Wheatridge Park Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

27.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 40.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 41 residents and identified 11 cognitive impaired females. The sample included three residents reviewed for abuse. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment when staff did not provide adequate supervision to prevent resident-to-resident sexual abuse. On 12/10/23 staff found cognitively intact, independent Resident (R )1 kissing R2, a resident with severe cognitive impairment who lacked the ability to consent. Staff reported R1 had his hand inside of R2's shirt, and R2 had her hand inside of R1's pants. The staff separated the residents. This deficient practiced placed R2 in immediate jeopardy. Finding included: - Resident (R)1's Physician Orders dated 10/01/22 revealed a diagnosis of unspecified dementia unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents, with 12 residents sampled, and one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a pressure reducing device on the bed to prevent a pressure injury for Resident (R) 2. On 07/11/24 the facility noted R2's previous pressure injuries were all closed. On 07/12/24, R2 was moved to a different room and the facility failed to move his air mattress for his bed to the new room. On 07/24/24, R2's left heal pressure injury re-opened and was identified as a stage three pressure injury (full thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below). This placed the resident at risk to worsen his pressure ulcers and delayed healing. Findings included: - Resident (R) 2 's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents, which included 12 residents sampled and three reviewed for accidents and accident hazards. Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for the residents of the facility when the facility failed to properly store chemicals in an unlocked cabinet in an unlocked room and when the facility stored chemicals along a rail in the hallway. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure R26, who was identified by the facility as confused and independently mobile with aggressive and wandering behaviors, remained free of accident hazards when R26 put scissors in his pocket and wandered inside the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure that two residents, Resident (R) 22 and R8, remained free of accident hazards related to falls when the facility failed to appropriately investigate, develop, and implement appropriate interventions to prevent multiple falls for R22 related to continued…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual performance review at least once every 12 months for five Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) reviewed, to ensure adequate appropriate cares and services provided to the residents of the facility. The facility identified five CNAs employed over 12 the month period. Findings included: - Review of employee files on 09/12/24 at 2:00 PM revealed a lack of performance evaluations signed by management for five of five Certified Nurse's Aides (CNAs), that had been employed over one year, that included Certified Nurse's Aide CNA P, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA S and CNA T. On 09/12/24 at 2:00 PM, Administrative Staff A reported that producing the requested performance evaluations for CNA staff would be difficult and stated that he did not know that annual performance evaluations for CNA staff was a requirement. The facility's In-Service Training, Nurse Aide policy dated 09/2022, documented that the facility completes a performance review of the nurse aides at least every 12 months.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility census totaled 40 residents on three halls with a commons area where residents gathered for meals and activities. The facility had one medication cart and one nurse treatment cart that services the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by the failure to ensure a nurse treatment cart that contained insulin (a medication used to treat diabetes [a disease when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin]), topical ointments and creams, and narcotics that were in a locked box within the nurse's treatment cart, remained locked when not in direct line of vision of the nurse, in an area where residents could access it. Findings included: - Observation on 09/11/24 at 07:47 AM, revealed a treatment cart unlocked and unattended in the hallway where residents could access it. Observation on 09/11/24 at 02:20 PM, revealed a treatment cart in the residents' hallway, unlocked and unattended. On 09/11/24 at 07:50 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G identified the unlocked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary conditions for food storage and dishes to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Initial tour of the kitchen on 09/10/24 at 08:32 AM with Dietary Manager L, revealed the following areas of concerns: 1. In the serving area, several stacks of bowls and plates stored in the upright position that had the potential to be exposed to splash, dust or other contamination. 2. In the dry storage area, a box of pancake mix opened to air and undated, a large bag of long grain rice opened to air and undated, a large container of Japanese breadcrumbs opened to air and undated, and a box of white cake mix opened to air and undated. 3. In an upright stand-alone refrigerator was a container of white cheese opened to air. 4. The facility utilized a three basin sink system for low-temp washing of dishes. Dietary Manager L was unable to provide current sanitation documentation and produced a package of testing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuse properly in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests. Findings included: - Initial tour of the outside trash dumpsters on 09/10/24 at 08:32 AM with Dietary Manager L, revealed two dumpsters had the lids in the open position, one of which had trash debris that stuck out of the dumpster. Both lids were broken and failed to completely cover the trash cans. On 09/10/24 at 08:40 AM, Dietary Manager L revealed he was not aware of the requirement to have trash covered. On 09/10/24 at 10:29 AM, Administrative Staff A stated that the dumpsters belonged to the city. The facility lacked a policy related to garbage and refuse handling and disposal. The facility failed to provide sanitary garbage and refuse containers that were maintained with lids closed or otherwise covered. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to harborage and feeding of pest animals.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 40 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to put in place an effective administration who ensured the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident who resided at the facility. The outcome of these failures caused harm to Resident (R)2 and R8. Findings included: - The facility failed to provide Resident (R)10 care in a dignified manner during colostomy care. R10 was left lying in his bed for 40 minutes with his door open, undressed waist up and no colostomy (surgical creation of an artificial opening on the stomach wall to excrete feces from the body) bag covered his stoma. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to include R7 to his care plan meetings. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care and services. This practice had the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's double-door oven was in safe operating condition. Findings included: - On 09/12/24 at 11:01 AM, observation revealed a double-door oven was held closed with a folding metal chair. Interview on 09/12/24 at 11:01 AM with Dietary Manager L, confirmed that the oven doors would not stay closed and must be propped closed with a metal folding chair. The facility failed to provide a policy related to maintaining properly functioning equipment. The facility failed to maintain mechanical equipment in safe operating condition.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and permanently maintain an in-service training program for Certified Nurse Aide (CNAs) with the required topics and no less than 12 hours per year. Two of the five nurse aides sampled lacked the required training topics. Two of five nurse aides sampled lacked the required 12 hours per year of in-service training. Findings included: - On 09/12/24 at 12:30 PM, review of training records for five CNAs employed by the facility for more than one year revealed two CNAs had less than 12 hours of documented in-service training for the previous 12 months. CNA S had eight hours of documented training and CNA T had 10.5 of documented training. On 09/12/24 at 12:30 PM, review of training records for five CNAs employed by the facility for more than one year revealed two CNAs did not have the required topics for in-service training for the previous 12 months. CNA Q lacked dementia care training and CNA R lacked behavior health training. On 09/12/24 at 11:49 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including review for advanced directives (a written document which indicated the medical decisions for health care professionals when the person could not make their own decisions). Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents had accurately completed advanced directives. Resident (R)2 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR- or no code, a legal document or order that means the person does not desire cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR is an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating] in the event of cardiac arrest), only signed by a physician. R8 had two DNR's; one signed by the guardian only and the other one signed only by the physician. R10's DNR was not signed by a witness and R 20's DNR was only signed by a physician. Findings included: - Resident (R)2 's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type two (DM2-when the body cannot use glucose, not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents which included 12 residents sampled, that included five residents reviewed for notification of discharge to residents' representative and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The facility failed to provide written notification to the representatives of Resident (R) 8, R26, R2, R10 and R21. Additionally, the facility also failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO-a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities). These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for impaired rights and uninformed care choices and had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs related to continuity of care across the healthcare spectrum. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R) 8 revealed a hospitalization from 05/01/24 to 05/06/24. Review of the EHR Progress Notes lacked documentation that R8's representative was notified of the hospitalization by the facility. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to Residents, (R)2, R10, R21 and R26 and/or their representative with a written notice specifying the duration of the bed-hold policy, at the time of the residents' transfers to the hospital. Findings included: - Resident (R) 2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type two (DM2-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and reduced mobility. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident had a total mood severity score of two, indicating no depression and R2 had no behaviors. R2 required total assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), which included bed mobility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$158,640 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $27,573 — penalty dated 2024-09-16
• $131,067 — penalty dated 2024-01-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FRONTLINE MANAGEMENT — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 33 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $623K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS