No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Trinity Manor

510 W Frontview Street, Dodge City, KS 67801 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 46 certified beds · (620) 227-8551 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (620) 227-8551 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jul 2021Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$29,773 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jul 2021
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $29,773 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-15)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2603 Central Ave · (620) 227-7771 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2401 Central Ave · (620) 227-8193 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2120 N 14th Ave · (620) 471-4012 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 W Ross Blvd · (620) 255-0099 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.8%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened33.1%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.3%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.3%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.5%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%73.8%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.9%22.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.9%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.401.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.542.131.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.6%CMS range 48.9–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 7.5–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.4–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.04
RN hours/ resident / day
0.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.94
RN hoursweekends
40.5%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 36.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.04 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.94 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-23)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-09)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 41 residents with one resident sampled for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and ensure a safe and secure environment as free from accident hazards as possible when Housekeeping/Laundry Staff C failed to report a malfunctioning basement door. About six weeks later, on 07/01/24, cognitively impaired Resident (R)1 opened the same malfunctioning, key coded basement door and fell down seven steps to the landing, in her wheelchair. R1 sustained major injuries including a lump to the back of her head and three fractured ribs. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy and at risk for personal injury. (R1) Findings included: - R1's electronic medical record (EMR) included the following diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) and cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 41 residents with three residents sampled for safety related to transportation outside the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe environment as free of accident hazards as possible, when Social Services Designee (SSD) C failed to ensure the lap belt was snug on Resident (R)1 prior to transport in the facility van while traveling on the highway. R1 fell out of the wheelchair onto the floor of the facility van, landing on his knees. SSD C failed to notify 911 or activate EMS for assistance. SSD C assisted R1 to lay on the floor of the van and then drove R1 back to the facility (approximately 20 miles), unsecured, and laying on the floor of the wheelchair van. Upon arrival to the facility R1 required emergency medical transport to a local hospital for evaluation and treatment of a left femur (thigh bone) fracture (broken bone). This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R1 had diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner for the 40 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - On 01/21/25 at 07:48 AM, observation in the facility kitchen revealed: A refrigerator with an opened, partially used, undated plastic quart container of macaroni salad, undated, opened, and partially used bags of diced ham, and pre-cooked chicken pieces. The walk-in freezer had three boxes of food stored on the floor. On 01/22/25 at 10:45 AM, observation in the facility kitchen revealed the utensil drawers below the coffee maker had a piece of wrinkled paper towel, a brownish drip in a teaspoon, and a small amount of dried food particles. The drawers under a make table had plastic bins for scoops and ladles with dried food and spills in the bins. The walk-in freezer stall had two boxes of food on the floor. The kitchen had one of six fluorescent light covers with a large number of cracks. On 01/21/25 at 07:48 AM, Dietary Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as air-conditioning units in large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by legionella) which placed the residents at risk of contracting infectious processes. Findings included: - On 01/22/25 at 04:50 PM, Administrative Staff A reported the facility lacked a waterborne pathogen/Legionella program. The facility's Legionella Water Management Program dated 08/2023, documented as part of the infection prevention and control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team. The purpose of the water management program is used to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of Legionella disease. The facility failed to implement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure two of five residents reviewed during the medication administration pass remained free of medication errors for Resident (R) 19 and R21. This placed the residents at risk for adverse reactions from the medication. Findings included: - R19's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS- abnormally increased motility of the small and large intestines), and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R19's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 00 that indicated she had severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded she required extensive assistance of two staff with activities of daily living (ADLs). R19's Care Plan, dated 12/31/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary food storage to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On 02/07/03 at 07:52 AM initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Staff CC revealed the following concerns: In the main refrigerator: 1. A large bag of shredded cheese, open and undated. 2. A container of sliced tomatoes, lacked preparation or expiration date. 3. A large bag of shredded lettuce, open and undated. 4. A small bag of shredded lettuce, open and undated. On 02/08/23 at 12:15 PM, Dietary Staff BB, stated staff should label food products in the refrigerators and freezers with an opened (or prepared) date and expiration dates. The revised 06/1997 facility's policy for Storage of food and non-food items revealed all opened food items would be labeled with contents and dated. Further documented that cheese should be tightly wrapped. The facility failed to store food under sanitary conditions for the residents in the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility census totaled 43 residents with 12 residents included in the sample and two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to send a copy of the facility- initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge notice to the Office of the State Long- Term Care Ombudsman for Residents (R)40 and R 34. Findings included: - R 40's signed physician orders dated 12/25/22, revealed the following diagnoses: alcohol dependence, in remission (consumption of alcohol in large quantities on a routine basis), atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heartbeat), history of falling, unsteadiness on feet, and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of staff with transfers and ambulation. The resident had falls prior to admission with no fracture, and no falls since admission. The Significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 43 residents, with 12 sampled, including five residents for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for one of the five residents reviewed, regarding Zoloft (antidepressant- class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression) and a lab for diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) for Resident (R) 21, by not decreasing the dose of this medication as ordered and not having the lab results available for review. These failures placed the resident at risk for adverse effects related to medication use. Findings Included: - The 02/07/23 Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented diagnoses of depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness) and diabetes mellitus. The 12/23/22 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severely impaired cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-07-15 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). Findings Include: - On 07/13/21 at 11:50 AM Dietary Staff (DS) J confirmed she was not a CDM. She stated that her plan was to attend courses as soon as she could get registered, explaining that since Covid-19 it was difficult to register for classes. On 07/14/21 at 01:39 PM Administrative staff A stated DS J the had taken the courses but had not tested, also that the registered dietician had found out recently that DS J could still test, even though courses were taken in the mid 1990's. Stated she was aware they were to have a CDM and confirmed that they do not currently. The facility failed to provide a policy on required dietary staff when requested on 07/15/21. The facility failed to employ a CDM in the allotted time.