No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avante At Boca Raton, Inc.

1130 NW 15th Street, Boca Raton, FL 33486 · For profit - Corporation · 144 certified beds · (561) 394-6282 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (561) 394-6282 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1050 NW 15th St Ste 212A · (561) 368-5611 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
701 NW 13th St · (561) 955-2995 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1400 Glades Rd · (561) 447-0000 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1101 NW 15th St · (561) 338-1473 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
Boca Raton Community Middle School, 1251 NW 8th St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.0%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.7%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.5%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.6%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.3%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.5%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.9%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.162.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.321.151.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.4%CMS range 30.6–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 6.4–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge29.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.1–13.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.71
RN hoursweekends
24.3%
Total nursing turnover
44.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 122.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-05)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional assessments and interventions in a timely manner and failed to prevent significant weight loss and pressure ulcer development for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #80 and Resident #75). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Weight Management dated 03/2/2019 showed the following: 1. All Residents admitted to the facility will be weighed on admission. 2. Residents will be weighed monthly unless otherwise ordered by the physician or deemed necessary by the dietician and the interdisciplinary team. 3. Monthly weights will be completed each month. 4. Dietary will evaluate all weights each month. 5. A reweigh will be obtained for any weight change of +/- 5 pounds from the previous weight unless the physician has ordered other parameters. 1. Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson, Cerebral infarction, and Muscle Weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the needs for 2 of 3 residents investigated for Quality of Care, Resident #1 and Resident #2.The findings include:(1) Resident #1 did not receive necessary doses of an expensive multidrug antibiotic and subsequently returned to the hospital to continue treatment. On 12/08/25 at 2:26 PM, an interview was conducted with the Admissions Director (AD). The AD explained that the admission process can start a week prior to admission, which was the case for Resident #1. The AD stated that he would receive the admissions information from the hospital to determine if the facility was appropriate for the admission. According to the AD, he enters the medication list into the pharmacy's computer system to check for availability for all medications required. The AD stated that when he entered the information for the IV Antibiotic Recarbio, he entered the wrong dosage amount by entering milligrams instead of grams. This error caused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to store, serve and prepare foods in a sanitary manner in accordance with standards for food safety professionals. The findings included: 1. During the initial kitchen tour, on 09/02/25 at 9:40 AM, accompanied by the Dietary Manager and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) from a sister facility, the following were noted: a. There was an accumulation of residue on the handles of the ovens.b. There was an accumulation of dust and debris on pipes over cooking equipment and food preparation table. c. In the walk-in cooler, there was a full sized six-inch-deep pan of raw chicken stored on a shelf directly over a five-pound package of raw ground beef on speed rack. d. There was peeling paint, dust and rust in the vents of the a/c [air-conditioner] handler over a cart that was stored in the area that contained coffee and single service condiments (sugar, creamers).e. There was an accumulation of condensation in the opening from the processing area to the room where the air handler was located and the cart containing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in 18 of 90 resident rooms in the facility affecting rooms 122, 125, 129, 130, 202, 204, 208, 109, 111, 112, 300, 313, 315, 325, 215, 219, 228, and 230, 1 of 3 nursing stations (nursing station for 200 Unit), in 1 of 1 entrance in front of kitchen, and 1 of 1 smoking patio. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Right- Safe/Clean/Comfortable Homelike Environment, issued and revised date of 03/02/19, included in part the following: It is the policy of the facility to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment in such a manner to acknowledge and respect resident rights. Observation revealed the following: 1. On 09/02/25 at 10:50 AM, an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] of an overwhelming odor of urine in the room. 2. On 09/02/25 at 11:00 AM, an observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] of a resident in wheelchair in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow the menu and the approved recipe for lunch served on 09/02/25 and the menu for lunch on 09/04/25. The findings included:1. The approved menu for the lunch meal on 09/02/25 documented that the residents were to receive 'Ginger-Barbecue chicken'. During an observation of lunch served to the residents in the Dining room on the 200 unit, on 09/02/25 at 12:20 PM, it was noted that the residents were served one (1) bone in chicken leg as the protein for the meal. At the time of the observation, the Surveyor entered the kitchen and asked the Dietary Manager how much of the protein that residents were to receive for the meal. The Dietary Manager stated that the residents should receive three (3) ounces of the protein for the meal. At the request of the Surveyor, the Dietary Manager placed a piece of the bone-in chicken leg on the facility's kitchen scale and the portion weighed 2 ounces - half of which is non-edible bone and cartilage. The Dietary Manager acknowledged that the chicken leg was not enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to bring incontinent supplies with the resident to an outside appointment for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living, Resident #80; and failed to follow up after a Foot and Ankle Surgeon consultation related to a fracture for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for falls, Resident #72. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly MDS, with a reference date of 06/03/25, documented Resident #80 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that Resident #80 was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), except for eating, dependent upon staff for ambulation via manual wheelchair and was 'always incontinent of urine and bowel without the use of a device. Resident #80's diagnoses at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to resolve grievances voiced by active members of the Residents and Resident Council, including Residents #97, #101, #104, #115, #142, #15, and #10, in a timely manner. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, 'Grievances', with a reference date of 11/28/16 and updated 01/2019, documented:I. Policy Statement:It is the policy of the Facility to quickly act on concerns or grievances and arrive at an appropriate resolution.III. Implementation:In implementing this policy, the Facility recognizes each resident's right to:* Prompt efforts to resolve grievances the resident may have, including those with respect to the behavior of other residents. Prompt efforts .to resolve include facility actively working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance.IV. Procedures:Any resident, family member of a resident, representative of a resident, person acting on behalf of a resident or employee may initiate a Resident Grievance if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve the residents' grievances for 2 of 2 residents' sampled for missing property, Residents #37 and #122. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances updated on 01/2019 documented, in part, .the intent of this policy is to support each resident's right to voice their concerns and grievances (for example, . lost clothing.it is the policy of the facility to quickly act on concerns or grievances and arrive at an appropriate resolution.1. Record review documented Resident #37 had an admission on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include Seizures and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognition impairment. On 09/02/25 at 10:45 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #37 who stated he was transferred to a local hospital in December 2024 and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for scheduled specialist medical appointment in a timely manner for 2 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for choices, Resident #37 and #142. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Quality of Care, revised on 03/02/19, documented .the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices . assist the resident in making appointments. 1. Record review for Resident #37 documented an admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE] with medical diagnoses to include Seizures and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating no cognition impairment. Resident #37's clinical record documented a comprehensive care plan titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it followed professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents observed for Urinary Foley Catheter and Peri-care, Resident #153. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) provided by Director of Nursing (DON) issued 04/01/24 documented in the Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Definitions: EBP refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and gloves use during high contact resident care activities 2. Initiation of EBP. b. An order for EBP will be obtained for residents with any of the following.Urinary Catheters 3. Implementation of EBP: a. Make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for 1 of 3 sampled resident reviewed for tube feeding, Resident #20. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician's Services, with an issued and revised date of 03/02/19, included in part the following: All physician orders will be followed as prescribed and if no followed, the reason shall be recorded on the resident's medical record during that shift. Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents admitted to the Facility with Tube Feedings Already in Place, documented, in part, A resident who is fed by gastrostomy tube shall receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities and to restore, if possible, normal eating skills.Record review for Resident #20 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives and obtain informed consent prior to installing bedside rails, and failed to provide regular inspection and maintenance to identify areas of possible entrapment for 1 of 1 sampled resident, reviewed for bedrails, Resident #90. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Rails with an issued and revised date of 03/02/19, included in part, the following: The facility shall provide adequate management of bedrails to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Procedure: 2. If a bed or side rail is used, the facility will ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bedrails, including but not limited to the following elements: a) Assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. b) Review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of policy and procedure, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it maintained a currently dated posting for the Nurse Staffing Information, which had documented dates of two (2) incorrect days, for 1 of 4 days observed, at the start of this survey, for day of 09/02/25. The findings included:Record review of the facility policy and procedure, titled, Staffing, provided by the Administrator effective and revised 04/16/25 documented in the Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents, staff, and visitors at any given time. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Nurse Staffing document will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information:.b. The current date.2. The facility will post the Nurse Staffing Sheet at the beginning of each shift. 3. The information posted will be:.b. In a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors.An observation on entrance tour to the facility, located at front desk,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the residents' medical records that the identified irregularity by the consulting pharmacist had been reviewed and what, if any, action has been taken to address it, as evidenced by lack of documentation by the attending physician, if no change in the medication, of his or her rationale in the residents' medical records for 2 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Residents #14 and #142. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review with a revised date of 06/01/24, included in part the following: The consultant pharmacist will provide the resident's MRRs (Medical Record Review) to the facility identified personnel who will ensure that the attending physician, medical director, director of nursing and other necessary facility staff receive the recommendations. The attending physician/prescriber should address the consultant's pharmacist's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that only authorized staff had access to the first-floor medication cart #1's keys as evidenced by the Registered Nurse (RN) handed the medication cart keys to a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) to open the smoking room; failed to ensure that residents medications were properly supervised / stored as evidenced by medications being left unattended on the resident's bedside table during a Medication Administration Observation for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #79); failed to ensure that expired wound care dressings were removed from 2 of 2 treatment carts located in the medical preparation room in the first floor and the second floor units; failed to ensure that 2 of 2 Medical Preparation / medication storage room reviewed had readily accessible soap and/or alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) to perform hand hygiene; and failed to ensure the medication storage room was free of resident's personal belongings as evidenced by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food in correct form (mechanical soft), as ordered by the physician for Resident #56. The census at the time of survey was 135. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the most recent complete assessment, an admission MDS, with a reference date of 07/23/25, revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #56's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Cancer, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Thyroid disorder, Malnutrition, and Chronic Lung Disease. Review of Resident #56's physician diet orders included: Regular Diet, Mechanical Soft texture, dated 08/27/25. During an observation of the lunch meal served to the residents in the Dining room on the 200 unit, on 09/02/25 at 12:20 PM, Resident #56 was observed with a piece of bone-in chicken with skin on it. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 38 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (Residents #20, #77, #14); failed to disinfect reusable equipment between residents' use (Resident #128 and #79); and failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration observation for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #95 and #127). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with an issued date of 04/01/24 included in part the following: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Definitions: EBP refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a neglect allegation related to wound care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #3).The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, Misappropriate of Property and Injury of Unknown Source Prevention (ANEMMI), dated 03/02/19, included the following: The facility will develop and operationalize policies and procedures for screening and training employees, protection of residents and for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of property; to include the use of physical and or chemical restraints. The purpose is to ensure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences.Investigation:Investigate different types of incidents; and identify the staff member responsible for the initial reporting, investigation of alleged violations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment measures were implemented for pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 sample residents, Resident #3, reviewed for Pressure Ulcer/Injury, as evidenced by physician orders for wound care and intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy were not followed, increasing the risk of pressure ulcer worsening for Resident #3.The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Clean Dressing Change, dated 03/02/19, included the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure change dressings in accordance with State and federal Regulations, and national guidelines.Procedure:1.Verify and review physician's order for procedure. Record review for Resident #3 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Wedge Compression Fracture of Third Lumbar Vertebra, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Bacteremia, Overactive Bladder and History of Falling. On 07/05/25, Resident #3 was discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to enter orders for indwelling catheter care for a resident admitted with an indwelling catheter for 1 of 1 resident sampled for an indwelling catheter (Resident #3). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control-Indwelling Catheter Care, dated 03/02/19, included the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that the residents receive care and services to prevent urinary tract infections in those residents with an indwelling catheter, in accordance with standards of practice. Record review for Resident #3 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Wedge Compression Fracture of Third Lumbar Vertebra, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Bacteremia and Overactive Bladder. On 07/05/25, Resident #3 was discharged to the hospital from the facility. Review of Section C of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #3 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered ultrasound was scheduled and performed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hypertension, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, and Dysphagia. A review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/06/25, under Section C, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 6 indicating Resident #1 had impaired cognition. Section GG under functional limitations in range of motions revealed Resident #1 had impairment on one side. Toileting and hygiene which included the ability to maintain perineal hygiene, revealed that Resident #1 need substantial and maximal assistance. A review of the wound care progress notes in December 2024 indicated the resident had fungal rashes to the vaginal folds, they were treated with Nystation cream, and which had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for the residents in the facility. The findings included: 1) The shower room on the second floor had brown colored matter on the floor of the shower stall on the left side of the room from the entrance. The wall above the grab bar on the left facing into the stall had a rust colored stain. There were rust colored stains on the surfaces of the grab bars. The walls of the shower were noticeably marked with black stains. The paint on the floor had peeled in several locations. 2) The shower room on the first floor had gaps between the floor and walls on both shower stalls. The floors and walls had black markings. 3) The floor tiles on the south wing of the second floor had noticeable cracks in several tiles. 4) room [ROOM NUMBER], the bed rail had peeling paint with rust colored staining. 5) Privacy Curtains in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 222 had black stains. 6) room [ROOM NUMBER] blanket had holes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen/food service sanitation tour conducted on 04/29/24 at 9 AM and accompanied with the facility's Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the following were noted: (a) The exterior of the exhaust hood system that is located directly over the major cooking equipment was noted to be soiled and covered with rust. It was discussed with the CDM at the time that the rust could fall into foods being prepared and result in food contamination. The CDM stated that she has put in numerous request to maintenance over the past 3 months for the issue to be resolved, however no one has assessed the hood issue. (b) Observation of the ceiling mounted commercial light fixtures (7) noted that exteriors were heavily soiled. Two of the light fixtures were noted to be potentially falling from the ceiling over food preparation and serving areas. The CDM stated that she has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner to ensure an adequate food supply necessary to provide the nutritional needs of 111 of the 120 residents in the facility. The findings included: During the initial kitchen/food service tour conducted on 04/29/24 at 9 AM, with the facility's Certified Dietary Manger (CDM), it was noted there was limited food supplies on hand to ensure that the nutritional needs of the facility's 111 residents who eat by mouth. It was noted that the facility currently had 9 residents who receive their nutrition by a gastrostomy tube feedings. During the initial tour, it was noted a shortage of on-hand food supplies that included: frozen foods (meats, entrees, vegetables, etc.), dairy products (milk, cottage cheese, sliced cheeses, yogurt, etc.), canned foods (fruits, vegetables, puddings, etc.), fresh fruits and vegetables, juices ( individual portion control orange juice, apple juice, cranberry juice, etc.), and daily pantry food supplies (crackers, peanut butter, pastas,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 12 of 27 resident rooms located on the facility's first floor, 11 of 31 rooms located on the facility's second floor, and the second floor dining room. The findings included; During the surveyors screening of the residents and resident rooms on 04/29-30/24 and the environment tour conducted on 05/02/24 accompanied with the facility's Corporate Maintenance Director, the following were noted; First Floor: room [ROOM NUMBER]: A/C filter dust laden, bathroom toilet requires recaulking to the floor, and room call light cord too short. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Bathroom toilet base was loose, and room electrical cover missing. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A/C filter dust lade, and loose wall cable cover. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room window sill in disrepair. room [ROOM NUMBER]: A/C filter dust laden, Room walls (4) damaged and numerous large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the the facility failed to provide 2 (Resident's #60 and #23) of 2 sampled residents with a nourishing, palatable, well balanced bagged meal or snack to take to dialysis appointments. The findings included: 1) During an interview conducted with the alert and interviewable Resident #60 on 04/29/24 and 04/30/24, he stated he has resided in the facility for the past 3 years and leaves the facility for dialysis appointments three times per week (Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday) at 5-5:30 AM. Resident #60 went on to state that a breakfast meal or snack is not provided to him prior to leaving for the dialysis appointments. The resident further stated that a bagged snack or lunch is not being provided on a regular basis to take with him to the dialysis appointments. Stated that when a bagged snack is sent it contains only a package of crackers and a 4 ounce House Shake. The resident also stated he is hungry prior to leaving for dialysis and is also hungry during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility's approved menu was not followed that potentially effected 111 of the facility residents. The findings included 1) Review of the facility's approved menu the week of 04/28/24 noted that 2% Milk is documented to be served to Regular Diet, No Added Salt Diet, Pureed Diet, Mechanical Soft Diet, Renal Diet, and Skim Milk to be served to Low Fat/Cholesterol Diet. Orange Juice to Regular Diet, Mechanical Soft Diet, Pureed diet, Therapeutic Diet. Observation of the facility's food supply on hand conducted on 04/29/24 at 9 AM noted that only Whole Milk was available for residents and no supply of 2% milk and skim milk. Interview with the Certified Dietary Manager at the time of the observation noted that the facility's residents were without milk for the last 2 days and an emergency whole milk order was obtained and delivered on 04/28/24. It was also noted that there was no supply of Orange Juice on hand. She also stated that there has been no supply of Orange Juice for the last 7 days. 2) Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor , and appearance that potentially affected 111 of the facility residents. The findings included: During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 04/29/24 at 9 AM, it was noted that there were approximately 11 pans of foods covered with aluminum foil located on the stove top. Further observation noted that there was no heat being applied to the covered food pans. An interview with the breakfast/lunch [NAME] (Staff A) at the time of the observation noted that all of the pans located on the stove top were for the lunch meal of 04/29/29. Also stated that all foods in the pans were totally cooked and would be put in to the steam table. Further interview noted that the food pans contained lunch foods which were identified as the following: * Maple Glazed Fish (3 pans) * Ground Maple Glazed Fish (1 pan) * Pureed Maple Glazed Fish (1 pan) * Parsley Noodles (2 pans) * Pureed Parsley Noodles (1pan) * Carrots (2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide food preferences and food options of similar nutritive value to potentially 111 residents who may choose not to eat food that is initially served or who request a different meal choice. Findings included: 1) During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 04/29/24 at 11:30 AM, it was noted that approved menu items of maple Glazed Fish, Parsley Noodles, and Carrots were being served to regular, mechanically altered diet and therapeutic diets. Further observation of the meal service noted that there was not an alternate hot entree, hot starch food, or hot vegetable prepared and available as an alternate for the facility residents. Interview with breakfast/lunch [NAME] (Staff A) at the time of observation noted to state a baked chicken breast or leg is supposed to be always available for the lunch and dinner meals but the facility has not had chicken available for meals for over 7 days. Staff A stated she was not informed why chicken was not available for meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide suitable, nourishing snacks to potentially 111 facility residents who want to eat at non-scheduled times or outside of scheduled meal service times. The findings included: 1) During the initial food service tour conducted on 04/29/24 at 9 AM with the facility's Certified Dietary Manager, it was noted low levels of food supplies of frozen, canned, dairy, and daily pantry foods. The surveyor requested a copy of the Snack Menu and list of residents who received scheduled between meal snacks. A review of the facility's Resident Snack Menu noted the following foods to be always available: Puddings Gelatins Cookies Crackers Sandwiches for diabetics Turkey (alternate days) Cheese (alternate days) Peanut Butter & Jelly A review of scheduled Nourishment/Snacks to be prepared daily as part of the residents nutritional care plan (diabetes, underweight, dialysis) noted only 8 listed residents which included Sampled Residents #23, #37, #45, #64, #75, and #98. Further review of the list noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernails grooming for 2 of 3 sampled residents, Residents #26 and #43, observed for nail grooming/care. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) Maintain Abilities revised on 03/02/19 documented .a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good .grooming and personal hygiene . Review of the facility's Job Description for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) documented under essential job functions: personal care functions- assist residents with bathing, dressing, grooming . 1) Review of Resident #26's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. The resident diagnoses included: Seizures, Muscle Weakness, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Expressive Language Disorder, Psychosis, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner for 1 of 10 residents sampled for nutrition (Resident #48). The findings included: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malnutrition. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and had weight loss. Resident #48 was care planned for nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to anorexia on 04/12/24. An intervention included to administer medications as ordered. Record review revealed Resident #48 was sent to the hospital for lethargy on 03/23/24, and returned to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection. Resident #48's last recorded weight at the facility prior to hospitalization was 182.8 pounds (lbs). Resident #48's weight was 162.6 lbs on readmission to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident #48's Nutrition Comprehensive Evaluation/Risk Screen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review , it was determined the facility failed ensure that dialysis communication forms completely and accurately document the condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments for 1 (Resident #23) of 1 resident sampled for dialysis. The findings included: During the review of the clinical record of Resident #23 on 04/30/24 and 05/01/24, the following were noted: Date of admission: [DATE] (original, 12/26/23 (re-admission) Diagnoses: End Stage Renal Disease Current Physician's Orders: Resident to receive Dialysis on T-Th-Sat at Dialysis Center-1 PM Pick-up time for End Stage Renal Disease. During the review of the facility's Dialysis Communication Forms from 02/06/24 through 04/30/24 noted that 24 of the 25 communication documents failed to be properly documented. A review of the facility's form noted that the form has 3 sections which included the following: (1) Facility to Complete Prior to Dialysis: medications administered prior to dialysis, vital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide liquids in a Nectar Thick form for 1 (Resident #60) of 2 resident's with physician ordered thickened liquids. The findings included: During the review of the clinical record of Resident #60, the following were noted: Date Of admission: [DATE] re-admission: [DATE] Diagnoses: Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Acute Kidney Failure, Type 2 Diabetes, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Dyspahgia, Dependence on Dialysis Current Physician Orders: 2/27/24 - Renal Diet, Mechanical Soft Meat, Nectar Consistency, 9/26/23- ProHeal Critical Care 3/1/23 - 1500 ml Fluid Restriction - 900 ml Dietary/600 ml Nursing (7-3 = 240/3-11=300 ml/11-7 = 60 ml 11/2/22 - Dialysis - Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday - pick-up time 05:15 -0545. MDS: 2/7/24 - Quarterly Section C: BIMS =12 (Mild Cognitive Impairment Section D: No Mood issues Section GG: Set-up/Clean Up Assist Section K: NO Swallow Dis - 68 152#, Mechanical Altered Diet, Therapeutic Diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide physician ordered therapeutic diet (Fluid Restriction) of 1 (Resident #60) of 2 residents sampled for Dialysis. The findings included: During the review of the clinical record of Resident #60, the following were noted: Date Of admission: [DATE] re-admission: [DATE] Diagnoses: Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Acute Kidney Failure, Type 2 Diabetes, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Dyspahgia, Dependence on Dialysis Current Physician Orders: 2/27/24 - Renal Diet, Mechanical Soft Meat, Nectar Consistency, 9/26/23- ProHeal Critical Care 3/1/23 - 1500 ml Fluid Restriction - 900 ml Dietary/600 ml Nursing (7-3 = 240/3-11=300 ml/11-7 = 60 ml. 11/2/22 - Dialysis - Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday - pick-up time 05:15 -0545. MDS: 2/7/24 - Quarterly Section C: BIMS =12 (Mild Cognitive Impairment Section D: No Mood issues Section GG: Set-up/Clean Up Assist Section K: NO Swallow Dis - 68 152#, Mechanical Altered Diet, Therapeutic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including the maintenance of equipment in the laundry department. The findings included: 1. A tour of the laundry room conducted on 01/09/2024 at 8:40 AM accompanied by Staff A, the Housekeeping Manager, showed that three large dryers were noted with heavy layers of lint debris on the top and bottom of the filters. Continued observation of the clean linen folding table showed an open round garbage bin with dirty napkins and leftover food debris that had no lids. A record review of the Laundry Dryer Log revealed that the staff documented no data since November 2023. Further review did not show that any documentation was done regarding the laundry dryer lint for today. An interview with Staff A on 01/09/24 at 8:44 AM stated that he was on vacation for the last ten days and that the lint on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional interventions in a timely manner to prevent significant weight loss for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #5, Resident #7, and Resident #6). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Weight Management revised on 03/02/2019 showed the following: Residents will be weighted monthly unless otherwise ordered by the physician or deemed necessary by the dietician and or the interdisciplinary team. Monthly weights will be completed each month. Dietary will evaluate all weights each month. A re-weight will be obtained for any weight change of +/- 5 pounds. from the previous weight unless other parameters have been ordered by the physician. The physician and the resident or resident representative will be notified by the resident's nurse of any significant unexpected and or unplanned weight changes. 1) On 12/01/23, Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with a medical history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it practiced appropriate hand hygiene 1) after performing a blood sugar check for a resident during an Accucheck Observation for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #16); and 2) Before and after medication administration; and 3) failed to disinfect reusable blood pressure equipment before and after each use with an approved EPA as per the facility's policy. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control and Surveillance Program revised on 03/02/19 documented .hand hygiene should be performed .before and after performing any invasive procedure (e.g., finger stick blood sampling) .upon and after coming in contact with a resident's intact skin (e.g. when taking a pulse or blood pressure) .after removing gloves .all shared medical equipment will be cleaned using an EPA-approved disinfectant wipe against TB (tuberculosis) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide service to ensure negative factors that may impact skin integrity and wound healing treatment were prevented for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #80, reviewed for wound care. The findings included: Review of Resident #80's clinical record documented an admission on [DATE] and no readmissions. The resident diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, Myocardial, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, and Muscle Weakness. Review of Resident #80's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of the Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating that the resident has no cognition impairment. The assessment documented under Functional Status that the resident needed extensive assistance with his activities of daily living including toileting and transfers. Further review of the assessment documented that the resident did not have a pressure reducing device for bed and was coded for Risk of Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide restorative services for 1 of 1 residents sampled for position and mobility (Resident #117). The findings included: The facility's policy issued and revised on 03/02/19 titled Specialized Rehabilitative and Restorative Services revealed the facility will provide restorative services such as but not limited to walking, transfer training, bowel and or bladder training, bed mobility, Range of Motion (ROM), splint and brace .when necessary as indicated by the assessment of the interdisciplinary team. An interview was conducted with Resident #117 on 02/13/23 at 2:15 PM. He stated his left shoulder was hurting him. He had a fall a couple of weeks ago and it hurt when his left shoulder was moved. He continued to say that he had Physical Therapy a couple of weeks ago but now no one was working with him to move his left shoulder. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. The Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician orders for tube feeding for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #113). The findings included: Resident #113 was readmitted on [DATE], transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and was readmitted again on 01/23/23. Diagnoses included dysphagia, acute respiratory failure and anemia. An order was noted for enteral feeding with Isosource 1.5 at 55 ml an hour, on at 4:00 PM and off at 12:00 PM dated 01/23/23. In an observation conducted on 02/13/23 at 10:00 AM, Resident #113 was in the room with the tube feeding off. The tube feeding bag was noted with Isosource 1.5 (tube feeding formulary), which started on 02/12/23 at 4:00 PM the day before. At the time of the observation, the tube feeding was at the 300 milliliters (ml) mark out of a 1000 ml capacity bottle. In this observation, Staff V, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated that she just stopped the tube feeding for daily care and that she will restart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide pain management in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents sampled for pain management (Resident #117 and #377). The findings included: 1) The facility's policy titled Pain Management Program issued and revised on 03/02/19 reveals the facility shall provide adequate management of pain to ensure that residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/16/22 revealed his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. His medical diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction with left-sided Hemiplegia, Malignant Neoplasm of the Larynx and Anxiety Disorder. An interview was conducted with Resident #117 on 02/13/23 at 2:15 PM. He stated his left shoulder was hurting him. He had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substance medication reconciliation was accurate for 4 of 6 sampled residents reviewed during the controlled substance record review at the facility's Seaside, 1st floor East and 2nd floor East Units, for Residents #51, #60, #377 and #381. The finding included: Review of the facility's policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration revised on 01/01/22 documented .document the administration of controlled substance in accordance with applicable law .after medication administration, facility staff should .document necessary medication administration/treatment information . 