Regency Healthcare & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that for one (R37) out of twelve residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to prevent abuse. For R37 sexual abuse by a staff CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified starting on 6/5/23. Due to the facility's corrective measures following the incident, this is being cited as immediate jeopardy, past non-compliance with an abatement date of 6/10/23. R37 had sustained psychosocial harm as R37 was still affected by the abuse. Findings include: A facility policy and procedure titled Identifying Types of Abuse documented . 1. As part of the abuse prevention strategy, volunteers, employees, and contractors hired by this facility are expected to be able to identify the different types of abuse that may occur against residents . 2. Abuse of any kind against residents is strictly prohibited . 3. Abuse towards a resident can occur as staff to resident abuse . 4. Sexual abuse is non-consensual conduct of any type with a resident . 5. Abuse may result in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R2) out of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide a safe environment by having two staff members present to assist with turning when R2 received a shower on 10/25/24. R2 sustained harm due to the traumatic removal of the nephrostomy tube during care and needed to be transported to the hospital for emergency treatment. On 10/26/24, R2 was again sent to the emergency room for evaluation of the injuries to his face, torso and lower extremeties. Based on review of the facility's evidence to correct the non-compliance and the facility's substantial compliance at the time of the current survey, this deficiency was determined to be past non-compliance as of 10/29/24. Findings include: R2's clinical records revealed: 2/26/16 - R2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, tracheostomy, enteral tube feeding and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (which required the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R11) out of two residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) and one (R27) out of six residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to follow the plan of care. For R11, a soiled and wet dressing was not changed per the physician's order. For R27, the facility failed to ensure re-admission orders on 6/28/25 were reviewed by on call provider and transcribed accurately. Findings include: 1. Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 6/19/25 - R11 was re-admitted to the facility and required assistance with personal care. 3/26/25 - A review of R11's quarterly MDS assessment revealed that R11 had intact cognition. 6/20/25 - R11 had a physician's order to cleanse the right wrist skin tear with NSS pat dry apply Xeroform (gauze dressing for wounds with drainage) and CDD daily and PRN (when necessary) every evening shift. 6/26/25 9:00 AM - During an observation, R11 was seen from the shower room being wheeled to the nurses' station by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R73) out of two residents reviewed for dental, the facility failed to provide the opportunity for follow up dental services. Findings include: Review of R73's clinical record revealed: 2/11/23 - R73 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia. 10/13/24 - A review of P1's (Dental) Report of Consultation documented, . Pt [R73] refused dental exam and treatment today .Recommendation: Pt would need pre-sedation prior to further treatment or dental exam. A handwritten note was also noted on the same consultation report documenting, . check oral cavity for follow up need .resident need a follow up, nursing to make apt (appointment). 11/19/24 - R73 had a physician's order to consult dental for evaluation and treatment as indicated. 11/25/24 - R73's annual MDS assessment revealed that his cognition was moderately impaired. 6/24/25 - During a telephone interview, FM1 (Family Member) stated, Dad [R73] never had any dental consults since last year. I was not notified. Last time I saw him, his teeth looked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R23, R89 and R43) residents reviewed for care plans the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans, that included measurable objectives and timeframes, to meet each residents' needs. Findings include: Cross refer to F641 and F676 1. R23's clinical record revealed: 11/8/24 - R23 was admitted to the facility. 11/9/24 7:41 AM - R23's admission evaluation documented: . 8. Preferred Language: SPANISH 9. Do you need or want an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff? YES . 11/14/24 - The admission MDS assessment, under Section A, incorrectly documented that R23's preferred language was English. From 11/8/24 through 1/7/25, R23 lacked a person-centered communication care plan as a Spanish-speaking resident. 1/8/25 - Two months after R23 was admitted to the facility, a care plan was initiated for communication problem related to language barrier with an approach that included, but was not limited to, obtaining translation services. 1/13/25 - R23 was discharged to home.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R43) out of one sampled resident, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order to administer quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel) . Findings include: Cross refer F600 Review of R43's clinical record revealed: 7/24/24 - R43 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia. 7/25/24 - R43 was care planned for receiving antipsychotic medication (to help manage his aggressive behaviors) and is at risk for behaviors and side effects. 7/30/24 - R43 was care planned for behavior as evidenced by physical aggression and interventions included to administer meds as ordered. 11/7/24 - R43 had a physician's order for quetiapine fumarate (Seroquel) 50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for bipolar disorder. 12/3/24 1:11 PM - A nurse progress noted documented, . quetiapine fumarate . med presently N/A (not available), reordered from pharmacy . 12/4/24 10:15 AM - A nurse progress note documented, . quetiapine fumarate . med not delivered from pharmacy despite being reordered. Spoke to pharmacy and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a qualified person in charge was present during all hours of operation. The presence of a certified food protection manager reduces the risk for a foodborne outbreak especially for vulnerable populations. CMS recognizes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Code and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) food safety guidance as national standards to procure, store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in long term care facilities in a safe and sanitary manner. 1/29/25 11:00 AM - Review of the kitchen staff work schedule provided by E23 (District Food Service Manager) revealed that only one staff person E22 (Food Service Manager) out of three (E22, E23 and E25) who possessed valid Food Protection Manager certificates from an Accredited Food Safety Program was scheduled to work from 12/1/24 through 12/28/24. E22 was scheduled to work seventeen days out of twenty-eight on the December 2024 kitchen staff schedule and eight days out of fourteen on the partial January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review and review of other facility documents, it was determined that for two (R42 and R43) out of eight residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that R42 was free from resident - to - resident physical abuse by R43 and R43 was free from physical abuse by R42. Findings include: A review of the facility's abuse policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, indicated, . The resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program .1. Protect residents from abuse . by anyone including , other residents; . Cross refer F600 Ex. 2., F684 and F690 1. A review of R43's clinical record revealed the following: 5/25/22 - R43 was initially admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia. 7/30/24 (revised 1/31/25) - R43's behavioral care plans included, physical aggression/abuse against others including, hitting resident on arm, throwing water on a resident and repeated episodes of aggression. R43's care plan approaches included, Administer medications as ordered, allow resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R23, R53 and R89) out of three residents reviewed for communication the facility failed to ensure eash residents' MDS assessments accurately reflected their status. Findings include: 1. Cross refer to F656 and F676 R23's clinical record revealed: 11/8/24 - R23 was admitted to the facility. 11/9/24 7:41 AM - R23's admission evaluation documented: . 8. Preferred Language: SPANISH 9. Do you need or want an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff? YES . 11/14/24 - The admission MDS assessment, under Section A, documented that R23's preferred language was English. 2/4/25 at 1:30 PM - During an interview, E14 (RNAC) reviewed the 11/14/24 admission MDS and confirmed the MDS should have indicated Spanish as the preferred language. 2. R53's clinical record revealed: 11/16/24 - R53 had an active physician's order for depakote an anticonvulsant medication every 12 hours. 11/25/24 - An acute progress note by E24 (NP) documented to continue with depakote. 11/28/24 - The quarterly MDS assessment, under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R69) out one resident reviewed for mood/behavior, the facility failed to coordinate with the PASRR program under Medicaid and refer the resident for an assessment. Findings include: 1. R69's clinical record revealed: 12/17/24 - A PASRR Level 1 Screen was completed by the hospital and documented that R69 had no mental health diagnosis known or suspected and no current mental health medications prescribed. 12/27/24 - R69 was admitted to the facility. 1/13/25 - A psychiatric evaluation documented, . past psychiatric history of depression and anxiety . review of psychotropic med (medication) regimen and management of mood/behaviors . Does endorse feelings of anxiousness intermittently . Available records prior to facility admit reviewed and appreciated. Reportedly w/ (with) lengthy psych history and diagnosis of anxiety as well as depression . noted h/o (history of) paranoia. Resident was previously treated in the past with Olanzapine [antipsychotic] . 1/13/25 - A physician's order prescribed mirtazapine medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R23) out of three residents reviewed for communication, the facility failed to provide Spanish-speaking translation/interpretation services during nursing care for R23. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure entitled Translation and/or Interpretation of Facility Services, revised November 2020, stated, This facility's language access program will ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) shall have meaningful access to information and services provided by the facility . 6. Competent oral translation of vital information that is not available in written translation . shall be provided in a timely manner . 10. It is understood that in order to provide meaningful access to services provided by this facility, translation and/or interpretation must be provided in a way that is culturally relevant and appropriate to the LEP individual . Cross refer to F641 and F656 11/8/24 - R23 was admitted to the facility. 11/9/24 at 7:41 AM - R23's admission evaluation documented: . 8. Preferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R43) out of three residents reviewed for bowel and bladder, the facility failed to evaluate R43's decline in urinary continence and failed to maintain or restore continence after R43's multiple falls related to his need for toileting assistance. Findings include: Cross refer F600 and F684 A review of R43's clinical records revealed the following: 7/24/24 - R43 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia. 7/25/24 - R43 was care planned for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) deficit related cognition with interventions including assisting R43 to attend activities of choice. In addition, R43 was set up for care and supervise/verbal dues (sic) to assure he follow thru. 7/25/24 - R43 was care planned for falls related to .poor safety awareness .with interventions including offering toileting before going to bed (8/14/24) and reminding R43 not to go to the bathroom without help (10/25/24). 7/31/24 -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$77,867 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-12-31
• $65,832 — penalty dated 2023-12-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONWIDE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DE