Avante At Ocala, INC
2021 SW 1st Ave, Ocala, FL 34474 · For profit - Corporation · 133 certified beds · (352) 732-0042 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.9% | 8.7% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.7% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.0% | 4.6% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.6% | 9.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.5% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.9% | 10.5% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.6% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.5% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.5% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.49 | 2.13 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.25 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.5%CMS range 29.8–51.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.2%CMS range 8.1–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.7–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 126.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to keep 1 Resident (Resident #3) out of 3 Residents sampled receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming in keeping fingernails clean and trimmed. Findings include:During an observation on 6/3/2026 at 9:25 AM Resident #3 lying in bed with a left-hand contracture and right hand with very long dirty fingernails. Unable to observe the nail length of left-hand nail length due to contracture. The fingernails extend about 1/2 inch to 3/4 of an inch from fingertips and dirty (Photo evidence). Review of Resident #3's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, depressed mood, contracture left hand, contracture of left wrist and a history of traumatic brain injury. During an interview on 6/3/2026 at 9:25 AM Resident #3 stated, I don't like them, I want my nails cut and clean. It has been a while since they did my nails, I don't remember when the last time was. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident (Resident #1) out of 3 Residents sampled receives necessary treatment and services for pressure sores consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing.Findings include:During the record review of Resident #1 medical record the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of fracture of superior rim of left pubis, fracture of left acetabulum, fracture of sacrum, and fracture of superior rim of right pubis. Review of the nursing admission assessment completed on the same day 3/16/2026 of admission noted that Resident #1 had a pressure ulcer on the sacrum and a skin tear on right forearm. Review of Resident #1's physician orders noted there were no orders for wound care on pressure ulcer or skin tear until 3/23/2026. Wound care order read clean sacrum with n/s (normal saline), pat dry and cover with dry dressing one time a day for pressure. This was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the individual responsible for directing the dietary service met the required qualifications in accordance with regulatory requirements affecting all residents receiving dietary services by increasing the risk of inadequate nutritional management, improper food safety practices, and noncompliance with dietary regulations.Findings include:Review of the Dietary Manager's personnel file, the file did not contain documentation the staff member working as the Dietary Manager had the required qualifications. A request was made for the Dietary Manager's certification/education as a Certified Dietary Manager, Certified Service Manager, or similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body, or an associate's degree or higher for food service managers or dietary managers.During an interview on 3/25/2026 at 11:30 AM the Corporate Dietary Manager stated the Dietary Manager does not have the required qualifications in accordance with regulatory requirements.Review of the policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of policies and procedures, the facility administration failed to administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of each resident by failing to fully implement performance improvement plans for identified non-compliance related to Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, medication storage, medication administration errors, wound care, and infection control.Findings include:Review of the job description titled Nursing Home Administrator read, Purpose: To direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state and local standards governing long term care facilities to ensure that the highest degree of quality care can be provided to the residents at all times. He sent on job functions colon's responsibilities include but are not limited to the following: a period administrative functions. Duties: create and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-26 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the full implementation of the facility's developed performance improvement plans to correct the facility's identified quality deficiencies for wound management, medication administration, infection control, and preadmission screening.Findings include:During an interview on 3/26/2026 at 8:37 AM, the Administrator stated the facility had identified concerns regarding preadmission screening and resident review and initiated a performance improvement project on 1/12/2026, regarding wound management and pharmacy recommendations and initiated a performance improvement project on 2/1/2026, regarding infection control and initiated a performance improvement plan on 2/13/2026. A request was made to review the performance improvement plan [PIP] and all related documentation to verify the implementation of the performance improvement. Review of the documentation provided did not include a PIP for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). Documentation was requested; no documentation was provided.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for resident access to accommodate room lighting on 3 of 3 hallways and failed to ensure all telephones and window blind mechanisms were in working order.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 9:40 AM there was a light fixture on the wall behind the resident's bed. There was no cord attached to the light fixture that would enable the resident to engage the light. The light was off behind Resident #127's bed. During an interview on 3/23/2026 at 9:40 AM Resident #127 stated, There is no cord on the light for me to turn the light on or off. During observations on 3/24/2025 beginning at 12:00 PM of the 100 and 200 hall a total of eight residents on the 100 hall, Residents #127, #59, #1, #100, #132, #121, #72, and #16; and nine residents on the 200 hall, Residents #54, #49, #6, #26, #104, #85, #105, #139 and #25 did not have a pull cord attached to the light to enable the residents to turn the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was accurate for 3 of 4 residents, Residents #2, #11, and #28, assessed for accuracy of PASRR.Findings Include: 1) Review of Resident #11's clinical record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include adjustment disorder with depressed mood. Review of Resident #1's State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 10/22/2025 did not document any mental illness. Review of Resident #11's physician orders dated 10/23/2025 read Trazodone HCL oral tablet 50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression Record review of Resident #11's Psychiatry Subsequent Note by (Name of the Psychiatry service) dated 12/2/2025 read, Trazodone HCL oral tablet 50 mg give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression. The history suggests that this patient has suffered from episodes of depression lasting for more than 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff and an effective staffing system was in place to meet resident needs. Findings include:During an observation on 03/23/2026 at 05:30 AM, there were three vehicles in the facility parking lot. Upon entry into the facility an observation was made of minimal staff presence and one call light was persistently ringing in room [ROOM NUMBER].During the initial tour on 03/23/2026 at 5:35 AM of the North, South, and East Wings, several residents were observed awake. Discrepancies were identified on staffing communication boards, staffing assignment sheets, and actual clinical staff present in the facility. Total midnight census for residents was 129, included in the total were two residents ordered for one-on-one sitter observation, Residents #101 and #144. There were four registered nurses (RN) and five Certified Nursing Assistances physically present in the building. During an observation on 3/23/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment, increasing the risk of contamination, foodborne illness, and infection.Findings include:During an observation on 3/23/2026 beginning at 9:32 AM in the kitchen there was food debris and residue present under the food prep tables, missing floor tiles in multiple areas around the kitchen exposing holes in the walls, and a live roach crawling on the wall.During an observation on 03/25/2026 at 11:30 AM in the kitchen there was food debris and residue present under the food preparation tables, grease residue present on the kitchen walls, dried food splatter on kitchen walls and ceiling, holes present in the kitchen walls and baseboard areas, large areas of missing floor tiles exposing concrete surfaces, a live roach observed crawling on the wall above the dishwashing area, multiple live roaches observed crawling from behind a metal plate affixed to the wall near the dishwashing area, food debris present on a cart used for food preparation, and an accumulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to encode and transmit the resident discharge assessment for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #136, reviewed for minimum data set [MDS] completion. Findings include:Review of Resident #136's medical record documented the resident was discharged on 11/11/2025.Review of Resident #136's Minimum Data Set (MDS) did not document a Discharge MDS Assessment. During an interview on 3/24/2026 at 3:08 PM Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse Lead MDS Coordinator, stated, [Resident #136's name] discharge assessment was never done. We would have had to do the assessment so it can register.Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident assessment Instrument with a last approval date of 2/24/2026 read, Policy: It is the policy of the facility to adhere to the following procedures related to the proper documentation and utilization of a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) to ensure a comprehensive and accurate assessment of residents will be completed in the format and in accordance with time frames stipulated by the Department of Health and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate and reflected the resident's current status for 3 of 12 residents, Residents #17, #50, and #152, reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) accuracy.Findings include: 1) During an observation on March 23, 2026, at 11:53 AM of Resident #50, the resident had no teeth. Review of the Modification of Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documented under Section L for Oral/Dental Status subsection B which asks does the resident have no natural teeth or tooth fragments, it was marked No. During an interview on March 25, 2026, at 10:23 AM, Staff C, LPN stated the entry of no for No natural teeth or tooth fragments was marked incorrectly. Review of the resident's denture appointment documentation from [name of local dental service] dated September 19, 2025, indicated Resident #50 had no teeth. 2) Record review of occupational therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] for Resident #17 documented a past medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for 3 of 12 residents, Residents #8, #17, and #28, reviewed for comprehensive, person-centered care plans. Findings Include: 1) During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 9:30 AM Resident #8 was sleeping and did respond to being addressed by name. Resident was dressed and lying in bed covered with a blanket. The head of the bed was elevated. During an interview on 3/23/2026 at 4:30 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, She [Resident #8] is on hospice. A request was made to review Resident #8's care plan for hospice. The DON said the resident stated she did not want hospice and then wanted hospice. [Resident #8's name] should have an order for hospice and have a care plan for hospice. During an interview on 3/24/2026 at 8:20 AM Business Office Manager (BOM) provided a Change in [NAME] form for Resident #8 and stated, Here is the hospice information about the Resident. Review of the Long Term Care Facility-Change in [NAME] form for Resident #8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for nail care for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #86, reviewed for ADL care. Findings includeDuring an interview on 03/23/2026 at 2:04 PM Resident Representative for Resident #86 stated, They don't cut her [Resident #86's] nails, and her nails were digging into her palm the last time I saw her. During an observation on 03/24/2026 at 9:18 AM Resident #86's right hand was contracted into a closed position. The Resident's fingernails extended beyond her fingertips, touching the palm of her right hand.During an observation on 03/25/2026 at 8:53 AM, Resident #86 had a brace on her right arm and a washcloth in her right hand. The Resident's fingernails were approximately 1-1.5 inches long on her right thumb, right second finger, right third finger and right fourth finger. During an interview on 03/25/2026 at 10:31 AM, Staff A, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, I'm planning on giving her a bath in a little while. Her nails are too long right now. The CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain the medication dosage prior to administration for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #84, and failed to ensure wound care treatment orders and wound care for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #157, observed for wounds. Findings include: Review of Resident #84's physician order dated 3/10/2026 read, Voltaren external gel 1% diclofenac sodium topical. Apply to knees topically before meals and at bedtime for pain. The required dosage for application is not documented. Review of Resident #84's Medication Administration Record for the period of 03/01/2026 to 03/25/2026 documented the Voltaren gel was administered. During an interview on 3/25/2026 at 1:46 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The Voltaren order does not have a dosage. Review of my.clevelandclinic.org read, Voltaren Gel is a type of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). This medication can cause serious bleeding, ulcers, or tears in the stomach. These problems can occur at any time and with no warning signs. They are more common with long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure that nebulizer mask stored after use consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 residents( Resident # 84 and Resident #121) of 6 Residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #84's clinical record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include osteomyelitis (infection in the bone), acute respiratory failure, and pneumonia. During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 10:50 AM of Resident #84's room, the resident's nebulizer mask was lying across the nebulizer machine on the bedside table open to air and not in a bag. During an interview on 3/23/2026 at 10:50 AM Resident 84 stated, I take breathing treatments two times a day. I had the treatment this morning around 8 AM. During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 3:30 PM of Resident #84's room, the resident's nebulizer mask was lying across the nebulizer machine on the bedside table, open to air and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not five percent or greater for 2 out of 37 observations. The facility had a medication error rate of 5.41%.Findings include:During an observation on 3/25/2026 at 8:29 AM Staff BB, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was preparing medications for Resident #100. Staff BB placed an 81 milligram (mg) chewable aspirin into the medication cup along with other prescribed medications. Prior to Staff BB entering Resident #100's room, the surveyor requested verification of the order for the 81 mg aspirin. During an interview on 3/25/2026 at 8:34 AM with Staff BB, LPN stated, [Resident #100's name] has an order for Aspirin 81 milligrams delayed release. I cannot interchange the two different Aspirins. I will have to go look for the medication in the medication room.Review of Resident #100's physician order dated 10/7/2025 read, Aspirin 81 Tablet Delayed Release 81 mg [milligram] (Aspirin) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for heart health.During an observation on 3/25/2026 at 8:50 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs were secured and/or not expired in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 3 units, for Residents #28, #155, #156, residents observed with unsecured and/or expired medications, not securing medications when unattended for 1 of 5 medication carts, and expired medications for 2 of 5 medication carts.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 10:20 AM of Resident #155's room one bottle of Xlear Nasal decongestant and one bottle of extra strength Tums Antacid were on Resident #155's bedside table unsecured. (Photograph evidence obtained). During an observation on 3/23/2026 at 2:54 PM of Resident #155's room there was one bottle of Xlear Nasal decongestant and one bottle of extra strength Tums Antacid on Resident #155's bedside table unsecured. During an observation on 3/24/2026 at 2:58 PM with the Clinical Staff one bottle of Xlear Nasal decongestant and one bottle of extra strength Tums Antacid were on Resident #155's bedside table unsecured. 2) During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 5 of 8 residents, Residents #11, #12, #14, #49, and #77, reviewed for medical records.Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #11's physician order dated 12/3/2025 read, Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Tablet 40 mg [milligrams], Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for HPLD [hyperlipidemia]. Review of Resident #11's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for March 2026 revealed no documentation for administration of Atorvastatin Calcium Tablet 40 mg on 3/10/2026 and 3/15/2026. Review of Resident #11's physician order dated 12/3/2025 read, Potassium Chloride ER [Extended Release] 10 meq [milliequivalent], Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypokalemia. Review of Resident #11's MAR for March 2026 revealed no documentation for administration of Potassium Chloride ER 10 meq on 3/10/2026, and 3/15/2026. Review of Resident #11's physician order dated 10/3/2025 read, Apixaban Oral Tablet 2.5 mg, Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for DVT [Deep Vein Thrombosis]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene during medication administration, failed to ensure staff sanitized enteral medication flush syringe, failed to ensure an infection control barrier was provided in the laundry room, and failed to ensure staff used appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for the residents on transmission based precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 3/25/2026 at 8:50 AM, Staff AA, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), exited a resident's room and walked to the medication cart, and poured medications for Resident #142 without performing hand hygiene. Staff AA entered Resident #142's room, did not perform hand hygiene, handed the resident his medication and handed the resident a Styrofoam cup to drink water, touching the straw. Staff AA exited Resident #142's room without performing hand hygiene. Staff AA began to pour Resident #76's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to management of a metabolic condition/concern related to hypokalemia for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed for nutritional services and failed develop a care plan to address 1 (Resident #1) of 3 with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder reviewed for behavioral health.Findings include: 1.) Review of Resident #4's care plan, initiated 8/16/2023, documented Resident #4 had a metabolic condition/concern related to hypokalemia [low potassium]. Resident #4's care plan documented nutritional interventions that included, RD [Registered Dietician] to evaluate quarterly and PRN [as needed]. Monitor caloric intake, observe/review/estimate needs and make recommendations as indicated. Review of Resident #4's clinical record failed to reveal documentation the Registered Dietician had completed quarterly evaluations of Resident #4 to monitor Resident #4's caloric intake and to observe/review/estimate Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to ensure sufficient clean linen, washcloths, towels, and protective bed pads, to meet the care needs of residents Findings include:During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 4:30 PM, Resident #5 stated, At the end of a shift, we have to wait for the laundry to deliver or someone has to go get some from the laundry. The laundry is not open during the night shift.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 4:45 PM Resident #1 stated, I do not have anything to wash my face and hands.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 6:15 PM, Resident #6 stated, The aids scramble at the end of shift to find bed pads that help keep the sheets dry. They do not have enough.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 8:40 PM Resident #2 stated, I have reported it [not enough linens, washcloths or towels]. They do not have enough to last the night. I have had to wait to get clean washcloths and towels.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 4:58 PM Staff L, Laundry Staff stated, Generally the CNAs will let me know if they need any linen. I work until 12 midnight. They do run…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations, and policy and procedure review the facility failed to ensure snacks were offered and/or served to 5 of 5 residents, Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5, sampled for evening snacks.Findings include:During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 4:30 PM Resident #3 stated, I am a diabetic. They never come to you or your room and ask if you want a snack. You can get a snack if you go to the nurses' station and ask for one. Residents #4 and #5 were present during the interview. Resident #4 stated, That is if there is someone at the desk to ask. Resident #5 added, Not all the residents can come to the nursing station. My roommate can't come to the nurses' station. The CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) should check with all the residents and ask them if they want a snack.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 4:45 PM with Resident #1 when asked when snacks are provided Resident #1 stated, They don't come around and give you snacks.During an interview on 8/13/2025 at 8:40 PM, Resident #2 stated, I don't like to leave my room because I have seizures, and I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents medical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #1, reviewed for mood and behaviors. Findings include: Review of the Active Orders for Resident #1, physician's order dated 12/25/2024, provided for a documentation system to track Resident #1 for behavior monitoring and staff interventions that read as follows, Behavior code-0-no behavior, 1-Fear/panic, 2-anger, 3-Scream/yell, 4-Danger/self/others, 5-Delusions, 6-Hallucinations, 7-Sad/tearful, 8-Emotion/Acts withdrawal, 9-other. Interventions - 1-music/aromatherapy, 2-Reminiscence/reality orient, 3-Exercise/activity, 4-1:4 5-Reduce stim [stimuli] 6-PRN [as needed] med outcome I-improved S-Same, W-Worse, Side Effects - 0-none, 1-EPS [extrapyramidal symptoms] 2-Tardive Dys [Dyskinesia] 3-Hypotension, 4-Inc behavior, 5-Sedation/drowsy, 6-Inc Falls/dizzy as needed for behavior. Review of Resident #1 physician order dated 3/16/2025 read, Depakote Sprinkles Oral Capsule Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 MG (milligram)give 250 mg by mouth two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screen was completed for 1 of 2 residents who were diagnosed with serious mental disorder, Resident #58. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's admission record with an initial admission date of 10/20/2022 and the most recent admission date of 7/25/2024 revealed Resident #58 had diagnosis of bipolar disorder, with an onset date of 1/6/2020. Review of Resident #58's Level I PASRR screening dated 10/6/2023 showed depressive disorder documented under PASRR Screen Decision-Making section for mental illness. Review of Resident #58's clinical records failed to show documentation Resident #58's diagnosis of bipolar disorder had been included on his Level I PASRR screening dated 10/6/2023. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 10:04 AM, the Director of Nursing confirmed Resident #58's diagnosis of bipolar disorder had not been included on his Level I PASRR screening dated 10/6/2023.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care according to professional standard of practice by administering narcotic pain medication out of parameters for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, Residents #73 and #318. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #73's physician order dated 10/2/2024 read, Tramadol HCl Oral Tablet 50 mg [milligrams] (Tramadol HCl) Controlled Drug Give 1 tablet via G-Tube [gastrostomy tube] every 8 hours for pain scale 5-10. Review of Resident #73's care plan dated 3/8/2022 read, Focus: [Resident #73's name] has the potential for alteration in comfort related to: limited mobility, general body aches, diabetes . Interventions . Medicate for pain as ordered. Review of Resident #73's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 showed the resident received 6:00 AM dose of Tramadol 50 mg on 10/4/2024, 10/5/2024, 10/6/2024, 10/7/2024, 10/8/2024, 10/9/2024, 10/10/2024, 10/11/2024, 10/12/2024 and 10/15/2024 with the pain level documented as zero, and on 10/8/2024 with the pain level documented as NA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2) During an observation on 10/14/2024 at 10:17 AM, Resident #8 was lying in bed watching television. There was one tube of Diclofenac Sodium gel in a plastic bin on the resident's overbed table. During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 8:15 AM, Resident #8 was lying in bed sleeping. There was one tube of Diclofenac Sodium gel in a plastic bin on her overbed table. During an interview on 10/15/2024 at 11:19 AM, Resident #8 stated, I keep the gel there all the time because I use it a lot. Review of Resident #8's physician order dated 10/8/2024 read, [Brand Name of Product] (Diclofenac Sodium) Topical, Apply to affected area topically every day and evening shift for pain. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 11:28 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, It is my expectation that all residents are assessed to be able to self-administer their medications, and if they are able to, then those medications should be kept in a lockbox. Review of the facility policy and procedure titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals dated 1/11/2024 read, Procedure . 3. General Storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored, covered, labeled, or discarded in the areas of the kitchen and reach-in coolers (Photographic evidence obtained). Findings include: During an observation on 10/14/2024 at 9:00 AM, while conducting the initial walk-through tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), there were assorted cut melon and other fruit that were not in the original container without an identifying or date label in the reach-in cooler, two 10-pound rolls of raw ground beef laying on the counter not prepped in a pan or under running water, and uncovered and undated pans containing cake. During an interview on 10/14/2024 at 9:05 AM, the Morning Charge [NAME] stated she should not have placed the dirty rolls of raw ground beef on the counter and the beef should have been in the prep sink with running water. During an interview on 10/14/2024 at 9:07 AM, the CDM verified the unmarked fruit container was in the reach-in cooler without an identifying label or date and confirmed that the raw…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper personal protective equipment while providing high contact care to the residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions to prevent the possible spread of infection and communicable diseases. Findings include: During an observation on 10/16/2024 at 1:55 PM, Resident #1's room was had a signage on the door that read, Stop. Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Everyone must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities: Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Linens, Providing Hygiene, Changing briefs or assisting with toileting, Device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy, Wound Care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. The Infection Prevention Officer was applying a wound dressing on Resident #1's lower left leg. The Infection Prevention Officer did not wear a gown during the dressing change for Resident #1. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflects the resident's status for 2 of 3 residents, Residents #38 and #121. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #38 physician's order dated 2/23/2023 documented, oxygen at 2 liters/min [2 liters per minute] via nasal cannula for sob [shortness of breath] as needed. Review of Resident #38's Oxygen Sats [saturation] Summary documented, Oxygen via nasal cannula on 5/26/2023, 5/23/2023, 5/22/2023, 5/19/2023, 5/18/2023, and 5/15/2023. Review of Resident #38's MDS (Minimum Data Set) Annual dated 5/27/2023 documented, Section O Special Treatment procedures, and programs. 2. While a Resident. Oxygen. No. 2) Review of Resident #121's medical record documented the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include aftercare following joint replacement. Review of the physician's order dated 5/23/23 read, Pt. [patient] to discharge home on 5/26/23 patient declined home health but therapy wants to discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-15 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was diagnosed with a serious mental illness received re-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) to ensure the resident receives care and services in the most appropriate setting for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #23 for PASARR. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's admission record documented Resident #23 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia on 1/26/2023. Review of Resident #23's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/28/2023 documented, Section I, subcategory 1600, of the MDS indicates an active diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed no level II preadmission screening and resident reviewed (PASARR) was in the medical record. Review of Resident #23's (Name of the Psychiatry Provider Group) Psychiatry Subsequent Note dated 12/15/2023 documented, Chief Complaint: Patient reported hallucinations and delusions. Reason for today's encounter: Today,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services for central venous access devices in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #174, and for treatment and care of contractures for 1 of 3 residents, Residents #92. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 6/12/2023 at 11:30 AM Resident #174 was lying in bed with a single lumen midline covered with a transparent dressing dated 6/4/2023. During an observation on 6/13/2023 at 8:45 AM Resident #174 was lying in bed with a single lumen midline covered with a transparent dressing dated 6/4/2023. During an observation on 6/14/2023 at 8:10 AM Resident #174 was lying in bed with a single lumen Midline covered with a transparent dressing dated 6/4/2023. During an interview on 6/14/2023 at 8:14AM with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, I just flushed the line. The dressing is dated 6/4/2023, midline dressing should be changed every seven days, the dressing should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents, Residents #84 and #95. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 6/13/2023 at 8:19 AM Resident #84 was lying in bed and had a nasal cannula and tubing lying on the floor by the resident's shoe. The tubing was dated 6/5/2023. (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 6/13/2023 at 9:30 AM Resident #84 was lying in bed with oxygen being administer via nasal cannula at 3.5 liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was dated 6/5/2023. During an interview on 6/13/2023 at 4:10 PM Staff D, License Practical Nurse stated, Oxygen is being administer close to 4 liters I will adjust it a little. The oxygen tubing is dated 6/5/2023 it should have been changed. During an interview on 6/13/2023 at 4:25 PM Director of Nursing stated, The nasal cannula and tubing should have been replaced once the staff found it on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments to permit only authorized personnel to have access for 1 of 3 hallways, the South Unit. Findings include: 1) During an observation on 6/12/23 at 10:30 AM in Resident #8's room there was a tube of Mupirocin Ointment (a medicated ointment used to treat certain skin infections) on the bedside table. (Photographic evidence obtained). During an observation on 6/13/23 at 11:30 AM in Resident #8's room there was a tube of Mupirocin Ointment on the bedside table. During an observation on 6/14/23 at 10:20 AM in Resident #8's room there was a tube of Mupirocin Ointment on the bedside table. Review of the physicians' orders did not have an order for Resident #8 for Mupirocin Ointment or an order for Resident #8 to have medications at bedside. During an interview on 6/12/23 at 10:28 AM Resident #8 stated, That is my cream for my skin sore. I use it anytime my sore opens up. During an Interview on 6/14/23 at 10:28 AM the Director of Nursing stated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AVANTE CENTERS — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG HOLDINGS, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/10/2008 |
| DEBBIE KLURMAN 1994 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 06/20/1989 |
| DEENA KLURMAN KRANZ 2000 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 06/20/1989 |
| MONA MIZRACHI 1994 TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 06/20/1989 |
| SISEL KLURMAN 2001 REVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 04/09/2010 |
| BIEGASIEWICZ, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/04/2022 |
| HORNACK, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/24/2019 |
| AVANTE GROUP, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/17/2025 |
| CHOPRA, SHAWN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2025 |
| SNOWDEN, FAITH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106084. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.