1) On 02/16/23 at 8:04 AM, a side by side review of the facility's 1st floor East Medication cart's controlled substance records was conducted with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The review revealed Resident #51's Controlled Medication Utilization Record (CMUR) for Oxycodone 10 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours as needed for pain. During the review, Staff G, LPN stated once she administer a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the medication error rate was 10.81 percent. Four (4) medication errors were identified while observing a total of 37 opportunities, affecting Residents #82, #380, and #91. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration revised on 01/01/22 documented .prior to preparing or administering medications .staff should follow facility's infection control policy (e.g., handwashing) .prior to administration of medications, facility staff should take all measures required by the facility .verify each time a medication is administered that it is the correct medication, at the correct dose .as set forth in facility's medication administration schedule .after medication administration, facility staff should .document necessary medication administration/treatment information . 1) On 02/13/23 at 4:40 PM, medication administration observation for Resident #82 performed by Staff T, Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to: 1) ensure that it secured the over-the-counter (OTC) medications in an empty resident room; 2) ensure that it secured an OTC medication observed during tour for Resident #46; 3) ensure that it secured an un-ordered OTC and expired prescription medication observed during tour for Resident #4; 4) ensure that it properly secured a second floor Wound Care Treatment Cart; 5) ensure that it properly secured an E-kit which was left unlocked in the Medication Room on the 300 unit; and 6) ensure that it properly secured loose pills in 2 out of 3 carts reviewed, in the Seaside North Medication cart and Second Floor East Medication Cart. The findings included: Review of the facility policy and procedure on [DATE] at 9:48 AM titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revised [DATE] documented in the Policy Statement: . This policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental (Resident #75). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Dental Service, revised on 03/02/19, showed the following: It is the policy of the facility to ensure that residents obtain needed dental services, including routine dental services; to ensure the facility provides the assistance needed or requested to receive these services; to ensure the resident is not inappropriately charged for these services; and if a referral does not occur within three business days, documentation of the facility's to ensure the resident could still eat and drink adequately while awaiting dental services and the extenuating circumstances that led to the delay. Resident #75 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, unspecific dementia, and anemia. A review of the Order Summary Report showed an order for a Dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and recorded review, the facility failed to ensure the correct fluid restrictions as per Physicians orders for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dialysis (Resident #110). The findings included: A chart review showed that Resident #110 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney failure, type 2 diabetes, and dependency on dialysis. The Treatment Administration Records revealed an order for 1500 milliliters (ml) of fluid restriction, with 900 ml for meals and 600 ml provided for nursing, which was dated 01/28/23. In an interview conducted on 02/13/23 at 9:40 AM with Resident #110, he stated that he goes to dialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. He further said that he was aware that he was on a fluid restriction. Closer observation showed 16 ounce Styrofoam cup with water at the bedside. In an observation conducted on 02/13/23 at 5:10 PM, the dinner trays arrived on the unit. At 5:30 PM, Resident #110's tray was placed at the bedside. Closer observation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the Facility failed to notify and ensure that the arbitration agreement grants the Resident or their representative the right to rescind the Agreement within 30 calendar days of signing it for 2 of 3 residents reviewed during the Arbitration review (Resident #83 and Resident #102). The findings included: A review of the Facility's Arbitration Agreement titled Voluntary Binding Arbitration Agreement provided by facility staff, under section F showed the following. This Agreement may be canceled by written notice sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Facility's Administrator within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Resident's admission date. If alleged acts underlying the dispute are committed before the cancellation date, this Agreement shall be binding with respect to said alleged acts. If not canceled in writing, this Agreement shall be binding on this admission and all `the Resident's other admissions to the Facility without any need for further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVANTE CENTERS — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AG HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/06/1993
DEBBIE KLURMAN 1994 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 06/20/1989
DEENA KLURMAN KRANZ 2000 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 06/20/1989
MONA MIZRACHI 1994 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 06/20/1989
SISEL KLURMAN 2001 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 04/09/2010
BIEGASIEWICZ, KIMBERLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/04/2022
HORNACK, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/24/2019
CHOPRA, SHAWNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2026
OLAZABAL, JUSTINAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 8%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,194per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105521. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next