Rio Grande Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
39 Calle Miller, La Jara, CO 81140 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (719) 274-3311 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $54,946 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-06)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.1% | 4.7% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 54.5% | 8.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.2% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 52.2% | 11.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 21.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.8% | 20.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.7% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.87 | 1.38 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.19 | 1.74 | 1.80 | worse |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.3%CMS range 27.8–53.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.0–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 2.9–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 48.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.480 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-11-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#2) of seven residents reviewed for foley catheter care and catheter assessments out of eleven sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff were appropriately trained in the care needs of a resident with quadriplegia and effectively monitoring Resident #2, who had an indwelling foley catheter for signs and symptoms of urinary retention. This resulted in the resident being transferred to the hospital where she was admitted to the hospital's intensive care unit for a higher level of care. Resident #2, was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of quadriplegia, acute renal failure, dementia, dysfunctional bladder and severe cognitive impairment. Resident #2 was admitted with an indwelling foley catheter for continuous bladder drainage. On 10/31/25 at 5:29 a.m. a night shift CNA documented Resident #2 had a urine output…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from abuse for one (#10) of three residents reviewed for abuse out of 11 sample residents.Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of autistic disorder, dementia and depression.Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and schizophrenia (mental illness).On 9/7/25, Resident #10 entered the facility from outside. Resident #11 approached Resident #10 and pushed him to the floor. Resident #10 complained of left leg pain and was transferred to the hospital where he was diagnosed with a femur fracture that required surgical repair. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Resident #10 from physical abuse by Resident #11.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Rights, dated December 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/3/25 at 2:30 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on , observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for two (#1 and #2) of five residents reviewed for wound care and weekly skin assessments out of 11 sample residents.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a diagnosis of heart failure, multiple sclerosis, dementia and diabetes. Resident #1 had a history of hemorrhoids and was receiving as needed topical medication. Upon admission to the hospital on [DATE], it was discovered that Resident #1 had a perianal abscess which required surgery and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Review of the facility documentation revealed the facility failed to complete skin assessments to monitor the status of the resident's hemorrhoids. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Complete weekly skin assessments for Resident #1, who had developed a perianal abscess; and,-Obtain wound care physician's orders for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff did not touch ready-to-eat food with their bare hands; -Ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene during meal service;-Ensure expired food was discarded;-Ensure equipment was in good repair; and,-Ensure artificial nails and jewelry were not worn. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene and did not touch ready-to-eat foods with bare hands during meal service.A. Professional referenceThe Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised 3/16/24, was retrieved on 4/29/26. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation, including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0555 — patternHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (#15, #28 and #30) of five residents out of 31 sample residents had the right to choose their own attending physician. Specifically, the facility failed to allow Resident #15, Resident #28 and Resident #30 to choose their primary care physician while the resident resided in the facility.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Choice of Attending Physician policy and procedure, revised November 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 5:09 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents have the right to choose their own attending physician or licensed healthcare provider who meets the requirements and responsibilities of an attending physician/provider. If the resident does not choose their own physician or provider, the resident is informed in writing of the name, specialty, and contact information of their attending physician or provider during the admission process, any time the information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#1, #41, #34 and #22) of nine residents were free from chemical restraints out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Document a physician's rationale for Resident #1, #41, and #34's psychotropic medications in order to justify the continued use of the medications;-Document resident specific care approaches, to include medication specific target behaviors and person-centered interventions for Resident #1, #41, and #34's psychotropic medications; and, -Ensure Resident #22's as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication had corresponding documentation of identified behaviors and use of non-pharmological interventions.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised February 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 10:09 a.m. It read in pertinent part,Behavioral and other non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-22 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing for three (#34, #1 and #5) of five residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure expressions of suicidal ideations were addressed in order to secure Resident #34's safety;-Ensure Resident #1, who had a history of trauma and suicidal ideations, was monitored for signs and symptoms of suicidal ideation; and, -Ensure individualized care approaches were provided and monitored with ongoing assessment for Resident #5 in order to meet the emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident.Findings include: I. Failed to monitor and address suicidal ideations for Resident #34 and Resident #1 A. Resident #34 1. Resident status Resident #34, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026 computerized physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases on two of four hallways.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure hand hygiene was performed appropriately when incontinence care was provided to Resident #2; -Ensure the vital signs equipment was disinfected between residents; and, -Ensure blood sugar glucometers were disinfected appropriately between residents.Findings include:I. Failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed appropriately when incontinence care was provided to Resident #2A. Facility policy and procedureThe Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, dated December 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 10:25 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Hand hygiene is the primary means for preventing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Hand hygiene is indicated: before touching a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews on record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#35 and #41) of three residents reviewed for Medicare or Medicaid covered services out of 31 sample residents were notified of changes in their services covered, including their financial responsibility and their appeal rights. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #35 was provided notification that his Medicare Part A covered skilled services were ending within the required time parameter; -Ensure Resident #41's representative was provided written notification of the Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letter when Resident #41's Medicare Part A covered skilled services were ending; and,-Ensure Resident #41's representative was notified of the right to appeal when the resident's Medicare Part A covered skilled services were ending.Findings include: I. Resident #35 A. Resident status Resident #35, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for two (#3 and #7) of two residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, for Resident #3 and Resident #7, the facility failed to:-Ensure that the resident's representatives were informed of the potential risks and benefits of a wanderguard (a wearable device that helps prevent residents from eloping from the facility);-Ensure the wanderguard was the least restrictive approach for the residents;,-Ensure the residents' wanderguards were monitored for continued use; and,-Develop and implement interventions for reducing the restraint.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Tab Alarms, Bed Alarms, Wanderguard System policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 6:38 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The wanderguard will be used for residents at risk for elopement. For each resident to reach his/her highest practicable well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided services that met professional standards of quality for one (#5) of nine residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5, who was receiving an anticoagulant medication (blood thinner), received international normalized ratio (INR) blood draws (a blood test that measures how long it takes the blood to clot) per the physician's orders.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to Shikdar, Sufana et al., International Normalized Ratio (INR): Assessment, Monitoring, and Clinical Implications, StatPearls Publishing, (2025), retrieved on 4/27/26 from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507707/, The INR is the preferred parameter for monitoring patients taking vitamin K antagonists. This variable is also used to assess the risk of bleeding and to evaluate the coagulation (clotting) status of these patients. Individuals on oral anticoagulants must monitor their INR values to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide supervision, assistance, services, and implement effective person-centered interventions to prevent falls for one (#34) of five residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 31 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to thoroughly assess Resident #34's falls to reduce individual risks and ineffective interventions.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Fall- Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 10:09 a.m. It read in pertinent part,The staff and practitioner will review each resident's risk factors for falling and document in the medical record. Examples of risk factors for falling include lightheadedness or dizziness, multiple medications, musculoskeletal abnormalities, peripheral neuropathy, gait and balance disorders, cognitive impairment, weakness, environmental hazards, confusion, visual impairment, hypotension, and medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required dialysis services received services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#2) of one resident reviewed for dialysis out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff was assessing and documenting on Resident #2's dialysis fistula (the connection between an artery and a vein for hemodialysis) site on a routine basis.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to Lok, [NAME], et al., Hemodialysis Vascular Access: Core Curriculum 2025, American Journal of Kidney Foundation, (2025), retrieved on 4/28/26 from https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386%2824%2900976-4/fulltext#:~:text=Intraoperative%20mapping%20by%20the%20operator,both%20systolic%20and%20diastolic%20components.&text=Abbreviations:%20CABG%2C%20coronary%20artery%20bypass,PICC%2C%20peripherally%20inserted%20central%20catheter, An arteriovenous fistula (AVF), created by an anastomosis (surgical connection)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a rationale to act upon the pharmacist's recommendations in a timely manner for one (#15) of nine residents out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a rationale for not acting upon the pharmacist's recommendations for Resident #15.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication Regimen Reviews policy and procedure, revised 2/25, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/22/26 at 10:10 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Upon receiving the medication recommendation report (MRR) from the pharmacist, the physician reviews and responds to the report. The physician documents in the resident's medical record that the pharmacist's recommendation has been reviewed and what actions were taken to address them. II. Resident #15A. Resident status Resident #15, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for one (#34) of four residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship out of 31 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #34's antibiotic therapy for a potential urinary tract infection (UTI) was discontinued in a timely manner after the facility received a negative urine culture and sensitivity (C&S - a test that identifies the organism in the urine and determines the most effective antibiotic therapy) report.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, (2024), retrieved on 4/27/26 from https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/hcp/core-elements/nursing-homes-antibiotic-stewardship.html, To track how and why antibiotics are prescribed, providers perform reviews on resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from involuntary seclusion not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one (#2) of one out of seven sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was not told to go to her room or taken to her room as punishment for her behaviors. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Rights policy, revised December 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/24/2 at 3:20 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Federal and state laws guarantee certain rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to a dignified existence, to be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity, to be free from involuntary seclusion, to be supported by the facility in exercising resident rights, and to have equal access to quality care.II. Resident #2A. Resident statusResident #2, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide person-centered dementia care and services for two (#2 and #1) of seven residents reviewed for dementia care out of seven sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Implement appropriate person-centered dementia interventions for Resident #2; and,-Implement person-centered dementia interventions for Resident #1.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedureThe Dementia Clinical Protocol policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/24/2 at 3:20 p.m. It read in pertinent part, For individuals with dementia, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize function and quality of life.Direct care staff will support the resident with initiating and completing activities and tasks of daily living. The IDT will identify and document resident condition and level of support needed during care planning and review changing needs as they arise. The physician will order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four of four staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility had not completed annual performance reviews and/or provided regular in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews for certified nurse aide (CNA) #2, CNA #3, CNA #4 and CNA #5. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #2 (hired on 5/24/19), CNA #3 (hired on 12/8/10), CNA #4 (hired on 7/22/10) and CNA #5 (hired on 4/29/14) did not have an annual performance review completed. The CNAs did not have an in-service education plan based on the outcome of the review. II. Interview The nursing home administrator (NHA) was interviewed on 3/21/24 at 1:10 p.m. She said she could not locate the performance reviews for CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #4 and CNA #5. She said she was not aware the performance reviews needed to include a regular in-service plan based on the outcome of these reviews. She said going forward she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#36, #40 and #49) of five residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Implement effective individualized behavior monitoring in the medical record to determine the efficacy of psychoactive medications for Residents #36, #40 and #49; and, -Ensure consents to review the risks versus benefits were in place prior to administration of psychotropic medications for Residents #40 and #49. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Psychopharmacological policy, dated July 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/25/24 at 11:57 a.m. It read in pertinent part: Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: -Anti-psychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety medications; and hypnotics. Residents, families and/or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) level II determination and evaluation from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#31) of three residents reviewed for PASRR out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to arrange and incorporate recommendations from the PASRR level II notice of determination for Resident #31. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #31, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included bipolar disorder, anxiety and Huntington's disease (a genetic disease causing progressive degeneration of the nerve cells in the brain). The 1/7/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15. The assessment revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision and hearing abilities for two (#54 and #40) of three residents reviewed for vision and hearing out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #54 had an eye exam; and, -Resident #40 obtained necessary hearing devices. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Care of Visually Impaired Resident policy, revised March 2021, was received by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/25/24 at 11:56 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents with visual impairment will be assisted with activities of daily living as appropriate. Assistive devices to maintain vision include glasses, contact lenses, magnifying lenses and any other devices used by the resident to assist with visual impairment. While it is not required that our facility provide devices to assist with vision, it is our responsibility to assist the resident and representatives in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (#26) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 had an order for a medication (icy hot) found at his bedside. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #58, age below 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the March 2024 computerized physicians orders (CPO), diagnoses included autistic disorder, dementia and fibromyalgia. The 1/12/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident's cognitive status was intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. II. Observation and interview The icyhot was at the bedside on 3/20/24 at 9:45 a.m. The icy hot was at the bedside on 3/21/24 at 10:00 a.m. Registered nurse (RN) #2 said icyhot was considered a medication. She said Resident #26 did not have an order for the icy hot nor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident in obtaining routine or emergency dental services, as needed for one (#54) of three residents reviewed for dental care out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure dental services were offered to Resident #54. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Dental Services policy, revised December 2016, was received by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/25/24 at 11:56 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Routine and 24 hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents through: -A contract agreement with a licensed dentist that comes to the facility monthly; -Referral to the resident's personal dentist; -Referral to community dentists; or -Referral to other health care organizations that provide dental services. All dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures related to pneumococcal immunizations for one (#17) of three residents reviewed for vaccinations of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17 was offered the secondary pneumococcal immunization. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations website, revised 9/21/23, retrieved on 3/27/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/recommendations.html read in pertinent part, CDC recommends routine administration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV15 or PCV20) for all adults 65 years or older who have never received any pneumococcal conjugate vaccine or whose previous vaccination history is unknown: If PCV15 is used, this should be followed by a dose of PPSV23 one year later. The minimum interval is 8 weeks and can be considered in adults with an immunocompromising…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one of one kitchen and for one (#41) of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Appropriate hand hygiene by food service staff; -The freezer temperature was below zero degrees Fahrenheit; and -Outdated ready-to-eat foods were removed from Resident #41's room in a timely manner. Findings include: I. Improper hand hygiene A. Professional references According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code (2017), pp. 48-50, foodservice staff shall use the following handwashing procedures: -Rinse under clean, running warm water; -Apply an amount of cleaning compound recommended by the cleaning compound manufacturer; -Rub together vigorously for at least 10 to 15 seconds while paying particular attention to removing soil from underneath the fingernails and creating friction on the surfaces of the hands and arms fingertips, and areas between the fingers; -Thoroughly rinse under clean, running warm water;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-11-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to have a comprehensive facility assessment. Findings include: I. Facility assessment Review of the facility assessment (FA) revealed it was not a comprehensive assessment of the facility's resources necessary to provide daily care to the resident population. The FA was updated on 8/8/19 and reviewed by the quality assurance (QA) committee on 8/23/19. The FA failed to identify the staff competencies necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population; the physical environment, equipment, services, and other physical plant considerations necessary to care for this population; any ethnic, cultural, or religious factors that may potentially affect the care provided by the facility including, but not limited to, activities and food and nutrition services; the facility's resources,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-11-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain readily accessible medical records for each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to have access to all electronic records during the recertification survey. Findings include: I. Notification Upon arrival to the facility on [DATE] at 9:20 a.m, the nursing home administrator (NHA) informed the survey team the electronic medical records (EMRs) system used by the facility had been hacked and were being held for ransom across the country. She said all facilities that utilized the EMR system the facility utilized were experiencing the same problem. On 11/18/19 at 9:46 a.m. the NHA informed the survey team the virtual control program interface (VCPI) had been breached and it prevented the facility from accessing all EMRs and emails. She assured the team the facility would continue to work and provide quality of care to the residents. She explained the system went down sometime in the early morning on 11/14/19. She said the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-11-20 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide training to all staff, at a minimum, on dementia management and abuse prevention. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure one of two registered nurses (RNs) reviewed received dementia management training and abuse prevention training; -Ensure two of three certified medication aide (CMAs) reviewed received dementia training and one of three received abuse training; and -Ensure four of six certified nurse aides (CNAs) reviewed received dementia management training, and one of six received abuse prevention training. Findings include: I. Training review The November 2019 staffing schedule was provided on 11/18/19 by the nursing home administrator (NHA). A sample of two RNs, three CMAs and six CNAs included on the schedule were reviewed for compliance with training requirements. Training records revealed: -RN #2 did not have current dementia management training and RN #1 did not have current abuse prevention training. -CMAs #1 and #3 did not have current dementia management training and CMA #2 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-20 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to inform four (#21, #100, #37, and #99) of four residents reviewed for liability notices and beneficiary appeal rights, out of 23 sample residents, both orally and in writing in a language that the residents understood, of their rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during their stay in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Obtain a signature from the residents' authorized representatives on liability notices provided for Residents #21 and #100, who were unable to understand the information due to severe cognitive impairment; and -Provide notification of Medicare Non-Coverage letters to the beneficiary/representative after verbal notification of Medicare covered services ended for Residents #37 and #99. Findings include: I. Notice of non-coverage regulatory reference The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (form CMS-10123) letters, also called Non-Coverage letters, Expedited Appeal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to inform residents on how and to whom a grievance or complaint could be filed. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide information to the residents on how to file a grievance; -Ensure the residents had access to the information on how to file a grievance; and -Inform the residents of the name and role of the grievance official. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Lost, Misplaced or Damaged Items policy, undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/20/19 at 1:22 p.m., and read in part: It is the policy of the facility to maintain all personal belongings for each resident in good condition and located in the appropriate storage areas. When an item or article of clothing is lost, misplaced or damaged, the facility will investigate the problem until the item is found, relocated or repaired when necessary. When a resident, family member, friend, or staff member discovers something missing, the following procedure should be followed: Report missing items to social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to protect from and prevent abuse for seven (#38, #18, #8, #22, #21, #40 and #5) of seven residents reviewed of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to protect Resident #38 from abuse by Resident #46; and -Failed to protect Residents #18, #8, #22, #21 and #40 from verbal and physical abuse from Resident #5, and Resident #5 from bullying and potential retaliatory abuse by other residents. Cross-reference F610, the facility failed to report to state authorities and investigate incidents and allegations of verbal and physical abuse. Cross-reference to F943, the facility failed to provide training to all staff at a minimum on abuse prevention and dementia management. Findings include: I. Resident #38 A. Resident status Resident #38, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included type II diabetes mellitus (DMII) and insomnia. The 8/26/19 minimum data set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged abuse/neglect violations were thoroughly investigated for nine (#46, #38, #98, #5, #18, #8, #22, #21 and #40) of nine residents reviewed of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to thoroughly investigate two altercations caused by Resident #46 towards Residents #38 and #98; and -Failed to investigate verbal and physical abuse by Resident #5 towards Residents #18, #8, #22, #21 and #40. Cross-reference to F600, the facility failed to protect residents from verbal and physical abuse. Cross-reference to F943, the facility failed to provide training to all staff at a minimum on dementia management and abuse prevention. Findings include: I. Resident #46 A. Resident status Resident #46, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included depression and malignant neoplasm of prostate. The [DATE] minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored in one (AB hall cart) of two medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure there were no expired medications in the AB hall medication cart; and -Ensure the AB hall medication cart was free from loose tablets at the bottom of the cart. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Medication policy and procedure, undated, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/19/19 at 11:55 a.m., read in part medication storage shall be properly and safely maintained in accordance with the security requirements of federal, state, and local laws. Individual medications ordered for the patient by the physician shall be dispensed by the pharmacy, and identified with the patient's name, dosage, frequency and date on these containers. II. Loose tablets On 11/19/19 at 9:59 a.m. the AB hallway medication cart was reviewed with certified medication aide (CMA) #3, and the following was observed: -Three loose white oval half tablets were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure proper hand hygiene while cleaning residents' rooms; and -Ensure proper hand hygiene during medication administration. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Infection Control Hand Washing policy and procedure, undated, was provided by the environmental director (ED) on 11/20/19 at 10:08 a.m. It read in part, all personnel working in the facility are required to wash their hands before and after resident contact, before and after performing procedures, and when hands become soiled. II. Housekeeping observations On 11/20/19 at 8:09 a.m., environmental aide (EA) #3 was observed cleaning room E4 and the following observations were made: -After cleaning the toilet of room E4, EA #3 did not remove gloves to perform hand hygiene. -After cleaning the toilet of room E4, while still gloved, EA #3 went into the hallway and opened the housekeeping cart to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience and the least restrictive alternatives were used for one (#5) of three residents reviewed for assistive devices out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to re-evaluate the ongoing use of a personal restraint; and -Failed to have a comprehensive care plan addressing the use of the restraint. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Restraint and Position Change Alarm Use Policy, revised November 2017, provided by the regional clinical consultant (RCC) on 6/3/19 at 3:13 p.m., included: The use of a physical restraint required consultation with an appropriate health professional such as an occupational or physical therapist. The use of less restrictive devices must be documented in the medical record prior to using the physical restraint. -A restraint shall not be used for discipline, as punishment, for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY II. Resident #21 A. Resident status Resident #21, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, depressive episodes, and chronic kidney disease. The 9/16/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of six out of 15. Depressed mood with behavior symptoms were noted. He required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toileting. He required limited assistance with transfers and personal hygiene. B. Record review The care plan, initiated 10/1/18 and revised 7/15/19, identified depression and negative statements and requires antidepressant and antipsychotic medication. Interventions included: medication review quarterly for possible reduction or discontinuance, monitor behavior of self-isolation, and pharmacy consultant review monthly. The October 2019 CPO revealed the following: -Seroquel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-20 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure qualified staff persons in accordance with each resident's written plan of care provided care for one (#5) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) assess Resident #5 following an unwitnessed fall. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Scope of Practice-Registered Nurse (RN) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Title 12, Professions and Occupations, Article 38, Nurses, Colorado Revised Statutes (July 1, 2013) retrieved from https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/[NAME]/Nursing_Laws: -Delegation of nursing function is limited to patients that are stable and where the outcome of the task is predictable. -Assessment function of an LPN includes collecting, reporting and recording objective/subjective data, observing condition or change of condition, and collecting and reporting signs and symptoms of deviation from normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents were provided, for one (#46) of three residents reviewed for falls out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to keep the room door open, when care was not being provided, for Resident #46 who had a high risk for falls. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #46, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and depressive disorder. The 11/4/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of one out of 15. Extensive assistance was needed for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. II. Record review The care plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure no unnecessary psychotropic medication usage for one (#3) of five residents reviewed out of 23 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess for the continued use of Lorazepam as needed (PRN) drug for Resident #3. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Chemical and Physical Restraint policy and procedure, undated, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/20/19 at 2:00 p.m., read in part, the resident has the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed and psychoactive drugs administered. Orders for restraints shall not be enforced for longer than 12 hours unless the resident's condition worsens and the care plan should indicate the specific period of time for the use of the chemical restraint. Assessment of the restraint rationale would be continually documented. II. Resident #3 status Resident #3, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2019 computerized physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$54,946 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $39,163 — penalty dated 2025-11-06
- $15,783 — penalty dated 2024-03-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CENTENNIAL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTENNIAL MN TR I | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 18% | since 09/01/2022 |
| SINGER, MEIR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/01/2022 |
| DUKE, JACOB | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2026 |
| GOTTLIEB, REFOEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2022 |
| TURPEN, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065399. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.