No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Savannah Post Acute LLC

815 East 63 Street, Savannah, GA 31405 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (912) 352-8615 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (912) 352-8615 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)$5,446 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $5,446 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-12)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
230 Duncan Dr Bldg 1440 · (912) 352-6193 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Lincare1.4 mi
101 N Gamble Rd · (912) 644-4577 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3310 Ogeechee Rd · (912) 358-0511 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5102 Acl Blvd · (912) 351-3841 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms56.6%11.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.2%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.4%20.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers11.3%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.9%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.0%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%2.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine52.6%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%25.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.8%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.712.151.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.871.901.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
35.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 35.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.7%CMS range 39.0–57.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.3–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge35.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge72.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 4.7–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
57.6%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plans, the facility failed to implement a care plan to monitor for adverse effects from anticoagulant medication for one of three sampled residents (R) (R8). This deficient practice had the potential to place R8 at increased risk of medical complications. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plans, dated 2/1/2024, revealed that the Procedure section included 3. Each discipline will be responsible for the initiation and ongoing follow-up for care plans as related to their area of expertise.Review of the Quarterly MDS for R8, dated 9/28/2025, revealed Section I (Active Diagnoses) documented diagnoses including but not limited to, bilateral pulmonary embolism (a blood clot in the lung), deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot in the leg), stroke, and hypertension. Review of the care plan for R8 revealed a Focus area, initiated 9/23/2025, of diagnoses of bilateral pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure that phenytoin (a medication used to prevent and control seizures) was not administered at the same time as a high-protein supplement for one of five residents (R) (R9) observed during medication pass observation. This deficient practice had the potential to place R9 at risk of medical complications related to potential reduced medication absorption. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration revealed that medications are administered as prescribed by the provider. Under procedures, medications are reviewed for any special precautions, and the needed evaluations are performed prior to administering medication to the resident. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R9, dated 9/13/2025, revealed that Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) revealed that R9 required substantial assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the care plan for R9, dated 8/20/2025, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's document titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes Algorithm, the facility failed to ensure respiratory staff followed infection control practices during tracheostomy care for one of two residents (R) (R13) with a tracheostomy. The deficient practice had the potential to place R13 at risk of respiratory illness and infection due to cross-contamination. Findings included: Review of the facility's document titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes Algorithm, dated 2022, revealed, The purpose of this algorithm is to outline when to use and how to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). 1. EBP are indicated for the following residents who are: At increased risk of MDRO (multidrug-resistant organism) acquisition (e.g., resident has a wound or indwelling medical device) .In addition to following Standard Precautions, gowns and gloves should be worn during the following high-contact resident care activities: Device care or use. With implementation, it is critical to ensure that staff have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to promote care in a manner that maintained or enhanced dignity and respect for one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R72). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the correct size brief was available to prevent incontinence leakage. This deficient practice had the potential to place R72 at risk of a diminished quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Findings include: Review of R72's clinical record revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, morbid obesity due to excess calories, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of R72's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/7/2025, revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment). Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documented R72 required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene. Section H (Bladder and Bowel) documented that R72 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriations, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for one of seven residents (R) (R20) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriations, reviewed 1/1/2025, revealed the Policy Components section included, . G. Reporting/Response 1 . Reporting Guidelines: . Any allegation of neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property must be reported to the State Regulatory Agency within 24 hours. Review of R20's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 (indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview). Review of R20 diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and muscle weakness.