) was free from verbal abuse when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was witnessed to have used explicit words towards Resident A in the hallway. This failure resulted in a verbal abuse from CNA towards Resident A and had the potential to have a negative effect on the psychological, behavioral, or psychosocial outcomes to maintain or improve resident's overall well-being. Findings: On April 10, 2024, at 10 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate an incident of verbal abuse was conducted. On April 10, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Assistant Administrator (AADM). The AADM stated CNA 1 reported she overheard CNA 2 told Resident A, Fuck you, you are a grown woman, why are you acting like this? in the hallway. The AADM stated the facility had completed their investigation and confirmed by multiple witnesses that CNA 1 indeed verbally abused Resident A on the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one three residents (Resident A), an incident of verbal abuse from a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) towards Resident A was reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within two hours. This failure resulted to a delay in the reporting and investigation of a verbal abuse and potentially placed Resident A and/or other residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: On April 10, 2024, at 10 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate an incident of verbal abuse was conducted. On April 10, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Assistant Administrator (AADM). The AADM stated on March 28, 2023, at around 11:30 a.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) received report from CNA 1 of an alleged verbal abuse towards Resident A. The AADM stated CNA 1 reported that on March 28, 2024, between 4 a.m. to 5 a.m., she overheard CNA 2 told Resident A, Fuck you, you are a grown woman, why are you acting like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure for one three residents (Resident A), was free from any further abuse, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was not removed from all patient care after being witnessed by other staff to have verbally abused Resident A in the hallway. This failure had the potential to placed Resident A and/or other residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: On April 10, 2024, at 10 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate an incident of verbal abuse was conducted. On April 10, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Assistant Administrator (AADM). The AADM stated the Director of Staff Development (DSD) received report from CNA 1 of an alleged verbal abuse towards Resident A on March 28, 2023, at around 11:30 a.m. The AADM stated CNA 1 reported she overheard CNA 2 told Resident A, Fuck you, you are a grown woman, why are you acting like this? in the hallway on March 28, 2024, between 4 a.m. to 5 a.m. The AADM stated after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure home medications were destructed or disposed according to the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Multiple Dilaudid (narcotic medication for pain) tablets were destructed together with non-narcotic medications; and 2. Multiple Zofran (medication to treat nausea) tablets and a tube of antifungal cream (medication to treat fungal skin infection) were destructed without verification of the physician orders for the medication. These failures had the potential administration error, inaccurate reconciliation, and drug diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their unintended purposes) of narcotic and non-narcotic medications. Findings: On October 20, 2023, at 9:50 a.m., an unannounced visit ws conducted at the facility to investigate a compliant on quality of care. On October 20, 2023, at 10:25 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was interviewed. She stated home medications were to be given to the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) for review. She stated narcotic medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a scabies (a parasitic infestation of the skin caused by an itch mite) outbreak to the California Department of Health (CDPH), within 24 hours according to the facility's policy and procedure and CDPH scabies outbreak reporting timeframe guidelines. This failure had the potential to interfere with facility operations and agencies ability to respond to outbreak as needed. Findings: On August 17, 2023, at 2 p.m., a concurrent interview and record review with the Infection Preventionist (IP) was conducted. She stated one resident was positive for scabies on July 28, 2023. She stated 10 residents were tested for scabies on August 7, 2023 due to presence of rashes, and one resident was identified positive for scabies on August 11, 2023. She stated she reported the scabies outbreak to the state agency on August 16, 2023 (19 days after onset of outbreak). On August 17, 2023, at 5:10 p.m., during an interview with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON), they both stated the scabies outbreak…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure skin condition was identified, addressed, and monitored timely, for one of two residents reviewed for skin condition (Resident A), when Resident A had a scab (a dry, rough protective crust that forms over a cut or wound during healing) on her front scalp (skin covering the head). This failure had the potential to result in a delay in the care and treatment for Resident A's scab on her front scalp, which could worsen the overall health skin condition for Resident A. Findings: On April 5, 2023, at 11:48 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a facility reported incident. On April 5, 2023, at 11:55 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated on April 2, 2023, at around 2:43 p.m., Resident A's family member notified the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) of a scab observed on the resident's front scalp. The DON stated the LVN was not able to provide any