No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

East Bay Rehabilitation Center

4470 E Bay Dr, Clearwater, FL 33764 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (727) 530-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (727) 530-7100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 12 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
4625 E Bay Dr Ste 301 · (727) 804-6579 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4625 E Bay Dr Ste 313 · (844) 557-0835 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4445 E Bay Dr Ste 304 · (727) 531-0747 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4630 E Bay Dr · (727) 586-7415 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4625 E Bay Dr Ste 308 · (727) 536-5263

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.2%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.2%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.3%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.9%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.2%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.632.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 378 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 204 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.3%CMS range 40.6–51.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.0%CMS range 10.5–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge71.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 4.4–8.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
44.8%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-02-15)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2021-11-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, sanitary and maintained kitchen space to include: 1. Broken/missing trash receptacles at two of two hand washing stations; 2. A walk in freezer unit observed with heavy frosting crystallization on food items, shelving, and boxes of food items; 3. Overhead ceiling vents and ceiling tiles located above food prep and food service stations with dust and debris, 4. Various rusted areas near washed/sanitized cups and eating ware; and 5. Staff not wearing hair/beard covers appropriately while at food preparation and food service stations during three of four days observed, (2/12/2024, 2/13/2024, 2/14/2024). Findings included: 1. On 2/12/2024 at 9:07 a.m., the facility's kitchen was entered and toured with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The hand washing sink was in a room next to the dish washing machine. The CDM stated he had only been back at the facility for two weeks, but has been employed at the facility about four years. A foot pedal operated trash receptacle was positioned at the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions in the comprehensive care plan one resident (#90) of three resident sampled. Findings included: A review of the admission record showed Resident #90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including disorder of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, adult failure to thrive, cachexia (unintentional weight loss), and abnormal weight loss. A review of the active orders, as of February 2024, showed the following: -Bilateral heel elevation boots when in bed every shift. Remove for skin checks, hygiene and all cares as needed. Start date 4/5/23. A review of Resident #90's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed the following: -Section C-Cognitive Patterns: Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. -Section M M1200-Skin Conditions: requires pressure relieving devices while in bed and requires substantial/ maximal assistance (helper does more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#98), who was dependent on staff for eating assistance, received eating assistance in a manor to promote a safe and comfortable eating experience out of forty-seven sampled residents during one observed meal (12/12/2024) of one meal observed. Findings included: On 2/12/2024 at 11:55 a.m. an observation in the main dining room during the lunch meal was conducted. There were two sections of the dining room. A large section with ten tables where residents who dine and eat without eating assistance, and a smaller section with six tables where residents were assisted with their meals. Residents who dine in the small assistive dining room, require forms of assistance to include cueing, supervision or assistance with eating activities. Resident #158 was observed seated in a wheelchair at a table along with Resident #98, who was lying back in a reclined Geri chair. Resident #98 was observed with sheets covering her entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care and services related to wound care for one resident (#88) out of 5 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of Resident #88's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included weakness, altered mental status, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, and a history of falling. An observation was conducted on 02/12/24 at 10:02 AM. Resident #88 was observed to have a bandage on his right shin which was not dated and was soiled with brownish yellowish drainage. Resident #88 said the bandage had been changed a few days ago. He said he can't remember how he got the wound. (Photographic evidence obtained) An interview was conducted on 02/12/24 at 12:28 PM with Resident #88's family member. The family said Resident #88 gets skin tears very easily. The family member said he was at the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1) Medication pill splitters were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner in two of four medication carts, and 2) discontinued resident medications were disposed of within thirty days in two of two medication rooms. Findings included: On [DATE] beginning at 8:10 a.m. the Medication Storage facility task was conducted with Staff J, LPN Unit Manager, (LPM, UM). The following observations were noted: -In two of the facility's two medication storage rooms resident medications were stores in cardboard boxes labeled personal (Photographic Evidence Obtained). The boxes contained medication containers without a resident's name or the contents. -A clear amber pill bottle without a resident's name and the word Pepcid written on the lid, contained three different pill shapes and sizes (a capsule, a white round tablet, a white oblong tablet). (Photographic Evidence Obtained). - A three-section amber pill organizer was also in the box.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to hand hygiene during two of six medication administration observations. Findings Included: On 2/13 /2024 at 8:30 a.m. Staff M, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed during medication administration for Resident #37. Staff M did not perform hand hygiene before beginning the procedure. Staff M, RN prepared seven medications for the resident and administered them as ordered. An interview was conducted with Staff M and she stated she did not perform hand hygiene prior to her medication administration. Staff M stated she did not follow the hand hygiene policy. On 2/13/2024 at 8:50 a.m. Staff N, RN was observed during medication administration for Resident #358. Staff N, RN did not perform hand hygiene before beginning the procedure. Staff N, RN prepared twelve medications for the resident and administered them as ordered. An interview was conducted with Staff N and she stated she did not perform hand hygiene prior to her medication administration. Staff N stated she did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to store, distribute, and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety related to food stored underneath vents with an excessive amount of black build up in the mechanical room, a window blind with an excessive amount of dust and black build up directly behind food in the mechanical room, water stored on the floor in the mechanical room, a broken foot petal device on the trash can at the hand washing sink, inappropriate storage of utensils, and black buildup on the ice machine. Findings included: On 11/02/21 at 9:47 a.m., the Kitchen Manager reported that the hurricane supply was stored in the mechanical rooms, and he would have to get a key to open the door. At 9:49 a.m., the Kitchen Manager returned with the key and escorted the surveyor to the mechanical room next to the conference room near the 200 unit. The vent above cases of mashed potatoes, graham crackers, canned tuna, and juices was observed with an excessive amount of black build up. The window blind behind cans of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and honor resident rights for three (Residents #96, #106, and #20) of 15 sampled residents, related to ensuring that dignity was maintained related to urinary drainage bags. Findings included: 1) A review of Resident #96's admission record revealed that she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included severe sepsis with septic shock, urinary tract infection, and acute cystitis without hematuria. A review of Resident #96's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented in Section C (Cognitive Patterns) that Resident #96's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. Review of Section G (Functional Status) reflected that Resident #96 required physical assistance with toileting, bed mobility, and supervision with eating. Section H (Bladder and Bowel) indicated that she had an indwelling catheter. On 11/02/21 at 11:18 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were followed related to checking for incontinence and repositioning for one (Resident #89) of fifty one sampled residents. Findings included: On 11/4/2021 from 7:20 a.m. -10:22 a.m., Resident #89 was observed seated in a fully reclined [Brand name] chair, positioned in the [NAME] unit television/activity lounge, which was directly across from the nurses' station. Resident #89 was positioned in the lounge and in front of the television. She was observed lying in a manner where she could watch the television. She was observed in the same position and without staff checking on her or interacting with her from at least 7:20 a.m. through to 10:22 a.m., which was over three (3) hours. During this period, staff did not speak with her, offer her hydration, nor repositioned her. Resident #89 was noted as dressed for the day and had a blanket over most of her body up to her neckline. She was observed with padding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review the facility failed to honor the bathing preference of a shower for one resident (#75) of forty nine sampled residents. Findings included: On 2/17/2020 at 9:35 a.m. a family member was observed at the 100-unit nursing station asking the nurse, Is my father going to get his shower this morning. She then asked the nurse for towels as she was heard saying my father has food in his beard. At 10:37 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #75's daughter and she said that she had concerns with her father getting his weekly showers since he had been admitted . Resident #75's daughter stated, My father is supposed to get two showers a week and that has not been happening. The daughter was asked if she had told anyone about her concerns, she stated, I told his nurse today. I went to the desk this morning and had to ask for towels. My father had food in his beard this morning when I got here. I know he didn't get his shower this morning. Resident# 75's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to appropriately secure medications in two medication carts (#2 East Hall, #1 [NAME] Hall) of four medication carts sampled. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, Page 48, with a revision date of August 2014, reads under Procedures: A. The provider pharmacy dispenses medications in containers that meet regulatory requirements, including standards set forth by the United States (USP). Medications are kept in these containers. C. All Medications dispensed by the Pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy label. On 02/20/2020 at 11:25 a.m., an observation of the East Hall Medication Cart #2 was conducted. The second drawer from the top of the medication cart contained a one-half (½) loose orange tablet, and in the back of the drawer it was observed that one-half (½) of a pink tablet was also loose amongst the punch cards in the drawer. Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) confirmed the presence of the unsecured tablets. (Photographic Evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that direct caregivers (Staff G, Staff I and a Therapy Tech) followed standard infection control precautions related to artificial nails and nail length. Findings included: On 2/17/20 at 12:15 p.m. lunch trays were being distributed to residents in the 100-hallway. Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed delivering meal trays to multiple resident rooms. She was observed to have fingernails approximately one inch in length from the nail bed. She was observed to use a hand sanitizer as she rubbed the front and back of her hands with no care to the front or under sides of her fingernails. On 2/17/20 at 2:00 p.m. Staff G, CNA was observed leaving a resident room in the 100-hallway. She was carrying a clear colored plastic bag that contained an incontinent product. She went to the soiled utility room as she disposed of the bag. She was observed to have fingernails approximately one inch in length from the nail bed. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CLEAR CHOICE HEALTHCARE — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 4 of 53.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KENNEDY, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2003
PARTEE, LESLIEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2022
CLEAR CHOICE HEALTH CARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2007
EGNATZ, NICHOLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2025
MATHEW, DANIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/29/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 21%Other / private 22%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,920per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$368per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105697. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-02-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next