Excelcare At Lewes LLC
301 Ocean View Blvd, Lewes, DE 19958 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 179 certified beds · (302) 645-4664 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $106,560 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.5% | 12.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 10.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 13.6% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.5% | 21.8% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 20.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.0% | 10.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.6% | 83.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.4% | 23.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.6% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.37 | 1.81 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.16 | 1.40 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 168 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.7%CMS range 53.9–69.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 9.0–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 3.3–10.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 154.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-02-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R173) out of two residents reviewed for hydration, the facility failed to ensure that R173 maintained proper hydration which resulted in harm, requiring hospitalization on 6/1/25 and 6/19/25 with diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) and dehydration. Findings include:The BUN (blood urea nitrogen) lab test measures the amount of urea nitrogen in the blood. The BUN is directly related to the metabolic function of the liver and the excretory function of the kidney . BUN levels also may vary according to the state of hydration, with increased levels seen in dehydration and decreased levels seen in overhydration. Mosby's Diagnostic and Laboratory Test Reference 2023. Review of R173's clinical record revealed: 4/25/25 - R173 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of acute lithium toxicity, AKI (acute kidney injury), acute metabolic encephalopathy and congestive heart failure (CHF).4/28/25 - A care plan documented that R173 had potential for alteration in nutrition due to dementia and Parkinson's disease with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and review of other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R2) out of seven residents reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. R2 was found on the floor of his room, with R1 standing over him, and sent to ER for a head injury. This failure resulted in physical harm (R2) and psychosocial harm as the reasonable person would be adversely affected by being attacked in their home. Findings include:Cross refer F609 and F740.Review of R1's and R2's record revealed:7/1/25 - R2 was admitted to the facility.7/28/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility.8/12/25 - A care plan was initiated for R1 documenting socially inappropriate behavior as evidenced by verbal aggression toward staff and other residents. Interventions included ensuring safety, reminding the resident that behavior was inappropriate, and attempting to redirect with activities or preferred snacks.10/15/25 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented that R2 had a BIMS score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment and required the assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R3) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure that the provider was consulted when R3 refused dialysis services. Findings include:Review of R3's clinical record revealed:12/18/25 - R3 was admitted to the facility.12/26/25 - A physician's order documented R3 dialysis appointment Monday, Wednesday and Friday transport via stretcher. 2/9/26 11:30 AM - A progress note documented that R3 left for dialysis. 2/9/26 - A dialysis communication form documented that R3 attended dialysis but refused treatment and R3 was returned to facility without interventions. 2/12/26 1:01 PM - During an interview, E20 (LPN) stated dialysis center called the facility to notify them that R3 did not receive dialysis on 2/9/26. E20 stated she did not write a progress note documenting that R3 did not receive dialysis and stated the Nurse Manager was notified that R3 did not receive dialysis.2/12/26 1:15 PM - During an interview, E17 (UM) stated that R3 went to dialysis on 2/9/26 and was not aware R3 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R41) of one resident reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of a grievance regarding missing dentures. Findings include:5/14/25 - A facility provided grievance form completed by E14 (LPN) documented that FM1 reported R41's top dentures were missing. E14 conducted a room sweep and documented that the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift would complete a second room sweep. The concern was reported to the Director of Nursing.5/14/25 - A grievance documented that E28 (Former Social Worker) was in receipt of the grievance and reported receiving an email from the Director of Nursing requesting that E28 contact FM1. On 5/16/25 during that contact, FM1 was informed that if the resident was approved for Medicaid and no longer Medicaid-pending, Medicaid would replace the dentures. FM1 stated the resident had transferred from another facility and was already approved in Delaware. The family agreed to wait until E28 verified Medicaid status with the Business Office. A discussion with the Business Office…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R11) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review the facility failed to ensure that an ordered as needed psychotropic medication extended beyond 14 days had a documented rationale and duration. Findings include:Cross refer F756The facility policy on Psychotropic drug use last updated 5/1/25 indicated PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to fourteen days. Except if the attending physicians or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order.Review of R11's clinical record revealed:1/22/25 - R11 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. 10/15/25 - A significant change MDS assessment documented that R11 was cognitively impaired and receiving psychotropic medications. R11 exhibited physical behaviors 4 - 6 days in a seven-day period. 10/16/25 11:32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review and review of other facility documentation it was determined that for one (R174) out of three residents sampled for discharge, the facility failed to ensure a referral for home health care services was completed prior to discharge. R174 was discharged to home on 8/12/25. R174's home health services did not begin until 8/20/25 eight days after discharge from the facility. Findings include:A facility policy titled Notice Requirements before Transfer/Discharge dated 5/1/25 documented The facility will provide sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure an orderly transfer or discharge from the facility.A review of R174's clinical record revealed:7/28/25 - R174 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: aortic valve replacement, aortic regurgitation, and congestive heart failure.8/11/25 - A review of R174's discharge summary documented, Discharge summary and post-discharge plan for home health aide, home health RN/LPN, occupational and physical therapy.8/12/25 - R174 was discharged to home with a family member.9/30/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined for three (R6, R17 and R43) out of sixty-seven sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the MDS was accurate. Findings include:1.Review of R6's clinical record revealed:12/16/25 - R6 was admitted to the facility.12/20/25 - An MDS assessment documented that R6 had an infection of the foot.2/18/26 9:30 AM - During an interview, E33 (MDS Coordinator) and E34 (MDS Coordinator) confirmed that R6 was marked for an infection of the foot on the MDS assessment and stated they are coded with infection of the foot related to a fungal infection documented by the podiatrist. 2. Review of R17's clinical record revealed:1/8/26 - R17 was admitted to the facility.1/15/26 - An MDS assessment documented that R17 had an infection of the foot.2/18/26 9:30 AM - During an interview, E33 (MDS Coordinator) and E34 (MDS Coordinator) confirmed that R17 was marked for an infection of the foot on the MDS assessment and stated they are coded with infection of the foot related to a fungal infection documented by the podiatrist. 3. Review of R143's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for four (R2, R9, R22, R41 and R46) out of forty-nine sampled residents the facility failed to revise the residents care plans to reflect their individualized needs. Additionally, it was determined that for R2 the facility failed to ensure that the resident and the resident representative were involved in developing the care plan. Findings include:1. Review of R2's clinical record revealed: 11/15/24 – R2 was admitted to the facility. 11/4/25 – A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation documented R2 with a score of 15 out of 15, showing an intact cognitive status. 2/9/26 9:27 AM – During an interview, R2 stated that he did not recall having quarterly care plan meetings since his admission. 2/10/26 – A review of R2's electronic chart documented a care conference meeting on 11/29/24, where R2 was present and no further meetings afterwards. Furthermore, the electronic chart for R2 documented a care plan completed on 3/10/25, 5/21/25 and 12/2/25. 2/16/26 8:50 AM – During an interview, E15 (SW) confirmed that R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that for one (R131) out of one resident reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living), the facility failed to provide ADL care for dependent residents. Findings include Review of R131's clinical record revealed:3/12/25 - R131 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of stroke infarction, affecting the right side.12/3/25 - A quarterly MDS assessment documented that R131 was dependent on staff for bathing and dressing.12/15/25 - A review of R131's care plan for ADL's documented that the resident is dependent for ADL care. The care plan did not include a refusal of nail care. 2/9/26 9:00 AM - An observation revealed that R131's left and right hands had long fingernails, and there was black debris under the fingernails of his right hand.2/10/26 10:00 AM - An observation revealed that R131's left and right hands had long fingernails, and there was black debris under the fingernails of his right hand. 2/11/26 12:51 PM - During an interview, E10 (CNA) stated that when she gives a bath, she washes the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review for one (R56) out of two residents reviewed for catheter use, the facility failed to refer R56 to urology timely while having an ongoing urinary catheter issue. Findings include: Review of R56's clinical record revealed:10/24/23 - R56 was admitted to the facility.11/6/23 - A care plan documented R56 had a foley catheter related to neurogenic bladder with the following interventions: resident had a 18F with a 30 mL balloon, position catheter bag and tubing below level of the bladder; monitor intake and output per facility policy; monitor for signs and symptoms of discomfort on urination and frequency; monitor for signs and symptoms of UTI and report to physician; monitor and document for pain or discomfort related to catheter. 