information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment when: 1. The facility failed to assess changes in skin condition for three of eight residents (Residents 70, 73, and 88) reviewed for skin conditions. The facility failed to assess Residents 70 and 88's skin discolorations and Resident 73's open skin. These failures had the potential to result in delayed treatment, which could cause worsening of Residents 70, 73, and 88's, skin conditions; and 2. The facility failed for one of five residents (Resident 66) reviewed for dialysis (the process of removing waste or fluid from the blood with the use of a machine) to obtain a physician order for monitoring, care, and treatment of Resident 66's right upper chest Quinton catheter site (a central venous catheter inserted thru a large vein into the heart). This failure had the potential for Resident 66 to develop an infection and experience complications. Findings: 1. a) On August 17, 2021, at 11:52 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored, according to the facility's policy and regulatory requirements when: 1. For Resident 49, one albuterol inhaler (medication to treat shortness of breath) was found unsecured on top of Resident 49's bedside table; 2. For Resident 5, one bottle of nystatin powder (medication to treat fungal infection) was found unsecured on top of Resident 5's bedside table; 3. For Resident 230, one small tub of Eucerin cream (medicated cream) was found unsecured on top of Resident 230's bedside table; 4. For Resident 88, one-unit dose of albuterol (medication to treat shortness of breath) was found unsecured on top of Resident 88's drawer; and 5. For Resident 66, two small packets of hydrocortisone cream (medication to treat a skin condition) were found unsecured on top of Resident 66's bedside table. These failures increased the possibility for Residents 5, 49, 66, 88, and 230, to receive medications unsafely. Findings: 1. On August 17, 2021, at 11:15 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were observed, when: 1. One staff member unvaccinated for COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory disease spread from person to person) did not wear a respirator mask when inside of the facility; 2. Inside the bathroom of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], one unlabeled bedpan was stored between the wall and the handrail; 3. Resident 88's suction tubing with a Yankauer tip (a type of device used to remove oral secretions) and nebulizer tubing with a chamber (a container to hold a liquid medication for breathing treatments) were observed stored together inside a plastic bag and were undated; 4. One staff entered the PUI unit (Person Under Investigation - a designated unit for residents under observation for suspected or exposed to COVID-19) without wearing a respirator mask (N95 - a mask to filter airborne particles); and 5. Multiple facility staff did not observe proper hand hygiene and wearing of PPE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-23 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their infection control program to prevent the spread of COVID-19 (a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by a corona virus that can be spread from person to person) when the facility did not conduct daily COVID-19 testing for facility staff according to their policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19 infection among healthcare personnel and residents, which could result in an outbreak affecting the vulnerable facility residents. Findings: On August 17, 2021, at 2:50 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated the facility conducted daily COVID-19 testing by antigen rapid test for all facility staff who were scheduled to work. The DON stated all staff were tested before starting work. On August 19, 2021, the daily COVID-19 staff testing records and staffing records were reviewed. The records indicated the following: 1. The facility Daily Nursing Staffing Sign-In Log, dated August 16, 2021, indicated there were 71 staff members recorded…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the need of one resident (Resident 91), when the facility did not provide batteries for the hearing aids used by Resident 91. This failure resulted in Resident 91 to not be able to hear properly and communicate effectively. Findings: On August 16, 2021, at 12:43 p.m., Resident 91 was observed inside her room, sitting in the wheelchair and watching television. Resident 91 was alert and able to answer questions. During an interview, Resident 91 pointed to her right and left hearing aids and stated, I can't hear you, no battery. Resident 91's record was reviewed. Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hearing loss bilateral (both) ears. The BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - an assessment for cognitive status) indicated a score of 15 out of 15 - cognitively intact. The Social Services Progress Notes dated August 2, 2021, were reviewed. The notes indicated, .Social Service informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the Responsible Party (RP) when there was a change of condition (COC) in one of five residents (Resident 95) reviewed for skin condition. This failure resulted in Resident 95's RP not being notified of Resident 95's change of condition on the right and left buttocks on July 29, 2021. Findings: On August 18, 2021, Resident 95's record was reviewed. Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included left breast metastatic cancer (cancer that spread to other parts of the body), status post left mastectomy (a surgical operation for breast removal)) pulmonary embolism ( a blood clot in the lungs), pneumonia (infection of the lungs) and chest wall abscess (an infection in the upper part of the chest) and chronic kidney disease (kidney failure). The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE], was reviewed. The assessment indicated the following: .Alert and oriented to person, place and situation .; .ADLs, (Activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Responsible Party (RP) for one of three residents (Resident 95) reviewed for closed records, when Resident 95 was transferred to the hospital due to a change of condition. This failure resulted in Resident 95's RP not being notified of Resident 95's transfer to the acute hospital on August 3, 2021. Findings: On August 18, 2021, Resident 95's record was reviewed. Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included left breast metastatic cancer (cancer that spread to other parts of the body), status post left mastectomy (a surgical operation for breast removal)) pulmonary embolism ( a blood clot in the lungs), pneumonia (infection of the lungs) and chest wall abscess (an infection in the upper part of the chest) and chronic kidney disease (kidney failure). The laboratory blood work for Resident 95's BUN (Blood urea nitrogen - medical test that measures the amount of urea nitrogen in the blood, high level means the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline (an initial) care plan to address the care and treatment of an unused Quinton catheter - a central line catheter used temporarily for hemodialysis (a procedure where a dialysis machine and special filter are used to clean the blood) for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 66). This failure resulted in Resident 66 not receiving the necessary care and treatment of the unused Quinton catheter from July 2, 2021 to August 17, 2021. Findings: On August 17, 2021, at 3:05 p.m., Resident 66 was observed awake, alert and able to verbalize his needs. Resident 66 was observed with a Quinton catheter on his right upper chest area which was covered with an undated adhesive transparent dressing. In a concurrent interview with the Treatment Nurse (TN) he stated Resident 66 had not received hemodialysis treatment for a while. The TN stated the Registered Nurse (RN) was responsible for the care of the Quinton catheter. On August 18,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
    Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 73) received care and services necessary to maintain the highest level of physical and psychosocial well-being when Resident 73 did not receive an oral care. This failure increased the potential for Resident 73 to develop tooth cavities, gum infections, and cause emotional distress. Findings: On August 16, 2021, at 11:17 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview were conducted with Resident 73. Resident 73 was observed sitting in a wheelchair, alert, oriented, and conversant. Resident 73's teeth were observed to be brownish in color with food residue in between his teeth. Resident 73 also had multiple missing teeth, and bad breath. Resident 73 stated the last time his teeth were brushed was two months ago. On August 16, 2021, at 1:40 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 was interviewed. CNA 2 stated she did not provide oral care to Resident 73. On August 16, 2021, at 1:45 p.m., the Assistant Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders when the facility did not administer oxygen as ordered for two of six residents (Resident 331 and 108) reviewed for oxygen therapy. These failures had the potential for Resident 331 and 108 to experience respiratory problems and a decline in their health condition due to ineffective oxygen therapy. Findings: 1. On multiple dates and times during the survey Resident 331 was observed awake, lying in bed, and conversant. Resident 331 was observed wearing a nasal cannula (plastic tubing with two prongs connected to the nose to deliver oxygen) connected to a concentrator (a machine converting room air to oxygen) at the bedside on the following dates and times: - August 16, 2021, at 1:50 p.m.; - August 17, 2021, at 10:17 a.m.; - August 18, 2021, at 12:20 p.m.; - August 19, 2021, at 3:30 p.m.; and - August 20, 2021, at 8:20 a.m. Resident 331's record was reviewed. Resident 331 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-23 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary dental services for one of two residents (Resident 68) reviewed for dental service, when there was no follow up dental service provided for Resident 68 to address broken dentures. This failure had the potential to decrease Resident 68's food intake which could result in a decline in the resident's nutritional condition, weight loss, and decreased self-esteem. Findings: On August 17, 2021, at 10:45 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 68. Resident 68 was observed not wearing dentures. Resident 68 stated, I broke my dentures, its been a while, and I want to have a denture. Resident 68's record was reviewed. Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), anxiety disorder (feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), and major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,918 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $26,918 — penalty dated 2023-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PURSUE HEALTH — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.1+1.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PURSUE HEALTH LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
GUTIERREZ, ROLANDOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2018
JONES, WESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/29/2021
LYNCH, JOSEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2018
ABBY GL LLCOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2017
TEMECULA VALLEY WELLNESS GP LLCOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2017
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 07/01/2017
ERETZ MURRIETA PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$29.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.9M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 21%Other / private 31%

This home reported $5.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$513per resident / day
operating cost
$15,608per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$531per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555915. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next