Regal Heights Healthcare & Rehab Center
6525 Lancaster Pike, Hockessin, DE 19707 · For profit - Corporation · 172 certified beds · (302) 998-0181 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604) — most recent May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $119,899 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-23)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.5% | 12.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.6% | 2.1% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 10.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.4% | 13.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.3% | 21.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.8% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 3.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.1% | 20.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.7% | 10.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.0% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.0% | 83.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.8% | 23.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.2% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.45 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.40 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.7%CMS range 33.0–64.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.4–13.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.5–9.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 165.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of R165's clinical record revealed: 11/17/16 - R165 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia and heart failure. 1/5/23 - R165's medical record documented E52's (MD) order: Transfer Status: assist of 2, Bed Mobility: assist of 1, Ambulation 1 person assist with RW (rolling walker) with wheelchair following. 11/22/23 4:30 AM- R165 fell from an elevated bed while receiving incontinence care by E53 (former CNA). 11/22/23 7:07 AM - E54 (Emergency Department MD) documented in the ED (Emergency Department) Physician Record, . History of Present Illness . patient's bed was elevated and they [staff] were changing her when she was rolled and unfortunately fell out of the bed . Secondary Survey- Head: hematoma to the right parietal region . CT (computed tomography) scan chest/abdomen/pelvis shows evidence of acute displaced rib fractures on the right side including ribs 4,6,7 and 9. Also has progressive loss of height of L3 (lumbar vertebrae 3) when compared to prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R70) out of six residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to assure that a physical restraint was used to treat R70's medical symptoms and was not being used for staff convenience. Findings include: R70, a resident with dementia, had two gowns on during the evening shift of 3/31/25. The first gown was on in the correct position. The second gown was oversized and the gown material was gathered and tied in a knot below R70's knees and behind her neck to prevent R70 from exposing herself. R70's oversized gown was not untied and R70 remained in the same position through the evening and night shifts without opportunities for repositioning, incontinence care or release of the knotted oversized gown for mobility. The inability to reposition or straighten one's legs would result in psychosocial harm to a reasonable person. Due to the facility's corrective measures completed on 4/10/25, the facility was notified that R70's incident was a harm past non-compliance. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of other related documents, it was determined that for one (R10) out of nine residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide R10 adequate supervision and assistance to prevent burns. This resulted in harm to R10 as he sustained second-degree burns over 15-20 % of his body surface area. This is being brought forward as past non-compliance with an alleged date of compliance of 10/13/24. Findings include: 2/18/19 - R10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. 3/1/22 - R10's care plan documented, [R10] has impaired verbal communication R/T (related to) cognitive loss . Interventions: . Assess resident's non-verbal behaviors, such as facial expressions, body language, grimacing and increased restlessness . Face resident when communicating . 9/5/24 2:48 PM -E17 (Psych NP) documented in R10's EMR in a Psychiatric Periodic Evaluation note, XXX[AGE] year old male .[R10] is noted with severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of R24's clinical record revealed the following: 2/5/16- R24 was admitted to the facility. 1/30/18- A Physician's order was written for heel boots to bilateral feet as tolerated every shift while in bed. 1/30/18- R24 was care planned for the potential for impaired skin integrity related to incontinence and decreased mobility. 1/30/18- Interventions included, but were not limited to: heel boots to bilateral feet as tolerated when in bed. 7/5/19- A Physician's order was written to consult therapy for interventions as needed. 5/26/23 10:30 AM- R24 was observed lying in her bed. Her right foot was in a soft cast and the left foot/heel was resting directly on the bed. A blue heel protector was on the ledge of the window sill on the right side of the bed and one was in the clear bin near the bedside drawer. No heel boots were on R24. 5/26/23 11:00 AM- R24 was observed lying in bed in the same position. Her left foot/heel was resting on the bed. Heel protectors continued to be on the window ledge and in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free of physical and/or sexual abuse for three of 13 residents (Resident (R)82, R140 and R23). R82 reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 56. Resident (R)82 experienced physical abuse by R153, R140 experience sexual abuse by R48 and R23 experienced verbal abuse Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 28.The Findings Include:1. Review of R153's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and depression. Review of R153's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/08/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Review of R153's Care Plan, initiated on 06/16/25 and located under the Care Plan tab of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to: 1.) report incidents and/or allegations of resident to resident physical and/or sexual abuse to the Administrator within two hours for three of 17 sampled residents (Resident (R) 82, R136, and R55) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 56, and 2.) report injuries of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of four residents (R34) reviewed for accidents out of a total sample of 56. This had the potential to allow for continued abuse.Findings Include:1. Review of R153's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and depression. Review of R153's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/08/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate: 1.) incidents of resident to resident physical and/or sexual abuse for three of 17 sampled residents (Resident (R) 82, R136, and R55) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 56 after R153 physically assaulted R82, R136, and R155; 2.) injuries of unknown origin for one of three residents (R34) reviewed for accidents out of a total sample of 56; and 3.) a potential incident of neglect for one of three residents (R172) reviewed for accidents out of a total ample of 56. These failures placed residents at continued risk of abuse and neglect.Findings Include: 1. Review of R153's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and depression. Review of R153's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/08/26 and located under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R136 and R163) out of four residents reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure that staff treat each resident with respect and dignity. Findings include: 1. 5/16/25 9:00 AM - During a medication pass observation, E16 (LPN) was seen administering medications to R163 who was lying in bed, via PEG/feeding tube (a tube that is passed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall). R163's bedroom door was left opened and she was visible from the hallway by visitors and staff walking by. R163's bed curtain was not pulled out to cover her and provide privacy. 5/16/25 9:20 AM - Finding was discussed with E16 who confirmed that she should have shut the door or pulled the curtain for privacy as a way to treat R163 with dignity and respect while administering her medications. 5/22/25 5:00 PM - Finding was discussed with E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON). 2. Review of R136's clinical record revealed: 12/1/23 - R136 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis of dementia. Observations of R136 during the survey include: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined for one (R95) out of three residents reviewed for participation in care planning, the facility failed to ensure the correct resident representative was invited to participate in R95's care planning conferences. Findings include: Review of R95's clinical record revealed: 11/19/20 - A durable power of attorney (DPOA) financial only document appointing P6 was signed and notarized by R95. 7/1/21 - R95 was admitted to the facility for long-term care. 7/8/21 - The facility's form entitled Preferred Intensity of Medical Care and Treatment was signed by F3 (R95's family member). 7/1/24 8:29 AM - A care conference review documented the following: - R95 had severe cognitive impairment. - R95's resident representative was P6 (R95's DPOA-financial only). P6 was invited, but did not attend. The documented stated, No RSVP. - Does Resident and or Resident/Representative agree with Plan of Care established? YES. - Under the social work section, it was documented that . Nursing reported fall on 6/12/24 and [R95] was sent to the hospital. [F3,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R87) out of four (4) residents reviewed for personal property, the facility failed to provide the family with a written explanation of why R87 moved rooms at the facility's request on 1/23/25. Findings include: 2/23/22 - R87 was admitted to the facility on the C wing with diagnoses including, but was not limited to, dementia. 2/23/22 - 1/23/25, R87 resided on the C wing of the facility. 1/23/25 - R87's room was changed, and she was moved to the A wing of the facility. 5/15/25 2:56 PM - During an interview, F1 (R87's husband) stated, They (the facility staff) told me on a Thursday around 11:30 AM that they were going to move my wife's room. It was [E20] (admission office) who told me. When I asked why, my wife has been on C wing for 3 years, we went to the office (admissions) and . the DON (E2) came in and said it was because she (R87) was hollering. But she has been hollering for years. I had built relationships with the staff on C wing, and they knew my wife. By 2 PM, a lady with a clipboard came in (my wife's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R14 and R110) out of four residents reviewed for assessments, the facility failed to document each residents' insulin usage. Findings include: 1. Review of R110s cinical record revealed: 5/24/22 - R110 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but were not limited to, diabetes and end stage kidney disease. 12/17/24 - E5 (MD) ordered in R110's EMR, Insulin Lispro injection solution 100 unit/ml . subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes. 2/20/25 - R110's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented in Section N - Medications that R100 received 7 days of insulin injections in the look back period but failed to document that R100 was taking a Hypoglycemic (including insulin). The facility failed to accurately document R100's High Risk Drug classes in the 2/20/25 MDS. 5/22/25 12:47 PM - During an interview, E36 (RNAC) confirmed that hypoglycemics was not checked on R110's MDS dated [DATE]. 2. Cross refer to F656 Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R92) out of three residents reviewed for PASRR, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendation from the 9/10/24 PASRR level II determination in R92's care plan. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure for Care of Visually Impaired Resident, last revised March 2021, stated, . 4. When interacting with the visually impaired resident implement the following procedures: a. Use the resident's name when speaking to him/her so he/she will know you are speaking to him/her. b. Introduce anyone else who may be with you. c. Always speak directly to the resident. d. Assist with ADLs as needed or requested. e. Let the resident know when you leave the room. f. Use large lettering on any distributed written information. 5. To help the resident orient and avoid accidents in the environment implement the following practices: a. Use nightlights to help the resident with dark adaptation problems. b. When the resident dines, describe the location of the place setting and food on the plate according to the clock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Cross refer to F641, example 2 Review of R14's clinical record revealed: 8/19/24 - R14 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of diabetes. Review of R14's comprehensive care plan lacked evidence of an individualized care plan with approaches for R14's diabetes diagnosis and use of insulin. 5/22/25 12:55 PM - During an interview, E39 (LPN/UM) confirmed the finding. 5/23/25 2:30 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON). Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R22 and R14) out of 35 sampled residents, the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan to address an identified need for R22. For R14, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for R14's diagnosis and treatment of diabetes. Findings include: 1. Review of R22's clinical record revealed: 12/13/22 - R22 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease with a need for assistance with personal care and a non - pressure ulcer of the left ankle. 12/13/22 - A care plan was developed for R22's risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R65) out of thirty-five sampled residents, the facility failed to have a comprehensive care plan in complaince with the standard of practice regarding R65's dental cleanings and risk for infective endocarditis. Findings include: Subacute Bacterial Endocarditis Prophylaxis -Infective endocarditis is an infection of the heart's endocardial surfaces involving one or more heart valves . Several risk factors can predispose patients to infective endocarditis, including structural heart disease, prosthetic heart valves, indwelling cardiovascular device . National Library of Medicine, STATPEARLS 2025, Updated February 10, 2024 [Hospital] LVAD Heartmate Discharge Binder- . Important Information Regarding Dental Procedures- Please let your dentist know that you have an artificial heart pump and will need prophylactic antibiotics for any procedure that invades the gums. This includes basic dental cleaning. There is the potential that bacteria could invade the blood stream and possibly contaminate the LVAD . 7/12/18 - R65 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R70) out of 35 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident who was unable to carry out out activities of daily living. Findings include: Cross refer F604 Review of R70's records revealed: 9/24/19 - R70 was admitted to the facility. 9/25/19 (revised 5/1/20) - R70's ADL care plan stated, [R70] was unable to do own ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) without assist related to cognitive loss and interventions included . toileting schedule as resident allows . 9/25/19 (revised 10/18/23) - R70 was care planned for incontinence of bowel and bladder related to cognition and interventions included . encourage highest level of independence of toileting as possible and toilet at regular intervals if able. 2/21/25 - R70's quarterly MDS assessment indicated that R70's cognition was severely impaired with short and long term memory problems. R70 was dependent with toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of urine and bowel. 5/20/25 1:50 PM - During interview, E14 stated, . I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R22) out of one sampled resident reviewed for hearing/vision, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that R22 received proper treatment and assistive device to maintain hearing abilities. Findings include: Review of R22's clinical record revealed: 12/13/22 - Resident was admitted to the facility. 12/19/22 - R22's admission MDS indicated that R22's cognition was intact, had adequate hearing and did not use a hearing aid. 1/18/23 - R22 had a care plan developed for impaired verbal communication related to hard of hearing with interventions including to assess [R22's] hearing and vision, and if deficits are noted, refer resident for further evaluation and treatment. 3/13/23 - R22's quarterly MDS indicated that R22 had minimal difficulty with hearing and did not use a hearing aid. 1/18/23 - R22 had a care plan developed for impaired verbal communication related to hard of hearing with interventions including to asses [R22's] hearing and vision, and if deficits are noted, refer resident for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of the facility's policy and procedures it was determined that the facility failed to provide the appropriate care and services to one (R163) out of one sampled resident who had a PEG/feeding tube through the abdomen into the stomach for medication administration. Findings include: Cross refer F759 Review of R163's clinical record revealed: 3/28/25 - R163 was admitted to the facility. 3/31/25 - R163 had a care plan developed for potential for alteration in nutrition/hydration related to NPO (eating nothing by mouth) status and traumatic brain injury requiring tube feeding for nutrition/hydration. R163's interventions included tube feeding and flushes as ordered. 3/28/25 - R163 had a physician's feeding tube order to flush tube with 5 ml (milliliters) of water between each medication. 3/28/25 - R163 had a physician's feeding tube order to flush with 30 ml of water before and after each medication. 4/3/25 - R163's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated that R163 had an intact cognition and is dependent with the use of the feeding tube…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R1 and R81) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory, the facility failed to have the CPAP( a repiratory device the deliers continuous positive airway pressure) settings written in the orders. Findings include: 1. Review of R21's clinical record revealed: 12/13/24 - R21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, obstructive sleep apnea. 12/13/24 - P2 (NP) ordered in R21's EMR, CPAP on at HS (hour of sleep), off in AM in the morning and at bedtime apply. The facility failed to order the CPAP machine settings required for R21's care. 2. Review of R81's clinical record revealed: 7/8/24 - R81 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, obstructive sleep apnea. 8/3/24 - E5 (DO) ordered in R81's EMR, CPAP on at HS, off in AM, settings at bedtime apply and in the morning remove. The facility failed to order the CPAP machine settings required for R81's care. 5/22/25 11:07 AM - During a telephone interview, P5 (respiratory therapist) stated, Those two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. During medication pass observation on 5/16/25, 9 medication errors out of fourty four opportunities were identified, resulting in a medication error of 20.45% and affecting 1 resident (R163). Findings include: Cross refer F693 Observation of R163s' medication pass via the peg/feeding tube (a tube that is passed into a patient's stomach through the abdominal wall) revealed the following: 5/16/25 8:45 AM - E16 (LPN) opened the drawer of the medication cart and pulled out R163's morning medications. E16 proceeded to open the following medications and put into the medication cup: - Aspirin 81 mg capsule 1 cap - Multivitamin tablet 1 tab - Vitamin B12 1,000 mcg 1 tab - Vitamin D3 25 mcg 2 tablets - Gabapentin 300 mg 1 capsule - Magnesium Oxide 400 mg 1 tablet - Dantrolene Sodium 25 mg 1 capsule - Midodrine HCL 5 mg 1 tablet 5/16/25 8:48 AM - E16 poured the oral medications into the pill crusher pouch and then used the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to have proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) worn for two employees after direct resident contact during bedside patient care observations. In addition, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and change gloves for one employee during a wound dressing change observation. Findings include: The facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions (2001) documented, . 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as infection prevention and control interventions to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents . 2. 3. Gloves and gowns are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activities . 4. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is changed and hand hygiene performed before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R119, R143, R158, R160 and R267) out of ten residents reviewed for vaccines, the facility failed to ensure that these residents' vaccination status was accurately documented. For four (R119, R143, R158, R267) out of ten residents reviewed for vaccines, the facility failed to offer the four residents the pneumococcal vaccine. For six (R119, R143, R158, R160, R267) out of ten residents reviewed for vaccines, the facility failed to assess and document the residents' influenza vaccine. For R267, the facility failed to check Delvax, where there was documentation of a flu vaccine on 9/18/2024. Findings include: 1. Review of R119's clinical record revealed: 2/20/25 - R119 was admitted to the facility. 5/19/25 11:25 AM - A review of R119's EMR revealed no evidence of the facility assessing and offering R119 the influenza and the pneumococcal vaccines. 2. Review of R143's clinical record revealed: 4/14/25 - R143 was admitted to the facility. 5/19/25 11:28 AM - A review of R143's EMR revealed no evidence of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for three (R143, R158, R160) out of ten residents reviewed for vaccines, the facility failed to assess and offer the COVID vaccine. Findings include: 1. Review of R143's clinical record revealed: 4/14/25 - R143 was admitted to the facility. 5/19/25 11:28 AM - A review of R143's EMR revealed no evidence of the facility assessing and offering R143 the COVID vaccine. 2. Review of R158's clinical record revealed: 2/26/25 - R158 was admitted to the facility. 5/19/25 11:32 AM - A review of R158's EMR revealed no evidence of the facility assessing and offering R158 the COVID vaccine. 3. Review of R160's clinical record revealed: 2/27/25 - R160 was admitted to the facility. 5/19/25 11:35 AM - A review of R160's EMR revealed no evidence of the facility assessing and offering R160 the COVID vaccine. 5/20/25 2:45 PM - The facility was unable to provide evidence of these residents' vaccination or declination of the vaccines when documentation was requested. 5/21/25 11:30 AM - During an interview, E2 (DON) stated that the facility was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R65) out of thirty-five sampled residents, the facility failed to provide and evaluate staff for appropriate competencies and skill sets regarding R65's LVAD (left ventricular assist device) as identified in the resident assessment. Findings include: 5/19/25 1:30 PM - A review of the facility assessment, Section III Resources Needed documented the facility as having Special Care Needs population regarding: dialysis, hospice, ostomy care, tracheostomy care, bariatric care, palliative care, end of life care and LVAD (left ventricular assist device). 5/19/25 4:21 PM - During an interview, E1 (NHA) stated, I don't have competencies for the LVAD. [E41], the unit manager, has started some education for the LVAD but we don't have anything formalized. We need to get the staff more education on this. 5/20/25 2:15 PM - During an interview, R65 stated that the staff were knowledgeable about his LVAD. R65 stated that during the weekly drive line exit site dressing change, the staff wear the gowns and gloves. 5/20/25 2:35 PM -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R167) out of six (6) residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that R167 was protected from verbal abuse. Findings include: Review of R167's clinical records revealed: 11/12/24 - R167 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including end stage renal failure, heart failure and morbid obesity. 2/11/25 - R167's quarterly MDS documented a BIMS score of 15, indicating a cognitively intact status. The MDS also documented that R167 was independent with activities of daily living. 4/2/25 8:00 PM - The facility's investigation documented that R167 wanted to take a shower but there were used towels on the bathroom floor. He requested that the bathroom be cleaned. E6 (CNA) told R167, If you don't think I am doing my job, then speak to the supervisor. Approximately one hour later, E6 overheard R167 telling his significant other on the phone about the dirty towels in the shower. E6 stated, Why are you still talking about it? It was a mistake. E6 began to yell profanities at him. Both E6 and R167 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R6 and R22) of six residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within two hours. Findings include: 1. Review fo R22's clinical record revealed: 5/3/25 8:30 AM - A facility incident report documented, . [R22] presents wit (sic) 2 bruises on the the inner side of the left arm above the elbow. Main bruise is 13.0 x 10.5 and smaller bruise above it is 2.5 x 3.0. [R22] did not know how it occurred. RCA (Root Cause Analysis) Summary: . bruises appear that they may have been caused by a hand that may have been facilitating a transfer . [R22] also noted to have been transported to the dentist by family on 4/30/25 .also noted to be on aspirin therapy . 5/20/25 3:00 PM - Review of the state incident report database lacked evidence that the facility reported the incident to the state incident reporting center. 5/22/25 - A written statement by E2 (DON) documented, I have observed family both daughter and son, have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one resident (R108) out of four (4) residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that R108 received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents to the extent possible. R108 was left sitting on the side of the bed during care and fell to the floor. R108 sustained a large hematoma on her forehead and was sent emergently to hospital. Findings include: Review of R108's clinical records revealed: 3/22/24 - R108 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia, major mood disorder and age-related osteoporosis. 3/24/24 - R108's fall care plans included, Potential for (actual) falls r/t (related to) poor safety awareness Resident will not sustain or be injured from falls X 90 days. The interventions included, Bed in lowest position when care is not being provided. 2/24/25 - E108's annual MDS documented a BIMS score of 00, indicating a completely impaired cognitive status, and was completely dependent on staff for dressing and undressing of both lower and upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for three (R15, R19, R20) out of seven residents reviewed for falls, the facility failed to meet professional standards of the Delaware Board of Nursing Scope of practice by failing to have a registered nurse (RN) complete and document an RN post- fall assessment . Findings include: Delaware State Board of Nursing - RN, LPN and NA/UAP Duties 2024 . RN (registered nurse) .post-fall assessment and documentation . 1. Review of R15's clinical record revealed: 3/31/18 - R15 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, stroke and difficulty walking. 4/28/24 5:40 AM - E12 (LPN) documented in R15's EMR (electronic medical record), While standing at the med cart, a loud thump could be heard .she [R15] could be seen laying on the floor, the supervisor was then called to the room to assess the resident. The resident was assessed and vitals were taken . 4/28/24 6:30 AM - E12 (LPN) documented in R15's EMR, left with EMS (emergency medical services). Review of R15's EMR progress notes after the 4/28/24 fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of other facility documents as indicated, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (R14) out of one resident was provided respiratory care consistent with physician's orders. Findings include: 6/6/22 - R14 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and dysphonia (difficult speech). R14's admission MDS documented R14's speech clarity as being no speech, absence of spoken words. On 6/7/24 the following progress notes were written: 10:37 AM - E14 (LPN) wrote that at 10:30 AM R14 wrote a note was complaining of having a hard time breathing and that E14 and E15 (RN) assessed [R14's] oxygen level to be in the low 70's, with an elevated heart rate of 104. We got her to calm down so she could control her breathing which worked her 02 started increasing to low 80's, reached out to NP to obtain a stat chest x-ray and some oxygen. 10:51AM - E14 wrote that R14 was still having a hard time breathing, after taking a listen to her he (sic) is wheezing and her 02 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R12) out of one residents sampled for pain management, the facility failed to monitor the resident's pain to the extent possible in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and care plan, and current professional standards of practice. Findings include: 4/4/22 - R12 admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia. 2/5/25 - a review of R12's care plan dated 4/4/22 reveals that staff should assess for verbal or non-verbal signs and symptoms of pain. A review of R12's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)could not be conducted because the resident is rarely/never understood. The same MDS identifies R12's Speech Clarity: Unclear speech - slurred or mumbled words; Ability to express ideas and wants: Rarely/never understood; Ability to Understand others: Rarely/never understands. 8/29/24 - R12 admitted to hospice. 9/22/24 - At approximately 7:20 PM, nurse aides providing care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R1) out of seven residents reviewed for falls, the facility failed to have complete, readily accessible medical records regarding the required post-fall assessment. Findings include: Review of R1's clinical record revealed: 12/10/07 - R1 admitted to facility for CAD (coronary artery disease), HTN (hypertension), PVD (peripheral vascular disease), and right-sided hemiplegia. 10/2/24 - Progress note entered by E11 (RN, charge nurse) at approximately 8:45 PM revealed R1 was found on the floor of his room. He explained to staff that he was removing the footrests from his wheelchair in preparation for going to bed as he does every night. He leaned forward too far and fell out of his chair and onto the floor. R1 has a BIMS of 15 (indicating a resident is cognitively intact), according to his MDS dated [DATE]. 10/2/24 8:56 PM - Progress note entered by E11 (RN, charge nurse) states Resident assessed with small skin tear to right lower leg .resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R10) out of twenty-eight residents reviewed for environment, the facility failed to maintain the water supply/patient care equipment was in safe operating condition. Findings include: Facility 's Safety of Water Temperatures policy- Domestic water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range of 95-110 degrees to prevent scalding of residents and to maintain temps (temperatures) for infection control and good handwashing practices . 2. Mixing valves are to be set at 110 degrees to ensure domestic water temperatures are provided to resident rooms, bathroom common area fixtures and shower/tub rooms . 3. Maintenance staff are responsible for checking thermostats, mixing valves and temperature controls in the facility. 4. Maintenance staff shall conduct daily water temperature checks and record the water temperature in a water temperature log . 6. Recordings will be taken on each wing or floor, the date, time and location is to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for four out of five unit's nourishment areas the facility failed to ensure unit refrigerator food items were dated and labeled. Findings include: The facility policy on Food brought by family/visitors last updated March 2024 indicated, Food bought in by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later is labeled, resident name and date. The following observations were made during unit refrigerator tours: - 4/24/24 11:08 AM - The [NAME] unit refrigerator contained one undated, unlabeled garden salad. Finding immediately confirmed by E10 unit clerk. - 4/24/24 11:10 AM - The Eastburn unit freezer/refrigerator contained an undated and unlabeled bag of frozen food, a tea bag, and a bowl of cold cereal. E46 (RN) immediately confirmed the finding. - 4/26/24 1:54 PM - The [NAME] unit refrigerator contained an unlabled and undated pint of fresh strawberries and a Tupperware inside a Ziploc bag. E45 (RN) immediately confirmed the finding. - 4/26/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R154 and R28) out of 40 residents observed the facility failed to ensure the residents right for a dignified existence and privacy was upheld. Findings include: 1. 