Premier Health & Rehabilitation Center Of Lv, LP

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care delivery for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #1) by failing to document and notify a provider of significant changes in real time, failing to document facility required charting, and failing to demonstrate monitoring and documentation of the resident's status. Findings include: Resident 1 Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with metabolic encephalopathy, chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure, and schizoaffective disorder. On 9/11/2020, a provider ordered oxygen 3 liters per nasal cannula for shortness of breath each shift. On 9/12-13/2020, nursing notes documented the resident was on 3 liters per nasal cannula. On 9/14/2020, a C-reactive protein test and sedimentation rate showed abnormally high results, revealing a possible inflammatory process. These results were documented as entered for review before 2:30 PM. On 9/14/2020 at 2:48 PM, the ordering provider documented the initial history and physical, including the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff completed required steps when a resident was discharged against medical advice (AMA). Specifically, there was no documentation of: (1) a discussion of the risks associated with leaving; (2) a signed AMA form; and (3) notification of the physician and the administrator or director of nursing for 1 of 8 sampled residents (R1). The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for an unsafe or uncoordinated discharge, which could have resulted in unmet care needs or rehospitalization.Findings include:Resident 1 (R1) was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including narcolepsy without cataplexy (excessive daytime sleepiness without sudden loss of muscle tone), edema, type 2 diabetes mellitus and morbid obesity. R1 was admitted for physical and occupational therapies and continuation of medical management. R1 discharged AMA on 10/19/2025. A case management note dated 10/17/2025 documented the family wanted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order, instructions for use, and monitoring for a soft neck collar for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 95). The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of potential injury from improper use of a soft neck collar.Findings include:Resident 95 (R95) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, complete lesion at thoracic (T) vertebrae T2-T6 level of thoracic spinal cord, and spinal stenosis cervical region.On 08/26/2025 at 10:27 AM, R95 was observed seated in bed wearing a soft neck collar. R95 was manipulating the collar with both hands, freely rotating it around the neck continuously. R95 stated had sustained a fall at home resulting in neck injury and subsequent neck surgery. R95 reported no staff at the facility were checking the placement or use of the neck collar.A Provider Encounter Progress Note dated 08/20/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who experienced and reported pain received pharmacological interventions for pain management for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 23). The deficient practice had the potential for residents not to receive pain relief.Findings include:Resident 23 (R23) was admitted [DATE], with diagnosis including multiple fractures of ribs right side, acute pain due to trauma, primary ortho arthritis right shoulder, and anterior displaced fracture of sternal end of right clavicle. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], listed R23's primary medical conditions including acute pain due to trauma. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, R23 was cognitively intact. On 08/26/2025 at 9:58 AM, R23 was lying in bed awake. R23 reported was in pain at a level of 8 on a 0/10 pain scale (0= no pain, 10 = worst pain). R23 explained the right shoulder was very painful and the pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not follow the Legionella Water Management Plan. Findings include:On 8/26/2025, the Maintenance Director stated the facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) was a work in progress that was in bits and pieces and provided the Legionella Water Management Plan.The Control Measures and Monitoring portion of the WMP stated No complaints about water taste or odor. No complaints about ice taste or odor. Water heaters are drained/flushed monthly. The taste and odor of water and ice was an inaccurate test of the presence of Legionella in water. The Maintenance Director explained there was no documentation of monthly flushes of the water tanks. The Maintenance Director provided logs of monthly water temperature testing. The water temperature logs did not specify an acceptable temperature range. The Ways to Intervene When Control Limits Are Not Met section of the WMP indicated a water specialized company would retest water and provide an assessment to determine if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the free water flushes (FWF) via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach and used to provide nutritional support and feed patients who are unable to eat or drink) were provided as prescribed for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 53, 48, and 45). The deficient practice could have led to an increased risk of inadequate hydration, delayed wound healing, electrolyte imbalance and adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Resident 53 (R53) R53 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and gastrostomy. A physician's order dated 08/22/2024, documented a water flush via PEG tube at 125 milliliter (ml) every 4 hours. A Care Plan dated 09/09/2024, documented R53 was at risk for dehydration related to nothing by mouth status. The PEG tube provided all fluids and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the head of the bed was elevated to 30-45 degrees while the tube feeding (TF) was infusing and TF formula was delivered as prescribed for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 53, 45, 48, and, 1) The deficient practice could have led to an increased risk of inadequate nutrition, weight loss, aspiration, and potential respiratory complications for the affected residents. Findings include: Resident 53 (R53) R53 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy. The History and Physical dated 08/16/2024, documented R53 had severe dysphagia and the plan to continue Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach and used to provide nutritional support and feed patients who are unable to eat or drink) feeding for severe malnutrition and continue current feeding and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen vent hood, filters and dish machine were cleaned and maintained per policy. On 09/10/24 at 7:43AM, the initial kitchen observation revealed the following: -The kitchen vent exhaust hood filter with a copious amount of buildup. The Kitchen Manager indicated maintenance took care of the cleaning. -The dish machine had a copious amount of white and lime green build up on the exterior. The Dish Machine cleaning schedule was reviewed with the Kitchen Manager. The schedule documented the dish machine had been cleaned on 09/09/2024. The Kitchen Manager indicated the cleaning did not include the exterior. The Kitchen Manager verbalized; the dish machine appeared to be neglected. On 9/12/2024 at 11:14 AM, the Kitchen Manager showed that the oven, hood and dishwasher were cleaned. The Kitchen Manager explained the hood was cleaned quarterly by an outside company but then cleaned it themselves. On 9/13/2024 at 2:55 PM, the Maintenance Director indicated vent hood was cleaned every three months. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and document review, the facility failed to ensure the IV (intravenous) heplock was monitored, or discontinued when not in use for 1 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 171). This deficient practice could have resulted in potential risks, including infection, infiltration and phlebitis. Findings include: Resident 171 (R171) R171 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension and dehydration. The Activities Progress Notes dated 09/05/2024, documented R171 was alert, oriented and able to verbalize needs. The Wound/weekly Monitoring assessment dated [DATE], documented R171 had an IV implanted port on left hand back and present on admission. On 09/10/2024, at 1:41 PM, R171 was in bed and verbally responsive. R171 had an IV heplock on left hand back, which was covered with a transparent and undated dressing. R171 verbalized a nurse had placed the IV access 5 or more days ago but was not on IV medications. R171 did not understand the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the transmission-based precautions (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed upon entering the rooms, and a garbage bin was available for 2 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 33 and 69). The deficient practice could potentially lead to the spread of infectious diseases, an increased risk of cross-contamination, and compromised health and safety for both residents and staff. Findings include: Resident 33 (R33) R33 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including pressure ulcer of sacral region, malignant neoplasm, breakdown of nephrostomy catheter, and osteomyelitis. A Physician order dated 09/10/2024, documented R33 was on contact isolation precaution. A care Plan dated 09/10/2024, documented R33 had signs and symptoms of gastroenteritis manifested by frequent diarrhea or loose stools, vomiting, and other symptoms. On 09/10/2024 at 11:25 AM, R33's room had signage for contact precautions, PPEs were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Interviews with three Certified Nurse Assistants, one Registered Nurse, one Licensed Practical Nurse, the Director of Staff Development, the Director of Nursing, the Medical Director, and the Administrator evidenced an understanding of the policies and procedures related to oxygen therapy and change in resident condition. A review of the employee files of three Certified Nurse Assistants and one Licensed Practical Nurse indicated orientation training had included information on how to manage resident changes in condition including who and when to notify. A review of the medical records of Residents #8 and #11 with hypoxia in the setting of an emergency transfer to the hospital within the last six months, indicated the residents were assessed and managed in a manner synonymous with the facility policies and procedures. The deficient practice occurred in 2020. Findings from the investigation revealed the facility had been in compliance since the prior recertification survey exit date of 09/14/2023 until…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,395 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $29,395 — penalty dated 2024-10-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PURSUE HEALTH — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NV