No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES

Ownership rollup across 17 nursing homes in 2 states: Mississippi, Tennessee. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.0 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 0.8 stars below the ~2.8 average of the 2 states it operates in. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It has been broadly flat, moving +0.00 stars across the same 17 homes rated throughout between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

17
Homes in this chain
1,367
Certified beds80 per home on average
73%
Occupied993 residents a day across 1,367 beds
+0.00
Star changeacross the 17 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
2
States covered
2.0
Average CMS rating~2.8 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.3 of 517 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing3.2 of 517 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures1.8 of 517 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

5 with immediate-jeopardy citations1 Special-Focus candidates3 with an abuse flag10 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$18.6M
Related-party expensesummed across 17 homes · FY2023–2024 cost reports
18%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 17 homes reporting both figures
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 17 homes with a cost report
$591K
Total federal fines10 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 83%Medicare 6%Other / private 11%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 17 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Laurelwood Community Living CenterLaurel, MS 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $8,788 fined
Pleasant Hills Community Living CenterJackson, MS 1 of 5$140,123 fined
Sunplex Sub-Acute CenterOcean Springs, MS 1 of 513 immediate-jeopardy SFF candidate Abuse flag $144,927 fined
The Pillars Of BiloxiBiloxi, MS 1 of 5$47,692 fined
West Point Community Living CenterWest Point, MS 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $44,873 fined
Lauderdale Community Living CenterRipley, TN 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $43,644 fined
Renaissance TerraceHarriman, TN 1 of 5Abuse flag
Courtyards Comm Living CenterFulton, MS 2 of 56 immediate-jeopardy $132,468 fined
Liberty Community Living CtrLiberty, MS 2 of 5$8,988 fined
Longwood Community Living CenterBooneville, MS 2 of 5
Plaza Community Living CenterPascagoula, MS 2 of 5
Briarwood Community Living CenterLexington, TN 2 of 5
Tishomingo Comm Living CenterIuka, MS 3 of 5$10,361 fined
Vaiden Community Living CenterVaiden, MS 3 of 5$8,788 fined
Oakwood Community Living CenterDyersburg, TN 3 of 5
Bruce Community Living CenterBruce, MS 4 of 5
Hillview Community Living CenterDresden, TN 4 of 5
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.