4/18/24 12:11 PM - During a lunch observation on the [NAME] unit E43 (LPN) referred to R154 as a feeder when removing the resident's lunch tray from the dining care. E43 then stood over R154 while assisting R154 with her meal. E43 immediately confirmed the finding. 2. 4/25/24 11:22 AM - 11:58 AM- During a dressing change observation the privacy curtain to R28's room remained opened. Additionally, E44 (RN) placed a bandage on R28's foot and buttocks. After placing the bandage on R28, E44 then signed and dated the bandages while they were already on the resident. E44 immediately confirmed the finding. 5/1/24 at 1:30 PM - Finding was reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E28 (CRM) and representatives with the Ombudsman's Office.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R35) out of four residents reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to offer R35 the opportunity to formulate an advanced directive. Findings include: R35's clinical record revealed: 1/29/24 - R35's quarterly MDS assessment documented that she was cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15. Review of R35's clinical record lacked evidence that R35 was offered the opportunity to formulate an advanced directive. 4/26/24 at 2 PM - During an interview, E42 (SW) reviewed the facility's process and acknowledged that R35 was not offered the opportunity to formulate a written advanced directive. E42 stated that she would check with R35 right now and offer the opportunity. 5/1/24 at 1:30 PM - Finding was reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E28 (CRM) and representatives with the Ombudsman's Office.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R130) out of six residents sampled for nutrition and one (R146) out of seven residents sampled for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the MDS assessments for each resident. Findings include: 1. R130's clinical record revealed: 12/11/23 - R130's physician ordered diet was mechanical soft texture. 4/16/24 - R130's quarterly MDS assessment was not accurately coded to reflect his mechanical diet. 4/24/24 at 10:01 AM - During an interview, finding was confirmed with E48 (RNAC). 2. R146's clinical record revealed: 2/23/23 (revised) - R146 was care planned for requiring hemodialysis for a diagnosis of end stage renal disorder with an approach that specified the offsite location and the treatment days: Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. 2/16/24 - R146's quarterly MDS assessment was not accurately coded to reflect his required ongoing dialysis treatment under Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs. 5/1/24 at 10:42 AM - During an interview, finding was confirmed with E48 (RNAC). 5/1/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R29) out of three residents reviewed for dental services the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's missing teeth. Additionally, for one (R169) out of three residents reviewed for behavior, the facility failed to develop a person centered care plan to address R169's new medical diagnoses of depression and anxiety disorder. Findings include: 1. 12/5/23 - An admission MDS assessment documented R29 had obvious cavity or broken natural teeth. During initial pool screening on 4/18/24 at 12:18 PM, R29 was observed to have missing teeth. During an interview on 4/19/24 at 10:43 AM, FM1 stated, He is losing teeth like crazy and I am worried about that. 4/20/24 - Review of R29's clinical record lacked evidence of a care plan that addressed the resident's broken teeth. During an interview on 4/24/24 at 12:33 PM, E17 (RN) and unit manager confirmed a care plan for R29's missing teeth had not been created but that one would be created immediately. 2. Review of R169's clinical records revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it has been determined that for one (R41) out of one resident reviewed for range of motion and mobility, the facility failed to provide appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain function and mobility or prevent further decrease in range of motion to R41's left wrist and hand. Findings include: Review of R41's clinical record revealed: 3/14/24 - R41 was readmitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to stroke, left side weakness and contractures. 2/9/23 - A review of the facility contracture measurement comparison evaluation revealed R41 has severe contractures to the left wrist and left hand. 2/2/24 - A review of the facility contracture measurment comparison evaluation revealed R41 has severe contractures to the left wrist and left hand. 3/13/24 3:00 PM - A treatment order for R41 documented adaptive equipment left hand/wrist orthotic to be donned for five hours as tolerated, with skin checks performed every shift for hand therapy. 4/18/24 11:01 AM - R41 was observed in bed and did not have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R91, R132 and R136) out of five residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that each resident were free from abuse. Findings include: A facility policy dated 2001, revised 4/21, and titled, Abuse, Neglect .Prevent Program, documented, Residents have the right to be free from abuse . Review of R136's clinical records revealed: 1. 6/18/22 - R136 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including right sided weakness, anxiety, and depression. R136's BIMS score was 13 (cognitively intact). 6/21/22 - R136's care plan documented, Approach calmly and give empathy, support and compassion. a. 8/18/23 4:30 PM - R136 reported that he felt that E27 (LPN) was disrespectful and rude to him when she told him she was not going to bring his medications out to the front of the building anymore. 4/21/24 10:20 AM - During an interview, R136 stated, I live at this facility because I can't remember to take my medications at home. I tried to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. 9/4/23 - R174 was admitted to the facility. A review of the clinical record revealed the following 9/4/23 facility admission assessments conducted by E68 (LPN): admission evaluation, AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) evaluation, Bladder and Bowel Continence evaluation, Braden (scale for predicting pressure ulcer risk) evaluation, Elopement evaluation, Fall Risk evaluation and Skilled Nurse admission note. Of note, E40 (RN) completed the Side Rail/Restraint evaluation and E47 (RN) completed the Skin Only evaluation. 3. 11/27/23 - R176 was admitted to the facility. A review of the clinical record revealed the following 11/27/23 facility admission assessments conducted by E64 (LPN): admission evaluation, AIMS evaluation, Bladder and Bowel Continence evaluation, Braden evaluation, Elopement evaluation, Fall Risk evaluation, Side Rail/ Restraint evaluation, Smoking Screen evaluation and Skilled Nurse admission note. Of note, E19 (RN) did complete the Skin Only evaluation. 4. 11/1/23 - R177 was admitted to the facility. A review of the clinical record revealed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-01 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R12, R165, R174) out of five reviewed for Accidents, the facility failed to ensure that the physician conducted the required visits. Findings include: 1. Review of R12's clinical record revealed: 1/24/14 - R12 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses including but not limited to, dementia and atrial fibrillation. 6/20/23 - R12 was examined by E52 (MD). 1/20/24 - R12 was examined by E52 (MD). R12 went 213 days between physician visits instead of the 120 days as required 2. Review of R174's clinical record revealed: 9/4/23 - R174 was admitted to the facility. 9/6/23 - R174 was examined by E52 (MD). 12/7/23 - R174 was examined by E52 (MD). R174 went 92 days between physician visits. During the first 90 days of an admission to a skilled nursing facility, by regulation a patient should be examined every 30 days. 3. Review of R176's clinical record revealed: 11/27/23 - R176 was admitted to the facility. 11/28/23 - R176 was examined by E52 (MD). R176 was not seen by a physician during December 2023. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R132) out of five residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report staff to resident abuse to the State Agency within the two hour requirement. Findings include: Cross refer to F600, example 3 The facility's policy and procedure entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised September 2022, stated, . 1. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials . 2. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: a. The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; . 3. 'Immediately' is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving abuse . Review of the facility's investigation revealed: 7/24/23 - On the 3-11 PM shift, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R35) out of six residents reviewed for communication-sensory, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided communication assistive devices. Findings include: R35's clinical record revealed: 6/16/22 (revised) - R35 was care planned for impaired verbal communication related to dsyarthria (speech disorder caused by muscle weakness or control problems in the mouth, face or throat) and she can write on paper with a pen. One intervention was to provide paper and pen for the resident to communicate with. 1/29/24 - The quarterly MDS assessment documented that R35 has no speech, but she has the ability to express her ideas/wants and to understand others. R35 was cognitively intact and used a walker. On 2/1/24, according to the Prehospital Care Report documented by the Basic Life Safety (BLS) crew: - at 11:27 AM - 911 was called by the facility for medical transport to the ER for R35's pain; - at 11:41 AM - Upon arrival the patient was found sitting outside of (name of facility) with staff. Staff advised the patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R53 and R120) out of six residents reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living), the facility failed to ensure each resident was provided toileting care per each resident's care plan. Findings include: 1. R53's clinical record revealed: 11/17/23 - R53 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cancer, heart failure, depression, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event that can last from months or years, with triggers that can bring back the memories of the trauma accompanied by intense emotional and physical reactions) and diabetes. 12/1/23 - R53 was care planned for incontinence of bowel and bladder with interventions that included, but were not limited to: - check resident every two hours and PRN (as needed); - incontinence care after each incontinent episode; - toilet after meals - urinal and bedpan (date initiated 12/6/23); and - use absorbent products as needed. 1/23/24 -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R120) out of six residents reviewed for ADLs, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff on 12/17/23 day shift to provide toileting care in accordance with the resident's care plan. Findings include: Cross refer to F677, example 2 R120's clinical record revealed: 12/1/22 - R120 was care planned for incontinence of bowel and bladder with the following interventions: - check resident every two hours and PRN; - incontinence care after each incontinent episode; - offer toileting before/after meals and at bed time (initiated 1/8/23, revised 8/2/23); - toilet at regular intervals if able; and - use absorbent products as needed. 4/30/23 at 10:23 AM - During an interview with the Surveyor, E36 stated that she was the assigned CNA on 12/17/23 (Sunday) day shift. E36 stated that the Unit was short staffed that day, only three CNAs when usually it was four. E36 stated that when this happens, the resident workload goes from eight residents to 10-12 residents. E36 explained that the CNAs try to get up the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper food storage, food handling, and food service worker and Nursing staff personal hygiene. Findings include: The following were observed on 5/25/23 during the initial kitchen tour from 8:40 AM to 9:30 AM: 1. All the hand sinks were dirty and not cleaned; 2. The walk-in refrigerator floor was dirty; 3. The walk-in refrigerator was pooling water from the condenser; 4. The walk-in refrigerator was using dirty trays to hold vegetables; 5. The walls in the facility were not kept clean; Findings were reviewed and confirmed by E1 (NHA) on 5/25/23 at approximately 10:00 AM. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1, E2 (DON), and E3 (ADON) on 6/8/23, at approximately 2:30 PM.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-08 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively monitory and timely clean and sanitize areas of pest droppings. Findings include During the initial kitchen tour on 5/25/23 from 8:40 AM to 9:30 AM, it was observed that the dry storage shelf containing sugar had mouse dropping, mouse prints, and urine trails. E1 (NHA) was made aware and confirmed the finding at 10:00 AM. A second observation of the same location in the dry storage room was made on 5/31/23 at approximately 11:00 AM, and some of the original mouse droppings discovered on 5/25/23 were still there. E1 was made aware and confirmed the finding at 11:10 AM. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1, E2 (DON), and E3 (ADON) on 6/8/23 at approximately 2:30 PM.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the QAA committee measured the success of actions, track performance and regularly review, analyze, and act on data collected. Findings include: 6/8/23 9:08 AM - An observation of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) binder revealed the lack of audit tools for performance improvement project analysis. 6/8/23 9:45 AM - During an interview, E1 stated that performance project audit tools had not been created consistently for the analysis of performance projects in progress. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (RN Risk Manager) on 6/8/23 at approximately 2:30 PM.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation of three out of five units toured, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment. Findings include: 1. 6/1/23 12:03 PM - During an observation of the Ashland unit, room A16 was observed with the air conditioning unit having a broken cover. 2. 6/1/23 12:17 PM - During an observation of the [NAME] unit, room C9's bathroom floor was observed to be sticky with a strong smell of urine. 3. 6/1/23 12:27 PM - During an observation of the [NAME] unit, room H101 was observed to have brownish/black discoloration on the floor underneath a supply cart, and dust/grime on the floor near the radiator. Lastly, it was observed that room H104's air conditioning unit's cover was off, laying against the wall and bedside table revealing a dirty filter that was black in color. 6/1/23 12:47 PM - E32 (Maintenance Supervisor) confirmed findings. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), and E3 (ADON) on 6/8/23, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for four (R6, R24, R80 and R89) out of five sampled residents for respiratory care, the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing, in addition, the facility failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions for cleaning the oxygen concentrator's filter for R80 and R89. For R6, the facility failed to ensure that staff used sterile gloves when providing respiratory care to R6 during a procedure that required the use of sterile gloves. For R24, the facility failed to provide emergency tracheostomy (trach- an opening surgically created in the neck into the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) and as needed (PRN) oxygen supplies for trach care. Findings include: Review of the manufacturer's recommended instructions to clean the oxygen concentrator filter included: 1. Remove the filter and clean at least once a week depending on environmental conditions. 2. Clean the cabinet filter with a vacuum cleaner or wash in warm soapy water and rinse thoroughly. Note environmental conditions that may require more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R34, R117 and R222) out of six residents sampled for medication review, the facility (Nursing and/or Physician) failed to consistently act on irregularities identified during Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) by the Pharmacist. Findings include: Review of the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy, dated May 2019, stated, The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly .the attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it. The consultant pharmacist provides the director of nursing services and medical director with a written, signed and dated copy of all medication regimen reports. Copies of medication regimen review reports, including physician responses, are maintained as part of the permanent medical record. 1. Review of R222's clinical record revealed: 6/7/23 - R222's MRRs from November 2022 - February 2023 were reviewed. The Pharmacist identified irregularities on 12/31/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the facility's Infection Control records, the facility failed to ensure that monthly tracking and surveillance data was collected and entered into the monthly Infection Control Logs and reviewed, analyzed and acted upon, if indicated. In addition, the facility lacked evidence that their IPCP (Infection Prevention and Control Program), including standards, policies and procedures were reviewed annually. Findings include: 1a. The facility's policy and procedure entitled Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes, last revised on 12/2016, stated, . All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented on the facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The information gathered will include: a. resident name .; b. unit and room number; c. date symptoms appeared; d. name of antibiotic .; e. start date of antibiotic; f. pathogen identified .; g. site of infection; h. date of culture; i. stop date; j. total days of therapy; k. outcome; and l. adverse events. Review of the following months of surveillance data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide training to three out of four of the Unit Managers (E6, E9, and E66) regarding the procedure for reporting incidents of abuse or neglect as evidenced by the Unit Managers (UM) being unable to or incorrectly state the time frame that such incidents need to be reported to the State Agency. Findings include: Cross refer F609 1a. 10/4/22 - E6 (RN/Unit Manager) completed Abuse and Neglect training inservice. 11/10/22 - E6 completed Abuse and Neglect training inservice. 5/15/23 4:45 PM - E6 completed Relias' Preventing, Recognizing and Reporting Abuse training. 6/5/23 10:21 AM - During an interview, E6 (RN), whose hire date was 4/27/2009, stated, The DON reports cases of suspected abuse or neglect during day shift. On the off shift or weekends when covering, I would report it. When asked about specific time frames for reporting, E6 stated, I did not know there is one. 1b. 12/23/22 11:57 AM - E9 (LPN/Unit Manager) completed Relias' Preventing, Recognizing and Reporting Abuse training. 6/5/23 10:56…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy review, and interview, it was determined that the facility lacked evidence that two (R34 and R154) out of four residents reviewed for care planning, was afforded the opportunity to participate in their care planning conference. Findings include: The facility's policy on care planning titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised December 2016, reads, .The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident .Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan will be consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of care .The resident will be informed of his or her right to participate in his or her treatment . 1. Review of R154's clinical record revealed: 9/28/22 - R154 was admitted to the facility with a past medical history of brain damage and was assessed to have a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 14 (13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan and/or add interventions as needed related to smoking for two (R22 and R84) out of five residents sampled for smoking. Findings include: 1. R84's clinical record revealed: 6/4/18 - R84 was admitted to the facility. 9/23/22 - R84's care plan review lacked smoking as a focus area. 3/6/23 - The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented R84 as having mild cognitive impairment. 5/26/23 11:52 AM - R84's Smoking Screen Evaluation answered Safety question 10 Plan of care is used to assure resident is safe while smoking? Yes. 5/29/23 - R84's care plan was revised, however, it continued to lack smoking as a focus area. 2. R22's clinical record revealed: 4/5/18 - R22 was admitted to the facility. 3/30/23 13:23 PM - R22's Smoking Screen Evaluation answered Safety question 8 Resident need for adaptive equipment 8b. smoking apron (checked), 8c. supervision (checked). 3/31/23 - The MDS assessment documented that R22 was cognitively intact. 4/24/23 - R22's at risk for injury related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R60) out of 32 sampled residents for care plan review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect an identified need. Findings include: Review of R60's clinical record revealed: 2/14/23 - R60 was admitted to the facility. 2/15/23 - R60 had a care plan problem for inability to do her own ADLs without assistance related to weakness, with interventions that included requiring total care for her weekly shower two days per week and to clean and check fingernails and toenails. 5/30/23 9:10 AM - R60 was observed in bed with very long fingernails on both hands; dirty fingernails were also observed on her left contracted hand. 6/1/23 9:51 AM - R60 was observed in bed with long fingernails on both hands; dirty fingernails were also observed on her left hand. 6/1/23 11:06 AM - R60 was observed in bed with long fingernails on both hands; dirty fingernails were also observed on her left hand. 6/1/23 11:35 AM - E52 (CNA) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R154) out of two sampled residents reviewed for vision and hearing, the facility failed to ensure that the resident received proper treatment to maintain vision. Findings include: Review of R154's clinical record revealed: 5/2/23 - Due to a complaint of a decrease in vision, R154 received an eye exam in the facility from the facility's vision provider. The eye exam found R154 to have cataracts (clouded, blurred, and/or dimmed vision) in both eyes. The vision provider gave the facility a copy of the eye exam result, which included a referral for R154 to have eye surgery. 5/25/23 - During an interview with R154, he stated, I have cataracts. I am supposed to have surgery. I don't know when, they never told me. I cannot see well. 6/1/23 10:00 AM - E29 (Social Service) described how the facility carries out recommendations made by their vision provider and stated that the vision provider, comes into the building, Social Services receives the consults/recommendations and places it in the Dr.'s book for the NP (Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for two (R27 and R154) out of four residents reviewed for ROM (Range of Motion)/mobility, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to maintain or prevent further decline in function/mobility. The facility failed to provide R154 with restorative services while R154's orthotic devices (an artificial support or brace for the limbs or spine) for contracture management were in the laundry. For R27, the facility failed to ensure that R27 received PROM (Passive Range of Motion) exercise daily as prescribed. Findings include: 1. Review of R154's clinical record revealed: 9/28/22 - R154 was admitted to the facility with contractures (the shortening of certain tendons, muscles or other connective tissues causing loss of full extension of the affected joints) of both hands. 3/13/23 - R154's Physician orders read, Left Upper extremity wrist hand orthotic devices on as tolerated to a maximum of 1 hour. 4/6/23 - R154's Physician orders read, Upper extremity orthotic devices on as tolerated. Right hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's environment remained free of accident hazards when R1 was incorrectly transferred from a bed to a wheelchair with a Hoyer full body mechanical lift with the use of a sling. Findings include: 5/26/23 - R1 was admitted to the facility. 6/14/23 -The EMR CNA Care Plan History Task List ([NAME]) documented R1's transfer status is a 2- person assist. 7/26/23 - The Facility Plan of Correction from the survey ending 6/8/23 documented that staff educator/designee will educate nursing staff on ensuring residents environment remains free of accident hazards. Education will include: following each residents proper mobility status that is listed on the [NAME] in POC, ensuring that proper lift slings are being used for residents requiring a mechanical lift for transfers. 8/9/23 12:50 PM - R1 was observed in the [NAME] Wing small dining room in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and policy review, it was determined that for one (R34) out of six residents reviewed for MRR, the facility failed to ensure for R34 that the PRN psychotrophic medication, Xanax, was limited to a 14 day duration or to have the Provider document the reason for a prolonged period of PRN psychotrophic medication (30 days). Findings include: Cross refer to F756 Review of the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) policy, stated, The consultant pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly .The MRR involves a thorough review of the resident's medical record to prevent, identify, report and resolve medication related problems, medication errors and other irregularities, for example: .a. medications ordered in excessive doses or without clinical indications .g). incorrect medications, administration times or dosage forms; or . R34's clinical record revealed: 2/1/22- R34 was admitted to the facility. 5/8/23 1:00 PM- E48's (NP) Progress note documented, Resident lying in bed in no acute distress . Assessment: .Generalized anxiety disorder Zoloft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of a clinical record and other resources as indicated, it was determined that for one (R93) out of five sampled residents for medication review, the facility failed to store R93's insulin medications in a locked compartment in her room as she was under transmission-based precautions for Candida auris (C. auris). In addition, the facility failed to ensure that the [NAME] wing wound care cart was secured (locked) and accessible only to designated staff. Findings include: 1. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) fact sheet posted on their website, Candida auris is an emerging multi-drug-resistant yeast (a type of fungus). It can cause severe infections and spreads easily between . nursing home residents. (https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/pdf/threats-report/candida-auris-508.pdf) R93's clinical record revealed: 8/29/22 - R93 was care planned for C. auris colonization (bacteria existing in an area [wound] that cause local or systemic symptoms)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one (R154) out of seven residents received the correct meal as issued on their meal ticket. Findings include: Review of R154's clinical record revealed: 9/28/22 - R154 was admitted to the facility with a past medical history that included Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). 11/12/22 - A diet requisition form for R154 that was signed off by the facility read, Nutrient Content - Regular, Texture - Dysphagia Puree. 6/1/23 8:48 AM - During a random dining observation of R154's breakfast tray, the resident received a breakfast tray of regular consistency (all solids), despite his meal ticket reading, Regular - Puree texture. 6/1/23 8:50 AM - An interview with E33 (CNA) confirmed that R154 was not provided the correct tray and removed the breakfast tray. 6/1/23 9:02 AM - E33 returned with a new breakfast tray with the correct consistency of Regular-Puree for R154. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), and E3 (ADON) on 6/8/23, at approximately 2:30 PM.
- No harm found · B2024-05-01 · tag F0620 — patternNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R35) out of four residents reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to disclose and provide R35, a cognitively intact resident, with the facility's admission agreement that included, but was not limited to, addressing services, charges, consents, policies, advance directive form and resident rights. Findings include: Cross refer to F578 R35's clinical record revealed: 6/6/22 - R35 was admitted directly from another skilled nursing facility pending facility closure. Review of the R35's clinical record lacked evidence of a signed admission agreement by R35. 4/26/24 at 3:22 PM - In response to the Surveyor's request for R35's admission agreement, E6 (AD) confirmed in an interview that the admission agreement was not done when R35 was admitted on [DATE]. E6 confirmed that the admission agreement was completed today (4/26/24) with R35 as she was her own representative. 5/1/24 at 1:30 PM - Finding was reviewed during the exit conference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-05-01 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for four (R12, R169, R176, R177) out of seven residents reviewed for Hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure that all the mandatory contents of the transfer notice when a resident was transferred to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Review of R12's clinical record revealed: 1/24/14 - R12 was admitted to the facility. 12/25/23 - A progress note documented that R12 was transferred to the hospital to be evaluated after hitting her head on the windowsill. 4/29/24 2:20 PM- Review of the Notices for transfer for R12's 12/25/23 transfer revealed a lack of the required content within the notice such as: - an explanation of the right to appeal the transfer or discharge to the State; - the name, address and telephone number of the State entity that receives such appeal hearing requests; - the information on how to obtain an appeal form; - the information on obtaining assistance in completing and submitting the appeal hearing request; and - the name, address and telephone number of the representative of the Office of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined for one (R134) out of four residents reviewed for communication sensory and for one (R51) out of one residents reviewed for smoking the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate. Findings include: 1. 11/18/22- R134 had cataract surgery. 1/27/24 - An order for protective eye shield as resident allows every shift for cataract surgery was discontinued. 3/12/24-3/15/24 - R134 was hospitalized and returned then readmitted to the facility. 3/16/24 - The order was resumed for R134 to receive a protective eye shield as resident allows every shift for cataract surgery. R143 was not scheduled to receive another cataract surgery. March 2024 - Review of TAR for R134 revealed the protective eye shield was documented as given to the resident. April 2024 - Review of TAR for R134 revealed the protective eye shield was documented as given to the resident. During an interview on 4/25/24 at 11:12 AM, E17 (RN) confirmed the error and stated, The order was discontinued in January. The day of readmission they must have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her own individuality. Findings include: 5/25/23 12:15 PM - The lunch trays delivered to the [NAME] unit were observed to have plastic cutlery (knife, fork and spoon) on all of the trays. 5/31/23 12: 20 PM - The lunch trays delivered to the [NAME] unit were observed to have plastic cutlery on all of the trays. 5/31/23 12:45 PM - During an interview, E37 (Dietary Aide) stated that the plastic cutlery was on the lunch trays because the trays were late to be delivered and it was faster to get the trays out to the units by putting plastic cutlery on the trays. Findings were reviewed during the Exit Conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (RN Risk Manager) on 6/8/23 at approximately 2:30 PM.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$119,899 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $72,900 — penalty dated 2026-05-23
- $17,760 — penalty dated 2025-05-23
- $12,438 — penalty dated 2025-02-10
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-05-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NATIONWIDE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GELLEY, LEAH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2006 |
| GELLEY, MEIR | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085006. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.