Renaissance Terrace

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 41.3 residents a day — about 32% occupied, or roughly 89 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility admission agreement review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to timely disburse resident refunds due the responsible party for 1 resident (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for resident funds. The findings include: Review of the admission agreement dated [DATE], revealed .Refunds due to you .If you are discharged or transferred, we will refund you any credit balance minus any outstanding private insurance balance within a reasonable time not to exceed thirty (30) days after we have applied such balances towards outstanding fees for services provided by us . Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Unspecified Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, and Metabolic Encephalopathy. Review of the medical and financial records for Resident #6 revealed the responsible party for Resident #6 was listed on the admission documents, admission face sheet, financial records, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an Online Professional Journal review, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow established clinical guidelines related to urinary catheterization of using silicone coated latex urinary catheters in persons with known latex allergies for 1 resident (Resident #9) of 8 residents reviewed for urinary catheters.The findings include: Review of the Clinical Standards of Practice as Published in the Online Professional Journal titled Urology and Continence Care Today, dated 2/2026, with an article titled .Best Practice in the use of indwelling catheterization . revealed .Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE, a type of silicone) coated catheters .These are latex catheters coated in PTFE, which is smoother than latex and can be useful in reducing encrustation and discomfort for the wearer .There is still risk of latex allergy and, therefore, PTFE coated catheters must be avoided in patients with a known allergy or sensitivity . Medical record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms and hallways in good repair and in a homelike environment for 18 resident rooms (#23, #8, #21, #20, #27, #100, #30, #9, #101, #18, #5, #32, #31, #102, #103, #104, #13, #38, #10, #105, #106, and #14) of 34 rooms observed of 37 total rooms and 3 of 4 hallways observed which affected 22 residents. The findings include: During an environment tour of 4 Halls and 37 rooms on, 8/28/2023 starting at 10:00 AM and ending at 12:00 PM, the following concerns were observed: room [ROOM NUMBER]A (Resident #23) was observed to have scratched/gouged/scuffed walls and missing paint. room [ROOM NUMBER]B (Resident #8) was observed to have a dirty privacy curtain with circular brown stains. room [ROOM NUMBER]A (Resident #21) was observed to have scuffed walls and cracked sheet rock around the air conditioner (A/C) unit. room [ROOM NUMBER]A (Resident #20) was observed to have large scratches in the dry wall and missing paint on the wall over the bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0641 — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 19 residents (Resident #8, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #27, #30, #31, #32, #37, #38, and #39) for use of side rails, 2 residents (Resident #11 and #23) for dental needs, 2 residents (Resident #11 and #30) for respiratory care, and 1 resident (Resident #21) for significant weight loss of 19 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The findings include: Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual dated 10/2019, showed .The RAI process has multiple regulatory requirements .the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status .a registered nurse conducts or coordinates each assessment with the appropriate participation of health professionals .the assessment process includes direct observation, as well as communication with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespread
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a person-centered activities program which affected 4 of 4 residents (Resident #5, #19, #23, and #36) reviewed for activities which had the potential to affect all 40 residents in the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Life Connection Program, dated 3/2023, showed .Life connections programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident .the life connections program is ongoing and includes facility-organized group activities, independent individual activities, and assisted individual activities .activities are scheduled 7 days per week .scheduled activities are posted on the resident bulletin board .activity scheduled are also provided individually . Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease and Hypothyroidism. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide person-centered activities for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #5, #19, #23, and #36) reviewed for activities and 3 of 4 residents (Resident #5, #19, and #36) reviewed for communal dining service which had the potential to affect all 40 residents present in facility. The findings include: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease and Hypothyroidism. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 8/29/2023 at 3:20 PM, Resident #5 stated he did not know what or when activities were occurring, there were no consistent out of room activities, and the last BINGO group activity was over 2 weeks ago due to the lack of sufficient staff. Resident #5 also stated the dining room had been closed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure frozen food products were labeled and dated appropriately while stored in 1 of 2 freezers observed which had the potential to affect all 40 residents of the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated 7/24/2023, showed .Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices .All food stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date) .Functioning of the refrigeration and food temperatures will be monitored at designated intervals throughout the day by the food and nutrition services manager or designee according to state-specific requirements . During the initial kitchen tour observation on 8/28/2023 at 10:45 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) #1 showed the vertical freezer had items without labels or opened/use by dates. A zip-locked pack (transferred from original packaging) of 4 pork-chops was noted without proper labeling of contents, date opened, or use by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, review of Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) documents, and interview, the facility's QAPI committee failed to monitor, implement appropriate plans to correct, and track the identified concerns related to a homelike environment with resident rooms being in disrepair and the use of side (bed) rails to ensure routine/scheduled maintenance assessments were completed which had the potential to affect all 40 residents of the facility. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement, undated, showed .the facility will implement and maintain a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program .The program should address all systems of care and management practices while emphasizing safety .The primary purpose .is to identify and analyze actual or potential quality issues .and implement appropriate plans to improve performance .The minutes of the monthly QAPI meeting will be reviewed with the Medical Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-20 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure routine and regular scheduled side rail assessments were completed to identify the risk of entrapment for 19 residents (Resident #8, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #27, #30, #31, #32, #37, #38, and #39) of 19 residents reviewed for side rail assessments. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Rails, dated 5/10/2017, showed .A side rail assessment screen is completed on each resident upon admission, quarterly, and as needed .The assessment and documentation .includes .measuring the gaps between the rail(s) themselves and the gaps between the bed-rail and the mattress .Inspection by maintenance staff of all beds and related equipment as part of our regular bed safety program to identify risks and problems including potential entrapment risks . Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Speech and Language Deficits,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #11) for dental concerns of 16 residents reviewed for dental concerns, and for 2 residents (Resident #13 and #14) for use of bed/side rails of 19 residents reviewed. The facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 1 resident (Resident #38) related to identifying and documenting behaviors and side effects of psychotropic medications of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility also failed to implement the comprehensive care plan related to falls for 1 resident (Resident #27) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan-Comprehensive, undated, showed .It is the policy of this facility to develop comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives .to meet the resident's medical, nursing .needs .The comprehensive care plan had been designed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COMMUNITY ELDERCARE SERVICES — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN