Willow Tree Care Center
2050 S Main St, Delta, CO 81416 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (970) 874-9773 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,756 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 33.5% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.5% | 1.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.5% | 8.8% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.5% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.2% | 13.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.7% | 11.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.5% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.8% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.8% | 1.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 4.8% | 20.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.1% | 12.1% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.00 | 1.38 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.42 | 1.74 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 36.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.1%CMS range 46.8–69.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.0–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 36.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 7.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 11.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 3.9–15.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 54.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.75 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from physical abuse for two (#33 and #20) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 37 sample residents.Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of a traumatic brain injury (TBI), altered mental status, other specified disorders of the brain, unspecified dementia of unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, alcohol-induced persisting dementia and delirium due to known physiological condition.On 11/15/25 the facility initiated an aggression care plan for Resident #42 which identified that the resident was physically and/or verbally aggressive with staff and residents at times due to poor impulse control, dementia and history of TBI. Pertinent interventions, (initiated 11/15/26) directed staff to maintain a safe environment for Resident #42 and others, observing and evaluating the times of day, places, circumstances, potential triggers and what helped redirect his behavior and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#5) of two residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards or practice out of 37 sample residents.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (total paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness affecting one side of the body) affecting the left side.On 2/2/26 Resident #5 was being transferred by licensed practical nurse (LPN) #1 and certified nurse aide (CNA) #3 using the sit-to-stand lift. The resident let go of the handle of the lift, resulting in her left arm getting hung up in the lift sling in an awkward position. Resident #5 was lowered back to her bed and was found to have no bruising at the time to her left arm. According to staff, the resident did not express pain, but typically had difficulties expressing pain, so the nurse administered acetaminophen (Tylenol) to the resident for pain after the incident. The facility failed to notify the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff were prepared for a potential threat of fire. The lack of preparation resulted in residents scared, anxious, removed from their beds at night, placed outside in parking lots with smoke filled air, and for some, without supplemental oxygen as needed during a facility wide evacuation on 9/23/22. The lack in preparation for a potential emergent threat, included the failure to have a complete and thorough emergency preparedness training program, specifically fire training, to identify when residents should be evacuated and when residents should be placed behind closed fire doors. According to interviews with management the staff panicked and overreacted. The absence of adequate training, resulted in a chaotic situation as identified by a resident family member, referring to the evacuation on 9/23/22. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to consistently provide catheter care, treatment and services to minimize the risk of urinary tract infections for two (#11 and #16) of two reviewed for catheter care out of three residents with catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11's urinary catheter down drain bag was kept from dragging on the floor and the urinary catheter bag was kept below the bladder. There were no physician orders on how to clean the area around the suprapubic catheter site. Due to the facility's failures, Resident # 11 suprapubic urinary catheter line to drag on the floor and no order to cleanse the site, contributed to an infection as evidenced by the purulent (pus) drainage from the catheter exit site which caused pain to the resident. In addition, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #16 was provided catheter care assistance with emptying her catheter bag and monitoring catheter fluid level to ensure timely empting of her catheter bag;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#12, #28 and #34) of six out of 26 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and to maintain their highest level of physical well being. Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and diabetes. The resident was placed in hospice care on 7/8/22. The resident was weighed on 5/3/22 and again on 5/4/22 at 2:33 p.m., at 100.7 pounds (lbs). Then the resident was not weighed again until 8/1/22 and she was 99.2 lbs, and the last recorded weight was on 9/2/22 at 9:58 a.m. at 92.5 lbs., a loss of 6.7 lbs, which was a 6.5% weight loss over one month considered significant. The resident did not receive a nutritional assessment either after admission or after she sustained a severe weight loss. An intervention of Ensure was recommended on 9/16/22, however the facility did not implement it, until 9/18/22. In addition, the facility failed to: -Address Resident #28's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen, main dining room and secured memory unit. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff followed accepted hand hygiene practices during the meal service.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to The Colorado Retail Food Regulations (3/16/24), retrieved on 3/9/26, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation, including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: after touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of arms; after using the toilet room; after coughing, sneezing, using a handkerchief or disposable tissue; using tobacco products, eating, or drinking; after handling soiled equipment or utensils; during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of certified nurse aides at least once every 12 months and to provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for three of three certified nurse aides (CNAs).Specifically, the facility failed to complete annual performance reviews and/or provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews for CNA #3, CNA #6 and CNA #7.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe All Staff In-Service Training policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the regional corporate resource on 2/27/26 at 10:22 a.m. It read in pertinent part, All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education, including all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreements, and volunteers. The primary objective of the in-service training is to ensure that staff are able to interact in a manner that enhances the residents' quality of life and quality of care and can demonstrate competency in the topic areas of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive and at an appetizing temperature. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents were served warm food that was appetizing.Findings include:I. Resident interviewsResident #2 was interviewed on 2/23/26 at 11:36 a.m. Resident #2 said the food was always cold when it got to his room. He said a lot of the food the facility served was tasteless.Resident #2 was interviewed again on 2/23/26 at 1:03 p.m., after he was provided his lunch on a room tray. He said the meal was cold. He said most of the meals were cold. He said he had complained to the nurses, the certified nurse aides (CNA), the dietary staff and the registered dietitian (RD) but the food continued to be cold. Resident #45 was interviewed on 2/23/26 at 2:40 p.m. Resident #45 said her food was frequently cold.Resident #18 was interviewed on 2/23/26 at 1:14 p.m. Resident #18 said her lunch today (2/23/26) was tasteless because it lacked seasoning. She said it tasted like institutional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff performed appropriate hand hygiene when assisting residents with eating; and,-Ensure residents were offered the opportunity for hand hygiene prior to eating.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers, retrieved on 3/9/26 from https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety/index.html, It read in pertinent part, CDC provides the following recommendations for hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Know when to clean your hands: immediately before touching a patient; before performing an aseptic task such as placing an indwelling device or handling invasive medical devices; before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident's representative when a change in condition occurred for one (#5) of two residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to notify Resident #5's representative when the resident experienced a significant change in physical condition after bruising appeared to her left temple, as well as bruising and new pain to her left arm and shoulder following an incident that occurred during a sit-to-stand lift transfer.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Change In A Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the regional corporate resource on 2/27/26 at 2:45 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: the resident is involved in any accident or incident that results in an injury including injuries of an unknown source; there is a significant change in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received notification of changes in eligibility for Medicare or Medicaid covered services, what the resident's financial responsibility may be, and their appeal rights for three (#59, #60 and #61) of four residents out of 37 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #59, Resident #60 and Resident #61 were provided with notices of Medicare Non-Coverage when their skilled nursing benefits ended. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/3/26 at 9:58 a.m. via email. According to the NHA, the facility did not have a policy for beneficiary notices, but used the regulations as their guidance. The notice of Medicare Non-Coverage form read in pertinent part, Your Medicare provider and/or health plan have determined that Medicare probably will not pay for your current services after the effective date (indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property for three (#7, #22 and #57) of eight residents reviewed for personal property out of 37 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to prevent the loss of property for Resident #7, Resident #22, and Resident #57 from their rooms.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureIdentifying Exploitation, Theft and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy and procedure, revised April 2021, was provided by the regional corporate resource on 2/27/26 at 12:14 p.m. It read in pertinent part, As part of the Abuse Prevention Strategy, volunteers, employees and contractors hired by the facility are expected to be able to recognize exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Exploitation, theft and misappropriation of resident property are strictly prohibited. It is understood by the leadership in this facility that preventing these occurrences requires staff education and training. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level I screening from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents without serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#7) of three residents reviewed for PASRR out of 37 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to follow the recommendation to re-evaluate Resident #7's PASRR level I screening if the resident's symptoms or behavior did not improve or resolve within 60 days of the screening.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Admissions policy, revised March 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/2/26 at 12:28 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. The facility conducts a Level I PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#4) of three residents out of 37 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to follow the physician ordered parameters for the administration of Resident #4's pain medication.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to Fundamentals of Nursing 10th edition by [NAME] and [NAME] et. al, 2021 pp. 672,1063-1064, Responsibilities of medication administration include knowing medication therapeutics, assessing a patient before administration, calculating doses, administering medications using the seven rights, monitoring and evaluating medication effects, and assessing a patient's ability to self-administer medications. The seven rights of medication administration include the right medication, right dose, right patient, right route, right time, right documentation, and right indication. Studies of nurses' attitudes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents or hazards for one (#42) of six residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent an elopement for Resident #42 on 1/15/26. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Wandering and Elopement policy, revised March 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/26 at 1:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. If a resident is identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. II. Facility investigationThe facility's investigation was provided by the NHA on 2/24/26 at 5:18 p.m. The facility's investigation identified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of medications for two of four medication storage carts. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Date residents' insulin pens with the date they were opened; and,-Discard expired medications in a timely manner.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the manufacturer, Sanofi-Aventis, Prescribing and Safety information, revised May 2025, retrieved on 3/4/26 from https://products.sanofi.us/Lantus/Lantus.pdf. The 3 milliliter (ml) single-patient use SoloStar prefilled pen can be stored unopened in a refrigerator until the expiration date, stored unopened at room temperature for 28 days and used for 28 days after opened at room temperature.According to the manufacturer, Sanofi-Aventis, Prescribing and Safety information, September 2025, retrieved on 3/4/26 from https://www.novolog.com/taking-novolog.html, Store unused NovoLog pens, PenFill cartridges, and vials at room temperature up to 86 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for up to 28 days. Store unused NovoLog pens and vials in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) received at least 12 hours of annual in-service training that also included dementia management training and resident abuse prevention training to ensure continued competence for two out of five certified nurse aides (CNA) reviewed.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure CNA #3 and CNA #4 received 12 hours of continuing education annually.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe All Staff In-Service Training policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the regional corporate resource on 2/27/26 at 10:22 a.m. It read in pertinent part, All staff are required to participate in regular in-service education, including all new and existing personnel, individuals providing services under contractual agreements, and volunteers. Training requirements will be met prior to staff providing services to residents, annually, and as necessary based on the facility assessment. Based on the outcome of the assessment, additional training may be required.Completed training will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#3, #4, #7 and #8) of eight residents out of 10 sample residents were free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Prevent physical abuse between Resident #3 and Resident #4;- Protect Resident #7 from physical abuse by Resident #9; and,- Protect Resident #8 from physical abuse by Resident #4. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention policy, last revised April 2021, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/23/25 at 5:12 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for one (#4) of seven residents out of 10 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate two allegations of physical abuse by Resident #4. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Investigating and Reporting policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/23/25 at 5:12 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The administrator initiates investigations.Investigations may be assigned to an individual trained in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident diagnosed with dementia, received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two (#4 and #6) of seven residents reviewed out of 10 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Effectively implement person-centered approaches for dementia care to prevent resident-to-resident altercations for Resident #4; and, -Effectively implement person-centered approaches for dementia care to prevent verbal and physical aggressive behavior as well as wandering/elopement behavior for Resident #6.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Dementia Clinical Protocol policy and procedure, revised November 2018, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/23/25 at 5:12 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, For the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT (interdisciplinary team) will identify a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents out of three sample residents received treatment and care for optimal skin condition of a pressure wound, in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Develop and implement a care plan for Resident #1's pressure ulcers; and, -Ensure interventions were implemented timely to prevent the development and worsening of a pressure injury for Resident #1. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the All [NAME] Tissue Viability Nurse Forum, Best Practice Statement on the Prevention and Management of Moisture Lesions, September 2023, retrieved online 4/4/25 from:chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.wwic.[NAME]/uploads/files/documents/Professionals/Clinical%20Partners/AWTVNF/All_Wales-Moisture_Lesions_final_final.pdf Individuals with incontinence may also have problems with mobility and, as a result, be at risk of developing pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-25 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representative were aware of the nature and implications of the facility's arbitration agreement to inform their decision on whether or not to enter into such agreements for six residents (#21, #22, #36, #42, #43 and #46) of six out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Thoroughly explain the binding arbitration agreement in a form and in a manner to ensure residents and/or resident representatives understood the agreement before signing the arbitration agreement; -Accurately inform residents and/or resident representatives when the agreement could be rescinded before the agreement was signed; and, -Ensure staff reviewing the arbitration agreement with residents and the residents' representatives understood the components of the agreement. Findings include: I. The Arbitration Agreement The Voluntarily Executed Mutual Arbitration Agreement, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure care for residents was provided in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced the residents' dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -The residents in the dining room did not have prolonged wait times of 30 minutes or longer for their meal to be served; and, -Room trays were delivered to all neighborhoods and served to the residents at the regular posted meal times. Finding include: I. Posted meal times Meal times were posted across the facility as the following: Breakfast at 8:00 a.m. Lunch at 12:00 p.m. Dinner at 5:00 p.m. II. Observations On 1/22/24 at 11:50 a.m., three residents were in the dining room waiting for lunch. -At 12:21 p.m. the first meal went to [NAME] Halls. -At 12:53 p.m. East Halls still had yet to be served their trays. -At 1:11 p.m. the meal cart was placed in the East Halls and the certified nurse aide (CNA) started serving C Wing first. -At 1:24 p.m. the meal cart went to the East Hall to serve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances in the resident council meeting. Specifically, the facility failed to document and respond to the resident council's grievances over the past four months regarding nursing care and dietary concerns. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Filling Grievances or Complaints policy, revised April 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/25/24 at 10:40 a.m. read in pertinent: Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff. -Any resident, family member or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior fo other residents, staff members, theft of property or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. -Grievances may also be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. -All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure freedom from resident-to-resident abuse involving four (#33, #201, #21 and #41) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Investigate and implement measures to prevent altercations between Resident #33 and Resident #201 on 2/20/23 and 6/7/23; -Prevent resident-to-resident abuse involving Resident #33 and Resident #201 on 8/6/23, 8/16/23 and 9/16/23; and, -Prevent resident-to-resident abuse involving Resident #21 and #41 on 1/18/24. Findings include: I. Facility policies The Resident Abuse Prevention policy, revised August 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/22/24 at 9:00 a.m. and read in pertinent part: The community will not tolerate any form of abuse, neglect or exploitation of our residents. This policy is to assure that allegations of abuse, neglect or exploitation are identified, investigated, reported, documented and followed up with interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable, attractive at the appropriate temperatures and met the nutritional needs of the residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' food was palatable in taste, texture and appearance. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #11 was interviewed on 1/22/24 at 12:15 p.m. He said the food was not good. He said he did not like the food the facility prepared. He said if cauliflower was served it was just cauliflower stems and they were tough. He said he loved over-easy eggs but received scrambled eggs a lot. Resident #11 said he started buying personal food to eat when he was served something he did not like. Resident #9 was interviewed on 1/22/24 at 2:34 p.m. She said she ate in her room and meals were getting served later and later. She said hot foods and cold foods were lukewarm by the time they were served to the halls. She said the dessert was usually an individual ice cream and was usually melted by the time it was served in the rooms.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for one (#11) of three residents reviewed for bathing preferences out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #11 was offered showers twice a week on the resident's scheduled and preferred days; -Ensure Resident #11 had opportunities to refuse showers at the time the shower was offered but still had a shower available to him on his preferred day and scheduled day or shortly after; and, -Ensure Resident #11 could choose between showers and the resident's preference to attend activities of choice without losing a shower opportunity. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident Rights policy, undated, was provided by the facility on 1/25/24. According to the policy, residents have the right for self-determination. The Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting policy, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to complete a Level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for one (#19) of two residents reviewed for PASARR out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Level I preadmission screening was completed for Resident #19 who had a mental disorder present when admitted to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy The PASARR policy was requested on 1/25/24 from the nursing home administrator (NHA) and the NHA said the facility did not have a PASARR policy. II. Resident status Resident #19, over the age of 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2024 computerized physician orders, diagnoses included diabetes, multiple sclerosis, cognitive communication disorder, epilepsy and bipolar disorder. The 11/3/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident required partial assistance from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide person-centered dementia care and services for two (#21 and #41) of five residents reviewed for dementia care out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide dementia care services for Residents #21 and #41 to provide their highest practicable quality of life and care; -Address behaviors, prevent resident-to-resident altercation; and, -Ensure appropriate and non-pharmacological approaches were provided by staff to engage residents with life in the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dementia Clinical Protocol policy, revised November 2018, was received by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/25/24 at 7:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part, For the individual with confirmed dementia, the facility will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize the remaining function and quality of life. Direct care staff will support the resident in initiating and completing activities and tasks of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs that accommodated resident allergies, intolerances and preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Offer residents more options for alternative choices to the main meal; -Honor requests for items indicated on the alternative menu; and, -Offer the main dish sides with the alternative menu choice. Findings include: I. Resident interviews Resident #16 was interviewed on 1/22/24 at 2:55 p.m. She said the facility mainly served Mexican-styled food and she did not want that. She said the alternative meals were sandwiches and were usually served on stale bread. II. Resident group interview The resident group was interviewed on 1/23/24 at 1:42 p.m. with Resident #6, Resident #9, Resident #4, Resident #17, Resident #12 and Resident #13. Resident #17, Resident #4, Resident #12 and Resident #9 said if the residents wanted something else to eat off the bistro menu the staff got mad and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a copy of medical records were provided timely for one (#20) of three residents out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medical records were provided timely upon request to Resident #20's representative. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Release of Information policy, revised November 2009, was provided by the facility on 1/25/24. The policy read in part: Closed or thinned medical records were maintained in the medical records department and were available only by authorized personnel. Authorized personnel included but were not necessarily limited to nursing personnel; physician; consultant; support services; administration; government agencies; and/or, resident/representative. The resident may initiate a request to release such information contained in his or her records and charts to anyone he or she wishes. Such request will be honored only upon the receipt of a written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative. The resident may have access to his or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the services provided met professional standards of quality for two residents (#20 and #47) reviewed out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #20 was thoroughly assessed and monitored for injury and safety after the resident spilled a potential hot beverage on herself; and, -Ensure Resident #47 was consistently assessed when she was having a change of condition. Findings include: I. Resident #20 A. Facility policy The Safety of Hot Liquids, revised October 2014, was provided by the facility on 1/25/24. According to the policy, residents would be evaluated for safety concerns and potential injury from hot liquids upon emission, readmission and on change of condition. Appropriate precautions will be implemented to maximize choice of beverages while minimizing the potential for injury. The policy read in part: Potential for burns from hot liquids is considered an ongoing concern among residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment which included all resources, staff education, staff competencies, and facility based risk assessments. Findings include: I. Record review The facility assessment was last reviewed on 4/8/22 by the nursing home administrator (NHA), director of nurses, and the interdisciplinary team. The facility assessment failed to include the following: -Include staff competencies that were necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population or include the staff training program to ensure any training needs are met for all new and existing staff; -Include staff trainings/education necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for the resident population; -Identify facility resources needed to provide competent resident support during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and implement an effective system to identify facility concerns or address need for quality improvement in their QAPI program. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, updated February 2020, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 9/26/22. The policy documented in pertinent part, This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven qapi program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. The objectives of the QAPI program are to: -Provide a means to measure current and potential indicators…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-05 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employ an infection control preventionist (ICP) who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control which had the potential to affect all 36 residents, including four who were currently on antibiotic therapy currently residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Specifically, the facility failed to have a qualified ICP involved with the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 9/23/22; retrieved on 10/6/22, from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control- recommendations.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2 F2019-ncov%2Fhcp%2Flong-term-care.html; read in pertinent part; This guidance is applicable to all U.S.settings where healthcare is delivered (including nursing homes). Nursing homes: Assign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received notices orally and in writing which included a written description of their legal rights. Specifically, the facility failed to post a list of names, addresses and telephone numbers of all pertinent State Agencies in the facility. Findings include: I. Group interview The group interview was conducted on 9/28/22 at 1:35 p.m. The group consisted of six alert and oriented residents selected by the facility. All six residents (#3, #16, #20, #22, #31 and #33) said they did not know where the facility posted information in regard to pertinent State Agencies' contact information. II. Observations Observations throughout the building revealed there was a posting which was located to the right of the front door. The posting was approximately five feet and five inches inside a glass case. The print was between a 12 and 14 font. The phone number to the State Survey Agency was incorrect and no email address was provided. Although there were mailing addresses and telephone numbers of pertinent State Agencies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available, maintain records of grievances and complaints, or to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident(s) may have had. Specifically the facility failed to ensure: -Resident group grievances were resolved; and, -Individual resident grievances were resolved; Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance and Complaints policy and procedure, revised in April 2017, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 10/4/22 at 10:30 am, read in pertinent part, All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective actions will be taken to resolve the grievance(s). Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations. The investigation and report will include, as applicable, date & time of the incident, circumstances and location of the incident, the witnesses, the residents and the employees account of the incident, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data assessment (MDS) accurately reflected the residents' status for four (#5, #26, #33 and #34) of 12 out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS for Resident #5, #26, #33 and #34 were completed accurately to include their dental status. Findings include: I. Resident #5 A. Resident status Resident #5, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physicians orders (CPO), the diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis lower body), cognitive communication deficit, age related physical debility, repeated falls, and unsteadiness on feet. The 9/21/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 14 out of 15. She had no behaviors and did not reject care. Section L (Dental) documented Resident #5 did not have mouth or facial pain, discomfort or difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their chosen activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for two (#9 and #12) of five out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Offer and provide personalized activity programs for Resident #12 and Resident #9; and, -Offer evening and activity outings. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities Program policy, effective 9/1/14, was received from the director of nurses on 10/3/22 at 4:23 p.m. It was documented in the pertinent part, The community will encourage participation in independent or self-driven activities, as well as offer activities at least three times per week. II. Resident #12 A. Resident status Resident #12, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#3 and #5) of three residents with limited mobility reviewed for range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion, out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to establish a consistent restorative nursing program within the facility to ensure Resident #5 and Resident #3 did not have a potential decline in activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: I. Facility policy The Restorative Nursing Services policy, revised July 2017, provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 9/29/22 at 4:05 p.m., read in pertinent part: Restorative nursing care consists of nursing intervention that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services (physical, occupational or speech therapies). Restorative goals and objectives are individualized, resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, for three residents (#7, #12 and #26) of eight residents reviewed out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #7 had oxygen in her portable tank for mobility and readily available in an event of an emergency; -Ensure Resident #7 was placed on correct order setting for oxygen via nasal cannula; -Ensure Resident #12 had a physician order for specific nasal cannula oxygen requirements and for titration of oxygen requirements; and, -Ensure Resident #26 had a physician order for oxygen. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Oxygen Concentrator policy, effective 9/1/19, was provided by the activity director (AD) on 9/28/22 at 4:00 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: This document sets forth general information and guidelines in regards to delivering oxygen to a resident using an oxygen concentrator. Once…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills to ensure the residents received the care and services they required as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff which considered the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment, resident census and daily care required by the residents. Cross-reference F689 accident hazards, F692 nutrition, and F744 dementia care. Findings include: I. Resident census and conditions According to the 9/26/22 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, the resident census was 36 and the following care needs were identified: -23 residents needed assistance of one or two staff with bathing and seven residents were dependent. Three residents were independent. -13 residents needed assistance of one or two staff members for toilet use and six residents were dependent; 15 residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY V. Resident #30 A. Resident status Resident #30, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the October 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included repeated falls, Parkinson's disease, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care. According to the 8/27/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was not conducted. According to the staff assessment for mental status, the resident had severe impairment for making decisions regarding tasks of daily life. Resident #30 had a short and long term memory problem. The assessment identified the resident displayed inattention and disorganized thinking. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #30 required limited assistance of one person for dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. He required supervision with set up for bed mobility transfers and eating. According to the MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY II. Resident #4 A. Resident status Resident #4, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September computerized physicians orders (CPO), the diagnoses included unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. The 6/20/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed, the resident had cognitive impairment with a brief mental status score (BIMS) of four out of 15. He had inattention and disorganized thinking. He required supervision with dressing and was independent with all other activities of daily living (ADL). He had no behaviors and did not reject care. He wandered daily which placed him at risk of getting into a potentially dangerous place. He received anti anxiety medication daily. B. Record review The anti-anxiety medication care plan, revised 6/20/22, documented the resident used the medication for adjustment issues, anxiety, and periods of agitation. Pertinent interventions listed were to administer medications as ordered by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of Coronavirus (COVID-19) and infection for one out of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff cleaned high-touch surfaces in resident rooms and follow manufacturer surface contact time during routine daily cleaning; -Ensure housekeeping staff followed the appropriate procedure when cleaning resident rooms and bathrooms; and, -Implement appropriate hand hygiene with glove changes. Findings include: I. Professional standards The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) Preparing for COVID-19 in Nursing Homes, updated 11/15/21, retrieved on 10/11/22 from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/disinfecting-building-facility.html/, revealed in part: For environmental cleaning and disinfection: develop a schedule for regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-05 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all staff had current abuse and dementia care training. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure five out of five licensed nurses and CNAs reviewed within the previous year received dementia management training and abuse prevention training. Findings include: I. Record review Staff annual training for the selected nursing staff (CNAs and licensed nurses) were requested from the director of nursing on 10/3/22 at approximately 2:30 p.m. The facility was unable to provide the annual training which included, abuse, neglect and exploitation training and dementia care training. II. Staff interview The director of nurses was interviewed on 10/5/22 at 9:00 a.m. She said she did not have the training records and competency checklists. She said the assistant director of nursing (ADON) was no longer employed and she could not find the employee training logs and competency checklists. The DON said the abuse training and dementia training was completed on a computerized program, however, no logs could be found for completion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received the required number of annual in-service training hours to ensure continued competence for four of four staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNA) #1, #5, #8 and #9 received 12 hours of continuing education annually. Findings include: I. Record review Staff annual 12 hour training for the selected nursing staff CNA #1, #5, #8 and #9 were requested from the director of nursing on 10/3/22 at approximately 2:30 p.m. The facility was unable to provide the annual training which included abuse, neglect and exploitation training and dementia care training, nutrition, accident hazards, emergency preparedness and dignity. II. Interviews The director of nurses was interviewed on 10/4/22 at 4:00 p.m. She said she did not have the training records and competency checklists. She said the assistant director of nursing (ADON) was no longer employed and she could not find the employee training logs and competency checklists. She said that she was actively alerting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote resident dignity and respect one resident (#16) out of 12 residents reviewed for dignity out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #16 treated and spoken to in a dignified manner; and, -Ensure Resident #16's bodily privacy was maintained and personal space respected. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dignity policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/3/22 at 4:23 p.m. via email. The policy read in part: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. Residents' private space and property are respected at all times. Staff speak respectively to residents at all times, including them and dressing them by name. Staff promote, maintain and protect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to fully ensure residents had the right to formulate advance directives by not keeping advance directives updated and current for two (#12 and #27) out of 16 residents reviewed for advance directives out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #12 had the proper legal representation in the record and the medical orders for scope of treatment (MOST) form, the facility utilized for advance directives, was signed appropriately; and -Ensure Resident #27's physician order matched her wishes as signed on the MOST. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Colorado Advance Directives Consortium, Guidance for Health Care Professionals website, dated [DATE], retrieved on [DATE] from http://www.coloradoadvancedirectives.com/wp-content/uploads/[DATE]-MOST-Booklet-REV-2015.pdf read in pertinent part, If the individual resides in a nursing facility, the facility staff are responsible for keeping the MOST form updated. Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#17 and #31) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 26 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17 and #31 were kept free from abuse by Resident #4. Cross-reference F744, dementia care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse and Neglect policy, revised September 2018, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 9/29/22 at 4:05 p.m. It documented the following, in pertinent part, Every resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse; corporal punishment; neglect; explotation; involuntary seclusion; and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms or conditions. The administrator was responsible for the oversight and implementation of the Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Prohibition and Prevention Program. If the allegation involved another resident, the residents were separated, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to act upon recommendations by the pharmacist in a timely manner, based on medication regimen review (MRR) for two (#28 and #34) of six reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure response to pharmacist recommendations for: -Resident #28, a discontinue order for diazepam (anti anxiety medication) and an order for serum creatinine laboratory (lab) level was not drawn as requested; and, -Resident #34, failed to ensure the drug regimen review was acted upon in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Unnecessary Medications policy and procedure, last revised 4/9/07, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 9/29/22 at 4:05 p.m. It read in pertinent part: The facility must evaluate the resident, the resident's medication regimen and if necessary consult with the resident's physician: when an irregularity is identified in the pharmacist's monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for one (#9) of five residents reviewed for immunizations out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) to Resident #9. Findings include: I. Professional standard According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2020, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf (10/6/2022), the routine pneumococcal vaccination for adults aged 65 years or older and were immunocompetent, one dose of PPSV23 should be administered. II. Record review A. Resident #9 Resident #9, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lack of blood oxygen).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,756 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $28,756 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STELLAR SENIOR LIVING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- BLACKROCK INC — investment firm · 7.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- FLAT FOOTED LLC — investment firm · 9.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- ABP TRUST — REIT · 9.67% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- VANGUARD GROUP INC — investment firm · 8.35% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- H/2 SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES IV L.P. — investment firm · 6.20% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- D.E. SHAW & CO., L.P. — investment firm · 5.73% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- SPTIHS PROPERTIES TRUST — REIT · 10.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTIHS PROPERTIES TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2020 |
| CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/22/2024 |
| D.E. SHAW & CO., L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/22/2024 |
| DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2020 |
| H/2 SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES IV L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/22/2024 |
| SNH PROJ LINCOLN TRS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2024 |
| SNH TRS LICENSEE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2020 |
| SNH TRS, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2020 |
| BILOTTO, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| PORTNOY, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| BROWN, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| CLARK, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| ABP TRUST | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| BLACKROCK INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| FLAT FOOTED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| STELLAR SENIOR LIVING B LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| STELLAR V LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| STELLAR WILLOW TREE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/27/2025 |
| VANGUARD GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| BENTON, EVRETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2021 |
| PULSIPHER, KEVIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| WADDELL, KELLIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/23/2024 |
| WOOD, MELISSA K. | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 59 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065249. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.