No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Port Charlotte Rehabilitation Center

25325 Rampart Blvd, Port Charlotte, FL 33948 · For profit - Partnership · 152 certified beds · (941) 629-7466 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$45,920 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $45,920 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-08)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
18316 Murdock Cir · (941) 629-3502 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1825 Tamiami Trl · (941) 624-0127 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1825 Tamiami Trl · (207) 874-7483 · Call to confirm hours
Park
18235 Avon Ave · (941) 627-1074 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
18305 Wintergarden Ave · (941) 743-5335

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.5%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.2%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.3%9.5%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.8%14.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.9%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.7%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.892.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.021.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 803 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.74U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.43hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 313 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.74 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 51.2–60.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.4%CMS range 12.3–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 4.4–8.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
39.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 147.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-19)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-25)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2026-05-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility's policies and procedures and staff interviews, the facility administration failed to provide effective oversight to ensure ongoing implementation of a water management program to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella (water-borne disease causing bacteria), and failed to minimize the risk of ongoing exposure to Legionella for 145 residents from potentially contaminated water sources, in response to a resident's confirmed diagnosis of Legionnaires' Disease (potentially fatal form of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria) that may have been acquired at the facility.The findings included:Refer to F880Review of the facility provided list of Key Facility Staff revealed:The Administrator's date of hire was 6/18/24.The Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist's date of hire was 6/24/24.The Maintenance Director's date of hire was 7/19/19.Review of the Administrator's job description revealed the position overview was, Responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and interviews, the facility failed to establish and implement a water management program to mitigate the risk of Legionella (waterborne disease-causing bacteria) exposure. The facility failed to minimize the risk of ongoing exposure to Legionella from potentially contaminated water sources in response to a resident's confirmed diagnosis of Legionnaire's disease (potentially fatal form of pneumonia caused by Legionella bacteria) that may have been acquired at the facility.The findings included:Refer to F835Review of the facility's Water Management Program (WMP) revealed, Legionnaires' disease is a serious type of pneumonia caused by bacteria called Legionella which live in water. Legionella can make people sick when they inhale contaminated water from building water systems that are not adequately maintained. Approximately 70% of building water systems are contaminated with Legionella bacteria. These bacteria thrive in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions, including adequate supervision to prevent falls for 2 (Residents #1 and #4) of 4 residents reviewed with multiple falls and/or fall related injuries. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 9/7/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, repeated falls, abnormalities of gait and mobility, severe dementia with other behavioral disturbances. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 9/9/24 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 03. Resident #1 required supervision to walk 10 feet and was independent to wheel herself 50 feet once seated in the wheelchair. Review of the care plan initiated on 9/15/23 and last reviewed on 10/14/24 revealed Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Dietary aide Staff N) of 1 staff observed operating the dishwasher was trained, and competent to test the sanitizing solution of the low temp dishwasher to ensure dishes were properly sanitized to prevent foodborne illnesses of residents consuming an oral diet. The findings included: The facility Dish Machine Overview purpose states to maintain proper use and function of dish machine. Number 6 states Perform chemical test strip procedure following the last cycle. Confirm the test strip color matches the manufacturers' recommendation of PPM (parts per million). If not, run dishes through machine again ensuring proper PPM met. On 12/16/24 at 9:15 a.m., the Initial kitchen tour was conducted with the Kitchen Manager. Dietary Aide Staff N was observed operating the dishwasher. The Kitchen Manager said the dishwasher was a low temp machine and required the use of a sanitizing agent. Staff N was unable to use a test strip to measure the concentration of the sanitizer. Using a translator, Staff N…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policy and procedure, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1 (Resident #59) of 4 dependent residents reviewed by failing to place the call system within reach of the resident. The findings included: The Facility policy Universal Fall Precautions purpose said Universal fall precautions revolve around keeping the patient's environment safe and comfortable. This included maintain call light within reach. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a target date of 11/25/24 revealed Resident #59's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13. The assessment noted the resident was dependent for wheelchair mobility. On 12/16/24 at 1:30 p.m., Resident #59 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. The call light was wrapped around the side rail of the bed behind the wheelchair, and not within the resident's reach. Photographic evidence obtained. In an interview during the observation, Resident #59 said she was not allowed to get up and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plans with resident centered interventions to ensure 1 (Resident #85 ) of 3 sampled residents reviewed achieved their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing. The findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an original admission date of 10/3/24 and readmissions on 10/16/24 and 11/13/24. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure. Review of the hospital record for 10/11/24, Resident #85 had a cardiac pacemaker. Review of the admission nursing evaluations dated 10/16/24 and 11/13/24 revealed documentation Resident #85 had a cardiac pacemaker. Review of Resident #85's care plans revealed there no care plan addressing the cardiac pacemaker. On 12/18/24 at 9:10 a.m., Resident #85 was observed in his room with family members visiting. In an interview the resident's daughter said her father had not seen the cardiologist for the past two years for a pacemaker check. She said she visits her father every day and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, resident and family interviews and review of facility policy and procedures the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #5, and #24) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, Supporting documented Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #5 was [AGE] years old with an admission date of 10/17/24 and diagnoses including fracture of lower end of right femur, muscle weakness, and need for assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, resident and family interviews and review of facility policy and procedures the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain continence for 1(Resident #5) and failed to maintain indwelling urinary catheters in a safe and sanitary manner for 2 (Resident #134 and #85) of 3 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence and urinary catheters. The findings included: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, Supporting documented Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including elimination (toileting). 1. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #5 was [AGE] years old with an admission date of 10/17/24 and diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to store CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) equipment in a sanitary manner for 3 (Resident #10, #70 and #14) of 3 resident's reviewed for respiratory care and sleep apnea. This had the potential to cause respiratory infections in compromised residents. The findings included: 1. During observations on 12/16/24 at 1:16 p.m., and 12/17/24 at 4:41 p.m., Resident #10 was noted with a CPAP machine and the mask that was uncovered and lying on top of the nightstand. Photographic evidence obtained. Review of Resident #10's clinical record revealed there was no physician order and no care instructions for the use of the CPAP machine. 2. On 12/16/24 at 1:10 p.m., Resident #70 was observed with a CPAP machine in her room on the bedside table. The mask was uncovered and lying on the table next a cup of liquid and the machine had food and personal items stored next to it. The resident said the staff take care of the CPAP machine for her.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident records review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflects resident's oral status to identify dental care needs for 1 (Resident #123) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment. The findings included: The Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (RAI version 3.0) noted the steps for assessment for dental status included, Conduct exam of the resident's lips and oral cavity with dentures or partials removed if applicable. Use a light source that is adequate to visualize the back of the mouth. Check for abnormal mouth tissue, abnormal teeth, or inflamed or bleeding gums. The assessor should use his or her gloved fingers to adequately feel for masses or loose teeth. Review of the clinical record for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 3/29/22. The admission MDS with an assessment reference date of 4/7/22 noted the resident had, obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility guidelines manual, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #121) of 27 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The findings included: The facility Clinical/Rehabilitation Guidelines Manual, ADL Care, specified: Proper ADL care is vital to all residents within our center. To ensure that the process and expectations of ADL care are clear, consistently assessed in order to maintain compliance. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #121 had an admission date of 2/9/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction with left hemiparesis (weakness), blind in right eye and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) (standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) with an assessment reference date of 2/16/23 documented Resident #121 required extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene and required the assistance of two for bathing. The MDS noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #144) of 2 sampled residents receiving intravenous medications. The findings included: The facility policy for Catheter Insertion and Care (Midline Dressing Changes) noted Midline catheter dressings will be changed at specified intervals, or when needed, to prevent catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened, or soiled catheter-site dressings. General Guidelines included changing the midline catheter dressing 24 hours after catheter insertion, every 5-7 days, or if it is wet, dirty, not intact or compromised in any way. Review of the clinical record for Resident #144 revealed an admission date to the facility of 4/27/23. The resident was transferred to the hospital on 5/9/23, returned to the facility on 5/12/23. On 5/14/23 Resident #144 was transferred to an acute care hospital with return anticipated. On 5/16/23 Resident #144 returned to the facility. Review of the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement individualized care planned interventions to address the behavioral health needs of 1 (Resident #135) of 2 residents reviewed for behavioral health. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #135 had an admission date to the facility of 11/22/22. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 11/28/22 listed diagnoses including depression, and dementia. The resident's cognition was moderately impaired as indicated by a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 11. Resident #135 was able to be interviewed. The resident indicated it was very important for her to have books, newspapers, magazines to read, listen to music she likes, keep up with the news, do things with groups of people, go outside, and get fresh air when the weather is good, participate in religious services or practices. The assessment noted it was very important for the resident to do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of facility policy and procedure, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1(Resident #62) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration received the physician ordered intravenous antibiotic without unnecessary interruption to treat an infection in a surgical wound. The findings included: The facility policy Medication Administration General Guidelines (revised 8/2014) documented, Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. The facility has sufficient staff and a medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications without unnecessary interruptions. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . Medications are administered within 60 minutes of scheduled time . Unless otherwise specified by the prescriber, routine medications are administered according to the established medication administration schedule for the facility . Review of the clinical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to provide timely assistance with referrals for outside oral surgery services to meet the needs of 1(Resident #123) of 3 residents reviewed for dental services. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Social Services release date 11/15/2005 which states, General services, which social service department may assist, oversee, or manage, could include . Making referrals for and obtaining services from outside resource. Review of the progress notes in the clinical record for Resident #123 revealed: On 8/18/22 a dental progress note documented fracture of tooth #29 and severe nonrestorative decay with recommended extraction on teeth #2, 3, 8, 9, and 10. On 1/31/23 a dental progress note documented fractured teeth including #3, 7, 8, 9, 10, with recommendation to extract teeth #2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 20. A dental specialist referral form dated 3/10/23 documented recommended extraction of teeth #2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15. The referral noted to call the dental insurance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, policy review, staff, resident, and family interviews, the facility failed to ensure 7 (Resident #261, #31, #63, #49, #67, #257, and #8) of 10 residents reviewed for accidents were assessed for alternative interventions prior to the use of bed rails or if an alternative was identified, why the alternative failed to meet the resident's need. In addition, the facility failed to have ongoing routine maintenance of the bed rails in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. The findings included: The facility's Safe and Effective Use of Bed Rails policy dated 2018 indicated, To prevent entrapment and other safety hazards associated with bed rail use, the facility must attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail. If a side or bed rail is used, the facility must ensure correct installation, use and maintenance of bed rails, including but not limited to the following: assess the resident for risk of entrapment from the bed rails prior to installation. 1. On 9/27/21 at 12:23 p.m., Resident #31's bed was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain grooming and hygiene for 3 (Resident #17, #63, and #101) of 3 dependent residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living. This has the potential to cause psychological harm to the resident. The findings included: A review of the facility policy, CCHC 0608 Fingernail Care specified, Purpose. To promote circulation to the hands. To clean fingernails. 1. A review of Resident #63' s clinical record revealed a care plan specifying Resident #63 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set with a date of 8/26/21 documented Resident #63 required extensive assistance of one person with hygiene. Resident #63 had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance. On 9/27/21 at 11:03 a.m., Resident #63's fingernails were observed extending over 1/2 inch from the tip with a large amount of brown substance under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$45,920 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $45,920 — penalty dated 2025-05-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CLEAR CHOICE HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SAMUEL B KELLET QTIP MRTL TROrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2003
CAPITAL FUNDING GROUP, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 02/14/2022
KENNEDY, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2003
PARTEE, LESLIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2022
CLEAR CHOICE HEALTH CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2007
LESSIG, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2023
RODRIGUEZ MARTIN, ARTUROIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/27/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 31%Other / private 21%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$416per resident / day
operating cost
$12,653per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$398per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105524. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next