No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Excel Care At The Pines

29 North Vermont Ave, Atlantic City, NJ 08401 · For profit - Individual · 151 certified beds · (609) 344-8900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (609) 344-8900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Apr 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1301 Atlantic Ave · (609) 572-0000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
1101 Atlantic Ave · (609) 344-2700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
404 Oriental Ave · (609) 449-8321 · Call to confirm hours
Park
N Massachusetts Ave · (609) 344-8809 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
201-205 Atlantic Ave · (609) 345-2730

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.0%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%4.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.6%12.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%2.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.5%18.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%15.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%12.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.0%80.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.292.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.171.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.5%CMS range 29.1–55.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.4–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge66.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.4–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-06)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of facility policy, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to a.) complete reference checks on employees before their start date and b.) complete criminal background checks prior to their start date of employment. This deficient practice was identified for 12 of 50 employee files reviewed (Employee #2, #3, #5, #6, #9, #31, #42, #45 and #50), and was evidenced by the following:A review of the facility's Employee Health Screening, Background Checks, and License Verification policy dated 5/1/2025 included, The facility shall ensure that all employees, contractors, and licensed practitioners are qualified, competent, and medically fit for duty, and do not pose a risk to residents, in compliance with Federal and New Jersey regulations. No employees shall begin work without completion of required pre-employment screening, background checks, health clearance, and license verification (if applicable).Prior to hire, the facility shall complete: Criminal background check in accordance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) was dedicated solely to the infection prevention and control program (IPCP). This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of one (1) staff and was evidenced by the following:On 4/1/2026 at 10:46 AM, the surveyor interviewed the interim Director of Nursing (DON) who stated that she was hired at the facility as a part-time, 20 hours per week, Infection Preventionist (IP). However, since the former DON resigned she has been acting as both the full-time DON and part-time IP in the facility. The DON further explained that she was doing both the IP and DON positions with the help of the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (VPCS). On 4/2/2026 at 8:46 AM, the surveyor interviewed the interim DON/IP who stated that she had taken on the role as both the interim DON and part-time IP as of 2/11/26. She stated that she was originally hired for an IP position but the administration asked her to cover both positions until they had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement, revise and update care plans (CP) for 3 of 28 residents (Resident #7, #8, #17) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:1.) On 4/01/2026 at 1:01 PM, the surveyor interviewed Resident #17 who stated that he/she had wounds on the left foot and had a single lumen peripherally inserted central line (PICC) (a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a peripheral vein (usually in the upper arm) and threaded into a large vein near the heart) in the left upper arm. The surveyor reviewed Resident #17's electronic medical record which revealed the following information: A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but was not limited to osteomyelitis (serious, often painful infection and inflammation of the bone caused by bacteria or fungi) and diabetes mellitus (DM). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a assessment tool that facilitates a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's refusal of an anticoagulant (a medication that reduces the risk of blood clot formation) was promptly communicated to the resident's physician and documented within the progress notes of the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice.This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for the use of an anticoagulant and was evidenced by the following:Refer to F656 and F756Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care and services for the provision of dressing changes to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-is a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a peripheral vein (usually in the upper arm) and threaded to a large vein near the heart) site consistent with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #17) reviewed for parenteral medication administration and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #17 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to osteomyelitis (serious, often painful infection and inflammation of the bone caused by bacteria or fungi) and diabetes mellitus (DM). A review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a assessment tool that facilitates a resident's care, dated 1/20/2026, indicated that the resident scored 12 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to report irregularities found in the medical record to the facility. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #7) reviewed for anticoagulant (a medication that reduces the risk of blood clot formation) usage and was evidenced by the following:On 3/30/2026 at 11:46 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #7 lying in bed awake. The resident indicated that he/she received an anticoagulant via injection and had no complaints about bleeding or bruising.On 3/31/26 at 10:29 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident #7. A review of the admission Record, (an admission summary) revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to; multiple fractures of pelvis (the large bony structure near the base of the spine to which the legs are attached) with stable disruption of the pelvic ring, initial encounter for closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the required members were present during the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee Meetings. This deficient practice occurred during 4 of 4 meetings reviewed and was evidenced by the following:On 4/6/2026 at 9:57 AM, the surveyor was provided with the last four quarters of the QAPI meeting sign-in sheets for review that were dated July 31, 2025, April 2025 (date not specified), October 2025 (date not specified), and 1/29/2026 and reviewed them with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator. The LNHA stated that it was mandatory for the Medical Director (MD), LNHA, Director of Nursing (DON), and the Infection Preventionist (IP) to attend the QAPI meetings because they were core in-house staff and their signature on the sign-in sheet was essential to validate that they were in attendance at the quarterly meetings. The LNHA reviewed the QAPI Meeting Sign-In Sheet dated April 2025 and confirmed that the DON had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and home like environment for one resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on 1 of 4 nursing units (Veteran's Unit). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 3/31/2026 at 12:39 PM, the surveyor entered room [ROOM NUMBER] with an unsampled resident's permission and noted that one of the square shaped ceramic tile flooring pieces had been removed from the subflooring and was placed over the top of the opening from which it was previously adhered to, and the surveyor noted a shallow opening in the flooring at the foot of bed C which was not occupied at that time. When interviewed the unsampled resident stated that one of the other two residents who also resided in the room had previously reported the broken floor tile to a staff member, but he/she did not know which staff member that they reported it to. The surveyor also noted that the flooring around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #2632496 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide incontinence care to residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) for 2 out of 8 residents (Resident #1 and #36) observed during an incontinence tour.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 4/2/2026 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor conducted an incontinence tour with Licensed Practical Nurse/Nursing Supervisor (LPN/NS) #1 on the third floor. Resident #36 was observed lying in bed. When Resident #36 was asked if their incontinence brief was clean and dry, they stated that it was wet and they needed to be changed. They added that they had been wet since 5 AM. They further stated that at 5 AM that morning, they asked their assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to change them, but the CNA left the room and never returned to change them.At that time, with the resident's permission, LPN/NS #1 checked the resident's brief. The outer layer was noted with a blue line, which indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an air mattress was accurately set according to the resident's weight. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: On 3/31/2026 at 12:36 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #1 in bed on an air mattress set at 200 pounds.The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #1.A review of the admission Record (an admission summary), revealed the resident had diagnoses which included: Dependence on ventilator, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and anxiety.A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 3/12/2026, revealed that Resident #1 was absent of spoken words, and their hearing and vision was highly impaired The MDS further revealed that the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers and required a pressure reducing device for their bed and the resident was totally dependent on staff.A review of the individual comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 18 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 16) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record (admission summary) indicated that Resident #16 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but was not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute respiratory distress syndrome. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment that facilitates a resident's care, dated 1/26/26, indicated that Resident #16 scored 14 out of 15 on the Basic Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated that Resident #16 was independent with all aspect of activities of daily living (ADLs). On 3/30/2026 at 11:29 AM, during initial tour, the surveyor was unable to observe Resident #16 in their room. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that the resident was on continuous oxygen (O2). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure all residents reached their highest practical wellbeing by failing to: a) provide timely incontinence care to 2 out of 8 residents (Resident #1 and #36) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, and b) provide sufficient nursing staff for 4 of 4 weeks of staffing prior to the recertification survey date of 4/6/2026 . This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 4/2/2026 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor conducted an incontinence tour with Licensed Practical Nurse/Nursing Supervisor (LPN/NS) #1 on the third floor. Resident #36 was observed lying in bed. When Resident #36 was asked if their incontinence brief was clean and dry, they stated that it was wet and they needed to be changed. They added that they had been wet since 5 AM. They further stated that at 5 AM that morning, they asked their assigned Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to change them, but the CNA left the room and never returned to change them.At that time,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the daily Nursing Home Resident Care Staffing Report was posted and displayed in the front lobby. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 1 main entrance and was evidenced by the following: On 4/6/2026 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed the facility's Nursing Home Staffing Report Form dated 4/2/2026, posted on the receptionist's desk in the front main lobby. On 4/6/2026 at 10:20AM, the surveyor interviewed the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) who stated that he posts the schedule out front so that visitors and patients know what the staffing is like. He added that on Fridays, he preprints the staffing reports for Saturdays and Sundays and places them in the stand behind Friday's report. He further stated that the supervisor was responsible for posting the staffing report in his absence and adjusting it, if there were any call outs. He acknowledged that the daily staffing should be accurate and posted daily. A review of the facility's Staffing policy, dated 5/1/2025, failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1.) a resident received a Renal-Regular Double Portions diet for a lunch meal in accordance with physician orders, and 2.) a resident received a Regular Diet with small portion starches, double portions of entree and vegetable; provide extra sandwich with lunch and dinner in accordance with physician orders. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #7, #18). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) On 3/30/2026 at 10:29 AM, during the initial tour, the surveyor observed Resident #18 lying in bed. Resident #18 had oxygen in place and stated to the surveyor that he/she did not feel well and stated, sick. On 3/31/2026 at 10:53 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #18. A review of the admission Record revealed that Resident #18 was admitted to the facility with the following but not limited to diagnoses: Anemia, acute respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint #NJ184191/394091 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to document treatments administered to a resident on the electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for professional standards of nursing practice (Resident #2). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist.According to the facility admission Record, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included: atherosclerotic heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/12/2024 at 09:32 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. On a lower shelf a one (1) gallon container of Deli Mustard was dated received 11/21/22. The mustard had a manufacturer's BEST BY date of 10/25/23. On interview the FSD agreed that the mustard was expired and should have been removed from stock. The FSD then removed the mustard from storage. 2. On a lower shelf in the walk-in freezer two (2) bags of frozen French fries were removed from their original container. The French fries had no dates. The FSD told the surveyor that all products should be dated when removed from the original container. In addition, an apple pie on a middle shelf was removed from its original container and had no dates. 3. On a middle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY C/O # NJ 168401, NJ# 174304 Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean and homelike environment. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 units, 2nd and 3rd floor and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 11/14/24 at 08:29 AM the surveyor conducted an interview and observation with Resident #70 while he/she was lying in bed. The sheet covering the mattress was observed to have holes in it at the lower end of the bed towards the foot board and exposed the mattress underneath. Resident #70 expressed to the surveyor that he/she would prefer a sheet that did not have holes. On 11/15/2024 at 09:28 AM the surveyor observed room [ROOM NUMBER]. The surveyor observed that the C-bed bottom dresser drawer was broken, with the right side of the drawer face hanging on the floor. Resident who occupied D-bed was not present in the room at time of observation. The surveyor observed several flies around D-bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to make State of New Jersey inspection results in a place readily accessible to facility residents. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/12/2024 at approximately 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed the state survey results binder in the facility reception area upon entry. The results were on top of the receptionist desk in a black plastic binder. During the Resident Council Meeting on 11/13/2024 at approximately 10:30 AM, 4 of 4 alert and oriented residents in attendance stated to the surveyor that they were not aware of the location of State Survey results. The residents indicated that they would like to be able to have access to the results upon completion of the survey. On 11/13/2024 at 11:01 AM, after completion of the Resident Council meeting, the surveyor again observed the State Survey results binder on the lobby receptionist desk. The binder was clearly labeled and visible, however, it was determined that residents could not easily access the results without asking for staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NJ 173880 Based on observation, interview, review of the medical record and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify a physician of a resident's blood sugar levels exceeding the established parameters (Resident #173) in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin usage. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to implement infection control measures for the handling and storage of respiratory equipment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #70) reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/12/2024 at 10:56 AM, during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed that Resident #70 was not present in the room. The surveyor observed a nebulizer mask placed on top of the nebulizer machine while not in use. The mask was uncovered and exposed to contamination. On 11/14/2024 at 08:25 AM Resident #70 was observed lying in bed. The surveyor observed Resident #70's nebulizer mask not in use and placed in the opened top drawer of the bedside table. The surveyor asked Resident #70 if he/she had received a nebulizer treatment this AM, and the resident responded not yet. The surveyor asked if the last treatment he/she had received was last night and the resident confirmed that they last received a nebulizer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices and perform proper hand hygiene (HH) a.) during medication administration task on 1 of 4 units, the ventilator unit for 2 of 7 resident (Resident #3 and Resident #61) and b.) follow appropriate infection control practices and perform hand hygiene during tracheostomy care (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck to provide an airway and remove secretions from the lungs) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Ventilator/Trach. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. During medication pass on the ventilator unit on 11/13/2024 at 9:45 AM, the surveyor observed the following: a.) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) administered medication to Resident #3 via the J tube (a soft, plastic tube that's surgically inserted into the small intestine to provide nutrition and medicine). LPN #1 disconnected the piston syringe used to administer the medications and reconnected feeding tube and turned tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a A.) sanitary and orderly environment for 3 of 39 rooms on the second floor and various areas on the 3rd floor and B.) a homelike dining atmosphere for 2 of 2 floors, 2nd and 3rd. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) On 8/14/2023 at 9:44 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Surveyor #1 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. A strong odor of urine emanated inside the room. Surveyor #1 observed a floor stain that appeared to be dried, brown liquid. On 8/14/2023 at 10:19 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Surveyor #1 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. A strong odor of urine emanated from the room. On 8/15/2023 at 11:31 AM, Surveyor #1 entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. A strong odor of urine continued to emanate from the room. At that time, Resident #27 who resides in the room told the surveyor that he/she was not wet with urine. On 8/16/2023 at 8:38 AM, Surveyor #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous foods and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/15/2023 from 8:25 to 9:03 AM, the surveyors, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD) and Regional Manager (RM), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. On a middle shelf in the walk-in refrigerator a sheet pan contained 17 defrosted house shakes. The shakes had no pull date or manufacturer expiration date. The RM stated that the shakes are good for 14 days after pulling from freezer to defrost. The RM agreed that there was no way to determine how long the house shake supplements were in the refrigerator. 2. On an upper shelf, an unopened gallon of whole milk had a best if used by date of 07/19/23. The FSD removed the expired gallon of milk to the trash. 3. On an upper shelf in the walk-in freezer (2) boxes covered with clear plastic contained frozen biscuits, according to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs specifically by failing to ensure call devices were in reach of 2 of 6 residents (Residents #68 and Resident #23) reviewed under the Environmental Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A.) On 8/14/2023 at 9:44 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #68 asleep in bed. At that time, Surveyor #1 observed the call device on the floor adjacent to the bed. On 8/15/2023 at 11:33 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #68 asleep in bed. At that time, Surveyor #1 observed the call device on the floor adjacent to the bed. On 8/16/2023 at 8:40 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #68 asleep in bed. At that time, Surveyor #1 observed the call device on the floor adjacent to the bed. On 8/17/2023 at 9:56 AM, Surveyor #1 observed Resident #68's call device on the floor adjacent to the bed. On the same date at 11:45 AM, Surveyor #1 in the company of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment is free from accident hazards specifically by having unattended, unpackaged medications left in 2 of 2 rooms reviewed for Accidents. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/14/2023 at 9:46 AM during the initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed two tablets and one capsule left on the night stand between two resident beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 8/16/2023 at 9:26 AM, the surveyor again observed two tablets and one capsule left on the night stand between two resident beds in room [ROOM NUMBER]. At that time, the surveyor showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) the tablets and capsule. LPN #1 stated that she believed one of the tablets may be Eliquis (medication used to thin blood). LPN #1 was unsure if the tablet and capsule belonged to a specific resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 8/18/2023 at 9:35 AM while in room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to identify and monitor a resident's hemodialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis, as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) treatment access site. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident #161) and was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record Resident # 161 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: End Stage Renal Disease. According to the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) an assessment tool used to facilitate care, dated 8/09/2023 revealed Resident #161 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating Resident #161 was cognitively intact. The MDs section O indicated the Resident received dialysis while a resident. A review of the Physician Order summary on 8/14/2023 did not include a physician order to monitor the dialysis access site. There was no documentation in the medical record that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate precautions to store respiratory equipment in order to prevent the risk of infection, specifically by not containing a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) mask and a continuous positive airway (CPAP) mask in the appropriate manner increasing the risk of potential infection. The deficient practice was evident for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #21, #6) reviewed for Respiratory Care. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 08/16/2023 at 09:35 AM while inside Resident #21's room, the surveyor observed a mask connected to a BiPAP machine left on top of a night stand adjacent to the resident's bed. The mask was not contained in a bag and left exposed to the environment. The top of the nightstand contained a variety of items including but not limited to a dentures container, container of margarine/butter, batteries, and a cellular phone. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants ( CNA #2 and CNA #3) received 12 hours of education annually. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: The surveyor requested five (5) random CNA education files for the year 2022. A review of a facility form titled 2022 In-Service Log revealed the following; CNA #2 completed 11.5 hours. CNA #3 completed 8.5 hours. During an interview with the surveyor on 8/21/2023 at 1:09 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) said the CNA should have 12 hours of education annually. When asked what topics are required to be covered, the DON responded we have a list. She further said yes, Resident rights, abuse and neglect, Infection Control should be included. The surveyor asked who is responsible to ensure the CNA completes 12 hours of education annually and the DON replied Human Resources tracks to ensure they (CNA's) are getting 12 hours. A review of a facility policy titled Staff education with a Plan date of 02/01/2022 revealed under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCELCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ZBL REGENCY OPCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF60%since 12/27/2021
FRANKEL, ELIYAHUIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF40%since 12/27/2021
TZUFON LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 12/27/2021
BERKOWITZ, SAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/27/2021
ORNSTEIN, MARTONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 12/27/2021
FAHEY, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2024
KELLY, BRENDANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
LOFFLER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
ATTENTIVE HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
GRANDISON NURSINGOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
MARTIN FRIEDMAN CPA, P.C.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021
TWOMAGNETS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 10%Other / private 15%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$361per resident / day
operating cost
$10,961per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$359per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315317. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next