Rock Creek Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure two (#25 and #35) of eight out of 24 sample residents were kept free from abuse.Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #25 from verbal abuse from Resident #3 on 12/15/25 and 12/21/25, which caused psychosocial distress for Resident #25; and,-Protect Resident #35 from verbal abuse from Resident #3 on 12/23/25 and 12/31/25, which caused Resident #35 to become tearful after both incidents. Resident #3, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], was known to have verbally aggressive behaviors toward others and had been involved in verbal altercations with other residents.On 12/15/25 Resident #3 verbally abused Resident #25 in the dining room by yelling foul language, making threatening comments and moving aggressively toward Resident #25. The facility placed both residents on 15-minute checks and educated staff regarding de-escalation techniques. However, six days later, on 12/21/25, Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards received adequate supervision out of four sample residents.Resident #1, who was dependent on facility staff for wheelchair mobility, sustained a fall from her wheelchair on [DATE], which resulted in a cervical spine fracture.During the facility's investigation of the fall, it was discovered that staff failed to attach the foot pedals to Resident #1's wheelchair. As a result, Resident #1 was unable to rest her feet on the foot pedals while being transported. On [DATE], while Resident #1 was being transported from the dining room to her room, Resident #1 caught her foot/feet on the rug, fell forward out of the wheelchair, and hit her head on the floor as she fell.Due to the facility's failure to ensure staff used wheelchair safety equipment/foot pedals, Resident #1 sustained a fall on [DATE], which resulted in a cervical (C1) spine fracture. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accidents and hazards for two (#16 and #4) of four residents reviewed for falls out of 17 sample residents. Resident #16, who was at high risk for falls, sustained 17 falls from 9/4/23 to 1/31/24. The facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented after each fall and implement effective interventions when they were added. The resident, who required maximum assistance with toileting according to her care plan, often fell trying to go to the bathroom. Due to the facility's failures to implement effective interventions, Resident #16 had a major injury on 1/9/24 when she fell trying to go to the bathroom which required hospital treatment for a head laceration where she had two staples. Observations during the survey from 2/5/24 to 2/8/24 revealed the facility had not consistently implemented fall interventions. In addition, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were utilized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Maintain the kitchen in a sanitary condition;-Maintain the ice machine in a sanitary condition; and,-Ensure food items were properly covered, labeled, dated and discarded within appropriate use-by timeframes.Findings include:I. Failure to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary conditionA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), retrieved on 5/27/26, read in pertinent part, The physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. (6-501.12) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. (4-601.11) Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris. (4-601.11) The premises shall be free of items that are unnecessary to the operation or maintenance of the establishment. (6-501.114)B. ObservationsThe initial tour of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to take appropriate corrective actions, as a result of abuse investigations, for four of nine abuse allegations. Specifically, the facility failed to take appropriate corrective action following the investigations of four verbal abuse incidents by Resident #3 towards Resident #25 on 12/15/25 and 12/21/25, and Resident #35 on 12/23/25 and 12/31/25, to ensure that verbal abuse did not recur.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating policy and procedure, revised 9/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 5/21/26 at 11:32 a.m. It read in pertinent part, All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The administrator provides supporting documents and evidence related to the alleged incident to the individual in charge of the investigation. The individual conducting the investigation reviews the documentation as evidence, reviews the resident's medical record to determine the resident's physical and cognitive status at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints for one (#7) of five residents out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7, who was receiving an antipsychotic medication, received appropriate monitoring to ensure signs and symptoms of tardive dyskinesia (involuntary movements that can be caused by taking antipsychotic medications) did not worsen.Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the National Institute of Health (NIH) National Library of Medicine's Impact of A Pharmacist-Driven Tardive Dyskinesia Screening Process (7/16/21), retrieved on 5/26/26 from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8287863/#s1, According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), tardive dyskinesia (TD) is defined as involuntary movements generally of the tongue, lower face, jaw, torso, and extremities that are developed from the use of antipsychotics. These movements…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient discharge preparation for one (#22) of one resident reviewed for a safe and orderly discharge out of 24 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a written bed hold notice was provided to Resident #22 and/or her representative at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Bed-Holds and Returns policy, revised [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 11:57 a.m. It read in pertinent part, All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). The written bed-hold notices provided to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who required respiratory care received care consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#10) of two residents out of 24 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to maintain, clean, sanitize and properly store Resident #10's nebulizer machine (breathing treatment device) and mask.Findings include:I. Resident #10A. Resident statusResident #10, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic lung disease), dependence on supplemental oxygen, and hypertension (high blood pressure).The 3/3/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. The MDS assessment documented the resident used continuous oxygen therapy.B. Resident interview and observationsResident #10 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an effective pain management regimen in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice, resident-centered care plans, and resident preferences for one (#37) of one resident reviewed for pain out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure a thorough pain assessment was completed that identified Resident #37's history of pain and its treatment, history of addiction, characteristics of pain and the impact of pain on the resident's quality of life; -Identify Resident #37's goals for pain management and the resident's acceptable level of pain; -Ensure Resident #37's location of pain was consistently identified when administering pain medication to the resident; and, -Ensure Resident #37's pain medication was administered as ordered and needed, based on the resident's observed status.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Pain Assessment and Management policy and procedure, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well being for one (#3) of seven residents out of 24 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify Resident #3's history of depression to monitor and provide ongoing assessment to determine whether the care approaches met the emotional and psychosocial needs of the resident.Findings include: I. Resident #3 A. Resident status Resident #3, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the May 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance and depressive disorder.The 3/10/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 11 out of 15. He required partial assistance with bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for acute changes in condition out of four sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to timely notify the physician and intervene to treat high blood pressure for Resident #1.Findings include:I. Professional reference The article Hypertensive crisis: What are the symptoms? (2024) was retrieved on [DATE] from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/high-blood-pressure/expert-answers/hypertensive-crisis/faq-20058491?cjdata=MXxOfDB8WXww&cjevent=765460d1cfad11f082c907180a1cb829&cm_mmc=CJ-_-100357191-_-5250933-_-Evergreen+Link+for+Mayo+Clinic+Diet&utm_source=cj&utm_content=100357191&utm_capaign=3-months read in pertinent part; A hypertensive crisis is a sudden, severe increase in blood pressure. The blood pressure reading is 180/120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or greater. A hypertensive crisis is a medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for maintaining resident health records out of four sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physicians' progress notes for Resident #1 were available in the electronic medical record (EMR).Findings include:I. Resident #1A. Resident statusResident #1, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 6/8/25. According to the June 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease.The 5/8/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #1 was unable to complete the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #1 was assessed by staff to be severely impaired in cognition and daily decision-making. The assessment revealed Resident #1 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide response, action and rationale to residents involved in group grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively address, resolve and demonstrate the facility's response to grievances concerning staff, laundry and housekeeping. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance policy, which was undated, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/7/24 at 11:05 a.m. It read it pertinent part, All grievances, complaints, or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response. Upon receipt of a grievance or complaint, the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the administrator within five working days of receiving the grievance. The resident, or person filing the grievance on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and in writing)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$37,103 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-12-10
• $27,993 — penalty dated 2024-02-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTENNIAL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO