Laurelwood Community Living Center
1036 West Drive, Laurel, MS 39440 · For profit - Individual · 60 certified beds · (601) 425-3191 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,788 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-10)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 29.9% | 20.5% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.4% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 1.6% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 42.4% | 19.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.9% | 23.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.5% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.6% | 6.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 20.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 2.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 84.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.2% | 27.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.1% | 15.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.60 | 2.43 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.76 | 2.86 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.6%CMS range 41.5–56.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 15.5%CMS range 10.7–18.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 75.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.2–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 48.4 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.481 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
22 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2021-04-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all parts/entities of the resident call system were functioning properly for 31 of 44 resident call systems observed. The resident call system was not monitored at the nursing station/desk and did not sound with audio signaling at the nursing station panel/board for 31 resident rooms (resident rooms 1-31). There was no facility staff observed at the nursing station/desk from 7:45 A.M. - 11:30 A.M. on 03/18/2021. The facility's failure to provide supervision and to devise appropriate monitoring and surveillance for all residents while the resident call system was malfunctioning was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The noncompliance with the monitoring and surveillance of the resident call system and the nursing station/desk subsequently constituted the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident with no documented bowel movement for six (6) consecutive days, which resulted in the resident being hospitalized on [DATE] for evaluation that included findings consistent with fecal impaction for one (1) of 14 sampled residents. Resident #25 Cross Reference F684, F656 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Notification of Changes in a Resident's Conditions or Status, undated, revealed, . It is the policy of this facility to .consult with his or her physician .changes in the resident's condition and/or status .Procedure 1. Nursing services shall be responsible for notifying the resident's attending physician when .d. There is a need to alter the resident's treatment significantly . A record review of the statement provided via the Administrator on facility letterhead dated 4/10/25 revealed the facility did not have a policy regarding constipation or bowel movements.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plan interventions for a resident with constipation and no documented bowel movements for consecutive days, which resulted in a Resident being hospitalized on [DATE] for evaluation that included findings consistent with fecal impaction for one (1) of 14 sampled residents. Resident#25 Cross Reference F580, F684 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, reviewed 10/2022 revealed, . A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: . e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions . 10. When possible, interventions address the underlying source…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to identify or respond to a clinically relevant pattern of constipation, which resulted in a resident being hospitalized on [DATE] for evaluation that included findings consistent with fecal impaction for one (1) of 14 sampled residents. Resident #25 Cross Reference F580, F656 Findings include: A record review of the statement provided via the Administrator on facility letterhead dated 4/10/25 revealed, . (Proper Name of Facility) does not have a policy for constipation or bowel movements. During a phone interview, on 04/07/25 at 02:38 PM, Resident #25's daughter explained that her mother had been hospitalized in January because she did not have a bowel movement (BM) for a week. She had to be transferred to an acute hospital in another state and was there for almost a week because her bowels were impacted. During an interview on 04/08/25 at 03:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 explained that the CNAs advise if there is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident property when staff left a controlled substance unattended, resulting in (30) Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 10-325 milligram tablets prescribed for Resident #1 being unaccounted for and lost for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1).Findings include:A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure (undated) revealed, .Policy: To provide a safe environment for all residents free of abuse.II. Types of Abuse.7. Misappropriation of Resident Property means 'the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary, or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent'. Examples.Missing prescription medications or diversion of a resident medications, including.limited to controlled substances .A review of the facility's Medication-Controlled Substances Policy and Procedure (undated) revealed .Procedure: 1.Only authorized licensed nursing and pharmacy personnel have access to controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and handled in accordance with accepted professional standards when staff failed to immediately secure controlled medications upon receipt for Resident #1 and failed to store medications according to manufacturer's instructions for Resident #3, for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents.Findings include:A review of the facility policy, Medications Storage Policy and Procedure (undated), revealed, Medications and biologicals will be maintained in a secured locations only accessible to designated staff.3. Schedule II controlled medications will be maintained within a separately locked permanently affixed compartment. Record of receipt and disposition of controlled medications will be maintained.Resident #1A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 03/03/26 with diagnoses including Fracture of Left Femur.A record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and take appropriate actions to prevent an avoidable accident when staff continued transporting a resident after the resident removed his seatbelt and staff failed to stop the transport and request assistance, resulting in the resident falling from his wheelchair inside the facility van, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, Resident #1.Findings include:A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 2/4/2025 with diagnoses including Encephalopathy. A record review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/9/25 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary score of 8, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. A record review of the facility's fall report, dated 10/13/25 at 11:45 AM, revealed Resident #1 had an incident Location of Facility Vehicle with a Predisposing Situation Factors including During Transfer.On 12/15/2025 at 9:27 AM, during an interview with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and pest-free environment in the kitchen by not ensuring effective pest control measures were implemented and sustained for two (2) of three (3) kitchen observations. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy, Sanitization (undated), revealed, .The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All kitchens, kitchen areas shall be . protected from rodents, roaches, flies, and other insects. A review of the facility's Pest Control Policy, dated 4/10/23, revealed, .Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents .6. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. On 4/7/25 at 10:02 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager, the dry goods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinence care was provided, as evidenced by the failure to cleanse the skin during a brief change for one (1) of two (2) residents observed for incontinence care (Resident #13). Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Perineal Care, revised 8/25/2014, revealed, .Procedure .5. Clean perineal area well with soap and warm water taking care to clean from front to back using a clean washcloth or clean area of the cloth for each stroke. 6. Rinse perineal area, moving from front to back using a clean area of the washcloth or towelette or use another clean washcloth or towelette for each stroke. (Note: Not all products require rinsing. Follow product instructions). 7. Dry perineal area moving from front to back. Use a blotting motion with towel. 8. Turn resident on side. 9. Clean, rinse (as applicable) and dry buttocks and perianal area without contaminating perineal area. 10. Remove wet incontinent pad or protective linen. Change gloves and perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured when a wound care treatment cart was left unlocked and unattended in a hallway for one (1) of four (4) days of the survey. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration Guidelines, revised August 25, 2014, revealed, .Procedure .2. Administration .m. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. It may be kept in the doorway of the resident's room, with open drawers facing inward and all other sides closed. No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by . On 4/9/25 at 2:14 PM, during an observation on the North Hall, a wound care treatment cart was unlocked. The cart was left unattended by Registered Nurse (RN) #1, who had entered a resident's room to perform wound care. RN #1 remained in the room with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to thaw food at the correct temperature, failed to clean the equipment according to the cleaning schedule, and failed to ensure the three compartment sinks' chemical sanitation was working appropriately to prevent possible foodborne illnesses for two (2) of four (4) dietary observations. This has a potential to affect all residents receiving meals prepared by the facility's dietary department. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Meat Cookery and Storage, from [NAME] Corporate Dietitians (Copyright ©2020), revealed, the Food and Nutrition Services Department should ensure that meat shall be prepared in a manner to preserve quality, maximize nutrient retention and to obtain maximum yield of product .Procedure: Meat which needs defrosting should be pulled three days prior to service and defrosted in a dry, cool area at 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit) or less. Larger meats, such as whole turkey may require…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the residents were able to obtain funds from their trust accounts on weekends for nine (9) of (12) Resident council members interviewed. (Residents #4, #11, #17, #18, #20, #27, #28, #30 and #31) Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Trust Fund Policy & Agreement, dated 10/7/07, revealed, .WHEREAS the resident acknowledges that he/she has been informed and understands that he/she has the right to manage his/her own financial affairs . The Facility will give the Resident due receipt for such monetary sums . During an interview on 10/16/23 at 3:30 PM, with the Resident Council members, Residents #4, 11, #17, #18, #20, #27, #28, #30 and #31 complained that they were not able to get their money from their trust fund on weekends. The residents said if they want money for the weekend, they must get it on Friday. The residents revealed that has been a problem for them, because if they wanted to order a pizza or food from Door Dash on weekends, they've unable to do so, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Council complaints were resolved in a timely manner regarding transportation to outings. This affected nine (9) of (12) Resident council members who participate in the Resident Council meetings. Residents #4, #11, #17, #18, #20, #27, #28, #30 and #31 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances and Complaints, dated 2/14/23, revealed, Social services will act as the grievance officer for the facility and oversee the grievance process. Grievance forms should be kept outside of the office, where residents, and staff members can access them at any time. All grievances will be reported to Social Services and Social Services will follow the following procedure to investigate and work to resolve the grievance . STEP 1 Upon receipt of a grievance, Social Services will complete a written report within five working days of the filed grievance and determine what corrective action, if any should be taken . STEP 2 Social services must notify the person who filed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach for one (1) of 15 sampled residents. Resident #26 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Call Light, Use of, revised 11/15/2019, revealed . It is the policy of this facility to have an adequately equipped communication system that allows residents to call for staff . Be sure all call lights are placed within reach . The facility will routinely inspect: Call lights are placed appropriately and within reach at bedside . On 10/16/23 at 11:46 AM, during an initial interview and observation with Resident #26, she explained that her call light had not been in reach many times and that occurred on all shifts. An observation revealed the call light was on the nightstand and out of reach of the resident. She stated that she has been told by staff not to yell out, but if there was an emergency, she would yell anyway. On 10/16/23 at 12:20 PM, during an observation, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 took a meal tray into Resident #26's room and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 8 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Resident's Representative (RR) of a room change for one (1) of 15 sampled residents. Resident #39 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Room Changes Policy, revised April 9, 2021, revealed, The facility will promote resident's right to make choices and to receive written notice of a room change when being relocated .When a resident is changing rooms at the request of facility staff, the resident and/or resident representative should receive written notification that contains the reason for the room change, the effective date of the change, and the location to which the resident will be moved . On 10/17/23 at 10:06 AM, a phone interview with Resident #39's RR revealed the resident was changed to a new room during his stay. The RR stated she did not know of Resident # 39's room change until she came to the facility, and the resident was not in his room. The RR reported being scared and had to look for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the