No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Athens Post Acute LLC

545 West Euclid Avenue, Deland, FL 32720 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (386) 734-9085 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (386) 734-9085 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)$49,394 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $49,394 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-22)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
340 S Woodland Blvd · (386) 202-4209 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Jack Lay0.6 mi
319 S Woodland Blvd · (386) 734-3383 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
221 S Woodland Blvd · (386) 734-5956 · Call to confirm hours
Park
520 S Clara Ave · (386) 740-6825 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
502 S Orange Ave · (386) 734-3364

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.8%8.7%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.7%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.7%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.0%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.1%9.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.7%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.2%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.7%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication11.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.6%94.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.0%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%9.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.872.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.271.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.0–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
58.5%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.482 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-20)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and facility job description review, it was determined that the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing (DON) on a full time basis. The findings include: On 11/29/23 at 2:20 pm, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing who was asked how long she has worked for the facility. She stated, I started Monday, November 27 of this week. When asked what her title is she stated, I'm Director of Nursing. She was asked how many hours she works as the Director of Nursing. She stated, I work at least 40 hours. I'm also Director of Nursing at our other facility, (facility named). She was asked if she divides her time between the two facilities. She stated, I'm expected to be at each facility each day, for whatever hours are needed. She was asked what her duties are as Director of Nursing. She stated, I oversee the nursing process. I report to the administrator. I ensure the nursing staff are following the policies and the CMS regulations. I provide staff training for on-boarding and ongoing in-services. I'm also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to properly store food with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility. Opened bundles of bread stored on the bread rack were not sealed and date marked. Food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 11/27/2023 at 10:05 a.m. During the tour, no date markings were observed on two open bundles of bread located on the bread rack in the dry storage room. Another observation was made on 11/28/2023 at 9:20 a.m. At that time, eight open bundles of bread were observed on the bread rack in the dry storage room with no date marking. (Photographic evidence obtained) A follow-up tour of the kitchen was conducted on 11/29/2023 at 10:35 a.m. Six open bundles of bread were observed on the bread rack in the dry storage room with no date marking.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident group with a private space for 8 out of 12 residents sampled. A resident group is defined as a group of residents that meets regularly to: Discuss and offer suggestions about facility policies and procedures affecting residents' care, treatment, and quality of life; Support each other; Plan resident and family activities; Participate in educational activities; or For any other purpose. The findings include: On 11/27/23 at 11:30 am, the Activity Director was asked when the next scheduled Resident Council Meeting would be held. She stated it was scheduled for that day at 2:00 pm. She was asked if she could confirm if Resident #13 was the Resident Council President. She stated yes. She stated Resident #8 was the [NAME] President, and had previously been the President. On 11/27/23 at 11:45 am, Resident #13 was asked if she was the Resident Council Present. She stated yes. She was asked how long she had been President. She stated she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, observations, review of the resident council minutes and the Resident Handbook, the facility failed to ensure packages and mail were unopened when received for 1 of 13 sampled residents (Resident #32). Residents have the right to receive mail and packages unopened. The privacy of the residents are affected. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #32 in his room on 11/28/23 at 10:45 a.m. He reported having concerns that his mail and packages are being brought to him opened at times. His packages have to be opened in front of staff, usually the activity director. The resident was alert and oriented, and spoke clearly. He reported discussing this in Resident Council meetings. A record review was conducted for Resident #32 which noted an admission date of 3/1/23 and re-entry date on 7/14/23. Diagnoses included non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and mood disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set on 9/4/23 noted resident has a BIMS of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #32 was observed receiving an Amazon package…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide activities of daily living services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene, specifically fingernail care, for one resident (Resident #23) out of 12 residents sampled. The findings include: On 11/27/23 at 12:15 pm, Resident #23 was observed in his room and had fingernails elongated on each finger. He was asked if he prefers his fingernails to be that long. He stated, NO! I don't. The interview was stopped at that time due to resident's display of anger. On 11/28/23 at 10:10 am, Resident #23 was observed up and dressed in day clothes in the milieu. His fingernails were observed to be elongated. He was asked if he prefers his fingernails to be that long. He stated, No, I gotta get these nails cut. The resident was asked if he would allow his fingernail lengths to be measured. He stated yes. The following measurements were taken from tip of finger to end of nail: Left hand thumb: 1 centimeter Left hand first finger: 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews, and a review of the facility's dialysis policy, the facility failed to ensure shared communication between the facility and the dialysis center for one of one resident receiving hemodialysis services, from a total of 12 residents in the sample. (Resident #29) The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #29 revealed no communication with the dialysis clinic he attended. A review of the resident's current physician's orders revealed an order for Dialysis Center Dialysis: M/W/F (Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays) at the named dialysis center, with a chair time of 11:40 AM. On 11/28/23 at 12:44 PM Resident #29 was observed in his room resting in bed and would only answer a few questions. He affirmed that the facility sends a bag meal/snack with him to dialysis. On 11/30/23 at 9:15 AM Employee C, Unit Manager, was interviewed. Employee C had been employed by the facility since 4/20/23. She was asked to explain the facility process for sending and receiving pertinent information about the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of medication administration, interviews with staff, and review of the Policies and Procedures for Infection Control/Medical Waste Handling, and Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident Care Items and Equipment, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% with two errors out of 33 opportunities. The medication error rate was 6.06% due to the nurse discarding a sharps needle in the room trash can and using durable medical equipment without cleaning afterwards. The findings include: On 11/28/23 at 10:33 a.m., Employee A, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed administering a blood glucose check in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The RN used a lancet to check the blood glucose, and after completion threw the lancet and test strip in the trash can at bedside. An interview was conducted with Employee A, on 11/28/23 at 10:40 a.m. He confirmed the lancet and test strip were thrown in the trash can and should have been disposed of in the sharps container. An observation was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-27 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the Director of Dining Services (DDS), who was not a qualified dietitian was not full-time at the facility and the facility's consultant dietitian state license was expired and national Dietetic Registration could not be verified. This has the potential to impact all facility residents. The findings include: On the first three days of the survey (01/24/22 through 01/26/22), the Director of Dining Services (DDS) was not present in the facility. On the first day of the survey on 01/24/22, there were two nursing staff observed during the initial kitchen tour at 10:37 AM who prepared breakfast. The staff indicated at that time that the DDS worked between 2 affiliated nursing homes. The DDS was a Certified Dietary Manager, and not a qualified dietitian. On 01/27/22 at 8:25 AM, during a follow up visit to the kitchen, the DDS was present. He said he comes to this facility twice a week on Tuesdays and Wednesday and then he changed the days he visited this facility several times. He was hired back in April 2021. He indicated he was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. The facility failed to do the following: Store single-service articles and food to protect contamination, properly reheat Time/Temperature for Control for Safety (TCS) Food Protect exposed food, clean equipment, clean utensils, clean linens, single-service and single-use items, and the kitchen area from contamination, maintain equipment and areas in a clean condition and in good repair, Date-mark refrigerated resident food and ensure it was not stored too long under refrigeration. Ensure that the Person in Charge (the Director of Dining Services (DDS) provided adequate oversight of Dining Service Staff so that they were knowledgeable of proper cooking of TCS Food through daily oversight of the employee's routine monitoring of cooking temperatures and knowledgeable of proper sanitization of cleaned multiuse equipment and utensils before they are reused, through routine monitoring of sanitizing solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that garbage and refuse was disposed of properly. The condition of the outside facility garbage dumpster, which was used for the entire facility, was such that that the surfaces were no longer smooth and durable; garbage and refuse was not contained and did not prevent rodent and pest attraction and harborage. Additionally, the Dining Services staff did not ensure garbage receptacles were covered in the kitchen. The findings include: At 01/25/22 at 3:48 PM, a staff person was observed through the facility activity/dining area window throwing out a white plastic bag into the facility garbage dumpster. The door to the side of the dumpster was open and there were no lids to the dumpster. During a follow up visit to the kitchen on 01/26/22 at 12:06 PM, the two garbage receptacles in the kitchen were not covered. At 12:13 PM, the facility garbage dumpster was observed up close. The dumpster did not have a lid and the side door was left open. The dumpster was extremely rusted to the extent that there was a hole in the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 6 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and document review, the facility failed to 1) ensure that it provided one (Resident #26) out of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, the use of a call bell adapted for a medical condition, and 2) Ensure that it made available call light devices for seven (Residents #17, #23, #6, #241, #291, #36 and #30) of 30 sampled residents from a total of 43 residents had access to their call lights at all times. The findings include: 1. During an observation of Resident #26's room on 1/24/2022 at 2:07 PM, the call light was observed wrapped around the bedrail. On 1/25/2022 at 3:28 PM, Resident #26 was observed in her bed. Her call light was wrapped around the bedrail within her reach. Resident #26 was requested to open and close her hands. She could only slightly wiggle her fingers and was unable to use the call bell provided. On 1/26/2022 at 11:39 AM, Resident #26 was observed sitting in a chair next to the bed. The call light remained wrapped around the handrail on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 out of 19 sampled resident rooms (rooms 112, 111, 207 and 106) with soiled privacy curtains, furnishings in disrepair, soiled floors, and soiled resident furnishings in these resident rooms. The findings include: On 1/24/22 at 1:05 PM, during an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], the cold water did not turn on at the bathroom faucet. Additionally, the bottom edge of the wood and Formica counter in the front of the resident sink (not in the bathroom) in room [ROOM NUMBER] was disintegrating. (Photographic evidence obtained) During an observation on 1/24/22 at 2:34 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], three drawers in one of the dressers were off the track and were slanted in the dresser. They were positioned in a manner so that the bottom 2 drawers could not be opened. The top drawer was missing. Additionally, the privacy curtain for 111 D had a large brown colored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #36) out of 30 sampled residents received the minimum scheduled showers to maintain good personal hygiene. The findings include: On 1/25/22 at 12:01 PM, Resident #36 stated he doesn't get showered twice a week. He said that his scheduled number of showers is twice a week and sometimes the staff don't get to him at the end of the shift. He gets showered only once a week and it has been happening often. Resident #36 appeared clean, and no odors were detected. Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of quadriplegia. According to Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/06/21, he was coded as having a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated he had no cognitive impairment, and he had no indicators of delirium. This assessment indicated that he required transfer with extensive assistance with 2 persons physical assist and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities for one (Resident #6) out of 30 sampled residents. The findings include: During an interview on 1/24/22 at 2:07 PM, Resident #6 said they don't have activities here. He would like some exercise, such as tossing the ball and dancing. He would like to go outside, but they don't let them go out. They are locked up. He has things that he's ordered online that he has to return. He was told it was up to the doctor to let him out. On 1/25/22 at 2:40 PM, Resident #6 said that he wants to go out to return several packages he ordered online, but he has been unable to. The deadline for return these packages will be coming to an end. He said that he has not been able to go out of the facility. He asked the administrator about this, and she told him he has to ask the doctor. His doctor hasn't given him approval. Resident #6 said that other residents can go out. Resident #6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure it provided an accurately documented Psychosocial Participation Record for two (Residents #23 and #26) of four residents reviewed for activities, out of 30 sampled residents. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Employee J, Activity Director on 01/27/2022 at 1:02 PM. The Activity Director was asked to provide activity assessment documentation for multiple residents that included Resident #23 and Resident #26. The Activity Director produced documents with the date 2012 at the interview for Residents #13, #17 and #23. She did not have a form for Resident #26 at that time. During the interview, the surveyor wrote the time 1:08 PM on a blank Psychosocial Participation Records on the bottom of the pages, located at the back of the pad that contained blank forms. The pad had 3-4 blank yellow blank pages; and several others had Resident names handwritten which were incomplete. The Activity Director was asked about the forms, she stated that she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow standard precautions to prevent the spread of infections by not providing proper hand hygiene during a dressing change after cleaning feces from peri area for one (Resident #19) of two residents reviewed with pressure ulcers, out of 30 sampled residents. The findings include: A medical record review was conducted for Resident #19, which revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and a re-entry date of 1/14/21. A review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 1/20/22, which read: sacrum, buttocks discoloration wound: Cleanse with normal saline (or soap and water, pat area dry, apply zinc oxide barrier cream (Boudreaux's butt paste) to wound bed and discoloration every shift as well as needed for soiling. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed an unhealed pressure ulcer, Stage II. An interview was conducted with the interim Director of Nurses (DON) on 1/25/22 at 11:08 a.m. She reported Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$49,394 in federal fines across 7 penalties.

  • $14,814 — penalty dated 2024-01-22
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $12,703 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELEVATION HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 51.6+2.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ATHENS POST ACUTE HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 09/22/2022
FUNK, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2022
FUNK, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2022
LINDSEY, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SMITH, STERLINGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2024
ELEVATION HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2022
BRUTEN, UVONDEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/14/2025
DANIELS, BRITTANIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
EASON, SHEREEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
EDDIN, HUSAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
HAYWARD, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2026
LIPKOWITZ, HOWARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
NEUBIA, JEREMIAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/12/2025
ROGERS, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2026
ROMERO, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
TIPTON, NICHOLASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$559K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 17%Other / private 8%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $559K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,168per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105261. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next