Cedars Healthcare Center
1599 Ingalls St, Lakewood, CO 80214 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (303) 232-3551 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (27% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $55,908 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-16)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- CMS ownership filings flag it as owned by a private-equity firm or REIT — a category that performs worse on staffing on average, though that average says nothing certain about this home, and CMS filings undercount these ties, so other homes here may have them unflagged (what the research actually shows →)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 8.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.6% | 13.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 21.2% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.9% | 20.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.6% | 1.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 108.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#7) of six residents reviewed for quality of care out of seven sample residents, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice.IMMEDIATE JEOPARDYResident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease that causes symptoms such as tremors, stiffness and slow movement), epilepsy without status epilepticus (seizure lasting longer than five minutes, or two or more seizures without the resident gaining consciousness in between them), chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen and cognitive communication deficit.On 6/26/25, Resident #7 experienced seizure activity that lasted longer than 30 minutes. During the seizure activity, the resident was observed to be having seizures by several staff members. The nurse practitioner (NP) was notified three times, by three different staff members, during the resident's seizure activity, however the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents out of eight sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to identify and respond to Resident #1's non-pressure related skin condition resulting in the development of osteomyelitis (bone infection), hospitalization and amputation of his left great toe. Resident #1, diagnosed with heart disease with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus, was admitted to the facility 12/14/21. The facility failed to follow standards of practice in identifying, documenting, reporting to physicians and providing treatment per physician orders. The facility responded by educating nursing staff on the appropriate protocol for wound identification, management, condition changes and notification to appropriate parties. The education proved to be ineffective when the nurses were interviewed and revealed they were not able to identify when a skin condition should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY V. Resident #36 A. Resident status Resident #36, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2021 CPO diagnoses included, malignant neoplasm (cancer) of colon, and multi system degeneration of the autonomic nervous system. The 6/15/21 minimum data set (MDS) assessment showed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. The resident was independent in all self care areas. The resident had no behavior issues. B. Resident interview Resident #36 was interviewed on 8/11/21 at 10:33 a.m. The resident said he could not relax living here at the facility. He said he had lived at the facility for the past five years and has had six different roommates. He said Resident #1 used to be his roommate, however, he moved approximately six months ago. Resident #1 was moved because he was making racial comments and name calling to him. The name calling was in regards to using the N word (considered a racial slur) to an African American male resident. He said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care to each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 12 (#2, #8, #13, #35, #37, #50, #69, #74, #92, #33 #44, #43, #93, #103 and #57) out of 55 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for Resident #2, Resident #8, Resident #13, Resident #35, Resident#37, Resident #50, Resident #69, Resident #74, Resident #92, Resident #33, Resident #44, Resident #43, Resident #93, Resident #103 and Resident #57. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Call System, Residents Call policy, revised September 2022, was provided by the assistant director of nursing (ADON) on 6/11/26 at 4:22 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance throughout a communication system that directly calls a staff member or a centralized work station. Calls for assistance are answered as soon as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report alleged violations of physical abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency in accordance with state law for three (#56, #79 and #74) of six residents reviewed for abuse out of 55 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure an incident of alleged verbal abuse for Resident #56 was reported to the State Survey Agency;-Ensure an incident of alleged sexual abuse for Resident #79 was reported to the State Survey Agency; and,-Ensure an incident of alleged injury of unknown origin for Resident #74 was reported in a timely manner to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse Prevention policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/8/26 at 12:58 p.m. It read in pertinent part, All employees who have reasonable cause to believe a resident has suffered abuse are responsible for reporting that information to the executive director or upon his/her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for two (#1 and #2) of six residents out of seven sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of scheduled medications for Resident #1 and Resident #2. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Administering Medications policy, dated April 2019, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 7/15/25 at 10:06 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Only persons licensed or permitted may prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications. The director of nursing services (DON) supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions. Medications are administered by prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medication administration times are determined by resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents out of five sample residents received treatment and care for optimal skin condition of a contracted hand, in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility did not provide adequate skin care to prevent skin breakdown in Resident #1's contracted hands and between the resident's fingers and the thumb. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the [NAME] Health NHS Foundation Trust Hand Contractures, February 2022, retrieved on 8/28/24, from https://www.oxfordhealth.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2023/06/1.6.3-Hand-Contractures-Advice-Sheet-for-Care-Homes.pdf, It is vital to adequately manage this condition in order to prevent pressure sores and skin breakdown in the palm and fingers. Once a hand contracture is present it can become very painful. Movements can be uncomfortable, but it is essential to maintain adequate hand hygiene; Hand hygiene is essential management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on two of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff were following the proper cleaning techniques for cleaning resident rooms and disinfecting high frequency touch areas (call lights, door handles and handrails); -Ensure housekeeping staff were trained appropriately on housekeeping procedures; and, -Ensure surface disinfectant times were adhered to. Findings include: I. Professional reference Assadian O, Harbarth S, Vos M, et al. Practical recommendations for routine cleaning and disinfection procedures in healthcare institutions: a narrative review. The Journal of Hospital Infection. 2021 Jul;113:104-114, retrieved on 3/22/24, revealed in pertinent part: High-touch surfaces, on the other hand, are usually close to the patient, are frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for two (#180 and #40) of six residents out of 34 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #180 was evaluated on admission for use of a restraint; -Ensure a consent was signed for use of a restraint for Resident #180 and #40; -Ensure there was a physician's order for restraints for resident #180 and #4; and, -Ensure there was a quarterly wander risk evaluation completed for Resident #40. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Use of Restraint policy, revised April 2017, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/18/24 at 8:04 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well being of the residents. Prior to placing a resident in a restraint, there shall be a pre-restraining assessment and review to determine the need for restraint. Restraints shall only be used upon the written order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a preadmission screening resident review (PASRR) for individuals remaining in a facility 30 days past provisional admission approval for one (#56) of one resident reviewed for PASRR out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to submit a new PASRR level I once an automatically approved provisional admission from a hospital had expired for Resident #56 after she had resided in the facility for more than 30 days. Findings include: I. Facility policy The admission Criteria policy, revised [DATE], was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 11:15 a.m. It read in pertinent part: This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Exceptions to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (#64) of three residents reviewed out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #64, who was dependent on staff for bathing, received her scheduled showers. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the director of medical records (DMR) on 3/18/24 at 4:48 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). II. Resident #64 A. Resident status Resident #64, age below 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters received the appropriate care and services according to professional standards for one (#74) of two residents reviewed for catheters of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Obtain physician orders for catheter use for Resident #74; -Ensure Resident #74 had a clinical indication (diagnosis) for catheter use prior to administration; -Ensure Resident #74 had a person centered care plan to address all care needs related to the resident indwelling catheter; and, -Ensure Resident #74's catheter drainage bag was not touching the floor. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Urinary Catheter Care policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the director of medical records (DMR) on 3/19/24 at 10:21 a.m. It read in pertinent part: The purpose of the policy was to prevent infection of the resident's urinary tract. Review and document the clinical indication for catheter use prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was a trauma survivor received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for one (#56) of one resident out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify Resident #56's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and identify triggers which may retraumatize her. Findings include: I. Facility Policy The Trauma Informed Care policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/19/24 at 11:25 a.m. It read in pertinent part: It was the policy of the facility to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards. The facility will account for residents' experiences, preferences, and cultural…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly on one of two medication carts and one medication storage room of two medication storage rooms. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure insulin (medications used for glucose control) pens and vials were labeled with open dates; and, -Ensure expired or discontinued medications were removed from the medication room and medication cart. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Lantus glargine package insert, retrieved 3/19/24 from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/021081s076lbl.pdf, When not in use store in refrigerated temperatures of 36 to 46 degrees. When in use, it can be kept at room temperature for up to 28 days. According to the Humalog (lispro insulin) package insert, retrieved 3/19/24 from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/020563s115lbl.pdf, Should be used within 28 days or be discarded, even if they still contain Humalog. According to the Novolog package insert, retrieved on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services and assistance with mobility for one (#4) of three out of eight sample residents. Specifically, the failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure for mobility consistent Resident #4's needs and choices. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Activities of daily living (ADLs) policy, reviewed March 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 10/17/23 at 12:53 p.m. The policy read in part, Residents would be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to cany out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: mobility (transfer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for five (#1, #2, #3, #5 and #8) of eight residents reviewed for immunizations out of eight sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Administer the pneumococcal vaccine after consent signed for Resident #2 and #5; and, -Offer the pneumococcal vaccination to Resident #1, #3 and #8 yearly after a refusal. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommended Immunization Schedule for Adults Aged 19 Years or Older, United States, 2023, retrieved on 9/27/23, from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/adult/adult-combined-schedule.pdf, in pertinent part: Routine vaccination - pneumococcal -For those ages 19 or older with an additional risk factor or another indication was: One (1) dose PCV15 (pneumococcal 15-valent conjugate vaccine PCV15 Vaxneuvance) followed by PPSV23 (pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment on one out of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were kept clean and residents had their belongings unpacked during a facility renovation. Findings include: I. Observations During the initial tour on 11/28/22 at 9:30 a.m. of the University unit, the following was observed: -Wheelchairs, mechanical lifts and cardboard boxes were observed stored on both sides of the hallway. -room [ROOM NUMBER] had food debris and trash including paper, tissues and linens lying on the floor. The A side of the room had corrugated cardboard boxes stored on top of the empty bed with a mattress propped up next to the bed. -room [ROOM NUMBER] A side had food debris lying on the floor around and underneath the bed. Trash, including tissues and paper, was observed lying on the floor next to the bed. -At 11:37 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with boxes and plastic bags placed in front of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure activities designed to support residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being were provided for three (#48, #45 and #5) of three residents out of 42 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure there was a system in place to identify residents in need of one-to-one activities and developed a comprehensive care plan which addressed Resident #48, #45, #5's socialization and activity needs; and, -Provide the residents with a one-to-one activities plan. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities Program policy and procedure, revised September 2014, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/5/22 at 12:12 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, Ensure there are a variety of activities available in outings, social, health and fitness, education, crafts and that they reflect the constantly changing needs of the resident based on their abilities and preferences Meet one to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. Specifically, the facility failed to employ a qualified activities director in order to provide a program of activities for residents requiring activity and recreational support. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the National Certification Council of Activity Professionals (NCCAP) at www.nccap.org, accessed 12/5/22, an activity director must meet specific qualifications in education, certification and/or experience. The qualifications read in part: The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is: Licensed or registered, if applicable, by the State in which practicing; Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body. Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years, one of which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#177) was free from significant medication errors out of 42 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the resident was administered her morning medications before she left at 7:00 a.m. for a scheduled blood infusion at a hospital. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Administering Medications policy, revised April 2019, was provided via email by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/5/22 at 12:12 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so. The director of nursing services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions. Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions. Medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection in two out of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure resident rooms were cleaned in a sanitary manner; -Ensure hand hygiene was performed in between gloves changes and that gloves were changed throughout the cleaning process of resident rooms; -Ensure manufacturer recommended surface contact times were followed for effective disinfection; and, -Ensure oxygen tubing and nasal cannulas were stored off the floor, in a clean bag and replaced when contaminated. Findings include: I. Housekeeping A. Manufacturer's recommendations According to the Ecolab Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner and Disinfectant manufacturer guidelines, revised on July 2019, was provided by the housekeeping supervisor (HSS) on 12/1/22 at 3:55 p.m. included the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#45) of one resident out of 42 sample residents had the right to participate in the development and implementation of her person-centered plan of care. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct consistent care plan meetings for Resident #45 and ensure either the resident or the responsible party was involved in the conferences. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Comprehensive Care Plan policy and procedure, revised March 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/12/22 at 12:12 p.m. It revealed, in pertinent part, The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. Care plan meetings are scheduled at the best time of the day for the resident and family when possible. If it is determined that the participation of the resident or representative is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#40 and #32) of four residents remained free from resident-to-resident abuse, out of 42 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse between Residents #40 and #74; and, -Prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse between Residents #18 and #32. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse Prevention Program policy, revised December 2016, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/29/22 at 9:00 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse; this includes physical abuse. As part of the resident abuse prevention, the administrator will: Protect our residents from abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, (and) other residents. Develop and implement policies and procedures to aid our facility in preventing abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of our residents. II. Incident of physical abuse between Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Basedonobservations recordreviewandinterviewsthefacilityfailedtoensurethatactivitiesofdailyliving(ADL fordependentresidentswereprovidedforthree(#42, #14 and#65) oftenoutof42 sampleresidents Specifically thefacilityfailedto -EnsurethatResident#42 and#14, whowereatriskforskinbreakdown wererepositionedtimely and -Resident#65 wasofferedandprovidedshowers Findingsinclude I Professionalreference AccordingtoPechlivanoglou P etal Turninghighriskpatients Aneconomicevaluationofrepositioningfrequencyinlongtermcare JournaloftheAmericanGeriatricsSociety 2018 July 66(7): 1409-1414. https//wwwncbinlmnihgovpmcarticlesPMC097929/ retrievedon12/5/22. AccordingtocurrentUS(UnitedStates practiceguidelines nursinghomeresidentsshouldberepositionedasfrequentlyasrequiredbytheircondition PracticeguidelinesinCanadaandtheUSrecommendthatpatientsathighriskofpressureulcersberepositionedeverytwohours II Facilitypolicyandprocedure TheRepositioningpolicyandprocedure revisedinMay2013, wasprovidedbythenursinghomeadministrator(NHA on12/5/22 at12:12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment was free from accident hazards and received supervision and assistance to prevent accidents and hazards for one (#37) out of 42 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #37 did not keep medications at the bedside. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Self-Administration of Medications policy and procedure, reviewed February 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/5/22 at 12:12 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision making capacity to do so safely. The interdisciplinary team considers the following factors when determining whether self-administration of medications is safe and appropriate for the resident: The medication is appropriate for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-01 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide person centered interventions for one (#28) resident, who was diagnosed with dementia, to maintain her highest physical, mental and psychosocial well being out of 42 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that effective person centered interventions for Resident #28 with a dementia diagnosis and who wandered. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Wandering and Elopement policy and procedure, revised March 2019, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 12/5/22 at 12:12 p.m. It read, in pertinent part, The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. If identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues, the resident's care plan will include strategies and interventions to maintain the resident's safety. II. Resident status Resident #28, age…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-08-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills to ensure the residents received the care and services they required as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently provide adequate nursing staff which considered the acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment, resident census and daily care required by the residents. As a result of inadequate staffing, the facility had delayed call light response, failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs ). Cross-reference F676 failure to provide assistance with activities of daily living and F688 for restorative services. Findings include: I. Resident census and conditions According to the 8/11/21 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, the resident census was 66 and the following care needs were identified: -54 residents needed assistance of one or two staff with bathing and 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective infection control program. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff members were utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). -Offer and assist Residents with hand washing prior to meals and have staff wash hands after providing care. -Conduct COVID-19 testing in appropriate locations with appropriate PPE. -Ensure housekeeping staff were trained in proper infection control. Findings include: I. Appropriate personal protective equipment A. Professional reference The Center for Disease Control (CDC), Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Patients with Suspected or Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Healthcare Settings, last updated 4/13/2020, retrieved 8/16/21 from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/infection-control-recommendations.html#minimize, read in pertinent part, Healthcare Personnel as part of source control efforts, HCP should wear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure three (#50, #2 and #36) of four out of 32 sample residents reviewed had the right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care. Specifically, the facility failed to invite schedule a care conference with the Resident #50, #2 and #36. Findings include: I. Facility policy The care plan development and communication policy was provided by the regional nurse consultant on 8/17/21 at 3:00 p.m. It read, in pertinent part: The resident and/or responsible parties are invited in writing to the residents ' care plan meeting. Each resident and/or responsible party are invited and included at the specific time for the care conference. If the time is inconvenient for the resident and/or family member, a separate meeting is rescheduled to accommodate their needs. II. Residents not attending care conferences 1. Resident #50 A. Resident #50 status Resident #50, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances for all residents. The facility failed to develop and maintain a grievance process that ensured the residents received appropriate resolution to their identified concerns. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents' grievances and concerns were reported, tracked, investigated and enacted a plan for resolution. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Complaints and Grievances policy, last revised September 2019, was provided by the regional nurse consultant (RNC) on 8/17/21 at 5:00 p.m. The policy revealed in pertinent part, In a healthcare community, in most instances, the Complaint/Grievance Officer is the Social services director or other appropriate designee. The Complaint/grievance officer provides oversight of the grievance process, including: -Receiving and tracking grievances through their conclusions; -staying in periodic contact with the person who filed the grievance until the matter is investigated, and a plan is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for five (#65, #50, #37, #20, #34) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide bathing according to the resident's preferences for Resident #65, #50, #37, #20 and #34. Cross-reference F725 for sufficient staffing. Findings include: 1. Resident #65 A. Resident status Resident #65, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, muscle weakness and hypothyroidism. The 7/28/21 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) unknown out of 15 because resident was rarely or never understood. He required two or more persons total assistance with bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five (#18, #50, #35, #37, and #56) of five out of 32 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered plan. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Follow physician orders for medication administration for Resident #18, #50, and #1; -Ensure glucometer audits were completed to maintain accuracy for Resident #56; -Notify nurse regarding a change in condition for Resident #37 observed by two other staff members; and, -Provided needed resources to prevent a decline for Resident #35. Finding include: I. Need resources to prevent decline Resident #35 A. Resident status: Resident #35, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and obesity. The 6/16/21 minimum data set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure three (#24, #22 and #65) out of five residents with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment and assistance to improve maintain and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) out of 32 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #24 and #65 received restorative range of motion exercises according to their plan of care; and, -Ensure Resident #22 received restorative nursing services and splinting assistance (palm guards) per therapy recommendations, to improve, maintain or prevent worsening of contractures and protect skin integrity. Findings include: I. Resident #24 A. Resident status Resident #24, under the age of 65, was most recently admitted on [DATE] from hospital after several years in the facility. According to the August 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), the diagnoses included quadriplegia, hypertension, contractures of right and left hand, wrist, and feet and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — patternEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services for one (#22) of two residents reviewed for enteral nutrition out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide enteral feedings according to the physician orders for Resident #22 Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Enteral Nutrition Guidelines policy, last revised 9/1/18, was provided by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 8/24/21 at 8:41 a.m. It read in pertinent parts, The nurse administers the enteral feeding regimen according to formula, system, type and method of delivery ordered by the physician. Physician's orders are documented in the medical record and include the following: -Size and type of tube; -Insertion of tube and frequency of change (if applicable); -Name of formula, total calories, and flow rate. Total volume in a 24 hour period; -Method of administration (gravity, bolus, pump); -Amount and frequency of water to flush the tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five (#56, #50, #35, #31, #61) of seven out of 32 sample residents received the necessary respiratory care as ordered by the physician. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure oxygen tubing was replaced and labeled for Resident #56, #50, #31, and #61; -Replace damaged oxygen tubing for Resident #35; and, -Ensure residents oxygen administration orders were followed for Resident #31, #56, and #61. I. Facility policy The care and handling of respiratory equipment policy, last updated on 9/17/18, was provided by the regional nurse consultant on 8/17/21 at 11:00 a.m. by the regional nurse consultant (RNC). It indicated, in pertinent part: Equipment should be changed based on the following schedule/manufacturers recommendation or state regulations: Change weekly: Nasal cannula and humidifier. Nasal cannulas were required to be changed weekly. When the oxygen tubing or other respiratory equipment was changed the staff were to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate social services for six (#2, #16, #44, #35, #18 and #31) out seven of 32 sample residents to meet the needs and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #2 received eye glasses; and, -Ensure Resident #16, #44, #35, #18 and #31 received timely dental services. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Concrete Needs Policy, last revised on 9/2/18, was received by the regional nurse consultant (RNC) on 8/17/21 at 5:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part that the social services department was dedicated to assist the residents to obtain needed adaptive and other medical necessary items, with an example of dentures. II. Eye glasses 1. Resident #2 A. Resident status Resident #2, age [AGE], was admitted [DATE]. According to the August 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included, unspecified fracture of shaft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with currently accepted professional standards in three out of five medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to label inhalers, insulins, eye drops and remove expired medication from three medication carts according to manufacturer instructions. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Storage of Medications policy and procedures, revised 1/1/13, was provided by the regional nurse consultant (RNC) on 1/18/21 at 1:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Facility should ensure medications and biologicals: have an expiration date on the label, have not been retained longer than recommended by manufacturer or supplier guidelines or have not been contaminated or deteriorated, are stored separated from other medications until destroyed or returned to the pharmacy or suppliers. Once any mediation or biological package is opened, the facility should follow manufacturer/suppliers guidelines with respect to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an alleged violation of abuse to the State survey and certification agency in accordance with State law for one resident (#2) out of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 32 sample residents. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse policy, dated 3/13/13, was received on 8/18/21 by a regional nurse consultant. The policy read in pertinent parts, the following qualify for reportable incidents, allegations of abuse or neglect, which includes physical, verbal and neglect. II. Failure to report alleged violations of abuse to the State Survey and Certification Agency involving Resident #2. (Cross-reference F610) The Grievance Form for Resident #2, dated 6/1/21, was provided by the social service director (SSD) on 8/11/21 at approximately 2:00 p.m. The grievance form revealed it was reported to the social service director on 6/1/21, documented, Resident #2 said a licensed nurse shook his fists at me. The form documented this had been going on for a while. The documentation of follow-up revealed the director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-08-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an alleged violation of physical abuse for one (#2) of two allegations reviewed out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an allegation of physical abuse reported by Resident #2. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 3/13/13, was received on 8/18/21 by a regional nurse consultant. The policy read in pertinent part, An investigation is a formal and systematic collection and review of available evidence and factual information that seeks to describe or explain an event or series of events. The goal of every investigation are to: (1) Obtain as much factual information as possible in an effort to reconstruct and evaluate an incident, event or circumstance; (2) provide the possible, as to how and why an incident occured or whether an allegatio can or cannot be substantiated; (3) determine what remedial and/or corrective action ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for two (#12 and #22) of three out of 32 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide personalized activity programs for Resident #12 and #22 as documented in the care plan. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activity policy, initiated on 9/1/14, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/24/21 at 9:00 a.m. It documented in pertinent partthe community will provide space, supplies, equipment and the staff support necessary for social physical, educational and leisurely activities, both within and outside the community, that are planned according to the preferences, needs and abilities of residents. The community will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (#12) of five residents reviewed for falls out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the fall mat was in place when the resident was in bed to prevent injury as according to the care plan. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall management and investigation policy dated 9/18/18 was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA). It read in pertinent parts, Five stars utilizes all reasonable efforts to provide a system to review residents potential risk for falls and provide a proactive program of supervision, assistive devices and interventions to manage and minimize falls and identify resident's continued needs. Care plan is developed that addresses potential risk factors for falls and recommended interventions. Fall interventions are documented in the resident record. II. Resident status Resident #12, age [AGE], was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2021-08-18 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received notices orally and in writing which included a written description of their legal rights. Specifically, the facility failed to have the required posted information written in a readable font size and placed in an area that had ease of access for the residents. Findings include: A. Resident interviews An individual resident council interview with two out of three residents selected by the facility was completed on 8/17/21 at 2:30 p.m. Resident #18 said she was unsure where to locate the information in the facility on how to file a complaint with the state. She said that she would have to ask a staff member to help her locate the phone number if needed or use her personal cell phone to search for the information herself. Resident #34 said she was unaware of how to file a complaint with the state. She was not aware where the information was posted. B. Observation Postings were located in one location at the front of the building across from the administration offices. The postings were located on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable homelike environment for one resident (#44) out of 32 total residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #44's bathroom was sanitary and safe for the resident to use Findings include: A Observations On 8/11/21 at 9:12 a.m., Resident #44 bathroom had a black substance on the base of the walls where it met the floor. The baseboards were stripped away from about 75 percent of the walls and had a black substance on one side of them. There were several wipes with the black substance in a pile with the baseboards. The floor had a black substance around the back and sides. The toilet bowl had concentrated urine with toilet paper with some black substance in it The bathroom had a foul smell of mold and urine. Resident #44 resided in the room and was unable to use the toilet because of the bathroom conditions. -At 10:25 a.m. the two staff members moved Resident #44 with her packed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$55,908 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $24,245 — penalty dated 2025-07-16
- $31,663 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to STELLAR SENIOR LIVING — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.3 | +1.7 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as a real-estate investment trust (REIT). That’s a fact worth knowing: peer-reviewed research links private-equity and REIT ownership to lower staffing and more citations on average — though any individual home can run well or poorly regardless. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. — investment firm · 5.97% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- BLACKROCK INC — investment firm · 7.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- SPTMNR PROPERTIES TRUST — REIT · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
- FLAT FOOTED LLC — investment firm · 9.77% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- ABP TRUST — REIT · 9.67% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- VANGUARD GROUP INC — investment firm · 8.35% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- H/2 SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES IV L.P. — investment firm · 6.20% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMNR PROPERTIES TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2024 |
| CHARLES SCHWAB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/22/2024 |
| D.E. SHAW & CO., L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/22/2024 |
| DIVERSIFIED HEALTHCARE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2020 |
| H/2 SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES IV L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/22/2024 |
| SNH PROJ LINCOLN TRS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2024 |
| SNH TRS LICENSEE HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2020 |
| SNH TRS, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2020 |
| BILOTTO, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| PORTNOY, ADAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| BROWN, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| CLARK, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| ABP TRUST | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| BLACKROCK INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| FLAT FOOTED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| STELLAR CEDARS MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| STELLAR SENIOR LIVING B LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| STELLAR V LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/14/2025 |
| VANGUARD GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/22/2024 |
| BENTON, EVRETT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2021 |
| BRANSON, MARISSA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2021 |
| ESFAHANI, REZA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MAKELKY, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065202. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.