Cadia Rehabilitation Silverside

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 445 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 111 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 99.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported for one of three residents (Resident (R) 80) reviewed for abuse. The facility did not report to the State Agency alleged staff-to-resident abuse within the required time frame. Facility staff did not report R80's allegation of employee-to-resident abuse to the Administrator. This failure to report the allegation in a timely manner allowed the accused staff member to continue working in the facility with other residents. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 07/07/24, undetermined time between 12:00 PM and 3:00 PM. On 03/13/25 at 7:42 PM, the Administrator was notified of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Past Non-Compliance (PNC) in the area of Resident Abuse at F609. Prior to this survey, the facility identified the seriousness and immediacy of the deficient practice and implemented a Removal Plan on 07/11/24. A review of the facility ' s investigation revealed that the episode of failing to report abuse in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for three (R12, R63, and R76) out of three residents sampled for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that the residents received adequate assistance and supervision to prevent accidents to the extent possible. R12, a completely dependent resident, sustained a fall from the bed to the floor while a staff member was providing care and sustained a right ankle fracture. R63, a resident who required extensive assistance for transfers, sustained L2 and L3 fractures during a transfer from the shower bed to the bed and was sent emergently to the hospital. R76, a resident who was completely dependent on staff for transfers, sustained an injury to the top of his head during a transfer from a mechanical lift to his motorized wheelchair. R76 was sent emergently to the hospital and received three staples to his scalp. Findings include: Cross Refer F658 1. R12's clinical record revealed: 1/2/19 – R12 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses, including, but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined that for one (R23) out of thirty-four residents sampled for resident rights the facility failed to ensure R23 was provided with a dignified dining experience during lunch. Findings include:R23's clinical record revealed:6/13/22 - R23 was admitted to the facility.4/22/26 12:39 PM - During an observation R23 was in bed, E27 (CNA) entered the resident's room with R23's lunch tray. E27 placed the lunch tray on the overbed table and then began assisting R23 to eat while standing. E27 remained standing during the time frame that R23 was being assisted with the lunch meal.4/22/26 1:00 PM - During an interview E27 reported [R23] needs assistance with eating. The surveyor asked E27 If you were in the dining room and assisting a resident with their meal would you be sitting or standing E27 stated, I would be sitting E27 then stated and confirmed, I was standing I know that I should have been sitting down, I'm sorry.4/22/6 1:12 PM - Findings were confirmed with E28 (RN).

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews it was determined for one (R23) out of thirty four residents sampled for accommodations the facility failed to ensure R23's call light was within reach. Findings include:R23's clinical record revealed:6/13/22 - R23 was admitted to the facility. 4/22/26 10:39 AM - During an observation R23 was sitting up in the wheelchair near the left side of the foot of the bed. The call light cord was wrapped around the left side enabler at the head of the bed with the call light dangling near the floor.4/22/26 11:52 AM - A second observation revealed R23 sitting up in the wheelchair in the same position and the call light was not within reach.4/22/26 11:57 AM - During an observation E27 (CNA) and another staff CNA entered R23's room with a Hoyer lift to transfer R23 back to the bed.4/22/26 12:06 PM - R23 was observed in bed the call light remained wrapped around the enabler and not within the resident's reach.4/22/26 12:28 PM - E27 was observed in R23's room at this time and then exited the room. Call light remained not within R23's reach.4/22/26 12:43 PM -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that one (R76) out of three residents sampled for choices, the facility failed to ensure that R76, a resident who was completely dependent on the staff for showers, received showers per his preference to maintain good grooming and hygiene. Findings include:R76's clinical records revealed:6/2/22 - R76 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, brain bleed, seizure disorder and craniotomy which resulted in left sided paralysis.6/13/22 - R76's activities of daily living care plan (revised 3/7/24) included, . [R76] has an ADL [Activities of Daily Living] self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] CVA [cardiovascular accident] with left sided hemi [paralysis.] The interventions included, [R76] prefers to have afternoon or evening showers, he is scheduled for hair care/nail care and shower/bed bath weekly on Tuesday and Friday 3-11 shift, notify nurse if [R76] refuses.3/3/26 - R76's quarterly MDS assessment documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R43) out of three residents reviewed for accident hazards, the facility failed to notify the provider when a new skin alteration was identified after an earlier incident where R43 spilled coffee. Findings include: R43's record revealed: 3/5/26 - R43 was admitted to the facility. 3/11/26 - The admission MDS documented that R43 required set-up assistance for eating. 3/30/26 8:30 AM - A nurse's note by E21 (RN/SD) documented, Resident placed his coffee on the bed railing after letting go of the cup it fell back onto his lap spilling onto his bilateral upper thighs. Resident was not wearing pants (sic) this nurse and CNA were about to assist resident with morning care. B/L [Bilateral] upper thighs nonblanchable redness all skin intact at this time. After morning care resident denied pain to the area . 3/30/26 1:47 PM - A nurse's note by E20 (Wound Care RN) documented, Evaluated skin to abdomen, thighs . No scalded skin present. PT [Patient] denies pain. 3/30/26 2:47 PM - A progress note by E19 (NP) documented under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and other facility documentation it was determined for one (R12) out of four residents sampled for falls the facility failed to ensure that an RN performed the initial post fall assessment and documentation after R12 slid off of the bed and was lowered to the floor on the 11 PM-7 AM shift. An RN post fall assessment was not performed until the 7 AM - 3PM shift. Findings include: Cross Refer F689R12's clinical record revealed:1/2/19 - R12 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses including but not limited to anoxic brain injury, abnormal posture, multiple contractures of the upper and lower limbs and idiopathic progressive neuropathy.12/3/25 1:00 AM - A facility reported incident to the division documented [R12] sustained fall 12/3/25 complaint of ankle pain later in day. Xray obtained, results unclear. Repeat film obtained on 12/5/25.12/3/25 8:34 AM - A review of R12's initial post fall assessment was performed by E15 (ADON) on the 7 AM - 3 PM shift. [R12's] clinical record lacked evidence of an initial RN assessment until the next…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of five residents reviewed for communication, the facility failed to provide R1 with a fully functional phone in her room or a location outside her room where calls can be made without being overheard. Findings include:3/26/18 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to stroke.5/24/21 - A diagnosis of hallucinations was added to R1 diagnoses list in the EMR.8/30/22 - R1 was diagnosed with paranoid personality disorder.5/26/23 - A PASARR Level II documented R1, As of 1/24/23, you having ongoing false beliefs and routinely call government agencies sharing your false beliefs. You have paranoia, choose not to take your medication, and sometimes choose not to have your labs. You are hyper-verbal regarding your false beliefs and unable to be redirected. The PASARR Level II documented, At this time you meet PASARR inclusion criteria for Serious mental Illness with the diagnosis of Paranoid Delusional Disorder and Major Depressive disorder. You also have the diagnoses of Paranoid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) out of five residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to have evidence that an attending physician participated in the IDT team care plan meeting. Findings include:1. Review of R1's clinical record revealed:3/26/18 - R1 was admitted to the facility.6/26/25 3:58 PM - R1's EMR documented in a Care Conference Note, . resident refused to be apart (sic) of it. Residents (sic) family was invited, but did not attend. IDT (Interdisciplinary team) members present include Nsg (nursing), UMs (unit managers), dietician, ST (speech therapy), OT (occupational therapy) and SSA (social services assistant). Activities director unable to attend but gave report to SSA. CNA (certified nursing assistant) also provided input for todays (sic) meeting.9/25/25 12:37 PM - R1's EMR documented in a Care Conference Note, . resident stated that she did not want to have a care plan meeting and she refused to participate. Residents family…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R1) out of five residents reviewed for social services, the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to R1, a resident diagnosed with a paranoid personality disorder. Findings include:Cross refer F576, F657 example 1According to the CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual,Section C - Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) revealed the following: . A resident's performance on cognitive tests can be compared over time.-An abrupt change in cognitive status may indicate delirium and may be the only indication of a potentially life-threatening illness.-If performance worsens, then an assessment for delirium and/or depression should be considered, as a decline in mental status may also be associated with a mood disorder.When cognitive impairment is incorrectly diagnosed or missed, appropriate communication, activities, and therapies may not be offered.Section E: Behavior.Hallucinations and delusions may-be distressing to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R3) out of five residents reviewed resident records, the facility failed to accurately document in the EMR that R3 had a responsible party who makes medical decisions. Findings include:10/30/23 - R3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, schizophrenia.7/28/25 - A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) evaluation documented R3 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 9, which was reflective of a moderate cognitive impairment.10/7/25 - F3 (R3's niece/ emergency contact) signed consents for R3 to receive the COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations.11/25/25 1:15 PM - A review of R3's EMR revealed that R3 was listed as her own responsible party despite having a documented BIMS score of 9.12/1/25 11:45 AM - During an interview, E1 (NHA) stated that a BIMS score under 12 showed a questionable cognitive status and the facility then obtains a responsible person who is willing to be the decision maker who signs all consents. E1 stated that the resident continues to be included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to follow Transmission Based Precautions, use proper hand hygiene, and change gloves during incontinent care. These breaches in infection control could cause a spread in disease and affect all the residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy, revised 04/14/21, provided by the facility revealed individuals with suspected or diagnosed communicable disease are placed on the appropriate precaution for that disease, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Employees will follow hand hygiene practices consistent with standards of care . Review of facility provided poster titled, Stop: Enhanced Barrier Precautions Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following high-contact resident care activities: .changing linen .changing briefs or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,608 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,608 — penalty dated 2025-03-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CADIA HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DE