No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Trinidad Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

409 Benedicta Ave, Trinidad, CO 81082 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 119 certified beds · (719) 846-9291 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
400 Benedicta Ave #A · (719) 846-2206 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
824 E Main St · (719) 845-0069 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
135 E Main St
Park
E 2nd St @ S Walnut St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
412 Benedicta Ave · (719) 846-3369

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.5%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%4.7%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms47.7%8.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.7%13.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.2%11.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%94.7%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.1%20.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.8%75.6%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.621.381.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.151.741.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.5%CMS range 24.5–48.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.2–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.5–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
33.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 84.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-05)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2020-02-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from physical abuse for six (#3, #1, #7, #2, #5 and #6 ) of 9 residents reviewed for abuse out of nine sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to: -Protect Resident #3 from physical abuse by Resident #4;-Protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by Resident #2;-Protect Resident #7 and Resident #2 from physical abuse by each other; and,-Protect Resident #5 and Resident #6 from physical abuse by each other.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Abuse Investigating and Reporting policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/18/26 at 2:04 p.m. It read in pertinent part: All reports of resident abuse shall be reported and investigated by facility management.II. Incident of physical abuse of Resident #3 by Resident #4 on 9/25/25A. Facility investigationThe 9/25/25 facility investigation revealed that an altercation occurred between Resident #3 and Resident #4. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for failure to transcribe and initiate the physician's orders out of nine sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #'1 post hospitalization orders for hematoma care were entered into the electronic medical record (EMR) and followed. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Hematoma Aftercare procedure, undated, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 2:36 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Aftercare for a hematoma involves monitoring vital signs and neurological status, applying cold compresses, and promoting elevation of the affected area. Nurses should also assess for signs of complications like worsening pain or infection, carefully manage any anticoagulant medications as ordered by the physician. and educate the patient and family when to seek…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for maintaining resident health records out of nine sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physicians' progress notes for Resident #1 were available in the electronic medical record (EMR). Findings include:I. Resident #3A. Resident statusResident #3, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included history of stroke, left-sided paralysis, atrial fibrillation, epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, depression, chronic pain and mild intellectual disabilities.The 8/28/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for her activities of daily living.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the facility's kitchen and dining room. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure nourishment beverages in the main dining room and unit refrigerators were dated and labeled; -Ensure cooking utensils were dried appropriately; -Ensure food preparation area vents were free from hanging dust and lint; -Ensure the main dining room refrigerator maintained a safe operating temperature; and, -Ensure dented food cans were not used. Findings include: I. Ensure nourishment beverages in the main dining room and unit refrigerators were dated and labeled. A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (3/16/24) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, were retrieved on 6/13/24 from https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_RFE_Reg_6 CCR 1010-2_2024_EN.pdf. It read in pertinent part, Time/temperature control for safety food prepared and packaged by a food processing plant shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for four of four staff reviewed. Specifically, the facility had not completed annual performance reviews and/or provided regular in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews for certified nurse aide (CNA) #2, CNA #3, CNA #5 and CNA #6. Findings include: I. Record review CNA #2 (hired on 2/1/11), CNA #3 (hired on 7/26/11), CNA #5 (hired on 4/5/23) and CNA #6 (hired on 1/26/21) did not have an annual performance review completed. The CNAs did not have an in-service education plan based on the outcome of the review. II. Interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 6/4/24 at 12:30 p.m. The DON said she was not aware the performance reviews needed to include a regular in-service plan based on the outcome of the reviews. She said going forward she would ensure the performance reviews were completed annually to ensure the best care was being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care for one (#2) of one resident out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to invite Resident #2's representative to participate in the care conferences to review the resident's plan of care. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised March 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/5/24 at 12:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The interdisciplinary team is responsible for the development of resident care plans. The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. If it is determined that participation of the resident or representative is not practicable for development of the care plan, an explanation is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (#87) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #87 had an order for a medication (Aleve) found at his bedside or a self medication assessment. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #87, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician's order (CPO), diagnoses included difficulty walking, muscle weakness and abnormality of gait. The 5/15/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. II. Record review The care plan, initiated 5/7/24 and updated 5/14/24, identified the resident had activities of daily living (ADL) self care performance deficits. Interventions included supervising and assisting the resident with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#18 and #19) of four residents investigated for abuse out of 37 sample residents were kept free from physical abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent a physical altercation between Resident #93 and Resident #19, and, -Prevent a physical altercation between Resident #71 and Resident #18. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating policy, reviewed September 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/2/24 at 3:36 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Upon receiving any allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source, the administrator is responsible for determining what actions (if any) are needed for the protection of residents. All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The administrator initiates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#80) of three residents with skin conditions of 37 sample residents received the highest practicable treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to identify, assess, monitor and care plan a large growth on Resident #80's face. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #80, age over 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician's order (CPO), diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The 4/20/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15. II. Observation On 6/2/24 at 1:15 p.m. Resident #80 was observed to have a large growth that was approximately the size of a pear on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to use a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails for four (#27, #36, #40, and #70) of ten residents reviewed for bed rails out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, for Resident #27, #36, #40 and #70, the facility failed to: -Assess the resident for risk of entrapment prior to installing the bed rails; -Obtain consent, which included the risks versus benefits of bed rails, from the resident and/or the resident's representative prior to bed rail installation; and, -Conduct quarterly assessments of the bed rails to evaluate the safety and/or continued need for bed rails. Findings include: I. Professional reference The U.S. (United States) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Recommendations for Health Care Providers Using Adult Portable Bed Rails (2/27/23), was retrieved on 6/8/24 from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/adult-portable-bed-rail-safety/recommendations-health- care-providers-using-adult-portable-bed-rails.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three (#2, #21, #54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 37 sample residents were free from unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #2, Resident #21 and Resident #54 had appropriate non-pharmacological interventions for behaviors initiated; and, -Ensure informed consent, which included the risks associated with taking a psychotropic medication, were obtained from the resident or resident's representative before the resident's use of a psychotropic medication for Resident #2, Resident #21 and Resident #54. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised July 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/5/24 at 12:00 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Non-pharmacological approaches are used to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for the discontinuation of medications when possible.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the hospice services provided met professional standards and principles that applied to individuals providing services in the facility for one (#89) of five residents receiving hospice services out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to orient hospice aides to the facility, including the policies and procedures. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Hospice Program policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/5/24. It read in pertinent part, Ensuring that our facility staff provides orientation on the policies and procedures of the facility, including resident rights, appropriate forms, and record keeping requirements, to hospice staff furnishing care to the residents. II. Resident status Resident #89, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2024 computerized physician's orders (CPO), diagnoses included neoplasm of the prostate, chronic kidney disease and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure freedom from abuse for six (#14, #19, #29, #36, #37 and #66) of six residents reviewed out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to protect Residents #29, #37 and #66 from physical abuse by Resident #36 who was physically aggressive toward others and protect Resident #14 from physical abuse by Resident #19. Cross reference F609 failure to report abuse allegations. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The abuse policy entitled Resident safety dated 5/31/19 was sent via email by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/12/2020. It read, in pertinent part; It is the policy of our facility to maintain a work and living environment that is professional and free from threat and/or occurrence of harassment, abuse (verbal, mental or sexual), neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property; -Our facility promotes an atmosphere of sharing with residents and staff without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to report to the state survey and certification agency, in accordance with state law, five of five incidents of physical abuse stemming from resident-to-resident altercations in the memory care unit. The facility failure to report alleged abuse involved six (#14, #19, #29, #36, #37 and #66) of six residents reviewed for abuse reporting out of 52 sample residents. Cross-reference F600 Free from Abuse Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The abuse policy entitled Resident safety dated 2/1/11 was sent via email by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/12/12020 . It read, in pertinent part; any suspected, observed or reported violation of this resident safety policy will be reported to the supervisor on duty. The supervisor on duty shall report any suspected violations of this resident safety policy immediately to the administrator and to the director of nursing (DON) or their designee(s) as soon as practicable. The state Department of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-05 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of the bed hold policy before transfer to the hospital to the residents or their representatives in a sample of four ( #248, #63, #80 and #60) of four out of 52 total sample residents reviewed. Specifically the facility failed to ensure: Resident #248, #63, #80 and # 60 were informed,in writing of the bed hold policy, when they were transferred to the hospital from the facility. Findings include I. Policy The bed hold policy read, residents who were discharged or transferred from the facility to a hospital or other facility upon physician's orders or who leave the facility for any reason, medical or otherwise shall be offered a reservation on their bed at the facility under the following conditions. The policy shall be included in the admissions contract, and must additionally be furnished to the resident at the time of transfer or discharge. II. Resident #248 A. Resident #248, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dietary department followed safe practices to prevent the potential contamination of food and spread of food-borne illness through proper kitchen sanitation procedures. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Holding temperatures were at appropriate level; -Adequate hand washing occured; -Moisture was not between stacked pans; and, -Health shakes were appropriately dated. Findings include: I. Food temperatures of cold and hot food items were not held at the proper temperature to reduce the risk of food borne illness. A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/DEHS_RetailFd_6CCR10102_RFFC_EffJan2019.pdf. It read in pertinent part; The food shall have an initial temperature of 41ºF or less when removed from cold holding temperature control or 135°F or greater when removed from hot holding temperature control. B. Main kitchen The evening meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine and identify what resources are necessary to care for its residents appropriately during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a facility assessment which was specific to the residents of the facility. Findings include: The deficiency was cited previously during a recertification survey on 2/7/19. Although the facility corrected the deficiency, based on the findings below, the facility has not maintained compliance with the regulatory requirement. I. Record review The facility assessment was last reviewed on 1/10/2020 by the nursing home administrator (NHA). The facility assessment failed to include the following: -Include staff competencies that were necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population or include the staff training program to ensure any training needs were met for all new and existing staff; -Identify the certified medication technicians job duties…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-05 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff, medical director interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all responsibilities of the medical director were effectively performed, which had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. Specifically the facility failed to ensure: -The medical director fulfilled his responsibility for the implementation of resident care policies or the coordination of medical care in the facility; and, -Participated in the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee or assigned a designee to represent him/her. Findings include: I. Medical director agreement The medical director (MD) independent contract agreement was signed 2/2/11. The agreement documented the medical director shall participate in the development and annual review of written facility policies and procedures as they relate to resident medical and nursing. The MD will serve on the quality assurance committee, infection control committee, pharmacy committee. Review of incident and accident reports as may be requested by the facility nursing home administrator to identify health and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-05 · tag F0843 — widespread
    Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to have in effect a written transfer agreement with one or more hospitals approved for participation under Medicare and Medicaid programs in order to reasonably ensure residents would be transferred from the facility to a hospital, and assured of timely admission to the hospital when transfer was medically appropriate. Findings include: Record review The facility was unable to provide a written agreement for the one area hospital. The facility provided a transfer agreement between the area hospital and the facilities prior ownership. The agreement was between the former owner and the area hospital which was dated 8/1/95. Interview The nursing home administrator was interviewed on 2/5/2020 at 8:00 a.m. The NHA said she did not have a written transfer agreement. She provided the version from 1995 and previous owners, as mentioned above. Follow-up The NHA was interviewed a second time on 2/5/2020 at approximately 1:00 p.m. The NHA said she contacted the hospital and an hospital transfer agreement was signed. The agreement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-02-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to, abuse prevention and reporting, kitchen sanitation, staff competencies, meaningful activities, medication administration, facility assessment, unnecessary medications. Findings include: I. Cross-reference citations Cross-reference F600: The facility failed to ensure freedom from abuse. The facility's failure to identify and address quality concerns of abuse resulted in the facility having substandard care. The facility's failure to report all alleged violations of potential abuse was cited at a F level and resulted in substandard care. Cross-reference F609: The facility failed to report alleged violations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure for three (#25, #82, and #94) of six residents who receive Medicaid benefits were notified out of 52 total sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Residents/legal representatives were notified when personal funds account reached $200.00 less than resource limit allowed for one person. Findings include: I. Record review The Trial Balance, dated 2/3/2020, revealed three sample Residents (#25, #82 and #94) had a personal needs account (PNA) balance within $200 of the State allowable limit of $2000.00. The medical records for Resident #25, #82 and #94 failed to show any evidence that the family had been contacted and notified of the PNA account was within $200 of the State allowable limit of $2000.00 A. Resident #25 Resident #25 PNA quarterly statements dated 11/1/19 through 1/13/2020 showed an opening balance of $1708.26 and an ending balance of $1963.88. The Resident's account had been within $200 of the State allowable resource limit of $2000.00 for the last two months. The PNA ledger…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, the facility failed to inform two of three sample residents (#18 and #96) of changes in services covered by Medicare, in a timely and appropriate manner. Specifically, the facility failed to demonstrate that residents who previously received skilled nursing facility services (SNF), funded through Medicare benefits, had received timely and appropriate written notice of discontinuation of benefits and notice of liability. Findings include: I. Resident #18 A. Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage Resident #18 The Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMPNC) for resident #18 was not delivered in a timely manner. According to the facility, the last covered day (LCD) was 10/3/19. However, the NOMPNC showed the notice was not given timely and was given on 10/7/19 which was six days late. B. Liability Notices According to the documentation provided by the facility on 2/5/2020, the Medicare Part A benefits were terminated for resident #18 on 10/3/19 and the resident continued to reside in the facility after the termination of benefits. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure five (#1, #78, #26, #77 and #37) of 10 residents reviewed for activities of 20 sample residents had an ongoing activity program based on comprehensive assessments, care plans and resident preferences. Specifically, the facility failed to provide person centered, meaningful activities that met the interests and needs of Residents #1, #78, #26, #77 and #37. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities in Nursing Home policy, dated 6/9/16, was provided by the medical records director on 2/5/2020 at 11:15 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Because absence of meaningful and/or enjoyable activity can lead to mental and physical deterioration in residents, the Activities Department will work as a member of the interdisciplinary team to keep resident functioning at the highest level possible in all dimensions of life, physical, mental, social, emotional and spiritual, encourage independence and pre-institutional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five out of five nurses were able to demonstrate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct comprehensive competencies in skills for nurses. Findings include: I. Facility demographics Cross-reference F838 due to the facility assessment failed to include the complete and through competencies for licensed nurses. The January 2020 Census and Condition form was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 1/27/2020 at 11:00 a.m. It documented 44 residents were on respiratory treatments, two residents had indwelling or external catheters and one resident with colostomy. The Facility Assessment last updated January 2020, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/27/2020 at 11:00 a.m. It identified nursing staff competencies to provide care needed for the residents were: hand hygiene, meal feeding skills, medication pass and needle skills. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure six (#14, #19, #29, #36, #37 and #66) of six residents reviewed out of 52 sample residents received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility was aware that Resident #36 with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance and had physical resident-to-resident altercations with four residents (#29, #36, #66 and #37) when she resided on the secured unit. The facility failed to comprehensively assess and effectively identify person-centered approaches for dementia care for Resident #36 by addressing repeated behavioral issues created an environment where the 16 other residents residing on the secured unit were at risk for harm. The facilities failures to implement appropriate interventions timely for Resident #36 who had documented history of resident-to-resident altercations towards multiple residents contributed to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater for two (#8 and #96) out of nine residents observed during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to: - Ensure the correct strength of Refresh eye drop was administered to Resident #96, - Ensure prescribed medications were administered at the scheduled time for Residents #8 and #96, - Ensure Resident #8's mouth was rinsed after the administration of his inhaler, - Prevent an error rate of 36.67%, resulting from eleven medication errors out of 30 opportunities. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Medication Administration policy dated February 2011, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 2/4/2020 at 11:00 a.m. It read in pertinent part, If there is any discrepancy between the medication administration record (MAR) and the label, check physician orders before administering the medication. If mediation is given at a time different from the scheduled time, give reason for change in time in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to provide assistance with hand hygiene to the residents before meals. Findings include Observations On 1/27/2020, 1/28/2020 and 1/29/2020, prior to the lunch and supper meals, as staff assisted residents into the downstairs dining room, the staff failed to offer and provide hand hygiene assistance before residents ate their meals. On 1/30/2020, prior to the lunch and supper meals, as staff assisted residents into the main dining room, the staff failed to offer and provide hand hygiene assistance before residents ate their meals. Staff interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 2/5/2020 at 6:06 p.m. She said she was the facility's infection control preventionist. She said all staff were trained on proper hand washing techniques.The process for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and resident record review, the facility failed to designate a resident representative to advocate for the resident and ensure advance directives matched the resident's current needs and wishes for one (#83) of three residents reviewed out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the resident was not provided an opportunity to have interested parties attend care plan conferences, and be involved in advanced directives as the resident's health and ability to participate had declined. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Surrogate Decision Making policy, undated, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE], revealed in pertinent part: An appropriate surrogate is designated to make decisions on behalf of a resident who is incapable of making decisions for self. -Surrogate decision making because of resident mental incompetence to make personal health care decisions must be supported by court approval or by the observed fact that resident is unresponsible (sic)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#94) of one out of a total of 52 sampled residents who entered the facility with limited mobility and range of motion received appropriate services and assistance to maintain or improve mobility with the maximum practicable independence unless a reduction in mobility was demonstrated as unavoidable, out of 52 sample residents. Resident #94, who required supervision with ambulation in his room and on the corridor had a decline in his mobility which showed he no longer ambulated in the corridor and required limited assistance in his room. He had an avoidable decline in his walking ability after staff failed to assess for interventions. The staff failed to update the care plan with interventions and to initiate recommendations for walking with the resident. As a result of the facility's failures Resident #94 went from walking with supervision in the corridor to limited assistance and now to the activity not occuring. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for two of one residents (#61) out three out of 52 total sampled residents. Specifically the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #61 received appropriate assessments, interventions, and post-fall reviews to ensure further falls were prevented. (Cross-reference to F695). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Accident/Incident Report policy, undated, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/4/2020, revealed in pertinent part: An accident is defined as any happening, not consistent with the routine operation of the long-term care facility. -All residents who fall or are found on the floor must have their vital signs taken as soon as possible. -Update resident care plan. II. Resident #61 Resident #61 was admitted to the facility 3/9/11, and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2020 medication administration record (MAR), diagnoses include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate respiratory services were provided for one (#61) of five residents reviewed out of 52 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and respiratory care was provided per professional standards for Resident #61. Cross-reference to F689, accident hazards Findings include: I. Resident #61 status Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. According to the February 2020 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, history of falling, chronic kidney disease stage 3, folate deficiency anemia, and low back pain. The 12/30/19 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15. The resident had behaviors, present and fluctuating, of inattention and disorganized thinking. The resident was on oxygen.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two (#16 and #248) of six residents reviewed for the use of unnecessary medications out of 52 total residents were free from unnecessary drugs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure gradual dose reduction was attempted for Resident #16; and -Provide non pharmacological interventions for Resident #248 before administering antipsychotic medications. Findings include: I. Resident #16 A. Resident status Resident #16, under [AGE] years old, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2020 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included mild intellectual disabilities, type 2 diabetes, hemiplegia from cerebral vascular disease. The 11/15/19 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had not cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15. The resident exhibited no behaviors, and showed no symptoms of depression. The resident was coded as received an antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents ' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Cross reference F838-failed to have a completed comprehensive facility assessment Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide a completed facility assessment and with the lack of skill competencies the facility could not make sure the cares provided were up to professional standards; and, -Document and ensure the above CNAs and CNA-MED had completed competencies in skills and techniques. Findings include: Record review No competencies for staff were found in the files for the CNAs. Interviews CNA #8 was interviewed on 2/7/19 at 9:20 a.m. He said he had not had to demonstrate his skills in order to prove his competency in providing care before providing care. CNA #7 was interviewed on 2/7/19 at 9:42 a.m. She said she had not had to demonstrate her skills in order to prove her competency in providing care before providing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one of one kitchens. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Appropriate hand hygiene by food service staff. Findings include: I. Improper hand hygiene A. Professional references A. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Hand Hygiene in Healthcare Settings, March 2016, https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/providers/index.html (January 2018). It read in pertinent part, .When to Perform Hand Hygiene .After contact with inanimate object (including medical equipment) in the immediate vicinity of the patient . B. According to Aurora Health Care, Neutropenic Precautions, May 2016, https://ahc.aurorahealthcare.org/fywb/X31975.pdf (January 2018). It read in pertinent part, . Placing you on neutropenic precautions means that we are taking extra steps to protect you from germs, because you have a lowered ability to fight infections .Read and follow the instructions on the door. Family/visitors may be asked to wear a mask or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Specifically, the facility failed to have a comprehensive facility assessment. I. Findings include The facility assessment (FA) was reviewed and revealed it was not a comprehensive assessment of the facilities resources necessary to provide daily care to the resident population. The FA was developed on 12/29/17 and updated 1/2/19. The facility had a secured unit with 23 residents. The FA did not identify a secured unit. The facility failed to identify the care required by the resident population specifically the secured unit. The FA did not complete the ethnic, cultural, and religious factors to include languages, cultural preferences, and religions within the resident population. The FA did not include a staffing plan to include sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any time. The FA did not identify staff training and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel competent to carry out the functions of the dietary service for one of two dining rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an adequate system was in place to provide meal services in a timely fashion to residents seated in the secured dining room. Findings include: The food was prepared in the main kitchen and transported to the secure unit at all meal times. The meal carts were brought into the secure unit at 11:50 a.m. A. Posted mealtimes The posted meal times for the main dining room were breakfast was scheduled to begin breakfast at 6:30 a.m., lunch at 10:30 a.m. and dinner at 3:30 p.m. B. Lunch observations On 2/4/19 at 11:03 a.m., 14 residents were observed sitting in various locations in the Cokedale dining room. Residents were helped to their respective tables. -At 11:36 a.m., 19 residents were seated in the dining room. -At 11:42 a.m.-11:45 a.m., two certified nurse aide (CNA)'s started taking residents orders and serving drinks to the residents. -At 11:45 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one (#42) of 34 residents had a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to allow Resident #42 a visit with a lawyer for a change of power of attorney (POA). I. Professional reference Shari D Caton, Esq. Colorado Bar association, Power of Attorney, http://www.cobar.org/portals/cobar/repository/SLH/chap23.pdf (2/12/19), .Does a power of attorney take away a principal's rights? A power of attorney does not take away a principal ' s right to make decisions. An agent simply has the power to act along with the principal in accordance with the authorization set forth in the document. Only a court, through a guardianship and/or conservatorship proceeding, can take away a principal ' s rights . Can a principal change his or her mind? A principal may change his or her mind and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services and assistance during meals for one (#77) of four residents reviewed for meal assistance of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely assistance during a meal for Resident #77. Findings include: A. Resident status Resident #77, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2019 computerized physician order (CPO), diagnoses included orofacial dystonia and anorexia. The 10/1/18 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed, the resident had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15. No mood or behavior symptoms were noted. No rejection of cares noted. He required total assist with eating. B. Record review The care plan, revised on 10/11/18, identified a nutritional risk with a diagnosis of anorexia. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for three (#84, #3 and 58) of eight residents reviewed for activities out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #84, #3 and #58 were invited and encouraged to attend activities of their preference. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the University of Rochester Medical Center, Older Adults and the Importance of Social Interaction, 2015, https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/encyclopedia/content.aspx (March 2017), in pertinent part: .Specific health benefits of social interaction in older adults include: Potentially reduced risk for cardiovascular problems, some cancers, osteoporosis, and rheumatoid arthritis. Potentially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and family interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, their comprehensive, person centered care plan and the residents choice for one (#55) of five residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use out of 34 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify Resident #55s physician of low oxygen saturation levels (SATs); and did not educate or remind the resident when he was found without his oxygen on. Findings include: 1. Resdient status Resident #55, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2019 computerized physician order (CPO), diagnoses included congestive schizoaffective disorder, personality disorder, dementia with behaviors and dependence on supplemental oxygen. The 12/19/18 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed, the resident had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTENNIAL HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CENTENNIAL III COLORADO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2022
CENTENNIAL I TBD HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2022
CENTENNIAL MN TR IOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 09/01/2022
CENTENNIAL M TRUST IIOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2025
CENTENNIAL MS TRUST IOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
CENTENNIAL YF TRUST IOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
EMSSAH NON- GRANTOR TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
GOTTLIEB, REFOELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
BANK HAPOALIM B.M.Organization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/30/2025
GOTTS CONSULTING COLORADO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2022
JENNINGS, STACIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
MCFARLAND, DOUGLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
FRIEDMAN, TAMARIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
NEUMAN, EMANUELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022
SINGER, SIMONIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 4%Other / private 11%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$282per resident / day
operating cost
$8,569per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$284per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Colorado
$10,159/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,182/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,584/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065396. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next