Cadia Rehabilitation Capitol

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R5) out of nine residents reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that R5 received the correct dose of morphine sulfate for pain when R5 erroneously received 15 mL (milliliter) of the concentrated morphine sulfate oral solution instead of the physician prescribed dose of 0.25 mL on 12/7/25 at 10:58 AM. With this significant medication error, R5 was at risk of a severe, life-threatening respiratory depression or death. R5 was administered Naloxone 0.4 mg/mL intramuscularly two times to reverse R5's overdosage on 12/7/25 at 4:13 PM and 8:02 PM. An immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified starting 12/7/25. Due to the facility's corrective measures following the last incident, this is being cited as immediate jeopardy, past non - compliance with an abatement date of 12/11/25. Findings include: A facility policy titled Medication Administration, dated 1/13/26, documented, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all medications are administered safely, accurately, timely, and in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for accidents the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an accident. R1, a totally dependent resident was rolled out of bed when a staff person lost grip on R1 during care. R1 rolled from the bed and fell three (3) feet to the floor sustaining a laceration to the head and was emergently transported to the hospital, this resulted in harm to R1. 6/6/17 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified dementia (a brain disorder with memory loss), sarcoidosis (an inflammatory disease) and aphasia (neurological condition affecting language). 5/20/24 - An annual MDS documented R1 as totally dependent for self-care, bed mobility and was severely impaired cognition. 6/3/24 - R1's care plan included that the resident was at risk of falls and interventions included: anticipate and meet the resident's needs. 6/1/24 - 6/12/24 - A review of CNA documentation revealed R1 was totally dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R30 and R108) out of nine residents sampled for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency within two hours. Findings include:2. Review of R108's clinical record revealed: 10/26/25 - E7 (CNA) documented in a written statement, On October 25, 2025 .around 11:15 PM I went to check on all my patients. When I got to [R108] she stated that 'the CNA that had her torn her clothes and was rough with her . 10/26/25 11:08 AM - The facility submitted an allegation of staff to resident abuse incident involving R108 to the state agency, greater than two hours after R108's initial report to the facility. 1/23/26 10:19 AM - During an interview E7 (CNA) confirmed the aforementioned written statement and that R108's allegation of abuse was reported to a nurse on 10/25/25. 1/23/26 1:57 PM - During an interview E3 (ADON) confirmed the finding. E3 stated, I found out through reading notes and things that it happened on the 25th but no one made leadership aware. 1/27/26 5:45 PM - Findings were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R5) out of three residents reviewed for PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), the facility failed to refer R5 for a PASRR evaluation as required when a resident experiences a significant change in mental health status. Findings include: Review of R5's clinical record revealed:2/6/23 - R5 was re-admitted to the facility. 11/13/23 - R5's Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome indicated that R5 had the following mental health diagnoses: -Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood-Delusional Disorder-Dementia-Mood Disorder NOS (not otherwise specified) -Anxiety Disorder NOS-Psychotic Disorder NOS-Insomnia-Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, severe, with psychotic symptoms2/14/25 - R5's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment revealed R5's new psychiatric/mood disorder diagnoses including bipolar disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and unspecified mood affective disorder. 3/25/25 - R5's significant change MDS assessment revealed R5's psychiatric/mood disorder diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined for one (R6) out three residents sampled for respiratory care the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice by ensuring R6's BiPap equipment was stored in a protective plastic bag when not in use. Findings include:A review of R6's clinical record revealed:1/10/24 - R6 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure and interstitial pulmonary disease.12/28/25 - A quarterly MDS documented that R6 was cognitively intact.1/20/26 - A physician's order documented BIPAP application at bedtime (HS) and PRN. The order specified: BIPAP setting: 10 cm H O with O bleed-in at 2 liters.1/26/26 - A review of the treatment administration record lacked evidence of an order directing that the BIPAP mask and tubing be stored in a protective plastic bag when not in use.1/20/26 at 10:11 AM - R6's BIPAP mask was observed lying on the bedside table, with the tubing on the floor.1/21/26 at 8:40 AM - R6's BIPAP mask was again observed lying on the bedside table, with the tubing on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R81) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review the facility failed to implement the MRR policies when recommendations made by the pharmacist and agreed by the provider were not completed by the facility. Findings include: The facilities Pharmacist monthly drug review policy last updated 1/23/26 indicated, Facility will encourage physician/prescriber or other responsible parties and the DON to act upon the recommendations contained in the monthly drug review.Review of R81's clinical record revealed:5/15/25 - R81 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, depression and an allergy to bee venom. 