No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mantey Heights Rehabilitation & Care Center

2825 Patterson Rd, Grand Junction, CO 81506 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 88 certified beds · (970) 242-7356 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (970) 242-7356 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)7 actual-harm citations$117,284 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 7 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $117,284 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
603 28 1/4 Rd · (970) 263-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Safeway0.8 mi
2901 F Rd · (970) 248-9869 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.9 mi
2901 F Rd · (970) 248-9869 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2856 Patterson Rd · (970) 254-3846 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2845 Faith Lane · (970) 245-3755

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.2%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%4.7%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.9%0.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.8%1.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.1%8.8%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.9%13.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.9%11.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.6%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.8%20.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.7%75.6%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.881.381.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.841.741.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.7–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
58.3%
Total nursing turnover
73.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 68.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-19)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

55 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#9 and #65) of four residents reviewed for nutrition out of 46 sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and maintain their highest level practicable physical well-being. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility for long-term care on 11/6/15 with diagnoses of unspecified disorder of psychological development, cerebral palsy, and cerebellar ataxia (difficulty with balance). On 8/20/24, Resident #9 weighed 167.2 pounds (lbs). On 9/24/24, Resident #9 weighed 160 lbs., a weight loss of 7.2 lbs (4.3%) in one month, which was not significant. However, the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions or closer monitoring of the resident's weight to prevent further weight loss for the resident. The resident's care plan documented that the facility implemented a nutritional intervention on 11/5/24 which included providing the resident with nutritional supplements two times per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to take steps to protect one (#10) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 24 sample residents. Resident #10, who had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder and was always incontinent of urine and occasionally incontinent of bowel, was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADL), including toileting hygiene, showering, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene and transfers. She required maximal assistance from staff to propel her wheelchair. She was able to use her call light to call staff when she needed assistance. On 5/3/24, certified nurse aide (CNA) #2 provided a shower to Resident #10. After the resident's shower, CNA #2 placed Resident #10 in her wheelchair near the bathroom in her room. CNA #2 left Resident #10's room, without making the resident's bed and without telling the resident she would be back or why she was leaving the room and closed the door of the room. Resident #10 was unable to maneuver her wheelchair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#1, #6 and #7) of four residents reviewed for nutrition out of seven sample residents received the care and services necessary to meet their nutritional needs and maintain their highest level practicable physical well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent a significant weight loss, implement interventions after a significant weight loss was identified, consistently monitor weights and ensure meal intake records were accurate. Resident #1 experienced a significant, unplanned weight loss of 10.88% in less than two months. Resident #1's weight record/log identified Resident #1 lost almost 20 pounds (lbs) between 11/6/23 and 12/27/23. Resident #1's weight on 11/6/23 was 180.2 lbs. On 12/27/23 the resident's weight was 160.6 lbs. Weight loss was not identified as a potential concern in November 2023. Resident #1's meal intake record indicated the resident ate well. Interviews identified the resident had a poor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and/or safety devices to prevent falls and accidents for three (#35, #20 and #8) of eight residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #35 was not injured during a staff-assisted transfer out of her daughter's car on 4/2/23. The resident per facility assessments required two-plus person assist for transfers, but one staff person assisted Resident #35 to transfer out of the car into a wheelchair. The resident fell to the pavement and broke her foot causing her pain and discomfort and thereafter, reducing her mobility and contributing to a decline (cross-reference F692, weight loss/nutrition). Resident #20, who was at risk for elopement and had a wander guard, eloped from the facility on 6/21/23 and ambulated in her wheelchair into the parking lot toward the sidewalk. The sidewalk was adjacent to a busy four-lane street with fast-moving traffic. Before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#35) of nine residents reviewed for weight loss out of 37 sample residents maintained adequate nutritional parameters. Specifically, Resident #35 had a condition change when she experienced a fall with a fracture on 4/2/23 (cross-reference F689 falls/accidents). Resident #35's weights, taken on 3/30/23 and 5/11/23, more than one month apart, demonstrated a 10-pound weight loss from 201.6 to 191 pounds, which was not followed up with timely nutritional assessments and interventions. Resident #35 was observed needing extensive to total assistance with dining although her assessments and care plan identified she was independent with setup help only; staff who provided care for Resident #35 said she had needed an extensive level of assistance for about one month. There was no evidence of a thorough assessment of the resident's current dining assistance needs as of 7/13/23. The facility failed to respond in a timely manner to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly and timely investigate an allegation of sexual abuse and protect one (#43) of two residents out of 30 sample residents during and after the investigation and, failed to investigate a subsequent allegation reported in resident council of staff's rough treatment. Resident #43 alleged sexual abuse by registered nurse (RN) #4 on 3/12/22. The facility failed to timely respond, thoroughly investigate and protect Resident #43, and allowed RN #4 to continue working with Resident #43. As a result, Resident #43 said she felt very upset and angry that she was not believed, and was fearful of RN #4. There was insufficient evidence the facility took measures to reassure Resident #43 and ensure she felt safe in her home. The facility's failures contributed to Resident #43 experiencing anger and fear over a month after the allegation was reported. Record review also revealed the facility further failed to investigate an allegation during a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide one (#8) of two residents reviewed out of 30 sample residents, the care and services necessary to prevent the development of a stage 4 pressure injury to the resident's left foot, third digit (toe) that became infected and painful and was amputated within two months of admission. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with no documented pressure injuries but at risk for such injuries. He was a diabetic and had a history of toe amputations of both feet, and a hyperkeratotic lesion (thickening of skin) on the third digit on his left foot, one of his three remaining toes. The facility failed to consistently assess, monitor and document the condition of Resident #8's feet despite his history of diabetes and toe ulcers until 3/21/22, although wound clinic notes documented a superficial ulceration of the third digit, left foot a week earlier. The 3/21/22 nurses' note read the resident's toe was red, inflamed and tender. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse involving three (#2, #1 and #5) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of five sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to throughly investigate and timely report two allegations of sexual abuse by Resident #1 toward Resident #2 and Resident #5. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/17/26 at 5:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to timely investigate an allegation of abuse involving three (#2, #1 and #5) of five residents reviewed for abuse out of five sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to throughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse by Resident #1 towards Resident #2 and Resident #5. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/17/26 at 5:59 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide choices for preference of bathing schedule for two (#4 and #1) of six residents reviewed for self-determination out of 10 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and Resident #4, who were dependent on staff for care, received regular bathing in accordance with preferences and plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Self Determination policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/11/25 at 6:05 p.m. The policy read in part, Our facility respects and promotes the right of each resident to exercise his or her autonomy regarding what the resident considers to be important facets of his or her life. Each resident is allowed to choose activities, schedule health care and healthcare providers, that are consistent with his or her interests, values, assessments and care plans including daily routine, such as sleeping and waking, eating, exercise,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a copy of medical records were provided timely for two (#2 and #1) of three residents out of 10 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medical records were provided timely upon request to the representatives of Resident #2 and Resident #1. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Release of Information policy, revised November 2009, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/11/25 at 6:05 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, The resident may initiate a request to release such information contained in his or her records and charts to anyone he or she wishes. Such requests will be honored only upon the receipt of a written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative. A resident may obtain photocopies of his or her records by providing the facility with at least a 48 hour advance notice of such request. II. Residents' representative interviews Resident #2's representative was interviewed on 6/10/25 at 4:13 p.m. The representative said she requested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain or improve mobility for two (#4 and #1) of three residents out of 10 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide timely restorative services, as was care planned and recommended, for Resident #4; and, -Offer and provide a restorative service program for Resident #1 to help maintain the resident's function after the resident was discharged from therapy services. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Functional Impairment policy, revised September 2012, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/11/25 at 6:05 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Upon admission to the facility, at any time a significant change of condition occurs, and periodically during the resident's stay, the physician and staff will assess the resident's physical condition and functional status. A physician, nurse or therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin and misappropriation of resident property for three (#7, #8 and #3) of seven residents out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Report an allegation of physical abuse towards Resident #7 by Resident #3 to the State Agency; -Report an allegation of sexual abuse towards Resident #8 by Resident #3 to the State Agency; and, -Report an allegation of sexual abuse towards Resident #3 by Resident #9 to the State Agency. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Investigating and Reporting policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 4/2/25 at 3:34 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for two (#7 and #8) of seven residents out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation after: -An allegation of physical abuse towards Resident #7 by Resident #3; and, -An allegation of sexual abuse towards Resident #8 by Resident #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Investigating and Reporting policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 4/2/25 at 3:34 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#7) of five residents reviewed were free from abuse out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from physical abuse by Resident #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Investigating and Reporting policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 4/2/25 at 3:34 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of Resident property or injury of unknown source, the administrator is responsible for determining what actions are needed (if any) for the protection of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide catheter care, treatment and services to minimize the risk of urinary tract infections for one (#2) of three residents reviewed for catheter care out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff provided appropriate catheter care for Resident #2, who had a history of recurring urinary tract infections (UTI); and, -Ensure Resident #2's baseline care plan included catheter care for his indwelling Foley catheter. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Catheter Care policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 4/2/25 at 5:40 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. Use a clean washcloth with warm water and soap (or bathing wipe) to cleanse and rinse the catheter from the insertion site to approximately four inches outward. Ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Document behaviors that justified the rationale for Resident #1's physician's order for the use of as needed (PRN) Lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) after 14 days; and, -Ensure the physician was notified of Resident #1's frequent refusals of scheduled Lorazepam and reassessed Resident #1 for the need to continue the medication. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Antipsychotic Medication Use facility policy and procedure, revised July 2022 was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 4/2/25 at 6:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents will not receive PRN doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. The need to continue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.conditions in the kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the staff medications were not stored in the walk-in refrigerator with resident food; -Ensure the staff wore a beard net while preparing and serving meals; and, -Ensure the air vent above the food service line was free of dust and dirt. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure staff medications were not stored in the walk-in refrigerator A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, Chapter 7-5, effective 3/16/24, was retrieved on 12/29/24, revealed in pertinent part, Medicines belonging to employees that require refrigeration and are stored in a food refrigerator shall be stored in a package or container and kept inside a covered, leakproof container that is identified as a container for the storage of medicines. B. Observations During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 12/16/24 at 9:57 a.m. the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to implement an effective water management plan. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to Center for Disease Control (CDC), Controlling Legionella in Potable Water Systems, last reviewed 3/15/24, was retrieved on 12/31/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/control-legionella/php/toolkit/potable-water-systems-module.html It read in pertinent part, Operation, maintenance, and control limits guidance: Monitor temperature, disinfectant residuals, and pH frequently based on Legionella performance indicators for control. Adjust measurement frequency according to the stability of performance indicator values. For example, increase the measurement frequency if there's a high degree of measurement variability. Hot water:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accident hazards for five (#63, #9, #2, #57 and #23) of ten residents out of 46 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Implement and update fall care plans in a timely manner for Resident #63; -Ensure neurological checks were completed appropriately for Resident #63 and Resident #9 following an unwitnessed fall; -Ensure Resident #2 was safely transferred using a slide board; -Ensure Resident #57 was appropriately monitored while smoking; and, -Ensure safe transfer pole use for Resident #23. Findings include: I. Failure to initiate a timely fall care plan and interventions to prevent falls for Resident #63 and complete neurological assessments after a fall for Resident #63 and Resident #9. A. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2020), Elsevier, St. Louis Missouri, pp. 1780, retrieved on 12/30/24, In the event of a fall,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive at the appropriate temperatures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at the appropriate temperature. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food and Nutrition Services policy, revised October 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/19/24 at 5:38 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. If an incorrect meal is provided to a resident, or a meal does not appear palatable, the nursing staff will report it to the food service manager so that a new food tray can be issued. II.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure 10 (#12, #64, #4, #15, #41, #55, #7, #44, #18 and #129) of 17 residents with an order for a mechanically altered diet texture out of 46 sample residents received food and fluids prepared in a form designed to meet their needs per physician orders. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide Resident #12, #64, #4, #15, #41, #55, #7, #44 and #18 with the correct altered mechanical soft diet texture: and, -Provide Resident #129 with the correct altered pureed diet texture. Findings include: I. Professional reference The comparison of National Dysphagia Diet (NDD) and International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI), reviewed July 2021, was retrieved on 12/29/24 from https://iddsi.org/IDDSI/media/images/CountrySpecific/UnitedStates/NDD-to-IDDSI-Implementation.pdf. It read in pertinent part, NDD of 2002 is being replaced by the IDDSI Framework, founded in 2013. This is the only professionally recognized and supported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to formulate an advanced directive for one (#63) of two residents out of 46 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63's proxy selected or refused life-saving treatments within the power of a proxy. Findings include: I. Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) form The MOST form documented that a Proxy-by-Statute (decision maker selected through a proxy process) may not decline artificial nutrition or hydration for an incapacitated resident without an attending physician and a second physician trained in neurology who certified that artificial nutrition or hydration would merely prolong the act of dying and was unlikely to result in the restoration of the resident to independent neurological functioning. II. Resident status Resident #63, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included vascular dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice, the resident's care plan, goals and preferences for two (#32 and #70) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care out of 46 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Implement a care plan focus with purpose, goals and interventions to document Resident #32 and Resident #70's goals for using a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP/BiPAP) machine; -Develop and implement effective interventions to maintain and clean Resident #32 and Resident #70's CPAP/BiPAP machines to ensure the non-invasive mechanical ventilators were maintained in a hygienic manner; and, -Develop and implement effective interventions for oxygen therapy for Resident #32 and Resident #70. Findings include: I. Manufacturer's recommendations The ResMed AirSense10 manufactures User Guide, dated 2021, was provided by the nursing home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations for two (#28 and #43) of five residents out of 46 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccinations to Resident #28 or Resident #43. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2022, retrieved on 1/2/25, from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf, in pertinent part, Routine vaccination-pneumococcal: For those ages 19 to 64 with an additional risk factor or another indication was: One (1) dose PCV15 (pneumococcal 15-valent conjugate vaccine PCV15 Vaxneuvance) followed by PPSV23 (pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine PPSV23 Pneumovax 23)or one (1) dose PCV20 (pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine PCV20 Prevnar 20). For those over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote resident dignity and respect for two (#1 and #2) of four residents reviewed for dignity out of 11 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 were treated and spoken to in a dignified manner. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Dignity policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the corporate clinical consultant (CCC) on 9/12/23. The policy read in part: Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times. Residents may exercise their right without interference, corrosion, discrimination or reprisal from any person or entity associated with this facility. The Resident Rights policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the CCC on 9/12/23. The policy read in part: Employees shall treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dietary department followed safe practices to prevent the potential contamination of food and spread of food-borne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure cold food items were at appropriate temperatures; -Ensure expired food was discarded; and, -Ensure food items removed from its original packaging and opened had a dating system. Findings include: I. Food temperatures of cold and hot food items were not held at the proper temperature to reduce the risk of food-borne illness. A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf. It read in pertinent part, The food shall have an initial temperature of 41ºF (Fahrenheit) or less when removed from cold holding temperature control or 135°F or greater when removed from hot holding temperature control. (Retrieved 7/18/23). B. Ensuring holding temperatures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure remedial actions were followed and timely implemented after the identification of Legionella was detected in the facility's water. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for Legionella, last reviewed on 3/25/21, was retrieved on 7/17/23 at https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/wmp/healthcare-facilities/healthcare-wmp-faq.html under Heathcare Water Mangement read in pertinent part: Healthcare facilities, such as hospitals and nursing homes, usually serve the populations at highest risk for Legionnaires' disease. These include older people and those who have certain risk factors, such as being a current or former…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (#4, #50, #125 and #36) of 11 residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents were kept free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 did not suffer from verbal abuse by Resident #66. The facility failed to ensure effective personalized care planned interventions were in place for Resident #4 to prevent verbal abuse, who had a history of dementia and was exhibiting constant loud vocalizations. On [DATE] Resident #66 shouted at Resident #4, while in Resident #4's room, to shut up and stop yelling as she was disturbing him and the entire hallway. Resident #4 was observed hunched over in a wheelchair with hands covering her face. The facility further failed to ensure: -Resident #50 did not suffer from verbal/mental abuse by registered nurse (RN) #1; -Resident #125 did not suffer mistreatment/physical abuse by certified nurse aides (CNAs) #14 and #15; and, -Resident #36 did not suffer from verbal abuse by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for four (#8, #63, #50 and #7) of nine residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #8 received adequate assistance with bathing, grooming and toilet use/incontinence; -Resident #63 received adequate assistance with bathing and grooming; -Resident #50 received adequate assistance with showers; and -Resident #7 received adequate assistance with showers. All the above residents needed physical assistance from staff with these ADLs. Residents #50 and #7 said the lack of showers affected their psychosocial well-being. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)-Supporting policy, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/13/23 at 6:00 p.m., documented in pertinent part: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills to ensure the residents received the care and services they required as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff which considered the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment, resident census and daily care required by the residents. Cross-reference F689 accident hazards and F677 activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: I. Facility policy The Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing policy, revised August 2022, read in pertinent part: Our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (#4, #36, #50 and #125) of 11 residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents had personalized behavioral interventions in place. Specifically, the failed to ensure: -Resident #4, who had a history of dementia, had effective personalized behavioral interventions care planned and in place who was exhibiting verbally disruptive behaviors and was at risk for abuse; and -Residents #36, #50 and #125 had personalized behavioral interventions care planned for dementia and trauma informed care for these residents that were difficult to redirect and had triggered behaviors. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dementia Clinical Protocol policy and procedure, reviewed [DATE], and was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 6:00 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The staff and physician will review the current physical, functional, and psychosocial status of individuals with dementia, and will summarize the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive at the appropriate temperatures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident food was palatable in taste, texture, temperature and appearance. Findings include: I. Resident group interview A group interview was conducted on 7/12/23 at 9:56 a.m. with four alert and oriented residents (#7, #26, #30 and #40). All the residents in the group interview said that the food was not palatable. Some of the comments were as follows: -The food was salty. -Chicken was dry and fatty. -The food was institutional food (lacked quality, variety and value). -The food came at room temperature. II. Resident interviews Resident #72 was interviewed on 7/10/23 at 9:10 a.m. The resident said he wanted eggs over medium but he was served runny eggs and scrambled eggs. Resident #43 was interviewed on 7/10/23 at 1:56 p.m. The resident said the food was bland and he would love to have a burrito or Thai chili. Resident #47's family representative was interviewed on 7/10/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure its quality assurance and process improvement (QAPI) committee prioritized its improvement activities, developed and implemented action plans, measured the success of those actions, tracked performance, regularly reviewed and analyzed and acted on data collected. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and implement effective action plans to address repeat deficiencies and resident quality of life and quality of care issues related to abuse prevention, activities of daily living, dementia care, quality assurance and infection control. Findings include: I. Repeat deficiencies A. Abuse: cross-reference F600 abuse and F609 failure to report abuse allegations. Failure to investigate abuse allegations was cited at a harm level during the previous recertification survey on 5/19/22, 3/24/22 and was cited again during the current recertification survey on 7/13/23. B. Activities of daily living (ADLs): cross-reference F677. Failure to provide assistance with ADLs in keeping with resident needs and preferences was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of two (#63 and #16) of seven residents reviewed for environmental concerns out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, Residents #63 and #16, who used wheelchairs for ambulation, were unable to access their bathrooms, have privacy while in their bathrooms and/or fully utilize their toiletry items at the sink in shared rooms. Findings include: I. Resident #63 A. Resident status Resident #63, under age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), pulmonary hypertension, hypoxic respiratory failure and stage 4 kidney disease. According to the 5/3/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, he was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. He had verbal behaviors directed toward others but no rejection of care. He required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident room temperatures were comfortable and safe for residents in one of three neighborhoods. Specifically, the residents who lived in two of eight resident rooms on the west side of Grand Mesa Hall experienced uncomfortably hot room temperatures when outdoor temperatures were high. Residents said all the rooms in that area of the building were uncomfortably hot and the facility's evaporative cooling system was ineffective. Findings include: I. Observations and resident interviews On 7/10/23 at 8:00 a.m. the facility hallways were observed with signs posted explaining why nursing facilities needed to have the room temperatures kept between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit. High outdoor temperatures during the survey, conducted 7/10 through 7/13/23, ranged from 98 to 101 degrees Fahrenheit, according to the National Weather Service website. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on 7/10/23 at 9:32 a.m. Her bedroom was uncomfortably hot and she said it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to report incidents of potential abuse to the State Survey and Certification agency in accordance with State law for three (#4, #66 and #50) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report: -An incident of verbal abuse involving Resident #4 and Resident #66; and, -Incidents involving verbal/mental abuse by registered nurse (RN) #1 toward Resident #50 to the State Survey and Certification Agency. Cross-reference F600, failure to ensure residents were free from abuse. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention policy and procedure, last reviewed April 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/18/23 at 4:06 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframes required by federal requirements. II. Abuse incident involving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to coordinate assessment with the preadmission screening resident review (PASRR) program for one (#50) of two residents reviewed for PASRR out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to submit another PASRR assessment when Resident #50's diagnosis changed in June 2023. Finding include: I. Facility policy The policy regarding PASRR assessments was requested from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/12/23 at 2:40 p.m. The NHA said the facility did not have a policy for PASRRs. II. Resident status Resident #50, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder (recurrent and moderate), anxiety disorder, and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD). The 7/5/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment showed the resident had a mild cognitive impairment, with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program to meet the psychosocial needs of one (#8) of six residents reviewed out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, Resident #8 had specialized activity needs due to diagnoses of autism and major depression. Resident #8 was deaf and did not speak. The facility failed to develop effective methods to communicate with the resident, family and interdisciplinary team to assess, develop and implement activities in keeping with his preferences and communication needs to ensure he reached his highest practicable psychosocial potential and well-being. The facility failed to meet Resident #8's specialized, person-centered activity needs which contributed to his isolation. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #8, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2023 computerized physician orders, diagnoses included autistic disorder, legal blindness, hearing loss and major depression. According…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral healthcare and services to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for one (#7) of four residents reviewed for behavioral services out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document Resident #7's suicidal ideation and self-harm tendencies to ensure staff knew what behaviors or statements to watch for and how to help Resident #7 with her increased anxiety and depression. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Suicide Threats policy, revised in December 2007, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/13/23 at 6:00 p.m. The policy included: Resident suicide threats shall be taken seriously and addressed appropriately. 1. Staff shall report any resident threats of suicide immediately to the nursing supervisor or the charge registered nurse (RN). 2. The nursing supervisor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent. Specifically the facility's medication error rate was 7.41% with two errors out of 27 opportunities. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Administering Medications policy and procedure, reviewed April 2019, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/13/23 at 6:00 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. II. Professional reference According to the Levemir FlexPen manufacturer guidelines, updated December 2022, retrieved from https://www.mynovoinsulin.com/content/dam/diabetes-patient/mynovoinsulin/branded/Levemir/Downloads/US22LV00014_LEV_FlexPen_Quick_Guide.pdf on 7/20/23 included the following recommendations, Before each injection, prime your pen by performing an airshot. Turn the dose selector…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant mediation errors for one (#3) of four residents reviewed for medication errors out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #3 was administered the correct dose of insulin by properly priming the insulin pen before insulin administration. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Levemir FlexPen manufacturer guidelines, last updated, December 2022, retrieved from https://www.mynovoinsulin.com/content/dam/diabetes-patient/mynovoinsulin/branded/Levemir/Downloads/US22LV00014_LEV_FlexPen_Quick_Guide.pdf on 7/20/23 included the following recommendations, Before each injection, prime your pen by performing an airshot. Turn the dose selector to select 2 units. Holding your pen with the needle pointing up, tap the cartridge gently with your finger a few times to make any air bubbles collect at the top of the cartridge. Press and hold the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in one of three medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure expired medications were timely removed from the medication storage area and refrigerator; and, -Ensure expired tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) was removed timely from the medication storage refrigerator. Findings include: I. Professional reference Sanofi Pasteur. (2020). Package insert. Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (Mantoux): Tubersol. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). https://www.fda.gov/media/74866/download, retrieved on 7/20/23 at 1:38 p.m. A vial of Tubersol (tuberculin purified protein derivative) which has been entered and in use for 30 days should be discarded. Do not use it after the expiration date. U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2/8/21). Don't be tempted to use expired medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to maintain communication with the hospice provider, including how the communication would be documented between the facility and the provider for one (#47) of four residents reviewed for hospice care services out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to for Resident #47: -Demonstrate documentation of a collaboration of care between the facility and the hospice provider; -Delineate care responsibilities between facility care staff and hospice care staff and the frequency of the hospice staff visits; and, -Documentation of hospice staff visits and the hospice plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hospice Program policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/12/23 at 4:51 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part: In general, it is the responsibility of hospice to manage the resident's care as it relates to the terminal illness and related conditions, including:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure mechanical equipment was in safe, operational condition. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure necessary kitchen equipment was maintained in safe, working condition. Findings include: I. Observations On 7/10/23 at 8:10 a.m. a kitchen inspection revealed the hand washing sink and a food preparation sink had low pressure and was not warm to touch. At 4:21 p.m. the hand washing sink and food preparation sink had low pressure and was not warm to touch. On 7/11/23 at 11:19 a.m., the hand washing sink and food preparation sink had low pressure and was not warm to touch. On 7/12/23 at 7:02 a.m. the hand washing sink and food preparation sink had low pressure and was not warm to touch. II. Staff interviews Cook #3 was interviewed on 7/10/23 at 4:21 p.m. She said the maintenance department was aware that the hand washing sink did not have enough pressure and did not get as hot as she wanted it to be. She said sometimes her hands did not feel as clean as they should be after she washed her hands. Cook #1 was interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify concerns and or implement effective action plans to mitigate the repetition facility failures including quality of care and infection control. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, revised February 2020, was proved by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/16/22.The policy read in pertinent parts, The facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. According to the policy, the QAPI program objectives were to: -Provide a means to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to take action on grievances of the resident group. Specifically, resident council members brought forward the following concerns: -Some certified nurse aides (CNAs) were being a little rough (cross-reference F610 to investigate allegations of abuse); -Call light response was too slow, and as a result residents did not receive timely assistance to the bathroom, and did not receive baths/showers; -Water cups were not being changed enough and the water got warm or their cups were empty; -Laundry service was slow and clothing items were missing and not returned; -Food orders were not being taken correctly, so residents were not receiving their food choices; and -Food and coffee needed to be hotter. The facility failed to initiate, document and investigate grievances associated with resident council concerns, take action, and report back to residents to ensure the issues were resolved. The facility further failed to communicate to residents their rights to file grievances orally and in writing, and contact the State Agency to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for four (#11, #14, #3 and #8) of six residents reviewed out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely: -Incontinence care, grooming and bathing for Resident #11; -Incontinence care, assistance with toilet use and bathing for Resident #14. -Baths/showers for Resident #3; and, -Incontinence care, grooming and showers for Resident #8. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting policy was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on the afternoon of 5/19/22. The policy statement included: Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (#6, #8, #14 and #38) reviewed for accident hazards of six residents out of 30 sample residents, were provided adequate supervision and a safe environment to prevent accidents and the re-occurrence of accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Comprehensively review, implement effective interventions and update the resident's care plans after multiple falls for Resident #6, #8 and #14; and, -Provide a safe environment with adequate supervision to avoid potential safety hazards for Resident #38. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Fall Management and Investigation policy, effective 9/1/18, was provided by the facility on 5/19/22. The policy read in pertinent part: The (facility) utilizes all reasonable efforts to provide a system to review residents 'potential risk for falls and provide a proactive program of supervision, assistive devices and interventions to manage and minimize falls and identify residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#19, #20 and #43) of five residents reviewed for medications of 30 sample residents were free from unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Obtain an informed consent for Residents #19, #20 and #43 for the use of antipsychotic medication; and, -Create a care plan that addressed the use of an antipsychotic medication for Resident #20. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Antipsychotic Medication Use policy and procedure, dated December 2016, was provided by the assistant director of nurses (ADON) on 5/19/22 at 5:09 p.m. It included residents who would only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and affected. Based on assessing the resident's symptoms and overall situation, the physician would determine whether to continue, adjust, or stop existing antipsychotic medication. -The policy and procedure did not include guidance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the potential spread of infection. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide wound care in a sanitary manner for Resident #8; -Provide hand hygiene for residents before meal service; -Maintain a clean and sanitary environment for residents in their rooms; and, -Ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hand Washing policy, revised 10/1/17, provided by the staff development coordinator (SDC) on 5/19/22 at 1:22 p.m. included: Hand washing is the most important component for managing the spread of infection. Hand washing is one of the most crucial measures in reducing transmission of pathogens in healthcare settings. The use of gloves does not eliminate the need to wash hands. Hand washing is performed: -If moving from a contaminated-body site to a clean-body site during resident care. -After contact with an object or source where there is a concentration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to allow residents to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that were significant to them for two (#39 and #46) out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide routine bathing consistent with the residents' preferences for Resident #39 and #46. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Person-Centered Care Plan Guidelines policy and procedure, dated 9/1/18, was provided by the assistant director of nurses (ADON) on 5/19/22 at 5:09 p.m., in lieu of a policy and procedure for resident choices. It documented that interventions that accounted for each residents' life story and identity should be included in their preferences and choices. These offered the resident control in their life throughout the day, helped the resident feel safe, and supported in their surroundings. II. Failure to provide bathing according to preference A. Resident #39 Resident #39, age [AGE], was admitted [DATE] and readmitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to formulate advance directives for one (#43) of one resident reviewed out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, although Resident #43 was facility assessed as cognitively intact, her power of attorney (POA)/family signed her advance directives and designated her status as do not resuscitate (DNR). Findings include: I. Facility policy The Resident Rights policy, revised December 2016, was provided by the nursing home administrator on the afternoon of 5/19/22. The policy documented in pertinent part: Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: -Exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility; and -Be supported by the facility in exercising his or her rights. -The policy did not mention advance directives and the facility did not have a specific policy regarding advance directives. II. Resident status Resident #43, age [AGE], was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#19) of five residents reviewed for dementia care of 30 sample residents, received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to comprehensively identify person-centered approaches for dementia care for Resident #19. Findings include: I. Professional standard The Gerontologist (February 2018), retrieved from on 6/1/22: https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/58/suppl_1/S1/4816759?login=true The Alzheimer's Association Dementia Care Practice Recommendations included the following foundations for person-centered care: 1. Know the person living with dementia. It is important to know the unique and complete person, including his/her values, beliefs, interests, abilities, likes, and dislikes-both past and present. This information should inform every interaction and experience. 2. Recognize and accept the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of each resident for one (#38) of one resident reviewed for dental out of 30 sample residents. Specifically, Resident #38 was not timely offered the opportunity to see a dentist, impacting his ability to safely chew all his food and receive food choices of his preference. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #38, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2022 computerized physicians orders (CPO) diagnoses included heart failure, muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation, major depressive disorder, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. According to the 4/7/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was four out of 15 and indicated severe cognitive impairment. He required supervision with set only for all his activities of daily living (ADL). The resident's oral and dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$117,284 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $46,557 — penalty dated 2024-12-19
  • $39,104 — penalty dated 2024-05-10
  • $31,623 — penalty dated 2024-03-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to STELLAR SENIOR LIVING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • BLACKROCK INC — investment firm · 7.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • FLAT FOOTED LLC — investment firm · 9.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • ABP TRUST — REIT · 9.67% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • VANGUARD GROUP INC — investment firm · 8.35% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • H/2 SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES IV L.P. — investment firm · 6.20% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • D.E. SHAW & CO., L.P. — investment firm · 5.73% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • SPTIHS PROPERTIES TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SPTIHS PROPERTIES TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/2020
CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/22/2024
D.E. SHAW & CO., L.P.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/22/2024
DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020
H/2 SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES IV L.P.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/22/2024
SNH PROJ LINCOLN TRS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2024
SNH TRS LICENSEE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020
SNH TRS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020
BILOTTO, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
PORTNOY, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
BROWN, MATTHEWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2023
CLARK, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
ABP TRUSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2024
BLACKROCK INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2024
FLAT FOOTED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2024
STELLAR MANTEY HEIGHTS MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
STELLAR SENIOR LIVING B LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
STELLAR V LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
VANGUARD GROUP INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/22/2024
BENTON, EVRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2021
SHENEMAN, BRADLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/05/2025
SONG, XIAOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
YOUNG, MISTYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/10/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 59 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 3%Other / private 32%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,548per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065307. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next