Parklands Care Center And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 88.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.9 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from the use of a physical restraints for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #28, reviewed for resident rights.Findings include:During an observation on 04/27/2026 at 10:17 AM, Resident #28 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with a seatbelt buckled; the resident is noted to have bilateral hand contractures.During a subsequent observation on 04/29/2026 at 11:08 AM, Resident #28 was observed sitting in the hallway in her personal wheelchair with a lap belt in place.Review of Resident #28's clinical record documented diagnoses to include unspecified sequelae of cerebrovascular infarction, unspecified dementia, essential hypertension, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, multiple contractures, history of falls, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Determination of Capacity form dated 10/28/2020 documented Resident #28 lacks capacity to make medical decisions.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set [MDS} assessments were accurate for 4 of 10 residents, Residents #3, #9, #28, and #62, reviewed for assessments. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #3's Minimum Date Set (MDS) titled Quarterly dated 3/4/2026 Section I Active Diagnosis did not have psychiatric/mood disorders documented. Review of Resident #3's psychiatry subsequent note dated 1/5/2026 read, Chief Complaint: psychosis, mood, depression, and dementia. Review of Resident #3's psychiatry subsequent note dated 2/19/2026 read, Chief Complaint: Psychosis, mood disorder, depression, and dementia. Review of Resident #3's physician order dated 2/12/2026 read, Depakote [a medication used to treat certain types of psychosis] Oral Tablet delayed release 500 mg [milligrams] (Divalproex Sodium) give 500 mg by mouth two times a day for mood stabilization. During an interview on 4/29/2026 at 10:10 AM Staff F, Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Coordinator stated, [Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with newly evident or known diagnosis of serious mental disorders have a coordinated Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 5 of 10 residents, Residents # 106, #14, #9, #40, and #12, reviewed for PASRR. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #106's medical record documented diagnosis to include major depressive disorder recurrent mild dated 2/9/2026. Review of Resident #106's Preadmission Screening Resident Review (PASRR) was dated 11/6/2025 did not have a diagnosis of major depressive disorder documented. Review of Psychological evaluation notes dated 2/18/2026 documented DX [diagnosis]: F33.0 Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Mild. Review of Resident #106's physician order dated 2/10/2026 read, Remeron oral tablet 30 mg [milligrams] (Mirtazapine) give one table at bedtime for major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #106's medication administration record (MAR) dated April 2026 read, Remeron [a medication used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 3 of 10 residents, Residents #9, #40, and Resident #28 sampled for care plans.Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #9 psychiatry subsequent note dated 2/26/2026 read, Chief Complaint: Depression. Reason for encounter: Today, I saw the patient for medication management as patient has active psychiatric diagnosis, is in the facility setting, and last psychiatric visit was 12 or more weeks ago. History of Presenting Illness: This is a [Resident #9's age] patient with past psychiatric history of depression. Today, I saw the patient for medication management as patient has no symptoms of depression. Patient is eating and sleeping decently. Patient is not on any psych meds. The current diagnoses are being managed by non-pharmacological interventions. Plan of Action: The patient is not on any active psychiatric medications to be continued. Diagnoses Rationale and Justifications: Adjustment disorder with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 3 of 7 residents, Residents #57, #62, and #93, reviewed for revised care plans. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #57 Quarterly Nursing Comprehensive Evaluation dated 1/24/2026 read, 7. Smoking Evaluation: resident may smoke independently or with set up. Review of Resident #57 care plan initiated on 3/11/2026 read, [Resident #57's name] desires to smoke. Resident has been assessed as able to smoke: with supervision d/t [do to] poor safety awareness. During an interview on 4/29/2026 at 9:56 AM Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated, [Resident #57's name] is consider a safe smoker. He is able to keep materials with him except the lighters. I always light the cigarettes for all residents to be safe, but if he [Resident #57] had a lighter he could light the cigarettes himself. During an interview on 4/29/2026 at 10:15 AM Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Minimum Data Set Coordinator stated, [Resident #57 's name] care plan needs to be updated, he is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when a skin tear was identified for 1 of 3 residents, Resident #57, a low blood sugar value and physicians' ordered insulin not being administered for 2 of 6 residents, Residents #6 and #102. Findings include:1) During an observation on 04/27/2026 10:13 AM Resident #57 was sitting in bed there was gauze with tape over the resident's right hand with dried dark matter and a band aide with dry blood on the side of outer part of the resident's right hand. There was no date on the dressings.During an interview on 4/27/2026 at 10:13 AM Resident #57 stated, They put the band aide on his Friday [4/24/2026] they need to change it. During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 12:24 PM Resident #57 was in the room. There was a band aide on the outer part of the resident's right hand with dried dark matter.During an observation on 4/28/2026 at 9:13 AM Resident #57 was lying in bed there was a band aide on the outer side of the resident's right had with dried dark matter.During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary medications for 3 of 6 residents, Residents #8, #28, and #74, reviewed for medications.Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #8's physician orders dated 1/30/2026 read, Cozaar oral tablet 100 mg [milligrams] (Losartan Potassium) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension. Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 110 or HR (heart rate) less than 60 Review of the Resident #8's MAR from 3/01/2026 through 4/28/2026 documented Cozaar oral tablet 100 mg (Losartan Potassium) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension. Hold for SBP less than 110 or HR less than 60 -Start Date 01/31/2026 0900 -D/C Date 04/29/2026 2122 (9:22 PM). There was documentation of administration on 3/14/2026 with a heart rate (HR) of 58; administration on 4/06/2026 with a HR of 58; 4/08/2026 with a HR of 53; on 4/16/2026 with a HR of 59; and administration on 4/22/2026 with a HR of 58. During an interview on 4/30/2026 at 12:15 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles for 1 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 4 hallways reviewed for unattended medication and labeling.Findings include: 1) During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 9:37 AM Resident #24 was sitting in his wheelchair, there was a clear plastic medication cup with a white cream that was not labeled at the side from where the resident was sitting. [Photographic evidence obtained] During an interview on 4/27/2026 at 9:37 AM Resident #24 stated, That's for my bottom [pointing at the white cream in the medication cup.] I put it on myself. 2) During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 9:43 AM Resident #15 was sitting up in bed, on her bedside table there was zinc oxide ointment. [Photographic evidence obtained] During an interview on 4/27/2026 at 9:43 AM Resident #15 stated, I buy the cream and the staff put it on for me. 3) During an observation on 4/27/2026 at 10:18 AM Resident #13 was lying in bed. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food is properly and safely stored, labeled, and dated in 2 of 2 nourishment rooms. Findings Include: During an observation on 4/27/26 at 9:25 AM of the [NAME] Wing nourishment room, there was a Salisbury steak frozen meal in the freezer that was not labeled or dated. During interview on 4/27/26 at 9:28 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager, stated that the foods should be labeled and dated.During an observation 4/27/26 at 9:40 AM of the East Wing nourishment room, there were three packages of smoked vegan turkey packaged meats, a frozen falafel, and an open box of frozen cheese pizza not labeled or dated in the freezer.During interview on 4/27/26 at 9:45 AM the Certified Dietary Manager stated that the foods should be labeled and dated.Review of the policy and procedures titled: Foods Brought in From the Outside reviewed 12/16/25, read, It will be the policy of this facility to provide safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption of all food including food and beverages brought to residents by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to ensure complete and accurate records for 2 of 5 residents, Residents #40 and #62, reviewed for medical record documentation. Findings include: During an observation on 4/27/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM Resident #40 was sitting up in bed dressed in a hospital gown. She was clean and well groomed. A bordered gauze dressing was observed on her left wrist dated 4/24. During an interview on 4/27/2026 at approximately 10:00 AM Resident #40 stated she was unsure of what happened with her wrist, but the nurse had put a dressing on it. Review of Resident #40's physician's order did not show an order for wound care to the resident's left wrist. Review of Resident #40's Progress Notes documented a Health Status Note dated 4/24/2026 that read, Note Text: resident observed sitting in chair directly across from nurses station scratching left forearm, open area was noted. Resident stated its itching, and left forearm cleansed with wound cleanser, xerofoam and border gauze dressing applied. MD (Medical Doctor) notified 1758 (5:38…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SHERMAN FAMILY — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 45 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $10K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL