No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Avante At Lake Worth, Inc.

2501 N A St, Lake Worth, FL 33460 · For profit - Corporation · 138 certified beds · (561) 421-4041 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0610) — most recent May 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation$28,275 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,275 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-04)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1520 10th Ave N · (561) 540-1657 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2525 N Dixie Hwy · (561) 588-2252 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2505 N Dixie Hwy · (561) 284-6087 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.7%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms12.6%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.6%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.9%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.0%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.6%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.5%94.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.7%9.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.622.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.291.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

27.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

27.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF27.8%CMS range 15.7–44.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.0–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.8–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
38.1%
Total nursing turnover
45.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 109.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-30)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent an elopement, for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for an elopement (Resident #1). The facility's failure to prevent an elopement placed Resident #1 at a likelihood of serious harm, injury or death. While out of the facility on 08/23/25, Resident #1 got lost, and was assisted by a stranger who called law enforcement. She was confused and could not tell them where she currently lived. The facility was not aware the resident was missing for two hours. Two people came to the facility to inform the receptionist there was a person walking around who looked lost and confused, but the receptionist denied the person was a resident of the facility. During dinner time the nursing staff became aware the resident was missing, and a staff member went out with her car to search for the resident. When the staff member observed the police vehicle, she drove over to it, and recognized Resident #1.Resident #1 was then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat 3 of 3 sampled residents in a dignified manner as evidenced by the failure to honor the request to use a shower bed with subsequent non-dignified comments by staff toward Resident #1; failure to speak to and treat Resident #3 in a dignified manner related to requested assistance and food; and failure to speak kindly about residents in a foreign language as heard by Resident #4 who spoke that foreign language.The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and moved to his current room on the Flamingo unit on 11/14/25. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This MDS also documented the resident had impairment on both sides of his body and was totally dependent upon staff for assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered medications were provided to 1 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to administer three doses of Medrol 4 mg (milligrams) to Resident #2.The findings included:Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and diabetes. Review of the admission physician order dated 04/30/26 documented the resident was to receive Medrol 4 mg (milligrams) four times daily starting on 04/30/26 at 6 PM.Review of the corresponding Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the nurses failed to administer the medication on 04/30/26 at 6 PM, on 04/30/26 at 9 PM, and on 05/01/26 at 6 AM. The record lacked any reason for the lack of administration.During an interview on 05/05/26 at 10:46 AM, when asked the process for obtaining medications for newly admitted residents, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and admission nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review and interview, the facility failed to honor resident preferences for 1 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to allow Resident #4 to have an air mattress.The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Avante Mattress Protocol updated June 2022, documented in part.Grade II Intermediate Support Surface: Definition: A powered alternating pressure reducing mattress. Who Do I use it On: 3. Residents non-compliant with turning and reposition and at high risk for skin breakdown with approval from Regional of Clinical Services.Record review revealed that Resident #4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0-15 scale indicating no cognitive impairment. Review of section GG of the quarterly MDS assessment, revealed Resident #4 required maximum assistance to roll left and right: the ability to roll from lying on back to left and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the needs for catheter care for 3 of 3 sampled residents with catheters (Resident #1, #2, and #3).The findings included:1. Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility 02/13/24 with diagnoses of Paraplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis or loss of movement in both legs) and Neuromuscular Dysfunction Of Bladder (when there is damage or dysfunction in the nerves or muscles that control bladder function.) Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This same MDS indicated Resident #1 had a urinary catheter.Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 08/21/25 documented, Resident #1 has (Indwelling Foley) Catheter: Neurogenic bladder with a goal of, Resident #1 will show no signs or symptoms of urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 103 residents who were on oral diets. The findings included: On 05/27/25 at 8:45 am, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The Dietary Manager was present, and the following observations were made: 1. The backsplash of the Vulcan stove top was ladened with dark black residue. 2. The Vulcan double oven had dried on white crusty sediment, and thick black residue in the area just beneath the hinge of the oven door. 3. The Dean fryer had light brown flaky sediment along the upper rim of the fryer. When the cook was asked if the fryer was used today, he said that it was not used today. It was last used yesterday at the dinner meal. 4. The American Dish Service dishwasher rinse cycle temperature was 114' F, not the required 120' F as stated on the metal tag affixed to the oven. The plastic crates used to place dishes into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess for self-administration of medication for 1 of 35 sampled residents, as evidenced by no assessment was completed for Resident #68 to self-administer medication. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Self-Administration of Medication Program revised: 06/26/2024, documented in part, It is the policy of the facility to allow the resident the right to self -administer medication when it has been deemed by the interdisciplinary team that it is clinically appropriate .Each resident is offered the opportunity to self-administer medications during the routine assessment by the facility's interdisciplinary team. Resident's preference will be documented on the appropriate assessment in the medical record. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded in the resident's medical record. Record review revealed Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The most recent comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a resident choice for showers, for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #103). The Findings included: A review of facility's policy titled, Quality of Care, revised on 03/02/19, revealed facility ensures that each resident receives, and the facility provides the necessary care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care, in accordance with State and Federal Regulations. Resident #103 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Central Cord Syndrome, Quadriplegia,Neuromuscular Dysfunction of the Bladder and Major Depressive Disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) under Section C of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 15 indicating Resident #103 had good cognitive function. Section GG revealed Resident #103 was dependent on the ability to bathe self, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to identify and notify of a change in condition for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #91) as evidenced by no documentation of a change in condition in the medical record. The findings included: Review of the policy titled Change in Condition Process revised 3/2/19, documented in part, The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Situations requiring notification include: an accident involving the resident which result in injury, potential to require physician intervention. Upon identification of a change in condition in a resident the nurse will complete an evaluation of the resident's status and document findings on the Change in Condition in the residents' electronic medical record Review of the record revealed Resident #91 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication was addressed in a timely manner for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, as evidenced by an anti-anxiety medication prescribed to Resident #36 did not have a discontinue date. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The comprehensive assessment documented that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 on a 0 to15 scale, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the record revealed an order for Resident #36, dated 03/26/25, for Lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed for anxiety (excessive worry) without a date to discontinue. Review of the April and May Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #36, revealed administration of Lorazepam 0.5mg by staff. A pharmacy consultation report dated 04/16/25 and 5/12/25 for Resident #36, recommended that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse thoroughly for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #307). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Injuries of Unknown Origin, effective 03/01/17, clarified that residents must not be abused by anyone, including facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, family members, visitors, or other individuals. It stated that alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse must be immediately reported to the facility administrator and to other officials in accordance with state and federal law and through established procedures. The detailed investigation and reporting procedure for abuse mandated a thorough investigation, and a grievance form for an allegation of physical abuse without evidence of physical injury. [NAME] A review of the medical records for Resident #307 revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3). Resident #56 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy, Alcohol Dependence with Alcohol-Induced persisting Dementia, Unspecified Psychosis, Major Depressive Disorder, and other Persistent Mood Disorders. A record review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) under Section C of the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) revealed a score of 7 indicating Resident #56 had impaired cognitive function. Section N revealed a yes response to antidepressant. A review of physician orders dated 03/05/25 revealed Trazodone Hydrochloride 50 milligram (mg), to give 0.5 tablet by mouth, two times a day for depression. An additional review of orders revealed the behavior code monitoring every shift as needed for behavior. An additional order revealed Memantine Hydrochloride 5 mg, to give 2 tablets by mouth, two times a day for Dementia. A review of psychiatry progress notes dated 05/08/25 revealed the following This resident struggled with alcohol use resulting in negative consequences on his life. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medications were timely administered for 2 of 6 residents observed for medication passes (Resident #80 and Residetn#409). The facility also failed to follow the physician ordered and prescribed medications for 3 of 38 sampled residents (Resident # 41, Resident #8, and Resident #68). The Findings included: A review of facility's policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, with a recent revision date of 11/15/24, it was revealed the following: to administer the medication within timeframes specified by facility policy or manufacturer's information (proc. 5.4; pg. 97); prior to administration of medication, facility staff should take all measures required by facility policy and applicable law, including confirming that the Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflects the most recent medication order (proc. 3- 3.4; pg. 97). 1). Resident #80 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their Safe Smoking policy to reassessa resident quarterlyand after a change in condition and failed to update the smoking care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking (Resident #72). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Safe Smoking with a revised date of 01/11/19 included in part the following: Screening - A safe smoking screen is performed on admission for a resident who wishes to smoke. Reassessment of the resident occurs annually and/or after a significant change in condition. Record review for Resident #72 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part Generalized Anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the MDS for Resident #72 revealed Significant Change dated 08/22/24. The Care Plan for Resident #72 dated 09/19/23 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, policy review, and review of professional standards of practice, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutrition status for 1 of 4 residents investigated for nutrition (Resident #307). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy on Weight Management last revised on 03/02/19 stated that residents were to be weighed on a monthly basis unless otherwise ordered by the physician or deemed necessary by the dietitian and or the interdisciplinary team. Current professional standards of practice recommend weighing the resident on admission or readmission (to establish a baseline weight), weekly for the first 4 weeks after admission and at least monthly thereafter to help identify and document trends such as slow and progressive weight loss. A review of the policy on modified consistency diets provided by the Dietary Manager (DM) described the mechanical soft diet as a diet used for patients/residents with limited chewing ability. The foods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, policy review, and review of professional standards of practice, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment for enteral feeding to decrease the risk of complications including weight loss and dehydration, for 1 of 7 sampled residents on enteral feeding (Resident #92). The findings included: The facility's policies and procedure for Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance revised on 03/02/19 stated that a resident who is fed by enteral means must receive the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers. A review of current professional standards of practice to promote the safe provision of enteral feeding recommends that the components of the feeding be included in the doctor's order. These include the following: the kind of feeding and its caloric value, the volume of the formula,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide tracheostomy care and services consistent with the professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled for tracheostomy care (Resident #64); failed to obtain oxygen orders for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #408, and Resident #308); and failed to follow orders for oxygen therapies for 3 of 11 residents receiving oxygen (Resident #7, Resident #23, and Resident #66). The Findings included: A review of facility's policy titled, Policies and Procedures: Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning, with a revision date of 03/26/21, revealed the following: the facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care including tracheostomy care, and tracheal suctioning , is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and resident goals and preferences; the facility, in collaboration with the attending practitioner, must perform a comprehensive assessment of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain completed dialysis communication records for 1 of 1 resident sampled for dialysis (Resident #90). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Dialysis with a revised date of 03/02/19 included in part the following: Nurses will educate the resident and/or family/resident representative on risks of non-compliance and document in the resident's clinical record as needed. The facility and the dialysis center should maintain regular communication and should a change in condition occur before or during dialysis treatment the sending facility should communicate the changes in needs to the receiving facility. Record review for Resident #90 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: End Stage Renal Disease, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. The Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented in Section C a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued controlled medications were removed from the medication carts, and initials and time matched on the MAR and control sheet, for 3 of 10 residents reviewed for controlled medication storage (Residents #91, #20, #97). The findings included 1). Resident #91 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Primary Hypertension, Unspecified Mood Affective Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Unspecified Dementia, and Behavioral Disturbances. A review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], under Section C, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating Resident #91 had severely impaired mental cognition. A review of Physician orders dated 11/06/24 revealed Lorazepam 0.5 mg, 1 tablet by mouth twice a day for 7 days. A review of Resident #91's Narcotic sheet revealed 12 counts of Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablets were received on 11/16/24. The medication is to be discontinued on 11/23/24 per physician order. A further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was secured for 1 of 5 medication carts (Flamingo unit). The facility also failed to ensure medications are secured at bedside for 2 of 35 samplef residents (Resident #68 and Resident #8). The findings included: A review of facility's policy titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration with revision date of 11/15/24, revealed the following: the facility staff should not leave medications or chemicals unattended ; and the facility should ensure that medication carts are always locked when out of sight or unattended. 1). Resident #97 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Metabolic Encephalopathy, A review of Minimum Data Set under Section C revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating impaired mental cognition. During a medication pass observation on 05/27/25 at 4:31 PM, Staff R, Registered Nurse, (RN), who stated he has been working in the facility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2). Resident #409 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Absence of Epileptic Syndrome Intractable without Status Epilepticus, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Hyperlipidemia and Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) under Section C revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating Resident #409 had good mental cognition. During a medication pass observation on Flamingo Medication cart 1 with Staff E, a Registered Nurse (RN) on 05/28/25 10:45 AM, it was observed that her computer screen produced a pink color on the 9:00 AM medications for Resident #409. When Staff E , an RN was asked what the pink color meant, she responded, I am administering the medications later than the scheduled time. She added that medications must be administered one hour before and one hour after the scheduled time. She added, I think it is still ok. She administered the following medications: Cefuroxime 250 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet, 2 x a day. This medication was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) guidelines for a resident with sacral wounds and failed to initiate a care plan for a resident on EBP for 1 of 25 residents on EBP (Resident #408). The facility also failed to follow the manufacturer's recommendation for disinfection and storage of glucometer (Resident #73 and failed to follow the professional standards regarding glucose strip storage for 1 of 2 observation of glucose monitoring (Resident # 97). The findings included: A review of facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions issued on 04/01/24, revealed the following: all staff receive training on EBP upon hire and at least annually and are expected to comply with all designated precautions; Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for EBP is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities. A review of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s EBP poster revealed the following: everyone must clean their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable environment for 3 of 3 sampled Residents (Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4). The findings included: 1. Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 03/28/25 at 10:25 AM, when asked if there were any cleanliness concerns regarding the room, Resident #2 stated there were roaches seen all the time. When asked what the facility did about it, Resident #2 stated pest control comes out but believed whatever they are using was not working because she still saw them around. She voiced that they got in her way and went up the walls. It's not acceptable she stated. An observation was made of Resident #2 room, heavy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care is provided such care, for 3 out of 5 sampled residents with tracheostomy (Resident #3, #2, and #4) and failed to ensure trach tube at bedside for 2 out of 5 sampled residents for tracheostomy (Residents #4 and #5). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning with an issued date of 03/26/21 included in part the following: The facility will ensure that residents who need respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and resident goals and preferences. Procedures: 2 The facility will provide necessary respiratory care and services such as oxygen therapy, treatments, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy care and/or suctioning. 3 Tracheostomy care will be provided according…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) mask appropriately when providing trach suctioning for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1of 1 resident observed for tracheostomy suctioning (Resident #5) and failed to ensure PPE (including disposable gowns) was readily available for 9 out of 9 residents with tracheostomy and failed to have EBP signage on door for resident with trach and PEG tube (Resident #3). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions with an issued date of 04/01/24 included in part the following: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: a. Make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room. Note: face protection may also be needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient fluid intake and tube feeding to maintain proper hydration for 1 of 4 residents sampled for tube feeding (Resident #2). The findings included: Record review for Resident #2 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included in part the following: Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from Intracranial Artery, Osteomyelitis of Vertebra, Sacral and Sacrococcygeal Region. Review of the MDS for Resident #2 dated 11/02/24 documented in Section C a BIMS could not be conducted due to resident is rarely/never understood. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #2 revealed an order dated 07/02/24 for two times a day Auto water flush at 60 ml/hour x 20 hours (1200 ml total water). Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #2 reveled an order dated 09/19/24 for Enteral feed order two times a day Jevity 1.5 at 75 ml/hour x 20 hours via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and organized medical record for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #1). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure, Dependence on respiratory ventilator and Muscular Dystrophy. Physician orders included full code, tracheostomy (trach) care and to be on the ventilator at night. Resident #1 was able to breathe without the ventilator during the day with oxygen at 3 liters per minute. Review of the medical record revealed from [DATE]-[DATE] the resident was using oxygen 3 liters per minute during the day and on the ventilator at night. On [DATE] at 8:42 AM, a nursing progress note was written as a late entry. The note stated Resident was found to be unresponsive by RT (Respiratory Therapist) approximately 5:50 AM. Code blue called, CPR initiated, HR (heart rate) diminished at 42, 911 called at 6 AM. 911…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that ponteitiall effected 75 of the facility's residents. The findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 02/11/24 at 8:45 AM, there was no dietary supervisor present. The following were noted during the tour: a) Numerous small black flying insects noted to be in the food preparation and serving area. (b) Upon entering the kitchen it was noted a 1/3 steam table pan of pureed vegetables (10 portions) and 1/3 steam table pan of pureed beef sitting out at room temperature. The breakfast [NAME] (Staff A) stated that the pans included pureed mixed vegetables and pureed ground beef which were prepared earlier in the morning. At the request of the surveyor the temperature of the foods were tested using the facility's calibrated digital food thermometer. The temperatures were recorded as follows: pureed beef 110 degrees F and pureed vegetables 108 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services to maintain a clean, sanitary and home like environment for 17 of 29 rooms on the Hibiscus unit (Rooms #100 to 128), 6 of 17 rooms on the Dolphin Unit (Rooms #200 to 222), 3 of 3 unit corridors and the common areas that included the Activities/Dining area, lobby/reception area, the laundry, and corridors leading to the units from the lobby/reception area. The findings included: 1). During the Environment Tour conducted on the Hibiscus Unit (rooms 100 to 128), on 02/13/24 at 2:15 PM, accompanied with the Director of Maintenance, the following were noted: room [ROOM NUMBER]: The floor area surrounding the room entry door and throughout the room were noted to be black stained and heavily soiled with dust, dirt, and debris. Small hole (2 diameter) in wall above Bed-A. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The exterior of the room entry door was in disrepair. Room floor and base boards were soiled and stained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure reasonable efforts to accommodate individual food preferences, dietary needs, and food quality related complaints for 9 sampled residents that include: Resident's #22, #32, #39, #46, #49, #51, #56, #57, #66, and one resident who requested to stay anonymous. The findings included: 1) During the screening of Resident #39 on 02/11/24 at 10:15 AM, the alert and oriented resident was noted to state that the facility menu is either not posted to view or the posted menu is not followed on a regular basis. The resident further stated he was given the phone number of the kitchen to call food food requests or food issues, however he always gets the answering machine and leaves messages that are never returned. Further stated that he never is served food preferences and is sent food that the quality is terrible and does not eat the meals. On 02/13/24 at 9 AM Resident #39 interviewed again concerning his meal issues and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to honor a residents choices for being out of bed for 2 of 4 residents sampled for choices (Residents #37 and Resident #56); failed to honor resident's choice for eating in the Dining room for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for choices (Resident #56, Resident #22, and a resident that wished to remain anonymous); and failed to honor residents choices for showers for 1 of 4 residents sampled for choices (Resident #38). The findings included: 1a). Resident #56 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], According to a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], Resident #56 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was 'cognitively intact'. The MDS documented that the resident was dependent upon staff for ADLs except for eating. Resident 356's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Hemiplegia, Seizure disorder, Anxiety disorder, Depression, Epilepsy. Resident #56's care plan, initiated on 02/11/24, documented, Resident has indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify representative for change of condition for 1 of 4 residents sampled for hospitalizations (Resident #9) and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #12). The findings included: 1. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was moderately cognitively intact. A progress note dated 01/17/24 at 1:13 PM documented the resident was confused and not oriented. The physician/nurse practitioner was called and was in the facility to assess the resident. An order was received to transfer Resident #9 to the hospital for altered mental status for evaluation. Resident #9 was transferred from the facility at 2:50 PM. Further record review did not reveal the resident's representative was notified of the resident's change in condition. 2. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was mildly cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to close privacy curtain during wound care for 1 of 2 residents sampled for wound care (Resident #20); and failed to provide privacy during medication administration for 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration (Resident #4). The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights- Exercise of Rights with a revised date of 03/02/19 included the following: The facility will treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Each resident will be treated with dignity and respect. 1) Record review for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included: Anoxic Brain Damage, Tracheostomy Status, Other Involuntary Movements, and Unspecified Voice and Resonance. Review of the Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that 1 (Resident #79) of 10 sampled residents for nutrition review failed to be given the appropriate treatment of supervision and adaptive eating equipment with meals to maintain or improve ability to eat independently. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal conducted on 02/11/24 at 12:15 PM, it was noted that the lunch tray was placed in front of resident and staff left room. It was noted that the tray foods were served in bowls and only 1 built-up spoon and regular spoon, fork, and knife were provided on the tray. The resident was noted to have visual impairment and some cognitive impairment. The resident was noted to attempt to eat the foods with the regular spoon but ate with the spoon upside down. The resident was noted to utilize the built -up spoon only for a few attempts with the foods in bowls. Staff were noted not to assist or supervise Resident #79 during the meal, and the resident consumed less than 20 %…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide 1 (Resident #19) of 10 sampled residents who are unable to carry out activities receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition. The findings included: During resident screenings conducted on 02/11/24 at 10 AM it was noted that Resident #19 appeared underweight/malnourished and was cognitively impaired. Observation conducted on 02/13/24 at 8:30 AM noted regular meal tray served to the room of Resident #19. Staff was noted to only set up the tray in front of the resident and then staff left room. Resident noted to be cognitively impaired and could not eat independently and required supervision and assistance with eating. During the 30 minute observation no staff were noted to enter the room and provide assistance with Resident #19. Resident was noted to consume 0% of the breakfast meal. At 8:45 AM the resident was noted to be sleeping in front of the meal tray and staff were noted to remove the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing activities program for 4 of 4 residents, Residents #56, 22, 37, and a resident that wishes to remain anonymous. The findings included: The Admissions packet documented, the Activity Department at Avante offers a variety in both group and individual programs designed to meet the needs and interests of our residents. Participation is encouraged but not mandatory. We encourage our residents to continue to do things they have enjoyed in the past, as well as trying new opportunities. Suggestions for programs are welcome and your involvement is encouraged. Programs such as arts and crafts, physical activities, religious programs, bingo, discussion groups, and current events are offered on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. The facility's policy, 'Activities Meet Interest/Needs of Each Resident', with an issue date of 03/02/19 documented, The facility will provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to ensure that 1 (Resident #31) of 2 sampled residents for dialysis review with meals prior to leaving for dialysis appointments and bagged lunches to take to dialysis treatment appointments; failed to provide 1 (Resident #98) of 2 sampled residents with physician ordered pain medication; and failed to provide a consult for 1 (Resident #48) of 2 residents reviewed for physician ordered dermatology consults. The findings included: 1) During the screening and interview conducted with Resident #31 on 02/12/24 at 8:15 AM, it was noted that she was located in the hallway and stated to the surveyor that the dialysis transport will be at the facility soon to take her to dialysis. Resident #31 further stated that she would be leaving for dialysis transport at 8:30 AM and had not eaten the breakfast meal and she would like to eat her breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored in a manner to prevent infection for 2 out of 3 sampled residents for respiratory care (Residents #155 and #60). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nebulizer Equipment Storage with a revised date of 02/2019 included: It will be the standard of this facility that nebulizer equipment will be stored according to current best practice guidelines. Between uses store nebulizer parts in a dry, clean plastic storage bag. 1) Record review for Resident #155 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #155 dated12/19/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating a cognitive response. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #155 revealed an order dated 12/20/23 for Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) mg/3ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #31) of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis did not receive services consistent with professional standards of practice that included ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services. The findings included: During the Dialysis review for Resident #31 on 02/13/24, it was noted that there was no evidence, written or computer, of communication with the dialysis center after each session. A request was made by the surveyor to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/13/24 for documentation of communication for all dialysis sessions concerning Resident #31. On 02/13/24 the DON informed the surveyor that the written documentation that was normally kept in a binder at the facility at the 100 Wing Nursing Station was missing. A review of the clinical record of Resident #31 noted that the resident had a current MDS BIMS score of 14. Further review noted diagnoses of Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to accommodate resident's choices for being out of bed, to accommodate residents' participation in activities, and choices for having meals in the dining room. The insufficient staffing has the potential to affect all residents in the facility, including Residents #22, 56, 37 and a resident who wished to remain anonymous. The census at the time of the survey was 108 residents. 1). The Facility Assessment, most recently updated on 01/30/24, did not address the staffing needs to provide activities based on the facility census and the acuity of the residents being provided care. A review of the Activities Calendar for the month of February 2024 revealed the following: Each Sunday, the only activity is Bible Study at 2:45 PM. Each Thursday, the only activities are 'Biggest Loser' at 1:15 PM and Bingo at 2:30 PM. Each Saturday the only activities are Morning News and word search puzzles that are kept at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify medications that were not supposed to be crushed for a resident with a PEG tube for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #18). The findings included: Record review for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission date of 05/11/23 with diagnosis of Gastrostomy Status. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #18 dated 12/23/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status was not conducted due to the resident is rarely/never understood. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #18 revealed an order dated 04/05/23 for Flomax oral capsule 0.4mg (Tamsulosin HCL) give 0.4 mg via PEG tube at bedtime. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #18 revealed an order dated 05/30/23 for Linzess oral capsule 290mcg give 290 mcg via PEG tube one time daily. Review of the Pharmacy Consultation Report for Resident #18 was as follows:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5% or greater. The medication error rate was 10%, 3 medication errors were identified while observing a total of 30 opportunities, affecting Residents #4 and #60. The findings included: 1) Record review for Resident #4 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Anoxic Brain Damage, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, and Tracheostomy Status. On 02/11/24 at 9:48 AM an observation was made of Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), performing medication administration for Resident #4. The nurse obtained a blood pressure reading for the resident of 99/63. The nurse stated she was holding the following medications due to the low blood pressure: Amlodipine Besylate 10mg and Lasix (Furosemide) 20mg. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #4 revealed an order dated 01/12/24 for Amlodipine Besylate oral tablet 10mg give 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility's approved menu was not prepared in advance and not followed and not reviewed by the facility's dietitian or other qualified nutrition professional, for potentially 75 facility residents. The findings included: 1) During the review of the approved menu for the lunch meal of 02/11/24 it was noted that the menu for Regular, Therapeutic, and Mechanically Altered Diets included: Apple Pork Chops Onion Roasted Potatoes Dill Carrots Roll Pineapple Chunks During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 02/11/24 at 9 AM, it was noted that the Cook, Staff E, was preparing canned Beef Ravioli , Carrots, and Pears Halves. The surveyor requested Staff E to provide a copy of the approved lunch menu and replied that she did not have a copy of the approved lunch menu. Staff E provided the surveyor a menu that she stated was left for her by the Food Service Director to prepare for the lunch meal that only included; Ravioli, Vegetable Blend , Garlic Bread, and Pears. The menu did not document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined facility foods were not palatable and not prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for potentially 75 of 75 of the facility's residents. The findings included: 1) During the observation of the lunch meal of 02/11/24 at 10 AM in the main kitchen, it was noted that the approved lunch menu of Pork Chops, Dilled Carrots, Onion Roasted Potatoes, and Pineapple Chunks would be substituted with Beef Ravioli, Cooked Carrots, Tomato Soup, and Pears. During the meal service conducted in the main kitchen on 02/11/24 at 11:45 AM, it was noted that the meal was not appetizing/appealing due to orange color from the Ravioli (tomato sauce) , Carrots, and Tomato Soup. Interview conducted with the lunch [NAME] (Staff E) at the time of the meal observation, and she stated that she was not given a menu to follow for the lunch meal and was unaware of how unappetizing the meal appearance was. A review of the facility's Standardized Recipe for the preparation of Cheese Ravioli noted that the ingredients…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare pureed foods in a consistency designed to meet the needs of 6 (includes Resident #12) physician ordered pureed diets. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 02/13/24 at 11:30 AM, it was noted that the approved menu documented pureed Turkey Goulash and pureed Cauliflower (sub Capri Vegetables). Observation of the tray assembly line noted visible pieces of Turkey were in the Turkey Goulash and visible pieces of vegetables were in the pureed Capri Vegetables. A taste test of the entrée and vegetables conducted by the surveyor and the Lunch [NAME] (Staff F) confirmed pieces of turkey and vegetables in the pureed mixtures. Interview conducted with Staff F at the time of the observation noted that he does not taste test pureed foods to ensure that the pureed mixture is smooth in consistency. Also noted that Staff F was not aware that dysphagia pureed foods must be smooth in consistency when there is a diagnoses of Dysphagia. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for 2 of 34 residents in the final sample (Residents #29 and #92). The findings included: Review of the Frequently Asked Questions About a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO) located at https://www.floridahealth.gov/licensing-and-regulation/trauma-system/_documents/dnro-faq.pdf included: Does it have to be notarized or witnessed? No, the form is simply signed by the patient, health care surrogate or health care proxy as defined in section 765.202, Florida Statutes, and the patient's physician. This is a physician's order. 1.) Record review for Resident #29 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with most recent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Multiple Sclerosis, Tracheostomy Status, Gastrostomy Status, Paraplegia, and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #29 dated 01/25/24 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications in a safe and sanitary environment for 1 of 4 residents observed for medication pass (Resident #4); failed to ensure medications are stored in a sanitary manner for 1 of 4 medication carts; failed to provide wound care in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 residents sampled for wound care (Resident #20); and failed to provide care for laceration in a sanitary manner for 1 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #31). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control-Hand Hygiene with a revised date of 03/02/19 included: It is the policy of the facility to perform hand hygiene in accordance with national standards from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. Soap and water are required for hand hygiene when hands are visibly soiled, after caring for resident with diarrheal infection such as C difficile, after potential exposure to body fluid, before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a low air loss mattress was functioning for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for wound care (Resident #20). The findings included: On 02/11/24 at 12:03 PM, during a tour of the facility, the air mattress on the bed for Resident #20 was observed off. The pump was not lit and the mattress was not firm (photographic evidence obtained). The resident was asked if the mattress felt different and he stated that it felt a little lower on one side. The sheets were not fitted on the bed and the resident was lying on the actual mattress in some areas. Resident #20 currently has a Stage 3 wound to his left hip. Discussed this observation with the wound care nurse, Staff K, on 02/13/24 at 11:30 AM. Staff K stated she checks all of the air mattresses Monday thru Friday when she is at the facility and was unsure who checks them on the weekends.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate wound care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed, who were admitted with wounds (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and was admitted with two stage 3 pressure ulcers. A review of Resident #1's orders revealed an order dated 12/22/23 for wound care consult for wounds to head, left knee, right anterior leg, elbow, and abdomen. Further review of Resident #1's orders revealed orders for wound care dated 12/26/23. A progress note dated 12/26/23 at 2:07 PM documented: Second skin assessment completed by wound care nurse. Findings are head/scalp open surgical wound, red in color; right knee open pressure injury red in color; left knee open pressure injury, right thigh/hip area open area pressure injury, this is deep, red in color; right abdomen open wound red color; and right elbow outer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #2). The findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube). A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required tube feedings for nutritional support. Resident #2 was care planned for nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to dependent on tube feedings for all nutritional needs and with increased nutritional needs. Interventions included Registered Dietictian (RD) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed. A review of Resident #2's orders revealed an order dated 10/12/23 for TF diabetasource 55 milliliters an hour (ml/hr), goal rate 100 ml/hr times 20 hours. Titrate up to 20 ml/hr every eight hours to go rate. H2O (water) flushes 40 ml/hr. A nutritional evaluation progress note dated 10/12/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to medicate a resident for pain as ordered for 1 of 4 resident reviewed for pain (Resident #1). The findings included: A telephone interview was conducted with Resident #1's representative on 01/09/24. The representative stated the resident was admitted to the facility with a wound on the right side of head and right hip. The resident had asked for pain medication and was told by the nurse they could not give any pain medication because it was not on hand. Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was cognitively intact and required partial assist with activities of daily living. Resident #1 was care planned for alteration in comfort related to low back pain. Interventions included follow up with resident after medicating for pain to evaluate effectiveness of pain control, medicate as ordered, and notify physician if pain control is ineffective. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Facility Policy, observation, record review and interview the facility failed to initiate isolation precautions for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (Resident #293, #298 , #68 and #82), failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a sanitary manner for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care (Resident#26, #28, #71 and #296), and failed to maintain suction equipment in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for suctioning (Resident #50). The findings included: Facility Policy titled Infection Control- Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions dated 03/02/19 documented, It is the policy of the facility to ensure that appropriate infection prevention and control measures are taken to prevent the spread of communicable disease and infection in accordance with State and Federal Regulations, and national guidelines; Transmission-based precautions are applied presumptively or upon first suspicion that a resident may have and infection that requires transmission-based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review and interview the facility failed to follow physician's orders for diagnostic tests in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #71 and Resident #298). The findings included: Facility Policy titled Diagnostic Services documented, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that laboratory, radiology, and other diagnostic services meet the needs of residents, that results are reported promptly to the ordering provider to address potential concerns and for disease prevention, provide for resident assessment, diagnosis, and treatment, and that the facility has established policies and procedures, and is responsible for the quality and timeliness of services whether services are provided by the facility or an outside resource. Facility Policy titled Tuberculosis Screening dated August 2013 documented, The facility will administer and interpret tuberculin skin tests (TST) in accordance with recognized guidelines and pertinent regulations. A qualified nurse of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure resident safety (Resident #20 and #89) and failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents and adequate evaluations post fall (Resident #71) for three of four residents reviewed. Findings included: 1) Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a stroke which required removal of the right side of his skull due to swelling. He has left sided paralysis, a seizure disorder, heart failure, a tracheostomy and is unable to speak. Due to the lack of skull bone to protect his brain, a protective helmet should be worn as was physician ordered. The most recent MDS assessment from 07/12/22 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15 (no cognitive decline). The resident is bed bound and is totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. He communicates with his hands, head movement and a simple electronic device that he can write on. In November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, records review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow Physicians' orders to ensure 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #143) received a dietary supplement. The findings included: On 10/05/22 at 09:48 AM, Resident #143 was observed in bed; he looked very frail. Resident # 143 spoke Spanish and was incoherent in his speech. The clinical record showed that Resident #143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses are: Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Difficulty In Walking, Not Elsewhere Classified Other Pancytopenia; Pneumonia, Unspecified Organism; Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance; Psychotic Disturbance; Mood Disturbance, And Anxiety; Dysphagia, Oropharyngeal Phase; Other Toxic Encephalopathy, Acute Neurologic Post Covid-19 Condition, Other Asthma; Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Without Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Personal History Of Covid-19;Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of the Dietary assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication as physician ordered for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #18). The resident missed seven doeses, and there were discrepancies in the documentation. The findings included On 10/04/22 at 10:09 AM, Resident #18 was interviewed. The resident stated, I haven't had my pain medication in three days, if it's charted as given it's a lie. Resident #18 was initially admitted to this facility on 03/14/2020. The most recent comprehensive assessment showed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15/15 which indicated no cognitive decline or memory loss. The resident's care plan notes and intervention to Administer medications as per MD orders. Review of the current physician orders revealed an order for Percocet 10-325 mg, one tablet, every eight hours for pain which started on 06/01/22. Review of the September MAR (Medication Administration Record) recorded only one of the 90 doses for the month was held. For the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-07 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Facility Policy, observation, record review and interview the facility failed to have a physician's order for oxygen administration for 2 of 7 Residents reviewed for oxygen administration (Resident #71 and Resident #296) The findings included: Facility Policy titled Oxygen Administration dated 03/02/19 documented, Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, except in the case of an emergency. 1. On 10/04/22 at 12:51 PM Resident #296 was observed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 3 liters per minute. On 10/05/22 at 08:22 AM Resident #296 was observed wearing oxygen via nasal cannula at a rate of 3 liters per minute. Resident #296 stated he has the oxygen on all the time. Photographic evidence taken. Record review of Resident #296 documented an admission date of 09/26/22 with diagnoses that included Heart Disease, Malignant Cancer, and Diabetes. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #296 as cognitively intact requiring extensive assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner, with the potential to affect all residents. Finding included: On 10/04/22 at 9:35AM conducted an initial tour in the main kitchen accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The following was observed: (1) The oven was stained with grease and food. (2) The pot on the stove had black burnt on food. (3) The stove was very greasy. (4) The tray under the burner of the stove was built up with dried burnt food. (5) The walk in Freezer door has black stains. (6) The Floor in front of the walk in freezer was black. (7) The toaster was rusted and dirty. On 10/06/22 at 11:50 AM, conducted a follow up tour of the main kitchen for the lunch meal. The temperatures of two 8oz container of regular milk in a ice bath on the tray line, were 46 .6 and 46.8 degrees. On 10/7/22 at 1:20PM, conducted an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager and the Regional Dietary Manager, and and they were informed of the findings.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-10-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a certified nursing assistant was included in the care plan development process, for 6 of 26 residents reviewed for care plan conference (Residents 14, 17, 25, 46, 52, and 85). Finding Include: On 10/06/22 at 11:00 AM, the electronic medical records (EMR) for Residents #14, 17, 25, 46, 52, and 85, were reviewed. It was noted there was no documentation found that the certified nursing assistant (CNA) participated in the development of the residents care plan. On 10/06/22 at 1:00 pm, an interview was conducted with the MDS Nurse, she was asked to provide evidence of the (CNA) participation in the care plan development process. She stated there was no documentation that the certified nursing assistant participated.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,275 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $10,364 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
  • $13,764 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
  • $4,147 — penalty dated 2025-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVANTE CENTERS — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.1-1.1 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AG HOLDINGS, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/22/1990
DEBBIE KLURMAN 1994 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 06/20/1989
DEENA KLURMAN KRANZ 2000 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 06/20/1989
MONA MIZRACHI 1994 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 06/20/1989
SISEL KLURMAN 2001 REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 04/09/2010
BIEGASIEWICZ, KIMBERLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/04/2022
HORNACK, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/24/2019
CHOPRA, SHAWNIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2026
THOMAS, ANTONIOIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 10%Other / private 18%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,621per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$346per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105372. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next