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold and Returns Policy, the facility failed to ensure one of 49 residents (R) (R72) was provided with a written bed hold notice. This failure had the potential to place the resident or resident representative at risk of being uninformed about their rights related to their return to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Hold and Returns Policy, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Procedure section included, . 3. Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the residents' representatives that explains in detail: a. The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed holds. b. the reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan c. the facility per diem rate required to hold a bed or to hold a bed beyond the stated bed hold period. Review of R72's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for one of five sampled residents (R) (R24) with a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II. Findings include: Review of R24's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section A (Identification Information) documented the resident had not been evaluated by Level II PASRR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition. Section I (Active Diagnoses) documented diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, and manic depression (bipolar). Review of R24 's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 3/18/2022. Review of R24's PASRR Level II revealed an approval date of 3/7/2022. During an interview on 5/15/2025 at 12:08 pm, the MDS Coordinator stated she was unaware that R24 had received approval for a PASRR Level II. She stated she planned to submit a modification of R24's MDS to accurately code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R) (R10) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II assessment was referred to the appropriate state-designated authority for review. This deficient practice had the potential to place R10 at risk of not receiving services or care according to their needs. Findings include: Review of R10's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/2024, revealed Section A (Identification Information) documented R10 had not been evaluated by Level II PASRR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition. Section I (Active Diagnoses) documented diagnoses including anxiety disorder and manic depression (bipolar disease). Review of R10 's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 2/15/2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, bipolar disorder mixed severe with psychotic features, dated 11/23/2022 and created 3/8/2024. Review of R10's EMR revealed no PASRR Level II. Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Person Centered Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one of 11 residents (R) (R24) who received oxygen (O2). In addition, the facility failed to implement the care plan for two of 11 R (R45 and R49) who received O2. These deficient practices had the potential to place R24, R45, and R49 at risk of respiratory complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Person Centered Care Plans, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement section included, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Procedure section included, . 8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: . b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R12) received services to maintain or improve their functional abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a supportive footrest/leg rest was secured to R12's wheelchair. This deficient practice had the potential to place R12 at risk of unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of R12's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/2/2025, revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 14 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment). Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documented that the resident had lower extremity impairment on both sides, required maximal assistance for lower body dressing, and was dependent for putting on and taking off footwear. Section M (Skin Conditions) documented that the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and had one stage four pressure ulcer. Review of R12's Care Plan Report revealed a Focus area,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure that three of 11 sampled residents (R) (R24, R45, and R49) were administered oxygen (O2) therapy in accordance with the physician's orders. This failure had the potential to place R24, R45, and R49 at risk of respiratory complications and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Preparation section included, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Review of R24's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/17/2025, revealed Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) documented that R24 received O2. Review of R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of R24 's Clinical Physician Orders revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Menus, the facility failed to ensure four of 49 sampled residents (R) (R90, R106, R103, and R72) were offered meal choices. In addition, the facility failed to ensure meal menus were followed for one of 49 sampled R (R72). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Menus, revised 10/2022, revealed the Procedures section included, . 6. Menus will be served as written, unless a substitution is provided in response to preference, unavailability of an item, or a special meal. 8. Menus will be posted in the Dining Services department, dining rooms, and resident/patient care areas. 1. Review of R90's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/18/2025, revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment). In an interview on 5/13/2025 at 12:25 pm, R90 stated he was not given a choice of meals, and the only alternative food offered was a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. He…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Person Centered Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of four sampled residents (R) (R1) with a history of wandering and exit-seeking behaviors. This failure increased the potential for R1 to not receive treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Person Centered Care Plans, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement was A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Procedure section included . 8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: . b. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. g. Incorporate identified problem areas. H. Incorporate risk factors associated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Elopement Risk and Prevention Program, the facility failed to provide protective oversight and supervision to prevent elopement when one of four sampled residents (R) (R1) exited the facility and was unaccounted for by staff for over one hour. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Elopement Risk and Prevention Program, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement of To identify those residents that have the potential to wander or are at risk for elopement. The Procedure section included 1. An elopement risk assessment will be completed by the admitting nurse/designee upon admission and readmission to the facility. The Elopement Prevention Program section included A. Residents identified at risk of elopement will have interventions placed. A review of R1's clinical record revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, depression, lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, a review of the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, and a review of the facility document titled Facility Assessment Tool 2024, the facility failed to ensure adequate nursing staff for the first quarter of 2024. The deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the care and services provided to the residents residing in the facility. The census was 109 residents. Findings include: A review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report Quarter 1 2024 (October 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023) revealed that based on the data submitted, the facility triggered for a One-Star Staffing Rating (Failure to submit PBJ data by the deadline, more than 4 days in the quarter without Registered Nurse (RN) Staffing hours, failure to respond to, submit documentation for, or failure to pass a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) audit designed to discover discrepancies in PBJ data). A review of The Facility Assessment Tool 2024 revealed the average daily census in the facility was 106 to 109 residents. Further review revealed the facility personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and a review of the facility document titled Certified Medication Aide Bi-Annual Checklist, the facility failed to ensure that services provided by Certified Medication Aides (CMA) met professional standards of quality. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that three of four CMAs completed a Medication Administration Competency Skills Checklist for CMAs before being allowed to administer medications to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in adverse outcomes for residents related to medication administration. The census was 109 residents. Findings: A review of the facility's document titled Certified Medication Aide Bi-Annual Checklist, dated 2/1/2024, documented that RN (Registered Nurse)/Pharmacist will conduct an Annual Competency for Medication Administration for a Certified Medication Aide in the state of Georgia. The CMA must either conduct the medication administration skill with proficiency or verbalize how to complete the medication administration based on various routes. The checklist will remain in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Equipment and Environment, the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen walls, floors, and equipment were clean and free of rust, debris, and grease buildup and failed to use un-expired quaternary test strips in the three-compartment sink. The deficient practices had the potential to place all residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. The census was 109 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Equipment, revised 9/2017, revealed the Policy Statementof All foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. The Procedures section stated: 1. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's directions and training materials. 4. All non-food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use. 5. The Dining Services Director will submit requests for maintenance or repair to the Administrator and/or Maintenance Director as needed. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policies titled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse and Environment, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor garbage and refuse area was free of litter and maintained in a sanitary manner for two of two dumpsters. The deficient practice had the potential to promote the harboring of pests, insects, and other organisms and create the potential for disease transmission by pests and rodents. The census was 109 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse, dated 8/2017, revealed the Policy Statement of All garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe and effective manner. The Procedures section stated: 1. The Dining Services Director coordinates with the Director of Maintenance to ensure that the area surrounding the exterior dumpster area is maintained in a manner free of rubbish or other debris. A review of the facility's policy titled Environment, dated 9/2017, revealed the Procedures section stated: 7. All trash will be properly disposed of in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Infection Control and Prevention Policy and COVID-19 Employee and Resident Prevention and Control Practices, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed to prevent transmission and spread of COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff changed their masks when entering and exiting COVID-19 Transmission-Based Precaution (TBP) rooms and failed to ensure staff closed the doors of two COVID-19 TBP rooms during care. The facility was in an outbreak, with 31 residents and 11 staff tested positive for COVID-19. This deficient practice had the potential to spread COVID-19 to other residents, staff, and visitors. The census was 109 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Policy, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement included: The facility strives to prevent transmission of infections and communicable diseases, development of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, the facility failed to provide evidence of a process for periodic review of antibiotic prescribing practices and failed to document follow-up measures in response to the data for 12 of 12 months of infection control data reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect any resident who was prescribed an antibiotic. The facility census was 109 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, dated 2/1/2024, revealed a Policy Statement of Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. The Procedure section stated, 1. The purpose of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics to the residents. A review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Log revealed no documentation in the log book for July 2023 and January 2024 through March 2024. Further review revealed only a facility map labeled with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility document titled Healthcare Center Infection Preventionist, the facility failed to designate a qualified staff member to the role of Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) for two of the last 12 months and failed to ensure staff assigned to the role of ICP had enough time to perform the ICP responsibilities for six of the last 12 months. These deficient practices had the potential to create an ineffective Infection Prevention program that may contribute to the spread of infectious diseases among all residents in the facility. The census was 109 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility document titled Healthcare Center Infection Preventionist, with an effective date of 2/1/2024, revealed the Job Purpose of: The Healthcare Center Infection Preventionist is responsible for the development, direction, implementation, management and operation of the infection prevention in the healthcare center. The Key Responsibilities section and the subtitle Infection Prevention documented: j. Develops, implements and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, the facility failed to thoroughly complete resident grievance forms to provide evidence that resident grievances were resolved in a timely manner and to ensure that residents were satisfied with the final resolutions for 42 of 101 resident grievance forms reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to have an adverse effect on any resident who filed a grievance. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy, revised 2/1/2024, documented the Policy Statement of It is the policy for healthcare centers to have and follow an established process whereby residents and/or other customers may have their grievances and complaints resolved in a prompt, reasonable and consistent manner. The Procedure section stated: 2. The Social Services or Administrator will be responsible for tracking all grievances: * The Social Services Director/Administrator will track the grievance on the Grievance Log Form. This will provide a central place for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to ensure three of 54 sampled residents (R) (R30, R32, and R71) did not have unsecured and unauthorized medication or medicated treatment products at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to cause adverse effects for R30, R32, and R71 and allow unauthorized medication access to other residents and visitors. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, effective date of 2/1/2024, documented the Policy Statement of Each resident who desires to self-administer medication is permitted to do so if the healthcare center's Licensed Nurse/Registered Nurse and physician have determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the healthcare center. Medication self-administer also applies to family members who wish to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0574 — isolated
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to post a complete listing of how to report abuse and the types of abuse, including a mailing address, email address, and information on how to report to the State Agency in a manner accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 109 residents. Findings include: During the initial tour on 4/8/2024 at 10:15 am and during daily walks throughout the building during the survey week of 4/8/2024 through 4/12/2024, observations revealed a posted white paper, measuring 8 x 10 inches, with bold black print stating Georgia Department of Community Services [PHONE NUMBER]. During the Resident Council Meeting held on 4/9/2024 at 1:45 pm, residents were educated on Resident Rights and Abuse. Eight of the 11 residents in attendance did not know what information to report to the State Agency or how to report it. None of the 11 residents could identify the location of the posting of the Georgia Department of Community Services telephone number. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act. Specifically, the facility failed to report the misappropriation of property to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for two of four residents (R) (R41 and R45) who were investigated for abuse. This failure had the potential to have a negative impact on the quality of life for R65 and R41. The sample size was 54 residents. A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation of Property, revised 9/15/2023, revealed the Policy Statement stated: It is the organization's intention to prevent the occurrence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, injuries of unknown origin, and misappropriation of resident property, and to assure that all alleged violations of federal {sic}or State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of R41's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment documented that R41 had not exhibited behaviors. A review of a Grievance/Concern Form documented that R41 filed a grievance on 3/22/2024 stating that he was missing six hundred dollars. This grievance was documented by the Social Service Assistant (SSA). Findings from the grievance investigation indicated that the facility's safe was checked, and the money or wallet was not found. Further review of the grievance form revealed that the SSA and resident signed the form on 3/22/2024. The form was not signed or dated by the Administrator. In an interview on 4/11/2024 at 10:07 am, R41 revealed that he had recently reported that 600 dollars had been taken from him. R41 further stated that a report was taken and that he had filed a grievance in the past related to the issue, but no one had followed up with him about his money. A further interview revealed he signed the form but was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plan, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for three of 54 sampled residents (R) (R11, R60, and R49). Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan for contracture management for R11, implement a care plan for oxygen therapy for R11, dialysis care and treatment for R60, and oxygen therapy for R49. The deficient practice had the potential to place R49, R11, and R60 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plan, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement of Each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place. The Comprehensive Care Plan will be resident-centered, having the individual resident as the focus of control. The Procedure section stated: 2. The Interdisciplinary Team will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Bathing-Shower, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), specifically baths or showers, for one resident (R) (R5) of 54 sampled residents. This failure placed R5 at risk for unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Bathing-Shower, effective 2/1/2024, revealed the Purpose section stated: To clean the skin and shampoo hair (as needed). To increase circulation. To exercise body parts. To reduce tension. To promote comfort while maintaining safety and dignity. The Procedure section stated: 29. Provide the resident with the opportunity to bathe according to preference and facility procedure. 31. Review and revise resident/patient bathing plan, as indicated. A review of the clinical record revealed R5 had diagnoses including, but not limited to, muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus with moderate nonproliferative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to transcribe an antibiotic medication order and administer it as ordered by the physician, resulting in a delay in treatment for one resident (R) (R49) of seven residents receiving antibiotics. This failure had the potential for R49 to not receive medical treatment according to their needs and placed R49 at risk for adverse consequences. Findings Include: A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet revealed that R49 was re-admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 4/5/2024. A review of the facility-provided document titled Internal Medicine Discharge Summary, dated 4/6/2024, revealed that R49 had a current diagnosis of multifocal pneumonia. The discharge medication list included, but was not limited to, Levaquin (a medication used to treat bacterial infections) 750 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for five days, starting 4/5/2024. R49 was discharged back to the facility on 4/5/2024. A review of theProgress Notes revealed an entry dated 4/7/2024 of Resident returned to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled Contracture Management, the facility failed to ensure one of 54 sampled residents (R) (R11) reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM) received passive range of motion (PROM) exercises and splint application as needed to address limited ROM in her right upper extremity. This failure created a potential for worsening contracture (fixed resistance to passive stretch), pain, or skin breakdown for R11. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Contracture Management, dated 02/01/2024, revealed the Policy Statement of Assisting a resident to attain and/or maintain joint mobility promotes independence, prevents, or reduces contractures, preserves range of motion for use of prothesis, stimulates circulation and enhances muscle strengthening. A resident requiring passive range of motion, active range of motion and/or splint/brace application and removal are considered for the restorative program. Restorative programs including range of motion and splint/brace…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Oxygen Administration and Tracheostomy Care-Adults, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for four of seven residents (R) (R11, R39, R22, and R49) receiving respiratory services. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there was a current physician's order for oxygen therapy and oxygen saturation checks before administering oxygen, to ensure the oxygen concentrator and concentrator filters were clean, and to provide humidification for oxygen therapy for R11. In addition, the facility failed to document daily tracheostomy inner cannula change for R39. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrator filter was clean and to clarify a physician's order for oxygen for R22, failed to follow the physician's orders for oxygen, to ensure the oxygen concentrator had a filter, and to label and store respiratory equipment in a sanitary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Care, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center for one of one resident (R) (R60) reviewed for dialysis services. This deficient practice had the potential to place R60 at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis Care, effective 2/1/2024, documented the Policy Statement of Pre and Post care will be provided for dialysis residents. Communication to the dialysis will be completed and return documentation from the dialysis center will ensure the dialysis resident receives necessary interventions and shunt /end-stage renal disease (ESRD) management holistically. The Documentation section stated: 3. Complete the Pre and Post Dialysis assessment and send with the resident to dialysis. When a resident returns, upload document into the electronic health record and note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a pneumococcal vaccine policy and procedure for the residents; and failed to provide documentation that three of five sampled residents (R) (#77, #24, and # 79) were offered and/or received the pneumococcal vaccine. Findings include: Review of the medical records revealed the following: R#77 had no documentation in his medical record and no documentation could be provided indicating that he was offered the education and had the opportunity to consent or refuse the pneumococcal vaccine. R#24 had no documentation in her medical record and no documentation could be provided indicating that she was offered the education and had the opportunity to consent or refuse the pneumococcal vaccine. R#79 had no documentation in his medical record and no documentation could be provided indicating that he was offered the education and had the opportunity to consent or refuse the pneumococcal vaccine. The facility provided no evidence of pneumococcal vaccine policies. During an interview with the Infection Control Prevention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain a concurring Physician's signature for a Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) consents for one residents (R) (#111). The sample size was 34 residents. Findings include: Review of medical record for R#111 revealed a POLST with a choice to Allow Natural Death/DNR that was signed by one Physician on 4/12/22 and resident's daughter, that was not the residents Power of Attorney, on 4/6/22 there was no concurring Physician's signature. Further review of the Medical Record for R#111 also revealed that there was not a Health Care Agent for R#111 on file at facility. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/19/22 at 7:58 a.m. revealed DON stated per the facility's policy you do not need two physician's signatures on the POLST form. Interview with the Administrator on 5/19/22 at 8:45 a.m. revealed he did not have an answer as to why there was not a concurring physician's signature on the POLST form. Interview with Social Services Director (SSD) BB on 5/19/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that it was maintained in a safe clean and comfortable environment. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain clean privacy curtains in three rooms (102, 107, and 111), and failed to ensure that bathroom walls were in good repair in three resident rooms (106, 107, and 110). The facility census was 109. Findings Include: Initial facility tour conducted on 5/17/22 at 9:00 a.m. revealed observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] privacy curtain by the window of bed B had dark brown stain by the hem of the curtain. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed bathroom wall has chipped paint under towel rack with sheet rock cracked and exposed and also black markings. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] privacy curtain between bed B and C had brown debris noted on the curtain. There was scuff markings on the bathroom wall with sheet rock exposed surrounded by black markings on the wall. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed an unlabeled urinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that treatment orders for one resident (R) (#71) were transcribed and implemented as ordered by the physician, of 10 residents with pressure ulcers. Findings include: Wound care observation on 5/19/22 at 9:15 a.m. for R#71 revealed Treatment Nurse gathered supplies from treatment cart which included dry gauze, Mesalt dressing, wound cleanser, gloves, and hand sanitizer. After nurse gathered supplies, nurse entered the residents' room and asked permission to complete dressing change. Resident was repositioned to her right side. An undated dressing was removed and placed on residents' bed on blue chuck that was resting underneath resident. Observation of R#71 wound revealed area to the top right of sacrum wound bed was beefy red with small amount of bloody drainage noted, wound edges where flat, no maceration was noted. Area was measured by wound doctor which included the following, wound was classified as a cluster wound with a surface area that measured 5.3 centimeters (cm) X 7.1cm X 1.2 cm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow Physician's Order for one resident (R) (R#68) of five residents who received nutrition via gastric feeding tube. Findings include: Observation on 5/18/22 at 2:20 p.m. revealed R#68 out of bed sitting in Geri-chair in day area on unit. Feeding pump was connected to G-tube, and tube feeding formula Jevity 1.2 Cal was infusing at 40 milliliters (ml)/ hour (hr). Review of the Physician's Order revealed to turn Jevity 1.2 Cal off at 6:00 a.m., and turn feeding tube Jevity 1.2 Cal on at 6:00 p.m. Interview with Unit Manager (UM) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) CC on 5/18/22 at 2:50 p.m. revealed R#68 tube feeding order is that her tube feeding is turned off at 6 a.m. and it is turned back on at 6 p.m. LPN CC stated the nurse put it on too early. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) II on 5/18/22 at 3:15 p.m. revealed she misread the order. She stated she is not a new nurse or new to the facility. RN II stated she was called into work today because of a nurse calling out. She stated most of the tube feedings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$5,446 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $5,446 — penalty dated 2024-04-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ELEVATION HEALTHCARE — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 4 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ELEVATION HOLDINGS GEORGIA LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2024
ELEVATION HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
KMOM LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2024
FUNK, KENNETHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
FUNK, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
LINDSEY, JACOBIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
SMITH, STERLINGIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
BRANTLEY, KE'VINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
BRIGGS, DEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2025
BROWNLEE, KARENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
EASON, SHEREEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
FREDERICKSON, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
GIGNAC, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/16/2025
HAYWARD, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2026
JONES, TIFFANYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2024
MARCUS, THEODOREIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2026
PATEL, NANDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2026
POE-JONES, EDDIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2026
RICE, GLORIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
ROMERO, PATRICIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2025
WRIGHT, SHAKEIRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 6%Other / private 15%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,159per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$262per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115120. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next