Excelcare At Newark LLC
4949 Ogletown-Stanton Road, Newark, DE 19713 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 101 certified beds · (302) 998-6900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,309 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-19)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.1% | 12.7% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 2.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.3% | 10.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.0% | 13.6% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.6% | 21.8% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 97.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 3.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.2% | 20.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.5% | 10.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.0% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.8% | 83.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 23.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.8% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.18 | 1.81 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.40 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 290 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.6%CMS range 52.5–63.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.5–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.8–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 91.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and other documentation as indicated, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to ensure that the proper assessments, interventions, and timely notifications to the medical provider were done when R1 was observed with changes in her clinical status. R1, a resident who previously did not require oxygen, complained of shortness of breath to nursing staff between 3:00 AM and 4:00 AM on [DATE]. The facility lacked evidence that R1's vital signs or respiratory status were monitored, and that the provider was consulted during this time. R1 was transferred to the hospital approximately two hours later. R1 was unresponsive when she arrived at the emergency room and later expired at the hospital. Due to this failure, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was called on [DATE] at 12:00 PM, with an abatement date of [DATE] at 4:15 PM. Findings include:Cross refer F580A review of R1's clinical record revealed:[DATE] - R1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (R)72 reviewed for accidents /safety in the sample of 28 revealed that R72 was smoking outside the facility unsupervised, fell and was found on the ground with a bloody nose and swollen, purplish color 5th finger, which was later identified by x-ray as a right hand 5th finger proximal phalanx fracture. Findings include: Review of R72's Face Sheet located in electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory with hypoxia, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of R72's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/14/24 and located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that for two (R248 and R6) out of six residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards and/or were provided adequate supervision to prevent accidents. R248 sustained harm when the facility failed to ensure staff provided supervision and assistance with care resulting in a fall with facial bone fractures. For R6 the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of an accident hazard. Findings include: 1. Review of R248's clinical record revealed the following: 5/15/23 - R248 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to history of fall(s) and a broken pelvis (the lower part of the trunk between the abdomen and thighs). 5/15/23 - R248 was care planned for self care deficit related to decrease in functional mobility, strength, balance and endurance and interventions included: - one person assist with bed mobility, one person assist with transfers, toileting, bathing and dressing, Set up assist with eating; - Encourage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, putting 78 residents who received meals from the kitchen (2 residents received nutrition via feeding tubes) out of 80 total residents at potential risk for unsanitary meal services. Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 03/29/26 from 9:25 AM through 10:28 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed two Dietary Aides (DA) 1 and DA2 were observed not wearing beard/hair restraints while engaged in food preparation and dishwashing activities. The DM confirmed the two DAs were not wearing beard/hair restraints.2. During an observation and interview with the DM on 03/31/26 from 8:55 AM through 11:36 AM, during the meal serving line revealed, DA1 and DA3 were not wearing beard/hair restraints. The DM stated beard/hair restraints should be worn at all times. The DM stated the facility was out of beard/hair restraints.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a secure manner to prevent unauthorized access when two of five medication carts were left unattended and unlocked. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors placing them at risk for unauthorized access to medications.Findings include:1. During an observation on 04/01/26 at 4:53 AM revealed the medication cart was unlocked on the [NAME] Hall in front of room W102. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)4 was in the room with privacy curtain pulled. The medication cart was not visible from the room. There was one staff member Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)4 down hall delivering linen to another room. At 4:59 AM LPN4 returned to the medication cart and secured it. She confirmed medication cart was left unlocked and could not be visualized from the resident's room.2. During an observation on 04/01/26 at 5:56 AM revealed the medication cart at the nurses station was unlocked. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) walked past the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received written information regarding advanced directives and the right to accept or refuse medical and surgical treatments for two residents of two residents (Resident (R) 19 and R11) reviewed for advanced directives out of a total sample of 42. This failure places the residents at risk of not understanding their rights and options regarding care. Findings include:1. Review of R19's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R19 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side and , major depressive disorder. Review of R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/20/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required two hour timeframe for one resident (Resident (R)110) out of 11 residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 42 residents. This failure had the potential to delay a timely investigation and the implementation of appropriate protective measures, placing resident safety at risk and increasing the potential for further abuse.Findings include: Review of R110's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, and mild cognitive impairment. R110 discharged from the facility on 09/25/25. Review of R110's 5-day Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/17/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R110 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an abuse allegation for one resident (Resident R110) out of 11 residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 42 residents. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for ongoing abuse and failed to ensure residents' safety.Findings include:Review of R110's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit and mild cognitive impairment. The resident was discharged from the facility on 09/25/25.Review of R110's 5-day Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/17/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated R110 was cognitively intact.Review of the Grievance/Concern Form dated 09/18/25 and provided by the facility revealed R110's son called to report that sometime this week a male aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to accurately reflect the resident's code status for two of two residents (Resident (R) 19 and R11) reviewed for care planning out of a total sample of 42. This failure had the potential to cause residents to not receive appropriate care and treatment. Findings include:1. Review of R19's admission Record, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R19 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pain in thoracic spine. The admission Record, indicated R19 was a Full Code. Review R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/20/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident (R)8) of four residents reviewed for falls was safely transferred using a Hoyer (mechanical lift) out of a total sample of 42 residents. This failure has the potential to cause the resident to sustain an injury.Findings include:Review of R8's admission Record located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the tab titled Profile revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, abnormalities of gait, and falls.Review of R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/26 located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out 15 points, which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident was assessed as being totally dependent on staff for activities of living (ADLs) care needs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R4) out of three residents reviewed for death, the facility failed to promote and facilitate R4's self determination with respect to signing multiple consents upon his admission to the facility. Findings include:Review of R4's clinical record revealed: [DATE] - R4 was admitted to the facility on Friday evening shift with a diagnosis that included, but was not limited to prostate cancer with metastasized (spread) to the bone and brain. R4's facesheet revealed that he was listed as the Responsible Party. [DATE] (untimed) - A speech therapy evaluation and plan of treatment documented that R4's BIMS was a 14 out of 15, which represented that R4 had a normal cognitive function. [DATE] 1:22 PM - A BIMS evaluation was performed by E16 (former social worker) that documented a score of 10 out of 15, which represented that R4 had a moderate cognitive impairment. [DATE] - The admission MDS assessment documented R4's BIMS score as a 10. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to consult with R1's physician when R1 complained of shortness of breath and when oxygen therapy was initiated. Findings include:Cross refer F68411/13/25 - R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including a right femur fracture.11/23/25 2:52 PM - E8 (COTA) documented in R1's clinical record, [R1] presents with labored breathing, oxygen saturation of 89% .session shortened.[R1] unable to participate.R1's clinical record lacked evidence that the medical provider was consulted of this new onset of respiratory distress.11/25/25 5:51 AM - A review of EMS documentation revealed a 911 call was made requesting emergency assistance for R1 at the facility.11/25/25 7:04 AM - An EMS Prehospital Care Report documented, .Nursing staff relayed at around 3am [sic] [R1] began complaining of SOB [shortness of breath].they [nursing staff] placed [R1] on 5 lpm [liters per minute] of oxygen via NRB [non-rebreather mask].12/19/25 8:00 AM - During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R4) out of three residents reviewed for death, the facility failed to ensure all the required IDT (interdisciplinary team) members contributed to the 11/14/25 care plan conference. Findings include: Review of R4's clinical record revealed: 11/14/25 10:58 AM - The facility's unsigned and incompleted Care Conference Summary documented that Therapy discussed the resident's progress. Discharge planning was discussed. Nursing went over the resident's care. Under Section D. IDT participants who contributed to plan of care lacked evidence of that a specific Physician/Nurse Practitioner/Physician Assistant contributed and how they contributed. 12/22/25 10:30 AM - During an interview, E12 (SSD) stated that the only facility participants that attended R4's care plan conference was E12 from social services, [name of E10, LPN/Charge Nurse] and an unidentified therapy person. E12 stated that E15 (dietician) provided input ahead of the conference as she would not be present. E12 also stated that R4 had two individuals with him…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R4) out of one resident reviewed for death, the facility failed to ensure R4 had a completed and signed resident agreement upon admission to the facility. Findings include: Review of R4's clinical record revealed: 11/7/25 - R4 was admitted to the facility on Friday evening shift with a diagnosis that included, but was not limited to prostate cancer with metastases to the bone and brain. R4's facesheet revealed that he was listed as the Responsible Party. 12/2/25 9:40 PM - A nursing note documented that R4 passed away in the facility. Review of R4's 11/7/25 DE (Delaware) admission Packet revealed that it was unsigned and incomplete. A written statement by E14 (admission Director) revealed, On November 10th patient [R4] was asleep when trying to do the admission agreement; went back in the afternoon and was still sleeping. On November 11th patient refused due to being tired. Facesheet from the hospital had 2 people listed as siblings that we did not find out they were NOT family members until the brother came in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure containers with rice and pasta were labeled, dated and cleaned; the inside and outside of the oven and microwave were not clean and grease/debris on the handles; the floor under the three-tiered rack had grease and debris; and during meal service the chicken and mixed vegetables were not served at the appropriate temperature on the steam table. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 95 of 95 residents who received meals prepared in the facility. This failure had the potential to affect the spread of food borne illness. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Equipment Cleaning Policy provided by the facility indicated, The director of Dining Services or designee will ensure that all equipment is maintained, kept clean and in a sanitary condition before and after each use .Conventional/Convection Ovens: Clean after each use, inside and out, using soap and water .Microwave: Clean after each use, inside and out, using soap and water. Review of the undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, document review and policy review, the facility failed to act promptly to the concerns and /grievance of the resident council to noise level at shift changes, staff use of phones, earbuds when providing care, and choices offered for breakfast meals for nine of nine (R)60, R4, R21, R37, R14, R39, R5, R73, and R76 sampled residents. This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and feelings of hopelessness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievance Program dated 05/01/2024, documented grievances could be reported verbally or in writing, and the right to receive prompt efforts by the facility to resolve resident grievances. The actions that should be taken in response to grievances or concerns included, but not limited to, investigation and most practicable resolution, routing the grievance to the appropriate departments for ongoing improvement, identifying trends in care, service delivery, and system organization, and developing long term solutions, implementing changes to improve care/service systems. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure that three residents (Resident (R) 23, R71, and R153) in the sample of 28 were accurately assessed for falls and one resident (R54) was accurately assessed for insulin. Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual dated 10/01/19 indicated, . It is important to note here that information obtained should cover the same observation period as specified by the Minimum Data Set [MDS] items on the assessment and should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] completing the assessment. 1. Review of R23's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of falls, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the facility's accident and incident log dated 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, document review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) notification was provided timely for one of three residents (Residents (R) 303) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This had the potential to affect all residents being discharged from services. Findings include: 1. Review of R303's admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of R303's SNF Beneficiary Notification Review form revealed Medicare Part A skilled services start date was 10/09/24 and the last day covered was 11/04/24. Further review revealed no ABN notification was provided prior to the last date of services. During an interview on 02/19/25 at 2:14 PM the Social Service Worker (SSW) stated that she was under the impression that R303 would discharge home on [DATE] since that was the resident's initial projected discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an incident of resident-to-resident abuse was thoroughly investigated for two of five residents (Resident (R)7 and R12) reviewed for abuse out of 23 sample residents. This had the potential to affect residents in the facility who were at risk for abuse. Findings include: 1. Review of R7's Face Sheet located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/24 and located in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. 2. Review of R12's Face Sheet located in the EMR under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that staff appropriately assessed residents with a change in condition for one Resident (R )153 from a sampled 28 residents. Additionaly staff failed to hold laxatives when the resident was having loose stools. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Medication Administration dated 05/01/24 documents Medications are administered under written orders of the attending physician. lf a dose seems excessive considering the resident's age and condition, or a medication order seems to be unrelated to the resident's current diagnosis or condition, the nurse call the provider pharmacy for clarification before the administration of the medication. lf necessary, the provider pharmacy contacts the physician for clarification. This interaction with the pharmacy and the resulting order clarification are documented in the nursing notes and elsewhere in the medical record as appropriate . Review of R153's admission Record located in the resident's electronic medical records (EMR) section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that expired medications and syringes were removed from one of one medication storage room. The failure has the potential for staff to inadvertently use the expired items. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications dated 05/01/24 indicated, .Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect, labels are returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biological are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed . Observation of the facility's main medication storage room next to the nurses' station on 02/17/25 at 1:17 PM revealed the following concerns: Six of six Magellan three-centimeter (cc) syringes with hypodermic need safety needle 23 gauge one inch with an expiration date of 07/31/21 The facility's Intravenous (IV) tray contained the following expired items: one bottle of Imipenem Hydrochloride…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview during the initial kitchen tour, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that proper sanitation practices were in place and that food was stored in accordance with professional standards. Additionally, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dishes were chemically sanitized when dish washing machine temperatures failed to rise to the degree required for heat sanitization. Findings include: 1. 2/29/24 from 9:00 AM to 9:20 AM, observation of the kitchen with E42 (Dietary Services Director) revealed the following: E43 (Dietary Aide) did not have a hair net or beard covering in place. The hand washing sink had no paper towels available. The walk-in freezer had two containers of what appeared to be soup and one container of what appeared to be gravy, all without content description labels, dates of preparation and expiration. The above findings were immediately confirmed with E42. 2. The Wareforce dish washing machine [brand used by the facility] manual indicated 140°F temperature and chlorine/bleach required for sanitization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for five (R37, R63, R96, R446, R447) out of twenty-three residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to meet professional standards of the Delaware Board of Nursing Scope of Practice by having LPNs complete the admission assessment and admission progress note. Findings include: Delaware State Board of Nursing - RN, LPN and NA/UAP Duties 2023 . admission Assessments * - RN . *= Once a care plan is established, the LPN may do assessments . The Braden Scale is a validated tool designed to assess a patient's risk of developing pressure ulcers. National Library of Medicine, Nov. 21, 2022. Cross refer F660, F695, F677 1. Review of R37's clinical record revealed: 2/17/24 - R37 was admitted to the facility. 2/17/24 - E68 (LPN) completed the dehydration risk and the Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk evaluations in R37's electronic medical record (EMR). 2/17/24 4:00 AM - E68 (LPN) wrote R37's clinical admission note in R37's EMR. 2/24/24 - E31 (LPN) completed the elopement form in R37's EMR. An LPN, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of facility documentation it was been determined that for three (R102, R346, R446) out of twently-three residents reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure care preferences were being honored. Findings include: 1. Review of R346's clinical record revealed: 12/5/22 - R346 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including stroke and aphasia (affects ability to communicate). 12/6/22 - Review of R346's care plan for communication problem related to aphasia revised 1/19/24 included interventions to allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, do not rush, request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding, use simple brief words and cues. Other interventions included: resident is able to answer yes/no by nodding, points to things and is able to make needs know to staff at all times. 2/25/23 - Review of the facility's form for verification of investigation documented . 1. Following investigation and interview of witness the assigned CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R96) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification, the facility failed to provide evidence that R96 or her responsible party was notified of Medicare non-coverage prior to her discharge on [DATE]. Findings Include: Review of R96's clinical record revealed: 11/18/23 - R96 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, ataxia (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movements) and weakness. 11/25/23 - R96's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which is reflective of moderate cognitive impairment. 12/20/23 - R96 was discharged from the facility. 3/11/24 2:19 PM -During an interview, E1 (NHA) confirmed that the facility did not have a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form for R96. 3/13/24 3:45 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1, E2 (DON), E3 (Corporate Clinical Operations), E4 (Regional Clinical Specialist) and representatives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R100) out of four residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to have evidence that R100's allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated. Findings include: R100's clinical record revealed: 7/12/24 - R100's admission MDS assessment documented her BIMS as 13 (cognitively intact). 7/20/23 at 12:14 PM - R100 was sent to the hospital for an unrelated medical reason. 7/21/23 at 11:17 AM - The facility's incident report documented by E2 (DON) revealed the following: - . an allegation of abuse; - Resident is in the hospital where incident of abuse was first reported. - Resident is oriented to self . time . place; - Resident was sent to the hospital . During conversation with the case worker, she reported an allegation of physical abuse by someone posing as an aide. She refused to reveal the name of the aide for fear of being killed. - Yes, police were notified. The facility provided the following additional investigative documents in response to R100's allegation of abuse: - 7/21/23 typed statement of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined for three (R55, R103, R247) out of twenty three residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to accurately completed the resident assessments . Findings include: 1. Review of R55's clinical record revealed: 2/8/23 - A physicians order was written for R55 to receive two liters of oxygen to be worn continuously. 1/30/24- A quarterly MDS assessment documented in the special treatments section that oxygen not in use by R55. January 2024 - Review of R55's MAR revealed R55 received oxygen daily. During an interview on 3/6/24 at 10:31 AM E33 (RNAC) confirmed the MDS assessment error. 2. Review of R247's clinical records revealed the following: 12/20/23 - R247 was admitted to the facility. 12/20/23- R247 had a physician's orders for the following medications for Parkinson's Disease: - amantadine 100 mg 1 tablet daily; - carbidopa/levodopa 24/100 mg 3 tablets 3x a day; - entacapone 200 mg 1 tablet 3x a day. 12/21/23 - R247 was care planned for Parkinson's disease. Interventions included but not limited to give medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, it was determined that for one (R95) out of twenty-three residents reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan that accurately reflected R95's medical needs. Findings include: Reviw of R95's record revealed: 12/18/23 - E46 (hospital Infectious Disease MD) documented in R95's Progress Note Infectious Disease, Sepsis - repeat [blood] culture - negative . Endocarditis-Vegetation is small .continue ceftriaxone for total of 6 weeks. Stop date will be January 19, 2024. 12/21/23 - R95 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, heart disease and anxiety. 12/22/23 - R95's care plan included a focus stating, the resident is on IV medications r/t (related to) sepsis with interventions that address the IV access. The interventions do not document the location (LUE) or type of access (PICC). The care plan also included a focus stating, the resident is on antibiotic therapy related to sepsis with interventions that fail to name the specific antibiotic and address the duration of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of R296's clinical record revealed: 6/30/23 - R296 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including kidney cancer and chronic kidney disease. R296 was admitted to the facility directly from a hospital stay during which he had a nephrostomy tube (tube placed to drain urine) placed in his left kidney. R296's left kidney was unable to drain urine related to his kidney cancer. R296 was admitted to the hospital from the facility on the following dates because his nephrostomy tube became dislodged: 8/18/23, 10/14/23, 11/18/23, 12/19/23 and 1/24/24. 3/1/24 - A review of R296's 1/2/24 quarterly Resident Assessment Instrument and the comprehensive care plan, updated 2/28/24, revealed the lack of care plan revisions to reflect monitoring for nephrostomy tube dislodgement and the hospitalizations that R296's had for nephrostomy tube dislodgement on the above dates. 3/7/24 10:20 AM- E47 (LPN) confirmed that R296's care plan had not been revised to reflect his many hospitalizations since he was admitted to the facility. 3/13/24 3:45PM - Findings were reviewed with E1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R96) out of three residents reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to assess R96's functional abilities and consider R96's caregiver's availability and capability to perform required care, to re-evaluate and update R96's changing needs, to show evidence of the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) involvement in the process and to document R96's community referrals and contact information. Findings include: Cross refer F582 Review of R96's clinical record revealed: 11/18/23 - R96 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, ataxia (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movements) and weakness. 11/25/23 - R96's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment documented that R96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which is reflective of moderate cognitive impairment. 11/25/23 - R96's admission MDS documented in Section H Bowel and Bladder that R96 was frequently incontinent for both urinary and bowel continence. R96's admission MDS documented in Section GG Functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R247) out of 3 residents reviewed for discharge, the facility's discharge summary failed to accurately capture and document R247's post-discharge plan of care. Findings include: Review of R247's clinical records revealed the following: 12/20/23 - R247 was admitted to the facility from the hospital. 