2/25/25 - A progress note documented R56 returned from an appointment and foley catheter was found to be out, with balloon intact. The progress note documented that foley catheter insertion was attempted and unsuccessful at this time, due to resistance. The provider was notified and recommendation to leave foley catheter out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that for one (R183) out one resident sampled for respiratory care, the facility failed to provide professional standards of practice. Findings include:A review of R183's clinical record revealed:1/31/26 - R183 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure.2/7/26 - An initial MDS documented that R183 was moderately impaired BIMS 11.2/10/26 - A physician's order for R183 documented place nebulizer face mask after each use in a plastic bag.2/15/26 - A review of the treatment administration record lacked evidence of an order directing that the mask and tubing be stored in a protective plastic bag when not in use.2/9/26 at 11:35 AM - An observation revealed that R183's oxygen tubing was on the floor, and not in a protective plastic bag. The nebulizer face mask was on the bedside table and not in a protective plastic bag.2/10/26 at 9:00 AM - An observation revealed that R183's oxygen tubing was on the floor and not in a protective plastic bag. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R141) out of one resident reviewed for pain, the facility failed to provide pain management according to professional standards of practice Findings include:Review of R141's clinical record revealed:[DATE] - R141 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of spondylopathy cervical region and muscle weaknessXXX[DATE] - A quarterly MDS assessment documented that R141was alert and oriented. Additionally, the MDS documented that R141 had painXXX[DATE] - A baseline care plan was initiated for potential for pain and actual for spinal stenosis of the cervical region, mobility impairment, spondylopathy, and chronic pain syndromeXXX[DATE] - A progress note revealed R141 had a surgical cervical fusionXXX[DATE] - A physician's order for oxycodone 5 mg, take 2 tablets by mouth as needed for pain for 14 days. The order was discontinued [DATE]XXX[DATE] - A physician's order was reissued for Oxycodone 2 tablets 5mg by mouth for chronic pain as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that for one (R3) out of one sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to monitor R3's dialysis catheter and failed to complete R3's before (pre) and after (post) dialysis assessments. Findings include: Review of R3's clinical record revealed:12/18/25 - R3 was admitted to the facility.12/19/25 - A care plan documented R3 needs dialysis related to renal failure with the following interventions: encourage resident to go for scheduled dialysis appointments; monitor/document/report any sign and symptoms of infection to the access site: redness, swelling, warmth or drainage; monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of renal insufficiency: change in level of consciousness, changes in skin turgor, change in heart or lung sounds; monitor/document/report signs and symptoms of the following: bleeding, hemorrhage, bacteremia or septic shock.12/25/25 - An admission MDS documented that R3 was receiving hemodialysis and dependent for ADL's. 12/26/25 - A physician's order documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for three (R11, R14 and R15) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review, the facility failed to ensure for the medication regimen review (MRR) that irregularities identified were reviewed by the attending/designee. Findings include:A facility policy titled, Pharmacy Services – Drug Regimen Review, dated 5/1/25, documented, . the pharmacist will report any irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's medical director and the director of nursing . The attending physician must document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it . 1. Review of R15's clinical record revealed: 8/26/25 – R15 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, hypothyroidism. 12/8/25 – A medication regimen review for R15 documented that charting omissions are noted for levothyroxine for 11/21/25. A nursing comment documented, Omitted? Not sure why, and was signed by E27 (UM). There was a lack of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R11) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication review the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of R11's clinical record revealed: 9/23/25 - A physician's order was written for R11 to receive Metoprolol, a blood pressure medication one time a day for hypertension, hold for systolic blood pressure greater than 130 or heart rate less than sixty. October 2025 - Review of R11's MAR revealed that nineteen out of thirty-one doses of Metoprolol were not given to R11 because of lower systolic blood pressure or heart rate. November 2025 - Review of R11's MAR revealed that twenty-five out of thirty doses of Metoprolol were not given to R11 because of lower systolic blood pressure or heart rate. December 2025 - Review of R11's MAR revealed that eleven out of thirty-one doses of Metoprolol were not given to R11 because of lower systolic blood pressure or heart rate. January 2026 - Review of R11's MAR revealed that nine out of thirty-one doses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and review of physician orders it was determined that for one (R11) out of six residents' sampled for