Resident, or the Resident Representative (RR), written notification of the bed hold policy at the time of transfer for one (1) of 15 sampled residents. Resident #39 Findings include: A review of the facility's policy, Bedhold Policy and Procedure, undated, revealed, Before the facility transfers a resident to the hospital .written information should be provided to the resident and family member or legal representative specifying the following information .The duration of the bed-hold policy under the State plan, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the facility; and .The policies regarding bed hold periods, which should be consistent . Resident #39 On 10/17/23 at 10:09 AM, during a phone interview with the RR, she stated that she did not receive written notification of the bed hold information regarding Resident #39's recent hospitalization. A review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility's policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff assistance for showering received those services for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance. Resident #10 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Bath, Shower/Tub, dated August 25, 2014, revealed . The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident . The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL record and/or in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the shower/tub was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath . 4. How the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath. 5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken. On 10/16/23 at 12:30 PM, during an interview and observation, Resident #10 was observed in her wheelchair, with toiletry supplies in her hand. It was noted that the resident's hair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services in accordance with professional standards for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed with wounds. Resident #1 Findings Include: A review of the facility's Skin Care Process policy, dated 1/17/2018, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide care and services that meet professional standards to treat the loss of skin integrity . On 8/10/23 at 10:05 AM, during an observation of wound care for Resident #1 with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, revealed RN #1 gathered supplies including a package of gauze, spray container of wound cleanser, container of betadine, package of Alginate, and container of hand sanitizer. All items were gathered in her arms and held against her chest and in contact with her clothing. RN #1 removed and discarded the soiled dressing. She retrieved several of the gauze from the packet, touching the container, and applied wound cleanser to the gauze. She cleaned the lower wound to the abdomen by blotting up and down on and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection during wound care for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed with wounds. Resident #1 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Infection Control Program, dated 7/16/22, revealed, .The facility will establish and maintain an Infection Control Program focused on preventing the transmission of infectious disease .Purpose .Decrease the risk of infection for residents .Insure compliance with federal and state infection control guidelines . Review of the facility's policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated June 2010, revealed, .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .6. In most situations, the preferred method of hand hygiene is with an alcohol-based hand rub. IF hands are not visibly soiled, use an alcohol-based hand rub .for all of the following situations: .before handling clean or soiled dressings .after removing gloves . During an observation of wound care on 8/10/23 at 10:05 AM, for Resident #1 with Registered Nurse (RN) #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide pericare for one (1) of four (4) observations. Resident # 14. The facility policy and procedure titled Perineal Care dated August 25, 2014 revealed, cleanse the perineum to prevent infection and odor . Place call light in place and instruct resident to call for assistance, if needed. Provide privacy. Provide a clean surface. Perform hand hygiene. Put on gloves. Expose perineal area. Avoid unnecessary exposure. Clean perineal area well with soap and warm water or other cleanser taking care to clean from front to back using a clean cloth or clean area of the cloth for each stroke. Rinse perineal area, moving from front to back using a clean area of the washcloth or towelette or use another clean washcloth or towelette for each stroke. (Note: Not all products require rinsing. Follow product instructions). Dry perineal area moving from front to back. Use a blotting motion with towel. Turn resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a less than five (5) percent med error rate as evidenced by the facility failed to administer oral inhalation medication per manufactures guidelines for two (2) of three (3) medication administration observations Residents # 9 and Resident #11. Findings include: Review of the the facility's, Oral Inhalation Administration policy, dated November 1, 2008 revealed the purpose is to allow correct administration of oral inhalers to residents, and for instruction in proper techniques for those resident able to administer the medication to themselves. Have resident rinse his/her mouth and spit out the rinse water. Review of the Trelegy Ellipta Guide, dated May 2019, revealed the possible side effects of Trelegy Ellipta can cause serious side effects including: fungal infection in your mouth or throat (thrush). Rinse your mouth with water without swallowing after using Trelegy Ellipta to help…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based of observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to remove expired food items from the food pantry and failed to monitor the freezer temperature for one 1 of four 4 observations. Findings include: The facility's policy, Food Storage, dated 8/18/2011, revealed the Policy Statement: It is the policy of the facility that food storage areas be maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner .4. Frozen foods shall be stored at minus 18 degrees Celsius (0) degrees Fahrenheit) or below at all times. There is an accurate thermometer in each refrigerator and freezer and in store rooms used for perishable foods. Observation on 3/16/21 at 10:20 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, with the Dietary Manager, revealed the freezer thermometer could not be located by the Dietary Manager in the freezer. During the tour State Agency (SA) found a 32 ounce French's Dijon Mustard with an expiration date of 10/5/20 and a box of 500 yellow mustard in individual packs with an expiration date of 2/23/21. On 03/16/21 at 10:40 AM, in an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,788 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,788 — penalty dated 2025-04-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-07 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRIGHT, DOUGLAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2000 |
| COMMUNITY LIVING CENTERS, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2000 |
| COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2000 |
| LEONE, BRENDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/03/2025 |
| MAULDIN, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/27/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $999K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Mississippi Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 255262. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.