Peaks Care Center, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 33.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 83.9 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (#4) of six residents reviewed for accident hazards out of six sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the appropriate transfer techniques when transferring residents, which resulted in Resident #4 sustaining rib fractures following a fall that occurred during an improper transfer with CNA #1.Resident #4, who had a history of falling, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The resident had the ability to transfer to and from a bed to a chair (or wheelchair) with substantial/maximal assistance from staff (staff performed more than half of the effort by lifting or holding the resident's trunk or limbs and providing more than half the effort).On 7/11/25 Resident #4 was being assisted by certified nurse aide (CNA) #1 to transfer from her bed to her wheelchair. According to the facility's incident report,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure dietary staff washed their hands and changed single-use glove use appropriately during meal service;-Ensure meat was thawed according to safe food handling practices;-Ensure staff wore hair nets during food preparation; -Ensure the microwave was maintained in good repair and safe condition; and,-Ensure staff maintained sanitary conditions in the kitchen when eating at a food preparation table. Findings include:I. Hand hygieneA. Professional referenceThe Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, revised 3/16/24, were retrieved on 4/16/26. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation, including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles and: after touching bare human body parts other than clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#5, #9, #47 and #61) of four residents out of 39 sample residents were provided services that met professional standards of quality. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff obtained a physician's order specifying personalized settings for air mattresses for Resident #5, Resident #9, Resident #47 and Resident #61; and, -Ensure staff maintained air mattresses according to the manufacturer's recommendations for Resident #5, Resident #9, Resident #47 and Resident #61.Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers and Injuries(3/17/26), retrieved on 4/16/26 from https://www.guidelinecentral.com/guideline/23835, It is good practice for organizations to maintain an inventory of, or access to, a range of full body support surfaces appropriate to the clinical context. The inventory should be maintained, stored and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for three (#57, #52 and #5) of five residents reviewed for oxygen services out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure there was a physician's order in place for Resident #57's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine and routine maintenance of the CPAP; and,-Ensure there were appropriate oxygen orders in place for Resident #52 and Resident #5.Findings include: I. Professional reference According to Nursing Skills, Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, [NAME] E, editors. Eau [NAME] (WI): [NAME] Valley Technical College; published 2021, accessed on 4/14/26 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593208/, Oxygen is considered a medication and, therefore, requires a prescription and continuous monitoring by the nurse to ensure its safe and effective use. (Chapter 11) Devices such as high flow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide proper storage for medications for four of five medication carts and one of three medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure eye drops, inhalers and Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) vials were labeled with the date they were opened;-Ensure glucometer test strips and glucose control solutions were labeled with the date they were opened; and,-Ensure glucometer test strips and glucose control solutions were discarded when expired.Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the manufacturer Catalent Pharma Solutions Xalatan(R) latanoprost ophthalmic solution package insert, , revised [DATE], and retrieved on [DATE] from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/020597s044lbl.pdf,Once a bottle is opened for use, it may be stored at room temperature up to 25 degrees Celsius (77 degrees Fahrenheit - F) for six weeks.According to the manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline Highlights of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of diseases on three of four units and in one of two dining rooms.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to -Resident #59, who was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP);-Ensure staff offered residents hand hygiene before meals; and,-Ensure oxygen cannulas and CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure - a machine used to treat breathing issues while sleeping) masks were stored in a sanitary manner.Findings include: I. Failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate PPE while providing care to Resident #59, who was on EBP A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to document resuscitation choices accurately in the medical record for one (#16) of one resident out of 39 sample residents. Specially, the facility failed to ensure Resident #16's medical orders for scope of treatment (MOST) form matched the physician's order for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).Findings include:I. Resident #16A. Resident statusResident #16, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur and asthma.The [DATE] minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of nine out of 15. She required set-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene and partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and dressing. B. Record reviewResident #16's MOST form, which was located in a binder at the nurses' station and uploaded into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate positioning and contracture management for residents to maintain their highest practicable level of functioning for two (#59 and #15) of three residents out of 39 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff were appropriately monitoring the use of a resistance band that was requested by Resident #59 to keep her left leg safely positioned on her wheelchair leg rest; and,-Ensure hand splints were provided in a timely manner for Resident #15, who had Swan neck deformities (a condition causing the middle knuckles of the hand to bend inward and the end knuckles to bend outward, creating an S-shape) in both hands.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Mobility and Range of Motion policy, revised July 2017, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/9/26 at 4:42 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the hospice services provided met professional standards and principles that applied to individual providing services for one (#47) of two residents reviewed for hospice care services out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Establish a communication process, including how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider for Resident #47; and, -Ensure hospice agency staff notes were easily accessible to the facility staff and included consistent documentation of hospice care visits for Resident #47.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Hospice Service Facility Agreement policy and procedure was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/9/26 at 4:42 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The written agreement(s) will set out at least the following: a communication process, including how the communication will be documented between the facility and the hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls, and failed to assess, implement and monitor interventions consistent with resident needs for two (#3 and #9) of three residents reviewed for falls out of seven sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN), nurse practitioner or physician assess the residents after unwitnessed falls, prior to the removal of the residents from off the floor. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Falls and Fall Risk Managing policy, revised January 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/20/24 at 8:31 a.m. The policy revealed on previous evaluations and current data, the staff would identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks/causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. According to the minimum data set, (MDS) a fall was defined as an unintentionally coming to rest on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure quality of care and address needed communication for one (#45) of six residents reviewed out of 26 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #45's cardiac specialist was notified when the facility chose not to implement the specialist's recommended physician's orders; and, -Inform Resident #45 about medications ordered by a specialist that were not implemented by the facility. Findings include: I. Resident #45 status Resident #45, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the February 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included heart disease, cirrhosis of the liver, right leg amputation above the knee and peripheral vascular disease (reduced blood flow to limbs). The 12/23/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. He required substantial assistance with hygiene, mobility and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRONTLINE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 77 rows in the source record cover these 52 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $497K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO