No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Belleair Health Care Center

1150 Ponce De Leon Blvd, Clearwater, FL 33756 · For profit - Partnership · 120 certified beds · (727) 585-5491 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (727) 585-5491 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1016 Ponce de Leon Blvd · (727) 584-2131 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
1604 S Missouri Ave · (727) 586-4414 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1646 Tilley Ave · (813) 697-4747 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Woodlawn St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.9%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.3%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.8%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.4%10.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.4%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.672.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.061.151.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 442 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.86U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.44hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 208 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.86 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.7%CMS range 48.0–55.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.5–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.6–8.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
64.8%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.449 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident (#93) of two residents sampled for nutrition.Findings include: On 08/12/25 at 2:25 PM an observation was made of Resident #93. The resident was observed with a pink NPO (nothing by mouth) wrist band to right wrist and was noted to be drinking from a cup at the bedside. Resident #93 said family had provided the cup, and he was aware he was not supposed to be drinking from it, but he was thirsty.Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed a physician's order dated 07/27/25 and no end date for NPO diet, NPO texture, NPO consistency.Review of Resident #93's care plan with a revision date of 07/15/25 revealed [Resident #93] has a swallowing problem r/t [related to] oral cancer, and dysphagia [difficulty swallowing]. The goal revealed [Resident #93] will not have injury related to aspiration through the review date. The interventions revealed, Diet to be followed as prescribed. Encourage resident to eat in an upright position,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate wound care by not following professional standards of care for one resident (#87) of three residents sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions.Findings included: On 08/12/25 at 1:45 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #87, who said he was here at the facility due to a wound on the right foot that became infected prior to admission to the facility. Observation of the resident's right foot revealed the right foot was covered in a gauze dressing and dated 08/12/25. Resident #87 said the dressing had been changed earlier today.An observation was conducted on 08/13/25 at 12:00 PM of Resident #87's right foot covered in a gauze dressing dated 08/13/25. Review of Resident #87's electronic medical record revealed a wound care physician order dated 07/29/25 for wound care-right hallux/plantar-apply collagen then apply calcium alginate-wrap with (gauze) and then (self-adherent bandage) daily and as needed. The physician order for the right heel dated 07/30/25 revealed wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure splints were applied according to physician orders for one resident (#14) out of one resident reviewed for splints.Findings included: An observation was conducted on 08/12/2025 at 1:52 PM. Resident #14 was lying in bed asleep with covers up to neck with both hands exposed. Resident #14 was observed to have a right-hand contracture with no splint in place. An observation was conducted on 08/14/2025 at 9:43 AM. Resident #14 was in bed watching television. The right hand was contracted with no splint or washcloth in place. Review of Resident #14's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/13/25 Restorative Nursing for splinting. Pt [patient] to tolerate R [right] palm guard with finger separators and rolled towel placed in elbow crease on 24 hours with removal for skin checks and hygiene.Review of Resident #14's Therapy Comprehensive Screen with an effective date of 8/11/25 revealed Resident #14 had current orders for adaptive equipment/device/splint/brace. The type of adaptive equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide proper storage of medications for two residents (#93 and #11) of 38 sampled residents. Findings included: On 8/12/25 at 2:33 PM an observation was made of a bottle of “Dakin's Solution quarter strength” (a pharmacy grade bleach solution to treat wounds) was noted on Resident #93's dresser in his room. On 08/13/25 at 1:13 PM an observation was made of Resident's #93's dresser and revealed the bottle of “Dakin's Solution” was still present in the resident's room. On 08/13/25 at 1:14 PM an interview was conducted with Nurse F, a Licensed Practical Nurse who confirmed that the bottle of “Dakin's Solution” should not be kept on the resident's dresser in the room but should be stored on the treatment cart. Nurse F then removed the bottle from the resident's room. On 08/13/25 at 1:15 PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON said it was her expectation treatment supplies and medications were to be stored on the treatment cart and secured. 2. On 08/12/25 at 9:02 AM a container of Desitin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practice during wound care for one resident (#87) of three residents sampled for non-pressure related skin conditions.Findings included:On 08/12/25 at 1:45 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #87, who said he was here at the facility due to a wound on the right foot that became infected prior to admission to the facility. Observation of the resident's right foot revealed the right foot was covered in a gauze dressing and dated 08/12/25. Resident #87 said the dressing had been changed earlier today.An observation was conducted on 08/13/25 at 12:00 PM of Resident #87's right foot covered in a gauze dressing dated 08/13/25. Review of Resident #87's electronic medical record revealed a physician order dated 07/29/25 for wound care-right hallux/plantar-apply collagen then apply calcium alginate-wrap with (gauze) and then (self-adherent bandage) daily and as needed. The physician order for the right heel dated 07/30/25 revealed wound care-right heel-cleanse with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate an effective response to grievances pertaining to care and life in the facility voiced by Resident Council. In addition, four (#6, #7, #8, and #5) of eleven sampled residents reported call bell light untimeliness response by staff. Findings included: A review of Resident Council meeting minutes for 05/2024, 06/2024, 07/22024, 08/2024, and 09/2024 was conducted on 09/23/2024. Review of the meeting minutes dated 05/16/2024, reflected Old Business concerns showed two room numbers beds not being made, 11-7 talking loud in hallway, not getting ice water 3-11. Further review of the meeting minutes reflected no response from the facility pertaining to the concerns. Review of the meeting minutes dated 06/11/2024, reflected no documentation of Old Business concerns. New Business concerns for nursing were listed, 400 hall call lights 11-7. Review of the meeting minutes dated 07/02/2024, reflected an Old Business concern, call lights 11-7. The meeting notes documented New Business concerns: call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a functioning grievance process for two (#3 and #5) of three sampled residents related to missing items. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #3's clinical chart, the face sheet reflected an admission of 10/22/2023 and a subsequent discharge of 11/03/2023 to another skilled nursing facility. On 09/23/2024 at 1:43 p.m., Resident #3's family member was interviewed by phone. He stated he had filed the grievance in October 2023 about a missing hearing aid. He said he was told by the nurse to fill it out. They were supposed to set up an appointment with the audiologist and they never followed up. I called the administrator several times. I left e-mails. We wanted to see if the audiologist would come to her new facility for the appointment. Four months later, we had no results. They never followed up with an appointment. We tried the grievance process. It did not work for us. We ended up buying her a new pair after waiting so long, she could not hear without them. We would like to be reimbursed. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to give the opportunity to choose activities of interest for one (Resident #322) of five residents sampled. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 10/4/2023 at 9:23 a.m. Resident #322 was heard from the hallway, crying loudly. Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) went into the resident's room and the Director of Nursing (DON) was observed to be standing outside of Resident #322's room. Staff B, LPN came out of the room and said to the DON, I think I have [Resident #322] calmed down. Resident #322 began to cry loudly again and Staff B, LPN said, Oh, I guess he's not calmed down. Resident #322 was observed to be on the phone crying saying, I need your help, I need you here. The DON instructed Staff B, LPN to get a psychiatric consult. An interview was conducted with Staff B, LPN on 10/4/2023 at 10:04 a.m. Staff B, LPN stated, we are getting him a psych consult, but I would hate to give him Ativan as Resident #322 has never acted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II upon a new qualifying mental health diagnosis for two (Residents #77, #32) of three residents sampled for PASARR Level II. Findings included: A review of Resident #77's admission record showed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was readmitted back to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, anxiety disorder, and major depression disorder. A review of Resident #77's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated 10/26/20 showed qualifying mental health diagnoses of anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and depressive disorder and no PASARR Level II was required. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section I, Active Diagnoses, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/28/2020, quarterly MDS with ARD of 7/30/23, 1/29/23, 7/31/22, and annual MDS with an ARD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #34) of thirty-eight sampled residents, who were reviewed for care planning, was care planned with problem areas, goals, and interventions. Findings included: On 10/2/2023 and 10/3/2023 during the 7:00 a.m.-3:00 p.m. shift, Resident #34 was visited several times while in her room. She was observed initially lying in bed and with her legs propped up on a pillow and positioned very close to the edge of the bed. Resident #34 was not presenting with any behaviors, pain or discomfort during each time visited. However, Resident #34's bilateral upper extremities appeared to be somewhat contracted, and/or with movement impairment. She was not wearing braces or splints on her extremities. There were no braces or splints in the room. Resident #34 was interviewable. She was very pleasant and happy to be visited. The resident said she could not move her fingers and at times had pain. She said her fingers had been that way since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of temperature recording logs and review of policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that cold Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) food was held at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below during the lunch meal service on 8/26/21. The affected food was intended to be served to 8 residents out of 104 residents who consumed the facility's prepared food. The findings included: On 08/26/21 at 12:06 PM, during the lunch meal service, there was a tray of approximately 17 individual butterscotch puddings held without ice or cooling device. The surveyor took the holding temperature of an individual butterscotch pudding from this tray, using the facility's thermocouple, and the temperature was 55 degrees F, rather than at 41 degrees F or below. Photographic evidence obtained. Butterscotch pudding is a TCS food. Interview with the Food Service Director (FSD) at that time revealed that the butterscotch pudding came from a can that was refrigerated overnight. During an interview on 08/26/21 at 12:07 PM with Dietary Aide, Staff H, she said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of thirty-four sampled residents (#54) was assessed for a wound. Findings included: On 8/24/2021 at 10:00 a.m. and at 12:15 p.m., Resident #54 was observed in her room, seated in a wheelchair with an unraveled dressing on her right lower leg. Two ends of the dressing were touching the floor and appeared blood stained. On 8/24/2021 at 12:15 p.m., Resident #54 confirmed she had a wound on her leg and that it itched at times which was why the bandage had unraveled. Resident #54 also reported that she had another area on her right arm that burned and itched as well. She was wearing long sleeves and proceeded to push up her right sleeve past her elbow. Observation revealed the right inner bend of the arm had a raised area approximately the size of a nickel. The area was deep red in color and appeared to be scabbed on the left side of the wound. A large rectangular bandage was observed pulled off and barely sticking on the lower part of the resident's arm. It appeared as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure that one of one (#319) sampled dialysis resident of two facility residents receiving dialysis received care consistent with professional standards of practice and the resident's plan of care. The facility failed to ensure communication with the dialysis facility in order to ensure antibiotics were provided in accordance with physician's orders for Resident #319. The findings included: Clinical record review for Resident # 319 revealed an admission record with an admission date of 08/16/21 with diagnoses to include: end-stage renal disease (ESRD), pneumonia, cellulitis unspecified, and acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot. A review of the most recent minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section N of the MDS documented that Resident # 319 received an antibiotic for five days since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications to include one tube of Anti-itch cream was properly stored and secured to ensure one (#54) of 34 sampled residents could not access it, during two (8/24/2021 and 8/25/2021) of four days observed. Findings included: On 8/24/2021 at 12:15 p.m., Resident #54 was observed in her room . She was noted with bandage dressing that was unraveled on her right lower leg. Upon interviewing Resident #54, she expressed that staff had put the dressing on and she does have itching in the area where the dressing was placed. During the interview, the surveyor observed a full 35 gram tube of Extra Strength Anti-Itch Cream, Ban-Itch topical analgesic and skin protectant on the resident's wall dresser. Resident #54 was asked where the tube of itch cream came from and she said that they gave it to her and she uses it when she needs it. Resident #54 could not remember a specific person who gave her the tube of cream, but did reported that it was from a nurse. She said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CLEAR CHOICE HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.8-1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SAMUEL B KELLET QTIP MRTL TROrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2003
SBK CAPITAL, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2003
CAPITAL FUNDING GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 04/09/2019
PARTEE, LESLIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2003
CLEAR CHOICE HEALTH CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2007
BACHA, MOUNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/21/2025
BUCKNER, GRANTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
KENNEDY, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 22%Other / private 22%

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$360per resident / day
operating cost
$10,951per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$371per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105636. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next