5/30/25 - An MRR recommended an EpiPen be considered related to R81's bee venom allergy, and that R81's Risperdal prescribed for major depressive disorder was an inappropriate use for an antipsychotic. The recommendations were marked as agreed by R81's physician. 6/29/25 - An MRR recommended an EpiPen be considered related to R81's bee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete records for one (R119) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Findings include:Review of R119's medical record revealed:7/25/25 - The facility provided a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to R119 to relay that services would end on that date.1/23/26 - During the beneficiary notification review, a review of R119's worksheet and relevant documents lacked evidence of the second page, the signature page to validate the resident or their responsible party received and understood the notice.1/23/26 1:15 PM - During an interview, E6 (SW) confirmed the finding and relayed that the facility was unable to locate R119's signature page to their NOMNC.1/27/26 5:45 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON).

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that beard guards were worn during food production in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for service safety with the potential to affect 109 of 109 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. This failure had the potential for physical contamination of the food in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dress Code dated August 30, 2017, revealed sanitary food preparation staff must wear: hair net or a disposable hat while on duty. Any employee with facial hair must wear a beard guard. During observation of the lunch meal preparation on 12/09/24 at 11:45 AM, two male Dietary Aide (DA)2 and DA 3 with beards did not have beard nets covering their beard at the food preparation station. During observation of the dinner meal preparation on 12/09/24 at 4:45 PM, DA2 and DA3,with beards did not have beard nets covering their beard at the food preparation station. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 29 residents (Resident (R) 39 reviewed had their call light accessible for use creating the potential for needs not to be met. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R39 was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adjustment disorder with depressed mood, congestive heart disease, chronic kidney disease stage three, and gout. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/29/24 revealed R39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated R39 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 12/09/24 at 12:44 PM, R39 was in bed and the call light was underneath his bed. On 12/09/24 at 1:09 PM, R39 was observed in bed and the call light was underneath the bed. During an interview at the time of the observation. R39 said he did not know where the call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents (R) R71 and R37 ) of six residents reviewed for abuse, were free from resident-to resident abuse for two separate incidents. This had the potential to affect resident safety at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's abuse policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Misappropriation, Exploitation, and Reasonable Suspicions of Crime, revised January 12, 2023, indicated, . It is the policy of Cadia Healthcare to protect residents and prevent occurrences of abuse . 1. Review of R52's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a Face Sheet located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of depression, dementia, anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/09/24 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an incident of resident-to-resident abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) within two hours of the incident as required for one residents (R)71) from six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment, Misappropriation, Exploitation, and Reasonable Suspicions of Crime, revised January 12, 2023, indicated, . It is the policy of Cadia Healthcare to protect residents and prevent occurrences of abuse .Guidelines .Reporting and Response .Allegations of resident abuse shall be reported to the appropriate state regulatory authority within 2 hours . 1 Review of R52's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a Face Sheet located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of depression, dementia, anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a through investigation of an allegation of abuse for one of six residents (Resident (R) 11) reviewed for abuse and neglect out of a total sample of 29. This failed practice had the potential to affect resident safety at the facility. Findings include: Review of R11's electronic medical records (EMR) revealed the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/23/24 found under the MDS with an admission date of 03/26/23 and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out 15 which indicated R11 was cognitively intact. Interview on 12/10/24 at 8:43AM, R11 stated that he has never had any problems with staff at the facility. R11 also stated that no one has ever been rough with him during care, and no one has ever pulled on his testicles. During an interview on 12/12/24 at 9:30AM, the Director of Nurses (DON) stated that R11 reported on 01/11/24 that while receiving care on 12/25/24, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)9 was rough with him during care; forcefully pulling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-07-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CADIA HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DE