1/18/24 4:36 PM - A nurse progress notes documented that R247 had an unwitnessed fall that resulted to a skin tear to his left arm and lacerations to the left eye and left cheek. 1/18/24 - R247 had the following physician's orders: - monitor steri strips (used for cuts or wounds that are not too severe); - cleanse skin tear to left cheek with soap and water, apply bacitracin and leave open to air; - cleanse skin tear to left elbow with soap and water, apply bacitracin and cover with dry dressing daily. 1/19/24 - R247 was discharged home via ambulance. 3/11/24 10:59 AM - Review of the form titled BVC - Discharge Instructions and Post Discharge Plan of Care - Version 3 revealed a lack of discharge instructions for wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R31) out of one resident reviewed for rehab and restorative the facility failed to ensure R31 received restorative services consistently when R31 was not walked daily. Findings include: Review of R31's clinical record revealed: 1/17/24 - The CNA Task list for the care of R31 was revised to include the resident is to participate in the restorative walking program and ambulate with walker 30 foot daily or as tolerated. 2/1/24- A Quarterly MDS assessment documented in the special services section that R31 received restorative services of walking training and range of motion (ROM). During an interview on 2/29/24 at 12:04 PM R(31) stated, I was told I had graduated to walking therapy but getting that has been hit or miss. February 2024 - Point of care (POC) CNA responses for assisting R31 to walk lacked evidence that the resident was assisted with walking on the following dates: 2/1, 2/2, 2/3, 2/4, 2/6, 2/10, 2/17, 2/18, 2/19, 2/20, 2/22, 2/24 and 2/25. During an interview on 3/5/24 at 1:00 PM E58 (RN) unit manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that for one (R63) out of one resident reviewed for respiratory, the facility failed to provide care consistent with the professional standards with regards to R63's albuterol nebulizer (neb) treatment. Findings include: Albuterol (Inhalation Route) Proper Usage- . The albuterol inhalation solution should be used with a jet nebulizer that is connected to an air compressor with good air flow .To use the inhalation solution in the nebulizer: -Use one container of solution or mix the exact amount of solution using the dropper provided for each dose. -Place the inhalation solution in the medicine reservoir or nebulizer cup on the machine -Connect the nebulizer to the face mask or mouthpiece. -Use the face mask or mouthpiece to breathe in the medicine. -Use the nebulizer for about 15 minutes, or until the medicine in the nebulizer cup is gone. Mayo Clinic, February 1, 2024 The facility's Nebulizer Therapy policy (dated 4/1/2020) stated, Policy: It is the policy of this facility for nebulizer treatments, once ordered, to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined that for one (R446) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure that R446's transportation needs related to dialysis were met as evidenced by the failure to schedule/confirm transportation to dialysis on 3/6/24. Findings include: Review of R446's clinical record revealed: 2/21/24 - R446 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses, including but not limited to, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis. 2/21/24 - R446's care plan documented, The resident needs dialysis: hemo (hemodialysis) r/t (related to) renal failure with Interventions stating Dialysis (Mon/Wed/Fri) at [hemodialysis facility]. Chair time 7:20 AM. Pick up 6:00 - 6:30 AM. 3/6/24 7:15 AM - The Surveyor observed R446 sitting in a wheelchair in the facility lobby. E1 (NHA) confirmed that R446's ride to hemodialysis did not pick her and the facility was arranging another ride to get her to her dialysis treatment. This hemodialysis treatment was exactly 14 days (2 weeks) from R446's admission date. 3/6/24 9:35 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R2) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to complete an AIMS assessment for R2 a resident taking anti-psychoactive medications. For one (R198) out of one residents reviewed for behavioral-emotional distress the facility failed to effectively monitor R198 for side effects related to use of an antipsychotic medication when AIMS testing was not completed November 2022 - May 2023 during which the resident continued to receive antipsychotic medications. Additionally the facility failed to administer R198's antipsychotic medication [olanzapine] for seven doses due to lapse in pharmacy delivery. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Behavior and Psychoactive Management Program last updated 4/1/20, documented . 1. Monitoring for any adverse side effects of medications, which includes completion of Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) as per recognized standards of practice. 1. Review of R2's clinical record revealed: 3/10/23 - R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two (R27 and R28) randomly observed residents, the facility failed to ensure that the residents received the selected food and drinks from the menu. Findings include: 2/29/24 12:15 PM - During a random dining observation of R28's lunch tray, the meal ticket did not match when R28 did not receive cranberry juice or sauteed spinach. E45 (CNA) confirmed the finding. 3/5/24 8:10 AM - During a random dining observation of R27's breakfast tray, the meal ticket did match when R27 was not served oatmeal. E40 (LPN) confirmed the finding. 3/8/24 12:58 PM - During a random dining observation of R28's lunch tray, the meal ticket did not match when R28 did not receive cranberry juice. E48 (LPN) confirmed the finding. 3/13/24 3:45 PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (Corporate Clinical Operations) , E4 (Regional Clinical Specialist) and representatives from the Ombudsman Office.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Findings include: Review of the 4/1/22 facility policy for Glucometers revealed the following: -Purpose: Disinfection of Blood Glucose Monitoring -Procedure: .3. Use EPA approved disinfectant to disinfect glucometer per glucometer manufacturer's guidelines. The manufacturers guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting state that the glucometer should be cleaned and disinfected after use on each patient. 3/6/24 7:45AM - During a medication observation, E26 (LPN) obtained a blood glucose level on R27 using a glucometer, E26 did not clean or disinfect the glucometer after using it. At 7:56 AM, E26 obtained a blood glucose reading on R15 using the same glucometer that had not been cleaned or sanitized after it had been used on R27. E26 confirmed the findings at 8:05 AM. 3/13/24 3:45PM - Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (Corporate Clinical Operations), E4 (Regional Clinical Specialist) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for staff, consistent with their expected roles. Findings include: Review of the facility Nursing Orientation Check List revealed that nephrostomy (tube placed to drain urine) care was not on the checklist. Review of R296's clinical record revealed: 6/30/23 - R296 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including kidney cancer and chronic kidney disease. R296 had a nephrostomy tube placed in his left kidney during a recent hospitalization. R296's left kidney was unable to drain urine because of his kidney cancer. 7/15/23 - A physician's order was written to flush R296's nephrostomy tube with 10 ml saline flush daily, every day shift. R296 was hospitalized seven times from 7/16/23 through 2/28/24, and the facility physician's order for the nephrostomy flush resumed with R296's facility readmissions. 3/7/24 1:30 PM - During an observation E40 (LPN) flushed R296's nephrostomy tube. During an interview, E40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a MRR policy with time frames for response from the provider for irregularities and a complete process for following up regarding an urgent action irregularity which included time frames for informing the provider of the urgent finding and what to do if the provider fails to response in a certain time frame. Findings include: 3/1/24 - The Surveyor reviewed the Medication Regimen Review policy dated 4/1/20 provided by the facility. Medication Regimen Review . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 7. Timelines and responsibilities for Medication Regimen Review a. The pharmacist shall communicate any recommendations and identified irregularities via written communication within 10 working days of the review. b. If the pharmacist should identify an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect a resident, the DON or designee is informed verbally. c. Facility staff shall act upon all recommendations according to procedures for addressing medication regimen review irregularities.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for two out of two shower rooms reviewed, the facility failed to provide services necessary to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. Findings include: 3/4/24 9:24 AM - During an observation of the East and [NAME] wings shower rooms, several large areas (where the walls met the tiles) of blackened substance were observed. Multiple areas of chipped and broken floor and wall tiles were also observed. 3/4/24 9:45 AM - During an environmental tour, it was observed that floors in rooms E101 through E122 were coated with a thick, blackened, greasy substance. An observation of rooms W101 through W122 revealed blackened, greasy substance on the floors as well. 3/5/24 11:00 AM - The shower rooms and the residents' rooms continued to have the same blackened substance on the walls, and the floors. 3/5/24 1:30 PM - Findings were confirmed with E5 (Cooperate Resource Manager) and E6 (Maintenance/Housekeeping Director Findings were reviewed with E1 (NHA), E2 (DON), E3 (Corporate Clinical Operations), E4 (Regional Clinical Specialist)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of R42's clinical record revealed: 4/22/20 - R42 was admitted to the facility. 12/13/23 - E66 (NP) ordered UA (urinalysis) and C&S (culture and sensitivity) to R/O (rule out) UTI (urinary tract infection). 12/18/23 10:28 AM - Urine culture results reported in R42's EMR stated, Growth- 1 organism growth. R42's EMR did not have readily accessible documentation of the culture results naming the organism and the sensitivities identifying which antibiotic the organism could be treated with. Upon the Surveyor's request, the facility was able to produce a printout from the [laboratory's] website with the 12/15/23 urine culture results, which revealed the organism was Klebsiella oxytoca ESBL (extended-spectrum beta-lactamases). Of note, only a limited number of people have account access to the [laboratory] website. The Surveyor was unable to find evidence of the urine microbiology culture results that showed the organism and sensitivities and documentation of MDRO colonization in R42's EMR . 3. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,309 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $13,270 — penalty dated 2025-02-19
- $16,039 — penalty dated 2024-03-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EXCELCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRANKEL, ELIYAHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 40% | since 10/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DE
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Delaware Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 085025. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.