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents, with one central kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store foods safely and sanitary by the staff's failure to date and reseal opened food items, failure to discard expired food items, and failure to use gloves appropriately in the kitchen. Findings included: - On 07/12/21 at 08:24 AM, during the initial tour of the main kitchen, the following was observed: In the walk-in refrigerator, noted one crate with 17 molded tomatoes, one bag of broccoli florets, one bag of carrots, and one bag of vegetable medley all opened and not dated, one eight ounce (oz) boost breeze (liquid nourishment) with a use-by date of 06/21/21, three eight oz boost breeze with a use-by date of 06/30/21, one eight oz ensure plus (liquid nourishment) with a use-by date of 09/01/20. In the refrigerator, noted one 24 oz container of cottage cheese expired on 07/07/21, one bag of sliced ham, and one bag of 22 hot dogs opened and not dated. During an interview on 07/12/21 at 09:03 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) J removed all items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 32 residents, with three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)183 in advance of Medicare Part A (skilled) services ending on 05/06/21 per the Centers for Medicaid/Medicare Services (CMS) regulation. Findings included: - Review of R183's Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNAC) documented her Medicare Part A skilled services last covered day was 05/06/21, and the resident had signed the form. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage, (SNFABN) documented the form was not provided to R183 because the Social Services Director (SSD) was new and still learning the forms that were required. An interview with SSD D on 07/12/21 at 04:30 PM revealed she provided all residents with the NOMNAC at the end of skilled services but only provided the SNFABN to residents who remained in the facility after skilled services. She did not provide the SNFABN to residents who discharged from the facility after completing skilled services. SSD D stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 32 residents with 12 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident's property, when the facility utilized Resident (R)133's government issued stimulus check to pay for facility charges on the resident's account without R133's consent. Findings included: - Review of the R133 personal funds revealed a deposit of $1200.00 from a government issued stimulus check. Further review revealed the facility used R133's stimulus check to make a payment to the facility, towards his account. Review of R133's record revealed no evidence of resident consent for the transaction. Interview with Business office staff C on 7/14/21 at 03:01 PM revealed R133 would not sign the check they had sent to him at the other facility where lived prior to admission to the current facility. The funds were placed back into R133's account and Business office staff C wrote a check from the account to the facility to apply the amount of the stimulus check to the account. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the consultant pharmacist's recommendations for Resident (R)2. Findings included: - Review of R2's Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 07/26/21 included a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). A review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 received scheduled pain medication, as well as seven out of the seven-day observation period of antipsychotics (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental and emotional conditions) and antidepressants (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression). Review of the Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/04/20, documented that the resident had a potential for issues related to psychotropic medications and that pharmacy reviews were to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents, with 12 sampled and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to adequately follow the physicians' diabetic orders and document appropriately for Resident (R)2. Findings included: - Review of R2's Physician's Orders Electronic Medical Record dated 07/26/21 included a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus (DM; when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). A review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. R2 received insulin (mediation that regulates the amount of glucose in the blood) seven out of a seven-day observation period. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 08/04/20 documented no applicable CAAs triggered. A review of the Quarterly MDS dated 04/07/21, documented a BIMS score of 13, indicating intact cognition. R2 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 32 residents, with 12 sampled, including five for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately ensure gradual dose reductions (GDR's) were attempted for Resident (R) 2. Findings included: - Review of R2's Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 07/26/21 included a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). A review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 received scheduled pain medication, as well as seven out of the seven-day observation period of antipsychotics (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental and emotional conditions) and antidepressants (class of medications used to treat mood disorders and relieve symptoms of depression). Review of the Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 08/04/20, documented that the resident had a potential for issues related to psychotropic medications and that pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$29,773 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $17,124 — penalty dated 2024-07-15
  • $12,649 — penalty dated 2024-02-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRONTLINE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TRINITY MANOR PROPCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/2012
TRINITY MANOR ASSOCIATES LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2012
ORDELHEIDE, COLLEENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/31/2021
VELUSCEK, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2012
WHEELER, TERRYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/31/2021
FRONTIER MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2025
ABLE, SARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2022
BAKER, ADAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2020
EISEL, RHONDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
ELLIOT, STACIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
JONES, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2012
KENDIG, DEBBIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2021
KERNS, CETRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/28/2008
LAMPE, TAMMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2021
MAZZA, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2013
NEWTON, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/26/2017
ONG, EDISONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
ORBACK, HEATHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/20/2011
SALAS, CHERISEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/02/2014
SARACINO, KELLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/07/2013
SCHAULIEGE, TANNERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/05/2019
SCOTT, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
TROTTER, ROGERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2003
KIKLIS, DEANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
ALLSTAFF CHARTEREDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
FINANICAL MANAGEMENT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
FRONTLINE MDS EXCHANGE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
INTEGRA ACCOUNTING SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
KEY REHABILITATION INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
LIPPOLD & HOLLAND LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/25/2020
MAJOR STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2025
OPENWORK HEALTH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2022
PINNACLE PHARMACY GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
IRWIN, JANETIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
LEKAWA, ELLIOTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 35 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$487K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 14%Other / private 17%

This home reported $487K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$282per resident / day
operating cost
$8,571per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175377. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next