No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Humboldt House Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

64 Hager Street, Buffalo, NY 14208 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 173 certified beds · (716) 886-4377 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations$270,666 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $270,666 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2157 Main St Fl 1 · (716) 862-1984 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1453 Jefferson Ave · (716) 885-7878 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
322 Northland Ave · (716) 881-0162 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%5.8%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%19.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.4%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.7%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.5%13.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.5%95.3%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%6.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.0%19.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.2%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.9%78.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.5%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.9%9.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.141.701.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.771.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 41.1–67.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.2–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 4.3–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.63
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
59.5%
Total nursing turnover
56.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 155.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.14 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-10)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during an Extended Recertification Survey and complaint investigations (#NY00385595 - 574018, #NY00381410 - 574678) completed on 10/10/2025, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from physical abuse, mistreatment, and neglect for five (5) (Residents #15, #29, #34, #91, #135) of eight (8) residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to implement sufficient interventions to protect and prevent resident-to-resident abuse resulting in Resident #155 hitting four (4) residents between 02/15/2025 to 07/02/2025. Administration and medical staff failed to recognize abuse and neglect. This resulted in, or had the likelihood for, psychosocial harm and physical harm that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care for Residents #15, #29, #34, and #91 with the likelihood to affect all residents (census 145) in the facility. In addition, Certified Nurse Aide #7 used profanity and spoke to Resident #135 in a demeaning manner, then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during an Extended Recertification and Complaint (reference #NY00339732 and #NY00325989) survey from 5/13/2024 to 5/23/2024 the facility failed to protect resident's rights to be free from abuse and failed to protect residents from further abuse for three (Resident #129, #104 and #122) of seven residents reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse. Specifically, Resident #129 was verbally and physically threatened by Resident #74 on 4/16/2024 with a large pair of scissors. The facility failed to provide protection for Resident #129 by allowing Resident #74 ongoing access to Resident #129. This resulted in mental anguish for Resident #129 as they stated on 4/19/2024 to Social Worker #1 that they were fearful for their life as they recounted the events of 4/16/2024. In addition, facility staff failed to provide protection from sexual abuse for Residents #104 and #122. Both residents were severely cognitively impaired and lacked the ability to consent to a sexual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during an Extended Recertification and Complaint (reference #NY00339732 and #NY00325989) survey from 5/13/2024 to 5/23/2024 the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations of abuse are reported immediately, but not later than 2-hours after the allegation is made to the administrator of the facility and to appropriate officials (including the State Survey Agency) for three (Resident #104, #122, and #129) of fourteen residents reviewed for abuse reporting. Specifically, Registered Nurse #1 did not report alleged resident-to-resident abuse that occurred between Resident #74 and #129 to the Administrator. The lack of reporting resulted in continued access to each other and mental anguish for Resident #129. Additionally, Residents #122 and Resident #104 who lacked capacity to consent were observed engaged in non-consensual sexual activity. Facility staff failed to report the sexual abuse immediately to the Administrator which resulted in continued sexual abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, based on facility surveillance footage, facility investigation, and an eyewitness account, a certified nurse aide was physically abusive to Resident #1. This is identified as past noncompliance The findings include: The undated facility policy titled Resident Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure documented residents have the right to be free from abuse and associates must not use physical abuse against any resident. The facility explicitly and expressly prohibits and will take steps to prevent any associates from engaging in any behavior or actions that may result in the abuse of residents. In response to any allegations of abuse or mistreatment the facility will ensure all alleged violations involving abuse are reported in the proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a survey, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse are reported immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, an allegation of staff to resident verbal and physical abuse was not reported to the facility Administrator and to the New York State Department of Health within the required two-hour timeframe. This is identified as past noncompliance. The findings include:Refer to F 600 Freedom from Abuse and Neglect, scope and severity DThe undated facility policy titled Resident Right to Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedure documented residents have the right to be free from abuse and associates must not use physical abuse against any resident. In response to any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, observations of one (1) of one (1) kitchen revealed an active ceiling leak in front of the walk-in refrigeration and freezer units, several missing and broken wall tiles, the commercial oven range was soiled with grease and food debris, the wall behind the stove, oven, and two (2) bay sink was heavily soiled with grease, the drain pipe underneath the hand wash sink leaked, the paper towel dispenser by the hand wash sink was non-working, and ceiling pipes were covered with dust. Additionally, the walk-in freezer had black debris around the window, a broken gasket, and accumulated condensation and ice buildup on the exterior and interior door surfaces, the floor, and ceiling. The findings include: The policy titled Sanitation dated October 2008 documented the food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All equipment, food contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey the facility failed to ensure that each resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for one (1) (Resident # 20) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #20 was served their lunch meal when they were visibly incontinent. In addition, there were soiled linens, a large amount of fecal matter, and soiled briefs and linens on the floor between their bed and wall.The findings include:The policy and procedure titled Dignity dated 2/21 documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes their sense of well-being, and feelings of self-esteem. The residents are always to be treated with dignity and respect.Resident #20 had diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (stroke) Schizophrenia (a chronic severe brain disorder characterized by hallucinations and delusions) and intellectual disability. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 02/18/2026 documented Resident #20 was understood, understands and was severely cognitively impaired.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey the facility failed to ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) (Residents #20) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #20 was not provided with incontinent care every two (2) to three (3) hours and was not provided with timely incontinent care prior to lunch being served. Additionally, a care plan was not developed for bowel and bladder incontinence. The findings include:The policy and procedure titled Perineal Care dated 2/2018 documented the purpose of this procedure was to provide cleanliness and comfort to the residents, to prevent infection and skin irritation.Resident #20 had diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (stroke) Schizophrenia (a chronic severe brain disorder characterized by hallucinations and delusions) and intellectual disability. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 02/18/2026 documented Resident #20 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review conducted during the survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents who had an indwelling Foley catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received the appropriate care and services to manage catheters for one (1) (Resident #19) of three (3) residents reviewed for Foley catheters. Specifically, Resident #19 had a history of urinary tract infections, and the urine collection bag was observed lying directly on the floor on multiple occasions. Additionally, infection control practices were not maintained while emptying the urine collection bag and staff did not utilize enhanced barrier precautions (interventions designed to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms including gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) when providing direct hands-on care.The findings include: The policy and procedure titled Urinary Catheter Care dated 8/2022 documented that catheter tubing and drainage bag were to be kept off the floor, the collection bag was to be emptied at least every eight (8)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — widespread
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review conducted during Complaint investigations (#NY00365084-574660, #NY00385595-574018, NY00381410- 574678) completed during an Extended recertification survey completed on 10/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for five (5) (Resident #8, #15, #131, #135 and #155) of five (5) residents reviewed. Specifically, the results of an abuse allegation investigation were not sent to the State Agency within five (5) working days of the incident (Residents #15, #135 and #155). Additionally,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (NY00372414 - 574672) during the Standard survey completed on 09/19/2025, the facility did not ensure that there was sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies on a 24-hour basis to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for residents in the facility (floors two (2), three (3), four (4)). Specifically, there was insufficient staff to meet all the residents needs including long wait times to get mediations and call bells answered, toileting/hygiene, and showers. Additionally, the facility did not meet their assessed minimum staffing levels for Licensed Nurses based on the facilities assessment to meet the needs of each resident. The findings are:The undated Facility Assessment documented registered nurse numbers were based on census and licensed practical nurse numbers would be based on census/acuity and level of care. The assessment documented that the staffing and competencies section provided an evaluation of the overall number and types…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during the Extended Recertification Survey completed on 10/10/2025, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility must operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards and principles that apply to professionals providing services in such a facility. Specifically, the administration did not ensure that psychiatric services were available, make outside arrangements or assist residents with accessing such services.The findings are:The undated Facility Assessment documented the workforce profile would list all personnel, including manager, staff (both employees and those who provide service under contract), and volunteers. The workforce profile listed that mental/Behavioral health providers would be contracted by the ((name of company) behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-10 · tag F0841 — widespread
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review conducted during the Extended Survey completed on 10/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Medical Director was responsible for implementing resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility. Specifically, the Medical Director normalized physical altercations between dementia residents. The finding is:Refer to F 600 Free from Abuse and Neglect - Scope and Severity = L The undated facility document titled Medical Director Job Description documented the Medical Director must ensure the implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility to promote quality, safety, and compliance with federal and state regulations. Responsibilities included but were not limited to promoting a culture of accountability, safety, and continuous improvement; provides guidance, consultation, and oversight to clinical staff as needed; promotes ethical medical practice and adherence to residents' rights and choices; ensures resident care decisions respect autonomy, dignity, and rights; and advocates for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Standard survey completed on 09/16/2025, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program for four (4) (first, second, third, and fourth floors) of four (4) resident use floors. Issues included observations of evidence of rodents (dead rodents and rodent droppings) and flies.The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Pest Control, revised 7/2023, documented the facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Pest control services are provided by an outside contracted pest control vendor. 1a. Observation on the first floor on 09/09/2025 at 1:40 PM and 09/16/2025 at 1:10 PM revealed rodent droppings were on the floor behind the door of the Dietary Storage Room. During an interview on 09/16/2025 at 1:10 PM, the Dietary Director stated on 09/08/2025, they personally moved chemicals, crates, and carboard in the area behind the door of the Dietary Storage Room. They…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during a Complaint investigation (NY00370611-574668, NY00372414-574672, and 2563935) completed during the Standard survey on 09/16/2025, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, there were areas of damaged walls and ceilings, dust laden fans inside resident rooms, soiled and sticky floors, and unpleasant odors. This affected three (3) (second, third, and fourth floors) of four (4) resident use floors.The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, documented residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting, including a clean, sanitary, and orderly environment and pleasant, neutral scents.The policy and procedure titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 9/16/2025, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the resident has a right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. Specifically, one of three residents (Resident #5) reviewed for choices had issues with not receiving a shower for three weeks per their preference. The finding is:The policy and procedure titled Resident Rights dated 12/2016 documented that the resident has a right to self-determination.The policy and procedure titled Resident Rights Guideline for All Nursing Procedures dated 10/2010 documented that the resident has a freedom of choice.Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of paralysis of the right side of the body and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 6/19/2025 documented that the resident understands and is understood by others, cognitively intact, and requires maximal assist of staff for bathing.Review of the comprehensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review during the Standard survey completed on 09/16/2025, the facility did not implement written policies and procedures for screening employees that would prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, the facility did not provide documentation that verified three (3) (Registered Nurse Supervisor #1, Unit Clerk #1, and Dietary Supervisor #1) of eight (8) employees reviewed that worked in the facility and were subject to the New York State Nurse Aide Registry had been screened through the New York State Nurse Aide Registry prior to their first date worked at the facility.The findings are:The policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, documented the resident abuse, neglect and exploitation prevention program consisted of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support its objectives. The objectives included developing and implementing policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during a Standard survey completed on 9/16/2025, the facility did not ensure that comprehensive care plans included to the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident's representative(s); an explanation must be included in a resident's medical record if the participation of the resident and their resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident's care plan; and were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for two (2) (Residents #29 and #74) of two (2) residents reviewed for care plan participation and care plan revision related to accidents. Specifically, Resident #74's representative was not invited to participate in care plan meetings and Resident #29's care plan was not revised when the resident was removed from one to one supervision after they transferred to a secure unit. The findings are:The undated document titled Social Worker documented that a Social Worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 9/16/25, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) (Resident #88) of one (1) resident reviewed for positioning. Specifically, while sitting in their wheelchair, Resident #88's feet were hanging down and were approximately four (4) to six (6) inches from touching the floor for extended periods of time.Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 9/16/25, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (1) (Resident #88) of one (1) resident reviewed for positioning. Specifically, while sitting in their wheelchair, Resident #88's feet were hanging down and were approximately four (4) to six (6) inches from touching the floor for extended periods of time. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Repositioning revised May 2013 documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey, completed on 09/16/2025, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision abilities; and if necessary, must assist the resident in making appointments for one (1) (Resident #57) of one (1) resident reviewed for treatment/services to maintain vision. Specifically, the facility did not act on the optometry recommendations for cataract surgery for Resident #57 from 10/29/2024 and again on 06/10/2025. The finding is:The policy titled Resident Rights, last revised December 2016, documented federal and state laws guaranteed certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. Those rights included the residents right to a dignified existence and communication with and access to people and services, both inside and outside the facility.The facility did not have any policies regarding hearing or vision, consultants or outside consults, or provider recommendations.Resident #57 had diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Complaint investigation (Complaint #NY00381662-574015) during the Standard survey on 09/16/2025, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remained free from accident hazards over which the facility had control and provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (1) (Resident #29) of one (1) resident reviewed for elopement. Specifically, on 05/26/2025 Resident #29 had exited the facility through a service door, out of a fenced gate and was found at the local corner store. Additionally, Resident #29 was observed not wearing their wander guard as care planned, wander guard checks were not implemented for placement every shift, and the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM wander guard checks for functionality were not implemented. The finding is:The policy and procedure titled Wandering and Elopements, last revised March 2019, documented the facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-10 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review conducted during an Extended survey completed on 10/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for two (2) (Residents #6 and #155) of five (5) residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #6 was not receiving psychotherapy services and/or group therapy services as recommended by their psychiatry provider and there was a delay in obtaining a follow up psychiatry consult as recommended for Resident #155. The findings are:The undated policy titled Resident Rights documented federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. The policy documented those rights included the resident right to self-determination; be informed of, and participate in, his/her care planning and treatment; and participate in decision-making regarding his/her care. 1.Resident #6 had diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00379533) the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of rodents for three (first, third, and fourth floors) of four resident use floors. Specifically, there were multiple observations of dead rodents in traps, evidence of rodent droppings, and complaints of rodent sightings in resident rooms. The findings are: 1a. Observations on the third floor on 6/18/25 between 8:54 AM and 10:00 AM revealed the following: -Five rodent droppings observed inside Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] in the far-right corner of the room, to the side of the large wardrobe. -In Resident room [ROOM NUMBER], the three-drawer dresser in center of room had ten to twelve rodent droppings inside the drawers. There was a cookie wrapper inside a drawer with several droppings in the wrapper. Also, about twelve rodent droppings were observed on the floor in this room's closet in the far corner,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews during a complaint investigation (#NY00356620) the facility did not ensure that all residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for the comprehensive care plans for one (1) (Resident #2) of three (3) residents reviewed. Specifically, treatments to the resident's bilateral lower extremity venous (relating to the vein) ulcers were not being completed as ordered by the physician. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Pressure Ulcers/ Skin Breakdown- Clinical Protocol with a revision date of March 2014 documented the physician will authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments, including wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings, and application of topical agents if indicated for type of skin alteration. The policy and procedure titled Medication and Treatment Orders with a revision date July 2016 documented orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing. Medications shall be administered only upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Abbreviated survey completed on 12/31/24 (Complaint # NY00357248) the facility did not protect residents from sexual abuse for two (Resident #1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 wandered into Resident #2's room without staff knowledge and they were found engaged in sexual activity. Resident #1 and Resident #2 both lacked the ability to consent due to their cognitive impairment. The finding is: The policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised September 2021, documented residents have the right to be free from abuse by anyone which includes but is not limited to verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse. Establish and maintain a culture of compassion and caring for all residents and particularly those with behavior, cognitive and emotional problems. The policy titled Identifying Sexual Abuse and Capacity to Consent, dated September 2022, documented a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a Complaint (#NY00363866) investigation, the facility did not ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, there was no skin assessment completed for a resident readmitted to the facility with multiple pressure and vascular ulcers (develop due to poor circulation) that included measurements, description of the ulcers, and staging (pressure); this resulted in a delay in obtaining physician orders and treatment initiation. The finding is: The undated policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol documented the staff will examine the skin of a new admission for ulcerations or alterations in skin. The nurse shall describe and document/report the following: full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates (drainage) or necrotic (dead) tissue. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview and record review during a compliant investigation (#NY003266278, #NY00332285) completed during an extended survey ending 5/23/24, the facility did not provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, four (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) of four floors had environmental concerns. The issues involved the lacked hot water in resident rooms; lack of adequate resident access to bathrooms, plastic bags over sinks, and call bells that were not functioning in a shared resident bathroom. Additionally, observed were soiled walls, dirty window shades, dirty utility hoppers, mold in shower rooms, foul odors, windows, and ceilings in disrepair/stained. The findings are: The policy statement titled Water Temperatures, Safety of revised 12/09, documented tap water in the facility shall be kept within temperature range to prevent scalding residents. Water heaters should be set no more than 110 degrees. The maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Extended Recertification and Complaint (#NY00333644) survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not provide food and drink that was at a safe and appetizing temperature for three (Second floor Unit, Third floor Unit, and Fourth floor Unit) of three test trays. Specifically, food and beverages during meals were served at suboptimal temperatures and were not palatable. Residents #21, #27, #41, #82, #125, #134, #359, and #506, were involved. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Food Temperature Monitoring dated 3/23/23, documented that potentially hazardous foods shall be kept at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below when cold or 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above when hot, and temperatures shall be maintained during storage, preparation, transport, and service. During an interview 5/13/24 11:54 AM, Resident #134 stated the food that was provided to the residents was horrible, portion sizes were very small, the biscuits were hard, the bread was soggy, and they had found hair in their food once. They stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Extended survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for three (Second floor Unit, Third floor Unit, and Fourth floor Unit) of three nourishment unit refrigerators reviewed. Specifically, the nourishment kitchen refrigerators contained undated, unlabeled, expired food and drink items, and had liquid spills and dried substances on surfaces; the Fourth floor Unit refrigerator was not holding a safe food storage temperature and subsequently lacked a thermometer; the Second floor Unit refrigerator had no thermometer. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Food Temperature Monitoring dated 3/23/23, documented that the temperature of each refrigeration unit used for food and beverage storage shall be monitored twice a day at the start of first shift and just prior to closing the area for the day. The policy and procedure titled Foods brought by Family/Visitors from the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review conducted during an Extended survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident had the right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered care plan and facilitate the inclusion of the resident for one (Resident #134) of four residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #134 was not informed, in advance to participate in their scheduled care plan meeting. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Resident Participation - Assessment/ Care Plans dated February 2021, documented the resident has the right to participate in the development and implementation of their plan of care. The facility staff supports and encourages resident to participate in the care planning process by providing sufficient notice in advance of the meeting; and planning for enough time for exchange of information and decision making. The Social Services Director or designee was responsible for notifying the resident and for maintaining records of such notices. Resident #134 had diagnoses that included benign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Extended Recertification and Compliant (#NY00332285, #NY00329276) survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not ensure that each residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for three (Resident #1, #101 and #134) of six residents. Specifically, a resident was treated disrespectfully and without dignity when a staff member acted in an unprofessional and undignified manner (#134). In addition, a multi stall bathroom was shared by both male and female residents on the dementia unit without privacy door and/or curtains (#1 and #101). The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Dignity dated 2/21 documented each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes their sense of well-being, and feelings of self-esteem. The residents are always to be treated with dignity and respect. 1. Resident #134 had diagnoses that included benign intracranial hypertension (increased pressure in the skull), chronic pain syndrome, and migraine headaches. The Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during an Extended Recertification and Complaint (#NY00339732) survey completed 5/23/24 the facility did not ensure that all alleged allegations of abuse, were thoroughly investigated for two (Resident #74 and #129) of fourteen residents reviewed. Specifically, there was a delay in the initiation of an investigation for a reported allegation of resident- to- resident abuse. Additionally, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation to include interviews of residents involved and other potential witnesses. The finding is: The policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating revised September 2022 documented all reports of resident abuse are thoroughly investigated by facility management. The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum: observes the alleged victim, including their interactions with staff and other residents; interviews the resident (as medically appropriate) or the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Recertification Survey and Complaint (#NY00326278) survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident who was unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living received the necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene for three (Resident #27,102, 105) of six residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #27 was not provided with timely incontinence care that resulted in their brief and bed linens saturated with urine through to the mattress, also the Certified Nurse Aide performed incomplete incontinence care (lack of washing bilateral buttocks and hips and removal of saturated brief) with improper hand hygiene, glove changes, and touched items in the resident's room with soiled gloves. Additionally, Residents #102 and #105 had long jagged fingernails with brown debris. The findings are: Review of the policy and procedure titled Perineal (the area between the anus and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during an Extended Survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not ensure that each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for four (Resident #16, #154, #305, #360) of thirty three residents reviewed for quality of care. Specifically, the issues involved inaccurately transcribed physician's orders resulting in delay in treatment and there was no comprehensive care plan developed for indwelling foley catheter use and urinary tract infections (#16). In addition, PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) line dressing changes (#305, #360), and supplements were not administered in accordance with physician's orders (#154). The findings are but not limited to: The policy and procedure titled Medication and Treatment Orders revised date July 2016 documented that verbal orders must be recorded immediately in the resident's chart by the person receiving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during the Extended Survey completed on 5/23/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered the pneumococcal and influenza immunizations. Additionally, the facility did not ensure the residents medical record includes documentation that indicates education regarding the benefits and the potential side effects of the immunizations was provided for four (Resident #10, #54, #406, #456) of five residents reviewed. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that residents #10, #54, #406, and #456 were offered/declined, and educated on the influenza, pneumococcal immunizations. The findings are but not limited to: The policy and procedure titled Pneumococcal Vaccine dated 10/23 documented all residents are offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. The policy documented that assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status are conducted within five business days of admission to the facility. Education of benefits,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review conducted during a complaint investigation (#NY00328621) completed 1/25/2024, the facility did not ensure that all alleged allegations of abuse, were thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not complete a thorough investigation into an injury of unknown origin, a bruise to Resident #1 face to include staff interviews. The finding is: Review of the policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating revised in 9/2022 documented all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin) neglect, exploitation, or theft/ misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. The individual conducting the investigation at a minimum will interview the person reporting the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during an Abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00301582) completed 9/18/23, the facility did not provide a homelike environment, allowing residents to use their personal belongings to the extent possible and exercise reasonable care for protection of the resident's property from loss for one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 was observed wearing the same clothes for three days and had no other clothing available that belonged to them. Additionally, the clothes that were in Resident #2 closet belonged to the previous resident. The finding is: The facility's policy revised August 2022 and titled, Personal Property documented residents are permitted to retain and use personal possessions, including furniture and clothing, as space permits, unless doing so would infringe on the rights or health and safety of other residents. Residents are encouraged to use personal belongings to maintain a homelike environment and foster…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00304843) completed during the Standard survey completed 2/9/23, the facility did not maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of rodents. One of one kitchen and three (Unit 2, 3 & 4) three units had issues with rodents. There were multiple observations of evidence of mice (droppings) and traps. In addition, multiple complaints of mouse siting's in resident rooms, hallways, kitchen, and food storage areas. This involved Residents #59, 67, 93, 104, 138, 139, and 452. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P/P) titled Pest Control dated 5/08 documented the facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. The P/P titled Preventing Foodborne Illness-Food Handling dated 7/14 documented food will be stored, prepared, handled and served so that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed 2/9/23, the facility did not protect, promote, and treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Specifically, there was a lack of dignity with dinning. Two (Resident #138 and #450) of two residents reviewed had issues with a delay in assistance with eating, standing while feeding (#450) and not receiving preferences (#138). Additionally, three (Units 2, 3 and 4) of three resident units had issues with the use of plastic utensils or no utensils, no glasses or straws provided for beverages in cartons, no condiments, and coffee was not served on the lunch and dinner trays. This involved Residents # 83,138, 451, and 452. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P/P) titled Dignity dated 2/21 documented each resident shall be cared for in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during a Standard survey completed 2/9/23, the facility did not provide food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Specifically, three (Units #2, #3 and #4) of three resident units reviewed for food temperatures during meals had issues involving trays being passed on the units with long wait times, food items that were not palatable and not served at safe and appetizing temperatures. Residents' #58, #83, #104, #138, #452 and #453 were involved. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Food Preparation and Service dated/revised 4/2019 documented food and nutritional service employees shall prepare and serve food in the manner that complies with safe food handling. The danger zone for food temperatures is between 41 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and 135 °F. The longer foods remain in the danger zone the greater the risk for growth of harmful pathogens. Therefore, potentially hazardous foods must be maintained at 41 °F or below or at 135 °F or above. 1.During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00304843) completed during the Standard survey completed 2/9/23, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, one of one Kitchen had floors that were sticky, not swept and had a thick black substance buildup along the walls of the perimeter of the kitchen and in the grout between the tiles. Wire shelves and equipment had a thick layer of sticky grease buildup. There were multiple tiles missing on the walls and floor throughout the kitchen. Threshold to a door entering the kitchen had a one foot by one foot hole in the concrete. Ceiling was leaking near the air conditioning unit with a liquid substance dripping onto the floor. Ceiling throughout the kitchen had a dark thick black dust like substance, was also on the pipes on the ceiling and sprinkler heads, all of which was above the area of tray line service. The ice machine had rusted bolts inside which where touching the ice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-09 · tag F0836 — pattern
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review during the Standard survey completed on 2/9/23, the facility did not operate and provide services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes. Specifically, the facility was not in compliance with Section 915 of the 2020 Fire Code of New York State, which requires carbon monoxide (CO) detection shall be installed in residential buildings and commercial buildings in all rooms and occupiable spaces, that contain a fuel burning appliance and the facility did not have a policy and procedure for the installation, inspection, testing, and maintenance of carbon monoxide (CO) detectors. This affected one (First floor) of four resident use floors. The findings are: According to the 2020 Fire Code of New York State, carbon monoxide (CO) detection shall be installed in residential buildings and commercial buildings in all rooms, occupiable space, dwelling units, sleeping areas, and sleeping units that contain a fuel burning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00307276) completed during the Standard survey completed on 2/9/23, the facility did not exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft and maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. Specifically, one (Resident #452) of four residents reviewed for personal property was transferred to the hospital on 1/23/23 and returned to the facility on 1/31/23 and has not been given their personal property back that was left at the facility during hospitalization. In addition, two (Units #2 and #3) of three units had issues with dirty linen, dirty floors, dirty tub rooms to include but not limited to dirty grout, peeling paint and soiled linen and paper debris all over the floor. This involved Residents #101 and #138. The findings are: The policy and procedure (P/P) titled Personal Property revised 3/21 documented residents are permitted to retain and use personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a Complaint Investigation (Complaint #NY00291178 and NY00298606) completed during a Standard survey completed 2/9/23, the facility did not ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards and adequate supervision was provided for two (Resident's #28 and #94) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, staff reheated coffee in a microwave, did not take the temperature of the beverage before they served it, and the resident sustained a burn (Resident #28); the facility did not have an effective system in place for monitoring the wander guard (device to detect wandering) functionality and presence of bracelets, and the care plan did not include use of a wander guard (Resident #94). The findings are: The facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting revised July 2017 documented incident/accident reports will be reviewed by the Safety Committee for trends related to accident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review conducted during the Standard survey completed on 2/9/23, the facility did not maintain resident call bell systems in working order. Specifically, call bells in resident rooms did not activate the light above the room's door or the indicator of the call bell system at the Nurses' Station. This affected two (third floor and fourth floor) of three resident floors. This involved Residents # 35,38, 58, 298 and 398. The findings are: The facility's policy and procedure titled Call Light/Call Bell/Nurse Call System dated 9/6/18 documented residents will be provided access to a call light. The call light would be answered promptly. A visual light would be present outside of each room. In some cases, an audible signal would be present with the activation of the call system. If a call bell was defective, report immediately to the immediate supervisor. a. During observations and interviews on the third floor on 2/2/23 from 9:39 AM to 3:30 PM revealed the following: - The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$270,666 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $198,200 — penalty dated 2025-10-10
  • $72,466 — penalty dated 2024-05-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE SHERMAN FAMILY — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AMSEL, HINDYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/20/2014
GOLDSTEIN, JEFFERYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 02/20/2014
MENDLOWITZ, ESTHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 02/20/2014
SHERMAN, ALEXANDERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST17%since 02/20/2014
SHERMAN, LEAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST24%since 02/20/2014
SHERMAN, TZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 02/20/2014
SHERMAN, YEHUDAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 02/20/2014
HARDY, MICHELLEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/28/2019

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 4%Other / private 35%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,517per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$254per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335164. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next