unnecessary medication review the facility failed to ensure that R11's blood pressure medication was held when vital signs were below ordered parameters. Findings include:The facility policy on medication administration last updated 5/1/25 indicated, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices.Review of R11's clinical record revealed:9/22/25 - A physicians' order was written for R11 to receive metoprolol daily for blood pressure; hold for systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 130 or hear rate (HR) less than 60. October 2025 - R11 was administered metoprolol with below ordered parameters on the following dates:10/7 with a SBP of 11810/28 with a SBP of 125. November 2025 - R11 was administered metoprolol with below ordered parameters on the following dates:11/24 with a HR of 52.12/7/25 - An MRR irregularity report documented, metoprolol is not always held as required by the physician's order.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R41) of one resident reviewed for grievance, the facility failed to promptly to initiate the replacement of lost dentures within three days after notification of loss.Findings include:5/14/25 - A facility-provided grievance form documented that FM1 reported R41's top dentures were missing. E14 (LPN) completed a room sweep and documented that the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift would complete a second room sweep. The concern was reported to the Director of Nursing. The grievance included a note that a meeting with the Business Office to explore Medicaid eligibility for denture replacement.2/18/26 at 1:45 PM - During an interview, E15 stated she was unable to explain the extended timeframe for replacement of the dentures and was unsure why a meeting with the Business Office was required prior to proceeding with replacement. E15 further stated the events that occurred while she was on leave from the facility.2/18/26 at 1:53 PM - During a joint interview with E12 (Current Business Office Manager) and E15 (Social Worker), E12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R2 and R56) out of 2 sampled residents for dental services, the facility failed to assist the resident in obtaining routine dental services. Findings include:A facility policy and procedure titled, Dental Services, dated 5/1/25, documented, It is the policy of the facility to accommodate needed dental services, including routine dental services; to ensure the facility provides the assistance needed or requested to obtain these services. The facility will, if necessary or if requested, assist the resident: a. Making appointments . 1. Review of R2's clinical record revealed: 11/15/24 – R2 was admitted to the facility. 11/25/24 – A care plan was initiated for R2 with broken/carious teeth, including interventions to coordinate dental care and transportation as needed. 11/4/25 – The annual MDS assessment documented that R2 was cognitively intact and had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. 2/9/26 9:28 AM – During an observation and interview, R2 stated that they have had broken teeth and has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. 02/09/2026 9:14 AM Sussex Hall nutrition refrigerator contained three (3) opened cartons of thickened water that were incorrectly dated to reflect the date of disposal as per manufacture recommendations. One container was dated February 3, 2026 and the other two cartons were dated January 31, 2026. The manufacturer's instructions on the cartons state that once opend, any remaining product should be discarded after four (4) days. 02/09/2026 10:08 AM Henelopen Hall Nutrition Refrigerator contained 1 carton of Thickened water that wereincorrectly dated
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to the ensure the Medical Director fulfilled his/her responsibility of ensuring implementation of the Drug Regimen Review policy to be consist with current professional standards of care regarding provider documentation in response to identified irregularities. Findings include: Cross refer F756The facility job description for responsibilities of the medical director indicated, Provider Supervision and &Consultation: Provide guidance and education to physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants regarding best practices in long-term care. Policy Development & Implementation: Ensure compliance with federal, state, and local healthcare regulations, including CMS and CDC guidelines.The facility policy on Drug Regimen Review last updated 5/1/25 indicated, The attending physician must document in the residents medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed and what, if any action has been taken to address it.2/18/26 8:52 AM - During an interview E2 (ROD) confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure accuracy of resident records for one (R41) out of six residents reviewed for falls when R41's fall incident report contained inaccurate information regarding an injury. Findings include:Review of R41's clinical record revealed; 12/15/25 1:09 PM - A progress note in R41's clinical record documented, At 1235, while this writer was at the meds cart giving out afternoon med, heard a bomb sound behind in the dining area, immediately turned and saw patient lying face down on the floor. Immediately assessed patient and a hematoma noted on patient forehead . 12/15/25 - The incident report for R41's fall documented, No injuries observed at time of incident in the injuries observed at time of incident section. 2/18/26 12:03 PM - During an interview E40 (R--) confirmed the finding and stated, they did write it in the other section. 2/18/26 3:40 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (ROD), and E3 (DON).
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R1 and R6) out of seven residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report resident to resident abuse to the State Agency within two hours. Findings include:1.Review of R1's clinical record revealed:7/28/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility.11/4/25 - A review of facility reported incident documented that R1 experienced a psychotic episode and made contact with three residents (R3, R4, and R5) which occurred on 11/3/25 at 9:00 PM. The incident report documented that the report was submitted to the state agency on 11/4/25 at 2:39 PM.11/7/25 9:30 AM - During an interview, E6 (CNA) confirmed the incident occurred on 11/3/25 at approximately 9:00 PM.11/13/25 12:10 PM - During an interview, E3 (ADON) confirmed that she was made aware an incident occurred on 11/3/25 around approximately 9:00 PM and stated that when obtaining staff interviews on 11/4/25 was then informed of R1 having resident to resident physical contact with other residents. E3 stated the report was submitted late due to facility wanting to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R2) out of seven (7) residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record contained accurate documentation. Findings include:Review of R2's clinical record:7/1/25 - R2 was admitted to the facility.11/7/25 - A review of R1's clinical record lacked evidence of a progress note, consult, medication review, or visit summary after the incident on 11/2/25. 11/13/25 1:25 PM - The facility provided electronic communication from E16 (NP) documenting R2 was seen on 11/6/25 for a wellness check. 11/14/25 9:16 AM - During an interview, E12 (LPN) stated that R2 had not been seen by psychiatrist on 11/6/25 and confirmed no progress notes were not in the electronic medical record for the aforementioned date. The facility failed to ensure the clinical record contained accurate documentation. 11/14/25 - Findings were reviewed with E1 (Corporate NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON) during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one residents (Resident (R)79) in the sample of 46 received care and services in a manner and environment that maintained dignified dining experience. Findings include: Review of R79's admission Record located under the Profile tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R79 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized osteoarthritis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/04/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R79 was cognitively intact. Review of the Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab dated 11/13/24 revealed R79 was to have assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) as needed due to identified self-care deficit. Observation and interview on 02/11/25 at 08:38 AM, R79 was seated in his wheelchair at the foot of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 21) reviewed for abuse was free from abuse in the sample of 46 residents. This failure had the potential for psychosocial impairment from being verbally abused by a staff member. Findings include: A review of the facility reported incident revealed that on 11/26/24 at approximately 9:00 AM, the Social worker witnessed the involved staff (medical records clerk) having a verbal exchange with the resident in an argumentative tone and when the involved staff was advised to walk away from the altercation, the staff member turned around and confronted the R21 and used profanity. Review of R21's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/26/24 revealed an admission date of 05/17/17 and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 15 out of 15 indicating R21 was cognitively intact. On 02/13/25 at 12:10 PM during an interview R21 stated that he had already talked with someone from the state about this incident. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation for one of one resident (Resident (R) 177) reviewed for misappropriation. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 took Resident (R)177's Percocet (pain medication) from the medication cart. The facility's failure to safeguard medication placed all residents at risk for their medications to be misappropriated. Findings include: Review of the facility's investigation summary revealed, On 12/4/24, [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)5's name] received 2 blister packs of Percocet packs from the pharmacy around 5AM. [LPN5] then handed the 2 packs of Percocet off to [Registered Nurse (RN)5's name] who was responsible for two carts on the unit (referred to as the odd and even carts). Both cards were mistakenly placed on the even cart, causing a discrepancy, the even cart had three cards of Percocet and the odd cart had two cards of Percocet. An adjustment was made and both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for the reporting of abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 77) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 46 residents. These failures had the potential to contribute to continued abuse in the facility for this resident and other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Reporting of Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime & Alleged Violations provided by the facility and dated 06/15/24 indicated, The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for .reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property .Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment .are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation into an allegation of staff to resident abuse for one of five residents (Resident (R) 77) reviewed for an allegation of abuse out of a total sample of 46 residents. The failure to conduct a thorough investigation had the potential to place other residents at risk for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Reporting of Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime & Alleged Violations revised 06/15/24 revealed, .In response to allegations of abuse .or mistreatment, the facility will: a. Have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated .c. Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law .The administrator, Director of Nursing (DON) or Designee will be responsible for obtaining all statements/forms from staff member and will also be responsible for the investigation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment to a wound in accordance with the physician's order and revise the care plan to reflect the change of wound treatment for one of six residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident (R) 17) in the sample of 46 residents. The failure created the potential to cause a negative outcome to the healing of R17's wound. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located in R17's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acquired absence of right and left legs above the knees, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/20/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) R46) of two residents reviewed for pressure sores in the sample of 46 residents was provided with all planned interventions related to an existing pressure sore. This failure created the potential for the resident to experience further unnecessary skin breakdown. Findings include: Review of R46's undated admission Record dated 02/13/25 in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Summary tab indicated admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and type 2 diabetes. Review of R46's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/13/24 in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment indicated the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers but did not have any current pressure ulcers at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent an injury during incontinence care for two of eight residents (Resident (R) 171 and R170) reviewed for accidents out of a total sample of 46 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to utilize a mechanical lift for assistance out of bed for R170 and failed to properly assist R171 with bed mobility during incontinence care which according to the care plan required the assistance of two staff members. This failure resultedR171 sustaining a laceration to her forehead when she rolled off the bed during incontinence care. Additionally, R170 sustained a skin tear to the abdomen during incontinence care related to improper transfer. Findings include: 1. Review of R171's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction. Review of R171's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab initiated 09/01/20 included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R) R28 and R65) out of three residents reviewed for urinary function/catheters had appropriate orders in place related to the use of their indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 46 residents. This failure created the potential for the residents to go without appropriate catheter related care. Findings include: Review of R65's admission Record, dated 02/13/25 in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Admissions tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included quadriplegia following a spinal cord injury and urinary retention. Review of R65's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/05/24 and in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter in place in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) R65) out of seven residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 46 resident was appropriate for the use of side rails on his bed. This failure created the potential for the resident to be injured related to potentially unnecessary side rails installed and in use on his beds. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Rails/Grab Rails dated 05/03/24 indicated, The facility will attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail .The use of side rails will require a physicians order; .The use of bed rails will be included in the residents' plan of care .The nursing department will evaluate the resident for the use of bed/side rails upon admission, readmission, quarterly and as needed. Review of R65's admission Record, dated 02/13/25 and found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Admissions tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident (R) 176) whose medications were reviewed was free from significant medication error in the sample of 46 residents. Specifically, R176 was administered Ativan, an anxiolytic medication, and morphine, a narcotic pain medication, without a physician order for the medications. This medication error had the potential to cause the resident to become over sedated and experience respiratory depression. Findings include: Review of the summary provided by the facility revealed on 07/26/24 at approximately 9:35 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)4 started the medication pass for the hall she was assigned to on the evening shift. She took out medications for a hospice resident including 0.5 milligrams (mg) of Ativan and 15 mg of Morphine and proceeded to the room. RN4 did not check R176's armband or ask her name before administering the medications. After R176 swallowed the medication she realized she had given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used for one resident of one resident (Resident (R) 320) who was on contact isolation, and failed to identify COVID from the weekend to weekday for R80 who was not placed on contact isolation in a timely manner to prevent the potential spread of an infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Feeding Medication Administration dated 05/01/24 and provided by the facility stated, .Universal precautions and clean technique will be utilized when stopping, starting, flushing, and giving medications through the feeding tube. PPE [personal protective equipment] will be used as needed .The personal protective equipment worn will vary by task being performed and likelihood of exposure to body fluid .Enhanced Barrier Precautions will be used in the facility as extra level of protection for some residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-20 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
