No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tower Road Post Acute, LLC

26 Tower Road, Marietta, GA 30060 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (770) 422-8913 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (770) 422-8913 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
699 Church St NE Ste 500 · (770) 424-7100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
790 Church St NE · (770) 424-3131 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
714 Allgood Rd NE · (678) 213-1599 · Call to confirm hours
Park
336 Camp St NW · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.5%15.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.9%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.9%11.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.7%15.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%20.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.8%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%5.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine61.9%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.6%25.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.0%11.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.602.151.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.201.901.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 457 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 176 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.2%CMS range 56.3–64.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 10.1–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 4.5–9.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.29
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
58.3%
Total nursing turnover
76.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 113.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods and Food Storage: Dry Goods, the facility failed to ensure opened food items in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area were labeled, dated, and discarded by expiration date. The deficient practice had the potential to affect residents who receive an oral diet from the kitchen.Findings include:Review of facility's policy titled, Food Storage: Cold Foods revised date February 2023 revealed in Procedures section, . 5. All food will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. Review of facility's policy titled, Food Storage: Dry Goods revised date February 2023, revealed in Procedures section, . 6. Storage areas will be neat, arranged for easy identification, and date marked as appropriate.During the initial brief tour on 1/6/2026 at 8:44 am, with District Manager (DM) revealed a tour and inspection of the food storage pantry was conducted, focusing on labels, dating, expiration, and the past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriations, the facility failed to protect residents by not reporting verbal abuse to the State Agency (SA) for one of 38 sampled residents (R) (R11). The deficient practice had the potential for other residents to experience verbal abuse.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriations, revised 1/1/2025, policy statement revealed: It is the organization's intention to prevent the occurrence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, injuries of unknown origin, and misappropriation of resident property, and to assure that all alleged violations of federal or State laws which involve abuse, neglect, exploitation, injuries of unknown origin and misappropriation of resident property are investigated, and reported immediately to the Facility Administrator, the State Survey Agency, and other appropriate State and local agencies in accordance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of 38 sampled residents (R) R19. Specifically, bilateral fall mats were not used in accordance with the care plan. This deficient had the potential to increase the risk of medical complications for R19Findings include:Review of the policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, Policy Statement revealed: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable, objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident R19 was admitted with pertinent diagnoses including but were not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, stage 3a, cognitive communication deficit, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care for one of 38 residents (R) (R125) related to bathing. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living revised April 2025, revealed under Policy Statement: . Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R125 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.A review of the (in progress) Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Five-Day assessment dated [DATE] documented R125 presented with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure that two of 29 residents (R) (R1 and R125) were administered oxygen therapy in accordance with the physician's ordersFindings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revised date October 2010, revealed in section Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration. A review of the clinical record for R1 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with (acute) exacerbation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, unspecified organism.The resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Policy, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed for two of three residents (R) (R35 and R38) observed during medication administration. Specifically, during medication observation the nurse was observed administering medications without using hand hygiene prior to or after administering medications, did not wash or sanitize her hands before or after entering an enhanced barrier precaution room and then went to another room and administered medications. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to the spread of infection and illness. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policy reviewed 2/1/2025 revealed under Policy Statement, The facility strives to prevent transmission of infections and communicable diseases, development of nosocomial infection, and effectively treat and manage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or responsible party (RP) was notified of a change in condition related to intravenous fluid and antibiotic use for one of nine sample residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for change in condition. This failure had the potential of R4 receiving treatments not aligned with the residents' or the responsible party's wishes for the residents' care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Clinical Change in Condition Management, dated 2/1/2024, revealed The Interdisciplinary team strives to identify and manage all residents that are experiencing a change in condition .Clinical care management includes routine assessment, evaluation, response to changes in clinical condition and communication with residents and/or families/responsible parties .7. Verify that family/responsible party has been notified. Review of R4's undated admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) as required for one of three residents (Resident (R) 8) reviewed for beneficiary notices of nine sample residents. This failure could result in the residents not being informed of the residents' responsibility related to facility costs. Findings include: Review of R8's undated admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to hypertension, dementia, and hyperlipidemia. Review of R8's unsigned Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), provided by facility, revealed R8's skilled nursing and therapy services would end 6/7/2025. Review of documentation provided by the facility, representing the SNF ABN, dated 6/5/2025 and signed by the Business Office Manager (BOM) revealed the following documentation Please sign below to indicate you received and understood this notice, or nursing home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of relevant facility documentation, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, homelike environment in resident rooms on three of three halls. Specifically, surveyor observations included peeling paint, missing air vent covers, holes in walls, bent/broken blinds, a broken light fixture pull cord, a loose electrical wall socket, and cracked floors. The sample size was 59 residents. Findings include: 1. Initial observation of the facility on 9/15/2024 beginning at 10:45 am revealed the following concerns: room [ROOM NUMBER]: paint peeling behind the wall of bed two and in the bathroom. room [ROOM NUMBER]: a towel was wrapped around the toilet piping. room [ROOM NUMBER]: missing air vent cover in the bathroom; chipped and missing paint on the wall of the bathroom. room [ROOM NUMBER]: the toilet was leaking on to the floor and there was a puddle of clear substance on the floor behind the toilet; the sink was very slow draining. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures below 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) in 17 of 22 bathrooms sampled for water temperatures on three of three halls. This failure had the potential to cause serious injury to affected residents. The facility census was 118 residents. Findings include: Initial observation of the facility on 9/16/2024 beginning at 12:15 pm revealed the water from the bathroom sinks was too hot to touch on three of three halls. Observation and interview with the Maintenance Director (MD) on 9/16/2024 beginning at 12:15 pm revealed the following: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]=110 degrees F 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]=111 degrees F 3. room [ROOM NUMBER]=120 degrees F 4. room [ROOM NUMBER]=120 degrees F 5. room [ROOM NUMBER]=120 degrees F 6. room [ROOM NUMBER]=120 degrees F 7. room [ROOM NUMBER]=118 degrees F 8. room [ROOM NUMBER]=109 degrees F 9. room [ROOM NUMBER]=122 degrees F 10. room [ROOM NUMBER]=123 degrees F 11. room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, the facility failed to maintain the dignity and privacy for one of five residents (R) (R50) with a Foley catheter. Specifically, the urinary catheter bag was left uncovered and visible while R50 was out in the hallway. Additionally, R50 was wearing a shirt on with her full name visible across her chest in thick black marker. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated 2/1/2024 revealed under Preparation in section 1. Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service training on resident rights, including . b. Resident dignity and respect. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R50 was admitted to the facility with pertinent diagnoses including but was not limited to dementia, depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of R50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to ensure one of 59 sampled residents (R) (R13) was assessed for self-administration of medication prior to leaving medications at the bedside. The deficient practice had the potential to allow unauthorized access to unsecured medications to residents and visitors at the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents revised on 2/1/2024 revealed under Policy Statement: Each resident who desires to self-administer medication is permitted to do so if the healthcare center's Licensed Nurse/Registered Nurse and physician have determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the healthcare center. Medication self-administration also applies to family members who wish to administer medication. Procedure: 1. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Residents Rights Accommodation of Needs and Preference and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one of 14 residents (R) (R112) reviewed for environmental concerns. Specifically, the facility did not ensure call light was within reach. This failure had the potential to prevent R112 from receiving care or service when needed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Residents Rights Accommodation of Needs and Preference and Homelike Environment effective date 2/1/2024 states under 1. The facility will assess and interview residents for the need to make reasonable accommodations. Call light in reach for room and bathroom and the correct type for resident use to meet the resident need. Review of R112's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, Visitation, the facility failed to have a system in place which allows visitors into the facility after hours. Findings include: The policy titled, Visitation revealed in the Policy Statement: The facility permits residents to receive visitors whom he or she designates, and the resident has the right to withdraw or deny such consent at any time. Under Guideline . 3. The facility will provide immediate access for residents receiving visits from the following: a. Any representative of CMS or State representatives such as Surveyors. g. The resident's legal representative, immediate family or relatives, and any other person visiting with the resident's consent, subject to limitations outlined in this policy. Observation on 9/18/2024 at 6:00 am from the outside of the front of the facility revealed a very dark entrance. Lights were all off with the exception of security lights in the front. There was a small posting on the front door which read, call 770 422 8913 for after hours. When the number was called, three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Review of the Beneficiary Notice, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) (Form CMS-10123) to two of two residents (R) (R29 and R36) who remained in the facility and were discharged from Medicare Part A services. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Review of the Beneficiary Notice revealed under Procedure, 3. If the resident is unable to sign, and the SNF (skilled nursing facility) is working with a legally authorized representative who is unable to be present at the facility that day, the SNF may issue the NOMNC by telephone. g. The facility must confirm the telephone contact by sending written notice to the authorized representative on the same day the call was made. 4. Copies of the completed NOMNC are: a. Given to the resident or the authorized representative who signed the NOMNC. Review of the Beneficiary Notice for R21 revealed no evidence that a NOMNC form was provided.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the dental status in the annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 59 sampled residents (R) (R72). This failure had the potential to prevent R72 from receiving necessary dental care. Findings include: Review of the clinical record for R72 revealed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include but not limited to cognitive communication deficit, unspecified dementia, unspecified neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, depression, and Parkinson's disease. Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section L (Oral and Dental Status Issues) 0200 listed options for the dental assessment to include no natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous), obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth, and none of the above were present. The assessment documented none of the above indicating no dental concerns. Observation on 9/16/2024 at 2:58 pm of R72 revealed she was missing all but one of her upper teeth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, PASRR, the facility failed to ensure that the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II was completed for one of 59 sampled residents (R) (R92). The deficient practice had the potential for R92 to not receive specialized care to treat mental illness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled PASRR with an effective date of 2/1/2024, revealed that it is the policy of the facility to screen all potential admissions on an individualized basis. As a part of the preadmission process, the facility participates in the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screening process (Level 1) for all new and readmissions to determine if the individual meets the criterion for mental disorder, intellectual disability or related condition. Based on the Level 1 screen, the facility will not admit an individual with a mental disorder or intellectual disability until the Level II screening process has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident, resident family, and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) / Care Plans, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for five of 59 sampled residents (R) (R49, R22, R113, R15 and R70). The deficient practice had the potential to affect the appropriate level of care and services provided for R49, R22, R113, R15 and R70. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) / Care Plans revised 2/1/2024 revealed in the Policy Statement: Each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place. The baseline care plan will be completed within 48 hours of admission. The Interdisciplinary Team will continue to develop the care plan in conjunction with the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), Minimum Data Set (MDS 3.0), and Care Area Assessment (CAAS), completing and conducting Certified Compliance Professional (CCP) meeting by Day 21 post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS) / Care Plans, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for three of 59 sampled residents (R) (R49, R111 and R92). The deficient practice had the potential to affect the care and services provided to R49, R111, and R92. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) / Care Plans revised 2/1/2024 revealed in the Policy Statement: Each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place. The baseline care plan will be completed within 48 hours of admission. The Interdisciplinary Team will continue to develop the care plan in conjunction with the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), Minimum Data Set (MDS 3.0), and Care Area Assessment (CAAS), completing and conducting Certified Compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS/Care Plans, the facility failed to include the resident (R), family, or family representative attended baseline care plan meetings and care plan meetings for one of 59 sampled residents (R) (R15). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plans revealed under Policy Statement: The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will continue to develop the care plan in conjunction with the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) (MDS 3.0) and CAAS (care area assessments) completing and conducting CCP (Comprehensive Care Plan) meeting by Day 21 post admission.The Comprehensive Care Plan will be ongoing, focusing on each individual resident as a unitary being. Resident and their representatives will play an active role in the development of goals and implementation of the residents' Comprehensive Car Plan. Under procedure number 5. The resident and/or representative will be offered a Care Plan Summary during the Admission, Annual, and/or Significant Change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on responsible party and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Discharge Planning, the facility failed to provide discharge instructions to the responsible party (RP) of one of 59 sampled residents (R) (R366) at discharge. The deficient practice had the potential for the RP of the discharging resident to not have the knowledge of the medications and therapy needs to properly care for the resident at home. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Discharge Planning with a revision date of 7/19/2024 revealed that guideline 5 states: The discharge plan will include at least the following: location resident plans to discharge, anticipated referrals, and anticipated durable medical equipment (DME). Guideline 7 states: The stakeholder will give a copy of the discharge plan to the resident and/or representative. A copy will be retained in the resident medical record. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R366 revealed that she was admitted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, AM Care, the facility failed to provide fingernail care for one dependent Resident (R) (R80). The sample size was 59. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, AM Care, dated 2/1/2024, states under the section titled Policy, Morning Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care will be provided to all residents. In subsection titled Procedure, number 12 states to Provide nail care. R80 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to type 2 diabetes, cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R80 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating R80 had severely impaired cognition. Section GG (Functional Status) documented that R80 is dependent on a helper for personal hygiene. Review of R80's care plan dated 4/18/2024 documented focus related to ADLs requiring full staff assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on responsible party (RP) and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to make follow up appointments with physicians and transportation to physicians' appointments after discharge from the hospital for one of 59 sampled residents (R) (R366). The deficient practice had the potential to cause the resident to become unstable and possibly have to return to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R366 revealed that she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction, atrial fibrillation, cognitive communication deficit, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R366 from 5/1/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R366 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the discharge instructions from the hospital dated 12/15/2023 from the resident's admission on to the facility revealed that the resident was to follow up with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy for one of 15 residents (R) (R111) on oxygen therapy. The deficient practice posed significant risks, including potential medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen (O2) Administration with an effective date of 2/1/2024 revealed under section titled Policy Statement, the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under section titled Preparation, the facility stated to verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Furthermore, the Policy stated: adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were discarded on or after the expiration date in two of three medication rooms. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving medications or biologicals with altered effectiveness. The facility census was 118 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, dated 1/2023, revealed the Policy included Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturers or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration . The Procedures section included . 14. Outdated, contaminated, discontinued or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. Observation on [DATE] at 3:34 pm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and policy titled Hospice Program, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (R) (R45) reviewed for hospice had a physician's order for hospice services. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Hospice Program, last reviewed 9/15/2023, revealed the Policy Statement of Facility contracts for hospice services for residents who wish to participate in such programs. The Guidelines section included . 4. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will coordinate care by the facility staff and the hospice staff. The IDT will be responsible for the following: d.Hospice physician and applicable attending physician orders for the resident. A review of R45's clinical record revealed diagnoses included but was not limited to peripheral vascular disease and Alzheimer's disease with late onset. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section O (Special Treatments and Programs) documented that R45 received hospice care. A review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed during medication administration via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) for one of one resident (R) (R39) reviewed with a G-tube, during perineal care for one of 59 sampled R (R50), and during tracheostomy care for one of one R (R39) reviewed with a tracheostomy. In addition, the facility failed to properly clean or disinfect shared medical equipment between residents and failed to ensure hand sanitizer dispensers were filled for staff use. These failures had the potential of exposing residents to infections due to cross-contamination. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement included The facility strives to prevent transmission of infections and communicable diseases, development of nosocomial infections, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was maintained in working order for one of two hallways (West Hall). This deficient practice had the potential to cause delays in response to resident needs. Findings include: 1. Observation on 9/17/2024 at 1:16 pm revealed four call lights on the [NAME] Hall nursing unit call light board were flashing and there was no sound from the system. In an interview on 9/17/2024 at 1:27 pm, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) KK stated she was unsure which rooms the activated call lights were for and notified the Maintenance Director. She stated when a call light was activated, it should make a sound and light up. She further stated if the call light was flashing, it indicated a high alert. In an interview on 9/17/2024 at 1:32 pm, the Maintenance Director stated the call lights had been repaired. 2. Observation on 9/16/2024 at 11:34 am revealed the call device in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]A failed to activate the light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer for one of two residents (R) (R#20) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 31 residents. The failure to provide a written notice of transfer increased the risk that the residents and/or representatives would not know the specifics of the transfer or the right to appeal. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet, revealed R#20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with congestive heart failure (CHF-the weakened muscles of the heart leading to the inability to properly circulate blood) and Atrial fibrillation (A. fib-irregular heartbeat). Review of the EMR Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) tab revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/22 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one out of 15 indicating R#20 was severely impaired cognitively. Review of the EMR Progress Notes revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice for one of two residents (R) (R#20) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 31 residents. The failure to provide a written bed hold notice increased the risk that the residents and/or representatives would not know to request a bed hold and/or the cost of the bed hold. Findings include: A policy for bed hold notices was requested. The Business Office Manager (BOM) provided a copy of the admission packet, revised 8/1/21, that included the following concerning bed holds: If you go to the hospital or out for an overnight leave you must tell ask [sic] Facility in writing to hold or not assign your bed to another resident. When you are ready to leave, we will give you a copy of our policy with instructions and the bed hold election form for you to complete. Note! There is a fee to hold your bed, and your insurance may or may not cover it: Private Pay . you will be charged and must pay the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations for a written rationale for continuing a PRN (as needed) order for Ativan (antianxiety medication) beyond 14 days and to include a duration date in one of four residents (R) (R#88) reviewed for psychotropic medications in a total sample of 31 residents. This failure increased the risk of R#88 receiving an excessive amount of antianxiety medication. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Psychotropic Medications Policy, revised 6/22/22, revealed Psychotropic medications will be used appropriately for residents with mental illness and/or related disorders . These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and hypnotic . PRN orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days. With the exception of, the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to: 1. Identify and implement resident specific nonpharmacological interventions for yelling out prior to prescribing Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) and administered Seroquel without documented behaviors for one resident (R) (R#99); and 2. Prescribe PRN (as needed) Ativan (an antianxiety medication) for a limited time of 14 days and failed to provide a written rationale for extending the medication beyond 14 days for one of four residents (R#88) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications out of a total sample of 31 residents. This failure increased the risk of adverse side effects from the use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Psychotropic Medications Policy, revised 6/22/22, revealed Psychotropic medications will be used appropriately for residents with mental illness and/or related disorders . These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELEVATION HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ELEVATION HOLDINGS GEORGIA LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2024
ELEVATION HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
KMOM LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2024
BARRETT, OMARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2024
DESORMEAUX, ALLISONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
EASON, SHEREEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
FUNK, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
FUNK, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
FUNK, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
KELLEY, JUSTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2023
LINDSEY, JACOBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
MACK, JASMAINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
MINCEY, CAROLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/2025
MOHAN, AMARIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
NEELY, KAITLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2024
PATTON, HERBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
ROMERO, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
SCOTT, JOYCELYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2024
SHOTWELL, TYKEVIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
SMITH, STERLINGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2024
TAYLOR, TROYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 52%Medicare 17%Other / private 31%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$436per resident / day
operating cost
$13,246per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$359per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next