5. Review of R5's clinical record revealed: 12/29/15 - R5 was admitted to the facility. 11/14/17 - A PASARR 1.5 was completed for R5 with an outcome stating The individual does not have a serious mental illness (SMI) but further review of level of impairment, recent treatment history, or other circumstances demonstrates that a full II is not required . 1/18/22 - A new diagnoses of schizophrenia, anxiety disorder unspecified, and major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate were identified. 10/24/22 - A new diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance was identified. 12/16/22 - A new diagnosis of bipolar disorder, unspecified, was identified. 1/25/23 - A new diagnosis of unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or know physiological condition was identified. 3/14/24 12:40 PM - In a telephone interview, S1 (PASARR State Authority) confirmed there should have been a resident review in 2022 as the PASARR 1.5 from 2017 is not a true reflection of R5's current clinical status. 3/15/24 11:41 AM - In an interview, E6 (SW) a second level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for one room out of five rooms reviewed for environmental concerns the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. Findings include: Random observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed: 3/11/24 10:37 AM - An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the following: -A substantial amount of dirt and food crumbs scattered throughout the bedroom. -The bathroom revealed a substantial amount of small, circular black debris scattered throughout the floor. Also, next to the toilet had a circular area, brown in color approximately 12 inches by 6 inches in size. -There was approximately 3 feet of baseboard peeling off the wall and onto the floor. During this observation, an interview with the resident stated that (baseboard) has been that way for a year. The resident stated he told maintenance about it. 3/12/24 10:58 AM - An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that there continued to be dirt and food crumbs scattered throughout the bedroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R255) out of three residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report a bruise of unknown origin. Findings include: 9/26/23 - An admission MDS assessment documented R255 had a BIMS score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment). 10/10/23 6:20 AM - A skin and wound note documented, resident noted with left upper arm bruise of unknown origin while care was being provided. 10/10/23 - A facility incident report documented that R255 had a bruise to the left upper arm. No measurements or description was documented in R255's clinical record. R255 was unable to explain what happened. 10/11/23 12:10 AM - An order note documented, monitor left upper arm bruise until resolved every shift. 10/12/24 2:07 AM - An order note documented, monitor right upper arm and chest bruise until resolved every shift for monitoring. The facility lacked evidence that a bruise of unknown origin was reported to the state agency within the required eight-hour time frame. 3/20/24 12:34 PM - During an interview, E2 (DON) confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of the clinical record, it was determined that for one (R309) out of two residents reviewed for admission, the facility failed to ensure that R309 had physician orders for the resident's immediate care. Findings include: 1 a. Review of R309's clinical record revealed: 3/6/24 - R309 was admitted to the facility. 3/6/24 6:30 PM - An admission assessment was completed for R309 indicating an indwelling urinary catheter in place. 3/6/24 - A care plan was initiated for indwelling urinary catheter. 3/9/24 - An admission MDS indicated R309 had an indwelling urinary catheter. 3/11/24 11:02 AM - An observation of R309 revealed an indwelling catheter in place and bag in a privacy bag. An interview with R309 confirmed use of indwelling urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder (retention of urine). 3/12/24 9:32 AM - A physician's order revealed R309 use of indwelling urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder. 3/13/24 2:22 PM - An interview with E19 (CNA) confirmed R309 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined that for one (R313) out of one residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence care, the facility failed to ensure that R313 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician orders. Findings include: 1. Review of R313's clinical record revealed: 6/19/23 - The EMR diagnosis page documented that R313 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of chronic idiopathic constipation. 6/19/23 Review of the physician's orders included medications for constipation: - Milk of magnesia (MOM)- give 30 ml by mouth every 24 hours as needed for constipation If no BM x 9 shifts. -Bisacodyl suppository- insert 1 suppository rectally every 24 hours as needed for constipation. Administer if MOM is ineffective or NO bowel movement x 10 shifts. -Bisacodyl oral tablets- give 10 mg by mouth every 24 hours as needed for Constipation. -Senna s tablets- give 2 tablets by mouth in the evening every other day for constipation. -Miralax powder- give 17 grams by mouth one time a day every other day for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined for one (R309) out of one resident reviewed for physician visits, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the total program of care, including medications and treatments. Findings include: Review of R309 clinical record revealed: 3/6/24 - R309 was admitted to the facility. 3/6/24 6:30 PM - An admission assessment was completed for R309 indicating an indwelling urinary catheter was in place. 3/9/24 - An admission MDS indicated R309 had an indwelling urinary catheter. 3/9/24 0:00 AM - A physician's progress note revealed a history and physical completed for R309. The progress note assessed the genitourinary system and lacked evidence of an indwelling urinary catheter in place. 3/11/24 11:02 AM - An observation of R309 revealed an indwelling catheter in place and a bag in a privacy bag. An interview, R309 confirmed use of an indwelling urinary catheter related to neurogenic bladder (retention of urine). 3/12/24 9:32 AM - A physician's order revealed R309's use of an indwelling urinary catheter related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a qualified person in charge was present in the kitchen during all hours of food service operation. Findings include: 3/11/24 10:24 AM - During interview, E27 (Dietary Aide), disclosed that only one (1) staff member in the food service department possessed a valid Food Protection Manager certificate from an Accredited Food Safety Program. 3/20/24 2:40 PM - Findings reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON) and E3 (ADON) and E4 (Corporate) during the exit conference.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that for one (R14) out of one residents reviewed for food the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet the individuals needs. Findings include: Review of R14's clinical record revealed: 6/19/18 - R14 was admitted to the facility. 2/28/24 - A physician's order stated that R14 was on a regular diet with ground meats/mechanical soft texture, regular/thin consistency liquids. (mechanical soft texture are foods that are moist, soft texture, and easily swallowed. Meats are ground or finely cut to equal size no bigger than 1/4 inch). 3/8/24 - A swallow study completed by an outside provider revealed R14 required ground solids and regular liquids. 3/11/24 approximately 12:30 PM - An observation of lunch with R14 revealed whole cauliflower florets. R14's meal ticket stated, 1/2 cup - Ground Parslied Cauliflower. R14 attempted to eat the cauliflower and spit out the stem and stated, I can't eat this, it's too hard. R14 does not use his dentures and has no other natural teeth. 3/11/24 1:10 PM - During an interview, E16 (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a manner that prevents food borne illness to the residents. Findings include: 3/11/24 10:34 AM - During the initial tour of the kitchen, there was a partially uncovered container of stuffed peppers in the walk-in refrigerator with the plastic cling film peeled back exposing the food to dirt, debris, and other contaminants. 3/11/24 10:38 AM - During a tour of the kitchen, the reach-in refrigerator contained a plate of unlabeled undated liverwurst. 3/11/24 11:07 AM - An observation of the nourishment refrigerator in the Henlopen hallway revealed a carton of Nutritional Shake that was undated. The instructions on the carton indicate that once opened, any remaining product should be discarded after four (4) days. 3/11/24 11:55 AM - During a tour of the kitchen, the surveyor observed E27 (Dietary Aide) test the sanitizer level of the solution in two red sanitizing buckets. When E27 tested the sanitizing solution, the test strips from each of the two buckets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a random observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two call bells (room [ROOM NUMBER]) in the facility was functioning properly. Findings include: 3/11/24 approximately 10:15 AM - During a random observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] the call bell box on the wall was taken apart and the wires were exposed. Both A and B bed call bells were unable to be plugged in thus were not functioning. Further observation revealed there wasn't any alternate equipment for the residents to call for help. 3/11/24 10:25 AM - During an interview E7 RN confirmed the call bell box was taken apart, the wires were exposed therefore the call bells were unable to be plugged in and there wasn't a bell or any kind of alternate means for the two residents to call for help. E7 was then asked if she knew how long the call bells were not functional? E7 stated she thought last week but wasn't sure. 3/11/24 10:42 AM - During an interview E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) were asked if they were aware that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-02-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment when the facility repeatedly utilized an overhead paging system to communicate with other staff. Findings include:During random observations overhead paging for non-emergent communication was heard the following times: 2/12/26 10:45 AM.2/12/26 10:47 AM.2/12/26 11:01 AM.2/13/26 11:58 AM.2/13/26 1:12 PM.2/16/26 1:24 PM.2/16/26 1:59 PM.2/16/26 2:59 PM.2/13/26 9:58 AM - During the facility resident council meeting an anonymous resident confirmed the overhead paging by facility staff was unpleasant. 2/17/26 3:21 PM - During an interview E1 (NHA) confirmed the facility utilized overhead paging to communicate with other staff members. E1 stated We use it during the day, but we stop at 7:00 PM. 2/18/26 3:40 PM - Findings were reviewed during the exit conference with E1 (NHA), E2 (ROD), and E3 (DON).
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$106,560 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $87,640 — penalty dated 2026-02-18
- $18,920 — penalty dated 2025-11-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EXCELCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXCELCARE AT LEWES HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2024 |
| INDIGO DE 3 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 60% | since 10/01/2024 |
| FRANKEL, ELIYAHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 40% | since 10/01/2024 |
| OXFORD FINANCE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| BURTON, TONYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| ZUPNICK, JOEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| JM AND MAZEL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MARTIN FRIEDMAN CPA PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| MAZEL FAMILY TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| REVACH LLC DE-NJ | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| BERKOWITZ, CHESKEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| LEIFER, JOEL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| LEVY, SUSAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
| SHIELDS, KRISTEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/20/2025 |
| VASQUEZ, JENNIFER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085034. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.